Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I've never seen any and I've never looked for any. Never will either.
|
05-09-18 03:14pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I never had the opportunity. I grew up in a deeply conservative place and any porn would be run out of town quickly. And now with the availability of internet porn I have no need to go to a theater.
|
05-06-18 10:06am
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I agree that it's tricky, but for me it diminishes the fantasy.
|
05-04-18 07:46am
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
^ Interesting points. I'm glad you made them.
|
04-26-18 05:27pm
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most don't look natural. As a fan of small breasts I am resoundingly opposed to boob jobs!
|
04-17-18 05:23pm
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I have nothing against seeing a man go down on a woman but it just isn't easy to film. An exception is with girl/girl stuff. It's still not easy to see or film but it looks great!
|
04-09-18 01:27pm
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I have a dark secret. I own the Jenna Haze Fleshlights of her vagina and ass. I don't use them often but holy fuck they are pretty amazing. I'd recommend a Fleshlight to anyone.
|
04-08-18 02:21pm
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Poll
I'll occasionally view porn on my iPad if I'm travelling.
|
03-31-18 07:28am
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I love this niche. I wish more US sites did it. I miss Jurassic Cock.
|
03-28-18 04:02pm
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I avoid that when I can. It's a last line of communication. I've had to call a real person mostly when on three occasions over the past few years a membership was hacked (not my card) and used for online chats or webcams. Each time that got resolved quickly. But I'd still rather not have to deal with things that way. Some of the questions are inevitable but still embarassing:
Them: What site have you joined Sir?
Me: Ummm... that'd be "Pee on my Skinny Teen Ass."
Ugh!
|
03-26-18 01:30pm
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
That, sir, is funny!
|
03-26-18 01:26pm
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
They do affect my decision. As merc77 says, if they can't even have decent advertising why would we trust them about what's inside?
A close relative to the broken link are thumbnails on even the first tour page that link to the 'join' page. I'm not buying a membership without a pretty good idea of what they have to offer.
|
03-13-18 01:47pm
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
I selected 'no' but the answer is probably 'maybe.' If I couldn't see a listing of scenes but I had trustworthy advice that there was something in there I'd like then I'd still join. (Depending on the biller, of course.) If it had a good review here or if someone here mentioned a scene that sounded interesting then I'd take the plunge.
On the other hand, I have been interested in joining many sites and I've clicked on a link for 'videos' or 'models' and been take directly to the join page instead. If you're not even willing to let me see who the models are on your site before I buy then your site isn't for me.
|
02-23-18 10:40am
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
I remember once that a communications professional describe Twitter as 'the angriest place on the planet.' I don't have a twitter account and while my wife created a FB account for me I've never been on it.
|
02-19-18 04:28pm
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
My porn collection is all about the models. While there are some positions that I really like (standing anal and anal-on-belly being two of them) I don't specifically need to see those in every scene.
|
02-18-18 07:37am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Poll
I'm indifferent but would lean to allowing them because we have shown ourselves to be a pretty reasonable group. But then again, politics is so polarized today it may be hard for some to remain civil.
A good rule that was always imposed in the officer's mess in Canada, and I assume elsewhere, is that talk of politics or religion was distasteful and shouldn't happen.
|
02-14-18 12:33pm
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Onyx's Poll
Still too early for me.
|
02-12-18 05:02pm
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
I loooove braces! Braces are one of the few things I flag in my collection when I'm cataloging it.
|
02-11-18 10:58am
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
"... trying to help." LOL! I'm sure you'd agree that most women wouldn't see it that way. :-)
|
02-07-18 01:17pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'm neither for or against it. I've subscribed to sites like Throated that feature it but I also have joined sites with sensual blowjobs. I'm not a huge fan of spit-soaked blowjobs though, but given how popular those are I must be in the minority.
|
02-07-18 01:16pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
A long winter nap for me...
|
01-31-18 01:59pm
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with what Jay G wrote. That's my case too. I don't need discounts but they heavily influence my buying decisions.
|
01-27-18 05:01am
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
Reply of
merc77's Reply
I don't remember the title of the two movies I first bought, but it would have been in 1984 or 1985. It wasn't legal to sell, buy or possess in Canada at the time. I don't know how I found this out, but a stereo shop down the road sold bootlegged VHS copies for $30 each. I distinctly remember one of the scenes but the title is lost to the mists of time...
|
01-25-18 04:58pm
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
Reply of
merc77's Poll
VHS for me. I was aware of the 8mm format since it was advertised in magazines but the chances of successfully ordering an 8mm film and having it get across the border into Canada was about zero. Then again, having it delivered to my parent's house wouldn't have been a good idea either. VHS ruled my collection for about 10 years before DVDs took over. Every day I say a prayer of thanks for the modern internet and digital technology.
|
01-25-18 04:56pm
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I don't think my reviews are any better or worse than most other reviewers here, but like a lot of regulars I do take them seriously and put some effort into them. I'm not alone in this, because there are a lot of good reviewers here, but I appreciate reviews that are detailed and objective. I don't mind low or high scores as long as they are explained and justified.
As for objective, I recall that last summer marcdc1 reviewed Kink Men even though he's a straight guy. I think that is exactly what I mean when I say I prefer objective reviews. Kink Men was included in his Kink membership and it could use a review so he did it. He didn't have to like the porn to write an objective review. I thought that was a fantastic thing for him to do.
|
01-23-18 04:16pm
|