| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
For me, it's about the illusion of authenticity. Too many women just babble and overact, saying the same old tired lines they obviously don't have any attachment to. But when a woman makes it seem sincere, that, for me, makes all the difference. I want the dirty talk to be natural and inspired by the circumstances.
|
01-21-17 11:38am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
30 seconds is enough to show the models involved and the basics of the scene. :-)
(I'm pretty sure we're all familiar with the plot elements.)
|
01-10-17 05:21pm
|
Reply
3
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I suppose porn isn't so different from other aspects of our lives: when we get tired of the ordinary, we seek out different avenues for stimulation. Do you have a current favorite site?
|
01-08-17 06:28pm
|
Reply
4
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Hi mbaya - Thanks so much for the reply and the greeting! I don't subscribe to enough sites to offer lots of reviews, but I'll do my best to review those I have a good working knowledge of. I'm fairly open-minded, so I'll check out just about any site once. :-) And I'll leave just as quickly if it's not working for me. :-) Depending on my mood, I can be aroused by any number of genres. How about you? :-)
|
01-08-17 05:05pm
|
Reply
5
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Why, thank you. Thanks for the reply. :-)
|
01-08-17 04:07pm
|
Reply
6
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
I love your enthusiasm, Marc, but this sounds more like P.R. at times than a review. She should hire you. :-) Clearly you're smitten with Lelu. From looking over her site, she wouldn't seem to be everyone's cup of tea, but then, who is? It's nice that you're so satisfied with your membership and eager to spread the gospel. One question: you mention she won Best Female Fetish Performer. What specifically establishes her as a fetish model? Thanks!
|
01-08-17 02:58pm
|
Review
7
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
--extensive collection
--easy to navigate; helpful user interface
--attractive models (and lots of them)
--artistic approach to the shoots |
| Cons: |
--lacks diversity (both in terms of models and shoots)
--videos tend to be unambitious and predictable
--the sheer volume of material can be a bit overwhelming |
| Bottom Line: |
I can only subscribe to a few sites a year, and Met Art is always on the list. Unlike ALS, these are artistic shoots with an erotic bent -- nothing extreme here. But like ALS, many models are on the younger (legal) side, so if you're seeking out a new model, you can't go wrong here. Honestly, sometimes the youth concerns me -- some of the younger models look out of their element, as if they're not yet entirely comfortable with their sexuality. But most models look entirely comfortable, and the fact that so many of them have returned to do follow-up shoots speaks to their comfort level with the site and its producers.
The photo shoots have a quality about them that can transport you to an Eden-like place where beauty roams the countryside in all its natural splendor. (Outdoor shoots aren't uncommon.) And the models seem to be enjoying the experience. And OH, what beauties they attract: Lorena B (singled out by Standard in his review, and rightly so), Katie A, Lily C, Mia D, Nikia A, and Niemira (who apparently needs no last initial) are merely a few of the models who consistently grace this site with their beauty, and the shoots are always respectful and revealing.
When I do sign up for a one-month membership, I also like to search for models (like Nastya E) who are no longer posing for shoots but whose archives are available. All models are easy to locate, and each shoot is rated by members to help guide you (if interested). There are treasures to be mined on Met Art if you devote yourself.
On the downside, I'll echo what my fellow reviewers have offered: you don't find much diversity on the site. Most of the models have similar features, and depending on the model, shoots can become rather predictable (even though the site uses an impressive aray of photogs). The beauty and artistry, for me, is enough to overcome such a flaw, but it's there, which means that after you've spent some time on the site, you might find yourself needing a break.
Finally, the shoots are, as I mentioned, revealing but never too revealing. Parted labia may represent the most extreme content on Met Art. :-) Those expecting more may be disappointed; or they may come away from the site appreciating the female form as art. Whether that gets them off is another question entirely. |
|
01-08-17 01:14pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
8
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
Hi Pyrenees - Thanks for the reply. The first and most important recommendation would be to make the solo shoots more artistic and less driven by "extreme" content. The models on ALS are often attractive enough to be very enticing -- if they're given the opportunity to pose in erotic ways. And as a second (and related) recommendation, I'd like to see the models pleasure themselves genuinely (and not merely acting for the camera). Think of a site like I Feel Myself. Some of those women are quite beautiful; some are less so. But when they're caught up in the throes of passion, it's a highly erotic experience (if you enjoy that sort of thing). Let the ALS models -- or at least some -- bring themselves to orgasm, and capture that event on camera and film. Third, stop trying to turn every model into a barely legal teen. Let them be themselves -- shaved or trimmed, pigtails or not.
Now, I recognize that for a lot of guys who are into ALS, they like what they're getting now. So maybe I'm proposing another area of ALS for those who crave more natural, erotic, artistic fare with attractive models. As is, I don't see a whole lot of diversity in the approach ALS takes to shoots. (Strange objects, fists, stretching, etc.) That's not a gripe -- they obviously have a loyal following for what they do -- but you asked about upping the subscriber rolls, and I think the approach I'm suggesting may have some effect. It will attract a more classy clientele, anyway. ;-) And it may make the site more appealing for models who aren't into "extreme" content.
|
01-08-17 12:29pm
|
Reply
9
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Thanks for sharing, elephant. They do have attractive women on the site, so it would be nice to see more naturally erotic stuff. Agreed.
|
01-08-17 04:15am
|
Reply
10
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Thorough review. Nicely done.
|
01-07-17 07:18pm
|
Reply
11
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
Very good review. Well-written, thorough.
|
01-07-17 03:03pm
|
Review
12
|
ALS Scan
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
--attractive models, usually
--high-quality photo techniques
--decent collection of models |
| Cons: |
--more clinical than erotic
--the site emphasizes youthful (legal) females, which means lots of pigtails and the like, which is silly at times |
| Bottom Line: |
I admit it: I've never understood why guys go gaga over this site. Yeah, I know the girls look younger and cuter, and they're willing to push the limits, but too often this site turns models into sideshow freaks, using odd contraptions and (occasionally) human assistants to show us just how far a vagina can be stretched. So hot. Not. Future gynecologists probably benefit from the site, but this isn't erotica, folks. In fact, in most photos, the models look anything but turned on: they're amused or speechless or bewildered. Similarly, I'm speechless and bewildered, too -- by the over-the-top reviews of ALS. |
|
01-07-17 12:14pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I have an old dog who needs early-morning walks (as in 5 a.m. or earlier). Once we've walked and I've gotten him squared away, though, I sometimes enjoy self-pleasuring courtesy of my BOB. It's so peaceful at that hour -- no distractions -- that I find the climaxes are often more intense.
|
01-07-17 12:02pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I like the spontaneity of it (even though I know it's arranged). If it captures some element of authenticity -- no matter how staged -- it can be appealing. Too often, though, it comes off as contrived.
|
01-07-17 11:59am
|
|
