| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful, new girls every week.
Quality, lengthy videos.
They do anal when the girl is willing.
Lots of sex - no time wasted arranging cameras, watching girls dress and undress in various outfits, etc.
Focus is where it should be - on the girl, not the male performer. Finally, a site where the prop (i.e. the male performer) keeps his mouth shut. None of that "oh, how does that feel," or "do you like it," or "am I better than your boyfriend" crap you get on other sites.
There is a ton of content. While the number of videos may have been a concern in the past, it is no longer. There are around 25 pages, each with 6 videos (and each video is about 1.5 gb in size). In other words, lots of downloading to do. |
| Cons: |
The sex is ALWAYS the same. Blowjob with him standing, her kneeling by the bed, 5 minutes. Doggy style for 5 minutes or so, missionary for 5 minutes or so, blowjob interlude, 5 minutes, cowgirl, 3 minutes, reverse cowgirl, 3 minutes, guy jerking off and facial, 5 minutes.
It is true you have to be a member for a month before you can download high quality, at that is annoying, but one good thing is that as long as you come back using the same username as before, you get credit for prior time as a member (i.e. if you were a member for 2 months before and leave, when you come back, you don't have to wait another month to download at high quality).
There is one prop (i.e. one male performer) they use who must have a red ass fetish, because he cannot keep from spanking the girl's butt until its beat red. Its distracting, NOT sexy, and quite frankly, incredibly annoying. If I wanted to see a girl's butt red, I'd go searching for some weird sunburn fetish porn. This has got to stop. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of the better porn sites out there in my opinion. The girls are never-before seen, they are beautiful and young, and have great bodies. The props (what I call male "performers") don't needlessly abuse them or treat them like dirt. The props keep their mouths shut. The focus is where it should be - on the beautiful girl being fucked. I've been searching for a quality porn site for a long time, and this is the closest I've come so far. |
|
10-29-12 09:20pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
2
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
63.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- New, fresh, beautiful women.
- High quality video.
- Long videos with LOTS of sex.
- Videos contain a large degree of variety - different sex acts (blowjobs, vaginal, anal) and lots of different angles. |
| Cons: |
- Most videos force these poor women to lick - for a long time - this disgusting guy's disgusting butt-hole. I don't know who finds that sexy, but I think it is absolutely disgusting. Gross.
- The male "talent," (i.e. prop) who is also the camera guy, talk throughout the entire video. And not what you'd expect like asking the girl to talk about herself, etc. They ask stupid questions like "does that feel good?", "am I better than your boyfriend?" and "have you ever had one that big before?" It is constant and is a complete distraction and turn-off. Its gotten to the point where I have to completely mute the videos to watch them or I can't stomach it. Recently, they started using a new prop, whose voice is not quite so whiny, nasal and annoying as the guy who used to do this before, but the new prop still won't shut up and its a big problem.
- Site navigation is very difficult. 5 or so videos per page, in date order, that's it. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site's (lone) redeeming quality is, without a doubt, the girls. They are new, they are young, and they are beautiful. Usually I have never seen them before, or this is the first time I've seen them and I see them again later on. They do a lot of different sex acts (more on this later), sometimes do anal, etc. (The people who complain that the anal is not sexy because the girl is in obvious pain are absolutely correct. I like anal but I completely avoid it on this site).
There are two major problems with this site that make it not worth the $35 to join - first, the constant inane talking out of the male prop. As I mentioned before, its comments like "is that a big dick?" and "tell me you're my little whore". The talking is constant and appears designed to stroke the performers' fragile egos rather than designed to contribute to the video. Originally, they had a guy doing all the videos who not only talked CONSTANTLY, but had the single most annoying voice on the planet. Thankfully, they seem to have replaced him (no doubt after constant complaints from members), but the new guy, while he does not have as annoying of a voice, is no better in the constant blathering department.
But the one thing that drives me absolutely nuts about the videos is these guys' obsession with their own ass holes. I am convinced they are actually homosexuals (not that there's anything wrong with that). The video will be going along nicely, and then all of a sudden, out of the middle of nowhere, its "lick my ass hole baby." Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. Not to mention degrading to these women. And it lasts a LONG time too - its not just one lick and they're done - no - "more," "stick your tongue in there, baby." How these beautiful models can allow themselves to be subjected to sticking their tongues inside the butt hole of a disgusting guy is beyond me. I hope they're getting paid piles and piles of money for this. This absolutely ruins their videos for me. I mean, if it were in one predictable place, you could at least know to fast forward through it - not that that would redeem the fact that they do it. But it appears at random and there is no way to predict when you're going to get a long, detailed close up of man anus and scrotum. Without this act in their videos, I give the web site a 75. This just ruins it for me - there are no redeeming qualities to this despicable act. I feel so sorry for the models who are subjected to these animals.
Lastly, as others have pointed out but it merits repeating, these guys are chicken to have their faces shown on camera (of course, no problem putting the women on camera, but you get their faces in the shot and they run screaming like little girls). This severely limits the angles (its pov/mounted camera shot, so the angles are already severely limited). While I think they do an ok job editing the videos together, it is still a problem.
All in all, the videos are long, lots of sex, and the quality is decent. But, the incessant talking and the lengthy close ups of disgusting hairy man anus ruin it completely. Not worth the money and I would not recommend spending your hard-earned money on a membership to this train wreck of a web site. |
|
11-10-12 02:00pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
3
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very few to think of. One good thing is that the women are pretty hot. That's about it. |
| Cons: |
I don't want to re-hash what others have said. The real con, I think, is that this guy is the biggest, most pathetic two-pump chump in porn. You'd think that after having sex with hundreds of women on camera, he'd be able to last more than 30 seconds inside a girl without going off, but nope. The most recent video, he does a girl anally, spends about 17 seconds inside her butt, then gets ready to pull out. She really likes anal and basically has to beg him to stay in. This guy is really, really pathetic. This basically means that the actual sex part of the scenes are extremely short. Its like 90% stupid interview, 5% sex, and 5% him trying to keep from ejaculating. He also shrieked like a little girl when a girl squirted on him. Ridiculous. Get another stunt cock because you are really, really pathetic. Oh yeah, and as the other posters have mentioned - he needs to shut the fuck up. No one wants his inane voice in the background when they're trying to rub one out. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bad site with talent who can't last more than 30 seconds without ejaculating. Not worth the money. |
|
10-28-12 06:13am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
4
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
A decent point, for sure. But to tell you the truth, names are exaggerated all over the internet, and I certainly did not expect to see a girl licking a guy's butt when I joined. Wish I'd known!
|
11-10-12 03:45pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
DP is all hairy man ass. Disgusting. I want to see the girl, not the male prop.
|
11-06-12 01:04am
|
Reply
6
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Thanks for the welcome. This seems to be a friendly community. You are right about the condoms. I find that mildly annoying , but its not a deal-breaker for me. But it is something someone considering joining should know. Good point.
|
10-30-12 02:32pm
|
Reply
7
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks. You are right about the $60 thing. It's a huge drawback, I guess I took off less for it because I've been a member before so it's no longer an issue, but those considering spending their hard-earned money should know going in that it costs $60 for high def downloads. That sucks. They should change it.
|
10-30-12 02:27pm
|
Reply
8
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Oh I don't disagree at all. The women are beautiful and are, in my opinion, the one good thing about the site. I have to wonder how many promising young porn actresses we lost, though, because this two-pump chump was their first and only porn experience.
|
10-29-12 10:26pm
|
Reply
9
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Happy to - not sure I know exactly what you're asking for. If you have specific questions, feel free. Basically, the site updates about once a week (it seems to have been doing this for some time), just straight video, each about 20 minutes, downloadable. As others have said, each video is a carbon copy of the others, except for a new pretty face. Girl comes in under the pretense of getting a job in the "adult industry" that pays "$1000 to $5000 per day," is persuaded to take her clothes off, then is told, "producers don't just want to hire a pretty face. they need to see you take direction. so suck my cock" or some variation thereof. The interview in inane and lasts most of the video. She sucks him for as long as he can take it (usually not very long), then he lays her on on a desk (as others have pointed out, no padding, nothing), and eats her out for a bit. Then, he makes her bend over the desk (it ALWAYS follows this progression, by the way), he asks her "what's going to happen now," and she replies "I'm going to get fucked" or some variation thereof. He has sex with her doggy style for as long as he can take it, usually about 30 seconds (in a good number of the videos, he ejaculates at this point), then he pulls out, and has her lay on her back on the desk. After about 2-3 minutes of re-arranging cameras and telling her how to sit, he fucks her standing with her laying on the desk for as long as he can take it, usually no more than one minute. Then, he asks her, "do you know how porn movies end," she says "no," he says "with a facial." Then he lays her on the couch, jerks off for about as long as he can take it (usually about 20 seconds) and ejaculates. Fin.
What I find so frustrating about the site is that the sex is SO INCREDIBLY SHORT. He literally can't keep from cumming. Its amazing that a guy in the "adult industry" so long hasn't learned to hold it in for more than a minute. We all work very hard for our money, and there are lots of great porn sites out there - this is not one of them, and I cannot recommend anyone spending their hard-earned money on this garbage. Disappointing is a euphemism.
|
10-29-12 09:05pm
|
Reply
10
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Very well written and reasoned review. Couldn't agree more with everything you say. Not worth the money.
|
10-28-12 06:16am
|
|
