Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Licker (0)  

Feedback:   All (4)  |   Reviews (2)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (2)

Other:   Replies Received (1)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-4 of 4  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Exploited Teens

Exploited Teens
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment

Are the updates from the last 3 years new girls or do they look like videos that have been in the can for a while and are only being released now?

02-09-17  06:24pm

Review
2
Visit Club Strawberry

Club Strawberry
(0)

50.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: None
Cons: Old, very, very old material as in stuff from 2000
Low, low resolution. Like 640x480.
Very tiny amount of content: maybe 20 sets in total.
Content is regurgitated content from other sites as well.
Advertised content is not found in the website.
Bottom Line: Don't bother. The material hasn't been updated since Saddam Hussein was still in power. It's a dead site with the same 20 sets rotated over and over. Not even worth the $2.95 trial.

06-17-14  11:19am

Replies (0)
Reply
3
Visit Exploited Teens

Exploited Teens
(0)
Reply of uscue's Reply

No, they don't update at all. They've even removed a lot of scenes: older and newer ones. I'm on my 2nd month and just cancelled since nothing has been added since I resubscribed. It's a dead site now.

06-17-14  11:12am

Review
4
Visit Studio Dolls

Studio Dolls
(0)

50.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good looking girls
Cons: Paltry content
Dead site as it no longer updates
Too expensive for the amount of content
Bottom Line: Don't bother. This site looked like it would be combo of the Brianna's Beauties and SWamateurvideo sites since that's where this content is pulled from. It would have been if they bothered to reupload the material but it looks like they decided to stop right at the beginning. The updates weekly bit is a total lie. This site hasn't been updated in a year and all the material is from a few months. You're essentially paying for a little more than a trial. Take, for example, the videos. Videos from the 2 aforementioned sites were usually 60 minutes (6 videos of 10 minutes each). You get the first part of a video and that's it. You may get a picture set or 2 of each girl as well even though there are more of these as well. There's a reason there is no information of what's inside since there isn't much. Definitely not worth the $20/month they want for it. It would have been worth it if they bothered just to upload the old content of these girls. Some of them are really cute like Lauren and Summer. It's softcore material and the hottest girls are generally non-nude for those that are still interested. There are much better sites of this genre out there so if I didn't make it abundantly clear yet, take a pass on this site.

02-26-14  08:29pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-4 of 4  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.05 seconds.