| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
201
|
Stroke That Dick
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Solo, mostly believable straight, masculine, handsome men masturbating.
The guys on here make the cumshot look like they’re painting a masterpiece.
Downloadable photos
Videos are downloadable but are all 480p.
Comes with the very good Next Door Studios Network |
| Cons: |
The site hasn’t been updated in 12 years.
While it’s a con, only 77 scenes, that’s more solo scenes of men than I’ve seen on some men DVD sites.
Probably the most masculine men on the site and they stopped updating it.
Same location for most shoots |
| Bottom Line: |
This was a tough site to review. It’s not easy being a straight woman trying to find porn of believably straight men masturbating. You can find them on tube sites and if you join a dating site!
This is probably the closest I’ve seen to what looks like and acts like believable straight men masturbating. There are a few of the guys that don’t seem straight, but it does look like some of these guys are watching porn while masturbating. I can convince myself they’re watching straight porn or a woman masturbating.
I can’t score it high. The video quality is maybe acceptable at 480p, there also hasn’t been an update since 2008. It does – however – make for a good site included with the Next Door Network. Especially since I know more than a few women who join gay sites looking for male masturbation videos. The size of the site with 77 scenes isn’t impressive compared to most porn sites these days, but in male solo porn, 77 scenes is an okay amount.
The pictures are okay too. Though I will say the pictures can change your mind about whether these guys are straight or not. I would recommend avoiding those for any straight women convincing themselves these are straight men.
They do fall into the same repetitious setting that I have noticed on a lot of solo men scenes. There’s been 40-50 guys that came on that couch at least put a cover over it!
When combined with Next Door Network’s “Next Door Male” you will have 650-700 solo men scenes to choose from. The other sites in the network have some solo scenes too, but most are under 15 scenes. This review also will help those females like me that has seen some of these videos on tube sites and wondered how much content the site “Stroke That Dick” has on it. Not a lot and no new updates. At least the videos are downloadable, and the much larger network brings the value up. |
|
05-18-20 10:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
202
|
Next Door Studios
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The Adult Time of gay porn is what I was told about this network. I think it’s owned by the same company that owns Adult Time.
It comes with 17 sites and they are currently offering a free month access to their new site NextDoorTaboo. I didn’t add it as I’m most interested in the solo scenes.
Some of the sites in the network are updating with 4K scenes, most have all the download options Adult Time has with 360p up to 1080p and all the resolutions between those.
Currently advertises 3,599 exclusive videos on the network and 1,513 models.
Has downloadable photo sets, they list them as total photos not total photo sets and have 215,509 photos currently.
Averages a new scene per day. |
| Cons: |
I would have been happier if it were 17 sites of solo men!
The oldest scenes which include a lot of the solo scenes are from 2005 and only have 480p download option
Better use of the tags. I also see this in straight porn too. Why list “masturbation” on a scene that eventually turns into sex? |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this network based on a recommendation from another Porn User member. Overall, I am pleased with it. I recognized some of these guys from other gay sites I have joined. I am hoping gay sites will think about the other market they appeal to and that’s straight women who like to watch men masturbating.
They have 17 sites on the network and I’m going to review a few of those separately since they have more focus on solo men. Compared to the other gay sites or networks I have tried, this one really stands out and above the others. There are seven of the “Next Door” themed sites and seven “solo male” sites including one I am very familiar with – Cody Cummings. It also has one more site called “Stroke that Dick”.
This number surprises me since if it’s true this is by far the most solo men videos I have seen on one site. Using their search and filters it says there are 1,720 solo scenes. This is where I took some points off.
Using just their tags it shows 1,093 solo scenes. That’s still a lot more than I have seen anywhere, but it’s still an inconsistency I would rather not see happening. Even on the 1,093 solo scene results there it a second filter to filter within the results and there’s “Anal Sex (16)” listed. It just doesn’t seem like this should be that hard to say, “There’s one guy in this scene and he masturbates.”
One review I read of this network said the downloads cost extra, but they haven’t been extra for me. Even the 4K downloads come with the membership.
I did find their ads to be annoying too. When you sign in you get one of those upsell pages like a lot of straight porn sites have where it shows 9 or more sites you can add to your membership. In the member’s area, there are ads along the bottom of the screen too, but they’re not too annoying.
This is as close to a gay network that can appeal to straight women as I have found and it’s why I’m giving it the score of 94. See my individual reviews of some of the sites on the network to see which ones have the most solo or best solo scenes. |
|
05-18-20 10:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
203
|
Family Screw
(0)
|
Reply of
Homegirl's Reply
No, I'm not for sure why you would think you know what I liked. I said there were a few scenes that pushed bad taste. I also really got tired of seeing Gunther. If I had to put a number on it, I would say I really liked 4 and liked maybe 10-12 others.
|
04-30-20 10:49am
|
Reply
204
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I don't like the plain, studio ones that are in front of a blank wall, but do like the ones that are surrounded by pretty scenery or even pretty furniture.
|
04-30-20 08:30am
|
Reply
205
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
Homegirl's Reply
It's probably because you seemed to be more interested in the lesbian scenes while I was more interested in the solo scenes.
|
04-30-20 08:27am
|
Reply
206
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thank you, I could see the lower scores more than the higher scores. I didn't join it for the cam shows, but I had noticed several of those high scoring reviews have the Playdate listed as a pro even though you have to pay a lot to interact with the Playdate and the high scoring ones don't mention that.
This site has quite a bit of media coverage. They even list their appearances in magazines and newspapers. They're promoted as a female-friendly porn site. I think if they fixed the split scenes and lowered the price it would have got a better score from me, but who wants to watch a woman masturbate for 12 minutes, then she stops and you have to find the other 12 minute video to watch the rest of her masturbation? The interviews also are standard fare for porn sites. I thought they would ask interesting questions. They ask, "Why did you decide to get in porn?" And some of the interviews are around 20 minutes long.
|
04-30-20 08:26am
|
Reply
207
|
Family Screw
(0)
|
Reply of
Homegirl's Reply
There's a streaming network included. I described the disgusting part in the reply to RearAdmiral, I didn't see your reply until after I replied to his.
I thought my description would give it away. She looks like Marilyn Manson 20 years from now and after a sex change.
|
04-30-20 08:17am
|
Reply
208
|
Family Screw
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The most disgusting part was the woman. She looks 60's or 70's, really might not be, but they have her lipstick around her lips instead of on her lips, a huge nickel sized mole on her cheek, a black eye and I assume they were going for old prostitute. She looks like a meth addict (I see them everyday), maybe weighs 100 pounds with loose, fat hanging off her body and her butt is sunk-in. To make that worse, she has on lingerie with a thong.
The old man Gunther is giving her to his "son" who looks 20. The son very believably looks disgusted and even flips the camera off. The bad taste, at least for me, Gunther is also in gay and bisexual scenes and he's licking his "son's" cum off her butt. I like a lot of the stepfamily porn, but a dad licking his son's cum off a disgusting woman's butt was a little more than I want to see.
They must be reusing scenes. They are now downloadable and the oldest says it was released in 2019. The four newest listed scenes are really good. They all are downloadable in 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p and can be streamed too.
|
04-30-20 08:15am
|
Review
209
|
Family Screw
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Small, but kinky and perverse threesomes to group sex.
With such a small collection you can at least say you liked every scene.
All 24 scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p
Some of these scenes reach new highs or lows in how believable and perverse they are.
I received a promo for it after being a member of Granddadz and Grandparents X. This is similar to those sites and really would like to see them combine them all into one network.
Updating twice per month. |
| Cons: |
I’ve seen some young male porn stars that seem overworked, but there’s a guy on here that I see in scenes all across this company’s sites named Gunther. He looks 60s, maybe 70s. I only list this as a con because he has trouble keeping it up.
I take this type of porn with the belief it’s in humor. At least one scene on this site is nearing disgusting.
There are some scenes that I don’t know who is supposed to be related or married or what they’re even doing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This disgusting scene features Gunther, see con #1 and a much younger male with a much older woman who I would describe as Marilyn Manson, 20 years from now, after a sex change. The subject of the scene even recognizes it, “Nasty present for youngest son”. A lot of these scenes are good. A few of them push the bad taste envelope.
I thought the best scene on the site was the best of any of their older/younger sites, it’s titled, “Luxury Wellness Receptionist” and has a very attractive man with a very pretty woman while Gunther joins in. He’s like a little Leprechaun.
I have had one common problem with their older/younger scenes and that is how short the scenes are. They have one scene here that has 9 people in it and it lasts barely 20 minutes.
The good thing with these sites is the high quality videos. 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The navigation doesn’t have to be that good. Every scene is on one page. I don’t recognize any of the models except Gunther. The main theme here starts with some sort of family connection. One is a family that is going to swinger’s club. I don’t know that I like admitting it, but the attraction for me is in the perverse nature of this niche. And they have such a broad range in looks between the models that it’s hard to imagine it being any less perverse, even without relation.
I’ll give it a decent score for the high quality everything and continuing to make scenes that seem near impossible to talk the younger people into. If they would combine this site with Grandparents X, Granddadz, Grandmams, I think it would be a major hit and at the top the older/younger genre.
Maybe it’s just my mind working in a bad way, but what happens – you know, when Gunther and the older stars kick the bucket? Of course, they can replace them, but he’s in so many of these scenes. The changes I would like to see made is either creating a network out of all their older/younger sites or speeding up the updates. I think if they combined the sites into a network you would be looking at a md-90s score. As it is, with a slow update schedule and a few really good scenes they have a chance to have a good to great site as the new updates come in, but it’s still going to take 3-4 years for them to just reach 100 total scenes.
It’s worth trying if you have tried and liked their other older/young scenes, especially if you get one of the cheaper promos, otherwise, I would wait a while and see what direction they take these sites into. |
|
04-29-20 03:13am
Replies (7)
|
Review
210
|
Ersties
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly amateur models in solo, male/female, lesbian, group scenes.
Some of the women are very attractive. There is more of a natural look going on here.
Bills through Epoch.
Daily updates and good tagging system.
The solo scenes and especially outdoors solo are the best scenes on here for me.
If you like the site a lot, the 3 month deal for $45 is a good deal. |
| Cons: |
If you are hesitant and only join for one month, it's going to set you back $35.
Besides the tagging system, the overall navigation is not user-friendly and is confusing.
The much hyped "playdate" feature is a free cam show until the model decides you have to pay to see more. Kind of like Chaturbate.
I was attracted to the real couples chemistry aspect of their advertising, they have more solo scenes than male/female, lesbian, threesomes and orgies combined.
I'm straight, maybe bi-curious at times and found none of the men attractive.
Scenes are split for no particular reason.
I also don't care for the whimsical, pastel, layout of the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
It seems to be a very polarizing site. A brief thought on that, I do like some of the content. I especially found the model Anya to be very attractive and sensual in her newest scene.
After that, a lot of the problems come from what is a business model I don't appreciate. Besides charging $35 for 1 month, there's the Playdate feature that they heavily advertise. If you go to the model list, the first 3 blocks are upcoming Playdates. These are live so you have to be online when they have it. I was able to make it to a recent one. Each one has the words, "Free Live Show" on it. I signed in to watch and was taken to a screen that said:
There are three types of playdates
#1 Free Playdates:
These playdates are open, varied and influenced by you, the viewer! If you want the opportunity to determine the course of the playdate, then make sure you have some Ersties Coins added to your account!
#2 Ticket Playdates:
These shows will be prepared by the Ersties Models themselves, allowing you a front row seat as the models indulge the naughty exhibitionist side of their kinky personality.
Tickets can be purchased in advance of the show using coins from your membership account.
#3 Private Playdates:
If you enjoy an Ersties Playdate and want to get the model a little more intimately, you can invite them to a private 1-on-1 playdate!
If a model offers 1-on-1 playdates, this will be displayed at the bottom of this page.
The tokens or coins cost anywhere from 90 for $15 to 960 for $150. Isn't that just like any cam show? They also have Ersties Cams.
I do believe that's important to the review since you are not told you will have to buy tokens to interact with these Playdates. I wouldn't be as negative about it if they didn't also have Ersties Cams. It makes Playdates look like it's something different.
The site itself, they do solo porn well, but they do have the scenes cut into parts. These parts are not used to switch outfits or locations. One of the recent scenes, a woman lays on the couch and masturbates. The scene stops, the next part of the scene, she is bent over the chair masturbating right beside the couch she was on. She didn't even put her clothes back on.
There are interviews on every scene and they are a separate video. They don't list the number of interviews (no tag for it), but this is what they do list: 639 solo scenes, 384 lesbian scenes, 59 boy/girl, 26 threesomes, 9 orgies. These numbers are not determinations of how many of those scenes they have since most have multiple parts. For instance: Mona and Vanessa In Action 1, Mona and Vanessa In Action 2. Just like the solo scene described above, these two videos are in the same location. It gets halfway through the full scene and stops, then you have to go find part 2 of it. They do not always release them back to back. For instance: Layla and Mae In Action 1 was released and Layla and Mae In Action 2 had 16 other scenes released between In Layla and Mae In Action 1 and Layla and Mae In Action 2.
A lot of the lesbian scenes are good, but who knows how many parts I'm going to miss when my membership expires? They have a Christmas lesbian anal scene that has 4 parts. It looks like the 3rd part came out about six weeks ago, in March.
I do like that they're exploring more into public scenes. I really enjoyed the Rebecca In Action 1 scene of a pretty model masturbating on a train. They also have a lesbian library scene that I liked a lot.
If they start doing more of these risky scenes, it will at least give me interest in coming back, maybe even for 3 months. I also like their group/orgy scenes. A few other notes I've seen advertised include BDSM. They have 15 BDSM scenes and those are split, making it more like 7 or 8.
The navigation is a problem because they group lesbians together, then list them separate if they have a solo scene. Clicking on the scene does show all their scenes, solo, lesbian, etc, but there's no way to figure out how many models they have since one model could be listed solo, then again in lesbian. The scenes can't be counted since most of them have multiple parts to one scene.
I'm not really into or against "natural" models, but in the tags there are 606 scenes listed with shaved pubic hair, 310 with trimmed pubic hair and 230 listed as hairy.
There's something that just doesn't feel right about their advertising. With that said, the scenes overall are okay and would possibly be very good if they didn't split them. They offer 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads.
The best way to finish this up is my membership is about to expire. They released an interview of Caireen and Mirah, it also has a scene of them showering together and Caireen going down on Mirah, but that's In Action 1. Which means I won't likely have my membership when In Action 2 comes out. It's like watching a soap opera or television series. Maybe a longer membership would be the answer? It's an average site with potential for me. |
|
04-19-20 02:40am
Replies (4)
|
Review
211
|
Bound Men Wanked
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Site within the Submissed network. Femdom, but is not very rough and often has sex in the scenes.
Good quality videos and consistency in the scenes.
Most guys would love to be “humiliated” like this!
Very attractive models both female and male.
Includes 6 other sites that are BDSM themes; I would say it is a little tamer than Kink – but is still good.
Should appeal to both male and female viewers. |
| Cons: |
Like nearly all sites with this broad appeal, it has stopped updating
38 scenes on this site, the network has over 700. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first con is the biggest pro/con to this site. This really seems like a site that should appeal to both males and females. While there is light domination by the females, many of the scenes lead to the woman giving the man the sex she’s keeping from him. There is even some role-reversal with the guy taking more control. Most of the scenes do seem like something you would see on Kink’s network and part of the reason is, Kink has some of these scenes in their cross-advertising. I was expecting more scenes, but I’m learning quality over quantity.
The videos can be downloaded in 480p, 720p and 1080p. You can also download photos.
There’s no real pain or humiliation from the scenes I’ve watched. All scenes are male with female. Both seems to thoroughly enjoy the scenes. Surely there are men that would love to be tied up to a chair while a beautiful woman gives him a handjob?
You also get the added tension of how far the woman will let him go. Some of the women do seem to become so turned on by their role of dominance they give in and that’s something – I think, most BDSM sites don’t have enough of. It’s hard to believe a woman who is half naked with a guy groping her with his tied hands wouldn’t become aroused herself.
The closest the scenes get to humiliation involve a guy in something like a pet metal kennel and a woman leading a nude man around with a chain around his neck. There are scenes with ball gags in the guy’s mouth and even duct tape over the guy’s mouth.
Even though I enjoy the entire network it’s this site that is the enigma. The last update was October 30, 2019. This would be one of my favorite sites if it had more scenes and/or was still updating. The network adds more value and includes the sites: Ball Gagger, Femdum, Hogtied Up, Machine Dom and Sub Amateur. |
|
04-19-20 01:09am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
212
|
Bi Guys Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
The guys on Bi Guys Fuck really don't have the gay vibe, especially the main one that's in many of the scenes, but it also seems like they're very much there for the pay. The main guy, goes at least 30 or half of the scenes, before he lets another guy give him anal. I think if they had more story with it, it would have made that first time more interesting and the ones before it too.
|
04-19-20 12:24am
|
Review
213
|
Bi Guys Fuck
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Site dedicated to bisexual sex, most of the scenes are two bisexual males and one female.
It currently has 71 scenes on it. They update once a week.
Simplistic site design and choices, nice and clean layout.
They use Epoch as their payment processor.
Small collection of tags (18) for navigation, but do seem to cover everything needed.
Models of both sexes are attractive. |
| Cons: |
Nearly every video starts with a 20 second ad for erection pills. The videos also end with a 2-5 minute interview with the models from the scene. Most scenes are only around 20-25 minutes total.
Very little variety in the models, one guy is in almost every scene. There isn't a model list, but most of the models (male and female) and in several of the scenes.
18 of the 71 scenes are from Hot Guys Fuck, not Bi Guys Fuck, some of these are not bisexual scenes, there are also bisexual females with one male scene. These scenes all venture away from the Bi Guys Fuck theme. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bisexual guys with a woman is one of my favorite niches in porn. I saw this one advertised as new on The Best Porn and happy to see it isn't owned by Mind Geek (pay for downloads), I took a chance. Once on the site, I got a nice surprise. They are currently having a 50% off sale on it.
This is niche that is hard to explain the attraction to. I prefer the scenes in this niche that at some point have the woman pull away while the guys have sex and she masturbates while watching. There's a few of those here.
The variety or lack of variety in models would be subjective to the viewer. One guy, looks to be Latino, handsome, very fit, is in nearly all of the scenes. He's even in the dumb advertisement they have at the beginning of most of the scenes. A ray of hope, possibly, the newest scene doesn't have the ad in it.
The scenes do lack much in the way of story which I believe is a weak point of this niche. It is one of the least creative niches and that goes for multiple bisexual sites I've tried. They sit on a bed, someone tells them to start and they're off to the races. I think in my darkest fantasies of this niche, the woman would walk in and catch her boyfriend/husband maybe getting a blowjob from his best guy friend then she would get involved. It could go the other way too. Boyfriend/husband walks in and catches his wife/girlfriend giving his best friend a blowjob.
These type of scenes are hard to find. TBP only listed 21 bisexual sites the last time I checked. You can find them on DVD series on various sites (Evil Angel has some) and the other option is Bi Empire that is now owned by Mind Geek. They require you to pay $15 extra to download.
The only part I thought was kind of cheap was the inclusion of two bisexual females with one man. There are only four of those scenes, but when you only have 71 scenes, it looks like the 71 scenes would at least live up to the site's name.
Of the other 71, the 18 Hot Guys Fuck scenes have a few that have bisexual males in them. Two are one on one male and female scenes. I would say 55 of the scenes have actual bisexual males content in them.
While it is a new site in listing here some of the scenes are dated back to 2015. Each scene has the same options: 240p, 480p, 720p and 1080p.
I wouldn't say I'm disappointed. A lot of the videos I've found in this niche are 480p quality, so they do they at least have much better quality than I'm used to. A faster update schedule would help too. It's an above-average site with high quality videos for those that are into the bisexual male scenes. |
|
04-12-20 11:40pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
214
|
Couples Fantasies
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A near perfect site for me. Couples living out their fantasies with each other.
Touches on nerves and hormones that most porn doesn't ever get close to.
Four downloadable video options, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 1920p.
I would have paid $15 for the 11 scenes on this site and been very happy about it. Instead, you get this site and 19 more.
Very attractive male and female actors.
I have watched each scene multiple times and probably will keep doing so. A site with this type of content being produced regularly would get me to join it on a lifetime membership. |
| Cons: |
Only 11 scenes. I know that's bad and maybe it will make my score look bad, but I have watched these 11 scenes more than the 500 I have on my hard drive.
Doesn't look like they will be updating it anymore, last update was in 2017.
The actors inability to speak English removes most of the bad acting and causes their actions to speak for them. |
| Bottom Line: |
The premise of these scenes is simple. There's a male/female couple and one of them has a fantasy or they both have the fantasy. Since there are only 11 scenes and I know there are people that want porn like this, I'm going to go over a few of them.
My Wife Wants to Squirt
The husband and wife invite in a third woman to teach the wife how to squirt. She starts with fingering the wife with the fully clothed husband watching. As the wife starts having orgasm(s), the husband walks over and pulls his dick out and starts jacking-off. The wife squirts, he cums and some of his cum even hits the woman assisting his wife.
Furtive Fingering By A Stranger
It's the fantasy us women like to say is not real. The shop owner Tiffany Doll is awaiting a package. I believe they are speaking Spanish or Portuguese. There was a man in the shop. Because I don't understand the language, I don't know if he was her husband or boyfriend. After he leaves, the delivery man brings a package and she's clearly attracted to him. They kiss deeply, he pushes her up on a counter, reminding yourself this is supposed to be a business anyone could walk in and he fingers her very hard, she even opens her shirt and bra. This is what makes these scenes different. She never touched his dick. There's no actual sex other than the fingering. It gives the realistic feel to the fantasy. He walks out of the shop like nothing happened.
One more is Turn Her On.
Male/female couple are attracted to a younger woman and they see her masturbating. The husband tells his wife to seduce her. They end up in a wild threesome.
This is the type of content I was first introduced to porn with. Vivid used to have this type of content and still do in the archives. It's the type of content that makes you wonder what you would do, it has a natural -- in the heat of the moment, feel to it.
The rest of the score comes from it being on a very good network with 19 other sites besides it. They seem to explore several areas of fantasies on their sites. I would compare the content to Pretty Dirty and Pure Taboo, it's porn that does more than just physically arouse you.
I will add a lot of the stepfamily type porn also touches on similar nerves and hormones, but I find these more believable since they are saying "this is a committed couple and in the heat of the moment they agreed to do something committed couples usually don't." Maybe one day someone will make more content like this. Until then, I'll hope I don't wear my 11 videos out! |
|
02-17-20 11:02pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
215
|
Stiffia VIP
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large and varied network of 20 sites.
The site navigation is simple to use. It kind of reminds me of how Adult Time works with the sites going down the left margin.
The variance in sites doesn't seem to follow and reasoning, there is a Japanese site, a couple that look like just porn studios, and some that look like original productions (very good ideas on a few).
The models are a good blend of amateurs and pros.
An appreciated promo price through Porn Users, I really joined this network for 1 site, but it has offered more than the 1 site.
Billing processor is Vendo. I find them as easy to use as CCBill and Epoch. |
| Cons: |
The site is a little slow. It doesn't hurt download speeds or streaming speeds, but it loads slowly.
It has an advertisement for Gasm that never goes away. It looks like a pop-up ad and it blocks some of the content.
Some the site is not in English. I can figure out what Fotos are, but had to translate Canais and Porno Gratis, plus several others. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this network just for the site "Couple Fantasies". Despite its small size, I will write a separate review for it with the hopes someone out there will make a site with this type of content.
Several niches are explored on this network. Buttformation is one I liked, it combines exercising, women in tight workout clothes with sex that focuses on the butt, reverse cowgirl, cowgirl and plenty of views from the back of the curvy, athletic women.
Cosplay Babes is a B-level cosplay sites with costumes that look like something I could make. It seems contrived and forced.
Hot Gold is one I really liked. They have everything on it from transsexual orgies to public sex and these are amateurs with many of the women wearing non-obtrusive masks.
Some of the sites can be confusing. They have one called Inflagranti, it says Berlin, but Inflagranti is not a German word. The scenes include women having sex on cars, around cars, in garages then they have some 5 on 1 gangbangs. Maybe Inflagranti is a studio? I found myself wanting to connect the name to the type of content.
They have an uncensored Japanese site called JapanHD that seems authentic Japanese content not just Japanese models. I found some of these to be very erotic like when the blindfold the tiny Japanese models and use sex toys on them.
MMV is a very different site than I am used to. This does appear to be a studio with mature, very mature models and also BBW. There's no cohesiveness to any of this.
The Undercover Lover is interracial revenge type porn where the white woman has sex with the black man and records it for her cheating husband or cheating boyfriend to watch.
There's another Ebony, dark Asian, Latina site called WCP that's pretty good.
The rest of the sites do appear to be studios that are releasing videos that follow a theme or like they are part of a DVD.
The video quality is excellent. They have 480p, 720p, 1080p and 1920p on their newer videos, the older ones do lose the 1920p option, but they have a good backlog of HD videos.
I'm not usually one to join a network. I have 1-3 days max per week to spend more than 20 minutes on a site. The networks are just overwhelming to me and this one is too. I focused mostly on the Hot Gold and Couple Fantasies content. I did also download some of the Buttformation scenes.
This is one of the better networks I have tried. The slowdown is annoying. It just seems like the site has too much to try to load and that "Announcing Gasm" ad has to go away. There is no way to close it.
I like it better than than the American networks I've tried, except for Kink. When you have a language barrier as many of these scenes do you have to express the content with creativity and they do it well.
The site Couple Fantasies made this join worth the price. I don't know if I can get a good, full review of just the 11 scenes from it, but I think I can since I see it as very unique porn.
I would definitely recommend this network to those that haven't tried it. |
|
02-17-20 10:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
216
|
Ladies Fuck Gents
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Women using dildos on men in more of a dominant way or as a way to get him what he wants from her.
152 scenes make it look to be another site that’s recycling, the 2015 TBP review lists over 200 scenes. It’s still a rare niche.
Decent but inconsistent video quality, I guess these are maybe from DVDs?
Includes photo sets that are downloadable.
CCBill is the billing processor. |
| Cons: |
The same problem I had on another site from this network. The newer videos are lower resolution than the older videos and there seems to be videos missing based on past TBP counts.
Have noticed at least 3 scenes here that’s on another of their pegging sites.
Keeps logging me out and requiring my to login with a username and password they generated which is a mixture of letters of numbers that I have no way of remembering. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my preferred sub-niche of the pegging niche. Not all, but the majority of the scenes are based around the man wanting to touch or have sex with the much more attractive female model. She turns it into a dominant situation where she will let him touch her, have a little sex with her – if, he lets her use a dildo on his ass.
These scenes as a whole look newer than the other pegging scenes on this network. The female models are more attractive, and some may even be porn stars. It is still hampered by the lower video quality with many of the scenes, but there are more 720p scenes on this site than any of the network’s other pegging sites.
These “couples” don’t look like couples. It looks more like a man and woman on a date, he’s overwhelmed by how much more attractive she is than him and is even more surprised when they go in his house or her house. She teases a little then whips out the dildo. Kink’s Divine Bitches is the mistress of this niche. But the scenes here are pretty good. They are not long which is something I’ve noticed with this network. You will rarely see a video over 15 minutes.
These scenes almost all feature the woman eventually getting fully nude and “allowing” the man to give her oral and to touch or suck her boobs. I think if you’re into this niche it’s a very good alternative to Divine Bitches and is one of the better sites I’ve found on the Ferro Network. There is the recycling part, but the scenes are new to me. The photo sets are a good bonus. You have short videos that even in 720p are rarely over 300MB and my collection of women sticking dildos in men continues to grow! I don’t think the cons here would stop a person from joining it. The niche itself does that. Those into this niche will look over the cons. |
|
02-02-20 10:10am
Replies (0)
|
Review
217
|
Strapon Power
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pure femdom strap-on action with women dominating men.
Only 60 scenes, but this is the rarest sub-niche of the pegging niche.
About half of the videos have 720p
More photo sets than videos, maybe the guys asked the videos to be removed? This network also has a site called Strap-On Sissies that is very similar. I think they moved some of the videos from here to it.
CCBill is the reliable biller. |
| Cons: |
I don’t think most men would enjoy this style of porn at all.
Should just be mixed with Strap-On Sissies, a nearly identical site on the network.
Updates seem to be recycled older scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Have you ever watched some hulking man in porn manhandle a little teen woman and force his dick up her ass while she screams? This is the payback! It’s not as hardcore or harsh as some I’ve seen, but what you have here are female models that stick 10 inch dildos up men’s asses, with more than a few of the scenes being the man lying on his back with his butt up in the air as the woman drives the dildo up his ass.
I typically don’t care for this sub-niche of pegging, but because they’re not as harsh here as I have seen, it’s really not bad. Usually in this sub-niche the woman will do nothing for the man and won’t let him touch her. She usually won’t even give him a reason to think he’s going to get anything except the abuse she hands out. There’s a little more allowing the men to touch the women here. Not much in the way of letting him get off until she tells him he can.
One of the most common themes on this site is the woman making the man dress up like a woman and she pelts him with “bitch” and yanks his wig. Being truthful even if it makes me look mean and bad, it’s kind of funny. I keep waiting on the woman to rip his wig off after forcing him to put it on.
This is not for everyone. It might not even be for hardly anyone, unless you can take a sense of humor into it. It’s clear these men could stop the woman and most of these women are quite attractive. Some of the women even look very uncomfortable in their newfound role of dominance. Some even look like they feel bad for the guy. They should record after the scene videos. I am sure most of these women apologized to the guys. Recycling aside, it’s very rare niche content I wouldn’t have found anywhere else. Sometimes I think this type of narrow niche porn is a welcome change to the common scenes we see on other sites. I will add this part for those into this sub-niche of pegging, their site Strap-on Sissies has over 125 scenes and it’s the exact sub-niche of Strap-On Power. And those come in the same network so if this is up your alley, they have close to 200 scenes of the female dominating the man and even making him dress up like a woman. |
|
02-02-20 10:04am
Replies (1)
|
Review
218
|
Anal Angels
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very pretty and young models having anal sex.
213 scenes, uneven updating schedule, sometimes 2 per month, sometimes 1 per month.
Excellent video quality and streaming interface, all videos are downloadable too as are photo sets.
Vendo for the biller.
No download limits that I have ran into.
Navigation works well. |
| Cons: |
These scenes – even with anal – are not that hardcore.
One I usually won’t mention as a female, but the guys on this site are not very attractive.
I think the language barrier causes some problems since these are scenes that look like they need a plot but can’t do so since the models aren’t English speakers. |
| Bottom Line: |
I run into sites like these more than I should. I usually don’t stereotype or have preconceived notions, but my thinking was this site would be at least medium hardcore. I thought that since it has anal in the title. It feels unfair to say this, but a lot of the guys on this site seem very young, inexperienced and even effeminate. Kind of like they are gothic or emo guys. That was a big turn-off for me.
The scenes, as I’m finding with these Russian sites, follow a very strict formula and there’s little to no dialogue I can understand. I speak and write English, four dialects of Hindi, but no Russian!
The quality is very good. All 213 scenes have at least 720p with the majority having 1080p and the newer ones having 4K. There are no download limits, you can also download the photos for each scene.
The female models are very pretty. I just really feel like either there’s a language barrier taking away from these scenes or they just make the same scene with different people from scene to scene. There’s a heavy formulaic feeling, the videos are not very long 20-25 minutes on most. I think I had too high of expectations coming into this site.
I am sure there are some that would like it. A lack of story, dialogue, really a lack of any personality from either the male or female and you end up with what it probably looked like the first time I had sex. Most of these female models would probably be better off in solo scenes. They're not showing much arousal other than seeing a naked guy with a hard dick. |
|
02-02-20 09:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
219
|
Strapon Tales
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Narrow niche content of women using dildos on men.
124 scenes, they seem to be recycling these. It’s still a high number for a limited niche.
Uses CCBill
Downloadable videos and screencaps.
This niche has two or maybe three different styles to it. This one leans towards the role-reversal side.
Easy to navigate as a whole. |
| Cons: |
I was told when a site has scenes that are showing up as their newest scenes and they are only 480p, but they have scenes from 3-4 years ago that are 720p, they are recycling and that’s what this site has. The newest update is listed as 2/1/2020 and it’s 480p.
Poor downloading options, most videos only have one resolution to download.
Screencap downloads are small in resolution and in quantity of photos (less than 30). |
| Bottom Line: |
This niche is done best by Kink’s Divine Bitches. I was told to check this network out (Ferro) and that it has multiple pegging sites (women using dildos on men). This one falls under the sub-niche of role-reversal style. The couples seem to be in regular gender roles, kissing, groping each other, then the woman comes up with the idea of using a dildo on the guy. She doesn’t pressure him or dominate him. He goes along with it and it looks like a loving couple just exploring their sexuality with each other. I will review a couple of their other ones that do the other styles.
I have two reasons to think they are recycling. Newer videos have lower resolutions than older videos and the TBP 2015 review listed over 170 scenes on this site. There are only 124 scenes on it now in 2020. My guess is they’ve moved some of the scenes to their other pegging sites or possibly are recycling from site to site.
I know that’s a major con, but it is a very rare niche and for someone into it, it’s better than nothing. The best video quality I have seen on here is 720p and have seen more 480p. This sub-niche is my least favorite style of pegging. It’s like two loving people having dildo up the man’s ass sex. It doesn’t mesh well to me. I feel like if a married couple was into that it would be great for them but doubt, they would go around telling everyone.
The positive for me is it’s still an underrepresented niche and besides the lower video quality, the scenes are mostly 20 minutes or shorter. Most of these scenes are only in the 200MB file size. You can build a collection of these very quickly. I would rate the couples as “okay” attractive. It does lend to the feeling that maybe these are real couples. I scored it a little higher than I probably should since I do like the niche and the ease of use of the site. |
|
02-02-20 09:56am
Replies (0)
|
Review
220
|
Old N Young
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Focus on older men with young women. In some scenes much older men. There are some realistic grandfather/granddaughter pairings.
Each scene has a video and picture set, both are downloadable.
One third of the scenes have up to 4K videos.
Vendo is the billing processor.
Videos average 30 minutes.
Has 128 scenes and is currently updating once a month. |
| Cons: |
Could use more updates.
The site has content back to 2007, there are full years with 0 updates, and it causes inconsistency in the video quality.
Same content as the site Old Goes Young |
| Bottom Line: |
Old-N-Young continues my exploration of the older/younger niche. This site has some scenes that I would rank as high as any older/younger scenes I have seen. A couple of these “old” guys seem to really turn the much younger women on. Some of the other scenes are not as good and you get the idea the model is just collecting a check.
The one man that looks like Santa Claus is the one they need to keep filming with. Some of the prettiest and hottest female models on the site are in scenes with him and they really are into him. There’s another man – I see no names listed for the men – with white hair and bald on top that is very sensual in the scenes, kissing, touching and these younger women don’t seem to be used to it so it’s very arousing to them.
The con I noticed most was the difference in video quality. On July 15, 2017, the site updated for the first time since October 16, 2015. All videos from July 15, 2017 to current have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p and a mobile version. On November 9, 2014, the site updated for the first time since April 18, 2009! The videos between November 9, 2014 to October 16, 2015 have 1080p, 720p, 540p and a mobile version. There are 52 scenes between November 9, 2014 and current. The other 76 scenes are from 2009 and before. These 76 scenes vary in quality. Some have 720p, some top out at 540p, but that is something I see as a con for most people. I also believe that makes only 1 update per month a con since the newer scenes have very high video quality.
The action is usually good, the filming is good, it is formulaic and possibly that’s due to the age of the men? I would still recommend it for those interested in this niche. The exception to my recommendation is if you've been a member of Old Goes Young. There might be 3-4 scenes on here that it doesn't have, but everything else is the same exact content. |
|
02-02-20 09:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
221
|
Exxxtra Small
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cute, petite models, most look barely legal.
310 current scenes.
Downloads for videos and photo zips are available. Each scene has both.
One new scene per week.
Biller is Epoch.
Videos average 30 minutes each. |
| Cons: |
Is close to cookie cutter gonzo porn. The only unique feature is the size and cuteness of the models.
Not enough threesomes or more. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has some of the cutest, youngest looking models available. The clothing choices also makes them look and seem younger with skirt rompers, some pigtails and this is all accentuated by most of the males being tall and with large penises.
The scenes could have more story to them, but it seems like the whole site is just based on these small models trying to take on a bigger guy. The site has been around long enough to have 310 scenes. The videos are excellent quality and can be downloaded or streamed. The downloads top out at 1080p. The videos are crisp and clear, but they are large files on the 1080p ones. If you’re strapped for hard drive space you could always download the 720p, 576p or 480p versions. The 1080p ones can be as large as 3-4GB.
The models are the main attraction. Most of them are pros, but they are newer to the business or were newer when they filmed their scenes here. A good example of how they use the male model to make the female look smaller is a scene with Michael Swayze with Amber Summers. Michael Swayze is listed as 6’5”, Amber Summers is 5’1”. I just wish they would add a little more to it than the obvious size difference. A few scenes are more creative including one with the tiny woman hiding on top of a refrigerator, tucked under cabinets.
There is good diversity in the models, but we are talking about diversity in an age group/generation where mixed race is nearly the majority. A few scenes are called interracial, but the male and female both look white to me.
It’s a very good site if you like seeing smaller women having sex. And don’t mind the outfits they show up in being cliché like Girl Scouts, cheerleaders and plaid skirts with argyle socks. |
|
01-27-20 08:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
222
|
Teen Pies
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comical twist on creampie porn
Currently has 151 scenes including video and photos.
Very pretty models, very bad acting, it makes for a good mix here.
Cute outfits on most of the females, stockings, plenty of panty views and even knee high socks.
Bills through Epoch.
Videos have some story and are generally longer than most porn videos averaging 40-45 minutes each. |
| Cons: |
After 151 scenes of it the novelty starts to wear off. Almost all scenes are based around the premise that the guy will NOT cum inside her, so you have the shocked model face when he does.
This is a strange con for me, the outfits and silliness of some of these scenes reminds me of Scooby Doo.
Only two updates per month. |
| Bottom Line: |
The Scooby Doo con is the first time I ever thought that. It reminds me of if Shaggy was having sex with Velma and Scooby walked in. That’s not always a bad thing. The scenes are genuinely funny, sexy and won’t bother most people with the redundancy of the scenes almost all ending the same way.
The quality here is excellent. The videos all have 1080p as their top option for downloads. They have 3 smaller options as well. The photo sets are downloadable as are screencaps, but the photos are better in my opinion.
The models are very pretty and I’m sure they’re pros, but I don’t recognize a lot of them. The stories are going to require you to use your imagination. The two most common themes are older (30s, maybe 40s) man with a teen woman and he gets so excited during the sex he forgets to pull out or he pulls out at the last second. The other is the one requiring imagination as the men are supposed to be teens too and it’s supposed to be like first time sex for both the male and female with the male not being experienced enough to pull out when he cums.
It’s nothing groundbreaking, but they do give you a good, even if unbelievable, story that adds time to the scenes and gives time for teasing. |
|
01-27-20 08:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
223
|
She's New
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The 295 models here are supposed to be new to porn.
There are 262 scenes.
Downloadable videos, photos and screencaps.
Biller is Epoch
Videos often are in the hour long range, some are less, even as short as 30 minutes.
Very attractive, young models.
No clear update schedule, but they do update it. So far in January they only have 1 update, in December they had 5, in November they had 1. It at least has a decent sized archive of videos to hold you over for new releases. |
| Cons: |
I think the basis of the site might be a con. It says Only First Timers on each scene, maybe it means it’s their first-time filming with them? I have seen several of the models before.
There’s not much story or even purpose other than it’s supposed to be the models first scene. It’s very formulaic. The sex isn’t bad, and the attractiveness of the models makes the story less important. It’s kind of like watching casting porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site’s popularity has to be because of the looks of the models. They’re all comfortably in the 18-22 range, most are thin, but there are a few bustier ones. The finger in the mouth, “I’m innocent” look is common here. The models are more likely to catch your eye than the plots. Most of the scenes start like a casting type scene. The model talks and answers questions for about 7-12 minutes, she then strips and teases for 5-8 minutes, then the sex starts, and it becomes very formulaic from there. I’m not familiar with some of these models, but there are at least half of them that I have seen on other sites.
The download options are easy to use, and all scenes have 1080p, 720p, 576p, 480p and mobile options. You can download the photo sets and if you like, you can download the screenshots too.
There’s come credit due on the interview portions of the videos. The models do a good job of playing innocent, excited, anxious and often give quick upskirts or upshort views. They have playful attitudes towards the questions, and I found myself enjoying these interviews as much as the formulaic sex.
Beyond that, I didn’t like this site as much as I thought I would. Maybe I’m just burning out on the casting style sites? It’s definitely not the fault of the models. There are some really cute and really pretty models here. It’s just a style a porn I think we’ve been overloaded with. How many more models are going to be shocked to see an 8” dick? |
|
01-27-20 08:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
224
|
Innocent High
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the premier schoolgirl sites.
Bills through Epoch.
They have 468 scenes, but the updates have slowed greatly.
Each scene has a video, photo set and screencaps, all can be downloaded.
Newer scenes are using variations on the traditional schoolgirl outfit and those are some of the best on the site.
Good site for those into fetishes, besides the outfits.Nearly all scenes depict an older man (teacher or tutor) with a young woman. There also is light to mild spanking in most scenes.
Almost all of the scenes have a short story to start (late for class, didn’t do homework, was caught cheating on a test). |
| Cons: |
Since April 2019 there have been only 5 updates. They are averaging about 1 update per 2 months.
They could have more lesbian scenes to cut back on the monotony of older male, younger female in every scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
Innocent High’s oldest scenes shows it started out as strictly a schoolgirl site with the models in the older videos all wearing the same outfit based on the fictional “Innocent High”. The newer scenes still have the schoolgirl outfits in most scenes, but they are no longer branded with the Innocent High logo on the uniforms like the old ones. This is an improvement. Other changes in the newer scenes include older female teachers having sex with younger male students. They also have started leaning on the home tutoring and home testing to give the scenes a different setting than just the same classroom they used in the earliest scenes.
The archive of content here helps offset the slow update schedule with 468 scenes you’re more likely to get bored with the content than run out of content. This site has been around a long time. The earliest scenes go back to 2005. Those scenes have a top video resolution of 576p. By 2011 they started adding 720p and 1080p resolution videos.
You basically have a handful of scenarios here: Student (male or female) is late for class, didn’t turn in homework, said a “bad” word in class and the teacher makes them stay after class as punishment. The spanking here is as much playful as it is serious though the lightest skin models do show the handprints on their butts. The newer scenes are more reminiscent of stepfamily porn even though there are no stepfamily scenes. The student goes to the teacher or tutor’s house or the teacher goes to the student’s house for extra credit and they sneakily have sex in the bedroom with the door closed or in the living room before the student’s parents come home. It does get redundant at times, but the girls are cute, the outfits are too, and the scenes are long. There’s more teasing early in these scenes than a lot of porn has in it.
This is a niche that seems to have lost its popularity in American porn, but if you’re a schoolgirl fan you’ll likely be pleased with this site. |
|
01-27-20 08:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
225
|
Tricky Old Teacher
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Old and young niche plus teacher and student niche.
There are 237 scenes. Each has a video and downloadable photos.
Includes 30 other sites with several having the old and young niche.
Newest videos include the option to download in 4K.
Streaming player works above average.
Network is easy to use and each site is even easier to use with some faults.
Mostly average to cute looking models. |
| Cons: |
It looks like there is a way to search by each sites models, but it doesn't work when I do it. It just shows all the models for all their sites.
It looks like they update once a month.
Few of these sites are that strong by themselves, but as a whole the network is pretty good.
Video quality can be inconsistent. |
| Bottom Line: |
My moods towards porn change often. I was looking for old and young porn, a more common theme in real sex in my home country. I saw several sites on this network that have the old and young theme. I think if you like that niche joining this network is a good choice. They have at least 4 old and young sites on the network. In my experience, a site with 250+ scenes is doing pretty good.
The theme here doesn't always work out how I would have preferred. I like the in classroom scenes, but a lot of these are older tutor goes to younger students house to help them with their homework and they have sex. Some scenes are outdoors too. The sexual parts are as good as any of the older with younger niche scenes I've seen. There's not much story or dialogue. The girls seem to be as much if not more into the scenes than the men are. Maybe that's part of the niche? The men seem surprised the young, cute models are attracted to them.
One of the newest scenes has a 4K option, 1080p, 720, 480p and 360p options as well. If you go back 4 pages into the updates, 8 pages total, you will start finding obscure resolutions like 468p and 286p and those are the best options for the second half of the content. It looks like this site has been around a long time and they just update very slowly.
The content is good for the niche. The men are as energetic as they can be. Some of the men are not in that "really old" group. They look more like 40's, maybe 50's. Some of the others look 60's and 70's. The female models look 18-24, most are slim, small built and are very poor actresses!
The amount of content between this site and the other older/younger sites on the network make it a good buy in my opinion. |
|
01-13-20 10:14pm
Replies (0)
|
|
