| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for that excellent break down. I'll probably go with Young Legal Porn--looks like a great site!
|
02-04-13 05:08pm
|
Reply
127
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Yes, great review lk2fireone. It's hard to figure out which Diesel site to join first. Any advice?
|
02-03-13 11:25am
|
Reply
128
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
pornstacker's Review
Thanks for the review and welcome to Porn Users. I checked out the free tour, and even though I'm not into fantasy games, this site looks interesting. Pornstacker, about how many different girls do they have here? Also, it seems like they incorporate an online game here-is that right? Are there different levels, with different maidens that get "unlocked" as you move on?
|
02-03-13 11:21am
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Its nice as a prelude to the good stuff.
|
02-02-13 09:51am
|
Reply
130
|
Microminimus
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Your review sums up my thoughts pretty well RearAdmiral. I joined this site a couple weeks ago, after seeing a gallery on Met-Art where the girl was wearing a wicked weasel. I've been aware of Wicked Weasel for over 10 years, but it had been quite a while since I had been to the site. I kinda got fooled into thinking it was a more traditional porn site by the limited free tour, only to find out that there are no zips once I joined. I like the site more than you do, but thats just cause I love hot babes in hot bikinis. The best stuff is in the model archives, and you can also find the hottest girls in the most popular galleries link. I've found a few that I really like, but like you mentioned, its a lot of work to download a gallery. BTW, the membership does not rebill automatically, so you don't have to worry about canceling.
|
02-01-13 04:39pm
|
Reply
131
|
Pure 18
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Nice review Elephant! One question: Are there any photos here or just vids? Thanks
|
02-01-13 10:45am
|
Reply
132
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Excellent review! I wonder if Suze will follow Holly's lead, and let Met-Art take over management of the site. Check a little down in the comments for the link about Met-Art managing Holly's site.
|
01-31-13 08:29pm
|
Reply
133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
LOL JayG, I'm one of those who has watched both at the same time. Porn on the laptop, football on the TV.
|
01-31-13 10:56am
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, I think its going to be a good game!
|
01-31-13 09:43am
|
Reply
135
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
You know lk2fireone, when I read your post, i was thinking to myself "I wish they had setting to make all the gallery photos show up on one page, like Femjoy does". So I go over to the site, log in, and start clicking around, and damnit, they do. I never knew all this time. It's so much easier to browse through the gallery when you don't have to click through 7 or 8 pages of thumbnails. Thanks dude.
|
01-30-13 10:32am
|
Reply
136
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I always check it out when I'm here, and post occasionally.
|
01-30-13 10:18am
|
Reply
137
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Nice review Exotics! I checked out the network, and it looks interesting. I actually like one of the other girls (Hunter Leigh) the best, although Bryci does have a nice pussy. It would be nice if they had more girls with natural boobs.
I appreciate the webmaster responding to all reviews here, even when the reviewers are only bitching and moaning. BellaNetwork, have you considered modifying the download limit to allow a greater limit in the first few days and first week that someone joins? I know my downloading is heaviest at any site I join in the first week I'm there, and I think that's probably true for most others also.
The lack of zips for the photos would be an issue for me too. Very few sites take that approach. BellaNetwork, I know its gotta be frustrating to see your content posted somewhere illegally, but this doesn't seem to be an issue for most websites. We've had this discussion on the forum, and the general consensus seems to be that people who download pirated content wouldn't pay for a membership anyway, so you're really not losing anything. Just speaking for myself, I don't have the time to go searching all over the net looking for free content (especially since there are usually viruses and malware where u find it); I am more than happy to pay the monthly fee and get it from the legitimate source.
If you had zips and a few more girls with natural tits, I'd try the network for a month. Hopefully you plan to add more girls.
|
01-28-13 05:32am
|
Reply
138
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
Met-Art, Nubiles, Femjoy, and Karups PC are the sites I'm either a member at or I go back to once a year, plus I have another half dozen that I wanna get back to including ALS Scan and Sapphic Erotica. So much porn, so little time!
|
01-27-13 07:03am
|
Reply
139
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Comment
Thanks for the link cjd. Holly Randall is definitely something different for Met-Art. It will be interesting to see how they redesign the site. Did you also see they are now managing ALS Scan and Viv Thomas? I had never heard of xbiz.com--very cool site.
|
01-25-13 05:27pm
|
Reply
140
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
Great review Squirrel! The current 9.95 promo is very tempting. I'm not big on tattoos either--at least not to the extent that many American porn models go with them. A nice tramp stamp or one or two small tatts isn't so bad--but it often goes far beyond that. I especially hate tatts near the pussy. I think most American girls who decide to get into porn have already been "bad girls" for a few years before they do, so 99 out of 100 already have them when they walk through the door. I doubt if the sites require it. I just wish there was some way to make todays young women understand that there really are a lot of guys out there who prefer natural bodies with no tatts or fake tits.
|
01-25-13 04:51pm
|
Reply
141
|
N/A
|
Reply of
bibo's Poll
I'm currently a member at one bikini site, and will join another one soon. I don't really think of it as a fetish, and I doubt most people would. But bikini swimsuits or panties have always got my motor running! Its the only "thing" I have that could be considered a fetish.
|
01-25-13 04:30pm
|
Reply
142
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I usually check a couple of sites in the morning to see if anything is worth downloading, then do a bit of downloading almost every day after work. When I find something I like, I'll watch it. Sometimes I download stuff but don't unzip it or watch it.
|
01-23-13 06:48am
|
Reply
143
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually subscribe to solo girl photo video sites, but I do like an occasional change. Things can get a bet stale if you only use a half dozen sites or so. This year I am making a point of subscribing to a different site each month just to mix it up a bit. But its still going to be the same general type of porn I prefer. There are some niches that don't interest me at all (like anal, gonzo, BDSM).
|
01-21-13 08:29am
|
Reply
144
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Thanks for the info Skippy!
|
01-20-13 09:13pm
|
Reply
145
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
JohnnyB's Review
Thanks for the update on this site. Looks like the webmaster still hasn't learned how to treat members. When someone pays for a membership, they expect to be able to download content. Not a difficult concept.
|
01-20-13 05:19pm
|
Reply
146
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Valid point Drooler, and I get what you're saying. I prefer to watch a girl masturbate with her fingers, but I like occasional toy use, especially with glass dildos and those clear plastic ones like this model was using. And I much prefer when they hold the toy by reaching under their thigh. I doubt that Femjoy will go overboard with it, and I agree with you that many sites do.
|
01-20-13 06:07am
|
Comment
147
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
01-20-13 05:15am
Replies (10)
|
Reply
148
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I would say no in almost all cases. First of all, it's non-physical--you haven't even touched the girl. Secondly, most private chats on cam sites consist of some variation of the girl stripping and then masturbating with fingers or toys--albeit this is at your direction, but its still fairly standard "porn", and nothing more. Finally, its very unlikely that the model has any real emotional feelings toward you, other than perhaps maybe she likes you better than some of the other guys she interacts with. So, while you might have a "thing" for the model, she probably doesn't feel anything for you. On the other hand, it is possible for a "relationship" with a cam model to morph over time into something more like what you might get at an online dating site. In that case, it could be considered a non-physical form of cheating.
|
01-19-13 06:40pm
|
Comment
149
|
Microminimus
(0)
|
|
01-18-13 04:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
150
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Excellent review skippy! I checked out the free tour, and noticed that one of my favorite girls has a ton of photo sets. Did you say that the videos are just a few minutes long?
|
01-18-13 06:43am
|
