| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
151
|
Lara's Playground
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Her husband’s site JimSlip is included.
Most, but not all, of the content is older/younger lesbian
Nylons, pantyhose and feet focus.
Lately updates at three times a month.
Currently has 253 scenes. |
| Cons: |
No PU discount.
The site layout is a bit dated. It does not look like newer sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
I share a few things in common with Lara Latex. We both love scenes with nylons and pantyhose. We also love showing feet and getting attention to our feet. I would call myself a reverse foot fetishist. Neither of us are barely legal or tiny. In fact she is my same height at 5’10”. She loves her girls and I love watching girls. She has many scenes with guys too and lately she mentions she has an escorting career. I love her enthusiasm and her pure enjoyment of her sexuality. I would say she is a great role model for women who enjoy sex and are assertive about it. She has pantyhose, garter belts, girdles, seamed stockings and high heels. Lara loves to use costumes in her scenes as well. Sometimes she plays a maid or a nurse. The one that gets me is her as a schoolgirl. That stretches my imagination as she is tall, about 40ish and rather large breasted. She loves shorter women and being the older female. In fact that is played up quite a bit and makes for many hot scenes. Most of her partner women are pros and are not as much fun to watch as she herself is. I was pleasantly surprised to see Destiny DeVille paired with Lara. She is Indian, born in Bombay (Mumbai) and there have never been many in porn. In repressed India porn is illegal and women have very few rights as well. I have not seen her in many years and I think she is retired.
In her heterosexual scenes with guys, they aren’t your usual porn guys, in fact mostly they look like fans of the site who got lucky.As an extra added value her husband has his own site, Jim Slip. His scenes are older/younger and for the most part entertaining.
I was able to find a discount for this site and it helps with an older site like this one.
Although much of the site is rather old, I would recommend this if you can find the discounted price. I think 87 is a fair rating. |
|
09-28-20 09:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
152
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Maybe the most diverse content on this network.
It is the biggest site on the network with 687 scenes.
The scenes have a video and picture set with newer ones having 4K (see cons).
Not all scenes are as formulaic as most of the sites on this network are.
Simple navigation system is usable, uncluttered and works well.
Pretty girls especially in the older scenes. |
| Cons: |
Only one-fourth of the scenes even have 1080p. The scenes from 2013 and back have 720p as the highest download option and some of the even older scenes top out even lower with 576p being the largest download option.
It looks like this site was once the network’s top site. It is now only updating once per month and while there are still days left in September 2020, there hasn’t been an update this month. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is frustrating for all the right reasons. At one time, it was updating daily and the scenes didn’t stick to a formula. There is some anal mixed in, rimming, lesbian, group, threesomes, it’s like when they moved to naming their sites after a specific niche they developed the formulas for each niche or a template even and limited their creativity.
Which is why this site is frustrating. The older scenes are very good, but the video quality is a large drop-off from the newer scenes. It really isn’t a huge deal to me, but it probably would be to others. I can watch 480p if the action is good enough. I think the size of the site shows how much they were once putting into the content on it. They have 687 total scenes, but only 45 of those scenes were released over the last 5 years.
There still isn’t much story or reason for the sex other than filming a porn, but there is more emotion and slight kinkiness in the older scenes. It feels like the site has been presented 3 different ways. From 2016-2020 it is mostly plain, little emotion porn and only 10 updates per year. From 2010-2016 there was moderate emotion in the scenes and they released around 22-24 updates per year. From 2006-2010, there was high emotion and they released around 90 updates per year. I would guess somewhere around 2010 is when they started separating their content into niches and that’s when they lost some of the creativity and diversity the 2006-2010 years showcased. Those time spans also go from 2016-2020 (very high video quality), 2010-2016 (good video quality) and 2006-2010 (standard video quality at best).
I know it’s a big if, but if you don’t mind the lower quality video this site’s older content is the best content -- in my opinion -- on the entire network. The action is good and varied, the models are cuter or prettier, there are threesomes including two guys with one girl. There are group scenes with as many as four people in them and there are lesbian scenes too. It seems like a lesson in if it’s not broke don’t fix it, but they fixed it and broke it. |
|
09-28-20 09:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
153
|
My MILFz
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Newer site that has a lot of potential.
Bills Using Epoch
Includes access to live cam shows and thousands of other streaming videos as a bonus.
Older women and younger men.
59 scenes currently.
Updates twice per month, could be more but it's better than none. |
| Cons: |
Pornusers does not have a discount
There are no downloads as the site is streaming only |
| Bottom Line: |
My Milfz hits on another interest of mine, which Is older and younger. In this site the tables are turned a bit towards the women being older than the guys. Being MILFs they are in my age range. Mostly the scenes use the themes of a stepmother or a horny housewife. I am neither and don’t expect to be. Still some story is better than the standard in and out sex found so often in ordinary porn. The scenes are hot enough for me, but there are just not enough of them. I can’t fault the site for lack of trying. Even during the pandemic, new videos are being added twice a month. The low number of videos and photosets,59, is because the site is fairly new and only started in 2019.
In contrast, I can fault the site for being streaming only. Yes I know this is a growing trend in porn, but after my subscription is over I would want to get off on some of the better videos again. There is no discount through Porn Users, however and the biller is Epoch. They are easy to work with and cancellation is simple.
If this site had no extras, I would say it needs more time to grow before it is ready to join. The extras are some of the best on any site I have ever signed up for. There is a cam site with many thousands of models that compare with those of the best and better known cam sites. They will strip to nude and put on a great sexy show faster too. Faster equals less tipping and less watching them waste time until they get more tips.
If you are like me, you will love the other streaming sites that are in the niche of older /younger. You get Family Screw, Grandparents X, Granddadz, and Grandmams. They are all a bit different from your average older/younger porn and are worth checking out. There are so many other streaming videos that you get that you have to find something that you will like. I mean seriously a lot as there are over 15,000. Some of those sites that are included as streaming only here can be joined with downloads, it's a nice feature and a good way to test out other older/younger sites before spending the money on them.
I would go with a score of 85 as you get so much value for your dollar. |
|
09-28-20 09:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
154
|
Ex GF Box
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
What looks to be genuine amateur content
There are 229 scenes with no new updates in sight
Only one downloadable video option, but it is 720p WMV
Mixture of niches and the performance quality is just as varied
There are some hidden gems in these videos including a few group scenes. |
| Cons: |
No streaming ability. I like to scan through a scene to see if it’s worth downloading, but even though they have the option to stream nothing happens when you hit play.
The poor performances in some of the scenes.
Every scene varies including location, camerawork, attractiveness of models and there are more bad ones than good ones. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have seen the ex-GF network and thought maybe this was related to it, but I’m pretty sure it’s not. These videos are of young European guys and girls. I don’t know how much I believe the ex-GF part. The scenes I have downloaded and watched seem more like a desperate female trying to break into the porn industry by having someone film her having sex. Maybe the part that signals “amateurs” more than anything else are the guys in the scenes. There are guys in these scenes that look like they were picked up on the side of a road and cast into their first ever video. It is hard to tell how old these scenes are too. There is a group of guys that are in a couple of the scenes that have mullets, are wearing wife beater tank tops and look like they were just released from a low-security jail for shoplifting. It’s at least authentic.
That goes into the performances. The guys in these scenes give it their all. The girls go from at least interested and trying to look like they would rather be sleeping. The scene count is misleading as well. At least half of the scenes do not have videos with them. It seems to be either photos or video for each one. I haven’t found one scene yet that has both video and photos. There is a lot broken within the site too. The scenes with just pictures don't even have a picture of the girl in the scene. It’s a broken image with the x in the corner.
I do think there’s some redeeming qualities. Some of the videos are pretty good. The 720p video isn’t bad either. I think the biggest positive is this seems very authentic. It’s a nice change from the other sites on this network where I feel like nearly everything is formulaic and repetitive. There are some public and outdoor scenes too. I think this site makes me realize how frustrating the network is. Seeing the same positions in the same style room for nearly the same exact amount of minutes is not good when it comes to porn. This site is receiving a higher score than it probably deserves, but some might look over this site if they join this network. Maybe a decent score will make others look at it to get a break from the monotone style of most of the sites on this network. |
|
09-28-20 09:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
155
|
Sssh.com
(0)
64.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Award winning porn for women. That's what the main page says.
Implies the stories in the scenes were written by professional erotica authors.
This should be a con, but I am going to give them credit for doing a great job of marketing what is a poor to mediocre site.
I believe there is a market for this type of "female-aimed" porn, it's just not for me. |
| Cons: |
Has not updated in years. The site itself does not look modern either.
Boring content that is just not erotic enough
Very little if any HD content. The photo sets are also low quality and do not even zip downloads.
Not a big name biller.
The site is hard to use as it has folders inside folders to find only low quality inside. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am very interested in the niche of porn for women. I never knew that back in 1999, there was a site dedicated to what us girls want to see. So I took the plunge and joined. The site was only $4.95 so I figured I did not have much to lose by checking it out.
In the more than 20 years since this site opened, there have been two major changes. One is that women have become more assertive sexually and we know what we want and how we want it. The other change is in the world of porn. It is now so readily available that we have choices. When this site was started this was it. For women we have seen a lessening of the stigma there once was when we admitted to liking porn. To a degree porn itself has evolved, just not enough. One day there will be better choices but modern porn is still a man’s world.
For me this was a history lesson, a peek into the world of sexual entertainment of a different time and a different place. The founder was a woman. Looking at it now, she made a site that seems to represent stereotypes of what women need. There is a large emphasis on sexy stories, shopping and makeup. That may be fine for some, but it is not me in 2020. I think she made a site that she would like. It did not work for many of us and it abruptly ended in about 2015 as a failed experiment. It even comes off as more of a blog or personal experience for the webmaster who decided to add some porn for some extra zest and appeal.
I want to see a lot more that stimulates my mind to make me in the mood. I need a harder edge than many and I am not ashamed to say that. One of my all time favorites is Kink, and this is not in the same class, not the same building or the same country for that matter.
I hate to complain about a site that was extremely cheap to join, but whatever little there was to download, I did not bother to keep.
This site probably deserves a score of fifty, but I am in a good mood today and will give them a few extra points for being a pioneer. I think 64 is about right. |
|
09-28-20 09:29pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
156
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Big site with a lot of teen (females) having hardcore sex.
414 scenes with new updates only coming at 1 per month.
Scenes include a downloadable video and downloadable photo set.
Nearly all of the models are very attractive if you’re into teens.
If you’re into porn not looking like porn this would be a good site for you. It looks like two people just meeting up at one of their houses and having sex. |
| Cons: |
There’s not a lot here to keep me interested except the pretty models. Since I’m not a lesbian that’s not really enough for me.
I don’t know if they are going for the obvious formula not just in the sex, but also in the setting, but is surprising to me to see how much these scenes look alike.
I also wasn’t expecting to see so many tattoos. I like tattoos. It just looks unusual to see teen porn models with full thigh tattoos.
The guys are rarely attractive. |
| Bottom Line: |
As much as any site I have been on this one shows the need for attractive men in porn. Besides the tattoos that seem out of place on the young females, the guys either have oddly placed tattoos or 1980’s style earrings. The guys aren’t likely teens. Most look in their late 20’s at the youngest. Some look like they were born before me. I don’t know if the tattoos clash with the sterile white backdrops in most of the scenes or what it is that I don’t like about the combination of the models/settings, but it’s just not appealing to me. As pretty as some of the models are there are some that are very pale with very dark tattoos having sex in a completely white room. Maybe that is it, the dark tattoos distract my vision and cause me to focus on them.
This is one of the biggest sites in this group of sites with 414 scenes, but they are only updating once per month. I didn’t consider it a con, but there is no ethnic diversity at all. I expected that since the site isn’t based in an ethnically diverse area, but that only hurts the formulaic feel of everything. This is as close to cut and paste porn as I have seen. I join porn sites to see people having sex in non-traditional ways, but what I see here reminds me of the first few times I had sex.
They do have 4K available on the newer videos and the quality is good even if you don’t want the 4K. They have 1080p, 720p, 480p and the site works well. It reminds me of when someone cooks a meal and they put more into the presentation than the taste of the food. With the amount of scenes they have and the amount of pretty models you are sure to find some scenes that interest you. I just don’t think you’re going to find anything you haven’t seen a hundred times before. I’m not going to give a real low score as I will give some leeway for subjectivity. It’s just not a site or network I will try again. I do think there is a market for this type of content. I would think males that just want to see pretty, naked, young females would be that market. I am going to say more than 95% of the content on the site is one on one with only a few threesomes and one or two foursomes or more. Maybe America has taken over my thought process. I think of porn and think of something different than what is very normal sex.
It’s a good site for high quality content with pretty, slim/slender models, just don’t expect to see anything new or different here. |
|
09-28-20 09:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
157
|
First BGG
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All-threesome site featuring two girls and one guy.
The site has been around for 11 years which could be as much of a con as pro.
There are currently 127 scenes with only 1 update per month.
Site navigates well which is to be expected of a site this size.
Newer videos include 4K.
Vendo is the billing processor and they are as easy to use as any biller, maybe easier if you have multiple memberships with them they all show up. |
| Cons: |
Eleven years as a site and it only has 127 scenes. If this site fits a niche you like you will be pleased with the selection, but you won’t get much new content once you download what you want.
It just seems like this studio doesn’t believe in filming any scenes with substantial length to them. Even with a third person added the scenes average 20-30 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
You get the picture with the title of the site. There’s going to be two girls and a boy in each scene. These are not your wilder threesomes. Some of the scenes do have the guy with one of the girls while the other girl sits on the other’s face, but a lot of just looks like two different girls taking turns with the guy. The scenes do feature a lot of double blowjob action if that interests you. I’m not really for sure what they are going for here since I see the word “passionate” a lot, but the actions don’t show that. These scenes are not bad, they just aren’t great. When you see the two girls in the scenes a lot of times you are going to think it’s going to be great. The guy is mostly a clod. He just lays there and lets the two girls take turns doing their positions with him.
You only have 127 scenes here with 1 new one added per month. That has been common for them for the 11 years they have had this site, as they average just a little over 11 scenes per year. I do prefer the American sites that do this same exact niche since you get more dialogue and longer scenes. Some of the scenes feel terribly rushed. The girls are cute in looks to very pretty. The guys are a hit or miss bunch with more misses than hits. They could do better with male model selection.
The newer videos have up to 4K unlimited downloads and streaming. They also offer the standards 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p. The photos can be downloaded in zips. The con side of being an 11 year old site is the oldest videos are 720p max. Those also have 480p and 360p. I don’t mind 720p and often download that resolution, but it could be a problem for others. It seems to be a double whammy here since the site isn’t that big and the older content doesn’t even have 1080p or 4K.
However, I will say I like this site’s scenes better than the one on one sites I have seen on this network. Maybe it’s just the thought that more could happen even if it doesn’t?
I don’t think this site is enough reason to join the network, but when you combine it with the value of the other sites the network comes with it makes this site one of the better ones on the network just because it’s a little different and changes up their formulaic approach their other sites use so much. |
|
09-28-20 09:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
158
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very cheap at $9.95 a month
Vendo is a biller I trust
968 videos and part of five site network as well
Stockings and pantyhose in many scenes
Has been updating once a week during pandemic
Works well on my cell phone. |
| Cons: |
For me the models are hit and miss as to their looks
Too much standard masturbation porn aimed at men. |
| Bottom Line: |
Wet and Puffy has a lot to like about it. At $9.95 a month I took a chance as I like to see women masturbating. I swear I am not a lesbian, but I have had offers where I was tempted.
It is a very large site with 968 videos and a very large network is included. When I took the tour before signing up I saw a lot of videos with stockings and pantyhose, so I thought what do I have to lose? The models use all kinds of toys and methods to get off. I saw a lot of dildos and wands. I also saw them using a pussy pump and wondered why would they do that? How would that feel? What I realized is that they do this to make their pussies look bigger and more inviting for men to look at. I did not find pumped pussies to be sexy and I think men would like this type of scene more than I did. I like to see wet pussies shaking with real earth moving orgasms.
The models are Eastern European pros who were mostly very much eye candy. But as I watched more and more videos I realized their looks were hit and miss. Many did nothing for me. They often seemed like they were just going through the motions and lacked enthusiasm. In most scenes I thought they had real orgasms, but they rarely seemed to be having fun. I like masturbation scenes with models losing themselves in the heat of the moment, maybe even to the point of forgetting they are on camera.
To the site’s credit I must add that I saw a fair amount of anal play and even some dp. Since many of the scenes can only be called extreme, there were many that were exciting to watch. There are just so many scenes that I did find quite a few worth keeping. I also discovered Ria Sunn, a blond beauty that I thought was just too pretty to ignore. I am a big fan of hers after seeing her here.
I think 80 is fair score as it is a very large site at a low price. |
|
09-28-20 08:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
159
|
Dirty Doctor
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A terrific site for many women’s favorite fantasies.
Great looking men and women.
Nice video quality as all scenes are in HD.
Excellent photo sets with one for each video.
Vendo is a very trusted biller.
Comes with a network of 34 other teen sites that I liked. |
| Cons: |
No discount through Porn Users. I recommend looking around on the internet for a better price.
Too small and not updating. I want more. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have a complaint about Teen Mega World. They start sites that I love and then stop updating them. Dirty Doctor has only 38 HD scenes and they stopped adding new ones in 2017 and in 2016 they had only one new update.
What a shame. Dirty Doctor has a lot going for it. To begin with, it is a fantasy come alive for me and many other women. My gynecologist is gorgeous and getting naked for him makes me so hot. He is all business, but I always leave his office feeling like I need to take care of my business when I get home.
The doctors on the site are some of the best older men I have seen in porn. There are several niches featured on Dirty Doctor and one is old and younger. Another is the uniform fetish, as the doctors look the role. There is even a scene where a nurse in uniform “works” along with the doctor.
I wish the scenes were in English as that would add a lot. In the opening of the story, a young lady enters her doctor’s office. They talk for a few moments and I wish I knew what they were talking about. Next she goes behind a partition and she strips. Why? She is about to show him all her intimate parts but she is shy? Then he does the usual doctor things like a pap smear or inserts a speculum. He looks down her throat and she says ah. He has her spread wide in stirrups.
But there is a twist. He breaks every rule regarding sex with his patients. When he gives her a pap smear, he also sticks his fingers inside and stimulates her. He rubs her clit. After he takes the speculum out, he inserts his cock. When he looks down her throat and then takes out the stick, he puts his other hard stick in. When she is spread out in the stirrups, he uses a vibrator on her. In one scene he inserts anal beads while he is massaging her clit. OMG. I need a doctor like this.
In a few scenes, he acts like he is enjoying this, but in most it is played deadpan as if this was routine and normal in a doctor’s office visit. In one scene he has her bend over so he can check her out from behind. He suddenly becomes a clown and makes gestures as if this was a comedy being played out for the audience.
When she leaves he sometimes gives her some medication. I don’t know if he helped her with her “condition” but he sure helped me with mine.
I have seen some of these models before, so I expect these are pros. I am not familiar enough with European models to know who they are. You also get a huge, 34 site teen network as part of your join price. I would give this a 90, but the small number of videos is a big negative in an otherwise near perfect site. |
|
09-28-20 08:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
160
|
Nylons X
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fresh looking young teen models both male and female
Nylons. Need I say more?
Vendo is the biller and is easy to use.
Photo set for each video.
Comes with a network of 34 other teen sites.
The videos are about a half hour each. |
| Cons: |
Archive site that last updated in 2012
Only 32 videos.
Only three download choices. HD at 1280x720 and the other two are SD. |
| Bottom Line: |
When I first joined Teen Mega World, I did not notice this site as it is so small. There are 34 other teen sites included in the network, so you get a lot more than just this one.
I have joined a lot of nylons and hose sites as that is a particular fetish of mine. Here you see fresh faced young models, both young ladies and teen guys that I have never seen before. These scenes are very polished and professionally shot, but the models are not your everyday pornstars. Many of these girls are very thin and need to eat a bit more for dinner than only these cocks, despite them looking quite delicious. The guys are not great in the looks department and their cocks vary from just ok size to a little too small. If that is all you notice, then this site is not for you. This site shows believable teen couples enjoying sex that is more interesting than the usual porn site has to offer.
In each scene these teen girls wear colored hose, opaques and sometimes fishnets. These make for some sexy scenes with the best part being that their legs turn on their partners. I wish they would talk, but I don’t think they speak English. They do speak the language of lust, sex appeal and some raw heat.
Since the site has only 32 videos and a photo set for each, I was left feeling that there should be more. A few scenes are masturbation only, but most can only be called hardcore. I prefer my sites to be a little more kinky, but it is fine as it is. It is mostly just the usual in and out. He puts it there or there and she enjoys it.
There is no discount for joining through Pornusers, but discounts can be found rather easily. The site is worth joining and I feel it has a lot to like about it.
On its own I like it enough for a score of about 80. However, there is a lot of added value in the Teen Mega World network, one of the best there is. |
|
09-11-20 09:48am
Replies (0)
|
Review
161
|
Home Toy Teens
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fresh and very pretty young teen models that I have never seen before.
The videos are a lot of fun to watch
I love to see real orgasms and masturbation
Vendo is the biller and I have had good experiences using them
There is a photo set for each video.
Comes with a network of 34 other teen sites. |
| Cons: |
Archive site that last updated in 2009
Only 73 videos. Not all are even HD 1280x720
There is no PornUsers discount, but you can find one on the internet. |
| Bottom Line: |
I love this site as it uses a depraved sense of humor. I love the weird and offbeat and this is the most fun site I have seen in a long time. Because the site is an archive that is no longer updating, I have to say that I wish it was still going strong.
In 2020 every single woman and nearly every married one has at least one drawer full of her little “friends’. Now they need batteries and have all different speeds and types. Some vibrate and others simulate you getting your pussy licked. Ten years from now we will be able to use toys that I cannot even imagine today.
This site is now eleven years old. Times were not so complex or organized then and our older sisters had to make do with whatever they could find. That is what this site shows in all its glory. They used a wide variety of dildos in all kinds of sizes and shapes. If you did not have a dildo, you had to get imaginative. These very pretty women use cucumbers, shampoo bottles, hair spray bottles, hair brushes, can openers, make up bottles, pears, blush brushes, cans of shaving cream, karaoke microphones, small statues, apple pieces, cans of hairspray, hammer handles, spray bottles, television remote controls, lint rollers, condiment bottles holding some kind of sauce, mascara tubes, glasses, knife handles, corkscrews, leeks mistakenly called an onion here, and eggplants. In one scene a nurse uses a medical baumanometer for taking blood pressure. I have a pretty good imagination, but that one made me laugh. Nearly all the scenes are vaginal but a few are anal.
With only 73 videos and not all of them in even weak HD quality, I wish there were more. I feel this is very female friendly as it shows imagination and the empowerment of women sexually. When we get the urge we will do whatever is necessary. These women give us ideas and are examples of positive women role models in porn. The site should post new scenes and remaster the older videos.
There is no talking in the scenes as is often the case with European porn. I found the women to be very attractive and very much setting the right mood for me. Highly recommended and I think guys would like it too. As the name says, fun begins with home toys. |
|
09-11-20 09:45am
Replies (0)
|
Review
162
|
Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The biggest and best Ladyboy site I have tried out.
An incredible 3,827 scenes and it's updating 3 times per week.
They have over 2,100 models and these all look to be Asian, but I could be wrong on a few.
Over 3,500 of those scenes are solo and that's why I call it the best for me.
The navigation makes it easy to get through this massive site.
I have found their in-house billing to be both responsive and fast in answering questions and canceling memberships. |
| Cons: |
The biggest con here is I feel like this site -- at least for me, nearly makes all other Ladyboy sites obsolete.
Second biggest con is most of the models do not have more than 1 scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am going to start this by saying anyone that likes having their beliefs around men/women challenged go to this site's model search and look up the model GOT. She does have 5 scenes which is a lot on this site and I really can't say I have ever seen a more attractive TS/LB than her. Which is the best part about this site. This site has the prettiest collection of Ladyboy models I have ever seen. I would say better than the last 5 Ladyboy sites I have been a member of combined. I do think there is a question about the attractiveness to a straight female like me. While I am sure I do not have any feelings of being a lesbian, I do like seeing pretty, nude women. I don't even think it's bi-curious. The opportunity has been there before and I didn't take it. I do believe the unveiling of a hard dick when combined with boobs and a pretty face makes me question if that would count as bisexual. I would be interested in how many straight men see these women dressed and need to see the hard dick before turning away their attention. The interest in alternative sex and arousal is high with me, just like I love the Kink network. This site is very close to being my favorite site. I was lucky a few months ago when I found Chaos Men, then last month I took the risk of joining BiEmpire and found my favorite bisexual site. I finally have found my favorite TS/LB site with Ladyboy-Ladyboy.
The numbers put perspective on the whole size of Ladyboy/TS popularity. Besides the 2,000+ models, they have nearly 4,000 scenes. These scenes come with pictures and screenshots, everything can be downloaded and I haven't run into any limits. I do think the price is a little high at $36.95, but I am going to let it expire then see if they have any multi-month deals that reduce the cost. My internet provider is not happy with me!
The scenes are nothing out of the ordinary. The models are. I do believe these models could be good examples for straight men to watch. They do seem to enjoy playing with their dicks more than straight men do, there's more eroticism to it, it doesn't look like they're trying to tear the thing off -- or are angry, or in a race.
The newer videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. I still haven't invested in a 4K monitor and am at the point, I don't think I will. The 720p and 1080p are very clear to me. The advanced search engine is useful on this site, but not as useful as it would be if the models were less attractive. I'm not for sure any of the details like dick size, hair length, even matter to me with these models. The beauty here is in watching what appears to be an attractive woman playing with her hard dick. The femininity of these models is very high and can be seen when they rub their nipples, slide their hands up and down their sides all before touching their dick and sometimes go back to touching other parts of their body even after starting their masturbation. It's highly erotic to me and that's what I was hoping to find in this niche. I would not only recommend it to TS/LB fans, but even to those with any curiosity towards TS. It is the best and biggest Ladyboy site I have been on. |
|
09-09-20 02:17am
Replies (0)
|
Review
163
|
Bad Daddy POV
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A glorious tribute to the always growing stepfamily niche of porn!
188 scenes with updates coming in every 3-4 days.
Pretty girls and settings that will make you believe these are barely legal girls.
Jerk Off Instruction scenes included, I believe these scenes could be the easiest way for straight women to get into watching a solo woman.
Not a lot of download options, but they do have 480p, 720p and 1080p
Navigation is good and site includes access to the Full Porn Network. |
| Cons: |
I have admitted I like perversion, but there are some of these settings that are going to push your button for, "is that going too far?"
Site is a little cluttered with 3 ads across the top and 4 across the bottom. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm going to explain the settings part since it made me laugh, but may be a little too perverse for some. Some of the scenes happen in an all-pink bedroom. There are stuffed animals, glittery curtains, all the stereotypical items you would expect to see in a little girl's bedroom. They do go out of their way to point out all their models are 18 or older and they do not condone incest. Part of the scenes are Jerk Off Instruction. I wouldn't say I have had any problems being attracted to watching young women masturbate, but for some women there is a stigma that comes with watching other women masturbate. I do think these Jerk Off Instruction scenes directed at men, can be an easy introduction to porn for women who are not used to watching it. I do believe most women had at least one moment in their life where they thought about teasing a guy and talking him step by step through how she wants him to masturbate for her. I could be wrong, but I have introduced the niche to other women and they like it too.
The other scenes are filmed from a POV orientation of the Bad Daddy. Who is supposed to be the stepdad having sex with his stepdaughter. I do think this site does this style of porn very well. Most of the stepfamily sites I have joined and even liked use humor or unbelievable stories to show you it's not real. This site doesn't. Since you don't really see the stepdad it's more about seeing the young woman looking seduced, curious and aroused by this charming older man. I like it.
They are nearing 200 scenes. These scenes each come with a small photo set you can download and the videos have 480p, 720p and 1080p download options. It's a simple site and that's not a bad thing. The biggest reason I returned to this site and network was I saw where they had a new Karma Rx scene and she's probably my favorite. I noticed rearadmiral's comment about the age of the models being too high to fit the stepdaughter role and can see that, even with Karma Rx who I believe is late 20's. I guess we just have to use a little more suspension of belief and figure the mom's a cougar with a younger husband!
The scenes while lacking the humor of a site like Family Strokes, there are times I do find myself laughing. Whether it's bad acting or really bad use of words. They do push the serious side of the site, but not as much as all their disclaimers make you expect. The site and network is worth a try. There is a lot of good content on the site and network. This site is the reason I came back. I do think it's interesting that I know more women who like the Jerk Off Instruction scenes more than the number of men that do. Recommended for those that like a little perversion in their porn. |
|
09-09-20 02:15am
Replies (1)
|
Review
164
|
Ladyboy.xxx
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly solo Ladyboy site.
Nearly 2,000 scenes with 3 updates per week.
Over 750 models, the models here are either all Asian or it's close to all, a few look possibly Indian (some consider Indians to be Asian).
Site navigates well and easy join/cancel system through the site's own biller.
Advanced search is the most comprehensive search I have seen on a TS site.
Currently includes 2 other previously standalone sites which I also am reviewing. See first con. |
| Cons: |
It's more expensive than advertised. It's listed as $29.95 on TBP and Porn Users, a few other sites list it as $20.99, but no matter where you go through, the price is $36.95. I do believe it has to do with them including two very good standalone sites (Ladyboy Ladyboy and Asian American Ladyboys).
I don't like the way the site is laid out. Upon signing in you are taken to what looks like a blog. It lists comments by the owners of the site. Updates. It's too much to read through to get to the content. They do have tabs to switch to models and updates. Which is what I am used to seeing when I sign in on a site.
I reviewed the main Grooby site last month and all 3 of these I am reviewing this month are also Grooby sites. I do not think they worry about the quality of each scene or even quality of models. I really like this site a lot better than the main Grooby site, but there are scenes here that just are not appealing. |
| Bottom Line: |
Last month, I was a little negative about the main Grooby site. The Grooby sites say they were the original TS sites online and I believe that. The amount of content is not only surprising, but the amount of sites they have is too. I feel like they own half of the entire TS online porn genre. I do think it brings up the quantity/quality debate. The scenes on Ladyboy.xxx are almost all solo. There are some scenes in the older episodes with a man with the Ladyboy, but I did join for the solo scenes. The advanced search brings a different quality to this site. You can select basic choices like "dick size", if you are looking for hardcore action, you can also select that in the advanced search, there are around 50 hardcore scenes total. You can even select Ladybody with female or Ladyboy with male in the advanced search.
There really isn't any story whatsoever in the scenes. Most of the videos are under 20 minutes and just feature a solo model masturbating until orgasm. The models on this site are better overall -- to me, than on the main Grooby site. This site goes into the attraction of boobs and hard dicks. I do think this genre is as aimed at women as men or anyone that's looking for something different the average porn scene offers. There is a downside to these cuter, even prettier Asian models, there's almost no dialogue. I believe it gives the scenes a clinical feel. Someone turns the camera on, the model starts masturbating with little to no noise, she orgasms, the camera turns off. Maybe that could be attributed to how long Grooby has been in business? They have been doing it so long it's easy and they just cruise through the scenes.
I would make a direct comparison of this site to watching the girls on Nubiles.net masturbate. There does seem to be some shyness, maybe even timid and you get some scenes that while realistic, make me feel like the model is a little uncomfortable.
The quality of the videos is as good as I have seen on TS sites. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. They have photo sets for each scene that you can download in zips and they also have screenshots in zips you can download. It is very hard to fault their content. If I had a personal complaint it is a very subjective one that some of the models just aren't attractive. Is it possible that TS content maybe has a higher standard on looks than straight content? While I enjoy the TS solo sets it is because there aren't enough solo male masturbation sites. That would make it seem like I want to see masculine TS, but I don't. I want to see the most feminine looking TS. Other than that, when combining the excellent quality, easy and expansive navigation, this is a site I would recommend to any TS fan or even to straight women interested in watching a dick be masturbated. |
|
09-09-20 02:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
165
|
TS Playground
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my favorite Transsexual sites, was the first one I ever joined.
861 scenes with a new scene added weekly.
Very pretty models, I think the prettiest non-Asian transsexuals.
Newer videos are 1080p and are unlimited downloads.
Photo sets for most scenes and these are also downloadable.
More solo than hardcore scenes.
Also includes scenes of transsexuals with females. |
| Cons: |
The site runs and loads slow. Download speeds are fine.
There is not a lot that can be done with a solo transsexual scene. There is a risk of becoming repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
While I believe Grooby's Ladyboy Ladyboy is the best overall transsexual site, this site runs a close second. What you do get here is bigger dicks. Ladyboy Ladyboy is more about the beauty of the models, the erotic movements, while TS Playground does have a lot of very pretty models they are going to get more attention for the size of the transsexuals dicks.
There is a lot of variety in the scenes. There are transsexuals with transsexuals, transsexuals with men, transsexuals with women and solo. The site is easy to use and navigate, but it does load slowly. It also has what I call false loads. There will be times it tries to load, but nothing comes up on the screen. That is really the biggest complaint I have. This was the first transsexual site I tried several years ago and it still impresses me. There are some of these scenes where the masturbating transsexual becomes so aroused she squirts cum on the camera.
I do like the transsexual with women scenes so those are a bonus for me. The production is more polished here. I believe Mike Adriano produces these scenes. There is a more professional feel to the scenes than most transsexual sites have, but it doesn't hurt the enjoyment factor of the scenes.
There are 861 scenes with all 861 scenes offering downloads from 160p to 1080p with 240, 360, 480, 720 all also being available. The photo sets besides being downloadable also have around 100 photos in them.
You will notice the lengths of the scenes varying greatly. Some are as short as 5-10 minutes while some are as long as 80 minutes. There are even group scenes which isn't real common in the transsexual genre and to make it even more uncommon, some of those group scenes include men, women and transsexuals. It's a very good transsexual site that is one of the few I have seen that look more mainstream and professional. It's highly recommended and is also cheaper than a lot of transsexual sites. This site also comes with full Evil Angel access too. It's how I discovered Evil Angel. The billing goes through Gamma and is easy to cancel. |
|
09-09-20 02:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
166
|
Devils Film
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large, multi-niche network that has a few of my favorite niches in large numbers.
7,198 scenes with a new scene added every 3-4 days.
All newer scenes have 160p - 1080p download options.
Navigation works well if you can control your clicking.
Most scenes also come with downloadable pictures.
Good streaming player if you're not interested in downloading the videos. |
| Cons: |
A lot of the non-fetish content seems generic to me.
The filter options are confusing and make it best for people who know exactly what they're looking for. |
| Bottom Line: |
Devil's Films is a porn studio that while maybe are not that known for it, are one of the best studios for fetish and alternative content. The biggest draw for me are the 147 bisexual scenes. That is bigger than many standalone bisexual sites and the content is high quality. They also are still releasing new bisexual scenes which can only be said for a few sites. There are 723 transsexual scenes too. The best part about their transsexual scenes is they have a large amount of threesomes that include a male, a transsexual and a female. You don't see that a lot anymore. There are only a few sites that I know of that have transsexuals with women. That touches on my interest in bisexual sex and adds a woman to the mix. Those close to 900 combined scenes are my main interest on Devil's Film.
They still have another 7,000 scenes for everyone else. The scenes I have watched that are not bisexual or transsexual do give me a generic feeling. Everything seems scripted, timed and logged. It doesn't mean the content is bad. It just means it's not what I'm into.
Their video quality is impressive with 1080p and down being available on nearly all their videos and the newer videos add the 4K option. The pictures are just screencaps, but they are downloadable and they do have over 200+ in nearly every set. They are not high resolution pictures.
Besides the bisexual and transsexual scenes they have a large collection of stepfamily scenes from their series, "Out of the Family", it has 857 just from that series. There are lesbian series, a hairy series, a teen series and over 350 gangbang scenes in their Devil's Gangbang series. I do believe most if not all of the models are pros. I don't know all of them, but most do look familiar.
I believe anyone trying Devil's Films should have a reason besides "porn". They cover a lot of niches and fetishes. The filter system is very useful once you get the hang of it, but until you do, there's a good chance you're going to click the wrong filter and get yourself lost in a sea of scenes. It's a large network that is really more fetish-heavy than I think most realize. Nearly a third of their scenes are transsexual, bisexual, stepfamily and gangbang. If you're into any of those you will find a lot to like and download. The downloads are unlimited as long as you join using the download option and not the streaming-only option. |
|
09-09-20 02:06am
Replies (0)
|
Review
167
|
Strap Attackers
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pegging and anti-pegging action
163 scenes but is no longer updating.
Sexy male and female models. Including many mainstream models.
Has some of the first mainstream pegging scenes, dated as 2000.
Video quality varies, but most of the scenes have at least a 720p option, the newest ones have 1080p, the oldest ones are maxed at 480p.
Scenes also have photo downloads and the videos are usually long (anti-pegging causes longer) |
| Cons: |
No new updates, the older video quality is not very good.
This will never be a niche for everyone. |
| Bottom Line: |
I believe the best pegging site is Divine Bitches on Kink's Network. For those that don't know what pegging is it is when a woman uses a strap-on dildo on a man anally. Anti-pegging is considered his reward of getting to have sex with her after she is finished. I think the first mainstream male performer willing to do pegging was Christian XXX. He was also one of the first mainstream male performers willing to do scenes with transsexuals. He has a lot of scenes on this site including the oldest scene from 2000. While pegging hasn't ever had a big following this site surprised even me with mainstream female stars like Jynx Maze, Kristina Rose, Brooklyn Lee and Megan Foxx taking on the role of the pegger.
I do think the better scenes on this site are as good as Divine Bitches scenes. Pegging isn't something I have tried, but it does seem sadistically erotic to think a man would even want to have sex with a woman after she used a strap-on on him and I do believe that is a strong part of my attraction to the pegging scenes. Being from India, the mention of sticking something up a man's butt would get you possibly stoned -- and I'm not talking about drugs. The guys in these scenes are all common performers in this niche and most of them are very masculine, handsome guys.
There are 163 scenes to download or stream. The site looks like a lot of niche sites. There are some scenes from the early 2000s, things picked up around 2010 and started slowing back down around 2014-15. More than half of the videos have 720p and around 1/3 have 1080p as the highest download option. The rest have 480p as their max resolution. Divine Bitches is the same way when it comes to resolution quality. A lot of their best scenes are only available in 480p.
I believe this site is a good representation of what is known as "fair play". If she gets to stick that dildo up your butt, you get to have sex with her. I know this is an assumption on my part, but I think the sex with the female receiving looks more real after she has stuck the dildo up the guy's butt. I don't know if maybe they form some kind of otherworldly bond from the role reversal, but the scenes are all good and worth downloading for fans of pegging and anti-pegging. I can only recommend it to those who know pegging and like it. For anyone else, maybe take a peek at it and see if you think you would like it. |
|
09-09-20 02:04am
Replies (0)
|
Review
168
|
Blow Pass
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
5 site network with 80% of it being blowjobs.
Very large network with over 5,500 scenes and they are updating complete with masked models. They update nearly daily, looks like 6 updates per 7 days.
Over 2,100 models, some look like amateurs, but a lot are pros.
Immoral Live is included and it is a very good site plus is the only one that isn't just blowjobs.
Navigation works well considering the size the network.
Video quality is excellent. |
| Cons: |
Blowjobs are fun to watch, but there are really a lot of blowjobs on this network! It gets repetitive.
The network hub page feels cluttered, but there's only one ad. They just have a lot of content on the main page. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network reminds me of when I lived in India. We were visited by family friends from the United States. My parents took them out to for dinner and they couldn't believe everything on the food bar -- was chicken or a form of chicken. That is how this network makes me feel. There's a lot of blowjobs and more blowjobs. There are other sexual actions that happen and there is the site Immoral Live which is very good, but the scenes here are about the chicken -- I mean, blowjobs.
The Covid Pandemic scenes are a little out there since the guy wears a mask while getting a blowjob and the woman starts out with a mask on. That's going to get complicated. I do like how they have this network laid out. The sites are: Mommy Blows Best, Only Teen Blowjobs, Throated, 1,000 Facials and Immoral Live. It makes it easy to find your preferences whether teen blowers, MILF blowers, deep throaters or facials. Immoral Live is like a hardcore site with the content being recorded live without cuts or scripts. It is a nice break from all the blowing.
The video quality on this network is as good as I have come to expect from a Gamma site. They offer 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p on all scenes with the newer scenes also adding 4K. With over 5,500 scenes that's a lot of high quality porn. The models do look like professionals or soon to be professionals. As a female I think that does change these scenes. The pro models seem to have a steady, consistent pattern they follow when giving a blowjob. That does make the content repetitive too. It makes me wonder why guys are so much into blowjobs.
This network is a good value. But I did find myself losing interest in it. I think for fans of blowjobs it's an easy choice to join, but if you're not a real big fan of blowjobs, I'm not for sure I would recommend it. It has all the traits you look for in a good porn site, pretty models, high quality videos, easy to use navigation, not a lot of annoying ads, unlimited downloads from what I have experienced, but it does get stuck at it's mostly blowjobs. Good enough for a month join to give it a try and to also check out Immoral Live. |
|
09-09-20 02:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
169
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All-around excellent hardcore site.
Production values, technical quality and performances are all top notch.
858 scenes to be downloaded or streamed.
Downloadable photo set with each scene and behind the scenes photos as well.
Comes with the even better (in my opinion) Teen Fidelity site and Kelly Madison's solo site.
Scenes are typically long (30-45 minutes) and are well played out (doesn't feel as planned). |
| Cons: |
The videos autoplay when you click on each scene. They also fill your whole screen. You have to untick the box in corner of the screen to stop the full screen autoplay, but even then it still autoplays, just not full screen.
They try to appeal to everyone with their model choices and when you do that, there will always be some male and female talent the viewers don't like. One recent scene features a man completely covered with tattoos. It just depends on the viewer's feel about body modifications.
There is a download limit that doesn't bother me as much as it might others. I have been a member for 9 months (bought a year membership last year). The download limit is 15 scenes per week. I think it depends on what your interests are. It is a terribly low number that equals out to 2 scenes per day, but I have what I want from the older scenes so I don't really notice the limit. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been a member on this site for close to 9 months. I reviewed Teen Fidelity (93) awhile back and really like it. Porn Fidelity is very similar to Teen Fidelity except the scenes are not as teen focused. The husband in the duo, Ryan Madison, is featured on both sites and gets to play with the teens. There are teens (or they look like teens to me) on Porn Fidelity too. Their sites have a feeling of friendly, even comforting settings. It is as if the models are just visiting Ryan and Kelly in their home. And a porn scene breaks out.
For all the technical greatness of the site there is that pop-out full screen autoplay feature to frustrate. If you plan on scanning through the scenes make sure to put on headphones or mute the tab. There are other workarounds including extensions for your browser that will stop the video from playing, but it's best to just mute the tab. Just because Kelly and Ryan are understanding about their interest and love of sex and porn -- doesn't mean everyone's household is!
The older content should be expected to be of much lesser quality, but the oldest scenes (2003) even have 720p on most of them. The newest videos have the highest resolution download options, including -- 5K, 4K, 1080p and 720p. I think they need to slow down. I haven't even made it to 4K yet! The files are huge and should be noted. The 5K of a newer scene is 13.55 GB, the 4K is 9.07 GB, the 1080p is 4.59 GB and the 720p is 2.49 GB.
Most of these scenes start out with the male and female dressed, conversing, and it builds into a kiss. There isn't the typical rushed feel with the scenes like on most hardcore sites. The picture sets also capture this well. I wouldn't put this in a heartcore category or anything other than hardcore. Which is what makes the content good to me. It starts out like it's going to be one of those melancholy music playing scenes, then turns into a hardcore sex scene filled with passion and intensity.
I was made aware of a new download limit that only allows 15 downloads per week. This isn't something I had noticed since I have been a member for 9 months and don't have any catching up to do. I do not know if there is a different join option to get unlimited downloads, but when I first joined in my current membership it was unlimited or at the very least not as low as 2 scenes per day. I have different feelings about download limits. I was originally only streaming porn when I first started watching it. I do think 2 scenes per day is a low number, but I don't think it's a deal breaker considering they only release one new scene a week. I do think it promotes buying a longer-term membership if you're wanting to download a lot of the older scenes.
I haven't downloaded a lot from Porn Fidelity as I prefer Teen Fidelity and have every scene from it. As a package along with the Kelly Madison solo site, this is still one of the best deals in porn, especially if you value quality over quantity thanks to the download limit. |
|
09-08-20 11:09pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
170
|
Girlsway
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the biggest lesbian sites I have tried.
1,868 scenes with new scenes being added 3-4 times a week.
Video quality is great and continues to get better.
Picture sets are downloadable, but are small with less than 50 photos in each.
Has multiple niches within it and series or spoofs.
Solo scenes that are due to Covid-19, the girls film themselves masturbating at home. |
| Cons: |
There's not a dick to be found. At least not a flesh one, but plenty of fake ones.
Overacting, a lot of surprised faces at what's under another girl's panties. |
| Bottom Line: |
Girlsway does a very good job of splitting the sub-niches up and even have their sub-niches listed to explain them. There are:
Girls Try Anal, Mommy's Girl, Moms on Moms, Oral Experiment, Sex Tape Lesbians and True Lesbian. Besides those, they also have multiple series running at any specific time. These include Cougar Queen: A parody of Tiger King, there will multiple parts to it. Body Swap is one of their newer series that is good and has multiple parts.
My favorites are the Sex Tape Lesbian scenes. The girls play games like Dare Wheel and that leads to a sex scene. They have one that is nearly an hour long based around trying on bikinis. These scenes add enough story to make them more interesting than a lot of lesbian porn I watched. The models are very attractive. Those with the older/younger fetish they also have over 400 scenes of it with the story-driven, "Mommy's Girl" scenes. Some of the scenes are silly and playful like you would expect from a site like Team Skeet. One of the newer scenes in style has a hair stylist fixing one model's hair while the model is receiving oral from another female. They make it like the hair stylist doesn't notice at first.
They are uploading as much as anyone right now (lesbian) with an average of 3-4 times per week. The video quality on every scene has a minimum of 1080p as its highest option. There are also 720p, 540p, 480p and mobile download options. The most recent 365 scenes also have 4K downloading option. I am having a problem deciding if I like it better than Sapphic Erotica. I think I do. The amount of content is similar, but Girlsway has the added benefit of a story and some dialogue.
There also is more personality in the scenes on Girlsway. Scenes that probably make the girls genuinely laugh like 4 students touching each other while the teacher's back is turned. My second con is really the biggest one. There is a lot of overacting. Should a girl really be surprised another girl has a pussy too? The only reason I mention that is within 3 minutes the shock and surprise is replaced by the surprised one looking like an expert at giving a female oral sex. I can look over it (usually). The site is just one of the best I have reviewed. My interest in it does waver since I prefer a male in the scene. For lesbian fans I do believe this is one of the top 2-3 lesbian sites available. |
|
09-08-20 11:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
171
|
Le Wood
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Super site directed and operated by porn married couple Mark Wood and Francesca Lee
Though the range of niches is broad there isn't anything too shocking like if Mark was with a transsexual. There are transsexuals on the site, but I guess Mark is behind the camera.
Definitely seeing a progressive married couple at work. Both Mark and Francesca have sex scenes with other people and some threesomes together too.
There are 1,377 scenes, but that number is a little inflated by most scenes also having an accompanying behind the scenes video.
The update schedule is different than most sites. It looks like they do a monthly update for the first week of each month (5-7)
The scenes focus on around 50 DVD series they produce including Anal Newbies with 82 scenes. |
| Cons: |
There are some pretty rough and hardcore scenes on here. I was thinking it might be similar to Porn Fidelity. I don't mind most rough scenes, but a few of these were rougher than I like.
I would like a little more story in the scenes that feature both Mark and Francesca.
The mentioned Behind the Scenes videos that bump the video count up by at least 500. These are short 6-10 minute videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's no secret, I like porn that has some perversion to it. Telling me a husband and wife are filming porn together on their site and having sex with other people is perversion! Which is a problem this site has, but I wouldn't call it a con. Mark and Francesca seem to be such professionals they don't show any emotion other than lust when they see their spouse having sex with others. Mark does look to be the lucky guy. He stars in every Anal Newbies scene I have watched and thought the one with Harmony Wonder and Zoe Bloom were very good, but I am sure Francesca got some revenge after watching how much he was loving the anal with those two, little, young models.
I did bring up some of the scenes can be very rough. One of the newest is a good example. It is with Natalie Porkman, who is one of the skinniest, most innocent looking models I have seen. Mark and Francesca completely destroy her. I can see and understand the sex being rough, but there are parts where Francesca has both of Natalie's arms pulled straight back while Mark jabs her throat with his dick. There is a lot of spitting in the scene, on Natalie's face, in her mouth, that's just degrading to me.
I thought one of the best scenes was Mark with Nia Nacci in Anal Brat for White Cock. I think it's a good example of how rough, anal sex can be done without it being degrading. Both him and her seemed to love the scene. Makes you wonder if Francesca keeps a note on a notepad to go a little faster the next time she's with another guy! I think that would make an interesting series. Mark makes Francesca jealous, Francesca makes Mark jealous.
The site is big with those 1,377 scenes and while I did list the Behind the Scenes as a con, some of those are pretty interesting and aren't a complete waste. All 1,377 scenes can be downloaded (as long as you sign up for the download option $5 more for the first month) in 1080p, 720p, 540p, 480p and mobile resolutions. It's an interesting site that didn't quite live up to my expectations coming from the Teen Fidelity/Porn Fidelity sites also ran by a husband and wife. The roughness doesn't surprise me and I knew there would be some. I do think one of the funniest parts is Mark is in so many of the anal scenes. I can just imagine him saying to Francesca, "But this is a new series and I want it to be perfect!" There are a few other guys that get their chances in the anal scenes. Mark seems like a likeable guy so I would think that helps with him being that involved in the anal scenes. I would recommend it to those into hardcore, anal, even some roughness. |
|
09-08-20 11:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
172
|
Fist Flush
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Women seeing how far they can stick their fist up inside themselves, sometimes with help from others.
Small but very good collection of 78 videos. They have updated as recently as August 2020.
Easy to use site with excellent video quality.
These scenes seem to take on more of a realistic feel to them. Maybe it's just me thinking a woman wouldn't be into this unless she was really into the scene?
I have only been a member of one other fisting site and have to say these models are much prettier than the other fisting site I tried.
Epoch is the payment processor.
Every scene has at least 1080p and 720p videos. Some of the newer ones have 4K. |
| Cons: |
The scene count could be higher, but this niche is poorly represented. Supply and demand thinking?
These scenes would be some of my favorites if the models talked much or explained what is going through their minds when somehow shoving their fist up their pussy and their other fist up their ass. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site was a pleasant surprise for me. As someone that works (sometimes) in sexual therapy, I can understand the need and use of extreme masturbation. Some of the content here goes into extremes I haven't seen one woman do to herself like the scenes with a woman fisting her pussy with one hand and ass with the other. Besides being extreme stretching in a relative area, it takes a lot of flexibility to pull that off.
I would like to see more of the solo scenes in this niche. There are less than 10 of the 78 videos here with a solo model. I can see the attraction, possibly the "heat of the moment" to be fisted when with another person, but the solo ones are as graphic and explicit as any porn. These scenes add draw even more interest with the pretty models. I am not saying this to be offensive, but I thought this was a niche more for the average or below looking models. I do not believe the low video count is a problem. That is combined with how pretty the models are. You just aren't going to find a lot of videos of very pretty models fisting themselves and each other. I talked about being a member on another site featuring fisting. I did not download any videos from it as I thought the models were unattractive. I will download at least half of the videos from this site.
The video quality couldn't be much better. Their oldest scenes all have 1080p, 720p and a few other smaller options including mobile, while the newer scenes offer 4K too.
This is a niche that I don't believe can be faked. There is a lot of realism in these scenes, very clear orgasms with some squirting too. While I do prefer the solo ones for the pure kinkiness of it, some of the scenes with two models also reach that high level of kinkiness. There are scenes where one model is fisting the other and starts giving her oral too while fingering her ass. I am thinking, "What more could she even do to her?" There are even cute moments when one model has a hard orgasm and you can see her laugh or smile like it embarrassed her. This was an overlooked site for me. It hits a happy medium between too kinky and not kinky enough. I thoroughly enjoyed it. |
|
09-08-20 11:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
173
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Dark, moody, roleplay porn that I forgot to review.
They are now up to 285 scenes with regular weekly updates.
Excellent, even believable acting and stories that are much better than the average site.
Production values are as high on this site as any site.
Scenes are long, but not too long, average around 45 minutes.
Plays on all the popular taboos including stepfamily, betrayal and trickery. |
| Cons: |
The writing is good, the acting is good, but they do have some scenes that try to be too dark story wise. It could make some uncomfortable.
It's too bad they can't release more than one scene per week. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was going to review Pure Taboo a few months ago, but there were already two new reviews for it at the time. I almost forgot about reviewing it. This is easily one of my favorite "normal" sites. I know it is strange to call a taboo site "normal", but I do see it that way. The production values, acting and writing are all top-notch for a porn site. There are times that the males overact in attempted "intimidation" roles.
The video quality is very good with all 285 scenes have 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. The most recent 164 scenes also have 4K. I was happy to see the addition of English captions as well.
The scenes also include a photo set you can download, but they are usually just 25-40 pictures in each.
I don't think Pure Taboo is that groundbreaking or even that unique. A lot of sites do the story-driven scenes, the taboos are not as taboo anymore with all the stepfamily porn sites available. Which is what pushes them ahead. They push the models to give their best possible acting performances, they use lights to change the mood of the scenes, they also do add the overacting male. That is not normal in porn. Except for those guys that sound like an elephant that got shot when they cum. Overacting in porn has always been the role of the female models. The men in most of the scenes seem to be a mix between Hannibal Lector and that big, scary professional wrestler. The Deadman guy. Each viewer will see that differently. If you are wrapped up in the story the scary or intimidating, overacting male can be very believable. I do think that separates Pure Taboo from other taboo sites or even scenes. There's a slight moment of uneasiness that tries to make you question if it's acting or real.
This site to me is the best at what it does and that is give the viewer a realistic chance to use their imagination while watching porn. Many sites with the taboo backdrop ruin the scenes with humor or the she's not really that scared overacting female model. I would recommend it to any porn fan as long as they keep in mind it's fictional. |
|
09-08-20 11:00pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
174
|
Panty Pops
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very fetish-related content, but does deviate from the fetish.
There are 145 scenes.
Beautiful models that fit the fetish with mostly plump butts.
POV-filmed and I think this fetish has to be.
Should interest panty lovers, leg lovers and some scenes stick with that fetish.
Newer videos have up to 1080p, but make note of the first con. |
| Cons: |
If you are really into this fetish the older scenes stick with the fetish, but their highest quality download is 480p. It looks like the site was maybe sold and taken into a different direction.
Some of the scenes don't even go into the fetish of the site. They are good sex scenes, but I would like to see more of the fetish.
No longer updating. |
| Bottom Line: |
A Panty Pop fetish is unique since it combines multiple genres of porn. Panty Pops include the female wearing a pretty pair of panties, bending over in front of the camera, taking the guy's dick and rubbing it against her panties. The progression adds sticking the dick inside the panties with the pussy rubbing against the dick or rubbing the dick between the panty covered butt crack. The pop is the finale of the cum shot. In the truest sense of the fetish the panties never come off.
In the newer scenes on this site the panties are off very early in most of the scenes. It just becomes a regular POV hardcore sex scene with no fetish involved. The older scenes do the fetish as well as any site. The combination of genres includes handjobs, panties, cum on clothes (panties). When done properly, it is a very erotic handjob. I don't know enough about when the site was sold, but the earliest scenes are from 2007. The newest are 2018. You can watch the older scenes and tell a distinct difference in them and the newer scenes. It looks like tease was a big deal in 2007, but not in 2018.
The does hurt the site a little since the ones sticking to the fetish top out at 480p quality. I don't see that as a major damning point, but it is too bad they haven't remastered those old scenes. The style of the scenes also changes the length. The earlier scenes are shorter with most of them being under 10 minutes, while the newer ones that stray from the fetish are often in the 20 plus minute range. I find that interesting. When the models were teasing the guys and being more creative then just having sex the guys finished faster.
The models are all professionals except possibly some of the first ones. I do not recognize the models from the older scenes. The newer ones include Liza Rowe, Ashley Fires, Harley Dean and Richelle Ryan. These scenes and fetish are made for the curvier bottom-half models. I may be a little critical of the newer scenes, but none of the newer scenes stay with the fetish. There are a few that use the fetish to begin with, but the scenes quickly turn into standard sex. It's an interesting fetish if you are new to it especially. The older scenes are where you should start. The models are not as pretty as the models in the newer ones, but you do get to see the fetish. |
|
09-08-20 10:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
175
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful models stretching themselves out for all variations of masturbation.
Long, slow becoming fervor masturbation that clearly shows orgasms.
404 scenes with updates seeming to stop 2 months ago.
The site is easy to use with simple searches or complicated if you want to jump into the advanced search.
The scenes include a long video (by masturbation standards) and photo set. Downloads are unlimited.
No ads that I have seen. |
| Cons: |
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes.
Bottom Line:
I see this type of site as being something porn fans will either love or dislike, not hate. You are going to see a lot of spread pussies. There is some teasing. There is some anal play. There is a beautiful model in the same setting as the previous beautiful model spreading her pussy, teasing and possibly playing anally. Some of the models seem to be made for this kind of porn. Their scenes are very good. They love being watched, they love teasing, they love you seeing them having an orgasm. I think if that sounds good to you, you will love the site. If you need more than one person you will probably dislike the site.
It makes me think a site like this is where every gynecologist found their interest in becoming a gynecologist! I do see a site like this as female-positive. The models look stunning, you would not expect them to jump up in a chair and start spreading their legs looking like they do. They look more like they are going out on a nice date. Hopefully, someone bought them a nice dinner before they put on these performances.
The video quality is great, but inconsistent. Of the newest updates, two of the 4 newest do not have 4K, while the other 40-50 do have 4K. That makes me think they may have recycled old scenes. That was a newer term to me until recently. If you are interested in the 4K versions of these videos, you better have a lot of hard drive space and a fast internet connection as some of those are as big as 15 Gigabytes per scene. They do offer lower, in my opinion, better options with the 720p and 1080p versions. The photos add a nice touch. These photos show the model before the scene starts.
There are some unbelievable insertions, but those are in the older scenes. One has a woman masturbating with a baseball bat! The camerawork is a positive or negative for the site. There are a lot of close-ups. I believe close-ups during masturbation are only good if the model is rubbing her clitoris. If her fingers are inside her or a toy is inside her it doesn't make much sense to me to go close-up. I would classify this as a fetish site even though there are no definitive fetishes being played to unless, the pussy, is a fetish. All you need to ask yourself is do you want to look at 400 pussies? That is why I said I don't think any porn fan would hate the site. |
|
09-08-20 10:55pm
Replies (0)
|
|
