| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content – over 1.7 million photos, over 2,700 videos, over 2,800 models
Big variety of content – solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, multi-girl
Some real gems in the archives
Picture and video quality is decent, but not quite as good as the best sites. |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Download speeds are a little sluggish, but not awful
Streaming of videos at higher resolutions really doesn’t work at all for me – lots of fits and starts
Despite the site’s name, few of the models were still in their teens when appearing on here. It’s not quite a MILF site but the average age is well above teenager.
Has a captcha when logging in – a simple one, so not a big negative in my mind.
Some strange glitches here and there, like no thumbnails being present for a few days.
Somewhat irregular update schedule – there were 13 updates in September. |
| Bottom Line: |
There is a lot of good content here, although it is not as easy to find as it could be. The thumbnails are a little on the small side when browsing the sets, so it’s kind of hard to tell how much you like a girl without going into the actual set.
For me, the archives held more interest than the current stuff, but YMMV. It looks like back in the day this would have been one of my favorite sites, but more recent stuff is just OK. Although they have picked up a few sets of some of the stars you see on other sites, like Nancy A, Gina Gerson, Mila Azul, and Sapphira, and as expected, those are all quite enjoyable.
Picture and video quality is decent, but there are other sites that are better.
I was able to spot a few of my favorite models from years back and enjoyed expanding my collection of those models. The archives date back to 2004, so there is a lot of stuff to look through.
The search function has slightly more than just the basics. You can search on type of action (solo, lesbian, hardcore, amateur or girlfriends), on name, on the first letter of the model’s name, hair color, and breast size.
The schedule for September had 6 videos on 9/6, 9/12, 9/13, 9/19, 9/25, 9/28. The schedule for September had 7 photos on 9/7, 9/11, 9/14, 9/18, 9/20, 9/21, 9/23.
About the gems I mentioned in the “pros” section. If you are a collector of Ariel Piper Fawn (she goes by Gabriella on this site) or Eufrat Mai, this site has some of the earliest sets I’ve ever seen of these two super stars. Like fresh out of high school. Demi A also has some early sets here.
Billing is PureWebPower.net. I haven’t used them before. Seems OK so far.
Bottom line, I am glad I signed up for this site, although I won’t be a long term member. The gems I found (mentioned above) make it worth it just on that basis alone, and there is plenty of other stuff here to keep you occupied for at least a month. |
|
10-02-17 06:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
27
|
Met Art X
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
that's definitely true. I think for some models this is the "next step" before trying a twosome. And some never move beyond the solo sets.
|
09-20-17 03:34pm
|
Review
28
|
Met Art X
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily Updates, either a photo set or video, with about a 3:2 ratio of videos to photos
Excellent technical quality
Wide variety of locales
Gorgeous girls, including many favorites from Met Art
Excellent navigation and web design
Good browsing, streaming, and downloading speeds
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2) |
| Cons: |
Occasional logon problems that have been plaguing the entire Met Art network recently – maybe once or twice a month
Has the feeling of girls putting on a show, rather than girls enjoying themselves |
| Bottom Line: |
Solo masturbation photo sets and videos are the raison d’etre for this site, and they do these very well. The technical implementation of the sets are everything you would expect from a Met Art network site.
The site only started up in March 2016, and there are currently over 330+ videos and 220+ photo sets on the site. They have adhered to a daily update schedule since their inception, and they show no sign of slowing down, so there is plenty of content here.
Maybe it’s just me, but I did not find this site to be among my favorites. There’s nothing to complain about from a technical or quality aspect. The girls are gorgeous. So why is my reaction kind of meh?
For one thing, from a story telling aspect, there’s a lot less that can be done with one person in the video instead of two, so there is a repetitiveness that is inevitable in this kind of site.
I think the other thing that disappointed me is that I hoped for more feeling of intimacy. As I said in the cons above, it has the feeling of girls putting on a show. And yeah, I know, duh, that is exactly what they are doing. But at their other network sites like Viv Thomas and Sex Art, they do achieve that suspension of disbelief where you feel like you are watching a genuine story of some kind.
The videos have a rote aspect to them in most cases. The first part is the girl teasing for the camera to get the guys aroused. Then it’s time to go masturbate. This one-two formula is quite common.
What I am hoping they can achieve is a feeling of getting closer to the models. For my favorite example, I’d offer up Michaela Isizzu in “Alone” over at Sex Art. I’ve watched that video 50 times and it never gets old. So they do have it in them.
Standard membership rates are $29.99 per month and $99.99 per year. The PU discount brings the monthly charge down to 19.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
One other thing – I recently joined one of the sites for a single month, and after completing the purchase, they gave me the chance to purchase a monthly membership to any other network site for a 50% discount – and also the lifetime memberships are available for $400 each (for any site) – so this would be a great way to get a lifetime membership to a site if you are so inclined. The catch is that this discount is available for only 1 hour though. So this can be a good way to get a lifetime membership for a bit of a discount to any network site, or else pick up a monthly or annual discount for some second site. But the time limit on the discount makes it very helpful for you to know ahead of time that it is being offered, so you can think about it a little before hitting the join button.
The Bottom Line is this is a very well executed site. For me, some of the artistry isn’t quite there yet. But if you are really into masturbation photos and videos, this site is definitely worth a look. |
|
09-14-17 07:54pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
29
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I struggled with the score to give, could have gone as low as 85. But the number one job of a nude photography site is to post great pictures of beautiful nude women - and this site does succeed at that.
I'd love for them to read this review, fix the problems, and earn high praise from me in response.
|
08-14-17 04:52pm
|
Review
30
|
Femjoy
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some of the most beautiful women you will find anywhere on planet Earth
Daily updates, with about 9 to 11 total updates each week. Almost every week, one of the updates is a video.
Extremely high quality production values.
Some of the models have A LOT of content – Ariel has 73 photo sets and 40 videos, Lorena G has 78 photo sets and 27 videos. Rena has been appearing very frequently recently – she now has 26 photo sets and 1 video.
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
12 years’ worth of content, and a lot of the older stuff is stellar |
| Cons: |
Still a number of technical quirks / glitches. They don’t interfere with the main task you are here for – looking at pictures/videos and downloading the same. But they make searching, tagging, favoriting, etc. a lot less useful than they should be.
Very little striptease action here – in most sets, the model is completely nude throughout.
Tech support is a joke. |
| Bottom Line: |
Back in the day, Femjoy and Met Art were very close competitors, and I tended to prefer Femjoy. Then at some point Met Art really stepped up their game while Femjoy seemed a little stagnant. The models on Femjoy were always quite attractive, but not spectacular. In the past year or two, this seems to have changed – there are a number of models on Femjoy that are stunningly beautiful, and I have not seen many of these models on other sites.
And when I say stunningly beautiful, I mean I am actually stunned. Several times a month there will be a photoset where I just stop and stare at the cover photo before clicking into the photo set. My jaw will quite literally drop on some of these. That doesn’t happen very often on most other sites.
The new design of the site (implemented in January 2017) is a huge improvement over the older Femjoy, but it still has many quirks and other issues. (If you prefer the older layout, that is still available at old.femjoy.com). The new version has been up long enough that these quirks should be fixed by now, so it seems likely that there will be slow or no progress on fixing the issues.
For example, if you go to the Models page, there are filter buttons across the top of the page for Sort By, Bra Size, Hair Color, Ethnicity, or Shaved. However, if you click on these buttons in Firefox or IE 11, nothing happens. If you do it in Chrome, The Sort By allows you to choose Recent, Views, or Rating, but the other buttons don’t do anything.
You can save Favorites for Photo Sets, Videos, or individual pictures, but not for Models. You can save as many Photo Sets as you want as Favorites, but your Favorites page will only display 20 of them – there’s no next page to see the other ones.
If you want to change your password, you have to do it through the billing site (ccBill in my case) rather than on the site itself.
Tech support is a joke. If you post a request for help via the FAQ/Support Page, you get no response. (I tried several times). If you try to “send feedback”, the page just hangs and never sends your feedback in. Luckily my requests were fairly minor, but it would be nice to actually have at least a response, even if it’s not possible to fix the issue. But when you make it impossible for complaints to ever reach you, you also make it impossible to improve the site. If they are assuming that the lack of complaints reaching their ears indicates all is well, then I guess ignorance really is bliss.
At least the speed is good for browsing, streaming and downloading. Picture and video quality is uniformly excellent.
Monthly memberships go for $29.95, with a PU discount to $149.5 for the first month. Annual memberships are $119.50.
There are 8151 photo galleries, 632 videos, and 577 models appearing on the site. The oldest content dates back to 2005.
If you like looking at outrageously gorgeous women who have no clothes on, this is the site for you. Based on the quality of the photos and the models, this should be ranked as one of the top sites in the world. Unfortunately the annoying technical stuff knocks several points off the score. |
|
08-13-17 07:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I have 4 at the moment and would love to add more. I like the freedom it gives me to not have to download like mad, piling up a huge number of zip files that I never open. I do have the concern that the site might go belly up shortly after joining - after all, it is called a "life of the site" membership. I assume they take the cash and plow it into cigars and booze rather than putting it in escrow. So there's definitely a risk there. Plus it gives me motivation to live forever.
|
08-10-17 04:44pm
|
Reply
32
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes, I would agree with that assessment. But I am already a lifetime member at Met Art, so was looking to expand the horizons. There is a lot of overlap with Met Art in terms of the models, but there are photo sets and videos for these models that do appear on only Errotica Archives. So if you're looking to add some sets for a favorite model, this can be a good place to look. But if I was to join only one or the other, then Met Art would be my choice too.
|
07-31-17 03:49pm
|
Review
33
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates, either photosets or videos (vids are one or two per week).
Excellent photo and video quality
Good download and browsing speeds
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Beautiful girls |
| Cons: |
Site layout is not quite as good as Met Art, but still better than a lot of sites on the interwebs.
Limited Model Information – measurements and home country
Very little striptease action here – in most sets, the model is completely nude throughout.
No sexual activity of any kind – the emphasis is on beauty. |
| Bottom Line: |
Errotica Archives is another site in the Met Art network. Originally it was a site for the single photographer Erro, who also posted frequently at Met Art, but it has evolved to be more of a multi-photographer site. Erro continues to contribute, but only a few times per month.
What I always considered one of the biggest strengths of this site was the long term relationship some of the models had with the site. For example, Iveta has 41 galleries posted from 2007 to 2013, with a handful after that. Nikky has 43 galleries posted from 2006 to 2013. Belle (aka Indiana A) has 37 sets from 2011 to 2015. Antea appears in 204 galleries (!) from 2006 to 2017.
Lately, it has started to feel a lot more like its sister site, Erotic Beauty. It seems like just one more place for various models to post a set or two that didn’t get posted at Met Art. There is still a lot of high quality content here, but Errotica Archives no longer feels as unique as it once did.
Almost all of the photo sets and videos involve solo girls, and the ones that have two or more are just nude girls near another – no sexual activity is going on.
The girls are very beautiful, rarely shy, and photographed with great technical skill. The site performs well.
The site boasts 319 Models. It’s hard to get a good count on the total number of photo galleries, but the main site goes back to 2005, and the archives contain some sets from 2004. There are over 600 videos.
The PU discount of $19.99 for a month is a good value. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
You should certainly find plenty of material here to occupy yourself for a full month if you take the plunge. And if any of your old favorites have an extensive representation here, you will think that you hit the jackpot. |
|
07-30-17 06:39pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
34
|
Girlsway
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good update schedule (recently increased to 5 updates per week)
Good back catalog of stuff too
Many of the shoots produce both videos and photo sets
Excellent picture and video quality
Good speeds for browsing, streaming and downloading
Pretty good model info pages, plus they have some behind-the-scenes videos with short interviews, so that’s another way to get to know the ladies.
Very attractive ladies |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Captchas required when logging in
I think some of the stories can get kind of weird |
| Bottom Line: |
Girlsway is basically a network that includes access to several lesbian sites: Mommy’s Girl, Web Young, Girls Try Anal, Sex Tape Lesbians, and Girlsway Originals.
In early July, they announced that they will now be posting 5 updates per week on the network, by adding a Girlsway Originals scene every Sunday.
Here are the updates for Mommy’s Girl for June 2017 – Videos on the 3, 10, 13, 17, and 24th. Photos on the 3rd (2 sets), 10th (2 sets), 13th (2 sets), 17th, and 24th.
Here are the updates for Web Young for June 2017 – Videos on the 4, 9, 18, and 23rd. Photos on the 4, 9th (2 sets), and 18th (2 sets).
Here are the updates for Girlsway Originals for June 2017 – Videos on the 1st, 2nd, 5th, 8th, 11th, 12th, 15th, 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, 26th, 29th, and 30th. Photos on the 1st (3 sets), 2nd, 5th (2 sets), 8th, 11th, 12th, 15th (2 sets), 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, 26th, 29th, and 30th.
Here is the update for Girls Try Anal – last update was 9/17/2015
Here is the update for Sex Tape Lesbians – last update was 6/22/2015
They’ve recently produced a number of squirting videos, which seems to be a trend in the industry right now, but it’s not something I personally enjoy.
Photo and video clarity is outstanding. Performance for browsing, streaming and downloading is quite good.
A percentage of the videos in the Girlsway Originals are consumer driven – “dream pairings” where the members vote on which two girls should shoot together, or maybe pick the type of scene they are in. This can be a fun way for members to interact with the promoters of the site. This often results in some fetish oriented stuff – you may like it, but it’s usually not for me.
One thing to try is to go to the sign up page, then go back, then go to sign up again, then back again. (Like you’re thinking about it but not sure). Eventually you’ll get a pop-up chat window where you’ll be offered a discount code. Or the standard PU discount is $14.95 which is pretty good. Standard non-discounted pricing would be $29.99 for monthly or $119.40 for annual.
Also, definitely check out the specials they offer on other sites once you have joined Girlsway. I was able to pick up a 1 month membership to Errotica Archives for only $5 – a great deal.
There is a lot to like at this site, and it is definitely worth at least a one month subscription to check it out. I ended up getting the annual subscription and I don't regret it. |
|
07-17-17 08:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
6 updates per week – 3 videos and 3 photo sets
Very high quality production values
1,017 Models, 23 Artists, 2.882 Photo Sets, 1,598 Films – there is A LOT of content
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
The Behind the Scenes videos give you a good chance to get to know the models better.
PU price of $19.99 is quite reasonable. Annual memberships are $100, and lifetime memberships are available if you already belong to some other Met Art site.
Speeds of browsing, downloading, etc. are quite good. Navigation mirrors that on Met Art, which is excellent. |
| Cons: |
For me, sometimes all the artistry gets in the way. I like simpler stories and less makeup. Although the makeup is rarely garish, it’s not the more natural look that I prefer.
Many of the photo sets are simply pictures taken from the video session, as opposed to separately conceived sessions. They are not screen caps however.
The Behind the Scenes videos tend to be quite short – less than 10 minutes
Except for the Behind the Scenes videos, there is very little model information |
| Bottom Line: |
Viv Thomas was originally founded by its namesake, but Mr. Thomas has since retired in 2014. He does make occasional cameo appearances in some recent videos, but is not the director for any new material that I have seen.
Unlike some sites where the primary content is the photographs while the videos are an add-on, here the focus is on the videos. The photo shoots are frequently (but not always) just photos of the video session. But they are still high quality photos in their own right.
The video collection includes almost everything that was posted to the site since 2009, with a small collection of earlier stuff, some dating back to 1999. So if you’re looking for stuff prior to 2009, it will be pretty hit or miss. Older videos are available in 360p. Starting around 2010 the stuff starts to become available in 720p. From 2012 on there is 1080p. Newer stuff is available in 4K, although I am not equipped to take advantage of that myself, so can’t comment on how good that is.
The site is mostly lesbian content, with some solo, and occasional boy-girl content up until about 2013. After 2013 it seems to be all female, which is fine by me.
Production values, in terms of clarity, lighting, sound quality, are all state of the art for the time they were filmed. The people behind the cameras here know what they are doing.
I tend to find the story lines to be not that interesting. The love making however, that does hold my attention.
The women are supremely sexy, with many of your favorites from Met Art or Sex Art also appearing here. For some, like Tracy Lindsay (who is amazing), this is her main site, with less frequent appearances elsewhere in the MA network.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
The bottom line is this is an excellent site, and if you are interested in girl-girl photos and videos, you definitely want to consider this site. |
|
07-03-17 09:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
36
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I definitely agree all pay sites should use HTTPS. I've been noting whether or not it is in use in my reviews. It was the firefox pop-up that caused me to be aware of it in the first place.
Especially since some people use the same user ID and password in multiple locations, it's important to have encrypted logons everywhere, not just on banking sites.
|
04-19-17 03:31pm
|
Reply
37
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
regarding: "-NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE.
THERE IS A POP-UP WARNING ON THE LOGIN PAGE (WHERE YOU ENTER YOUR LOGIN DETAILS TO ENTER THE SITE) THAT STATES:
THIS CONNECTION IS NOT SECURE. LOGINS ENTERED HERE COULD BE COMPROMISED."
This is because the site does not use HTTPS. Your browser (not the site) is popping that up to warn you. (Firefox started doing this a couple of months ago on their browser, when they detect you are being prompted for a login with only HTTP). This will be true for any site that does not use HTTPS. If you are using cookies to log in to sites you may find that more sites than just this one are leaving you vulnerable in this regard (not because cookies are inherently vulnerable, but because you aren't noticing the warning message when being automatically logged on).
|
04-18-17 04:34pm
|
Review
38
|
Sweetheart Video
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Video updates are usually every three days (except as of 4/17, the last update was 4/3)
Extensive collection of photos in addition to the videos
I really like the BTS features
Streaming works on all the videos
All video downloads are available in various formats, up to 1080p
Includes several bonus sites
Browsing, streaming and downloading speeds are pretty snappy
PU discount price of $14.95 per month is pretty reasonable |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
No model info
Streaming quality is not HD – more like 480p or 540P
Searching returns stuff from all the sites on the network – there is no good way to search and only get lesbian content, which is what this site that I signed up for (Sweetheart Video) focuses on.
Logging in requires entering a Captcha. This has now switched to a photographic Captcha, which I am finding to be pretty annoying, definitely worse than the text Captcha they used previously |
| Bottom Line: |
As part of the Mile High network, Sweetheart Video also includes access to these other sites: Bi Empire, Doghouse Digital, Cherry Pop, Lesbian Older Younger, Mile High Selection, Reality Junkies, and Sweet Sinner. (Girlfriends Films also appears to be owned by the same outfit, but it is not included in this network of sites and requires a separate subscription).
In this review I will focus only on the content on Sweetheart Video, not the other network sites.
It appears that Sweetheart Video started up in 2011, so they have a pretty extensive collection of stuff on line. There are about 1000 video scenes on line and almost 400 models on the site.
Every video I have looked at (excepting the BTS features) has a run time of between 25 and 35 minutes. There’s usually a couple of minutes of setup story before moving into the love making, so the story line is more ancillary here than on some other sites.
One of the neat things is the BTS (Behind the Scenes) features. They usually include a post-scene interview with the ladies. (Sometimes it’s a pre-scene video taken in the minivan while they’re driving to the shoot location). It’s quite enjoyable to hear them talk about what they liked about the scene and each other. The fact they are both usually buck naked is a plus. Two nude women in full afterglow can be extremely charming.
Searching will return values from all the sites in the network, which is good and bad. Good if you want to see anything a particular model might appear in, bad if you’d prefer to focus only on lesbian content.
Here’s an example of file download size for a video that runs 25:36. 1080p runs 1.26 GB, 720p runs 922 MB, 540p runs 369 MB.
One thing to try is to go to the sign up page, then go back, then go to sign up again, then back again. (Like you’re thinking about it but not sure). Eventually you’ll get a pop-up chat window where you’ll be offered a discount code. Or the standard PU discount is $14.95 which is pretty good. Standard non-discounted pricing would be $29.99 for monthly or $119.40 for annual.
Here’s what the update schedule was for March 2017. Videos were posted on the 1st, 4th, 7th, 10th, 13th, 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, 28th, 31st. (Also on 4/3 – but as of 4/17, no video updates since 4/3). Photos were posted on the 1st (2 sets), 4th (2 sets), 10th (4 sets), 13th (3 sets), 16th (3 sets), 19th (3 sets), 22nd (1 set), 25th (1 set), 28th (2 sets), 31st (2 sets).
Bottom Line – This is a good Lesbian site, although if the lack of updates in past 2 weeks is an indication, this might become a non-updating site. Although you should be able to get a daily update if you consider all the sites in the network – it just won’t be lesbian content in most cases. |
|
04-18-17 04:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
Girlfriends Films
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
06-11-17 05:01pm (Update History)
Reason: Streaming is working now on older videos too
|
| Pros: |
So help me, I really enjoy the story lines
They take their time
They sure look like real lesbians to me.
New videos are posted once every 3 days. Given the length of the videos that’s not a bad schedule.
Over 600 actresses appearing in one or more videos
Some actresses have A LOT of content – Prinzess is in 88 videos, India Summer in 77, Elexis Monroe in 152 videos (!), to name a few (although some are just cameos)
I’ve been pretty pleased with the talent appearing in their most recent videos – hopefully this is a trend that continues
Download speeds are good and streaming speeds are fine too
PU discount price of $14.95 per month is pretty reasonable |
| Cons: |
Anything with a post date of 10/17/2013 or earlier will not stream for me, anything with a listed date after that will stream fine.
Streaming quality is not HD – more like 480p or 540P
Really big file sizes for downloads
I like talking and foreplay, but there’s too much of it here for my taste. Good thing fast forward works
Videos only – no pictures
No model info at all
Logging in requires a captcha
Navigation and site layout could use some work – not that easy to find what you are looking for, unless you can be pretty specific. No Favorites, although they do have Playlists, which sort of do the same thing.
The site requires Adobe Flash for any streaming. Given all of Flash’s vulnerabilities, I’d prefer to not have it installed on my system.
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about. |
| Bottom Line: |
Over 600 models
1294 Videos.
There’s a lot to like about this site, but I don’t love it. Update: They seem to have fixed the streaming issue for older videos, so I am bumping their score a little.
More than any other lesbian site I’ve visited, their target audience is other lesbians, as opposed to men who like watching women. The guys are certainly welcome, but the group they are most trying to appeal to is women. At least that’s the impression I got.
The videos all have some sort of story associated with them. Some of the series include “Cheer Squad Sleepover”, “Women Seeking Women”, “Mother Daughter Exchange Club”, etc. The stories are actually one of the stronger points of the site – they’re pretty good (for porn videos).
There are a lot of videos that have an older woman paired with a younger woman. Personally I prefer two younger women together. Given the total number of videos here there are plenty that have two younger women, but the percentage of older-younger combos is surprisingly high.
For example, you’d think “Cheer Squad Sleepover” would imply high school or college cheerleaders, and at least one of the ladies is a cheerleader. But the other is frequently a coach or a stepmom or somebody along those lines. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but it isn’t what I was expecting.
“Mother Daughter Exchange Club” is another example. Of course, nobody should be surprised that one half of each couple involves a mother, who is obviously at least old enough to have a daughter who is a grown woman. But once all the exchanging is done, and the younger set has been introduced to the joys of lesbian love, wouldn’t it make sense for the two daughters to get together? Amirite?
I saw another reviewer mention the large file sizes, and he’s certainly right about that. I downloaded an older video – 480p, 32 minutes long, 1.3 GB. That’s huge. For a 480P film the quality was good – certainly comparable to a standard-definition DVD. At least the speed of the download has been fine for me, so I’m not complaining about the length of time it took to complete the download given its size, just the massive file size itself. A more recent video (posted 2/19/17) was 1080p, 39:33 long, and took up 1.93 GB. Still I was able to download 5 videos at once, or about 7.5 GB, in about an hour, and was able to stream a video as well at the same time with no loss of video or audio quality – I’d call that very good.
In your travels, you may have heard that women like talking and foreplay. Well, the women on this site love talking and foreplay – it can sometimes take 10 minutes to get to the first kiss. All that talking and foreplay leads to many of their videos having a long playing time (so far the longest one I found was 1:02:16, and it’s not like I’ve looked at even half of the videos). 30 minutes would be a short video on this site. So if you like a long slow buildup this site should be great for you. Of course, eventually they do move on to very enthusiastic Sapphic love making, so you can always skip ahead to the hotter parts if you so desire.
In terms of navigation, here’s one of the oddities. Say you are on the main page and not logged in as a member. There is a tab at the top for Categories, which allows you to filter on 68 different criteria – knee socks or stepmom for example. After you log on, when you select the same Categories tab, there are only 36 categories to select from.
Another oddity has to do with streaming. As I mentioned in the Cons, I am not able to stream any video which was posted on or before 10/17/2013. But I can stream every trailer for every video (at least for those that have trailers) regardless of how old the video is.
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
One thing to try is to go to the sign up page, then go back, then go to sign up again, then back again. (Like you’re thinking about it but not sure). Eventually you’ll get a pop-up chat window (but you have to be on the sign-up page to get the chat) where you’ll be offered a discount code – this is especially valuable if you’re looking for a longer term subscription. Or the standard PU discount is $14.95 which is pretty good. Standard non-discounted pricing would be $29.99 for monthly or $96.40 for annual.
Bottom line –there is a lot to like here. In porn, content is king, and the content here is really good. My main complaints have to do with technical issues, which should be easily fixable, but unfortunately they don’t seem to be addressing those things. So this is just an almost-great site, not a great one. |
|
04-05-17 07:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The best celeb oriented site I have ever found
If an actress has appeared nude in a movie house movie or broadcast or cable TV, her nude scene is almost certainly going to be here
Weekly reportage of where to find nudity in newly released movies, TV shows, or DVDs
Occasionally offers lifetime memberships for $99.99 – a super deal
Once you’ve joined, they offer some pretty good discounts to some other sites – for example, they offer an annual subscription to Met Art or Sex Art for $72 – I’ve never seen it less than $99 any place else
Video downloads are now offered in h.264 format (MP4)
Newer clips available in 720p for download (older may still be lower quality) |
| Cons: |
Most videos are not HD, and the ones that are top out at 720p
Most clips include only the parts with nudity – so you lose some of the context and build up in the scene. Adding a couple of minutes to get the complete scene would be nice.
Many of the thousands of scenes they show are extremely short – as in a couple of seconds. For some of the super-short ones, they’ll offer a super-slo-mo instant replay. (But if it’s the only nip-slip of your favorite actress in existence, you’ll be glad for this feature).
Nearly all the photos are screen caps
No biographical information
No SSL is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about. |
| Bottom Line: |
Mr Skin has been around for a long time, and may have been one of the first porn sites I ever joined. It’s not the kind of site where you will spend hours there – but it is nice to check in a few times a week and get a glance at a favorite actress’ boobies. Or breaking news about an upcoming appearance of said boobies.
No doubt you have some scenes of nude actresses burned in your mind, especially from your youth – well you almost certainly will find those scenes here and you can watch them as many times as you want. (Jamie Lee Curtis in Trading Places – yum).
Their “About Us” statement is a pretty good summary of what they offer: “MrSkin.com is the world's foremost authority on celebrity nudity, and MrSkin.com is the web's #1 go-to destination for the complete skinny on Hollywood starlets at their hottest. Since 1999, MrSkin.com has grown exponentially, now attracting more than 10 million unique visitors every month who come to experience the site's vast library of sexy celebrity content, including more than 20,000 actress bios, 30,000 movie and TV show reviews and over 200,000 pictures and videos.”
Navigation is quite good – especially if you can recall the actress’ name (first or last) or the name of the movie. The browse function for celebs also offers a lot of choice (some sites might call this advanced search). For example, some of the filters include: “has shown bush” (the most important criterion IMHO), breast size, hair color, ethnicity, along with a count of how many fit that category. So for breast size, we get 4,792 small, 16,248 medium, 4,417 large, 253 X-large.
Downloads are fast – helped by the small file sizes due to short scene length. But browsing and streaming are also pretty snappy.
They have been offering lifetime memberships for $99.99 occasionally – most recently in December 2016. I have no idea what kind of pattern they have or when to expect them to do so again (if ever), but I would recommend signing up for their emails if you are interested in such an offer. Annual memberships are also offered at $48 per year (when on sale), so definitely look for deals for this site. When not on sale, prices are $15 monthly and $79 annual. The PU discounted price is $9.95 per month – not bad. |
|
03-30-17 06:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
41
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
thanks - really enjoy all the quality reviews on here, so hope to contribute a little to the community as well.
|
03-16-17 07:12pm
|
Review
42
|
DOMAI
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
5 updates every week – Monday through Friday
Lots of smiling in the photo sets – I like seeing happy girls
BOTD Archive – still accessible for free off the legacy site (legacy.domai.com) – updated daily, 15 beauties are rotated through
Lifetime memberships are offered
Navigation and site layout has been updated to match the style of MA (although the old legacy style is still available)
Site response is generally quite good – good download speed, good refresh from page to page, etc.
Picture quality is superb
More girl-next-door types here
Lots of nature sets, because nudity is natural, and nature is natural, so what better place to do your first nude photo shoots than in nature? These do seem to be the first photo shoots for a large number of these models.
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. The girls are beautiful and the settings are beautiful. |
| Cons: |
What? You can’t post updates on the weekend?
Pictures only – no videos
Price for monthly is up to $29.99 (it’s not hard to find discounts to $19.99), even though the legacy site still mentions $9.99 as the price – and the price is the same whether you join from the legacy site or the updated version.
Most girls have only a small number of photo sets (like one or two or three), so if you really like a girl you may not get to see that much of her
Model info is really minimal here, and in many cases non-existent.
DOMAI started up in 1997, but very little of the pre-2005 content is available
Very little striptease action, which goes along with the idea of “just the nudes ma’am”
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. This is a very tame site.
No SSL is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about. |
| Bottom Line: |
Some stats:
1095 Models
142 Contributing Photographers
2922 Galleries
Long one of my favorite sites, I’ve been a member off and on for at least 10 years. The focus here is quite simple – pictures of beautiful nude women. In fact the founder of the site referred to the philosophy being “simple nudes”, and that is still the governing idea here.
While full nudity is throughout the site (most of the sets the model is completely nude starting at picture 1, so not a lot of striptease here), Domai sticks to the tamer side of things. In fact, a few years back, they added a sister site called Goddess Nudes to allow them to show “more private parts.” There is a lot of overlap between Goddess Nudes and Domai, with some sets appearing on both sites and only a couple of pictures added or removed. Since both of the sites have been acquired by Met Art, the sites appear to be a little more distinct than in the past, but even Goddess Nudes isn’t remotely hard core, and Domai is no longer afraid of open leg shots.
This is how they describe the difference on the Goddess Nudes web page: “Or you could say that on Domai the sexuality is in the background, on Goddess Nudes it's in the foreground. “
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on all of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights. |
|
03-15-17 07:40pm
Replies (4)
|
|
