| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
Prime Cups
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site for the big, nice, boob lovers.
184 scenes and while not updating, there are some 4K scenes so it’s been updated some.
A major turn-on for me, most of the cumshots go on the female’s boobs.
I want to say these are some of Europe’s biggest name models. I recognize several names including Nekane and Anissa Kate.
Pleasing backgrounds and settings with most of the scenes in a house with neutral/white colors.
High quality on the videos, downloadable picture sets too |
| Cons: |
It hasn’t been updated in a year and it looks like they even recycled some OR they remastered some old scenes to HD quality. The newest scenes top out at 720p and 1080p, while a lot of their newer scenes have 4K.
It’s one of those sites that seems like it should be bigger than it is like part of the content is gone or missing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site doesn’t fool around with any tricks or surprises or gimmicks. These are busty women, many of them are slim built and I do believe all or most are all-natural with no implants. The models are very attractive and I’m going to con this one a little – professional. It’s a complaint I have with the site that I believe is purely subjective and therefore chose not to list it as a con. Some of these models just look bored. The scenes feature full sex, anal sex, oral and some titty-sex, but the scenes with more than one woman, usually the one not getting much attention looks like she would rather be doing anything else. Maybe they are going for that?
This is a site that the cumshot shows back up as my favorite part. I love watching how other women react to cum hitting their boobs and bodies. The site’s scene count does seem low to me at only 184 scenes, but I only say that because the site’s first scene was uploaded on December 6, 2005. That’s nearly 16 years and only 184 scenes. It creates some frustration with this site. When it first started they were updating once a week. Only the newest 30 scenes are from the last decade. Which has its positives and negatives to it. I’m learning the European models from a decade ago were quite a bit more attractive to me than the current European models are, but you then have the possibility of poor video quality. I can at least say there’s some good news. At least half of the scenes have at worst 720p and 1080p download options. Some of the newer ones have 4K. Also, so of the older scenes that don’t have 720p or 1080p at least have 540p. I find those still watchable. The oldest scenes drop down into the 384p area and while watchable are just not that good.
I find it surprising this site hasn’t updated more or wasn’t more successful than it looks like it was. Nearly every scene has a 4.25 user rating or higher on a 5 scale. And it’s earned. The scenes could be looked at as an opposite of facial scenes. It’s sex that leads to a body cumshot with these very nice boobs taking the center stage. There are some stunning models on this site as well, ones I have never seen or heard of. The scenes are typically long (by current standards), nearing the 40 minute average on most. The tags help more on this site than most, especially depending on your preference. Some of the scenes don’t have any anal or vaginal sex. You can find those with the tags, if the tags are accurate. I do think the possibility of sex happening in some scenes, while others don’t have sex, also makes the site more interesting than your average porn site. You have to watch the scenes.
The picture sets are definitely worth looking into. This group or studio seems to be big on quality and it shows in the pictures as much, if not more, than in the videos. These are some of the crispest photos I’ve seen. The score could be and would be a lot higher if there was a reason to believe there will be more of these scenes, but there is a feeling that this site has stopped updating unless they are remastering, which I do have a reason to believe they have done on 4 scenes. The score will reflect both sides of it. I really like the content, the models, and everything that’s going on with the site, but you may only need to join it once to get everything you want. This would be a good place to add the download speeds are good. I have a 100M speed internet and download above average what I do on other sites. |
|
09-07-21 04:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
77
|
Cum For Cover
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site about a lot of cumming men and the women willing to try and use their faces and mouths to catch it.
This is going to appeal to those into “almost” bisexual men.
It’s also going to appeal to those that like watching women see how fast they can make multiple men cum.
There are 98 scenes and I have a feeling I will download all 98 (something I usually don’t do)
Very pretty women for this type of porn. I even knew a couple (Veronica Leal and Anastasia Brokelyn) |
| Cons: |
It seems to be a trend with this group. There are scenes from pre-2008, a large space of nothing, then the scenes started back, causing some inconsistency in the quality.
No new updates in 10 months. |
| Bottom Line: |
I will start with why I said this could appeal to “almost” bisexual male fans. Some of these women aren’t messing around. You stick 5-6 dicks in their face and they’ll stick two, even three of them in their mouth at the same time. You also get the part probably only women notice like when the one guy cums really hard and it hits one of the other guys on accident. Talk about having to work in a dangerous environment.
What impresses me most is the length of these scenes. Most are at least 40 minutes long. That means these women are most likely going through these 5-8 guys without any editing and getting all 5-8 of them off. It’s impressive especially when you see how pretty some of the models are. They do not look like they should be in this type of porn. They look more like they should be in softcore porn, being feminine and pretty. But here they are swapping 5-8 dicks in and out of their mouths and hands. A few of the older scenes do have two women in them instead of just one. I believe there’s a market for this niche. There are the women like me who wonders what it would be like to have this many men standing nude in front of me and there are the men who maybe fantasize about being in a group of men having their way with a beautiful woman.
I am going to mention the picture sets. These are professional quality photo sets that focus on the model. Those make for a good footnote to the scenes. Just when you’re watching her weave her way through the web of dicks, look back at her clothed picture and how pretty and even innocent she looks.
I think this site more than any from this group leaves me wanting more. I have watched these types of scenes from other studios, but these are really good, even the poorer video quality old scenes. These sites could really get away, at least with me, with focusing on remastering their older videos instead of worrying about new updates. The content is that good.
You get 98 scenes, there is enough inconsistency in the video quality, I can’t even put a number on how many scenes have 1080p and 720p, I can say 19 have 4K, 1080p and 720p, just glancing over the rest it looks like half of the scenes have 720p and 1080p, those have the little HD badge on them, but they’re mixed up so maybe they have been doing some remastering.
It’s a niche I believe has more potential than the porn companies seem to believe. It’s another site that I won’t score too high since it does look like they’re not going to update anymore, but will score high enough to say give it a look. |
|
09-07-21 04:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
78
|
Adult Prime
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Can watch on desktop, tablet, mobile, television, smart tv, Apple tv and Chromecast.
Updates from 86 studios.
Huge network with more than 17500 videos, 18,000 photos.
The trusted billers are Segpay or Epoch.
Discounted price from Pornusers.
Multiple updates across the network. |
| Cons: |
It's one of those networks that one month membership is not going to be enough.
Downloads were a bit slower than I am used to and that aids in needing more than one month membership. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network has to be one of the best you can find. They have pretty much everything you could ask for, in large amounts and quality. You can find gay, bi, interracial, gangbangs, amateurs, skinny models, older models both male and female, classy story driven scenes, an award winning hot website and even a good amount of older vintage porn.
With 86 studios it is hard to describe all you get for your membership, which by the way is reasonably priced due to a discount from Pornusers. These are the biggest sites and these I feel are the most interesting. Most sites are updating and the scenes from the last few years are in HD.
BB Videos 422 scenes-German amateur porn, updating
Club Sweethearts 7096 scenes-European teens to early twenties, updating
Daring Sex 745 scenes-European, very high quality and multiple award winning, updating
Elegant Raw 304 scenes- European, excellent quality with many interracial black on white, not updating since last December
Fucking Skinny 542 scenes-European very thin models, updating
Group Sex games 241 scenes-European, lots of gang bangs, oldest videos are of sex games, excellent quality, updating
Jim Slip 750 scenes-UK older younger/industry icon where many pornstars have early or even first scenes, updating
Oldie X 498 scenes-European, older/ younger, updating
Pornstar Classics 2419 scenes-vintage
Rodox 1376 scenes-vintage
Submissed 771 scenes-European, eight bondage/BDSM sites, updating
Vintage Classic Porn 434 scenes-vintage
Young Busty 1250 scenes, updating
Some other sites that are included on the same themes. For example there is more vintage porn on other sites I did not list, BDSM and sites that focus on older/younger parings of older men and also older women. Some themes don’t have a site that specializes in that, but you can do a network search and find the content. Some examples are anal, blowjobs or lesbian. The ones I felt were the best include of course Club Sweethearts with nearly 7100 videos. These are teen to early twenties European models who are early in their career. I am sure for many this may be their only scene ever. The men they are paired with look to be about the same age, so they look like they possibly could be boyfriend/girlfriend. The same age and type of models are also on Fucking Skinny and Young Busty. The best in overall quality are the scenes on Daring Sex. It has won industry awards for Best Studio, Best Stars, Best Production and Best feature Film.
The member’s page is a bit different and takes some getting used to. It is not too difficult and everything is there that you need. The oldest parts of some of the sites are Standard Definition as they go back to the early 2000’s. The vintage scenes are what they are. This have to have the most vintage porn I have seen anywhere ever.
There are no download limits imposed by the network, but you will need more than a monthly subscription to check everything out. Then, you can take a look at all the streaming only content that is available as a bonus. |
|
08-31-21 08:46am
Replies (2)
|
Review
79
|
Pure POV
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Really pretty models shot in POV.
Long to longer scenes in the 30-45 minute range.
Despite being a small site (70 scenes) and the updates stopping over a decade ago, the content is either remastered or they were releasing 1080p videos over a decade ago. The technical quality doesn’t show the age of the site.
Videos are downloadable as are professional photo sets and also downloadable screenshots.
Good diversity in the scenes/action. The site doesn’t stick to one formula from scene to scene. |
| Cons: |
It’s a difficult con to list since I wouldn’t have known it if the dates on the scenes hadn’t told me this site hasn’t been updated in over 10 years.
Other than that and the small collection of 70 scenes, I am someone who likes POV and 70 scenes of high quality POV isn’t really a con to me, but believe it should be listed in cons. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is one of those that makes me wonder what other sites have been doing for the last 15 years. The newest update on this site is nearly 13 years old, but the models are very pretty and the quality of the video only drops out on the oldest 20 scenes. It even only drops to 540p. The rest of the scenes have 720p and 1080p download options.
The lack of story is expected due to it being European. I’m still waiting on more of those European studios to discover the use of English subtitles. The POV filming on this site is very good. You get various locations, some cosplay, indoors, outdoors, and it looks like this site at one time was a pretty big deal. I do not know these models, but have read multiple PU members talk about the European models of the 2000s and I see what they mean. There’s hardly a dud in any of these models. The action is professional and maybe that could be not as good to some. There’s not a lot of variance or uniqueness other than the POV camera.
If I have any complaint about the content it’s that some of the scenes just seem too casual. One of the scenes has a woman doing anal and she looks like she’s just sitting back watching a television show. There are no scenes with more than two people in the scene and I usually do find that as a negative. I believe porn needs to look into the competitive aspect of having multiple women in one scene with one man. It just seems like when it’s one on one there’s not as much energy.
I do believe the site is at least worth looking into if you’re into POV and especially blonde models. There are multiple blonde models on this site that really stand out to me. Their names are generic enough that I don’t know if there’s anyway to look them up, like Sabrina, Ildiko and Eva.
There are 70 scenes. Those can be downloaded with no limits and there are downloadable photo sets as well as downloadable screenshots. I could see downloading 40-50 of the scenes they do have and being happy with that. I’m not going to score it as high as the quality deserves to be scored, just because there seems to be no way they’ll ever start updating this site again, but will score it high enough to at least nudge you to check it out if you get the chance. I’m pleasantly surprised with the content. |
|
08-31-21 08:38am
Replies (0)
|
Review
80
|
MILF Thing
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A MILF site that I believe has unlimited potential – if they can keep it going.
There are currently 70 scenes and it’s a tale of three eras. I haven’t seen a site that needs to get a push behind it more than this one.
There was a new update last week, the previous update was last year, the newest 13 scenes all have 4K and show the unlimited potential.
Dirty, hardcore, kinky, and exactly what I expect from a real Milf aged woman faced with hard dicks.
While the overall quality is not great, it is better than expected with more than half of the scenes having at least 720p and 1080p, and 13 having 4K. There are also downloadable pictures and screenshots.
A site that other “Milf” sites should look to for reference on what is Milf aged pornstars. |
| Cons: |
A tale of three eras. This site has scenes from 2007 – 2021 and there’s only 70 scenes. If you can get past that, you’re in for a real treat.
The older scenes do only have 540p download option, but the scenes are encoded well and are watchable.
No idea when they’re going to update. |
| Bottom Line: |
I really like the Milf niche of porn, and usually find myself torn on whether that should be generational or if it should be biologically accurate. Biologically accurate would say a Milf, in porn, could be as young as 18. I prefer the generational usage of it pertaining to women in their 30s, maybe 40s, who are more experienced and that’s what this site nails. I don’t know these models. Some may not be in their 30s or 40s, but their sexual actions say they are very experienced. That’s what I like in Milf porn.
The tale of three eras: It looks like this site started out well-before the popularity of Milf porn started. Of their 70 scenes, 57 were released in 2007 and 2008. I don’t know when Milf porn became popular, but I wasn’t watching much porn in 2007 or 2008 and only started noticing an overflow of Milf porn sites over the last 6-7 years. The good thing about those 2007-2008 scenes is 35 of those 57 have 720p and 1080p download options on the videos. You’re not getting a big drop in quality despite the 15 years of scenes. The newest 13 scenes have from mobile up to 720p, 1080p and 4K, which shows they have at least started to film some newer scenes.
My descriptions of what makes this site so good at what it does (Milf), won’t be appealing to all porn fans, but it will be to those who like Milf porn the way I do. There are some implants, there are some tattoos, there are some models that look like they got their makeup done at the local beauty school. There’s what I’m going to regrettably call a little bit of trashiness to the models. Please, keep in mind, I do not consider trashiness to be a bad thing. Especially in these type of scenes. The Milf is riding one guy and another guy walks in, she spreads her butt cheeks to give him a hole too. This is what regular, I’m going to say, American Milf porn fails at. This is hardcore, it’s a Milf cutting loose, giving a double blowjob, getting double penetrated and loving every minute of it.
You can say the newer scenes cause some disappointment. It looks like they are really excelling in this niche on those newer scenes, but you’re not going to get many new scenes unless they decide to start shooting more. Which I would start a petition for. I don’t like rough scenes – usually. But these give a different perception. These women perform like this is exactly what they want. They want two guys, one pulling her hair, one putting her in the wrestling type hold called the anal nelson. They do not wince, they don’t whimper, they have no problem at all taking any and everything these guys give them.
The newest scene alone is so good I would pay the price just for it. It has a woman I’ve never heard named Dominica Fonix (spelled Phoenix in another part of the site) and for 56 minutes, she wears two men out by herself. It looks like her sexual peak, peaked and it all came out in this one scene. There are other very good scenes on this site as well. How many times do you see a woman having a threesome with two men doing all this at the same time, she’s sucking one guy, rubbing his balls too, a dick in her pussy, while using her other hand to rub her clit? That’s a Milf! I do think I have to be realistic with the score just because at the current update rate there may not be another scene, but if you’re into Milfs that fit the Milf generational category, who are at their sexual peak and can take anything sexual thrown at them while looking pretty AND a little trashy/slutty, you owe it to yourself to check this site out. |
|
08-31-21 08:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
81
|
All Internal
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Hardcore site with creampies and quite a few threesomes.
Pretty European models that don’t speak a bit of English.
Positions that I don’t see a lot in porn that look like should be used more often, visually stimulating.
Seems to be updating on an inconsistent schedule with 1 update in August, 5 in July.
Excellent technical quality and easy to use website.
They have 590 scenes with video, pro photo set and screenshots with each scene. |
| Cons: |
I don’t know why, but once you show me threesomes, the male/female scenes become boring.
A few scenes in newest updates look to be older scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have started watching for the recycling problem in porn and wish I didn’t. It becomes an obsession of looking numbers up and trying to decide if a scene really is new or not. Currently, the 9th newest update doesn’t have a 4K download option and that makes me think it has been recycled from the past. Their own technical superiority causes that. Of their newest 250 scenes, all of the videos have a 4K download option except that one. It makes that one stick out like a sore thumb.
Besides that, this is a really good site if you like creampies. I can’t say I do. I don’t hate them either, but a big turn-on for me when watching porn is watching the guy cum outside the woman. The action itself nearly makes up for it. These scenes are very well edited, produced and there’s a real feeling of heat and passion between the male and female models.
The threesome scenes make the site. It’s hard for me to believe these are not bisexual males with a woman. They are not and there’s no bisexual male action (or score would be higher), but I’m not used to seeing what is two straight males be this passionate with a woman in a threesome unless it’s bisexual males. Very impressed with that part.
The rest of the site has almost no downfalls. There are 590 scenes, right at 250 of those have 4K video downloads and you have to go back to the first 90 scenes to find ones without 720p or 1080p downloads. That gives them 250 scenes with 4K down to mobile and 500 scenes total with at least 1080p and 720p down to mobile. The models are surprisingly attractive to me. I usually do not find European models this attractive, but this studio seems to draw top drawer talent. There’s a lot of anal, some DPs, including dual internal cumshots which is at least something I hadn’t seen before.
The tags are useful, but have questionable accuracy. Which is kind of a letdown as the site is quite large to dig through this many scenes.
I usually don’t comment on the settings, but most of the scenes are filmed in what looks like very upscale houses, possibly hotels and I believe it does add to the quality of these scenes. Do people really go to upscale hotels to have wild threesomes? There are also group scenes with as many as two couples, there are a few foursomes with 3 men, triple penetrating the woman and giving her triple internal cumshots. I believe the most I have seen in one scene was a 3 female, 2 male scene. The scenes are all over 30 minutes and I think once you have 4-5 people in the scene the need for a story goes away.
This is one of the better sites I’ve joined. If they had slipped a few bisexual men scenes in and more outside the body cumshots, I would have scored it even higher. The action itself is about as good as I’ve seen in the male/female world of porn. I will mention just to show much I like seeing bisexual men, a few of the scenes with multiple men with one woman does have the woman touching the penises together. I guess they get tease points with me for that. |
|
08-31-21 08:31am
Replies (0)
|
Review
82
|
Smut Puppet
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There are close to 2000 videos across the network.
Downloads were fast enough.
Three different download options as to quality. Two are HD, but not 4K.
There is a nice mix of beautiful American and European models.
The site is easy to use. |
| Cons: |
Mentions cam site with ads on every page.
The network has not updated since March.
Some videos seem to be remastered as the quality is sometimes not what I expected. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is an interesting network in many ways and there is a lot to see here. The details breakdown like this:
3 Way Fuck – Some with two men, some with two women. Last update 2020
Black and Big – Huge very dark black men with white women. Last update was 2019
Blondes Love Dick - Last update 2020
Brunettes Love Dick - Last update January 2021
Cougar Kingdom – MILFS with older and younger men. Last update 2016
Dark Sodomy – Black men with mostly but all white women, Anal. Last update 2021
Do The Wife – Cuckolding . Many are white husband watching wife with black man. Last update 2021
GenLez – Standard lesbian action. Last update 2021
Golden Slut – Older women about 50 more or less and younger guys. Last update 2020.
Granny Vs BBC – Mostly in their fifties women with much younger black men There is a lot of anal. Last update 2019.
Group Fuck Site – Four or fivesomes. Last update 2020.
Mature Fucks Teen – Older/Younger but not big age difference. Last update 2021
MILF Sodomy – Anal sex with older models, but not much different age than the men. Last update 2021.
Smut Merchants – A little of everything, but I did not see interracial or older/younger. Last update 2018
Sugga Bunny – Black women mostly with black men, some interracial. Last update 2021.
Team Fucks Girl – gangbangs, some interracial and some even with Asian women. Last update 2019
Teen Erotica XXX – They look like barely legal and very young. Last update 2021.
What I see here are a few themes. One is that there are a lot of interracial videos and some of them have a focus that you don’t often see, like cuckolding, or only anal, or older women.
Another theme is that there are also older/younger pairings and some are older women with younger men, which is uncommon in porn. For the most part, the scenes are straight to the action, but a few have a little bit storyline.
The models are familiar ones from the United States and Europe of recent years and are attractive to downright gorgeous. The site works well enough and it is easy to search for what you want to see. I would have liked 4K as an option, but HD is just fine. Download speeds were adequate and I found no limits on what I can keep.
Unfortunately, it looks like the site no longer is adding new videos. Some of the sites have not updated in a few years. Every page in the members’ area has ads for the cam site, but the link leads nowhere. I like that you get almost 2000 videos, but the quality varies quite a bit between the older videos and the most recent. But, at least you get some unusual themes for porn and links to discounts for other sites. |
|
08-31-21 08:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
83
|
Sperm Swap
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The best thing about this niche is you always get at least 2 women for each guy
Very high quality and recent updates.
A total of 209 scenes with videos, photos and screenshots, all are downloadable.
I’m continually surprised by how attractive I find these European models.
Scenes are long, some as long as an hour. |
| Cons: |
It’s not really a niche I’m that into myself. The whole swapping spit or cum or bodily fluids never really did much for me.
Even though updates have been coming in there’s no consistency to when the next one will be. Maybe they’ll prove me wrong with two in July 2021, and one so far in August 2021. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of those niches I never really understood why it’s considered a niche. The sperm swap takes up maybe 30 seconds to 1 minute of the scene while the other 50+ minutes is at least a threesome. I feel like the cumshot is the most important part of a porn scene and know a lot of females feel the same way too. I guess we are predisposed to see that as our success when we have sex. So, to catch it in your mouth and spit it in your friend’s mouth, what’s the attraction?
You do still get over 200 scenes of at least threesomes with two attractive women and a man. The scenes are long and both women get a full working over by the man, no hole left untouched. There’s a kinkiness to these threesomes since nearly every scene has anal, vaginal and oral. You’ve got women pulling a dick out of another woman’s butt and sticking it in her mouth. The professional level of these models shows in their performances and in their stamina. I never took that into consideration when looking at scene length. These performers go at it for nearly an hour. They look like it too. By the end of the scenes they are sweaty, body parts are splayed open and messy. Maybe this is how you do hardcore?
I just stop watching once the cumshot has landed in one of the women’s mouths.
There are 209 scenes. The most recent 20 scenes have up to 4K. Before that, things get sketcky. But this is something I have felt with multiple sites from this group. The older scenes do take a hit in technical quality with the videos topping out at 540p, but the women are so pretty and sexy. I do not know most current models, so I definitely don’t know these models. Some of their best scenes on this site are from 2005-2006. Some of those even drop even lower in quality to 384p, which is pushing it, but it’s so hard to ignore the looks of these models. It’s more disappointing, at least for me, that the names do not help. One is Mercedes and Dianne. Those two are two of the sexiest models I’ve seen in porn, but there’s no way to know what other content they have (even on other sites) as their names are common and lacking a surname. That is going to make me lower the score when you combine that fact with the niche or I prefer “gimmick” not appealing to me. I do think it’s worth checking out to look at the models.
I will end with they do have newer scenes, three in the last 2 months, it’s hard to tell if they’re going to restart these sites. Not liking the niche makes this one less of an interest to me, but if I were them, if at all possible, I would remaster those old scenes. There are some scenes there that are really good. I did find watching those old scenes in a media player at 70% of monitor size to be okay, a little blurry, but I would rather watch blurry sexy models than clear unattractive models. |
|
08-31-21 08:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
84
|
My Doll Parts VIP
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Highly unusual and maybe unique site. Feet and nylons, but lesbian in its approach.
Comes with the 71 site Puba Network of mostly solo models.
There are 75 videos and photo sets
All the videos are in High Definition
The biller is Rocketpay |
| Cons: |
No dates on the scenes so it is hard to tell if the site is actively updating.
I did not mind that there are a lot of tattoos, but some people don’t like that. |
| Bottom Line: |
The name My Doll Parts refers to women’s feet and legs. This review is for the official site of pornstar Kayla Jane Danger. She is very tattooed and that may turn off some potential members, but not me. I found her very pretty and sexy too.
There is a focus on making the models glamorous by using fetish vintage nylons, pantyhose, sexy lingerie, high heels, stripping, tan lines and teasing. Sometimes there is an old retro type of focus and you feel you are on a high quality vintage site, but in High Definition. What is unusual, and maybe even unique, is that the focus is on women teasing and being sexy with other women. There is not a single male on the site. You see foot exhibition of course, but also toe licking and sucking, as well as foot licking and sucking. Feet are inserted in vaginas. Feet are treated as sex objects to be worshipped, maybe even more so than the usual female parts. You get the feeling this is a closet, forbidden, naughty fetish that you are allowed see and you did not know women did these things behind closed doors. I love that the pace is slow moving and lets the viewer linger on the objects of desire. The use of close-ups increases the eroticism too. The camerawork is nearly magical. There is some masturbation focusing on her feet, but this is mostly a lesbian site. Some more standard lesbian themes you see are pussy and anal licking, fingering, and toys. Sometimes the lesbian seems to focus on domination, but it is very light and not like in BDSM.
The models are Americans and there is some diversity. My favorite here was Marica Hase, who is so pretty she makes my mouth water. The search is very basic and not all that helpful. Mostly it is useful for the entire network and not so much for an individual site. I did not find a list of the models, but the site says there are over 20.
Downloads were fast and there are 75 videos. It is impossible to tell how often there are updates as the site does not give dates.
The biller is Rocketpay. Many people don’t like that they store your credit card information, but I find it convenient. You save steps as you don’t to manually input your card information. PU has a discount price of $19.95 a month. |
|
08-31-21 08:16am
Replies (0)
|
Review
85
|
OldieX
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Almost 500 videos and you also get Adult Prime
Inexpensive with four download options and the best is 4K
A wide variety of types of sex
Uses well known billers
Pornusers has a discount |
| Cons: |
I found that many models are not attractive
Similar to the previous con you have to limit your expectations on overall performance too. |
| Bottom Line: |
When I signed up for Adult Prime, I joined mostly for the pretty young ladies. But going through the sites that it comes with, I discovered this one. It has scenes on it with one of my favorite themes older/younger. Most sites with older/younger are young ladies paired with older men. You find many videos here that are older women with younger men and even older couples with a younger woman or man. Sometimes there are combinations and group scenes that were a surprise to me, for example one young man and a group of older women.
For the most part the older men look very distinguished with gray facial hair. Some of the old guys are bald, but all of them look the role. Some sites pair the models with those who are close in age, but here the age differences were stark. This lends a fantasy aspect to the scenes and I love the way they stimulate my imagination. The scenes with the older women I did not care for that much. I felt the women are not very attractive and quite a few are out of shape and frumpy. In the scenes where there are two women, one older and one younger and there is also a guy, they never go lesbian. I feel that two women hot for one man would naturally get into the mood for each other too. The younger women were very pretty, but they were not doing extreme sex as much as the older women were.
I did not recognize any of the models, but many of them are in multiple scenes. This led me to lose the fantasy. The site needs more models who are in only one scene. They look European and not American, but I can’t place where these models are from. I suspect some are amateurs. The sex is surprisingly varied. Yes you see the usual oral, vaginal and an occasional anal scene. The guys eat pussy a lot. You also get cuckold scenes where one of the two guys is a pretend husband who eats the cum from the other guy. There are scenes where the woman uses a strapon on a guy. I am not a fan of cuckold scenes or strapon ones, but I admit they were quite out of my expectations.
The scenes have watermarks from other sites within the Adult Prime network, so they are probably exclusive to the network, but not the site. There are almost 500 videos to download and it is actively adding updates quite often. For August it has averaged at about one every three days. There are four download options and the best is 4K. The downloads were fast and the site easy to use. Adult Prime includes over 70 sites and is a good value with a discount from Porn Users. |
|
08-31-21 08:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
86
|
Love Her Feet
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pornusers discount of only $12.95 for a month
Top quality production values with 240 scenes and about six updates per month.
Easy search function
Every model has perfect feet and pedicures
Models are all well known Americans who are stunningly beautiful
Download quality as high as 4K |
| Cons: |
I would like more than 6 new updates per month or a bigger archive.
If you're not into foot fetishes you probably won't like this site as much as I do. |
| Bottom Line: |
The director is Andrew Youngman who has directed 1000’s of porn movies over the past 20 years. He is one of the few porn directors I follow the content of. His dream was to make the best porn foot fetish site in the world. He tries to get every camera angle as strategically chosen to make for the best scene possible. Every frame of every scene has the feet as the focus. The production values are beautiful as you see an attention to detail that is highly uncommon in porn.
There are models who wear pantyhose, stockings and heels and their legs look invitingly fantastic. In every scene there is a different premise. Sometimes it is family like stepsister and brother, in other scenes it may be older younger, or power differences like attorney and client or tutor and student. In every scene the man is so turned on by her feet that he literally cannot help but get carried away. There is plenty of toe sucking to be sure, but there are also plenty of footjobs where her feet massage his cock. In every scene the sex comes next and the heat from the foot foreplay builds to a climax. The action flows naturally as for example in a scene where he rubs his dick on her feet and then she is inspired to give him a footjob. He comes on her feet with a nice cumshot visual that I really like. In some scenes she licks his cum off her feet. It does not get any better than that. I saw an awe inspiring hot scene where a foot job lead to a blowjob. In another he is fucking her face and she offers him her feet to suck on. He goes back and forth. If I can imagine a foot scene, it probably is on this site.
Many of the tags are designed for a foot site. Where else do you see a tag for nail polish color or size of her feet? The site is very easy to use and the downloads were fast. You can even get the scenes in 4K. The models are well known Americans who have made many scenes before. I suspect that many have not done foot fetish videos though. The attractiveness of the models is a given and there is a nice level of racial variety too. I love foot fetish videos and I feel this Is my new favorite site. Even better is that the price is only $13 for a month. |
|
08-31-21 08:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
87
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Superior technical quality, anal-centered, including DPs
520 scenes with downloadable photos and videos.
Long scenes (40-60 minutes is common)
Extensive tagging system that may go further than needed.
It is updating, but there is no set schedule and some updates may be questionable with a scene in May seemingly being Christmas-themed.
Pro models with the pros and cons that come with that. |
| Cons: |
Scenes are formulaic despite the long duration.
The updates do concern me. Two some months, 0 in one month, four in one month. It balances out if you have a year membership, but not as good if you’re on a monthly membership.
European pro models can be very inconsistent OR robotic, there’s not a lot of middle ground. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is going to mark off a lot of “good” check boxes. The videos are long, the photo sets are real photo sets, not screencaps, they also have screencaps too and the quality if impressive. Nearly 200 of their 520 scenes have 4K in their download options.
This is an odd one for me. As much as I prefer long scenes, the long scenes on this site do not really have anything to do with story or building of a story. The scenes are just 40-60 minutes of hardcore sex. Their tagging system reminds me of the long length videos too. One scene has 44 tags. Some of the tags are also not very specific like, “watery” and “casual” or “fake” is that fake boobs? Fake action? Fake cum?
The theme doesn’t change in these scenes. It’s very straightforward that you’re going to see all three orifices of the woman penetrated and for those into dual penetration they have a tag for that. They even have tags for dual penetration positions like DP-Cowgirl, DP-Standing, DP-Reverse Cowgirl. I can’t be negative about the action and do think it’s why these professional models are better suited by sites like this. These models seem to be used to the camera, the dual penetration, the rigors of a 40-60 minute hardcore scene, sometimes with two men. It’s very watchable. I usually would feel uncomfortable with scenes like these since so many sites try to show the model in pain or looking like she’s being forced. This site gets a “good job” star on their report card for making clean, watchable, sexy, visually pleasing porn.
The download options are also extensive: It does look like they may encode their videos a little high. They have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p, mobile, a high res photo zip file that has photos that are 5700x3600 resolution and a screenshots zip download.
I believe it just comes down to your mood. You’re not going to get much story. The models are very attractive and seem to not only enjoy the scenes, but even give very real performances. It’s polished porn, but I believe in this hardcore of a niche that’s not that common. This niche seems more suited for a dark room with a couple of amateurs. I like the site. On the videos and the encoding, the 720p videos are encoded at 4500-5000 bitrate and it does make the files large, especially when combined with the length of the scenes. Some of the 4K scenes are nearly 20GB each. Complaining about a site excelling at something isn’t much of a complaint. |
|
08-31-21 08:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
88
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large, hardcore site focused on anal sex.
854 scenes with 2 updates per month.
Up to 4K video downloads on newer scenes.
Each scene has a professional quality downloadable photo set.
The models are professionals and most are European. The average model on this site is at least attractive. |
| Cons: |
Hopefully, you are just on the site for the porn/sex. This site has little to no plot to the scenes and very little talking or set up.
At least for me, the guys are a mixed bag when it comes to attractiveness. It could be the European part.
Scenes are long which is usually a pro for me, but with no story or set up, the length is just a show of the long, I would even say dullness of the content. |
| Bottom Line: |
Asshole Fever is a site that I believe is love or hate. If you absolutely love anal sex and no story, it may satisfy you, but for me the site falls short.
On the technical side of things they do everything right. The newer scenes have video downloads from 140p to 4K. Those can also be streamed in a streaming player that works well. The picture sets are even good quality, around 150 photos per set and high resolution or low resolution download zips. The site works well, but when your content is this narrow of a niche, there isn’t a lot of work needed to keep the site from being confusing. You’re going to get basic, shallow, anal sex in each scene. I usually don’t look into European sites. My little experience with porn tells me European sites are often too straightforward (which may not mean shallow to you) and to the point. There needs to be more to keep my interest and attention.
The female models are attractive and if I could give the site a positive comment about their content, most of this is not violent, or ultra-hardcore anal. Some of the scenes even remind me of what other PU reviewers describe as heartcore.
The site is large with 854 scenes and they are updating -- not on a perfectly set schedule, but do average 2 updates per month. I believe once a site has over 500 scenes they are getting into the area of there’s going to be overkill when the scenes don’t vary much. That is what plagues this site for me. I have nothing against anal sex and have joined and enjoyed anal sites before, but without much communication between the actors, the lack of a story, there starts to be too much working against the site. I even wonder if the one on one aspect of the content hurts it for me. That I have seen there is not even a threesome scene. It’s all one on one and that does create a dilemma for me. Maybe I am thinking the anal genre, it should be more raunchy, or more hardcore, but it’s just not. The scenes are plain and I want to believe a less mainstream act like anal should be more than plain.
This may not even be a negative about the content itself. I usually do not like sites that find one set niche or genre and just do it to death. You can see the negative puzzle coming together. No story, no talking, anal, anal, anal, nothing raunchy or kinky, every scene, over and over. I won’t go that low on the score since I do believe my subjective opinion is hurting the score. The site does most everything right except for parts that I don’t like. It could be okay for others, then the high quality content would be a major pro. For me, I have seen better anal sites. |
|
08-10-21 06:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
89
|
Gender X
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Difficult to call this a transsexual site as the scenes vary (per partner), but each scene does have at least one transsexual in it.
Impressive 248 scenes with new updates 4-5 days per week.
Scenes come with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set.
The site is quite easy to use with a clear “videos” tab, a clear “movies” tab that groups the scenes into a theme, a “stars” tab that lists all the models and a “photos” tab.
I usually am more attracted to the ladyboy-style of transsexuals (smaller frame, usually Asian), but the transsexuals on this site are very attractive even though not really ladyboys.
Professional site design, easy to join and cancel. |
| Cons: |
It does look like this site is a blend of the transsexual scenes taken from all of the Gamma-owned sites. Some are from Evil Angel, some are from Adult Time’s Transfixed, and I am sure that’s why the scene number is high for a relatively newer site and the update frequency is very high for a transsexual site. There is a positive to this which I will go into.
I would like more scenes with transsexuals with females. This is always a con for me on transsexual sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
GenderX is what I am going to say is a compilation site of the transsexual scenes Gamma records. This is a positive in some ways. You can get the new transsexual scenes from Adult Time, Devil’s Films and Evil Angel -- as example, all on this site, without having to join Adult Time/Devil’s Films and Evil Angel. It also does seem to focus on the best scenes from their sites. It has the Adult Time produced series Transfixed on it as well as Trans Fluid. I don’t know what the regular price is. I joined it through an offer on Adult Time and it was only $9.95 with downloads. That’s a good price for this high quality content that can be downloaded.
The updates come fast with 14 in July. Quality is always an issue with transsexual sites. Not here. All 248 scenes have these download options: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. I don’t think I have been a member of a transsexual site with nearly 250 scenes all with 1080p and 4K download options. The picture sets are a little underwhelming in resolution at 1920x1280, but these are legitimate photo sets with as many as 500 photos in each. The first 100 or more of the photos are of the transsexual model, posing and showing her body off in clothes or lingerie. I have noticed some of the photo sets only have 50-75 photos in each.
The sex is going to need mutliple explanations. There are gangbangs with 3-4 males with 2-3 transsexuals. There are scenes with transsexuals with men one on one. And there are scenes with transsexuals with women. These are of special interest. It’s very rare -- in my experience, to see “known” female pornstars with transsexuals. One of the newest scenes is of one of the few pornstars I recognize by name, Kenzie Reeves with a transsexual. That does add some interest for me. It looks like transsexual porn is becoming more mainstream and accepted.
There is a disappointment I don’t think is fair to list as a con. There is only 1 solo scene. Which is my favorite niche in transsexual porn. These are instead full-on hardcore sex scenes with transsexuals involved. The site has a lot of appeal for those curious about transsexuals. Most transsexual sites have one theme and stick to it: Male with transsexual, female with transsexual, and group scenes just aren’t that common in the transsexual genre. This site gives you all three.
It is all done on a professional site that is easy to use and has a relatively large selection of scenes. The site does have categories and you can use that filter down to your interest. I didn’t mention the categories as a pro or con. They are not correct. There are 248 scenes, but according to the categories there are only 8 “female fucks trans” and you will see the error they have made, there are 28 scenes of “trans fucks female”. They also only list 14 “trans fucks trans” and 45 “male fucks trans”. That’s less than 100 scenes. Who are they fucking in the other 150+ scenes?
It’s easy enough to just scroll through the scenes without using the categories. I will keep the score a little lower than it probably deserves. I did not realize this site uses scenes from other Gamma sites and the botched categories need to be fixed. It’s still worth joining if you’re curious about the different forms of transsexual porn. |
|
08-09-21 03:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
90
|
Tricky Spa
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site that lives up to its name, it’s up to the viewer whether that’s a pro or not.
103 scenes, but quality may top quantity in this case.
They stick with trickiness in length of scenes, some are 50 minutes, others are barely 20, some have stories, others don’t.
Really attractive models (some of the guys too), there are 114 models including males. Also does a good job on the “creepy, older guy” casting.
All videos have 7 download formats including 720p and 1080p, but no 4K. Photo sets are also included and downloadable, they look like screen captures to me. |
| Cons: |
If you join thinking this is another massage site, you are going to be partially disappointed. Or if you’re expecting scenes in a spa or even anything related to a spa.
Their update schedule is tricky too. No updates in 2021, none in 2020, 1 in 2019, 2 in 2018 and the other 101 came between 2015-2017. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site oddly appealed to me. It’s part of a message network and the first 50 or so scenes followed the same formulaic “massage scene” style. The room was the same in all those scenes. The scenes were short (most under 20 minutes) and it was just another massage site. I am going to take a guess that someone said “this is just another massage site” and maybe a producer got replaced. The last 50 or so scenes could be anything. Some are in a bedroom, the actors and actresses seem to try and keep with the spa/massage theme, almost in a sarcastic way like Abella Danger throwing a cup of water on a guy. These scenes have stories and are often 40-50 minutes long. I feel like those scenes should be a message to all porn sites. Why not just let the actor and actress (a few have more than one female) just go with the flow instead of following a set formula? I am impressed by how many of those 50 newest scenes end with the guy cumming on the woman’s body instead of holding his cum for the cameraman to get a closeup of the woman’s about to be splatted face.
Even though the updates have been sporadic and most are from a few years ago they do still offer downloads up to 1080p on all of the videos. The picture sets, I’m not a photo set expert by any stretch of the imagination, but the photos look like screen captures to me and they are the same resolution as the videos. I don’t think you can have any optimism about new scenes, but these newer scenes on the site make it look like they just stick scenes on here that don’t fit on their other themed sites. Maybe they will find some more new scenes. I do believe the actors and actresses play a big part in my enjoyment of the newer scenes. I don’t really like naming an actor in what will be seen as a negative way, but Eric Masterson makes the most perfect, “creepy, older guy” and he may be trying to go for that in his acting. These newer 50 scenes show what decent acting can add to porn.
The first 50 scenes were mostly guy massaging woman, woman notices guy is aroused, massaging turns to sexual touching and then sex. The newer scenes don’t even have massage in them. I still can’t give the site that high of a score. It does seem like it’s a site where someone just decided they were going to completely change the direction of the site and it worked. It’s just there are not any new scenes coming out. Just like I can’t give it a really good score, I can’t give it a bad one either. It is called “Tricky” spa and they just completely changed the theme of the site midway through its life. |
|
08-09-21 03:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
91
|
Give Me Teens
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with a blend of older/younger males with females and females with females.
The site currently has 1,408 scenes, but the updates have stopped despite looking like they were really getting going in March of this year.
Videos and pictures are downloadable for every scene.
Multiple niches are interspersed (interracial, threesomes, stepfamily)
Quality of videos is high with up to 4K on newer scenes
Most of the scenes are longer in length than expected (30 minutes plus) |
| Cons: |
It’s not as much of a problem with the male with female scenes, but it’s hard to tell which is the older female in some of the lesbian scenes.
There are minimal stories and mostly poor acting. The scenes seem older than they are, even the ones released in 2021. |
| Bottom Line: |
The size of the site surprised me. It could be advertised better. I did not realize it’s an older/younger site. The scenes do leave a little to be desired. The stories are needed in this type of scene. Just listing the title as uncle or stepbrother isn’t enough. It’s a combination of those two cons. It feels like if they put a little more time into the production values, they would have a really great site on their hands.
The mixture of niches makes the content interesting with interracial, lesbian, stepfamily, threesomes -- and it’s all under the older/younger genre. There is a good mix of ethnic groups, but it could be better in the interracial scenes. As nearly all are an older black man with a younger white woman.
The site has longevity on its side, but there is the downside to that too. The oldest content goes back to 2006. The 2006 scenes to the 2011 scenes have 240p, 480p and the 2009-2010 scenes added 540p, once into 2011, the 720p and 1080p options show up. I do not think I can really complain about that. It still has 10+ years of HD scenes. The picture sets are not a pro or con. They are there, most are very small (30 pictures) and the pictures do look like screencaptures from the video.
The updating schedule is where a problem shows up. From April 2021 to current (August 2021), there have been two updates. The month of March 2021 had 7 updates just in March. The older/younger genre does seem to be sporadic with updates, but this site looks like it has stopped updating for good with the last update being 3 months ago.
The size of the site helps make up for the lack of new updates with 1,408 scenes, which is one of the biggest collections of older/younger porn I have seen. I will add these scenes do not go as extreme in the age differences as a site like Grandpas Fuck Teens. These look more like the older one is 30s to maybe 50s with the younger one looking 18-24. The length of the scenes would normally make me think there would be more story and buildup in the scene, but there’s not much of either.
I do like the site. I just wish the scenes were put together with a little more thought. Some of the scenes are dangerously close to making me feel like I’m just watching any other genre or niche -- nearing the generic feeling level. I still believe it’s a good site for those who enjoy the older/younger genre and would recommend it to those who do. |
|
08-09-21 03:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
92
|
No Way Am I Gay
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I found I have access to with a membership to Finishes the Job. It is a solo male masturbation site.
Despite being an old site this is not a common niche (solo men) and there are close to 50 videos of what I may regret saying -- masculine, straight men masturbating (even more rare, than just male solo masturbation)
The scenes are not long and the quality is not high. You can download all the scenes very quickly.
The quality of the videos isn’t very good in numbers (resolution), but I believe the bitrate for this resolution makes the videos good enough -- barely.
There are pictures, but no way to download them.
No frills navigation, 4 scenes per page, scroll, download, scroll, download.
Quite attractive men for a solo masturbation site. I believe some of these guys have gone on to bigger careers in porn. |
| Cons: |
Each guy’s scene lists his dick size and that’s me shaking my head no. Inflation is a real concern when it comes to money, but these numbers are no way right. One guy is listed as 8” long, 4” wide. He looks maybe average size. Maybe the 4” wide is full-girth? Which would be hard to believe for an 8” long dick. Since that wouldn’t be very round at all.
The pictures would be interesting to download and look at, but no downloads. |
| Bottom Line: |
I had to talk myself into reviewing this site. I was not planning on it until I tested out the different options. Each scene has 12 or more “parts” to download. Those are listed as “midband” which tells how old the site is. It also has a 3 part “broadband” version. Continuing my scrolling there is a full version of the video in midband and broadband. That, to me, justifies a review and me downloading all the scenes.
The broadband version of the full scenes is 480p with 1600 bitrate which makes the videos okay in quality, similar to a tube site. The midband version is 336p. Solo men is the one genre of porn I don’t expect or even want a story. I also don’t want it to last for 20+ minutes. These scenes have no story and most are 10-12 minutes per scene making the file sizes -- when combined with the 480p resolution -- under 200 MB. The site worked very well. The scenes downloaded fast -- almost as fast as I could get the next one started. I know this review won’t interest most of the Porn User members, but do think that’s why a review of a site like this is important. It’s a throw-in site with the Finishes the Job Network which I enjoyed. That makes this site the icing on the cake. The biggest complaint I have with solo men sites is it’s usually easy to tell the scenes are made for gay men. That could be from the effeminate personality of the male that’s masturbating or the male model showing his butthole, playing with his butthole and that does detract for a straight female. These guys may be gay, but they do a very good job of making me believe they are straight men who are masculine. I can count the number of solo male sites that have masculine men on them on my two hands. It’s just not common. This site isn’t that big with 48 videos, but that’s 48 masculine solo men scenes I won’t find on most solo male sites.
The scenes are basic in setup. The guy sits down and masturbates. Scene over. In a lot of ways, I feel like that adds to the masculinity of the male models on the site. These guys act and look like they are just masturbating to finish. Which makes for a highly attractive visual for women that enjoys seeing a man masturbate. Hopefully, some studio will realize the potential in a site like this and give this type of porn another try. |
|
08-09-21 03:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
93
|
Finishes The Job
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One really great site (Mano Job) and two okay sites.
The network’s navigation is not conducive for counting models. It’s also not easy to count all the scenes. I am getting these numbers: Mano Job has 771 scenes, The Dick Suckers has 192 scenes and Mr. POV has 275 scenes.
The model list works well, where each model is listed with all of her scenes across the 3 sites. It just doesn’t have a way to view all the scenes together across the 3 sites. You have to filter down to the specific site or specific model.
This will be mentioned in the cons too. Most of the scenes I have watched or downloaded have 1080p and there is a filter for 1080p, but as other reviewers have noted there is recycling and when you use the 1080p filter, it gives you results across all 3 sites. This may be the most difficult site to review.
The scenes are enjoyable if you’re into handjobs and pretty and cute models teasing a man, sometimes adding a blowjob and sometimes more. |
| Cons: |
The navigation is getting a lot of mentions. It works well as long as you are trying to find what they want you to find. The tags give you results from all 3 sites. But you can’t view all the scenes from all 3 sites without using the tags.
No dates on updates and based on numbers from previous reviews there’s not only less scenes, there are some new 4K scenes added, which means they have removed even more scenes to recycle.
Finding any kind of consistency. There’s just not any. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has been recommended to me by multiple PU members. I did not list this in pros, but I was able to also sign into the site No Way Am I Gay and there are a couple of other sites listed under their company’s name that you can also sign into, Chelci Fox is one too. I am not including those in this review. The Finishes the Job site shows 3 sites and those other sites look like they haven’t been updated in at least a decade even though I do like the No Way Am I Gay site. It is solo men masturbating which is my favorite niche, the video quality is just very poor.
Mano Job is the site I was told to try. It is a handjob site and the female models are mostly attractive. I do think some of them were or are well-known. What makes this handjob stand out is it has tags. Are you picking up on what I’m saying? Most handjob sites only have handjobs and wouldn’t need tags. This site adds butt teases, pussy teases, tit fucking (how they list it), jerk off encouragement which I continue to say is as arousing to women as men. They have taken the handjob genre another step and I do like that. There are even parts where the pussy tease slips and becomes vaginal sex for just a few seconds. The number of scenes is where it’s hard to complain, but also is disappointing. The last review by KayTBuffs listed the Mano Job scenes at close to 900. There are now 771 and according to the site’s page you open to it’s being updated daily. Older reviews even listed higher numbers of scenes. They do have 4K scenes, which do look new or newer, but in this case -- that just means there are even more removed scenes. It still does have over 750 scenes with downloadable videos and photos, making it a very large hand job site. The scenes are at least more than just a handjob too.
The site Mr. POV is okay. It’s a decent sized site and if you like POV-style porn you will probably like this site. I don’t see a big appealing factor in it unless the thinking is it’s for those who get tired of the handjobs. These scenes are hardcore sex scenes.
The Dick Suckers is the smallest of the sites and it’s a lot like Mano Jobs except it’s blowjobs instead of handjobs and there’s very little tease. The models are often on all three sites, especially the popular ones I recognize by name.
This takes us to the biggest problem. It’s a network with no way to see all the scenes in one place. It’s more like a hub page that you select a specific site from. It adds a new twist by offering tags. The tags show content from all three sites. If you select the “cumshot” tag, you will get scenes from all three sites. It seems like this is one of those “networks” where less is more maybe applies. If I select the 1080p tag, it gives me all the scenes from all 3 sites that have 1080p downloads. What if I just want the 1080p scenes from Mano Job? This does make it more noticeable that they are recycling. I tried using the 1080p tag. The results delivered rows of videos from all 3 sites. I then filtered to Mano Job with the 1080p filter set. It opened the results, but the 9th video doesn’t have 1080p. It only lets you use one filter at a time and it shows the recycling. The 4K filter shows a good amount of 4K videos with a total of 169 scenes with 4K downloads -- across the 3 sites, but if you filter to any of those sites, those 4K videos do not show up as the newest updates. There are even scenes with 720p maximum download resolution showing up as newer.
I am being fair with the score on a subjective basis. I am only really interested in the Mano Job content and it was my first time trying the site. Recycling is annoying, but I don’t think it applies on your first subscription. I do believe if you have been a member before you may not be as pleased with it as I am. |
|
08-09-21 03:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
94
|
White Ghetto
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very varied hardcore network with 4,512 scenes
Video quality is very good on 75% of the videos.
They cater to all sexual orientations: lesbian, transsexuals, bisexuals and heterosexuals.
The site is easy and simple to use.
There is the feeling there’s something for everyone here, also very good blend of races and ethnicities. |
| Cons: |
Looks like it stopped updating last year, but it does have 4,512 scenes on it.
No 4K that I have seen, but a large amount of the scenes have 1080p.
With this much variety you’re going to see something you probably don’t want to see like a 63 year old woman being gangbanged. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of those networks that escaped me. Or maybe I escaped it? I love seeing varying content, risky content, and anything that just goes away from the status quo, but there are cons to this like the last con I listed. If you’re not sure what to expect from this network, I’m going to list some of the recent names of the DVDs these scenes are from. I do assume these are from DVDs. The scenes have a name and scene number. We will start with “Trans Brats”, then move on to “I Heart 10 Inch White Boys”. Should that be white cocks or white dicks? The woman loves a 10 inch tall man? Then there’s, “Trans Women Reform School”, “Going Bareback for Tgirls”, “Dreaming of a Trans Monster Cock” which progresses to “Cum Taste My Tgirl Monster Cock”. I then found, “Supermodel Sluts” and “I had Sex with a Black Man”. The always needed, “40 Year Old Size Queens”. Just when I thought we were back to normal porn there’s, “Cuckold Diaries” and I’m sorry for laughing, “White Kong Dong”. As varied as this is, they just couldn’t stop there and delivered “Grandmas who Love to Fuck” and took the overused, but still enjoyable stepfamily porn to all new levels with, “My Stepmom’s Cock”. They even have a DVD series called, “Bushy Beavers”. All of those are just on the first page of what is a 76 page site.
That, to me, is the selling point of this site. If you’re just burnt out on the same type of repetitive porn scene, I can almost guarantee you that’s not going to be a problem on this site, but you will have to be open-minded enough to see grandmas who love to fuck and find out about someone’s stepmom having a cock.
The impressiveness of the variety is easily shown. They have 513 lesbian scenes and some of those are really good. They have 909 transsexual scenes and 3,255 straight scenes. Those straight scenes include anal, threesomes, gangbangs and really every niche you can name.
I don’t know that I would expect high video quality considering these are sourced from DVDs, but at least 75% of the scenes have 140p up to 1080p download options on them. The scenes do have photos and they are downloadable, but some of the sets only have 10 or less photos in them. It is difficult to pin down a certain genre or what to expect. Unless I just say, “hardcore sex”. That does seem to be the theme in nearly every scene. There are some solo transsexual scenes which I was very happy to see.
The site considering how varied, is really easy to use and makes good use of the lesbian, transsexual, straight tags/settings. I have noticed there’s not much story to the scenes even though they are part of DVDs. I thought that could be a reason for the scenes to have a continuing story from scene to scene, but I guess that’s just Vivid that does that. I don’t know how easy or likely it is for me to recommend this site. It’s definitely different in the type of content, but the scenes mostly feel rushed and with no story it defeats the purpose of naming and numbering the scenes. It is worth checking out if you like a very broad mix of niches. |
|
08-09-21 03:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
95
|
Teach Me Fisting
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unchartered waters for me, have never watched or tried fisting.
There are 656 videos for me to find out what the big deal with this genre is about.
Mostly attractive European models.
Video quality is very good except on the older videos. Where it is still an acceptable 540p.
Navigation is simple, but the tags are poorly done. You’re better off scrolling and looking for what you want to see. |
| Cons: |
Site is no longer updating, it does look like based on their last update’s date, it’s possible Covid played a part in the ending of this site which was 15 years old.
It is listed as, "Anal Fisting, Deep Pussy Insertions And Extreme Lesbian Sex", but a lot of the scenes from 2006 - 2014 have men in them. I do believe that hurts this genre. The difference in hand size helps make these scenes easier to watch.
I didn’t get as much a lesbian or sex feeling from the scenes. I thought there would be more action besides the fisting. |
| Bottom Line: |
This isn’t a genre that draws me to it. Especially when I see a fist up the woman’s vagina and another fist up her ass. I don’t know if this site was more of a daredevil site or even sex stunt site, but I don’t feel much sexual tension from the actors and actresses.
The scenes do risk going into redundancy. There are a lot of painful looking situations like the double fist in one orifice and any of the two fists. I’m thinking this is where I’m losing my comfort level. That was on the older scenes. The newer scenes seem to be a completely different site and producer. The newer scenes live up to maybe extreme lesbian sex, but there is more sexuality and sensuality in the scenes. There is kissing, oral sex, and it does make me feel like I felt I would feel about fisting. I don’t see the same from the male/female scenes. I would even call some of the female/female scenes deeply erotic and sensual. The female “fister” doesn’t go for the full fist. It starts with oral, a finger, maybe two, and there is more of a progression which would be natural as the vestibule opens more as arousal sets in. The female/female newer scenes are really some of the best lesbian scenes I have watched. Maybe there is an added feeling that this can’t be faked? The woman being fisted is aroused and experiencing growing arousal. I like it. I am going to have to look more into the sites that only feature women fisting each other.
This site, though large, with 656 scenes, features at least 50% of those scenes with a male involved. If I were to make a gender equivalent comparison it would be the difference in a male enjoying watching a female or even male give another male a blowjob compared to watching the female or male squeezing, maybe even going into cock ball torture. The difference is night and day. The site no longer updates and that is a shame since the newer scenes are all female/female. The video quality on the majority of the scenes has the up to 1080p option for downloads, but the first year or two only have a 540p option. It’s definitely different and even though I do like kinky porn, I guess we all have our boundaries. There are very good picture sets with each scene. Each photo set has over 100 photos and the resolution on the high resolution zipped photos is 5400x3100. I would even like to know if they maybe are considering restarting the site. It looks like they completely overhauled it with the change in male/female to all female, the very good picture sets and found a way to make what looks and even sounds like a harsh sexual act into something sexy and sensual.
I am open to suggestions for other sites with similar all-female fisting content. |
|
08-09-21 03:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
96
|
Massage Parlor
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A welcome change to the formulaic world of massage porn even if the site is dead.
There are 314 scenes each with a downloadable video.
Very little intercourse, but more than a handjob/blowjob. It’s a middle ground of what massage porn usually gives us.
Simple to use site.
Very good video quality, considering the site hasn’t updated in years, makes it an easy site to skip, but you shouldn’t.
Includes photo sets with 100+ pictures and those are downloadable.
Most male and female models are attractive. |
| Cons: |
I’m going to list the no longer updating as a con, but it’s a large site for what looks like a non-standard niche in the massage genre.
There could be more navigation options and tags. |
| Bottom Line: |
The most common massage sites appeal to me. I like the use of oils, the massaging, the hand movements and what I see as erotic foreplay. The problem I have found with most massage sites is that the massages are usually just lead-ins for a handjob/blowjob scene or a standard hardcore scene. I believe it’s one of the embedded into, ingrained if you will, failures of porn over the last 5-10 years. That’s why I appreciate this site and hate that it has stopped updating.
The scenes start off like any massage scene. The masseuse is almost always the female except in a few of the scenes. There are some scenes with more than a masseuse and a customer, working in the angle of “she’s training” to add a second female. The massage doesn’t jump from first touch leads to sex. Some of the scenes have nearly half of the scene focused on the massage. There’s an added playfulness in the scenes with more than one female. As the male customer -- lying face down -- is unaware of the two female masseuses touching each other and taking their clothes off. Where the site excels is only a few of the scenes turn into hardcore sex. Most of the scenes instead of the female masseuse giving the male a handjob or blowjob, shows the masseuse climbing on top of the man in a 69. That is not something I am used to seeing in massage scenes. It, to me, adds a touch of eroticism. If you have problems with fantasizing, I think these scenes help with that. They’re not having noisy sex which usually ruins massage scenes for me. Maybe the 69 is the great mystery solver to stop the overacting and excessive chatter from the models? Both the male and female have their mouths either full or their tongues active. I really like this content and would like to see more of this style of massage porn.
There are 315 scenes so all is not lost. Of those 315 scenes, each has a downloadable video and downloadable photo set. All 315 videos have 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads, even the oldest ones.
With the site’s easy to use navigation, though I will complain that there needs to be better tagging, the site is still one of those that is easy to look over due to it not updating. The attractiveness and decent acting ability of the models make the scenes even more enjoyable. These scenes do work in a little story. It usually happens within the first few minutes of the scenes and has to do with the male customer calling someone, talking about how stressed out they are and how much the massage is needed. It’s not anything too deep, but it is enough. I definitely recommend it for those who want to see a massage scene that is more sexual than a handjob (usually CFNM when in massage), but doesn’t go all the way to hardcore. |
|
08-09-21 03:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
97
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young, cute and sexy lesbian action.
The site updates twice per month and currently has 502 scenes.
The models look to all be professionals or on their way to be professionals, there are 374 total.
Tagging system is useful, but could be more expansive.
Realistic action, but again, these are professional models. Will have a related con.
Video quality is excellent as are the photo sets. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes are a little too professional. You just lose any real belief or even suspended disbelief in the sincerity of the action.
No English subtitles, many of the sites through this company have English subtitles, it takes me back to the too professional feeling, the main form of communication is moaning and there’s not much story. |
| Bottom Line: |
One thing I don’t think anyone can complain about are the looks of the models. Nearly all 374 of these models are very attractive. The action is where you could complain. There’s no doubt the models are giving each other oral sex and kissing, but there is some doubt in maybe 30% of the scenes if we’re just watching professionals going through the motions. I expected a little more with these models being young, but it could be a European difference too.
The story, to me, is very important in lesbian scenes. I want to know if (even if fictional) it’s one’s first time being with a woman or if maybe one has a boyfriend at home, but wants to try a woman. Just give me something to work with.
The technical quality on the site is impressive, but it is important to know something I noticed. The site did not update between 12-18-2015 and 5-4-2018. That’s a 2.5 year gap in updates and I look at that from the technical quality side of it. While they have been producing 1080p since 2010, the 5 years before that are lower quality and 1080p in 2010 isn’t as sharp as 1080p from 2018. That is a note to make to yourself if technical quality is very important to you. The newer videos also have 4K downloads.
The picture sets are quite large with around 125 photos in each and are not screen captures from the videos. These can be downloaded in zip files. Also important if you’re interested in the photos is the newer photo sets are massive in file size (for a photo set). One I downloaded was 1.7GB for the picture set zip. The resolution is 4480x6720. If you like seeing every single inch of the model you can with these pictures.
I just feel like the content could be a little more exciting or even playful. Lesbian scenes don’t seem to have a gray area. Some of the scenes are worth downloading and watching multiple times, while other scenes (even with gorgeous models) are dull and redundant. It didn’t surprise me when I found scenes with still attractive, but not as attractive as the most attractive models on the site -- those scenes were the best. There’s that feeling that some of these models are just there for their looks. It’s still a good site with superior technical quality, especially over the last 3 years. |
|
08-09-21 03:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
98
|
Girls Try Anal
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The title could trick some, this is a lesbian site, the trying anal isn’t with men, but it is what I like about it.
Only 116 scenes, but I found around 80 of those worth downloading. It is not updating.
Explores the way I want to believe most women would want to try anal first, with another woman, a finger, a smallish dildo, not a 9 inch penis.
Video quality is excellent.
Very pretty models including a lot that I do know by name even though I don’t know a lot of models by name.
Also works in some older/younger fetishes. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating. This is a site I really like as my score shows. I would join a site like this for a year just for this content.
Some poor acting, often by the older female models, does take away from the believability of some of the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site does something most porn sites do not do. It takes a concept that is completely believable and makes it look like it’s really happening. I am basing that on the more exploratory sites. This is one of the most believable to me. A few models I knew by name Gia Derza, Nia Nacci, April O’Neil, who I believe is one of the best porn actresses in the lesbian genre. It’s nice to join a site with what I would call a small number of scenes at 116, but realize you downloaded more from those 116 than you did from a site with 4,000 scenes.
The scenes all touch on a curiosity and that curiosity is having their butt penetrated. Fingers, tongues, dildos all get some action. There is more to the scenes than just the woman getting her first anal penetration, not that I believe it really is their first. These are standard lesbian scenes with the guarantee of some anal play. These scenes are long to even very long. One is 75 minutes long. You get a lot of story, a lot of believable (for porn) nervousness, seduction leading to trying the anal and that to me, is doing porn right. It removes the feeling of they’re just doing it for the paycheck.
I could pick 40 or more of these scenes as my favorite scene. And that brings in the part I don’t like, it’s no longer updating. The last update was in 2020. The videos are high quality with all scenes having up to 1080p downloads and a handful having 4K.
I don’t believe porn makes enough exploratory scenes and other sites could benefit from looking into and considering adding exploratory. A lot of sites try it with the stepmom walking in with her stepdaughter trying to give a guy a blowjob or walking in on the stepdaughter trying to finger/masturbate herself. I don’t think those sexual acts are exploratory. Most of us figured out how to masturbate regularly or give a blowjob, or if a guy, how to give a woman oral. Having an older, more experienced woman walking in a younger woman putting a butt plug in her butt for the first time, that’s exploratory. I know many women who have never tried anything anal.
I do think there is a chance for disappointment with the site since I believe some will expect this to be guys with females having first time anal sex. Just from my experience and in talking to women, their first anal with a guy was accidental. Maybe this is too narrow of a niche to appeal to the masses, but it’s the very type of porn I look for and prefer.
The main deduction from the score is that it’s not updating. While I am happy with the scenes they have, this just seems like another wasted opportunity to make porn that gives you a specific niche you rarely see in mainstream porn. Maybe the actresses are just very good at acting and make it more believable. It would be one of my highest rated sites if it was still continuing to update. |
|
07-13-21 09:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
99
|
Web Young
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young, cute, college-aged, pretty lesbian sex.
More hardcore in some scenes than I expected.
Scenes are mostly over 30 minutes, with some nearing one hour, good stories and setup.
There are subtitles, but the scenes I watched are speaking English. They do have other language subtitles too.
Updates twice per month, currently 468 scenes with downloadable videos and downloadable pictures.
The video quality is excellent. All scenes have at least 1080p, with the newer ones having 4K. |
| Cons: |
I listed the more hardcore scenes as a pro, but they do a very good job on the more softer, teasing style scenes. I don’t know if they should just try sticking to one way or the other.
The older scenes include some solo which I’m not really into with these young models. They are not very sensual by themselves. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have a love/hate relationship with the younger female models porn scenes. I have tried multiple teen sites and find myself bored with the solo scenes of these models who don’t even give me the idea they know what they’re even doing. It could be nerves or shyness, but that’s the hate side of it for me. When you put two or three (a lot of these scenes have more than 2 females) females together you at least get a little more sensuality and even aggressiveness from them.
There is some inconsistency from scene to scene. I don’t know if they maybe alternate producers or writers, but some of the scenes are so good they make some of the other scenes seem poor. One of the best scenes I have seen is their newest one. It is two college young women watching a movie and they decide to masturbate together. I think they could have stopped there and the scene would have been great. Instead, it turns into a lesbian scene where the action doesn’t replace the eroticism lost from them masturbating together. I am being critical of a job I wouldn’t want to have. I wouldn’t want to decide this is when you all are going to stop being innocent and become horny nymphos. That scene is stuck in my head. They started out, believably nervous about even masturbating together, then 10 minutes later, they were in full 69 and going at it like pros. I haven’t been in that situation so I don’t know if it would progress that quickly.
The models are very pretty and cute. There’s some ethnic diversity. The production is very good. The stories are believable. The sex is even believable, but not to the level that I would believe these are real lesbians. I’m not even for sure that’s what they want you to believe. The scenes rely more on tease, seduction, which would be more in the realm of bicurious or even straight becoming bicurious.
The video quality is close to as good as I think you can get. They have downloads from 160p up to 1080p on all 468 scenes, with around 40-50 of the scenes having 4K. The most enjoyable part for me -- and it goes back to the young ages, is everything that happens before the pussy licking starts. The kissing, touching, and masturbating together, I like that style with these younger models. There are a few things I haven’t seen much of and those include strap-ons or tribadism. The writers could convince me the young models do not know about tribadism, but it does seem strap-ons with young models would be commonplace.
The site would score higher with more consistency. It jumps from three college young women being silly and playful to two college young women being serious and showing similar to real feelings of love. There’s the inconsistency of being near hardcore in one scene to softcore in the next. That may be subjective to me since it does give some variety, but it does seem like the women I want to see do the hardcore, stick with the softcore and the ones I want to see doing softcore do the more hardcore scenes. That definitely is subjective and should detract from the overall content. It’s a great lesbian site and the stories along with production and high technical quality push it up my list as one of the better lesbian sites. |
|
07-13-21 09:56am
Replies (0)
|
Review
100
|
Curry Creampie
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Rare, at least to me, amateur porn from India. I am from India.
Pretty models wearing traditional Indian clothes and jewelry
It feels like a con, but 158 scenes of authentic amateur porn from India is a lot.
Long scenes with most being over 30 minutes.
Maybe it’s the amateur part, but there’s more kissing, touching, and build-up than most hardcore scenes I’ve watched recently. |
| Cons: |
Not for sure the appeal, even the taboo of these scenes are evident to those not from India.
While these are older scenes, it seems like the video quality should be better than 480p tops.
No pictures, would have been interesting to see more of the clothing, jewelry to see all the taboos being touched on.
I am putting this as a con even though I see it as a pro. There are cumshots, facials, the site is listed as creampie. |
| Bottom Line: |
Finding porn from with real amateurs from India is not easy to do. You can find solo models from India on some of the more glamour sites, but hardcore, in traditional Indian clothing, is what I’m going to call very rare.
This is an older site with no updates, but I hadn’t ever seen it. If you look online you will see how rare any Indian porn is. Finding a site with 158 scenes is not really exciting, but more intriguing. One complaint that really jumps out at me. The women -- possibly being “amateurs” look at the camera way too much. Even in cowgirl position, looking back over their shoulder at the camera. I would even call that distracting from the scenes. I would have liked pictures too. While you can see the women’s clothing and jewelry at the beginning of the scenes they do not stay dressed very long. A lot of the taboo potential has to do with the clothing being on while at least some sexual act is being performed.
I cannot tell you if all these models really are from India. There are several different subcultures of Indian people. A few of the models do look more Romany to me. And we will have a geographical, racial argument discussion on our hands if we get into whether Romany people are Indian -- the Romany are officially considered Aryan-Indo.
The sex itself is quite good. There’s kissing, it’s very inspiring to see an Indian woman grabbing a hard penis while kissing a man. Traditional ways in India put the woman in the extreme submissive role. I do get the feeling most of these women are amateurs and one big reason I say that is they look confused, maybe uncomfortable if they guy pulls out to give them a facial. They do not open their mouths and turn their faces to the side. The men do not look to be Indian, at least not all of them. At least a few of the scenes are even titled, “White Boys and Indians”. This doesn’t really matter either way to me. It does bring another part into question, most of these women have trimmed pubic hair, that’s not really common in India, but I also notice very few tattoos, which is more common in India.
It would help if the women talked. I could tell if they were speaking Hindi. There’s not much talking, but there is a lot of moaning and the sex itself is the strongest part of the site. It’s very believable for porn.
From what I can tell these scenes are taken from DVDs. They are numbered with the same title like, “White Boys and Indians scene #1”. That does mean the quality of the video is not even average in 2021. They give you four download options from 160p to 480p. The 480p is really better watched in a media player that has a “large” mode or one that lets you select the percentage of your monitor’s screen the video fills. I found using PotPlayer, a media player I hadn’t heard of before, works best with the 480p. You can set it to fill 50% or 75% of your screen giving you a bigger resolution than 480p, but not trying to stretch it out to 1080p.
I believe my opinion on this site is probably a little too high since I understand the taboos and know the rarity of finding this many hardcore Indian scenes on one site. I am still limiting my score. I like it more than my score shows. If you are interested in women from India it is definitely worth checking out. If you’re not into women from India, you probably won’t make it beyond the poor resolution quality of the videos. |
|
07-13-21 09:53am
Replies (0)
|
|
