| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
I joined up earlier this year. It's a smaller site and I only joined for a month, downloaded a bunch of stuff and have slowly been checking it out when I have time. Actually some great quality content and women on the site, I was thinking about re-joining.
They may only have older samples on the public-facing site, but they have been solidly posting releases, you can check out the line up (covers only) at: https://www.thenude.eu/covers/photodromm/2019/09/. I don't think the newer releases are re-hashes of older material, from what I can tell.
As with any site that's been around a while the older stuff is lower quality, but the recent photo and video work is good. They tend to post an update every few days. The video updates are usually in 3-4 parts, e.g. one video is "Part 1", then the next "Part 2" video update carries on from where the first left off etc. But each part is ~10 minutes so not bad. Photo sets are approx 50 images per set, which personally I quite like - the 140+ sets I find just too much.
|
09-18-19 02:10am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Completely agree with skippy - sites need to do more to encourage ongoing membership and make it worthwhile. Right now I usually sign up for a month or two, then quit, then return for a membership six months or so later and catch up on the new content. Really, people doing what I do can't be in their best interest but I imagine is the norm, and you'd think they'd do a better job at promoting continued support.
|
05-19-17 08:29pm
|
Reply
3
|
Sinful XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Excellent! Glad to be of service - after all, that's what this site is about. Like I said in the review, it's fairly small - but a membership won't break the bank. Hope it tickles your fancy :)
|
04-05-17 03:31am
|
Review
4
|
Sinful XXX
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
High quality photos and video. Hot scenes of sexy couples - the women are beautiful (and the guys are too, for the ladies out there)
There’s a range of payment options, and billing is via Epoch or vsxbill; cancelling was easy.
Download speeds are as good as any other site I’ve used. |
| Cons: |
Some of the videos are cross-posted content from other sites, like tasters with links to get you interested – at least one I recall was from SexArt and others from larger sites. These are definitely the minority though, most is original. Some, but not all, of the cross-posted videos are streaming only, but others are downloadable and 1080p just like the original content.
One funny thing is the studio doesn’t seem to be fully soundproofed and must be in the middle of town – every now and then you can hear a truck or something in the background. But it’s in the back and not too much of a distraction.
There’s a “Live Cams” link, which actually just goes to www.secretfriends.com - not so much of a 'con' for me, as I'm not really into cams and typically sign up to sites for the photos or videos; if I want cams, I'll just up direct to a cams site - but every site these days seems to have a cams section/link. |
| Bottom Line: |
I find the idea of “female friendly” or “couples porn” a slightly strange concept. If anything the women I know who like porn are just as keen as any guy on seeing some hard core action, explicit sex and maybe a bit of extra fantasy like threesomes or group sex that wouldn’t be part of their everyday sex life. Looking around at all the content out there these days I’ve realized if anything, my tastes are actually fairly vanilla. I like seeing beautiful females undressing, naked, playing with themselves and having hot sex. And I even get a bit of vicarious pleasure from seeing a guy really enjoying something like a Hegre-art style boner massage. An as it happens, hot women naked and couples enjoying each others bodies is exactly what you get on most “female friendly” porn. Hence why I find the name weird: because “female friendly” porn ticks all the right boxes for this heterosexual male.
“Couples” porn is really just about finding something that tickles both your fancies – and luckily my partner and I have similar tastes and have watched a lot of SexArt, X-Art and other offerings such as Daring Media.
So when I stumbled across SinfulXXX I knew I’d found something right on the money for our tastes. I’m not even sure how I found it. It’s a small site and doesn’t seem to have been around that long. In a one month membership I probably downloaded the whole site. So it’s not huge but I thought I should throw out a review – when I was looking to sign up, there didn’t seem to be any info out there I could find about it
They update once a week – usually with a video and photos from the same shoot. The photos are well done, only one size, but at 4000 x 2667 they have all the resolution you need without taking up too much disk space. The videos are usually around the 20+ minute mark and are shot well, and in 1080p.
Where the site excels is in its “black background with sweaty/oiled bodies” original content. You can see gifs of what I’m talking about on the site’s home page. As is often typical, the videos start with a few minutes of background music/foreplay content, and this build up probably does go on longer than other sites, but then the music drops out and it’s just the sounds of the sex. They’re usually a bit of a slow burn – some long handwork and oral scenes before getting into the penetration. The focus is on slow, prolonged pleasure, and it looks and sounds like the actors are genuinely enjoying it, which is a big turn on for me. There’s some interesting angles in places – e.g. a woman standing with her legs in an A-frame, shot from behind with pussy on full view, but head bent down and slowly but surely working her lips up and down the member of a guy lying on the ground.
Some of the shots, especially during oral scene, are real close up, such as graphic slow segments of women wrapping their mouths around the guy’s members in an almost macro-video style, which is surprisingly hot! (there’s also some examples of this on the gifs playing on the home page as I write this review). Facials are out, but I think every scene I’ve watched ends with the guy pulling out and shooting his load over the woman’s torso or back, or even standing up and coming over her while she’s kneeling or lying on the ground. So there’s no shortage of explicit sex, female orgasms and happy endings for both parties.
The models, including guys, are often familiar faces, e.g. from SexArt or the similar European scene. While the black background with dripping bodies theme is probably my favorite, they do vary the setting – e.g. a “Saints and Sinners” series with content starting a church (starting at least, not the full act right there in the church unfortunately!), or over a dinner table, etc.
It’s a fairly small site: I’ve got 30 videos and 20 folders of photos - approx. 50 GB in total – downloaded after a one month membership, and there were a few more available. For the month I was a member the weekly updates appeared without fail, and really 30 videos of 20+ minutes each is plenty of content for this price – currently 20 euros/month. I do hope they continue and don’t just get bought out by a bigger outfit as I think they’re doing some great, simple content shot really well. |
|
02-11-17 06:06pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
5
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yeah I agree, it's obviously hard for these one-photographer sites, not to mention one-model sites. I do hope some of them keep going though to keep up a bit of diversity in the field. Having said that, I agree met-art would be a good fit for the content he has amassed. Thanks for the reply
|
06-18-16 11:10pm
|
Comment
6
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
|
06-17-16 08:50pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
7
|
Young Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Yes completely agree! You summed it up perfectly.
|
05-28-16 01:29am
|
Reply
8
|
Young Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I just came to the end - no pun intended ;) - of a membership here. I felt the newer material wasn't as strong, more threesomes and seemed to have models more practiced at porn rather than the amateurish approach in the earlier content. But the majority of it was great, plenty of foursomes of two couples going at it together. Sure the format was perhaps a bit formulaic, but damn it was hot and it was great to see these hot young Russians just getting right into it, some seriously wild sex in places. I didn't check out the rest of the network that much but the membership definitely gave you access to a lot of material. I hope they keep going, there doesn't seem to be much else around that's quite the same, maybe with more couples, e.g. the three couple combo's in a few scenes.
|
05-27-16 11:44pm
|
Review
9
|
Glamour.cz
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Seriously hot models. There's a couple of well-known faces - Marketa Belonoha, Iveta Vodáková, Caprice and Monika Vesela for example. But most of the models are nowhere else. When the makers of this site hit the mark, they hit it well and there's some very sexy, stylish photography to be had. |
| Cons: |
The site is a bit of a chameleon - as stated in the name it's glamour photography. Much of it is 'sexy' only e.g. swimsuit and the model leaves it on. So it's primarily a softcore 'nudish' site. This is really the paradox of the site: on the one hand, there's so much good, free porn and 'art nude' photography out there, you might wonder about paying for a site where much of the content is topless-only. But not all of it is - which means it can be a bit annoying if you'd like to see one model in particular undress completely, or if you're browsing there's no easy filter to just go for nude content. But this does force you to appreciate the non-nude for what it is, and some of it is still seriously hot. One con is that there's photos which appear in the banner of the site or even the update thumbnail, which aren't then available in the sets themselves. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's hard to know what to conclude about Glamour.cz. There's something endearing and erotic about their photography style, and I've been a member twice now. They've just updated their site design and are posting content regularly. If anything, as the site has gone on it seems to be getting more nude-friendly, with the completely non-nude content mainly older, and much topless-only or 'down to knickers only' content in both new and old content. Some models don't get nude at all, a lot do topless only, but some models reveal all and there's also some explicit pussy shots. So it's a real mix; just be aware that's what you're signing up to and you shouldn't be disappointed. It's almost all studio photography, with only a couple of outdoor sets. I signed up out of curiosity that models like Iveta were on here and was pleasantly surprised at the other models and unique content offer. I hope they continue. I do like their approach overall and have plenty of time for enjoying the sight of a beautiful woman photographed well, without needing to see her naked. But the lack of nudity at times can be frustrating and feel like a tease, and that's the dilemma of the site really. So if you're okay with being teased by some hot Czech women, who occasionally might take it all off for you, then fire away. |
|
05-27-16 11:26pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
10
|
Zemani
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I've come back to this site as a member a few times. It's similar to typical soft-core photography sites, e.g. Met-art, Femjoy, etc. but a smaller site. I guess I come back because the style seems more like Met-art style circa 2008-2010 or a Domai/Goddess Nudes approach, i.e. just hot young women naked, enough pussy on show to be explicit as well as full-body photos, plenty of outdoor action, no surgery and no obvious photoshopping - so just good pictures of naturally beautiful women. Judging by the ages given on the site they're all between 18-23. I'm always a bit suspect of the stated ages but I think that's probably pretty accurate. Some of the models you'll recognize from the usual European circuit (met-art network, etc.) but there's also plenty I haven't seen elsewhere. One thing I like is there's still a good proportion of models with pubic hair rather than shaved. Also a good mix of indoor/studio, outdoor and even some public shots with other people in the background. |
| Cons: |
I'm judging this on the photos only - they've got videos in their archive, which they stopped updating in 2013 by the looks. In all honesty I think soft-core videos are difficult to do well, so for me personally not such a loss to not have videos, but others might want to see some of these beauties in motion. The site seemed to have died out and didn't update from May-Nov 2013, but has been on a regular schedule since. Some of the updates are definitely older sets which are just being posted now (judging by seeing the same models now looking older elsewhere) but they're still good quality and don't seem to be repeat posts (i.e. just older sets from the site being posted as 'updates') |
| Bottom Line: |
A good site worth checking out for anyone into the mainstream soft-core sites. Some very hot models getting naked indoors and outside. Good download speeds and simple enough navigation. Latest sets up to 5600px. As far as I can tell it's all exclusive content and not re-posts from other sites. As with most other sites these days, you can add favorites, comment and rate sets. |
|
05-27-16 10:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
11
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very unique content. The costumes and attention they've paid to developing their own erotic World of Warcraft/Game of Thrones style world is seriously impressive.
Video quality - outstanding. Up there with the quality of filming and sets you'd expect from a big budget operation. The 'acting' isn't necessarily great (reminds me of the old days of porn when actors actually had to deliver lines!), but it's endearing and kind of fun that they get into the concept.
Wide range of models, and body types (flat-chested, large breasted, there's all). Quite a different selection of models too - definitely not the familiar faces that appear on many Euro sites (Met-art network etc). Some seriously hot women here.
Photo quality is also not to be scoffed at. A lot of the newer sets are photos shot at the same time as the corresponding video, but there's also a lot of 'stand alone' sets.
Download speed as good as any other site I've used. No caps as far as I can tell. |
| Cons: |
The navigation isn't great. I was questioning whether to join up on the basis of the low quality website you can see on the tour. There's a few quirks like when you log in, if you hit 'home' you end up on the public-facing home page, and have to get back into the members section.
But, there's a note (not sure from when) that they're planning to update the site. I think it's a good idea that will really increase the profile of the site.
There's not many updates of late - i.e. one each in Jan, March and April 2016. I hope it isn't a sign of the site winding down. The flip side is that the updates are great - e.g. April is a 26 min 1080p threesome scene. But, there's a great archive so you'll get your money's worth there even if the updates are few at present. |
| Bottom Line: |
Genuinely surprised at how good the content on offer is here - and that they're not more well known! They're obviously pulling off some good work on a small budget. Really hope they keep it going. |
|
04-29-16 03:37pm
Replies (0)
|
|
