Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Something I can relate to and feel the experience -- the female orgasm.
Over 3,000 scenes of women having orgasms.
1,500 photo sets and 500+ models.
I signed up thru CCBill
The scenes are impersonal, which I think is a good thing in this niche. You won't feel like you know the model any better after the scene as you did before the scene.
Variety of sex toys used
Cons:
It says I have access to 3 bonus sites. Each time I try to sign into those bonus sites it says my login is invalid. There is a message scrolling across the screen that says the bonus sites had been down, but are back up. They're not for me.
The scenes are extremely short. I have seen some of as short as 1 minute.
Could use better camerawork with close-ups
Bottom Line:
I joined several of these real orgasm, feeling myself sites to do a comparison of them. The first point to make is I believe all of these women are having real orgasms.
I don't believe the site is getting the most out of the scenes. With varying degrees of orgasms, levels, they could have these models go for more than one small one, which is what a lot of the scenes are. I have watched maybe 30% of the scenes and would say more than 50% are minor orgasms.
Most women I know do not stop at the minor orgasm. That's when they are just really get turned on and very wet. Some of the scenes are longer (10 minutes plus) and those do seem to go for the deeper orgasms. It's very believable masturbation from start to finish and that's what the site is selling.
I think they could do more by having more of the scenes where the women use a vibrator or Magic Wand over their pants or panties. They do have some of those scenes and those are the best ones.
What I believe the main criticism is these women look like they showed up to masturbate. Everything is in place from the camera to the noise levels in the background and they are primed and ready to go. That is not realistic. When a woman gets the urge to masturbate she might go to a restroom in public or she might go to a friend's house and use their restroom. She might be taking a shower then the urge hits thanks to the shower massager. There's no feeling of spontaneity.
It's not a big complaint since they don't advertise themselves as having spontaneous masturbation. It just makes the scenes linger in that area of formulaic and clinical. The scenes that do break this pattern are the ones listed as "from the web". I will assume those are user submitted. Those are the shortest ones, but often are the most erotic, as they look like the woman had been masturbating well before the camera was turned on and just the orgasm is recorded.
I haven't watched enough porn to know if these women are regular porn stars or amateurs. I do recognize Jenny Mendez. Her scenes are some of the best on here. She starts out rubbing her clitoris and reaching the minor orgasm, then uses a Magic Wand or dildo to reach full orgasm.
The camerawork is a complaint I normally wouldn't make. I usually don't even notice the camerawork. There needs to be more zoom on the orgasms to show contractions and secretions. I do get the feeling the site is going for a more amateur feel to the scenes, but they are losing some of the best parts by keeping the camera at the same distance.
They could be an advertisement for the Magic Wand as that is the one the women are getting off with fastest. Which in my experience is also true.
They videos are good quality. I usually am more of a streamer than downloader. The download options on the newer scenes have full HD and HD and two smaller options, presumably for mobile devices.
The picture sets show more of what the videos should show. The women touching themselves in their clothes. It would take away the feeling that they are just there to see how fast they can orgasm.
I am not going to do a direct comparison to the other sites since I have not reviewed them yet, but I do like this site. I'm not a lesbian, but I can appreciate watching a pretty, young woman reach orgasm on camera. You will see a lot of thighs shaking, calves flexing and toes curling, continuing the belief these are real orgasms. Maybe there is some jealousy on the short ones? An orgasm in 3 minutes? How much more efficient my days would be if I could pull that off.
I would even like to see them add some sort of simulation for the woman. Maybe a screen of a porn playing that she's watching or just bring average guys in to sit and watch her. It needs a little something more added to it to be the very best of this niche. Not that I know if any of these types of sites actually do that. I have a feeling they don't.
It's more enjoyable to me than the mainstream sites where you can tell the director is telling the model to move a certain way to get her better side or better parts into the video. The moans are more realistic as well.
I haven't seen many that went to their limit and that's what I would like to see on a site like this. Yes, she had a minor orgasm at 3 minutes in and then a full orgasm at 9 minutes in, but let's see her go for one more and make a complete mess of herself and the sheets, bed or whatever she is sitting on.
I like the site a lot and could see myself coming back. Hopefully, they will get the bonus site access fixed. They update with 1 video everyday and a photo set every few days. Very happy with this site as a whole and hope they continue to improve it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A very good network with not too soft and not too hard hardcore sex.
The scenarios are much better than on similar networks.
I'm not bi or lesbian, but they have some of the prettiest women in their scenes.
Has 14 different sites included each with a specific niche.
I thought I was getting a great deal at $9.95 and will list it as a pro since I don't download much.
If money is no object they have a lot of addons they offer good prices on.
Cons:
There are no downloads included with the $9.95 price. I was interested in the content not so much for downloads, it's $14.95 more to add downloads.
It's such a nicely laid-out site, very user-friendly, but there are upgrades all along the top of the screen and each time you sign in they try to get you to upgrade.
Bottom Line:
This network could be one of the best in porn. The scenes are fun, creative, and the models are a step above the quality of models I am used to seeing on sites like these.
But I know the charging more for downloads isn't going to be very popular for most people.
The amount of attempted upgrades isn't going to help either. Look at this list of sites you can upgrade to: True Amateurs, Brazzers, Twistys, FakeHub, Property Sex, Trans Angels, Digital Playground, Pornhub Premium, Babes, Hentai Pro, WhyNotBi, Reality Kings, Erito and Metro. If that's not distracting enough they have a channels section that has 13 channels on it. I don't know if I have to pay to use those or not.
It says pay $9.95 to access the Porn Portal which is all those sites listed above. I don't believe they are going to give me all those sites for $9.95. Maybe it's $9.95 per site?
Most of the reason I scored it only 88 is the confusion.
The content is very good. I would score it 90-95 in content. The site Share My BF is one of the best ones I've seen. The use of clothing, leggings being ripped off, shorts being slid over, is something most porn skips.
Other sites like Don't Break Me, Girls Gone Pink and I Know That Girl have a great, almost amateur feel to them. They have a good Public site called Public Pickup, too.
The sites you receive without any upgrades have a total of nearly 4,000 scenes and photosets. They are updating 1 scene per day.
The streaming player works well. I prefer not to pay for downloads just to include the download information in a review.
It's a site I will mark down to return to and plan on paying for downloads next time. It's not really a con, but the cancellation system could be easier. I had to send them an email. To send the email, I had to go through 4 screens of offers and "are you sure" screens.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The best (non-fetish) hardcore site I have been a member of.
The amount of options they give you when viewing videos has to be most on any site and they all work.
Excellent organization -- is seen most in all the options, I could sit there and play with the different options for hours.
The scenes have minor stories and dialogue in them. It's not enough to distract you, but is enough to keep you interested.
The streaming player works better than any I have used.
The download options are the highest quality I have seen.
Cons:
They have so many options that they don't tell you are there. I did not know you can skim directly to whatever change there is in the scene. It's a con just because how many people even realize it's there?
The search features need more options. There are none that I have found.
Bottom Line:
This site is one other sites should aspire to be like. This is the part I was talking about as a con. If you open a scene and select chapters it lists every starting position of a change in the video. Pussy eating at 6:10, blowjob at 8:10, reverse cowgirl at 11:15, this one scene goes through 19 chapters in 52 minutes! If you are streaming, you just click which part you want to see and it takes you right to it.
The download options include - Full scene, trailer, behind the scenes and the full scene options are, 4k, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The file size difference between the two extreme is 4K (10+ GB), 480p (1.25 GB). The scenes are long and involved, even engaging for the viewer. They offer photo downloads and BTS photos for download too.
You receive access to Adult Fidelity, a site like Teen Fidelity except with models out of their teens. Between the sites there are nearly 1,000 models and over 2,400 scenes.
The Adult Fidelity scenes also feature the "chapters" section where you can find the parts you're most interested in watching.
There is an added enthusiasm on these sites that you don't often see on hardcore sites. They release 4 new scenes per week and all are worth checking out to stream or download.
They have a bonus section that has over 100,000 streaming scenes from DVDs from major producers.
There are added personal touches like Polaroid photos of models in candid (usually nude) poses that they have sent in thanking Kelly Madison and her husband Jeff. Most of them have dirty messages written on them.
I have just been streaming for the site. That chapters option changes the way I view porn. I hate trying to fast forward to the exact spot I want to see, missing by 5 seconds and having to do it over.
The download options are so big I probably won't download a lot. I don't have enough hard drive space to go all out on downloads, but do appreciate the smooth playback on their streaming player. I watched 3 scenes yesterday without one buffer. My internet is relatively fast (100M), but it buffers on nearly every site I stream from.
The site gets high marks from me for their creativity. Most of the sites I have joined that offer creativity either go overboard with it or don't understand what creativity is.
The camerawork is exceptional, making some of the scenes even more hardcore than they are just by the angle they are filming at.
I would have scored the site a little higher if not for the upsells for their 5K scenes. I don't even use the 4K scenes.
I normally wouldn't do this, but one series of scenes is good enough for me to download and plan on keeping. The Stranger Part 1 and The Stranger Part 2. Those scenes set a hardcore standard. The models in them are Lily Love and Ryan Madison (Kelly's husband). The energy is incredible.
I'm not for sure why there's not more search features. The chapters in the videos show an obsessive tagging system to let you skip to each part, but there are no tags to find scenes like the one you like.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of my favorite studios for DVDs
Large selection of their classic scenes
Around 6,000 scenes including celebrity sex tapes
The search works well.
There are photo sets, but they are small and rarely go with a particular video.
Cons:
I wasted two months of subscriptions trying to download Vivid Classic DVDs, first as an Adult Time member, now as a Vivid member. The DVDs are broken up on both sites. You have to find each part of the DVD.
While they do release a new scene each day it is only part of a DVD. If you are looking for the whole DVD you have to wait until the other parts are released.
Way too much emphasis on the celebrity content. The main page has two rows of celebrity sex tapes and most are 5 or more years old.
Last month I joined the Adult Time network to download Vivid DVDs. What I found was a mess Vivid scenes piled in together, out of order and with no way to group the like (DVD) scenes together. I had to search "DVD name, scene 1". The 7 related scenes would have 2 or 3 scenes from the same DVD, but many of those DVDs have 8 scenes in them. It became too frustrating to try and find them all.
My Adult Time subscription ran out so I thought I would try joining through Vivid. It works the same way on the Vivid site.
They do have the option to search by video, then put them in alphabetical order. This does line up a lot of the scenes in the right order and at least makes it doable. It was better than this the last time I joined (2016).
It was better downloading them from Videobox's Vivid channel than this is. Before, you could select a DVD and all the scenes would show up for download. Now, you have to click through pages of alphabetical listings to put the pieces together.
Why wouldn't Vivid come with Adult Time? It's one of the sites they really push on Adult Time. I am going to go through and get the ones I know Videobox doesn't have on their Vivid channel, then pay another $15 to add the Vivid Channel to my Videobox account just so I can easily find and download the scenes I want. After that, I do not plan to return to Vivid.
There are at least some good newer series that are easy to find in the sites category. The Nasty Stepfamily, Orgy Train and Mom is a MILF are all good series that are newer.
I am glad I figured out how to get the scenes to lineup in order or my score would have been much lower. I found 80 classic DVDs that Videobox doesn't have on their Vivid channel. Those make up for the one month subscription price.
If you are a Vivid fan I would recommend joining through their site and using the movies, alphabetical or date filter. On Adult Time, I couldn't get the DVD scenes to line up no matter what I tried. This is story-based porn. Having each of the scenes is very important.
I will give Vivid an 84, but Vivid on Adult Time is a 70 at best.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
It is rare, in my opinion, to see a site of unique, fetish content on a network -- House of Taboo is that.
Over 1,250 videos and 1,250 photo sets.
They are only averaging a couple updates per month, but there is a huge, excellent network included (DDF).
Should appeal to those that believe sites like Kink are too hardcore or too fetish-heavy. This is more like mainstream porn meets their kinky friend for a night of fun.
Rarely seen props and contraptions; in my opinion, these are probably made for DDF to be less strenuous or stressful on the models.
Very mainstream porn models are even in these scenes. With the content being exclusive I would think those are rarities.
Cons:
Some of the models look overwhelmed even in the lesser restrictive bondage and props.
Not a high percentage, but 10% of the scenes don't even use a fetish. Maybe their costumes are the fetish? It's not a big deal.
Bottom Line:
Kink's Network is my favorite bondage, BDSM network, but House of Taboo shows a lighter, more mainstream accessible side to bondage and BDSM.
I couldn't possibly cover all the niches and fetishes they cover. You do see a common theme of light bondage. It could be the model's hose tying her legs open or bounding her arms behind her back. They use minor ball and gag devices as well. They have scenes with what I believe in a homemade pillory, head/hands through holes to present the model as helpless.
In the cons, I mentioned some of the models looking overwhelmed. For some viewers of this type of content that is a good thing. When you watch bondage porn both the male and female are usually equally experienced and adept at using the bondage. You don't get that feeling here. You feel like the woman just had her arms bound behind her for the first time. I wasn't for sure if that is a con or pro. Experienced bondage sex can become repetitive. I listed it as a con because that could bother some viewers. It doesn't me. The House of Taboo scenes are entertaining and most of the time you see a very enthusiastic struggle from the female model. In my mind, they are torn between fighting the bondage and submitting to enjoy the sex.
One of the biggest differences between House of Taboo and a site like Sex and Submission is the amount of major star models on House of Taboo. The scenes are on the harder side of mainstream hardcore, including double penetrations, bound mouth with anal and even bound mouth and hands double penetration.
The newer scenes (last 12-18 months) could pass for Kink scenes, that is how hardcore they are becoming. I will share a tip to look at the older content if you are looking for the less hardcore. The older content has more girl/girl scenes and lighter fetishes like urinating/nurse watching and even a fucking machine similar to Kink's.
It is a steady progression and there is content from 2006 - current.
I have not had any problems using the site. It could be a little better with helping me (you, anyone) find similar scenes to the ones we like. They have tags and they work well, but I have seen some scenes that the tags are not right on.
If you are a downloading type, the photo sets can be downloaded and this genre is a good one for photos. I prefer their download options of videos. They have 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. The sites with too many options make it easy to click the wrong one. The streaming player is okay, it buffers a lot when I use it, but it could be my internet connection. The older videos do not have streaming option. They only offer downloads on those.
You also receive 16 other sites with the network. There have content in all of the mainstream categories.
House of Taboo is either my 1st or 2nd favorite site on the network. I will try to cover the fetishes I see the most often on it: urinating, light bondage, rough girl on girl, dual penetration, anal, costume (usually latex suits and masks) and props that could be as simple as a ball gag to a pillory. If I could fix one thing about it it would be more updates.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The genre-defining site for legs and foot fetishist in an equally as impressive network.
An incredible 2,789 scenes. The updates have slowed to 1-2 per month, but this site is 3-4 times bigger than the other foot fetish sites.
Different from Footsie Babes, Hot Legs and Feet has as many lesbian scenes as male/female scenes and Hot Legs and Feet has more hose, stocking and pants used in their scenes than Footsie Babes.
The oldest scenes are from 2001. I was not legal age in 2001.
Features the top models out of Europe. Photos are studio photo set quality, not screencaps.
Cons:
An advantage Footsie Babes has is they use the same men in different scenes, most of them are obvious foot fetishists. DDF's guys are good, but not quite as believable. Hot Legs and Feet makes up for it with the lesbian scenes. There is an added level of sensuality when it is two women.
All good things come to an end -- at nearly 3,000 scenes with sparse updates, it looks like Hot Legs and Feet might be nearing their end.
Bottom Line:
If I was to pick two sites or networks to score highest they would be Kink and DDF. The network included with Hot Legs and Feet is one of the best and most diverse networks.
Hot Legs and Feet is the best site for reverse foot fetishists. The women here do a good job of acting like their feet and legs are not a big deal. The men and women show them their legs and feet are a big deal. I do not feel a lot of sensuality in porn or get the erotic feeling from most porn. This site does both or maybe it is a combination of them.
The use of fishnet hose to showcase the woman's toes, thighs and vagina creates a visual relation between points of sexual interest. Their scenes with stuck stockings becoming impossible to remove while having sex show a precursor to harder bondage acts. It hints at artsy with the struggling female trying to enjoy the sex while fighting her bound hosiery.
There are scenes with the added bonus of the models removing their hose only to wrap them around the man's penis. Is she doing it to to let him feel her silky hose or to hold onto him and not let him get away?
There are enough scenes here to come up with your own conclusions. With nearly 3,000 scenes including a video and picture set each, there is little to no competition for them in terms of quality and quantity.
If you use their tag system you see they have nearly 900 scenes with stockings, hose or leggings in them. Those outnumber the next biggest foot fetish sites in total content. Someone might ask why not join a site with stockings, hose and leggings as their focus; those sites are usually tease sites.
The tagging system works very accurately. I do wish I could use multiple tags to search, but either it doesn't work or they don't have any scenes with mini-skirt, fishnet and handjob.
The most recent 90-100 videos have 4K option. The 1,000 before those have 1080p option and the ones before those have 720p option to download.
If you are into the legs, feet, hose, leggings niches, 1 By Day and House of Taboo mix those in on a regular basis. It is for me the best of the foot fetish sites and a network worth keeping a long-term membership to.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A big foot fetish site with an emphasis on regular foot fetish -- meaning the male and sometimes or female enjoy kissing, touching and licking her feet.
They have 618 scenes, each scene has a photo set and video. They add 1 new scene per week.
Includes access to Adult Time, it changes the original navigation and feel of the site, but works without any major differences or problems.
Someone at the site has a good, working knowledge of foot fetishism. There aren't a lot of male talents used on this site, but the ones that are seem to be real foot fetishists.
High production values for a fetish site.
Cons:
General lack of reverse foot fetish content -- meaning the woman whose feet and legs are being licked, kissed and caressed is only aroused by being the one having it done to her. The women in the scenes seem to be as much into their feet as the men are.
Even as a reverse foot fetishist, I recognize the redundancy of a niche like this one.
I would be happier with it if they focused more on the legs and feet with clothing choices (hose, stockings and leggings) instead of having most of the newer scenes focusing on the bare feet and legs.
Bottom Line:
Foot fetishists are viewed as strange. People generally believe a foot fetishist is someone that walks around with toes on their breath. A foot fetishist doesn't even have to include the feet. It can be the gait of a woman's walk that starts the attraction to her legs and on down, instead of on up.
The newer scenes are disappointing to me. They are shot from an already ready view. The woman is usually already out of her hose or stockings or leggings. A body part fetish -- in my opinion -- should focus on that body part and include what would be called "worship".
The worship here is relegated to kissing, licking, sucking on feet, legs and toes. Did they run out of fishnet stockings? Tight leggings that seduce the man from her ankles up to her knees and back down? It might sound like these are not legitimate negatives, but in a fetish of a body part, that body part should be the most wanted by the person fulfilling the fetish.
They do seem to put a lot of work, time and even money into the scenes, but they have also fallen into the "if ain't broke" mantra. I am sure there are foot fetishist that are happy with that. It just does not appeal as much to a reverse foot fetishist.
The producers of this site -- 21 Sextury -- also have the site 21 Foot Art. It has more content for reverse foot fetishists. This site is a good site for foot lovers. I have heard a lot of male foot fetishists love to see the woman alternate sucking on her own toes and the guy's penis. They feature that "position" in a lot of their scenes. I am surprised they don't have a category for it.
Four of the male actors are prominently featured on foot fetish sites -- Charlie Dean, Toby, Kristof Cale and Vince Carter. This is one niche that requires the male to do more than get it up, stick it in, last 20 minutes and give a good ejaculation. They have to be able to focus on the feet, legs and toes while doing all those other parts.
The female models are mostly very pretty, European and do at least enjoy having their feet kissed and licked. As someone that discovered their own interest in this niche, I sometimes wonder about he female model's enjoyment and real interest in the fetish. I am saying this is one time I would like to see the female models talk about which parts (toe licking/sucking, sole licking, entire leg licking) turns them on most, but their inability to speak English limits that interaction.
Minor improvements are needed, but most of those are subjective. It would rate a little higher if they relied more on clothes than shoes/strap sandals. It's a very good deal within an Adult Time membership.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Men begging for a pegging.
Most of the scenes are believable.
Around 450 scenes with new scenes being added twice a month.
An underrated niche that is -- according to research -- more common than we think.
Some of the scenes lead you into the what did I just watch feeling, but most of the guys believably enjoy being dominated by the wide array of Kink models.
Included with the Kink network, which has 83 other Kink sites.
Cons:
A few of the women models do not do a very good job of convincing the viewer they are dominating the man.
I would like to see gangbang action, 3 or 4 women with strap-ons, taking turns on the guy.
Going against the first con, some of the women do too good of a job of convincing they dominated the man.
Bottom Line:
I have been a member of Kink's network since the launch day. I like the debauchery of their content.
Divine Bitches is my favorite Kink site. It is not perfect. None of the Kink sites are. You have to come into these sites with a suspension of disbelief. That is why Divine Bitches is a good site for me. The guys do a believable enough job of making you think they are willing to let the woman stick her dildo up their butt - just so they can get closer to her. I have seen numbers as high as 20% of married couples have experimented with pegging. Of the married couples I know, the number is even higher.
There is not a lot of story in these scenes. Kink sometimes can get too deep into a story. The setting and feel of the scenes has changed over the years. The older scenes relied on a very attractive female model seducing her boy toy into bending over for her. He was usually given -- in trade -- vaginal intercourse with her. The settings included doctor's offices, bedrooms, hotels, the more recent scenes go to a more dominant style of the female giving him no choice. He could be tied up, blindfolded, whipped into submission or in a few of the newer ones, the female is much bigger physically.
All Kink scenes have a short part at the end where the males, females involved in the scene talk about the experience and how much they enjoyed it.
There are scenes that include cuckolds. Those are not common, but are as believable as any cuckold scene is. It usually involves the acting wife to use her strap-on on her acting husband, in his butt, in his mouth, while the other man has sex with her or receives a blowjob from her.
This is common on Kink, the older scenes, are usually the best ones. One disappointment for me is Kink seems to no longer look for that one model that can consistently pull the niche/scene off. Mia Little has been featured several times in the last year; she is good at this niche, but they almost always put the man in bondage.
My favorite recent scene features Aaliyah Love dominating Corbin Dallas. As small as she is and as many times as she has been the submissive one, she seems to channel an inner dominatrix. Her and Corbin seem to really enjoy the scene.
The scenes are very long for scenes without much story and with usually only two people -- averaging in the 50 minutes to 70 minutes range -- you get your money's worth out of these scenes.
I would be remiss to say some straight men probably would not like this content. Some of the scenes do get very rough. There are some in the older scenes where you think the guy's balls are going to literally explode from the rope torture. The content has been toned down now. It is like watching a regular porn scene except it does not start with the woman on her knees, but she usually is on her knees at the end of the scene.
With a year subscription, I do not download a lot, the scenes can be very large in file size. Their streaming player works very well for me. Against the type of site it is, some of the best scenes, are the ones where the woman starts to laugh -- in a feeling sorry for him way. I would like to see them bring more of the mainstream models in to shoot these scenes. There are several scenes where the female pats the male on the back and hugs him like she is sorry she is doing that bad thing to him.
I like the dark humor in Kink's style of porn and Divine Bitches does dark humor as good as any of their sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
More naked men than an orgy in Rome
Streaming feature works well
488 advertised "straight guy" scenes...
Good price and has gift card join option...
No annoying ads
Easy signup and cancellation
Downloads are unlimited and can be downloaded with a download manager.
Cons:
488 advertised straight guy scenes with 200+ of them having the straight guy having sex with another man.
The gift card join option charges more than the regular pay option charges.
Videobox Men should have a blend of content for gay men to watch and for straight women to watch. If the title was Gay Videobox, I would not complain about it.
Video quality is average or below.
Bottom Line:
My first experience with pay porn was Videobox. I joined it in 2011 or 2012 for 2 years. It came with a free Roku.
It was only natural for me to give Videobox Men a try. I knew it was aimed at gay men, but it also features "straight men" on their preview. After all, the site is named Videobox Men, not Gay Videobox, which I think it was once named.
I should have expected less. The site offered a 1 month membership for $12 or I could trade in a gift card. I had a $20 gift card from a store that I no longer am near. I entered it to trade it for a membership. The $20 gift card turned into 16 days access. If paying cash it is 40 cents a day. If paying with a gift card it is $1.25 a day. I had no use for the gift card so I pushed forward with the higher exchange rate.
I opened the categories and went to "straight men". This is from the first 32 scenes that showed up -- 16 had men having sex with another man and 2 of the others included men give themselves auto-fellatio. I understand there is a market for gay men to see a straight man seduced into sex with a gay men, but should it be called "straight man"? The straight men category only makes up 488 of 9,253 scenes.
I tried the "solo" category. This number is not going to be as poorly labeled as the straight man category was, but of the first 32 "solo" scenes, 7 have men having sex with each other. Solo equals one person.
I found some of straight men masturbating. Some of those looked like they were recorded before I was born. The videos had a yellow tint in the background like a vintage newspaper. The videos had skips like old film projectors had. You cannot watch a man masturbate with the screen bouncing up and down.
I did find some newer DVDs they have with names like, "Men of Erdine", "Men of Istanbul" that might be straight men masturbating. Nothing great for me -- born in India -- and not attracted to Middle Eastern men, but maybe they are adding some solo straight scenes.
I have tried to watch gay scenes. Some are okay, but it is not very realistic for a woman to fantasize that hairy man taking it up the butt is her. The solo scenes at least can let a woman feel like we are the one recording or we are masturbating along with the man.
I have a negative feeling about this site even for gay men. Most of the videos seem generic. Even if others do not see a problem with the category problem -- I think it shows a lack of attention for detail -- and would believe it is not just a problem in the categories I used in this review with those problems. I feel bad for those that subscribe mostly to gay porn. The quality does not seem to be there; neither is the care we see in straight sites.
My score includes some points for more than half of the newest solo DVDs being of what appear to be straight men. They have one called All-American Beauties. The men are believably straight, but one of them masturbates with a pumpkin and another sticks his penis in a seashell. The voyeuristic quality of watching them masturbate with odd objects is okay, but I would start laughing at both of them.
That is the other reason I feel bad for those buying gay porn. There is a lack of production quality.
I only would recommend it if you have a gift card to a store without a quality website or location within 1,000 miles of you.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
