| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
176
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Varied network that draws from being the darker side of 21 Sextury
Currently has 4,491 scenes available across its 15 sites
Large collection of older/younger content with over 1,500 scenes between 3 sites.
All videos are downloadable and come with downloadable photo sets.
Covers multiple fetishes including pissing, speculum, fisting, femdom, transsexuals and even has some amateur content.
Newer videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p and down to 180p resolutions available. |
| Cons: |
They have a very broad selection of models on this network. On their site Lusty Grandmas, there are some that look 40-45, and some that look 70-75. They aren't kidding about the extreme part.
Most of the models are professionals and you do get the "too professional" feel from some of the scenes, especially the fisting ones.
Slow download speeds on older videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have an interest in the older/younger niche and reviewed several older/younger sites awhile back. I developed a recent interest in fisting and thought this network does a good job of covering multiple fetish niches.
The old/young sites are Lusty Grandmas, Grandpas Fuck Teens and Old Young Lesbian Love. These sites by themselves are worth a join. Most of the older/younger sites I joined had 200-300 scenes. These 3 sites have over 1,500. I usually prefer older woman with younger men, but believe the Grandpas Fuck Teens is the best of those three. You also can get your femdom/bondage/rough sex fix in with Mighty Mistress, Dominated Girls and Mandy is Kinky. The Zoliboy site has a combination of softcore and hardcore. Teach Me Fisting is a good, not great, fisting site that has other women helping the model learning to fist.
The quality is very good. Some of these sites haven't been updated for years, but most of the videos have a minimum of 720p and the newer ones have the 160p to 4K options. You have to go back to the oldest content to find videos with only 480p and 540p download options. In the cons I listed the download speeds on the older files. I was downloading a scene from Speculum Plays (2007) and it was only downloading at 1/6 my normal downloading speed. I haven't noticed it on all the sites in the network, but Speculum Plays does download slowly.
There is also a pissing and blowjob site rolled into one. There is an amateur site which looks out of place. The transsexual site looks like scenes taken from old DVDs.
I get the feeling this network was a bigger deal years ago. To me it felt more like I joined for the 3 older/younger sites and got a strange hodgepodge of sites thrown in. Speculum Plays is a better site than I expected since I am usually not into the gynecology sites. It has more of a the doctor is going to finger and masturbate the pretty girls instead of really showing much for a gynecology student to learn from.
This is a large network with over 1,200 models and close to 4,500 scenes. The older/younger sites they have are worth a 90. The other sites didn't interest as much. The fisting site is maybe too hectic and tries too hard to be extreme. The dom content is like a Kink-light. It's worth a join for those that are into older/younger, but I'm not for sure I could recommend it to anyone else unless they just joined for a month. |
|
09-08-20 10:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
177
|
WTF Pass
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Surprisingly large and diverse network.
There are 11 sites included in the network.
By their count there are 2,676 scenes.
Some unique and strange porn which is why I guess it's named WTF Pass.
The newer scenes on the network have 720p and 1080p quality downloads.
Some of this content is too strange to make up or pass up. |
| Cons: |
No scenes have dates on them and there's no reason to believe any of it is updating.
Strange isn't always a good thing.
Feels like a cheap version of major networks takes on reality porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
This was not as bad as I was expecting. I found interest in several sites and also felt like some of the sites are just blatant cheap ripoffs of bigger, mainstream sites. Below are the sites that come with the network and their number of scenes:
College Fuck Parties 434 scenes, Pickup Fuck 218 scenes, Private Sex Tapes 393 scenes, Hard Fuck Girls 51 scenes, Porn Weekends 85 scenes, Dolls Porn 408 scenes, Public Sex Adventures 45 scenes, Panda Fuck 32 scenes, HD Massage Porn 167 scenes, The Art Porn 663 scenes and Meet Suck and Fuck 180 scenes.
If you are like me the first one that really caught your eye was Panda Fuck. This is a site featuring a stuffed Panda Bear that I believe a man is in. The women masturbate and have "sex" with the panda's foot long dildo or cucumber. The Art Porn looks a lot like Sex Art and X-Art, it also has scenes that are named in ways to make me believe they have updated somewhat recently like, "Quarantined With Hot Girlfriend".
What does impress me about the network is this looks to be all-amateur. In some ways, it reminds me of Teen Mega World or maybe Porn Pros. Some of the scenes do feel generic, but I do believe the amateur aspect helps in that regard. They have a lot of outdoor, exhibitionism, voyeurism scenes too.
A few things to make note of the scene counts on some of the sites is lower than it says. College Fuck Parties which is a good site has older scenes that are split into 4-6 parts. There is a model list and it lists them having almost 800 models. My guessing that it's amateur is based on me not recognizing any of the models. It does look like the prettiest models are on their site The Art Porn. The age of the models is a lot of 18-20 year olds and I haven't seen one over 24.
I do think it's an okay join especially if you like outdoor, orgies and public porn. Nothing really stands out and that's the same feeling I had about Teen Mega World. I would not be surprised if this content is related to TMW. I was debating trying it since I do like orgies. When I was signing up, I noticed a nice surprise, the price was only $8. That probably helped me make the decision to give it a try. There is definitely better porn out there, but if you're looking for something with a sense of humor and even foolishness, this network does a good job on those parts. |
|
09-08-20 10:50pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
178
|
Bang.com
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The biggest, most overwhelming porn site I have ever joined.
132,436 scenes and they update with at least 12 scenes per day.
18,144 models, that's a small city.
Their original series scenes are quite good.
45,107 of the scenes are available in HD quality and 1,613 of the scenes are available in 4K.
Somehow this monstrosity of a site has good navigation.
No problems using the biller that others have experienced according to the comments here. |
| Cons: |
Maybe I should quit my job? This is like a mountain of porn came crashing down on my computer.
The size of this site very well could be its biggest con. I am using the category filter to at least find some content I want, but the pages and pages of scenes is just frustrating. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was looking for a site with a little bit of everything. A little bit. This site has a whole lot of everything. Some of the less popular niches I like have these totals:
395 bisexual scenes which is more than 90% of the bisexual standalone sites I have joined. They make that and my point even clearer when they show me they also have a bi-sexual category with 14 more scenes.
1,285 "shemale" scenes. What I do like about their search engine is you can click shemale, it brings up the 1,285 scenes. You can then click solo and it searches within the 1,285 shemale scenes and shows 44 of them are solo.
Niches that are usually very uncommon are common on this site. The Voyeur category brings up 1,419 scenes. They even have 1,787 compilation scenes.
While I did find a lot of scenes to download in the above specified favorite categories, it's their Original series that sets them apart for me. They have 12 of these Original series. These scenes have high production value, but it looks like they have stopped releasing many of them. It could be due to the Pandemic, but it's still disappointing.
The video quality does vary the further back you go, but most of what I have watched is at worst 480p and are decent quality. I am not as much into the technical parts. Most of my interest porn started with Vivid, bisexual scenes and males masturbating. Most of those are in 480p quality or standard definition.
The problem with the older scenes is I am thinking these are just from DVDs and a lot of them are not interesting. One of my main reasons for joining this site was the content I used to get from Tainster. This site has 36 DVDs of Party Hardcore content. These DVDs are broken into parts which was the only disappointing part about finding them here. The Party Hardcore site also breaks the performances into multiple parts which can be difficult to watch as they change camera angles from scene to scene. When combined with all the bisexual content and transsexual solo content, it makes this site a very good value for me. I just wouldn't want to be a member trying to find something without knowing what you're looking for. The navigation is handled by just clicking boxes. It works well, but the categories are often vague and unless you know exactly what to type into the search box, like "Party Hardcore", I believe you could spend a month just looking for the content you want. I don't see this as a site I will return much, but it was good for finding some specific content I was looking for. |
|
09-08-20 10:48pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
179
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Six excellent PureCFNM sites are included in the subscription.
Great video quality and photosets. Downloadable with no limits.
Uses CCBill for easy billing and cancellation.
The videos can be downloaded in a trailer, 480p, 720p and 1080p. 4K is not an option.
Has some of the best porn for women to enjoy.
Logging into the network gets you access to every site very easily.
Still updating despite the pandemic. August had 15 new scenes. |
| Cons: |
No easy search ability. It is adequate though.
Some of the sites in the network have degradation of men. I am not a fan of that. |
| Bottom Line: |
The amount of porn aimed at women is rather limited and it is probably the most untapped market in porn. However, this network is about as good as it gets. I like that many newer scenes are more interactive between the women and the men. I like that the sites are evolving to where the women start off clothed then gradually go to partially or fully nude. That has not always been the case for CFNM sites, and in the past that was true of this one also. The women are a mix of both amateurs and pros and I think for this type of porn that works well. The amateurs look like someone you could know, nicely dressed, but with a British accent. The amateurs look very real and there reactions are very believable and genuine. In many scenes they are wearing sexy pantyhose and I have a hose fetish. They don’t have any Indian women and there sure are plenty in the UK. I volunteer to be the first.
Pure CFNM is the main site here. It has been around a long time, so some of the oldest videos are SD quality. There are 760 scenes and have a little bit of story to them.
Amateur CFNM is not completely amateur as I recognized a handful of pornstars. The amateurs are not perfect looking models, but they have a genuine charm that I like.166 scenes.
Lady Voyeurs has a great future as it has a theme that is rare and quite entertaining. Men masturbate for the women to get pleasure from watching. The scenes just get better and better with each update. The women have become more actively involved and show enthusiasm as well as some skin. 286 scenes.
CFNM Games is a small site that was fun, but sometimes quite unbelievable. There are only 24 scenes, but I feel they are very much hit and miss.
Girls Abuse Guys and Hey Little Dick have degradation of men as a theme. Sometimes they are a bit over the top, between name calling and spitting there is not much to like in my mind. I like pegging, but not abusively. GAG has 91 scenes and HLD has 134.
There have been updates even during the pandemic and August had 15. The totals for the network are 1461 scenes and 672 models. I highly recommend the network as I downloaded more than half of those scenes. |
|
09-08-20 10:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
180
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Overwhelmingly large lesbian site that has content from as far back as 2003.
Over 1,000 models.
1,816 scenes with new updates being posted every 3 days.
Each scene includes downloadable photos and videos.
Advanced search allows the user to filter multiple tags.
Very attractive models, could possibly be a con.
Good price for all the content you get access to. |
| Cons: |
There is a professional feel to everything. The models are nearly all Europeans and the porn feels that way.
The advanced search will likely confuse just as many people as help them.
Consistency is not always a good trait. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my first time joining this site. While I am open to lesbian content, it is not my favorite and I have to be in the mood for it. This site is a good example of that. I won't deny the quality of the content or the beauty of the models, but some of the content feels forced, scripted and the newer scenes do not offer much variety. The professional feeling is a con to me. Everything looks like a porn set. This automatically loses me a little bit. You can even use the advanced search to see the actions used in each scene go in phases. It's like they pick up on what's popular and use it in every scene until it's no longer popular then they find something new to add.
That is more my subjective opinion. I have been using lesbian sites like Girls Out West which is on the other end of the spectrum. Some of the scenes here are outstanding. It does seem to matter who the models are. Which offers some inconsistency, but the production is highly consistent. I would like to see more action letting the women work within the scene without so much direction.
From an objective view there isn't much wrong. They list 1,000 models, but it looks like more than that to me as one page says, "Our latest 1,000 models". They have a little of everything too. See a short list of what all different actions they have in their scenes.
374 scenes with 69.
298 scenes with at least 3 girls.
57 scenes with fisting.
95 scenes with tribbing (I don't agree with their number on that one, it seems much higher)
74 scenes with strap-on dildos.
The video quality is very good, they have 1080p downloads available on some scenes from 2004 and 2005. Starting in 2006-07, all videos have 1080p and for the last year or two they added 4K. Many attractive models, high quality video downloads, photos for the photo lovers and still updating during the Covid-19 pandemic. I think the only real faults with it are if you're into amateur action, scenes that make you believe the actresses are into it the lesbian sex, or if you want any kind of story or setup, you may be a little disappointed. The site does do an excellent job of capturing the action on camera (professional) and showcases the models' bodies. |
|
09-08-20 10:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
181
|
Bi Empire
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
In my opinion, the best bisexual site, but it’s not without faults
There are 255 scenes. Up until 3 weeks ago, it was updating weekly, but has not been updated over the last 3 weeks.
The models include some mainstream porn models which is not normal for bisexual sites. There are 214 models total (male and female).
Videos are downloadable (extra cost) in 480p, 720p and 1080p. This is also not normal since most bisexual scenes are from 2013 or before. The ones here started in 2016.
Nearly all the models of both sexes are very attractive.
Professional production compared to more amateurish production on other bisexual sites. |
| Cons: |
You have to pay extra for downloads. The price for the site is $9.95. To add downloads, it’s $14.95 more. They are worth it if you are into bisexual.
Probiller is difficult to cancel.
Even with good production the niche limits itself to get everyone involved. |
| Bottom Line: |
I do not like joining sites from the company that owns this one, but my bisexual collection needed some higher quality scenes and if you are looking for higher quality bisexual scenes you will not find many bisexual sites that match this one.
One of the first things you will notice are the known mainstream models. Lady Dee, Sarah Key, Rae Lil Black, Cindy Shine and Jennifer Mendez to name a few. Most bisexual sites have performers that are either amateurs or ones you have not heard of. The other option with bisexual sites is they do not even give you the names. I do believe seeing mainstream actresses filming bisexual scenes with two men shows the niche is growing in popularity.
You will also notice when you try to download a scene you receive the pop-up that says you do not have access to downloads. The membership with downloads added costs $25. It is worth that if you can download all 255 scenes in a month. I do not understand why they do not offer the downloads at sign-up.
The male models on this site makes it my personal favorite. I do think we are seeing male professional models turning to the way female professional models did a long time ago – gay for pay. Very few of the males are effeminate. Most of them even look like they are a dominant male in a male/female scene. Which is where the professional production helps this site. The most common lead-in for bisexual sites is the boyfriend/girlfriend talking and the girlfriend telling the boyfriend there’s a guy she knows who is willing to give him a blowjob or anal sex if he will let the guy have sex with her. The scenes here mostly start out with a male and female having sex. Another male enters the scene and it usually will turn into what looks like a regular, straight male/female/male threesome. That is when they change the script and the new guy in the scene pulls the guys dick out of the woman and starts sucking it.
The video quality is also a big step up from most bisexual sites. I have a large collection of bisexual scenes from other sites. It seems like from 2007-2012, the niche was gaining some popularity, but fell off. Most bisexual sites these days have the content recorded from 2007-2012. The videos here started being published in 2016. You have the 720p and 1080p download options.
The site is easy to use. It has clear menus, a model list and only one ad.
I did not have as much problems with canceling through Probiller as I have in the past. I followed another member’s advice and just sent an email to them. They replied back with a special offer for one of their other sites and cancellation confirmation.
If you go into this site looking at it as a premium bisexual site and knowing you are going to pay $25 for the site with downloads, it is really not a bad deal. Hopefully, someone will make a new bisexual site in the future and will start It out using the same principles they use on Biempire. |
|
08-12-20 12:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
182
|
Bisexuals Hardcore
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the best collections of bisexual DVD content.
Includes access to the All Gay Sites Pass and access to the All Porn Sites Pass. There are over 100 straight, gay, transsexual, bisexual sites on these two networks.
Not as attractive overall as the models on Biempire, but this site would also appeal to gay men, whereas I do not know if Biempire would.
A total of 175 scenes, I do not think it updates and would not expect it to start updating. These are scenes from bisexual DVDs from the 2007-2012 years. The video quality confirms that.
Good job considering it’s amateur production. I believe these are European models, attractive though some of the guys are very effeminate. I believe that devalues the bisexual experience. |
| Cons: |
This is probably the most common con in bisexual porn – the content is old, at least by porn and technology years. The video quality is at the very best, average.
A lot of the most overused position in bisexual porn, one guy in one guy’s ass, while that guy is in the girl’s vagina. It’s not good for watching (too much movement) and it looks like everyone in it is out of rhythm.
They have a few other bisexual sites on this network with minimal content. It seems like they would just put it all on this site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a standalone site on one of the most interesting networks I have ever joined. You receive full access to the network you joined through – for me, that was All Gay Sites Pass and it includes full access to a straight network called All Sites Pass. There are over 100 sites on these networks. Most of what I can see it looks like these were all once standalone sites but stopped updating and are now all thrown together on these two networks.
Bisexuals Hardcore was my main interest in joining. There are scenes on here I am familiar with, there is one Asian woman, maybe a Filipina, who is in 3 or 4 scenes and I recognize her from her excellent body and effort in the scenes.
A few PU members have contacted me and asked about my interest in bisexual porn and what makes it different. I think bisexual porn is mainly marketed towards gay men and straight women. Most women like the fantasy of a threesome with two guys. This is what I like seeing in bisexual porn. At least one of the males has to be convincing as a straight male. Biempire does a good job of convincing the view both guys are straight. The woman (for female viewers) becomes the focus. Is she sexy enough, seductive enough to get the convincing straight male to do sexual things with the other male just to get a chance to have sex with her? I would think for gay male viewers, the turn-on would be believing the gay male actor was able to seduce the straight male.
Bisexual porn is not going to be the highest quality porn you have ever seen. Biempire might change that in the distant future, but most bisexual porn is about sex, lust and orgasms. I do believe my cultural difference from American viewers helps me with bisexual porn. Most men from India would not admit it, but there is a trending popularity in cuckold and bisexual relationships in India.
Though this site uses the overused position described in the cons they also do some more interesting positions. I think one of the most arousing positions in a male/female/female bisexual scene is the male having doggystyle sex with the female, while the other female lays under the female and licks the dick and vagina. The female receiving the doggystyle is doing a 69 with the woman under her. They do that here with a male on the bottom. The Filipina I mentioned earlier does it in all of her scenes.
The two main problems here are common for bisexual sites. The video quality is hit or miss. There are 720p scenes. They are just blended in. The rest of the scenes top out at 480p. They have 5-6 video formats. I do not know why. I do not think you need a .mov, .wmv and .mp4 in 240p. It makes that part of the site (downloading) a little cluttered and even confusing.
It still is a good site for those that like bisexual porn. One of the better ones, really. Nearly all scenes have at least one man who convinces me he is straight. Considering all the bonus content you receive with this site, it’s worth trying out. I once heard that about bisexual sex too! |
|
08-12-20 12:56am
Replies (0)
|
Review
183
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Highly recommended site for female viewers and males too.
Great video quality and photosets. Downloadable with no limits.
280 scenes with a new update each week.
Includes access to the excellent Pure CFNM network.
Newer scenes have the females being more involved. Is more like Jerk Off Encouragement now.
CCBill for easy billing and cancellation. |
| Cons: |
Older scenes were trying too hard to complete the Lady Voyeurs title with the females being in the distance or background.
Not for sure I agree with the females staying clothed. They do not in all scenes and the scenes with nude females are the best to me. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been a member of Pure CFNM in the past. I thought the overall content of the network was excellent, but my favorite content was on the Pure CFNM site. Lady Voyeurs would seem like the perfect site for me. One of my favorite parts of porn is watching the man masturbate. That is what Lady Voyeurs is. I do not know if their producers limited how much the females could do, but it was rare to see a female even look more than interested in the nude male masturbating. The newer scenes have the females teasing the male, some even taking all their clothes off and touching themselves while they watch.
It is probably the most untapped market in porn. Even with the improvements to Lady Voyeurs they could make subtle changes to it to improve it. I even think they could let the female give the guy a few strokes to get him going and maybe even let her offer more if he performs well. It does not have to go into degradation or humiliation. I even prefer the word, encouragement. Like she so excited she cannot stop herself from wanting to see him cum.
The scenes are short and it makes me wonder if that is because some of the females are better at the teasing and showing more to the guy. I do not know how exciting or arousing it would be for a guy to know a woman in the dark was watching him masturbate compared to one in the light, taking her clothes off and asking for his cum. It seems like that would work better. I would estimate the average video is only 10-12 minutes. The women’s reaction to the cum is an arousal point. Those reactions seem very genuine.
The videos can be downloaded in a trailer, 480p, 720p and 1080p. I do not think trailers are very useful for this site since you have to watch the whole scene to see how involved the female becomes.
The network as a whole has 1,457 scenes and I would not be surprised if a fan of CFNM downloaded at least half of those scenes. I am scoring Lady Voyeurs for their noticeable improvement and believe the network itself is at least a 95. |
|
08-12-20 12:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
184
|
Brutal Castings
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with Fetish Network of I believe 52 sites.
Some variety ethnically but all the models are very young.
I normally would avoid a site with the word "brutal" in the title, but these scenes are not brutal at all. Some are even arousing and fun to watch.
I knew a lot of the 59 models which is a surprise for me and like the ones I know of. |
| Cons: |
No longer updating and really I don't think the network is updating.
Nearly every model has tattoos. I personally like tattoos, but know it is more often seen as a negative by porn fans.
Too predictable as each scene is identical except for the models.
Prechecked cross sell |
| Bottom Line: |
Brutal Castings has 59 videos that has not updated since April 2017. It was active for about two years and it was very controversial.
In the documentary “Hot Girls Wanted” porn star Ava Taylor states that her scene on this site turned her off from continuing her career. The fact is that she did scenes after the one on this site and later admitted that the reason she left porn had nothing to do with this scene.
After that controversy the site changed the format somewhat. At the end of each scene, they had an interview with the porn star. They talked about how much fun it was and that they were happy they did the scenes. You see smiling and sometimes laughing. How sincere this was is unknowable. Maybe it was required by the site as a condition in order to get paid. This is fairly common on sites that have BDSM as a theme.
What this boils down to is a site with forceful, but BDSM that is light by porn standards. If you have seen Kink sites, you could even call this one tame in comparison. The basic premise is that a very young aspiring, but inexperienced wannabe glamour model shows up at a modeling agency. She is coaxed into going to topless with panties or just bra and panties. They are verbally pressured to go nude, they resist and are lightly tied up, binding their wrists together with a rope. The abuse is not really much and is primarily verbal.
Ava Taylor looked a bit spaced out in her scene, but not shocked. I think she was not into this sexually and was just earning a paycheck. None of the women seem sincerely surprised or shocked either.
I did not see any anal and every scene is oral by one partner on the other and then vaginal. There is nothing over the top sexually.
Besides Ava Taylor, they also have Sadie Pop, Piper Perri and Gina Valentina. These are all beautiful professionals that can be counted on for top notch scenes. However, one scene caught my eye with star Ally Berry. I have never seen her before but she is my new favorite as she is the perfect combination of looks and believable enthusiasm. I am fairly sure all the models are Americans.
By itself this site does not have enough to get my recommendation. However there are many other interesting sites that are included as the network has 52 sites. |
|
08-12-20 12:51am
Replies (1)
|
Review
185
|
Holed
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Many beautiful American models. I found them all to be outstanding.
Segpay is the biller.
168 updates with a trailer and a photoset for each video
Fast downloads and easy navigation.
Nice production values, enjoyable scenes.
All videos available for download up to 4K |
| Cons: |
Prechecked cross sale where you don’t expect it. There is a drop down box for yes or no.
I wish these sites would either start naming the filenames what the scene is or hire someone to come organize these scenes for me. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t usually look for anal focused sites, but it was interesting anyway. The site is very professional in its production values as well as the selection of models.
There are many beautiful American models, 122 to be precise. Some I did not know, but many were big names in the industry. As I am sure people know by now, I am a collector of some favorite models and I found some videos here that I have never seen before. The ultimate pro Jynx Maze has three scenes that were new to me. A few others were quite good starring Kendra Spade and Chloe Amour. I loved Asian May Thai and hope I can find more of her scenes. She has that natural Asian petite look that I find irresistible, and she is a great performer as well. I would have preferred more ethnic variety, but at least there were a few scenes with MILFs for a variety in age. It would be hard for me to recommend the site by itself unless you're a collector. They have a few models I collect and this content is exclusive.
The technical quality is as high as you will find. The oldest video on the site has the typical 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K options and a 720p WMV option as well. I am happy with 720 HD, but some feel a need for the best quality available.
In June and July there were three updates. The older videos are not dated, so I don’t know what is happening here. At the moment there are 168 updates and as many photo sets for each. You do get value for your money, even if it eventually becomes an archive site.
Downloads were very fast and were as fast as my computer can operate. I was able to max out my system at about 80 to 85 percent.
I think they could make it easier by letting you pick your username and password. As it is, you have randomly generated usernames and passwords that you have to keep going back to look them up to enter them. I also would have liked if the file names were all unique. I did not see any reason to have to rename every video download. They also don’t have any scene descriptions, so you are not sure what you will get. At least there is a trailer for each video.
I found many interesting scenes, it's a good site overall. |
|
08-12-20 12:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
186
|
Nanny Spy
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fun, quasi-hidden cam (at beginning) porn.
All scenes have videos and photos to download
Many download options up to 4K
Porn Users has a discount, but I joined through the Porn Pros upgrade packed
40 excellent models |
| Cons: |
There are only 41 videos, but they are all exclusive
Only two updates since the Rabbits review last October.
Filenames make no sense. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nanny Spy is available by itself using a discount through Porn Users. I got an offer to sign up for the upgrade package from Porn Pros, when I joined there back in April.
Nanny Spy is one of those smaller but interesting sites with only 41 videos, so as a single standalone site I cannot recommend it. There is a photo set and a trailer for each. In spite of its small size, I found a lot to like about it.
The scenes appear to be shot in beautiful and expensive homes in the Los Angeles area. I lived there during my younger days, but did not live in homes like these. They have beautiful expensive furniture and such extras like outdoor and indoor jacuzzis. The families hire nannies and check up on them using spy cams.
The nannies are always up to doing something they should not be, like using the house for a cam show, getting caught watching porn or using the sex toys they discover and masturbating. The fun starts as the daddy, the man of the house, catches them and confronts them.
There is an age difference in the pairings. This could have been the focus, but for the most part it is not what you do see. There is concept of a power difference and its consequences. The nannies are willing to do “anything” once they are caught. The nannies seem to like paying a price for their misbehaving and very willingly enjoy the sex.
In the real life Los Angeles I knew, there was a lot more ethnic diversity than you see here. There is one Asian model and no Latinas. The models they have here are some of the best stars in the United States, both in looks and in how professionally they perform. There is nothing fake about them either. They do their scenes well. Riley Reid and Adriana Chechik are great here, but I expect that from them as they are two of the best in the business.
The effort that was put into the videos makes them work. The site though is not so well done. There are no scene descriptions, or tags and the file names are always the same. So you get for example mp4_1080 for every scene that you download in 1080p. If you want to know who or what is in the scene, you have to change all the file names. Another weakness is that the scenes do not show a date and only two have been added since the last Rabbit’s review in October, 2019. I suspect it has stopped updating.
I feel the site would have the potential to be in the 90’s if they had more updates. This is porn, so I am often disappointed when a good concept is left to remain undeveloped. |
|
08-12-20 12:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
187
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An eleven site ladyboy network with I think broad appeal
Over 1,000 models
Over 3,000 videos and newer videos have 4K option
Over 3,000 photo sets with zip downloads
Very good navigation via model search, latest updates or categories. You can also search by site.
Scenes seem genuine, the “straight” males in the scenes seem surprised, but also don’t push the pretty ladyboys away. |
| Cons: |
Very little story other than whatever the specific site’s niche is.
Camerawork could be better at times. Showing someone’s face while they orgasm kind of ruins the point of showing whatever happened before the orgasm. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have always been intrigued by transsexuals and more specifically ladyboys. Being from India, I knew a few ladyboys and there was an unexplainable attraction to them.
Which was one disappointment for me. For some reason, I thought this network had a lot of scenes with ladyboys having sex with women, but it only has 10. It does have nearly 200 solo scenes which returns to my fetish of seeing “men” masturbating. I think that number might be low as I have seen several solo scenes not marked as solo.
I don’t consider myself close to an expert on ladyboys or transsexuals, but my understanding and my eyes tell me a ladyboy is usually of smaller frame, most look to be Asian and most look very feminine. That is why I think the ladyboy niche could have a broader appeal. I know a lot of straight guys would say they’re not interested, but some of these ladyboys might change your view.
From a professional view, I have studied about the men born with the XXY chromosome or the Klinefelter Syndrome. I think it would be interesting if these transsexual and ladyboy sites discussed that more. As some of these “men” are born more dispositioned to be females than males even if they have a dick.
That is what you see a lot of on Ladyboy Gold. A lot of these models would never pass as a male. The solo scenes give us a different perspective of a dick being masturbated since these models are more feminine, you see more hip movement, more what I would call sexual movements and I find it very attractive.
The network is large with over 3,000 videos and 3,000 photo sets. It goes back to 2007. They update 5 days a week and some, not all, of the updates have up to 4K video.
The sites you receive with the network are: Ladyboys Fucked Bareback, LB Girlfriends, Ladyboy Crush, TSRaw, Ladyboy Vice, Ladyboy Dildo, Ladyboy Obsession, Ladyboy Wank, Ladyboy Angel and Ladyboy Glamour with Ladyboy Gold being the hub and main site.
I am most impressed with the passion you see in these scenes. You won’t see models looking bored or just wanting the scene to end. They look like they are very much into the scenes. For the females into cumshots, it’s one of the best parts since the scenes with a male with the ladyboy both cum and I think it also could appeal to bi-curious women since you are going to see boobs, feminine bodies, but with a dick.
I do think it takes longer than a month with this network. I knew zero of these models and find myself a little overwhelmed at times. The scenes I found most interesting were the orgy/gangbangs. I was hoping to see more of those with women included. It would make you wonder if the male was going to get off more with the anal with the ladyboy or the vaginal with the woman. I have really enjoyed this network especially with the easy navigation and no ads. |
|
07-15-20 04:15am
Replies (1)
|
Review
188
|
Grooby Girls
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This has to be the biggest transsexual site.
Over 2,000 models and over 6,000 scenes.
Interesting way of releasing and categorizing scenes: Climax Mondays, Tryout Tuesdays, Post-Op, Hardcore and Model of the Month.
Some of the prettiest transsexuals I have ever seen.
They update 6 days a week.
Scenes with women having sex with the transsexuals. |
| Cons: |
Some of the least attractive transsexual models I have ever seen. I am sure the large number of models goes into this.
The site goes beyond overwhelming. I do not know the word for beyond overwhelming. It does hurt the usage and navigation of the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is supposed to be the best, the biggest and oldest transsexual porn site on the internet. It says it has been around since 1995. The first scene that I noticed led me to join despite a fairly high price. It has Joanna Angel from Burning Angel in a threesome with two transsexuals.
I went to the advanced search since I can’t find any categories. Surprising and a little disappointing, there are only 9 scenes with transsexuals having sex with women and one is the Joanna Angel scene. They made up for that when I searched for solo and they have over 600 solo scenes. Some of these solo scenes are unbelievably good. One has very large boobs that look natural, an 8 inch dick and she cums 3 times without stopping.
In doing a direct comparison to Ladyboy Gold which I also joined and reviewed, the models here – overall, are not as attractive to me as Ladyboy Gold’s models, but that is just a subjective preference.
I do think part of that is because these are transsexuals and not ladyboys. A lot of these models have a more masculine frame and build. It’s not the case with all of the models though. Some of these girls look like teen girls I have seen on solo teen girl sites like Nubiles.
It has only happened a couple of times, but I think should be mentioned. When going to download a file a screen pops up that says they don’t recognize my machine and they have to send an email with a code for me to input. I have used the same computer each time I have been on the site. Their quality is very high starting with a 480p file that goes up to 4K and that’s on all of the newer scenes I have watched. You can download or stream. They also have photo sets you can download of each scene and screencaps that can be downloaded too.
I did find the Post-Op section to be interesting and wonder how many straight males would be into that. They did a good job on the surgery.
The advanced search is expansive, and it works. You can even make multiple selections in it with choices like cock size (small, average, 7.5+) hair color, type of action, so it really shouldn’t be this overwhelming but it is and I think so because there are quite a few of the models I don’t find attractive.
They include a bonus section with content from other transsexual sites. I have never thought this was a good idea since the competitor is probably sending their best content.
I do think I am being a little hard on the attractiveness part and want to explain that. They have so many models, if I picked out the ones, I find attractive, it would probably be a higher number than any other transsexual site.
They also have a full model list which does not help me much since it would take forever to go through 2,000 models. They do seem to do everything right though.
One part I find confusing and maybe it’s a non-issue. When I first heard of Grooby Girls it was on T-Girl Japan. I want to think the content from that site is on this Grooby Girls site since it said Grooby on it, but I’m not for sure it is. When you look at how many site Grooby has, over 40, you have to wonder if that means you have to join each of those sites to get the specific content. This would be a major negative to me since all of their sites are over $30. I do think that is the case. When I use the advanced search, it has three countries listed, the UK, Spain and the United States. I did reduce the score for this. If they can tell me I was wrong in this assumption, I will add some points back. It seems crazy to think you would have to spend over $1,000 just to get all their content.
I can recognize their importance to the transsexual niche, but that’s just too much content spread out across many sites. |
|
07-15-20 04:12am
Replies (2)
|
Review
189
|
Bi Sex Digital
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Look what I accidentally found! The biggest bisexual site I have joined.
279 DVDs.
The DVDs average 3-4 scenes per each one.
Attractive males and pretty females.
A lot of orgies. |
| Cons: |
Look what I wished I hadn’t found. The list of complaints will have to go in the bottom line.
No downloads
The site pages take 3-10 seconds to load.
The streaming player is even slower and is glitchy.
The welcome email told me I have access to other sites. When I tried signing in them there’s no access. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have said in previous reviews of bisexual sites it’s very hard to find good ones. I saw this in a Gamma promo, the price was low (under $10), the amount of content was the most I had seen. Nowhere on the join page or the promo was it mentioned there are no downloads. When I signed up the page glitched with a broken link that said, “Go to member’s area here”. I opened my email account and had two emails from them. Both said Bisexdigital in the subject, but inside the second one it said I have access to Austin Wilde. I went to that site and tried to sign in, it said no account. I went back to the other email which had a direct link to Bisexdigital. The site took forever to open. Once it did, I was able to sign into it and find out all the videos are streaming only.
The streaming player buffers every 3 seconds. The site itself takes up maybe half of my monitor. It looks like it was made in the early days of the internet.
The content looks good, but if I can’t get it to stream without constant buffering and can’t download it, what good is it?
They show having 279 movies. I do not know if they are just counting full DVDs or scenes. The Best Porn review says it has a 200GB daily download limit. The whole site says it has 403GB of videos. That makes the 279 sound like standard definition DVDs at around 1.5GB each.
I do recognize some of these scenes from my collection of bisexual scenes, but there are a lot I don’t have. I don’t know why so many bisexual sites are streaming only. Most of the content is from 8 or more years ago and is 480p in the streaming player.
They have some of the first bisexual DVDs I saw back in 2007. It’s easily the most impressive collection I have seen. With bisexual porn you already know it’s likely to be 480p, so that part is forgivable. I would be willing to pay more to have a download option. That is the main reason I’m not giving it a bad score. The scenes are good. If you’re okay with streaming these scenes are good. Bisexual porn was creative back then. |
|
07-15-20 04:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
190
|
Pantyhose Creep
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of the very large Fetish Network of 52 sites
The site focuses on legs, short skirts and pantyhose
Interesting premise that got my attention
Very attractive models.
Good video quality
Good yearly price with promo
There is a voyeur and exhibitionist feel to the scenes. |
| Cons: |
Questionable business ethics
Isn't updating
Download limits
Small site |
| Bottom Line: |
When I originally reviewed The Fetish Network, I was happy with it, but I'm starting to become less interested in it.
There have been several complaints about this network. I have not had a lot of the common problems others have had. There is a problem with canceling that requires you to email them and there is a download limit.
I joined the network on a year subscription and it is non-recurring. This site was the one that interested me the most on the network. I have a reverse foot fetish and usually any site with pantyhose is set up for reverse foot fetish.
I used the reverse foot fetish term in the past and a few members asked what that means. Reverse foot fetish is when the female gets as much arousal from the foot fetish or more than the male. Pantyhose leads to this since the woman has to slide them off which makes a lot of women feel sexy. The guys in porn seem to always be horny anyway, but to see women who are horny before any sex even starts is -- in my opinion -- very erotic.
You can also find reverse foot fetish on the Jerk-off Instruction sites. I don't know if it is something a female would notice more, but the sheer pantyhose often shows how wet the woman is before the action starts.
This site does that well. The scenes are setup by a "perverted" man filming an unaware young woman. I don't know if this would hurt the fantasy for some, but most of the models don't have panties on under their short skirts. The guy becomes braver. This is shown by him moving closer and closer. Oops, he blew his cover or something else. He talks to the woman about how he would like to photograph her for a photography shoot. This leads to him asking for sex and that leads to the best part.
They deny him, but agree to tease, strip and even masturbate for his camera. That for me is enough to show the reverse foot fetish. She's as aroused as he is by him looking at her feet, thighs and everything her pantyhose shows.
That also shows the downside to this network. There are only 44 scenes on the site and it hasn't updated in years. The network has a similar problem. They have a lot of interesting and well-produced scenes, but I can't tell if anything is updating.
It might also show my very specific niche interests which isn't easy to fulfill.
I am in my 6th month of my membership and the sites that interested me the most, including this one, have not updated during those 6 months.
It was a good promo price back around Christmas and I really can't complain about my overall experience since I haven't had any of the problems others have. It makes me wonder if the year promo doesn't have download limits and non-recurring means I don't have to go through what sounds like a frustrating process.
This site would rate in the 90 range or higher just by itself if they had even 150-200 of these scenes. Be sure to make note of the other comments left on the network's page here. I can't verify the problems, but enough people have had them it's hard to ignore. I won't be rejoining once the year is up since I already have everything I want from the network. |
|
07-14-20 08:54am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
191
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 06-21-20
I also have not received my gift card for the June 17th raffle. It seems like Tom is having to do all the work by himself.
|
07-01-20 06:31am
|
Reply
192
|
Private Classics
(0)
|
Reply of
hardog's Reply
Understood, I wasn't born until the 80's so anything before the 90's doesn't interest me as much. I also didn't know much about the studio except the first porn I watched was from it.
|
07-01-20 06:28am
|
Reply
193
|
Private Classics
(0)
|
Reply of
hardog's Comment
I'm not for sure what "signed talent" means, but Pierre Woodman only produced 48 of the 350 DVDs on here.
|
06-26-20 05:20pm
|
Review
194
|
Chaos Men
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
What I saw as an obscure gay site is now my favorite gay site.
2,395 exclusive videos of I think amateur men.
They have zipped photos, zipped cam caps (screencaps) and animated gifs you can download. Not all scenes have all 3, but those animated gifs in a zip file (usually more than 5) is the first time I have seen that offered and those are good to save on your phone for “lunch breaks” at work.
CCbill is the biller which I have found is rarely the case for gay sites.
Large collection of solo scenes, the men are mostly masculine, and each scene includes pertinent model facts like dick size, cut/uncut.
High quality videos that can be streamed or downloaded.
Was cheaper than I expected, the price I was given was $12.48 for the first month and $19.95 if you let it recur. |
| Cons: |
Some of the videos look like they are self-shot or shot by someone using a phone camera. The quality is fine, but some are filmed vertically so if you watch on a computer monitor or television the video, even at 1080p, only takes up the middle of your screen.
Exclusive and amateur is just based on my limited knowledge of gay porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
I know it might be unexpected for a straight woman to join gay sites, but I have three reasons. Straight sites rarely have a guy masturbating or being masturbated unless handjob or CFNM and two, gay porn does seem to be the only possible way to see solo men.
The third reason and I would call it the biggest reason is being from India most of the men in India spend their entire lives denying masturbation and saying they have never done it. Which also means they will not do it in front of even their girlfriend or wife. These same men will spend their entire lives looking up porn of Desi women that strip or do sexual dances in their traditional clothes. These same men will then say they “just watch” the videos!
I have been in the United States for over 10 years now, speak English fairly clear and have developed fetishes Indian men wouldn’t do, but American men will do.
Chaos Men has solo scenes that are exactly what I look for. I can find transsexual videos that have good solo videos, but what I look for requires another step of at least masculine men being the ones masturbating. My image of a masculine man might not be like others. Hairy chest is good, a beard is very good and his body frame doesn’t really matter unless he’s slimmer than I am. Most of the gay sites I have joined feature a lot of “twinks”. These are slimmer men that look very young. There is not a lot of fantasy there for me. I probably could dominate them. The men on Chaos Men are not all “bears” either, but most are medium to bigger built in frame and it lets me have my fantasy like and older man looking at a pretty 19 year old woman.
It's not perfect. It does not have categories. You have to search for what you are looking for and hope the search box brings it up. This site has 794 solo scenes. The men are mostly that moderate to bigger build, many have beards or at least some facial hair, some are bald, there are tattoos, which I do not see as adding masculinity. Many even have hairy armpits which you rarely see on the twink gay sites. There’s chest hair, some even have back hair, which is not a turn-off for me. I think the difference in cultures shows there. The hairier a man is the more masculine I see him.
And there are 794 of these scenes! I have been happy with sites that had 20 masculine men masturbating.
A complaint that I think some would have is some of these scenes are 15 years old. Those only have a 240p option on downloads.
I was a little worried it was going to be one of those gay sites where they started out with solo guys then stopped filming solo once they upgraded their cameras, but it’s almost the exact opposite. I was so interested in looking at all these guys that I went through their pages finding when they switched to better cameras. I hope that shows my enthusiasm.
The first 20 solo videos only had 240p videos. The next 60 moved up to 360p. Starting there, they added 720p and 1080p. Which means they have over 700 videos of solo men with both 720p and 1080p download options while only having around 80 in the poorer quality. On the newer videos they also offer two versions of 720p, these add the 60 frames per second version, while the other versions are 30 frames per second. The 1080p in the newer versions is only available in 60 frames per second. I am fine with the 30 frames per second since this site is going to do a good job of trying to make me buy another external hard drive as it is! The size difference between the 720p with 30 frames per second is 414MB, the 720p with 60 frames per second is 1.01GB or more than double the size.
The animated gifs is a feature I have never seen on any site. These are not like the ones you can find on Google, these are up to 5 seconds long and there are 8-12 included in a zip so you can watch them in a row and get the best parts without sound and without needing much space on your phone. The pictures are very good quality and show the guy going from clothed and limp to nude and hard. Those can be downloaded in a zip too.
I have joined gay networks, gay standalone sites, looking for something like this, but cannot say any of those sites made me feel like I could with confidence recommend them to straight women, but I can this one. Straight women and most gay men have similar interests when it comes to men. I never thought I would say I felt lucky finding a porn site, but I do. It is as if this is exactly what I have been looking for and finally found it. Having CCBill as the biller is also great. I joined a few other gay sites that had billers I had never heard of. I'm planning on letting it recur at least for a month since it was only $12.48 for the first month. There also is plenty of the male/male and group scenes for gay men to enjoy too. This is easily my favorite of the gay sites I have joined. The quality continues with the filenames including the model’s name. Had to edit 5 times to get below 5,000 characters. |
|
06-17-20 05:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
195
|
Pride Studios
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gay network that is run by the same people as Adult Time. With this many gay sites I have to wonder if they will eventually have a Gay Adult Time or just add all the Gay scenes to Adult Time? This is the second gay network I have reviewed from Gamma.
Nine sites are included and combined they have 4,502 videos.
Videos are downloadable with the subscription I bought, but they do also offer a streaming membership as well, make sure to pay attention when signing up.
This is just an observation: There are more masculine men on this network than other gay networks I have been on. I see the word “bear” a lot and you get the bigger build, hairy (beards, chests) here than on other gay networks.
Currently averaging 4 updates per week.
Plenty of scenes here for straight women to enjoy too. |
| Cons: |
If you have any kind of preconceived notion of what a gay man looks like or acts like, it is probably going to be messed up by this network. A lot of these guys look like big, burly lumberjacks and athletes. I am listing that in cons for the gay men readers who prefer the twinks.
Just an outsider’s opinion, there is not as much to do in gay sex as straight sex. I join gay sites for the solo scenes, but some of these guys in male/male scenes were sexy enough to watch and I just felt like they need to add a woman. That is an idea even. How about a site where a woman masturbates while two men have sex? |
| Bottom Line: |
These are the sites you receive with this network:
Pride Studios
Bearback
Cock Virgins
Circle Jerk Boys
Boyz Party
Dylan Lucas
Extra Big Dicks
High Performance Men
Men Over 30
Being in my 30s, I really do not see a lot of these guys looking like they’re under 30. I am saying that in response to their site “Men Over 30”. Most of these guys look in their 30s to 40s. There is a total of 2,543 different guys. This is a large network. They also offer photos and their count is just over 250,000 total photos. They have some niches here that I had not seen before like Beards and Bulges, Husbands in Lockdown and I think those could interest straight women.
My main interest is the solo videos. This did create a problem. They do not have categories. They have tags so if you find a solo scene you will see the solo tag, BUT you cannot click it. They have 10-20 tags per scene, but none are clickable. This left me with one option and that was to use the search box. I am getting mixed results with that. A few test examples based on their tags:
I searched for “solo”
Eight of the first twelve scenes that came up are solo. Which is not bad, but it does show a weakness when trying to find specific tags/niches.
I searched for “jerking off” which is one of their tags.
The first problem is it doubled every scene so there is Live Life, Scene #02 listed twice in the first 12 results. Of the first 12 results for jerking off, only 3 are solo guys.
It’s going to take some work to find all the solo scenes, but there is a large collection of them that I have already downloaded (100+).
I don’t know if I am just not very knowledgeable about gay porn or sex, but the site Circle Jerk Boys, which I expected to be a group of guys masturbating together really isn’t. It has a few scenes where the guys are masturbating together, but most of those turn into standard sex.
That is really my biggest complaint. Make the content easier to sort and search. This is the first site (gay, straight, transsexual) I have been on that has tags that are not clickable.
You do get very good quality videos. It is similar to Adult Time’s video download options with 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
It looks like for the current situation with the pandemic they are releasing compilation videos and that is okay with me since I didn’t have any of the content. I cannot speak for gay men, but this network does lean more towards the big, athletic, bear type male models than twinks. Some of the most commonly seen tags are “Athletic”, “Beefy”, “Muscular” and “Jock Strap”.
Besides the issue with finding what you are looking for this is a very good network. |
|
06-17-20 05:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
196
|
Private Classics
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Vintage and classic porn DVDs from the 1960s – early 2000s.
Downloadable magazine photo sets from the Private magazines also going back to the 1960s.
The site is laid out well, with selections for movies, models, magazines, 00s, 90s, 80, 70s, 60s, also has a section for black and castings.
Currently have exactly 400 models with some having over 100 scenes each.
Just under 1,900 scenes, unlimited downloads.
Can also search by full DVDs, there are around 300 full DVDs, including the very first porn DVD I watched. |
| Cons: |
I am not for sure how much of a con this is, but the videos have only one download option. Besides that, a lot of these scenes seem very short (some under 5 minutes).
No category search or tags
They have updated, but there are no dates and no way to know how often they update.
The filenames do not have the DVD’s title in them. |
| Bottom Line: |
One of my favorite sites is Vivid. I only watch their “classic” DVDs. The stories are usually at least better than we see in current DVDs and I think the models are more believably into the scenes as in newer porn DVDs. I was recommended this site as similar to Vivid Classics and in some ways, it is, in other ways it is not.
I do like the magazines section. Being from India, I have very little experience with the porn magazines and seeing the photo shoots from those shows how much porn has progressed.
One part I misread was I thought I also received access to private.com, which has their newer scenes on it, but you have to join it separately.
I have not watched a lot of the oldest scenes. I like the 90s and 2000s. They not only have some story and continuity from scene to scene, but also do not feel like current porn. The production does not seem as planned out. When I watch newer DVD scenes it seems like they follow the same exact plan from start to finish in every scene. These scenes sometimes will just have oral or a quick sex scene that leads into the next scene. It is too bad these DVDs cannot be downloaded as one whole part. Considering the scenes are mostly standard definition (480p range), it makes the files small and I would think a full DVD would be under 1GB.
There is a good selection of models. I know of some of them. And even though it seems like some of the scenes have been edited, these are still the only porn DVDs I really like. You can even get a porn history lesson here by watching the DVDs from the different decades. I think I would call it the evolution of the cumshot. The older scenes were mostly body cumshots, then the boobs cumshots and into facials in the newer scenes.
I do not know why these older scenes have a more authentic feel to them, but they do. Maybe they were better actresses?
The site really needs a tag system or categories. You are just handed the site with newest updates and have to decide what looks good without knowing what happens in the scene.
The first DVD I downloaded was Tatiana 1 which was the first porn DVD I ever watched. I thought it was older than the site lists it as 1/1/1998, but it was still fun watching it again.
There are a similar number of classic scenes here as on Vivid’s site, the quality is overall similar to Vivid’s classic scenes and the stories are as well. I think that is the market this site would appeal to. If you are into classic Vivid DVDs, I believe you would like this site. |
|
06-17-20 05:44am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
197
|
Cody Cummings
(0)
|
Reply of
UMBA8's Reply
The Cody Cummings site was the only one in the network that had the bisexual and hetero. The others had some solo guys, but not any with women. I have reviewed a few bisexual sites that were good, but small in size. There are several bisexual sites that aren't listed here that I liked a lot. I could reply with their names if you're interested.
|
06-17-20 04:49am
|
Review
198
|
Sins Life
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
In my opinion, one of the most attractive men in porn, Johnny Sins and his equally as attractive wife Kissa Sins.
I don’t know a lot of porn stars, but the ones on here are very well-known, Adriana Chechik has 7 sets, Veronica Rodriguez has 10, Katrina Jade has 7. The site is very professional.
Rare at least to me, reverse gangbangs and group sex with Johnny taking on 3-5 women at a time in some of the scenes.
Very realistic “diary” feel to the site. Some scenes start with Johnny and Kissa cooking and eating breakfast or one of them turning the camera on as the other one wakes up.
Most of the scenes have 1080p, but some top out at 720p, there is a con that makes that important.
Outdoor scenes, vacations, game-type scenes, very good variety to keep things interesting.
Uses Epoch, watch out for the pre-checked cross sale. |
| Cons: |
I had read there is a 5GB per day download limit, the bad news is, the download limit is still in place, but the good news is it’s now 10GB per day. Most of the 1080p scenes are over 1GB. I have only been downloading the 720p and haven’t hit the limit.
Way too many ads. The ads also look like scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
They say you never forget your first time. The very first porn I saw once I had moved to the United States was Johnny Sins with, I believe, Eva Angelina, there was a motorcycle involved in the scene and he was measuring her ass. I have always liked his scenes since then.
This is the site him and his wife Kissa run. I don’t know if she was a porn star before she met him, but her performances say she was. There is a realistic and even fun side to the site. They seem to really enjoy each other’s company and she’s open to him being with other women. Which I admit, I keep wanting to find one where she is with another man just to see if it brings out a more aggressive, more competitive Johnny.
There are nearly 350 scenes, and these can be what looks like a normal studio porn scene or Johnny using his phone’s camera to show Kissa giving him a blowjob while he’s driving. It is like watching them document their sex life.
I was a little concerned about the download limit since I knew I would want a lot of these scenes. I’m downloading 10-15 scenes per day and not hitting a limit. It says if you hit the download limit it will be reset in 24 hours or you can send them an email. If I download even 10 scenes per day, that would be 300 in a month or nearly the whole site. I don’t really like the scenes that look more like standard porn so I doubt I will hit the limit.
There are 122 models including some I haven’t seen that look like they should be in porn if they’re not. That number includes Johnny and Kissa. It does not look like they are currently releasing any new scenes. I know some sites aren’t or can’t because of Coronavirus, so I won’t count that against them. They did have 3 new scenes in April 2020, but none so far in May 2020.
There’s just a real factor here that you don’t see on most porn sites. One scene might only be 12 minutes, the next will be 47 minutes, it’s like following their sex life.
It's one of the better straight sites I’ve joined lately, and I will mention this here since I don’t know how long the deal is good for or I would have put it in the pros. When I went to sign up they had a special $9.95 per month price and said it would also recur at $9.95. I didn’t use any special promo or anything to get that offer. I just went to the site and it was in the join options. Great site, I hope they keep it going. |
|
05-18-20 10:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
199
|
Cody Cummings
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very handsome, bisexual male who does solo, bisexual, heterosexual and gay scenes.
A total of 314 scenes with 79 being solo, the rest are a blend of hetero, bisexual and gay.
Most scenes are HD (720p or 1080p with smaller resolutions available).
Very pretty girls in the scenes that feature women. It’s rare to see bisexual threesomes with two males and a pretty woman, but the ones here are.
Photo sets can be downloaded.
The tags can be made to just apply to the content on this site so it doesn’t bring up other sites on the network. |
| Cons: |
Seems to be a recurring theme, no longer updating.
The oldest scenes only have 480p download option.
Not much story in the scenes, especially the bisexual ones, it seems like those would be perfect for a story. |
| Bottom Line: |
Cody Cummings is one of the few male porn stars I know by name and have always found him attractive, but I don’t know if he has retired and I’ve just been watching too many tube sites or if he has moved on to other sites. I wouldn’t know if this is true, but this is the biggest solo site I have seen of a male gay/bisexual porn star. Cody is in every scene.
I still think sites like this one help blur the line between what appeals to gay men and straight women. There are scenes with Cody and a woman. Scenes with Cody, another man and a woman. Cody with just a man or men and Cody by himself. Every site I have found that at least is trying to blur that line has stopped updating.
Cody is a muscular, very fit guy that looks like he probably had a past in sports of some kind. One part that impresses me about his scenes is he seems to really be into all of them. Even the solo ones, which could be seen as a bad thing by some since he does seem to really embrace his own attractiveness.
There are over 300 scenes, as helpful as their categories are, they don’t have one for “bisexual”. I’m going to estimate there’s maybe 30 bisexual scenes, maybe 10 hetero and around 80 solo, the rest are gay scenes, but are not always the typical gay scene. There are ones where Cody and another guy or guy masturbate together. These too are appealing to me.
The video quality on this site is good with around 250 of the scenes having at least 720p or 1080p download choices. As a whole this network – Next Door Studios – in my opinion, is as good as it gets for straight females looking for sites with males masturbating and I think Cody’s site is the best of the sites on the network. |
|
05-18-20 10:27pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
200
|
Next Door Male
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Possibly the biggest solo male site.
Most of the guys are masculine enough to appeal to straight women.
Over 500 solo videos on this site, the number could be higher, but I’m not watching every scene to see if another man slips in later in the scene.
Newer videos have up to 1080p – but no 4K.
Easy site to use and download from. Works with free download manager.
Photos that can be downloaded, but I don’t look at the photos. |
| Cons: |
Some of the guys just are not going to appeal to straight females. I’m only mentioning that because the title of the site, “Next Door Male” has nothing in it to show that it’s a gay model site.
The last update was 6/11/2019
Video quality matches the site’s inconsistency. This site has scenes covering a 15 year period. It doesn’t look like anything has been remastered. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the best site on the Next Door Studios network – if you are a straight woman. The whole theme is solo men. I’m going to say the majority of these men could be believable straight men. There is a whole “tough guy” or maybe it’s a military vibe with the guys. I’m not American so I’m basing that on stereotypes. There are a lot of tattooed guys. Short hair, muscular physiques, not a lot of really big dicks, so I guess they are really going for the “guy next door” look with their models.
The scenes show one of the weaknesses of solo men porn. They aren’t trying to tease the viewer, they aren’t talking much, they are just trying to cum as fast as possible.
I do like that the scenes are filmed in different houses/rooms, and it makes it look like these guys just showed up at home and decided to record themselves masturbating. One solo men site I was on had the men all using the same room and couch to masturbate on. It was like being a fly on the wall of a sperm clinic.
I listed over 500 solo scenes in the pros. The number is closer to 600, but as mentioned, I am not watching them all from start to finish to make sure there’s not another guy in some of the scenes.
The one part that is a concern is the video quality. This took awhile and might not be exact, but in 2012 they added 1080p. That is only about 1/3 the total videos. The other 2/3 were before 2012. Those either top out at 720p or 480p.
I think with this niche and seeing that it’s no longer updating, you have to take what you can get and not complain too much. I don’t think they can add much personality to the scenes since the created “masculinity” might not hold up as well. Besides tattoos, beards, there are UFC posters on the walls in some scenes and most of the guys are “hairy”. I have learned enough about gay porn trying to find solo men scenes that I know this more masculine look is a niche in gay porn.
The scenes give very little to talk about other than a man sits down or stands in front of a mirror and starts masturbating. It’s a very good site and network if that sounds like something you would like. |
|
05-18-20 10:25pm
Replies (1)
|
|
