| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Colette
(0)
|
Reply of
BrighamXart's Reply
Thanks for the thorough response.
Yes, it looks like the model pages have been fixed, and other info has been corrected. Most importantly you've proved that you listen to your members, and that's fantastic.
Keep up the good work!
|
04-13-15 03:14pm
|
Review
2
|
Colette
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ High quality photography/videography
+ Beautiful Models who seem to like what they do
+ Good genre combination leaning to more group sex situations
+ Length of videos seems just right
+ Commentary/Interview videos for a behind the scenes look at the models |
| Cons: |
- Relatively small content library (they are new though)
- Details are not attended to:
- inaccurate descriptions by Colette
- sometimes certain downloads don't work
- Every video appears to be 16:03 long because cause they use a boiler-plate header for their videos
- No search capability
- Support staff don't respond to all emails (have to nag)
- Slightly "shady" tactics to make the site seem to have more content and higher ratings than it does:
- new content instantly has lots of 10 star ratings. hmmmm
- comments are overly moderated - have to keep it bright or they don't allow it.
- content will be out for weeks, then suddenly the release date is changed to make it seem like it's "new" again. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's basically x-art.com with more of a hardcore porn edge. The quality is high due to very beautiful models, good lighting/production quality but mainly because the models seem to be genuinely enjoying themselves.
I wish they'd realize that it's okay to focus on quality rather than quantity. As far as quantity goes the ste launched in late November and as of March 17, 2015 I count 28 content vids, 13 commentary videos, and 29 photo sets. So roughly that's something to see about every other day (either a photo set or video).
I wanted to give them an 80 or higher - but until they fix some of the "low hanging fruit" - I can't really recommend the site.
They should make their processes streamlined so that model pages have photos and decent content, not just blank. (Kinda sloppy). And one example of a bad description is one where she describes a scene with anal - but there is none in the video. (see "Give in") - However, to their credit, it's still a great video with Caprice and Marcello!
But what rubs me the wrong way is their tactics of changing dates, padding ratings, and overly moderating comments. I mean I understand getting rid of trolling or something harsh towards a model, but they way over do it. I can understand throwing a few 10 star ratings to get the ratings started - but they overdo it, so the ratings I found are pretty much worthless. But changing dates to me seems like a desparate move to try once again to deceive - make it look like there's more activity than there is.
So in summary, if you can see past obvious desperation, lack of good business practices and lack of attention to detail on the site itself - the content is really good. It's a shame because if they gave it to people straight, gave the same level of focus to the site as they do to their actual content - I could really recommend it. I hope things improve or I won't renew. |
|
03-17-15 10:55am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Usually, it's a combination of dimensions, bitrate, and the original source capture (camera) being in high definition. Usually with those 3 you will get a "Hi-Def" picture.
You can pump up the dimensions and bitrate of a crappy source (like an old VHS tape), despite a big file, it won't be real hi-def cause the source isn't hi-def.
Or, you can have a hi-def capture, and high dimensions, but if the bitrate is low, you'll have blocky/blurry/aliased picture - won't look good.
All three are important for a good hi-def picture... but typically with higher bit rates and resolution, you get a increasingly large file. Many productions will say 1080p... but with a lower bit rate, it won't look as good as it could.
|
02-04-14 09:56am
|
Review
4
|
Lust Cinema
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good content - Videos and Films tend to show more realistic sex, passionate and/or kinky scenarios.
- Great for couples - Wide breadth of genres and styles that will appeal to women and couples.
- Unique collection - "Alternative Porn" Films with various styles from the 70's to today, international, and unique films.
- Groupings by Director - You can learn a little bit about the director and the direction he/she took - and see other films by the same director. There are even some "making of" type content that can give further insight into the porn business.
- Educational Titles - Again for the couple or curious... educational type films you won't find on a typical porn site. |
| Cons: |
- Technical issues:
1. A few videos are ripped from disc poorly. They used handbrake and didn't de-comb some of the video. Still watchable - just not very professional.
2. Pictures from scenes are tiny. Thumbnails of pictures don't open to a larger version. Got no response from support on this... it does seem to be an oversight.
3. The site gave me errors on multiple occasions. 500 errors, or sometimes 404 (file not found) errors. I learned through trial and error that trying again would usually work - but you expect more in 2014... took me back to 1994 type site. Support wasn't very helpful here either.
4. Downloading the files was glitchy. Filenames aren't unique.
- Language issues - While most are either english, or at least sub-titled. A few aren't.
- Pictures are scarce . It's Lust CINEMA - so I can say this is minor, but they didn't try very hard on this end. One title had a picture associated with it that didn't belong with it. Most titles don't have pics. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you can see past a few technical issues and "lack of spit and polish" on the site in general, I can say I'm pleased overall with the content. It's unique, fresh, and opened me up to some porn that is different that I may have never found before.
There are even a few scenes that are softcore - so it may be a good site for a couple experimenting with porn. As Erica Lust claims "[Lust Cinema]... where the feminine viewpoint is vital, the aesthetic is a pleasure to all of the senses, and eroticism and innovation are celebrated" I find they've managed to capture a collection that meets these goals.
I must mention as well that the site brings 2 new films a month. Since these are typically FILMS and not simply a sex scene like most porn sites... there's a bit of give and take there. If you expect a large quantity of porn - this may not be for you... especially if you like to download your porn. (This proved to be possible, but problematic)
So the content makes up quite a bit of ground for a technically inferior site and rather disappointing support. The content is very unique, varied, and entertaining - and squarely aimed at women and couples. I can recommend the site for the content, but they need to improve the many quirks and attend to the details before I could fully recommend it. |
|
01-15-14 07:36am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Spending quality time... whatever that may mean to her. If you don't know - then get to know her better. Pay attention to her, and her needs. It's a slow warm up - you can't expect it right away.
If you over-think it, you are probably sabotaging your efforts.
|
10-08-13 11:03am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
I'm interested to how long it took you to get to that point.
I have a fairly large collection, and collecting for me is fun... but I'm realizing it takes time to keep things organized, so I'm thinking: fuck it - what if I just stopped collecting! There's always going to be new porn to look at... why waste my time? (and a collection takes at least some time perpetually... hard drives don't last forever)
I guess is porn really just disposable?
|
10-07-13 02:15pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I'm right there with you Jay G. I've seen collections come and go. I've never understood why collecting seems to be more of a drive than watching. I guess I don't understand certain fetishes I have either. Cheers!
|
10-07-13 02:09pm
|
Reply
8
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
Nasos's Comment
Good to know! Thanks so much for this info.
|
09-30-13 03:29pm
|
Review
9
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Large database of content. The scope of content here is huge!
- Great diversity of sites and content. Many kinks to choose from.
- Organized by Site, Model, Kink/Category, Network, etc... Good search functions.
- Beautiful models - You'll probably find some of your favorites here.
- Loyalty "Locker" to keep your favorite scenes indefinitely. |
| Cons: |
- Many channels haven't been touched in years. Many get very few updates.
- Much of the old stuff doesn't compete with today's standards.
- They re-hash their content (IE: "Best of " series)
- The sort by rating seems to be rigged or not working properly.
- Overall scene quality and diversity seems to be waning over time. |
| Bottom Line: |
While I've been a member for some time, I think I'm going to move on to greener pastures. While there is some great stuff here, Keep that in mind that channels dry up, and new Networks (like 21Naturals for instance) may appear that require a separate subscription.
While in the past I would have given this site a higher rating, they seem to be going downhill a bit.
The large library with some decent quality scenes are here and worth considering - just realize it may take some digging. |
|
09-30-13 03:25pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
10
|
Sex Art
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Couple friendly porn - Some of the scenes on this site are my wife and I's favorites!
They treat the male models as people as well. They actually get a model page.
Good diversity for this genre - They seem to use different people that give good diversity to this style of porn.
Photo set with most every video! |
| Cons: |
It's hard to put this in cons - but because of the diversity of creators - at time there are scenes that are just dull.
No EASY way to find scenes by kink or category. There is a user submitted function - but I would like some effort put in by SexArt to categorize a bit. |
| Bottom Line: |
While the content is more hit and miss than other sites, you get a lot of bang for your buck here due to the daily high quality updates, and some of the best unique, sexy, couple-friendly porn out there! The site is easy to use, easy to download and they pay attention to the details to make it a great site! |
|
09-30-13 03:10pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
11
|
X-Art
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
High Quality - From the sets, the sex, and the video from a technical standpoint (1080p clear video).
Original Content - Great stuff only found here.
Great models - They obviously have good taste.
Couple Friendly - Scenes my wife and I can enjoy together.
Interesting scenes - They can keep me interested with a variety of new ideas. |
| Cons: |
Watching from an iPad, the site times out after 15 minutes (some vids are 20mins) - so you have to go back, and re-queue and find your spot. Seems like a technical oversight they could fix.
Organization isn't good - seems like manual updates and not a very "searchable" database of content (ie; no keywords)
Updates are either a photo set or a video - and it's mixed up - you may see the video for a scene, then the pics a month later, or not at all.
This may seem petty but while Colette is fun and means well, she gets a bit cheesy and has tons of spelling errors in posts - takes away from the shine a bit. |
| Bottom Line: |
Well worth the subscription. While they could get a better "database" driving the site, and focus on a bit on the polish of the site - the content is unmistakably fresh, sexy and among the best quality out there. |
|
09-30-13 02:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's important to keep my drives encrypted with different (and complex) passwords than the one used to access my computer.
Privacy is a concern, and knowing a minor couldn't access are the factors that drive this policy for me.
|
09-30-13 02:43pm
|
Reply
13
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Ed Freiland's Reply
Ya the new 21Naturals has some pretty good stuff, but it's just starting and I paid annually (to my disappointment just before 21Naturals was released) for the 21Sextury subscription and I'm not going to pay again (double) my purchase to get 2 more channels. Especially since that money goes a lot further in other sites I've subscribed to (Ironically ones you seem to be imitating with 21Naturals). You should have worked harder to keep what you have happy instead of showing what looks like greed by creating yet another avenue for you to collect money while disappointing those who have been loyal.
In my opinion "The best of" releases makes searches more complicated, and seems a desperate ploy to re-hash your back content to look like there's more going on than there really is.
At this time I will not be renewing my subscription. Sad to see you go since you were once so great. Hopefully you can figure it out.
|
09-30-13 02:36pm
|
|
