Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-26-1704:07am (Update History) Reason: After spending more time on the site, I decided the site merits a higher score. The site does most everything right for what it is.
Pros:
• $20.95 for 1 month with PU discount, recurring at $29.95.
• RocketPay and Epoch are the credit card processors, trusted companies.
• Although various sizes, quality of images is high resolution, jpeg.
• A random selection of videos (mp4) indicates 720. While remastered and not true HD, they are of good quality considering their age.
• 1,189 photo sets (detailed below) which translates to about 60,000 photos.
• 55 DVDs and nearly 900 video scenes.
• Updating at about 1 DVD per week along with regular scene updates.
• Streaming and downloading; full DVDs and scenes can be streamed.
• No buffering issue with streaming; good streaming quality.
• Models look more natural compared to today’s state of affairs.
Cons:
• Pre-checked cross-sell at signup.
• Membership does not include access to any other sites in the Private network.
• DVDs cannot be downloaded – streaming only.
• Poor organization of videos, see comments.
• Nonsensical file naming scheme.
• Basic search only, i.e., no category search.
• Non HTTPS
Bottom Line:
For those not familiar, a little background. Private Classics is a part of the Private Media Group which was founded in Sweden in 1965. Its magazine was the first color hardcore magazine. The first intercourse scene was published in 1967 which was groundbreaking in paving the way for explicit porn. Private is known for high budget videos and has won major AVN awards. The “Classics” site is for those looking for nostalgia. I was pleasantly surprised by the high quality explicit photos from the magazine. The was a more innocent time in porndom. Private seems to have been in a class by itself in that it combined explicit smut with high-end production values.
The photos are probably the main attraction with the videos and digitized magazines the icing on the cake. There are three distinct sections: videos, photos and magazines. Although any one of these sections could probably have gotten by as a distinct site, they are interrelated. The videos are from the ‘90s or early ‘00s while the magazine and photos span 4 decades from the 60s to the 00s.
The site is well organized and is generally simple to navigate once you get the hang of it. The videos, photo sets and magazines are separated by menu sections. The photos and magazines are then further segregated by decade. There is also a model section (which can be viewed any one of 3 ways) which includes all the content for each model, i.e., videos and photos. There is also a brief comment about the model as well as her vital statistics.
The video organization is confusing. I never completely figured out the distinction between the two video sections offered, “Movies” and “Scenes.” The “Movies” section lists the DVDs and you can stream the entire DVD. On the same page are scenes from the DVD which are available for download and streaming. The “Scenes” section seems to be a duplication of the content in the “Movies” section though there seems to be more scenes in the “Scenes” section. There is no explanation on the site for the distinction. After a while and only by scrutinizing, I noticed some differences. Regardless, there is no point in having 2 video sections.
Another peeve, though minor, is with the ordering of the DVDs and scenes. The “Movie” section (DVDs) seems to have no rhyme or reason to the manner which DVDs are listed, like chronologically. The “Scenes” section seems to list scenes in order of date added regardless of when they were filmed. However, it is not a major issue since all the videos are from the 1990s or early ‘00s.
There is only one download option for the videos though there’s no indication of the quality. A random selection of videos shows them to be 720. However, since the videos are about 20 years old, they were obviously remastered and the quality is not true HD. All things considered though, the quality is satisfactory (full screen with a 27" monitor).
The videos reflect the magazine. The action is hardcore and varied including lesbian, straight, orgies, blowjobs and anal. To the delight of some, there is an inordinate number of group scenes and plenty of anal. Scenes run from about 10 to 30 minutes with an average of 20 minutes. The videos are unlike other hardcore. They are unique in various ways – interesting locales like Mars [!!] coupled with above-average direction and camera-work. There are generally plots with at least an attempt at good acting. Most of the videos seem to be in French, many of which are dubbed in English. The models are European, good looking and seem to average in the upper 20s in age. The models have more of a natural look with a minimum of tattoos and silicone.
The photo sets are taken from the magazine. All the photos from the magazine seem to be in the photo section, so you can skip the, uh, intellectual articles in the magazine. However, don’t skip it! They are downloadable in PDF and pleasing to the eye. Looking at the old magazines was a blast.
Photosets are zipped and sets range from a handful of photos to over 100; I’ll guesstimate the average is 50 photos per set. As mentioned, photo quality is very good. A random spot check shows good compression quality. My abacus reveals the following statistics:
History was always a favorite subject. Private Classics is like a hot stroll down memory lane. Hosiery, high heels, honey bee hairdos, latex suits and natural breasts will take you back to a bygone era. This is a classy site and all 3 offerings - photos, magazines and videos, all merit praise. I found the Private material - magazines and videos, refreshing in that it was innovative, natural, shot in interesting places, and most of all, highly erotic Once you figure out the best way to use the site, there are a large library of photos, videos and magazine to keep you occupied endlessly.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Updated:
07-18-1605:13pm (Update History) Reason: I had a major gripe when I first joined. Video downloads were only in 480P. However, 2 days later they started offering high quality downloads.
Pros:
* Epoch is the biller
* Young, mostly cute Filipina models
* Minimum amount of tattoos
* Site owners / managers are very responsive to emails and concerns, a big plus.
* You're dealing with a small personalized site instead of a behemoth bureaucratic site.
* Downloads in 480p, 720p and 1080p
* With a $10 discount offer, I paid $19.95 recurring monthly. No problem cancelling
Cons:
* Videos not dated
* Not much variety, though that’s hard to avoid unless there are multiple directors.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed the site 2+ years ago. It was one of the first sites I reviewed and I was also inexperienced with porn sites. Now that I’m a little more savvy thanks to PU, I can shed a little more insight.
The premise - it’s about 2 or 3 Swedish (?) guys who travel the Philippines and film their sexual conquests. For the most part, they ride around in a Trike, which is something like a motorized tricycle, kinda like a motorcycle with 3 wheels and a backseat. They ride around looking for women to take back to their hotel. The women are amateurs - mostly young and pretty, though they’re bar girls or prostitutes. For the most part, most scenes seem realistic and unscripted. If this is not so, I would be surprised. Many of the women are very shy.
This is a refreshing change from most sites. Real women trying to get by. The Filipino culture is one to be admired. I visited the country twice and its people, especially the women, are its greatest asset.
The entire premise is fairly unique and one that I find very appealing. Scenes are mostly one on one hardcore, though there are some threesomes and a few anal scenes.
Last week I received an email from them announcing that downloads were back. As a result, I'm back after they went through a period of streaming only.
I would rejoin this site but it'll be a while. It doesn't seem that they update more than once every two weeks, though it's hard to tell since videos aren't dated.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Caveat: the only feature I use is ppm
-Good selection, wide variety from mainstream to amateur
-User reviews mostly helpful
-Easily navigable, better than any site I've seen
-Good quality
-Keeps track of when you last watched a movie
-competitively priced
-excellent tech support and customer service
Cons:
-I use a Mac. I have problems with movies in WMV and stopped watching them. This is with 2 different Macs.
-I prefer non-mainstream and foreign language movies. While they hotmovies has a fair share, there could be more.
Bottom Line:
I probably sound like I work for them. It's my one and only review and perhaps you think I'm a shill. I'm not, I promise. One of my issues is that I've used this site almost exclusively and have been a member for seemingly forever. They used to be called Abbey's something or other, which was strange. Anyway, I look at other sites, particularly the highly rated sites, and they don't seem to hold a candle to this site. Yet hotmovies is not a widely used site (at least judging from reviews) and the reviews in general are not great. I don't understand that but that's not my concern. I'm not trying to convert anyone. What I do need is some new blood cuz this site is starting to get old to me. I was hoping to find that here. If someone wants to comment on some other sites that have similar features to hotmovies, I'd very much welcome that. I haven't found any.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
• Realistic amateur casting site with inexperienced and mostly cute Czech babes
• Great layout – each video has a thumbnail photo along with tags to make it easy to decide whether the scene is of interest
• Large variety of women to suit most everyone’s taste
• Newer scenes (after 2015) are in ultra HD (or lower quality) / good streaming quality
• Exclusive content
• 1,885 scenes as of this writing
• 2 updates weekly
• Zip files for photo sets in high resolution; 360-degree view
• Czech dialogue with English subtitles
• Search feature fully functional
• CCBill is the processor
• Great customer service
Cons:
• Camera work is lacking
• Standalone site – it used to be part of the Czech AV network
• While not a big complaint, it’s a little pricey for a standalone site at $29.95 monthly recurring
• As with most sites, the scenes are formulaic and become tedious at times
Bottom Line:
Czech-casting is very much what one could hope for in a casting site. Realism, cute and inexperienced babes along with a simple but adequate website design.
The women seemed to come from every walk of life. 18-year-old students to 60-year-old grandmothers, thin to plump, pretty to not so pretty, etc. There are very few drop-dead gorgeous women. If you’re looking for that type of model, this site is not for you. There are plenty of glamour sites that fit the bill. What you get here is a realistic cross-section of women. But no worries, there are plenty of pretty girl next door types.
Each scene has the same setup, which at times can be monotonous. The scenes begin with the model seated and answering questions by an off-camera female. The questions are virtually identical, i.e., name, age, where from and then it gets more and more personal. For the most part, I liked this segment since the responses are varied and often interesting. However, it takes up about half of the video, too long.
Then there’s a brief segment consisting of posing where the model strips naked. Last is the “money” scene, either softcore or hardcore. You’ll know beforehand what you’re in for from the tags on the thumbnail that you click to download or stream. The scenes, whether hard or soft, follow a similar formula. There’s only a few male actors and they dictate the scene’s direction which is similar from one scene to the next.
It’s been 5 years since I was a member and was hesitant to rejoin. The earlier stuff consists only of a small percentage of hardcore and virtually nothing in the way of fetishes, i.e., anal, lesbian, threesomes, etc. That’s all changed. The majority of scenes since 2016 are hardcore and there’s a fair amount of anal, some threesomes and even a number of scenes including pissing.
I also wasn’t thrilled that they’re no longer part of Czech AV, a network of 30 something Czech sites. But the quantity as well as quality of the scenes in Czech-casting mitigated that somewhat.
I didn’t use the search feature very much, but it seemed to work fine. Searching for a model is pointless since each model only performs one scene, at least from what I can tell. But searching tags, i.e., hardcore or anal, will get good results.
I can’t speak highly enough about customer service. I had a problem with download speed. I received quick responses to emails (bearing in mind that they’re in the Czech Republic) as well as expert help. They had a tool to diagnose the problem and after a couple of days, it was solved. This is the type of support you get from a major company that values customer service.
In my view, the biggest and most avoidable drawback was the camera work. It seemed to be mostly POV or with a couple of cameras placed on tripods. I’ll also take them to task for the length of the interviews. They were far too long, and I found myself fast forwarding often. And my last peeve is the lack of originality in the “money” scene.
In the end, I have no hesitation in recommending this site for anyone that has any interest in the casting niche.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
• Epoch and CCBill are the credit card processors which translates to no problem
• No dl limit
• Exclusive content
• Secure site, uses https
• Unrehearsed
• Amateurs
• 2 streaming options, high and low definition
• HQ DL option – 720 and mp4’s (early videos are lesser quality)
• HQ photos
• Pages have informative write-ups about models, not the usual baloney
• Very nice and playful design which generally works well from a technical and visual standpoint
• Ability to add to favorites or like which enables you to track models
• No pre-checked cross-sells
Cons:
• Inability to view all content by individual model in one place
• Videos not dated, unable to determine update schedule though I’m guessing there’s 1 update weekly
• Only 1 DL option (though not a bad thing for me as 720 is just right for my needs)
• Photo sets not available for download, or at least I could not figure out how to do that
• Descriptions of early sets are in German
• A handful of broken links – error message indicates copyright issues
• Many videos do not have subtitles; at least one had subtitles in German
• No PU discount
Bottom Line:
I almost dismissed Ersties as a girl’s site. However, I came to realize it’s much more than a romantic semi-hardcore (and softcore) site geared for a predominantly female audience, although it does meet that criteria. Many of the scenes are downright hot and erotic. The “players” (that term seems more appropriate than “actors,”) are amateurs (not amateurish!) and seem to be enjoying themselves. However, if you’re looking for serious hardcore including anal or gonzo or various fetishes, Ersties isn’t for you.
Erst is German for one. I’m assuming the name of the site is a takeoff on first-time models. It is a German site run by a woman (Paulita Pappel) and manned [ahem] mostly by women. It features mostly German and other European amateur models and couples in unrehearsed sex. However, I did notice a few American sets. The models are mostly natural, pretty or ordinary next-door girl types. However, there are at least 3 models that are obese and probably not a turn on to too many people.
The site is made up of real people having fun, not actors doing stuff they don’t particularly like. The clear majority of the content – interviews and videos – seems completely unrehearsed including the occasional orgasm. There is nothing over the top, at least that I noticed, like threesomes or anal or other such hardcore. There are several orgy videos, but they’re about the tamest such scenes I’ve seen. And they have an almost believable plot! Most videos are solo, some containing only nudity. The rest are lesbian or couple. The earlier sets are mostly solo. I did an estimate of the types of videos based on a sampling, not all that scientific:
• Solo (masturbation or just nudity) – 65%
• Girl/Girl – 30%
• Girl/Boy and other – 5%
Navigation is weird, but not bad weird, just different. After a while, I grew to appreciate it. The best way to access content is through the “Updates” section. This option includes all the videos and photo sets on the site. To get to each of the 925+ sets, you click on a photo in the “Update” section and you are taken to a page with the model(s) relevant videos and pictures. In general, a set consists of a photo set (ranging from a handful of photos to up to 50) and videos. The videos include an interview video of the model or couple. It seems there’s one interview for each model or couple. The interviews are generally biographical and various sexual subjects are discussed. Unlike other sites, the interviews are not standardized or formulaic. Occasionally, the interview is the only video included in the set, which is strange. However, there are usually 1 to 3 (generally 2) more videos which contain solo (softcore or hardcore) or couple content.
Or you can go to the “All Models” option and scroll through the models. However, there’s a serious flaw in this section. While models may (and generally do) have more than one set, they are listed separately for each set in the “All Models” section. For example, if you want to see all of Rebecca’s videos, they’re not located in one place and you need to access them separately. The models are not listed in any order that I could discern, like alphabetical. However, you can use the search function to look for a specific model.
There is an option called “English” which I don’t quite understand. It’s laid out like the “All Models” section yet there are significantly less sets included. One can only conclude that these are English models, duh. However, it makes no sense to segregate only English.
There is a search function under the “All Models” and “English” options, though it seems limited to searching by model name or video title. Strangely, there is no search option in the “Updates” section.
There is also a cams section (labeled as new) and you can buy tokens on the site. The cost is about 10 cents a minute. It looked interesting if you’re into that sort of thing. I didn’t investigate.
Finally, there is an interesting section (labeled as new), “La Petite Mort.” As per Urban Dictionary, “The little death is translation from the French "la petite mort,” a popular reference for a sexual orgasm. The term has been broadly expanded to include specific instances of blacking out after orgasm and other supposed spiritual releases that come with orgasm.” When you click on the “La Petite..” option, you are taken to a page of 9 photo sets (6 photos each) of gorgeous women. There is also a video that can be downloaded in HQ and is up to 10 minutes in length. The videos depict the woman masturbating and having an orgasm, very hot. I’ll go out on a limb and assume this section will be updating since it is new.
Doing the math, not counting interview videos, there are probably close to 2000 videos of action. That’s calculated by multiplying 915+ sets by an average of 2 action videos and including the videos in the “Le Petite Mort” section. They all average about 15 minutes in length.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Cheap, cheap, cheap
[Just trying to make a point and probably the best reason for joining. At 49 cents a minute (if you spend $100), this is a fraction of the price of other cam sites, not that I am an aficionado of this stuff.]
* A good number of amateurs which is a plus and minus.
* Customer support is much improved. I've had several legitimate complaints about the girls over the years. I often get an apology, a credit and they kick the girl off the site.
* Mostly Eastern Europeans, Latinas and Filipinos - I never came across anyone from the US. I consider that a plus.
* A rating system that mostly works along with comments made by users. You have to take the comments with a grain of salt though, since some are bogus. But as a whole, they're helpful. There's also a 5 star rating system which is useful.
* Uses CC for credit cards - I never had an issue
* Half price specials every so often
Cons:
* It is not private chat and you start paying the moment you enter the girl's room. Some models ignore you (or don't notice you're there).
* Many of the models will drag on chatting as long as possible to maximize profits, no matter what you say, i.e., TAKE IF OFF B!THCH -- just joking. I can understand that but some are unreasonable. All the while, you're paying.
* Some models will only chat and it might take 5 minutes or more to realize that.
* The majority of models are 6 or under though there are 9+'s on there also.
* I've heard that management is late with payments to the models and is not a primary concern of theirs. This is an unsubstantiated rumor. The women only get half, the site gets the other half. And they get less if they're going through a sponsor's computer, which seems to be common. The low payments to the models may affect the quality of women and explain why there are no Americans.
Bottom Line:
To be clear, the high score given by me is based on both value and quality. If I had to break it down, it would be 100 for value and 70 for quality.
This site is modeled differently than other sites and I think it works. With other sites, at least the ones I'm aware of, you get to chat with the model before entering the room and start paying. But it's difficult to chat with a model when there are umpteen other people trying to do the same. There could be a dozen or so guys chatting along with you.
On Extasy, you go right into the room and start paying. Since it doesn't seem to be a very popular site, the models are often alone or with one other person. This is particularly true at off times, i.e., not the weekend. You generally get the same interaction here when you enter as you would if you entered a room in another site. The drawback of course, is that you don't have the opportunity before you start paying to judge the model. All in all, I think the system works as long as you keep in mind you're paying from the moment you enter the room and you take a few moments to look at the rating and reviews of the model.
I've been a member of this site for many years. I don't use it very much cuz as I said, cams aren't really my thing. So bear in mind, I am not all that familiar with the competition. However, I do enjoy it every so often. Usually, $100 worth of minutes will last a month or two or more.
Before entering a room, you get photos to look at and a quick live blurb. There's also a description written by the models which should be completely ignored. Many of them just use the same one the girl who occupies the room during the other shift uses. The best indicator if a model is good is the number of stars that users have given her and how many ratings she has. You get all this info before entering. For example, if someone has 5 stars and has only 1 rating, it's meaningless. It could be the sponsor who gave her the star. But if she's got 4 stars and 20 or more ratings, than you're chances are excellent of having a good experience.
I have mostly good things to say about my experience. I've come to understand the ratings which minimizes my chances of having a bad experience. I also have a rule of thumb that I give the woman no more than 5 minutes to show me she's serious. However, sometimes I don't mind just chatting and getting little exposure. I figure for the price, it's not a big deal.
I notice that many cam sites charge upwards of $1/minute. I would constantly be watching the clock if I was paying that. Here, I don't worry about it so much.
There is also the option of tipping (in minutes). Some models are aggressive about it saying they'll only do such and such for a tip. Mostly though, I rarely get asked for a tip though I make it a habit to leave one if deserved.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- drop dead gorgeous teens
- all exclusive, I think
- incredibly helpful customer service
- excellent production
Cons:
- poor searching features
- no categories, you choose a model and get to see the movies she's, though the photos pretty much tell you what you can expect
- the majority of videos are masturbation scenes and lesbian scenes, which many might take as a plus or a pro
Bottom Line:
I should preface my review that I have a preference for South American young wimmin. I emailed them to ask if this what the site was all about and I was told about 80% are filmed in SA. Based on that, I joined. To my dismay, there was no searching tool to pick out the SA videos, and the hard core, i.e., non-masturbation or lesbo videos.
I emailed to ask about this and incredibly, the CSR send me a list of links, about 70, that fit my description. Wow, I never expected such service!
They upload a few videos a week, not worth it for a recurring membership, but definitely worthwhile if you like gorgeous amateur teens.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Women are young and mostly gorgeous
-Although most seem to be pros, many still seem like the gal next door (in the PI) - shy and amateurish. [this may be a con for some.]
-no San Fernando glitz or overproduction
-generally good quality and production
Cons:
- a recurring membership is not worth it
- scenes generally follow the same pattern (only a few guys) and it gets tiresome
- just a handful of anal scenes
- group scenes, FFM, seem forced
Bottom Line:
Reality filipino porn shot by Swedish guys. The premise is to go around in a trike (a filipino taxi) and pick up girls off the street... mostly. Although it seems to be entirely shot in Angeles City, known for its pickup bars and prostitution, the girls are mostly pros, and they seem to enjoy what they are doing with little acting.
There are a decent number of videos, all about 25 minutes, which I managed to download in a month. There's only 1 upload per week, so it doesn't pay to shell out roughly $30/mo. for 4 or 5 downloads. I suggested restructuring their pricing but I was told they have tried different billing models and full price each month works best for them.
Which leads me to - they are very approachable and support is excellent. Highly recommended.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
• Over 1000 videos / photo sets available
• No censorship / pixilation
• English subtitles
• 2-day trial membership available; all membership options include access to the entire network
• Variety of payment options including Epoch, JAVbill and Segpay for credit card processing
• Streaming and downloads available. Fast download speeds.
• Good streaming quality – HD
• Most downloads available in HD with two other lesser formats available
• Photos have good resolution with 2 different download options (zip)
• Daily uploads
• Good search features – in advanced search, you can type in keywords
• There is a favorites feature so you can return to any video easily
Cons:
• Not all content exclusive
• While this is certainly a plus for others, there are too many extended BJ scenes for my taste.
• Some of the scenes are downright ridiculous and require a sense of humor. This is both a plus and minus, mostly a minus for humorless me ;).
Bottom Line:
[In my opinion, the Japan HDV network is amazing in most every respect. Not only are all 7 sites winners as far as content, but they also contain most of the small and not so small qualities that are just as important to the overall experience, i.e., video/photo quality (though that varies somewhat), searching features, organization, support, etc.
I’m prefacing all my reviews of the 7 sites with the following caveat. For all intents and purposes, 3 of the sites are virtually identical in type of content – Japan HDV, AV Idolz and JAV HQ. The entire network is similar in format and structure. After some consideration, I decided to do separate reviews instead of one overall review since 4 of the sites are vastly different in content. However, because of the similarities, some of the reviews are repetitive. It’s a great network and IMO, the best JAV network, plus you get a bonus of a very hot Thai site.]
This is the network’s premier site and boasts a variety as well as an abundance of videos and photos including bukkake, group sex, BJ’s, hardcore… you name it. Good uncensored Japanese sites seem to be a rare commodity and Japan HDV is the best Japanese site I’ve come across. The site is extremely well-organized as noted above. Some may find the Japanese taste a little strange and over the top with too much focus on toys, bukkake, outdoor and zany scenes. However, there’s enough assortment to please most anyone with an affinity towards Japanese women. The women are mostly good looking model types. While I am not familiar with who’s who in the porn industry, many of the faces are familiar and at least some of the content is not exclusive. I didn’t find much to criticize.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Uncensored as in no mosaic
* Gorgeous wimmin - I'm not knowledgeable enough to know the amateurs from pros, but I'm guessing they were mostly pros
* HD video quality
* No download limit
* large collection of videos, about 1000
* About 25 Hentai videos, though that's not my thing
* Good value for money, $29.95. No problem with canceling... I'm not familiar with the credit card processor but it was not an issue.
Cons:
* I found it very odd that the videos are all long, averaging about 90 minutes. They're mostly of one model in different scenes. I would have preferred downloading scenes and being able to pick and choose.
* Although there is a main menu and another one for categories, in reality, almost every video could fit into many of the categories. This is because of the length of the videos, sometimes more than 2 hours, and many scenes. Also, I found that the categories were not always accurate. I could find no anal in a number of the videos in this category.
* Some of the Japanese oddities are a negative for me but will be a plus for others... I think toys are overused and I'm not into bukkake. Virtually every video contains one or more of such scenes.
* I would have liked to see more amateurs.
* Why do "threesomes" almost always mean 2 guys and a gal for the Japanese? I rarely see it the other way around and YES is no exception. I can recall only one such scene.
Bottom Line:
Frankly, I've never come across such a wealth of uncensored and gorgeous Japanese wimmin. However, my experience is limited. This is one of my all time favorite sites now despite its shortcomings. I was able to download every video in less than 3 weeks with my upgraded internet speed, so it really was a bargain. Fyi, the videos amounted to over 1TB. There was only one update of about 8 videos in the 18 or 19 days I've been a member.
I had no interest in the photos, hence they're not reviewed.
There are no bonus sites but the abundance of content here makes that more than forgivable. Besides, I've found that bonus sites are generally useless fluff.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
• Very large and comprehensive photo section dating back over 100 years.
• Includes probably some of the oldest photos and smut videos available, though it’s unlikely that they are exclusive.
• No pre-checked cross-sell.
• CCBill and Epoch are two of the processors, though I had issues with CCBill. See comments.
• Streaming for most videos is available plus unlimited downloads.
• Meaningful file names for most videos which includes year of release in the name most of the time.
• For its time, good video and photo quality. Videos remastered in digital avi or mp4 format, though only 1 DL option. The old stuff was undoubtedly shot mostly in 8mm or16mm. Photos show little wear and tear, i.e., scratches.
• Daily updates.
• Free 1-day trial with full access – however, see comments.
• Each video lists the stats, i.e., year, format, size, duration, resolution and date added.
• HTTPS.
Cons:
• A huge drawback: photo content only available as individual downloads.
• Viewing option for photos is laborious and antiquated.
• Not really a con because It’s unavoidable but I’ll mention it so that there aren’t any unrealistic expectations – although digitized, the videos are low quality as are the older photos.
• No search tools.
• Poor navigation.
• Signing up was fraught with problems, see comments. However, I did get a discounted price of $15.95 recurring at $15.95 – regular price is $29.95 recurring at $29.95.
Bottom Line:
Pornography has a long and rich history. One of the earliest pieces of evidence dates back 25,000 years! A 4” statue of Venus of Willendorf dating back to that period was discovered in Austria. There is further evidence of statues and explicit images throughout ancient times. A major game changer was the invention in 1440 of the Gutenberg Press. As a result, the first book of erotic engravings was published in 1524. Then came the invention of photography in 1839 which basically ushered pornography into today’s modern era. That is roughly where Vintage Cuties begins its foray into porn, a.k.a., smut, dirt, erotica, filth.
Vintage Cuties may be the only site you’ll ever need for a titillating reference of what I’ll loosely refer to as modern porn, the era following the invention of photography. The site includes a vast photo collection as well as an abundance of videos from 1850 to the 1990s. At least some of the content is member submitted. While the quality of the photos and videos reflects the standards of the time, the content on VC seems mostly free of excessive wear and tear, i.e., scratches. Of course, the quality of the content from 30+ years ago seems primitive by today’s HD standards. But alas, that is part of the charm.
There are several other sites included with membership but they warrant no attention. They are unrelated to vintage porn. While the content is mostly current (within 10 years), quality and content lack any redeeming values. For example, there’s a site “Home Made Junk,” an apt title, and consists of poor quality photos and short poor quality videos. These sites detract from the main site and I recommend not spending more than a few minutes, if that much, checking them out.
The site is painful to navigate. Hitting the back button doesn’t always take you to the last page viewed. It sometimes took 4 or so clicks to get back to the menu. This is frustrating. On a similar note and another major drawback is the lack of any search feature. However, there is an extensive menu.
The photos are the real draw, at least for me. This is an enormous section consisting of 200,000 photos (as per the site) and one which you can spend days going through. However, it is unforgivable that the files are not zipped and you cannot download the sets, only individual photos.
The oldest photos date back to 1850 and were shot using t process known as daguerreotype, a photograph taken by the earliest photographic process introduced in 1839 employing an iodine-sensitized silvered plate and mercury vapor.
As mentioned, the menu is extensive and logical. The photo section includes many subsets. They’re separated by date range (1850 - 1920, 1920 - 1940, 1940 – 1950, 1950 – 1970, 1970 – 1980 and 1980 – 1990). There are different subsets under each period. For example, under 1850 – 1920, subsets include daguerreotypes, erotica, fetish, filthy, risqué cards and world people. In case you’re wondering, the “filthy” stuff is the hardcore smut, “erotica” consists simply of nudes, “fetish” is mostly spanking and bondage, “world people” consists generally of Africans and “risqué cards” which are simply nude photos. Each period has different subsets.
Also listed in the photos section after the options for date ranges are further options, some which only serve to confuse, others which are lots of fun. The options following the date range options are:
• Amateurs –1,000 photos from circa 1980s.
• Burlesque – 1,400 photos - the title says it all, undated but I’ll guess 1960s – 1980s
• Covers & Posters – 2,000 images of what seems to be entirely magazine covers apparrently from the 1950s – 1980s
• Exotic Art – 2,000 images of erotica drawings – again, undated but seemingly spans the early 20th century thru more modern times
• Magazines – 1,350 sets (~30,000 photos) with subsections by time period from 1880 to 1990. Some sets include only photos from the magazines and others seem to include the entire magazine. Very comprehensive and fun.
• Playing Cards – 360 images of, guess what? -)
• Retro Ads – over 100 sets (~5,000 images) of ads seemingly most from the 1950s, mostly nostalgic but not erotic. Remember Schlitz beer? Beech-nut gum?
• Retro Stars – 100s of mostly pinup models which tally several thousand photos - subsections by time period from the 1920s to 1980s. Retro stars include the likes of Josephine Baker (the oldest one and from 1920), Jean Harlow, Barbara Eden (clothed), Rita Moreno (clothed), Betty Blue, Anita Ekberg, Babette Bardot, Annie Sprinkle, etc. A fun section.
Unfortunately, viewing the photos is a tedious task. There is sort of a slide show feature but it’s not automatic and it’s time consuming. In addition, navigating to and from sets often requires several mouse clicks. I’m confused why they would have such a fantastic and enormous photo section with very limited viewing and download options.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
** Excellent customer service
** Epoch is the biller, canceling takes seconds
** It's a great deal with the discount - $4.95 monthly recurring at a higher price, I forget the amount. I would think twice if I had to pay full price of $29.95
** Exclusive content
** All amateur, no rock stars. I like that.
** The scene descriptions are quite lengthy like a blog entry, if you're into such things.
** Filming on locale, Thailand
** They now allow downloads. It was previously streaming only
** Users can rate scenes and post comments
Cons:
** Formulaic - seemingly only 2 male actors that never seem to vary the scenes. And they're often boring! They should hire me ;) It's hardcore sex, but nothing out of the ordinary. The few anal scenes are very poorly shot and the few thressomes (ffm) are very much staged.
** So-so camera work, often jerky. Big minus.
** Not a huge amount of content - 378 videos
** Updates seem haphazard, like about every 2 weeks
** No access to other Video Dream (VD) network sites, but for $4.95, who's complaining? Just mentioning it.
** Quality on older videos not up to snuff (but excellent quality on newer stuff). They advertise HD, though I wonder.
Bottom Line:
Tuk Tuk is a reality site shot in Thailand that focuses on street-pickups using tuk-tuks (instead of trikes as in Trike Patrol). However, the meetings are not always random and are pre-arranged.
Most of the girls are 18 to 25, some very beautiful and others average.
Tuk Tuk is very similar in concept and in other respects to the other VD sites that I have experienced, Asian Sex Diary and Trike Patrol. Crossover with actors, scenes that generally follow the same pattern, jerky camera work, blah blah. The three sites seem like one big site. This is okay by me since I love the concept, but I wish they would offer a package. Actually, the concept of Tuk Tuk is identical to Trike Patrol except it's the Thai version. Trike takes place in the Philippines.
Bottom line - if you like amateur Thais and reality videos featuring some many above average young women and you can overlook the drawbacks, the site is worth a month. The site is too small with updates too infrequent to justify more than a month periodically.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
• 2-day trial membership available; all membership options include access to the entire network
• Variety of payment options including Epoch, JAVbill and Segpay for credit card processing
• Streaming and downloads available. Fast download speeds.
• Good streaming quality – HD
• Most downloads available in HD with two other lesser formats available
• Photos have good resolution with 2 different download options (zip)
• Good search features – in advanced search, you can type in keywords
• There is a favorites feature so you can return to any video easily
Cons:
• Last update was May 2016
• Too many scenes of women with enhanced boobs, tattoos and dyed hair
• Not all content exclusive
Bottom Line:
[In my opinion, the Japan HDV network is amazing in most every respect. Not only are all 7 sites winners as far as content, but they also contain most of the small and not so small qualities that are just as important to the overall experience, i.e., video/photo quality (though that varies somewhat), searching features, organization, support, etc.
I’m prefacing all my reviews of the 7 sites with the following caveat. For all intents and purposes, 3 of the sites are virtually identical in type of content – Japan HDV, AV Idolz and JAV HQ. The entire network is similar in format and structure. After some consideration, I decided to do separate reviews instead of one overall review since 4 of the sites are vastly different in content. However, because of the similarities, some of the reviews are repetitive. It’s a great network and IMO, the best JAV network, plus you get a bonus of a very hot Thai site.]
I initially joined this site on a trial membership. I had no idea it was part of a network or that $4.95 got me full access to the entire network. Pay dirt! Unfortunately, there are only about 80 videos / photo sets available.
The site is extremely well-organized as noted above – the layout and features are ideal, i.e., search tools, layout, ease and speed of downloads, HD, etc. While there are a good many women who seem to be hardened pros, there are also many amateur and girl next-door types with natural everything. In my opinion, Thai women are among the most beautiful in the world and don’t need enhancements.
There is a fair share of anal and lesbian scenes, something not all that common in Thai porn except on the raunchiest sites. Most of the scenes feature these babes getting pounded by white guys. There’s very little pretense at a plot or storyline, something I miss. Bottom line good Thai sites are not easy to come by but Teen Thais does its share to fill the gap.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
• No censorship / pixilation
• 2-day trial membership available; all membership options include access to the entire network
• Variety of payment options including Epoch, JAVbill and Segpay for credit card processing
• Streaming and downloads available. Fast download speeds.
• A wide variety of bondage scenes
• Good streaming quality – HD
• Most downloads available in HD with two other lesser formats available
• Photos have good resolution with 2 different download options (zip)
• Good search features – in advanced search, you can type in keywords
• There is a favorites feature so you can return to any video easily
Cons:
• No updates since September 2016; site is probably dead.
• Only 34 videos / photo sets
Bottom Line:
[In my opinion, the Japan HDV network is amazing in most every respect. Not only are all 7 sites winners as far as content, but they also contain most of the small and not so small qualities that are just as important to the overall experience, i.e., video/photo quality (though that varies somewhat), searching features, organization, support, etc.
I’m prefacing all my reviews of the 7 sites with the following caveat. For all intents and purposes, 3 of the sites are virtually identical in type of content – Japan HDV, AV Idolz and JAV HQ. The entire network is similar in format and structure. After some consideration, I decided to do separate reviews instead of one overall review since 4 of the sites are vastly different in content. However, because of the similarities, some of the reviews are repetitive. It’s a great network and IMO, the best JAV network, plus you get a bonus of a very hot Thai site.]
A Japanese hardcore bondage site. Unlike some bondage sites, there’s plenty of sex, i.e., blowjobs and fucking. Extreme genres don’t interest me much but I found the site to have some excellent moments. It features all different types of bondage, not just the standard tie her up and stick a sock in her mouth, though it features lots of that. There’s multiple anal, vaginal enemas, clamping body parts and of course, lots of flogging and spanking. The site is extremely well-organized as noted above. Recommended for those not overly squeamish.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
• 2-day trial membership available; all membership options include access to the entire network
• Variety of payment options including Epoch, JAVbill and Segpay for credit card processing
• Streaming and downloads available. Fast download speeds.
• Approximately 700 videos / photo sets
• Good variety in types of scenes and nationalities
• Photos generally have good resolution with 2 different download options (zip)
• Good search features – in advanced search, you can type in keywords
• There is a favorites feature so you can return to any video easily
Cons:
• Not dated, no updates in the week I’ve been a member
• Download and streaming quality varies greatly ranging from HD to much lesser quality
• Camera work is often amateurish
• Many short videos - under 15 minutes
Bottom Line:
[In my opinion, the Japan HDV network is amazing in most every respect. Not only are all 7 sites winners as far as content, but they also contain most of the small and not so small qualities that are just as important to the overall experience, i.e., video/photo quality (though that varies somewhat), searching features, organization, support, etc.
I’m prefacing all my reviews of the 7 sites with the following caveat. For all intents and purposes, 3 of the sites are virtually identical in type of content – Japan HDV, AV Idolz and JAV HQ. The entire network is similar in format and structure. After some consideration, I decided to do separate reviews instead of one overall review since 4 of the sites are vastly different in content. However, because of the similarities, some of the reviews are repetitive. It’s a great network and IMO, the best JAV network, plus you get a bonus of a very hot Thai site.]
A real hodgepodge, about 60% softcore – masturbation, toys and lesbian with the rest a variety of hardcore. The models seem to be mostly Filipinas though much of Asia seems to be represented including Koreans, Chinese, Japanese, Malaysians, Indonesians, Thais, and Vietnamese – many if not most are cute amateurs as opposed to hardcore pros. Unfortunately, download quality and overall camera work is too often an issue. However, there’s something here for most everyone, even several BBW scenes. The site is well-organized as noted above.
Bottom line – while there is much to throw away here, I found the videos worth sifting through for the diamonds in the rough that you can’t find most anywhere else.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
• Over 400 videos / photo sets available
• No censorship / pixilation
• 2-day trial membership available; all membership options include access to the entire network
• Variety of payment options including Epoch. Segpay and JAVBill for credit card processing
• Streaming and downloads available. Fast download speeds.
• Good streaming quality – HD
• Most downloads available in HD with two other lesser formats available
• Photos have good resolution with 2 different download options (zip)
• Good search features – in advanced search, you can type in keywords
• There is a favorites feature so you can return to any video easily
Cons:
• Last update was in July 2016.
• Not all content exclusive.
• While this is certainly a plus for others, there are too many extended BJ scenes for my taste.
• Some of the scenes are downright ridiculous and require a sense of humor. This is both a plus and minus, mostly a minus for humorless me ;).
Bottom Line:
[In my opinion, the Japan HDV network is amazing in most every respect. Not only are all 7 sites winners as far as content, but they also contain most of the small and not so small qualities that are just as important to the overall experience, i.e., video/photo quality (though that varies somewhat), searching features, organization, support, etc.
I’m prefacing all my reviews of the 7 sites with the following caveat. For all intents and purposes, 3 of the sites are virtually identical in type of content – Japan HDV, AV Idolz and JAV HQ. The entire network is similar in format and structure. After some consideration, I decided to do separate reviews instead of one overall review since 4 of the sites are vastly different in content. However, because of the similarities, some of the reviews are repetitive. It’s a great network and IMO, the best JAV network, plus you get a bonus of a very hot Thai site.]
Almost identical to the parent site, Japan HDV. Like its parent, there’s a variety of videos and photos including bukkake, group sex, BJ’s, hardcore… you name it. The site is extremely well-organized as noted above. Some may find the Japanese taste a little strange and over the top with too much focus on toys, bukkake, outdoor and zany scenes. However, there’s enough assortment to please most anyone with an affinity towards Japanese women. The women are mostly good looking model types. While I am not familiar with who’s who in the porn industry, many of the faces are familiar and at least some of the content is not exclusive. The “Idolz” purportedly indicates that these babes are stars in their homeland. I didn’t find much to criticize.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
• Mostly exclusive Filipina and Thai collection.
• Variety of scenes including solo, lesbian, hardcore with some anal.
• CCbill is the processor; no issues signing up or canceling.
• Secure site (https).
• Approximately 500+ videos available dating back to 2010
• Currently updating at a rate of about 2 or 3 videos weekly if one is to believe the dating. [As of this writing, there have been no updates for 2 weeks.]
Cons:
• One of my biggest complaints is that many, if not most videos, you have little idea about the type of scene you are getting until you download it. There is no description of the videos and the title is generally meaningless. The thumbnail is generally of no help either.
• For whatever reason, streaming did not work with Google but generally OK with Safari. Streaming did now work with older videos.
• High quality photos but I did not see any way to download sets, only individual photos.
• Only 1 download option, 1280x720 for the latest videos and it goes downhill with older videos. For the most part, I found the quality adequate, albeit, not stellar. The oldest ones are low quality wmv files.
• Probably a personal thing, but I detest the predominant male actor – he’s obnoxious and is a stereotype of the ugly American, though he might be European. He has a large presence in many Filipina and Thai sites.
Bottom Line:
The site has a vanilla layout. There are various categories including “videos.” I went straight to videos and downloaded all of them. There are no bells and whistles, like a search feature, meaningful descriptions, meaningful file names (for the most part) or any other info except a date. I have a hunch that very few, if any of the scenes, at least the recent ones, are dated honestly due to the lack of video quality. However, downloading was straightforward and fast.
That being said, as a whole, I liked the site as it fits one of my favorite niches… amateur and innocent hot, mostly young Filipinas and Thais. Despite the poorer video quality, I liked the older scenes significantly better than the more recent ones. The recent scenes don’t have the same amateurish charm and innocence as the older ones. You’ll find more tattoos, piercings and makeup in the more recent scenes, not my thing. As mentioned in the cons, another reason I liked the older scenes better is that frankly, I can’t stand the male actor that predominates in the recent scenes.
Recommended for those who like hot Filipina amateurs. Otherwise, the less than stellar video quality and lack of diversity will make the site unappealing to a wide audience.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
• Daily updates
• Over 1200 videos / photo sets are limited
• No censorship / pixilation
• 2-day trial membership available; all membership options include access to the entire network
• Variety of payment options including Epoch, Segpay and JAVBill for credit card processing, all trusted though my first choice would be Epoch
• Streaming and downloads available. Fast download speeds.
• Good search features – in advanced search, you can type in keywords
• There is a favorites feature so you can return to any video easily
Cons:
• Video quality varies from good to average
• Streaming quality only fair
• The HQ in the name of the site is misleading. It is not HD. HQ = 624x416 or fair.
• Not all content exclusive
• While this is certainly a plus for others, there are too many extended BJ scenes for my taste.
• Some of the scenes are downright ridiculous and require a sense of humor. This is both a plus and minus, mostly a minus for humorless me ;).
Bottom Line:
[In my opinion, the Japan HDV network is amazing in most every respect. Not only are all 7 sites winners as far as content, but they also contain most of the small and not so small qualities that are just as important to the overall experience, i.e., video/photo quality (though that varies somewhat), searching features, organization, support, etc.
I’m prefacing all my reviews of the 7 sites with the following caveat. For all intents and purposes, 3 of the sites are virtually identical in type of content – Japan HDV, AV Idolz and JAV HQ. The entire network is similar in format and structure. After some consideration, I decided to do separate reviews instead of one overall review since 4 of the sites are vastly different in content. However, because of the similarities, some of the reviews are repetitive. It’s a great network and IMO, the best JAV network, plus you get a bonus of a very hot Thai site.]
Almost identical to the parent site, Japan HDV. Like its parent, there’s a variety of videos and photos including bukkake, group sex, BJ’s, hardcore… you name it. The site is extremely well-organized as noted above. Some may find the Japanese taste a little strange and over the top with too much focus on toys, bukkake, outdoor and zany scenes. However, there’s enough assortment to please most anyone with an affinity towards Japanese women. The women are mostly good looking model types. While I am not familiar with who’s who in the porn industry, many of the faces are familiar and at least some of the content is not exclusive. The site is inferior in download and streaming quality to its 2 sister sites, Japan HD and AV Idolz. There is no HD option.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Includes 8 sites: 88square, All Asians, Asian Sex Club, Filipino Fuck, Keira Lee, Naked & Live, Tera (?) Lee, Tia Ling
* Good support (judging by one interaction)
* Some (not all) hot wimmin
* Didn't notice too many boring scenes that you usually see in the Japanese films, such as excessive playing with toys, though that's certainly included
* no daily download limit and downloads seemed fast
Cons:
* Only 3 sites had hard core (maybe a plus for you) - All Asians, Asian Sex Club and Filipino Fuck
* I got bored really fast; I was only interested in hard core and therefore the 3 sites mentioned above - much of many of these videos were with the girl alone playing with herself or with toys, then the guy came in to have sex which practically put me to sleep
* I forget the stats, but the video quality was only fair, not good or great. I use a 27" Mac monitor.
* Didn't notice any anal scenes or threesomes, both generally absent in japanese and filipino hardcore
Bottom Line:
I was hoping for a lot better and was hoping to really like this site. Asian sex in general is one of my favorites along with Eastern European and Latin sites. There's a big difference among countries when it comes to Asian sex and I've come to favor Japanese sites which represent 2 of the 3hardcore sites here. I also like filipino sites. However, the sites shown here were just plain and bland, nothing exciting to get your dick all worked up about. If you're really into this niche, then you won't go wrong. I don't feel like I wasted my money, but it's highly unlikely I'll be back. I only glanced at the 5 other sites since soft core isn't my thing. There also seemed to be photo sets with each site, but again, not my thing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
• CCBill and Segpay are the credit card processors. (However, to use my preferred processor CCBill, I had to input incorrect credit card info twice before being redirected to CCBill.)
• Unlimited downloads
• Secure site, uses https
• Two DL and streaming options, HD (1080p) and SD (480p) – older videos in SD only
• PU discount $17.95 for 1 month recurring at $17.95 gets you access to the entire ChickPass network, a huge network
• Option to add to favorites (also, option to add comment but unable to determine how to access other comments)
• Robust navigability and search features
• Brief description of each video, though perhaps too brief
• Appears to be updating regularly, 2 or 3 videos weekly
• File names include name of model instead of a random naming scheme
Cons:
• Pre-checked cross-sell at signup
• Lacking in originality
• Videos rarely have an attempt at a plot
• The site is not truly Latina
• Streaming starts without a prompt
• Many models are on the slutty side
Bottom Line:
This is only a review of T&A Latina and not of the network, Chickpass Network. However, it should be noted that membership includes access to the network, a ridiculous number of sites, 80+.
Sites like T&A Latina are a dime a dozen. Despite its name and billing, it lacks focus and is seemingly an ad hoc collection of hardcore gonzo-like porn including many of the usual niches, i.e., solo, couples, group sex, lesbians and anal. Simply put, the site lacks soul and direction. The videos are boring, unenthusiastic, familiar, unromantic and ordinary. The main thing the site has going for it is the sheer volume of videos and photos and at a good price taking into consideration that it’s part of a large network. The site has oodles of content not to mention access to a huge network of sites. If it’s bang for the buck you want, this is the place for you. If you want quality over quantity, keep moving.
The videos are formulaic, rehearsed and far from authentic. Too much fake this and fake that, i.e., groaning “Oh yeah, oh yeah,” or “ooh” and “ah,” or “I want it really bad,” blah blah. It seems that every cliché in porndom is included. It’s pathetically laughable. Fake tans, silicone breasts, acrylic nails, crazy and decidedly unsexy acrobatic positions and fucking cocks that seem artificially erect dominate the site. This porn is like “fast food pornographic sex that continues until the female performer is instructed to fake an orgasm and receive a load of hot cum on her face” [tm, “Porn Studies, 2014”). There is nothing that distinguishes this site from the zillions of other sites or that makes it special. Hello San Fernando Valley.
Labeling the site “Latina” is deceptive. It is not Latina in spirit and bears little resemblance to anything south of the border or Spanish. It is pure San Fernando Valley, USA, either in spirit or actual shooting locale. One of the primary reasons I joined is because I have a penchant for hot Latina women. Who doesn’t? I can’t help but feel cheated. Although it’s hard to determine, I’ll go out on a limb and say that many of the models don’t have a drop of Latin blood in them. One model’s videos are in French (no subtitiles) and she is obviously French. Scores of others are unquestionably American, i.e., blond, blue eyes. Very few even have a trace of a Spanish accent. Those that are Latina, are unpleasantly San Fernando-ized.
It’s a vanilla site trying to appeal to everyone, a prescription for failure in today’s stratified market. Most every type of model seems to be represented. That includes, big tits, college girls, blondes, brunettes, chubby, mature, milf (what’s the difference between the last two?), petite, small tits and tattoos. Most types of scenes are represented - blowjobs, hand jobs, straight sex, lesbian, solo, anal, a few FFM and MMF, fake reality (like a gorgeous woman holding up a sign at a beach “I need money.” Guess what happens next?)
Videos range from under 10 minutes to upwards of 30 minutes, more recent ones in 1080p. There are approximately 430 videos dating back to 2002.
On a positive note, some of the videos are very hot, albeit containing the above-mentioned flaws. There are hot-looking girl next-door types, but few and far between.
Navigation is a breeze. Finding models or categories is simple with the robust advanced search features.
You can’t go too far wrong by joining T&A Latinas considering the wealth of content between this site and the network. There’s bound to be a bunch of videos that you’ll enjoy. If you’re looking to fill up a hard drive or two cheaply, T&A Latinas is an appropriate choice.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
**You will not find another site like this. This is not the same old same old, something I abhor.
**Customer service
**Epoch billing - cancellation takes 30 seconds
**Many beautiful (mostly) Asian women, all unknowns best I can tell and pleasantly and sometimes naively amateurish
**Search tools adequate for me, but I never nit-pick about that
Cons:
**Streaming only
**Streaming only
**Streaming quality hit and miss though I think it's HD 720 and 1080.
** Camera work is awful except for photos.
**Price = $39.95 recurring, too much for streaming.
**Lack of transparency about the streaming only - no mention of it before you join. I asked before I joined and decided to join anyway.
**Few anal and 3some scenes. Like most Asian 3some scenes, the women don't seem to be particularly into each other. For the most part, the only thing the women do together is give John a BJ.
**Since it’s just one guy, it’s formulaic
Bottom Line:
My beefs with the site are largely, a) poor camera work and, b) streaming only. Frankly, I care more about the camera work. For these reasons, I find it hard to recommend the site despite everything else it's got going for it. For you true lovers of the genre, I would subscribe for a month. I have no regrets on joining for a month and may come back in a year.
The site doesn't seem to be aimed at purely porn lovers, but instead, for those who monger or dream about mongering and who also have an interest in Asian amateur porn - a rare genre, except for Japanese, but they're in a separate class.
I would normally not join a streaming site and I did so with much hesitation. I joined for several reasons. The content is unique and, to my knowledge, can’t be found anywhere else. Customer service is great. I like and trust the people that run the site. Questions are answered rapidly and enthusiastically. They seem to have a youthful enthusiasm for what they do. These are the same guys that own Trike Patrol, one of my favorite sites, although it’s not tied into any package deal.
Why is the site is unique? The Asian amateur genre seems to be rare and is among my favorites. The theme, so to speak, is simply one monger (John), traveling and fucking his way through Asia and beyond. How often do you see models from China, Israel (limited though) and Laos in their home locale? Videos are listed by location: Cambodia, Canada, China, Europe, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Israel, Laos, Philippines, Thailand, Tokyo, Singapore, Uganda, USA, Vietnam.
John concentrates on finding Asians in the non-Asian countries. Some locales have very few videos while the more popular monger locales like Thailand have a whole bunch. They advertise 670 hardcore videos. Some of the countries have sub-menus which separates the country by city. I like this but I would have also like to seen a menu for videos by type, i.e., 3somes, anal, etc, but not a big deal since it's mostly b/g.
The appearance of the women ranges from OK to gorgeous with a few that should have chosen another career. They are virtually all amateurs, many who appear to be innocent and naive and new to porn. However, many, if not most of them work in the sex industry, i.e., bar girls, prostitutes. John often charms these women into going to his hotel room. Of course, the lure of money is certainly the major priority.
I have little interest, but the site is also an educational tool. That is, it’s kind of a monger guide. There are extensive writings by John of each video as well as advice about virtually everything you want to know about mongering in a particular area. There’s even a menu containing various guides for mongering. In addition, many of the videos include an extensive introduction to the locale or woman, up to half the video. There are also non-porn videos showing the city and bars, etc.
My hopes and expectations were so high for these videos. However, I was mostly disappointed. Camera work is the #1 issue for me.
According to Rich from the site, the site has a widespread and enthusiastic viewer base. I don't doubt it. There’s even a section “Mongers Questions and Input.” I believe that the site has a place and is popular for what it is, and that is more or less a tutorial on mongering mixed with hot videos and photos. They don't seem to place a high priority on pleasing the porn, uh, purist.
The camera work. The videos are apparently shot by one guy, John. I'm guessing it's next to impossible for one guy to do everything. There are times the videos are simply unwatchable, particular low-light scenes where it’s too dark to see anything. At times, the camera seems to bounce around making one dizzy, much like an amateur home video. The sex scenes are too often tedious. I’m guessing there is a camera on a tripod and POV giving very few angles. John also uses pixelation to cover his face but it often covers much more, including the woman. There's an argument that can be made that it's more realistic when shot by one guy and sacrifices are necessary to maintain the truly amateur feel. It's too much of a sacrifice to me and all I can say is to each his own. Good camera work and good video quality rank very high in my book.
So it's a tossup. Would you prefer the gloss and homogenity of the major networks or the unique though amateurism of Asian Sex Diary? I’d like something in between, but YMMV.
[This should probably be listed as a con, but because I don't know enough about the industry, I'll leave it as a footnote. John insists on not using a condom except in rare circumstances. I have to think this is highly dangerous and taking advantage of the women. Hopefully, Rich will clear this up.]
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-- gorgeous russian wimmin
-- well produced, for the most part
-- large choice in formats, to an extent
Cons:
-- no searching ability at all
-- very irritating: they used the same name for many of their videos. As a result, you have to change names unless you want them to write over each other
-- small content of HD hard core quality videos, about 50 videos; the quality of the rest are so bad rendering them worthless, to me at least
-- the site seems dated with no updates
-- after you get past downloading the first 50 hard core videos or so, the video length averages only about 10 minutes. The first 50 or so are about 15 to 20 minutes.
-- dull "bonus" sites
-- I had a problem downloading at first. I sent an email to them, the only way to contact. It took 3 days to get a response though I had figured out my problem beforehand. In any event, don't count on very responsive tech support.
Bottom Line:
I joined after trying the one day $1 "full" membership. I never saw that before so I figured, WTF. Well, the "full" didn't equate to the same access as regular memberships. You get access to all the videos on the main site but only at low quality. But the videos were enough to intrigue me to join. I like Russians -).
Advertised price was $34.95. I wasn't gonna pay it. However, when I cancelled my trial membership, I was offered $24.95, so, I joined. You have these choices - hard core videos, soft core videos, lesbians or photos. I was only interested in hard core and that's all I looked at.
The way I look at is that I got 50 or 60 very good videos, all 15 to 20 minutes in length. That translates to about 50 cents a video. Not bad, though not great. But if you like Russians, it may be worth your while.
Again, this review only applies to the hard core videos, not soft core, lesbians or photos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
• $14.95 first month recurring at $29.95 with Rabbit discount. There is no TBP discount.
• Streaming and unlimited downloads available (see cons).
• Updating at about 1 or 2 videos a week.
• Exclusive content
• Download options vary but are generally good. Some videos have a plethora of options from limited to 240p - 1080p (see comments).
• CentroBill is the credit card processor - no issues canceling recurring billing. Epoch is also advertised but I found no way to access them.
• Robust searching features (see comments).
• The site is easy to navigate and has a clean layout. However, see cons.
• There are approximately 70 different models ranging the spectrum in age and appearance, more in comments.
• There is a “Specials” option in the menu which seems to offer good discounts on several popular sites. For example, 21Sextury is offered at $7.95. I have not investigated the offers though.
• Videos are in Spanish with English subtitles though one was in English with Spanish subtititles
Cons:
• While here were 608 videos listed at the time of this writing, a ghastly number were not available for download or streaming. The problem is more rampant with the older videos but even some of the newest videos have this problem. I’ll take a guess at saying that 30% or more videos listed are not available.
• No photos, though not a personal concern.
• Lots of buffering in streaming, up to about a 5 second delay.
• Descriptions of videos are weak. That’s where streaming comes in handy in helping to decide whether to download. But as mentioned, there is the buffer to contend with.
• Model info is mostly limited to basics like height, age, measurements and the excruciatingly important astrological sign ;) I found it difficult to believe the statistics – ages and weight sometimes seemed significantly off. Sometimes there is a narrative description though it’s usually nonsensical.
• Tech support unresponsive, see below.
Bottom Line:
I became aware of the site after reading about a controversial scene filmed at a graveyard in Guadalajara starring the very hot Janeth Rubio (she has her own site). No, I am not into necrophilia, but I was intrigued. Sad to say, that scene is not on SexMex but it can be found on Ms. Rubio’s site. However, there is a scene on SexMex called “Conference” where Ms. Rubio is mock-interviewed about the graveyard scene followed by hot sex.
Mexican produced porn is atypical. Fernando Deira, SexMex producer, deserves credit for being a ground breaker in that regard. However, as noted below, he offers nothing novel to the porn experience unless you want to count the graveyard scene. Btw, that scene got him and Ms. Rubio in a lot of hot water.
Download options are strange. Seemingly, the same download option is occasionally listed more than once. However, there always seems to be a HD option (480p, 720p and/or 1080p) including the oldest videos. Yet, as to be expected, the quality of the older videos is not HD and not up to present standards. [My observations are based on using a 27” iMac monitor.]
Searching features are good. Using the “Tags” menu you can search through 47 categories. (But why does an ostensibly Latina site need a tag called “Latina?”) Or you can use the “Models” menu and find a model – they’re listed alphabetically. Or you can use the search bar to search for most anything, i.e., model, category, video title, etc.
Virtually every type of category and niche is represented from solo and lesbian to anal, orgies and bondage and everything in between. Most of the scenes though, are vanilla hardcore or that “everything in between” referred to. There is something for everyone, but not everything is for everyone.
The technical issues on the site are very problematic, i.e., broken links and buffering in streaming. It’s too bad. It negates the general overall simple and clean look.
My opinion. There are distinct classifications of porn based on nationality such as Japanese, German, American, Thai, Latina, etc. However, SexMex fails to distinguish itself as Mexican or even Latina porn. The site is unfocused and offers a smorgasbord of women and niches. There is little ethnic appeal. If the scenes weren’t in Spanish, I would have no idea where they were shot. Frankly, if I hadn’t read about Sr. Deira and there was no audio or subtitles, it would be a leap of faith that the videos are emanating from Mexico. On the contrary, if you turned off the audio and there were no subtitles, you may think you were watching American porn. Perhaps Sr. Deira meant the site to be an extension of American porn. The name “SexMex” is a clue – think, Tex-Mex. Then again, you may not care.
I only found a few models to my liking, though ymmv. Many if not most are hardcore in appearance and sport lots of tattoos and silicone, not my preference. There are too many models who seem to have eaten a few too many tacos. Don’t expect spinners or girl next-door types. The scenes are far from romantic, have little if any plot and seem to take a cue from American-style porn. If you like the hardcore style and models of Evil Angel and Vivid, SexMex may very well appeal to you.
I’ll harp again on the broken links since I found this to be unbearably frustrating. While there are over 600 videos listed as available, perhaps 400 at best are accessible, probably much less. I emailed tech support but received no response.
Despite what I consider numerous drawbacks in the site - site-related and content-related, I liked many of the scenes, gonzo or not. I have no regrets about joining for $15. However, it’ll be a long time, if ever, that I join again. I fell in love with Janeth Rubio and may even join her site. SexMex would have been a whole lot better despite its drawbacks if it contained more women like Ms. Rubio and the site developers made the effort to take care of the technical problems as well as respond to customers. In the end, I cannot recommend this site if only because of the overwhelming number of broken links.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The only positives I have are superficial and unrelated to the content, but here goes:
• No problem with billing and canceling recurring subscription
• Relatively inexpensive at $20 for the first month, which is all you’ll need due to limited content
• Unlimited downloads
• Choice of watching in a number of different formats; downloads in 2 flavors, both MP4 – Mobile 320 plus MP4 3000k
• The management seems to be open to suggestions and are seemingly approachable, though I can’t say for sure since one question hasn’t been answered yet. I make this assertion since the site seems to encourage participation in several areas.
Cons:
Most of the following is subjective...
• They're new and the material is limited. I am only interested in hard core videos and I downloaded all of them in a few hours, about 40 with an average length of about 15 minutes.
• More than half the videos seemed to be soft core, i.e., solo girl and lesbian. I kind of had to figure out on my own what was what with the help of a brief (often unhelpful) description as well as a preview.
• There seems to be only 1 video upload a week. At that rate, it would be difficult justifying joining for a while for any reason.
• The content is second rate and the # of actresses is limited. I only found one or two semi-attractive. They’re not my type… the average age seems to be in the 30s, tattoos and silicon tits and just plain vulgarity seem to dominate.
• The site’s name is very misleading. There only appears to be one anal scene.
• They claim to offer access to another site, “Hot N Horny Amateurs.” There was nothing there when I checked.
Bottom Line:
I ran out of room in the con section, so first things first. To add to the list, there is a star rating system. It's a joke since every single video gets at least 4.5 or 5 stars out of 5. Ok, enough cons, you get the idea.
I know the cons seem overwhelming. However, I have hope for this site since they may be going through newbie pains and the people that run the site seem to care what their customers think. It's kind of like going to a new restaurant where they haven't gotten their act together but things mesh later on. I hope that will be the case here.
I really wanted to like this site and searched hard to find positive things to say. I went so far as to write the site’s owners for help in that department. Unfortunately, I received no answer, but it’s only been 24 hours and it’s the weekend. Besides, what could they say? The only positives I have are superficial and unrelated to the content.
There is a photo section and even an Erotic Stories section, but I was only interested in videos and did not check out these areas.
I really like checking out sites that contain other than American actors. I had only seen a few Australian videos and was looking forward to being immersed in a new culture. Oh well. Unfortunately, it doesn’t differentiate itself in any way as far as content except the actors have funny accents.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
• Authentic Indian / Paki porn.
• $12.47 monthly recurring (PU price), renews at $24.95
• Epoch is the credit card processor, no issue canceling
• Downloads and streaming (streaming available only in latest videos)
• Daily uploads, 6 on the day of the review (caveat – I don’t know how true this is considering the latest uploads suffer almost as badly in production value and video quality as the oldest ones, see below)
• There is a stunning model (Shanaya) who does solo scenes – some fully clothed and others simply posing naked. The downside is that there’s no sex including masturbation
Cons:
• Production / camerawork terrible
• Poor video quality, newer videos slightly better but generally 480 or less
• Lack of good looking models; many are overweight and/or geriatric
• Video length for many videos/clips is under 5 minutes, some under 1 minute
• No search function though sorting can be done by date added, model/set name and popularity
• While there are brief descriptions of the videos, most are too general or nonsensical
• Beware of a pre-checked sale cross-sell at sign-up page
• Occasional English voice-overs make the clips seem that much more surreal as well as comical
Bottom Line:
The site consists of mostly Paki and Indian soft and hardcore porn shot on location. There is even some R-rated stuff. The scenes range from solo (which varies from clothed to masturbation), to blowjobs, to some lesbian and hardcore as well. Solo and blowjobs dominate. There are also many webcams that were transferred to video.
For various reasons, there is a dearth of Indian porn available, a topic beyond the scope of this review. Since there is so little of this genre available, I won’t completely dismiss DesiPapa despite its incredible lack of production values and shortage of good looking women. Even though many, if not most of the videos/clips are under 5 minutes (including a number that are under 1 minute), there is a wealth of material available. Some of it is passable and may make the site worthwhile if you don’t mind spending time weeding out the junk. If I had to quantify – and this is purely subjective – I would say that 5% of the videos pass the litmus test.
There are 4 sections for content as follows:
• Movies - over 6000 clips/videos – from 45 seconds to 25-minute seemingly homemade amateur videos
• Masala videos – 200 clips /videos – I could not differentiate this section from the above
• Bonus Content – 350 clips/movies - If there ever was a misnomer, the “bonus” section is it. It’s a real hodgepodge but mostly indistinguishable from the above sections except for having some international content
• Pictures – 150 sets of about 50+ photos each of a generally hot Indian model posing with clothes and/or nude. However, I could not find a way to download, a huge minus. Like the videos, quality is horrible – very grainy. No updates since 2010
It should also be pointed out there is an option for sex chat but I didn’t investigate.
I am not an expert in this matter, but if I had to guess, I’d say the clear majority of the scenes were shot using one cheap camera or old smartphone on a tripod or propped in a stationary position affording only one angle. For example, there are at least several scenes showing the guy on top in missionary with only his hairy behind and back in view for the entire clip. Most videos/clips are dimly lit which is sometimes a blessing in disguise.
Many of the scenes are downright weird, not in a good way. The descriptions also leave a lot to be desired, though at least there is a description. For example, one called “Pakistani Couple from Lahore,” - the description reads “we are a young Pakistani couple that enjoy make sex (sic) together.” This 14-minute video features the couple lying in a bed for 12 minutes fully clothed and sharing a cigar. The last 2 minutes he sucks her breasts. Not exactly titillating. There are several short clips which show a woman pleasuring herself that only shows a hairy pussy and finger. These are two examples of what is to be expected.
I’ll make another supposition that many of the clips were homemade. This would help explain the lack of quality in most every respect. It should be noted that one scene had an imprint, “xhamster.com.”
The site will undoubtedly appeal to some porn fans, particularly those hungry for anything Indian. If you really want to see Indian porn, the choices are very much limited. DesiPapa is probably as good/bad a choice as the few other such sites. Personally, I’m not overly disappointed considering the scarcity of the genre. It was worth $12 to see a handful of decent scenes. However, some may find that the work involved in finding appealing scenes not worth the effort. I won’t be back. Once is enough for me, adios or Namaste DesiPapa.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
