| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
DogFart
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The entire Dogfart network consists of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
The network updates 4 times per week.
The network has 1,598 female models.
Over 6,000 scenes with downloadable videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
The whole network has a $4 charge per 4K scene download.
Of the 23 sites, I liked at most 4 of them and would call the rest average or below.
There’s a near total lack of creativity on this network. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
The first hint telling me this is a network directed at men was they list two gay sites on their network. One is Blacks And Boys, the other is Gloryholes and Handjobs. How does that tell me it’s directed at men? They also have a site called Zebra Girls that is about interracial lesbian (gay) sex, but it’s not listed as gay. It’s probably something only a woman would notice, but they’re making it clear lesbians are okay for straight guys, but giving a fair warning to straight guys when there’s a gay male scene.
My overall feeling is the network is not bad as a whole. Nearly all of the sites have at least some good scenes, but my main complaint is the way they focus on certain sites in their new updates and update schedule. I know the Gloryhole.com site has been around a long time, so why keep updating it when you have newer sites that are more creative and just by reading user comments on the scenes are much more liked?
I will use this as an example, the “gay” sites are not very popular as most of the scenes don’t even have any user comments on them, so they stopped updating them. It shows they understand the concept of putting out content your users want, but then you see a site like Blacks on Blondes that has nearly 1,000 scenes and they’re updating it once per week. They’re updating Gloryhole.com twice per month and it has nearly 700 scenes. While the similar, but more creative and -- in my opinion -- better sites like Gloryhole Initiations and We Fuck Black Girls have less than a combined 500 scenes and are only updated once per month. I’m not throwing out a generalization here. The user comments show that members want more of those two sites, but instead are getting the scenes from the same sites that have the most content on them.
The video quality is similar on all 23 sites. All newer scenes have 720p and 1080p download options. They also include a downloadable photo set with each scene. All of the older scenes on all of the sites are 480p. Only a few of the sites aren’t like that and they are the newer sites which are the better sites. Even with the site, Zebra Girls, I can’t imagine why they don’t push it more. It also only gets one update per month.
The network is massive in size and there’s no way you can go through it all in one month. I didn’t feel like any of the solo model sites were worth reviewing. A lack of creativity is bad enough, but adding to it that the same woman is in every scene just makes it too monotonous.
I can’t say I was disappointed in the network and would even say maybe I was a little happier (overall) with it than I expected I would be, but I won’t be joining it again. In comparison to other interracial sites I have been a member of, I do think it’s one of the better ones, especially the newer scenes. I just don’t think it’s that great as a whole network. |
|
02-26-21 06:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
77
|
We Fuck Black Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The reverse interracial that porn usually gives us -- black women with white men.
125 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
One update per month currently.
All videos have 1080p and 720p download options unlike many of the sites on this network.
102 models on this site.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller. |
| Cons: |
It needs a faster update schedule. The network seems to be turning a corner with this site.
There’s not much story, but the scenes feature multiple scenarios which does help (doesn’t become as repetitive). |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
The very first 3 scenes on this site gave me hope that this wasn’t going to be another site that sticks to one scenario. The newest 3 are a one on one scene between a white guy and black teen woman. The second newest is a five white guys with one black woman scene. The third scene is a threesome between two white guys and one black woman. This could be read as a putdown towards the network itself, but that’s more variety in 3 scenes than many of their other sites have in thousands of scenes.
The site’s size is hampered by only one update per month and I’m sure some people would question if all the women really are “black”. That’s one I experience in real life and it goes further into a topic I don’t want to touch.
Though the scenes do offer multiple scenarios they are still your run of the mill porn scenes. The women -- I would think, are the biggest interest in the site since there are some really pretty women on it. The stories (have to read them in the scene description) go back to old stereotypes. The newest scene has a very cute Cecilia Lion with Van Wylde. The description tells she’s always checking out her “surfer neighbor”. I will at least say the person who writes the descriptions at least is creative, saying she noticed “his longboard”. I would just like to see more of that creativity make its way into the scenes.
This is easily one of my favorite sites on this network. Unlike so many of the others this one at least offers 1080p and 720p on all 125 scenes, but still has the $3.99 for 4K per scene price too. The scenes are longer, even the one on one scenes, with many going over 30 minutes and it does show -- at least I think, that Dogfart is trying to improve their sites and the production values. I would have paid the monthly price just for this site. It reminds me a lot of the standalone sites other large networks offer. Great site that really boosts this network. |
|
02-26-21 06:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
78
|
TS Seduction
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Transsexual models seducing men and couples.
Very big site with 646 scenes.
Each scene has a video and photos. You can download unlimited videos and photo sets.
One of the better streaming players for previewing scenes before downloading them.
Interesting scenes with each one ending with a short interview with the TS and other models in the scene talking about their interest in the once taboo niche.
Good production, some bondage, some scenes look rougher and it creates variety this niche usually doesn’t have. |
| Cons: |
The dungeon setting is used for a lot of the scenes. I do think the setting of the dungeon not only takes some of the creativity away, but also makes the scenes look alike.
There are no big resolution videos. The highest they have are 720p.
Some of the TS models really get into the domination in these scenes. These are mostly American or tall, powerful TS models, the action gets a little too rough at times. I like rough, but seeing a man whimpering is a little more than I like or want to see. |
| Bottom Line: |
TS Seduction is one of the transsexual sites I think could be harder for straight men to be into even though they have scenes with women (pussies) in them. The site gives you the premise of a transsexual wanting to seduce a “straight” man. It’s much better than the similar Reality Kings site, “Tranny Surprise”. It is, however, a more hardcore, more dominant, more forceful site than Tranny Surprise. Which I’m only mentioning since the title of the site has “seduction” in it.
They have a good variety of scenarios in their scenes. There are scenes with a transsexual and a straight man. Scenes with two transsexuals and a straight man. Even a few with more than 2 transsexuals with a straight man. There are also scenes with a straight couple (male/female) with a transsexual having sex with both of them.
It is interesting to take note the scenes with a transsexual with a straight couple are almost all in a bedroom with a nice bed and furniture. Most of the other scenes are in the dungeon where bondage is used. That could be what makes me see these scenes as being more hardcore and forceful. I don’t believe any of it is against anyone’s will. They just do a very good job of making you believe that. Though the whimpering seems pretty real!
This site has been around a long time. The oldest scenes on the site are from 2007. The updates stopped in late April 2020. The CEO of the site and network posted a letter last week that said they have used up all of their previously recorded content and are having to turn to compilations and licensing content from other sites until they can start filming again. I do believe this site will start updating again. It’s hard to believe one of their sites that consistently updated for 14 years would be one that gets the axe.
They have 646 scenes with photos and a video for each. You can see the video quality difference from the oldest scenes to newest scenes even though they are the same resolution. The newer ones are clearer.
The transsexuals on this site might not be as attractive to straight men as a ladyboy site’s models. One of the models if you want to look her up is Danni Daniels. Be sure not to search for Dani Daniels. That’s a female model. Danni is attractive to me, but I like men. She has a lot of tattoos, is muscular and athletic. She does a lot of dominating. She also is in at least a few of the scenes with straight couples. I don’t think this site has as broad appeal as its sister site TS Pussy Hunters, but it’s still a very good site. There are no solo videos on it. All scenes are hardcore. When combined with TS Pussy Hunters and Divine Bitches those three sites are what makes Kink a great network for me. |
|
10-06-20 12:10am
Replies (0)
|
Review
79
|
Nubile Films
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Softer version of hardcore sex.
Nearly 750 gorgeous models. The guys are alright.
Currently 1,206 scenes with excellent video quality and photos.
Blend of niches, male/female, girl/girl, some threesomes too.
CCBill is the biller.
Easy to use site despite too many ads. |
| Cons: |
Too many ads. Besides on screen ads in the members’ area they give you a full screen ad when you sign in too.
It does become repetitive since the scenes are trying very hard not to be too hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have talked about this in past reviews. I am not really into the softer hardcore porn, but there’s so much of it these days you can’t really tell what you’re getting until you join. I thought the girl/girl scenes were the best ones on this site. Most of those are more hardcore than the male/female scenes. The one redeeming quality of this type of porn is it usually has a story or tries to have a story.
They use a television episode style of listing their scenes. I don’t know how they decide when it’s a new season or if anything really changes. They are currently on season 37, episode 10. To further complicate things they have added a series or channel called Girls Only Porn and it has a different timeline. They are currently on season 1, episode 3 of it. They also have added the Fantasy of the Month which is surprisingly really good. It’s in season 1, episode 2. This month’s fantasy girl is Veronica Leal, who I do enjoy scenes of. I would guess how good this series does will be based on how well a member likes the model choice for Fantasy of the Month.
The site is large with 1,206 scenes and they are updating 3 times per week. The videos can be downloaded in 270p, 360p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. There are no scenes with 4K, but all 1,206 scenes do have the listed resolutions available for unlimited downloading. The photos can be downloaded in 3 different sizes: 5616x3744, 2000x1333 and 1200x800. These are professional level photo sets and models.
Would you like to be confused? The newest Girls Only Porn scene is listed as season 1, episode 3. Their oldest content is from 2012 and some of it is listed as Girls Only Porn. It is listed as season 1, episode 11. I don’t know why sites make decisions like that one. The oldest content has more solo content in it than the newer scenes. The solo scenes are also listed as Girls Only Porn. I think they could have made that easier to deal with by having a better search system. The scenes each have tags, but there isn’t just an easy way to search from the main page. Their advanced search is one of the more advanced ones I have seen. You can mark what tags you want to include and what you want to exclude.
It’s a good deal all-around. High quality videos and photos, pretty models, 3 updates per week and the price is good too. |
|
10-05-20 09:50pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
80
|
TGirl Network
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
29 model transsexual network.
Bailey Jay’s site is one of the best solo transsexual model sites and it’s included with new updates.
2,350+ videos on the entire network. Most are downloadable with work.
4,000+ photo sets on the entire network. All are downloadable.
If I was a little older I could say this with confidence. One of the first transsexuals to crossover into mainstream porn in a scene with a man has a solo site on this network, she is known as Vaniity and she is very feminine looking (believe the scene with a male was Peter North).
All sites can be accessed from a hub page without having to login to each. |
| Cons: |
Downloading. I will have to explain it in the bottom line. Some of the sites are simple and easy to download from. Some aren’t and some don’t seem to even let you download videos.
A lot of the sites were likely once short-lived standalone sites with very little content on them. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network appeals to me with their content of two models, Bailey Jay and Vaniity. I am not that familiar with most of the others. I do recognize Mia Isabella and a few others, but their sites are small. I think this is one of the only TS solo model networks there is and most of these models were filmed much like solo female models are. These are glamorous models. The photo sets are professional and the models are looking as pretty as possible. The videos section has solo, hardcore, non-nude, candid and toys. There are rarely more than 5 videos in any of those except solo and hardcore. It looks like someone programmed the site with the idea of having and using all these different categories then decided it was too much work.
The downloading videos issue isn’t anything to stop me from liking the site. On Bailey Jay and Vanitty’s sites you click on a video and there are clear links for HD, SD and mobile if available. You just right click those and download them. On the other models’ sites there are not any links to download. You have to click the video again and let it start playing. You can right click the video and save as -- but, only on certain videos. It does seem to depend on who the model is. I downloaded multiple videos using that method from Mia Isabella’s site. It doesn’t work on all though. There is also the problem with the bitrate on the 1080p videos. The bitrate is 30000 when it should probably be 5000 - 8000. It makes the file sizes huge. On the 720p videos the bitrate is only 3000 - 5000. I don’t know why they would multiply the bitrate 5 - 10 times the size on the 1080p videos, but it does make those useless to me.
The network is still updating, but it’s mostly Bailey Jay’s content. Vaniity has content on the network from 2004 - 2018. That is how I would advertise the site. A lot of Bailey Jay and Vaniity content, but just an average amount from the other models.
A tip on the join price. If you join through Porn Users you can join through one of the models’ sites and it’s just $24.95. You still receive the full network. If you join through the network’s site it is $35. The biller is Verotel and there are no cross sales. It’s a good network if you like Bailey Jay and Vaniity. I think a fan of either would get their money’s worth just with the large amount of content they have of each of those two. |
|
09-28-20 10:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
81
|
Bound Gods
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good-looking, athletic, naked, hung men torturing each other
Over 600 scenes, it hasn’t updated since May 2020 -- probably a pandemic issue.
Categories or tags are listed on each scene. It’s important since some of these categories and tags are very unusual like Corporal Punishment.
Scenes are long (45 minutes plus) and have stories with them.
Each scene has a video and photoset.
All 600+ scenes have 720p download with lower versions also available. |
| Cons: |
I would prefer these scenes to be more solo or maybe adding a female.
Some may not be happy with the video resolution. The newer videos’ HD version is also 720p, but with a higher bitrate than the older ones. |
| Bottom Line: |
This isn’t really the type of site I usually go for. I prefer solo men or at least scenes that involve a woman with the guys. There are exceptions and sites on this network show those exceptions. If the guys are good enough looking and are hard enough I’m willing to look over the preferences in what I’m seeing them doing. Though some of these guys do seem closer to gay than bi or straight they are almost all very masculine. That helps us ladies look at it in other ways like we are the voyeur watching instead of being involved.
It would be difficult to turn away with most of these guys. A few of these guys are commonly found on sites like this and even on sites with dominant females like Wolf Hudson who is a common star on the site Divine Bitches where women dominate men. They do a good job of incorporating a story or fantasy if you prefer to call it that. Some scenes are one or two guys with another guy tied up and they take turns masturbating him or giving him a blowjob. There are some public scenes too. Most of these scenes are filmed in a “dungeon” and it looks real. They have torture racks along the walls, whips, just about everything a good dom has in their personal dungeon. They even link to a site where you can buy the exact items you see used in the scene.
The stories are standard fare, but at least there are stories. With scenes as long as these there just about has to be a story or it would be too long to try and figure out what is going on.
The 720p videos are the largest they offer for downloads, but those are just as good as most sites’ 1080p videos when you watch them full screen. There are over 600 scenes and there is a note on the site talking about how Covid has slowed production. The newest update was in May 2020, right in line with when the pandemic was growing and becoming a bigger concern. Before the stoppage they were averaging 2 scenes per month.
The majority of the scenes are two men, sometimes three, having sex, giving each other blowjobs and torturing each other. I would like it better if they had more of the masturbation scenes even if it’s 2-3 guys masturbating each other. The schematics of any sex -- even with a female, takes away one of the best visuals for me, the hard dick. I would recommend this to gay men who are into rougher sex and play. It’s okay for straight women since these are some of the more masculine male models I have seen in porn. |
|
09-28-20 10:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
82
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Network with 21 sites included.
Good coverage of multiple genres and niches.
Update schedule is not steady, but they had 9 new scenes in August and 2 so far in September.
10,439 scenes. The scenes consist of a downloadable video and downloadable photo set.
Technical specs are high with newer videos having 4K
Good to very good production values, lighting and direction, albeit some scenes are very similar to other scenes. |
| Cons: |
The scenes, unless the scenery or setting changes, are similar. You can even look at the times of the scenes and you see a consistent 21-25 minutes pattern.
A lot of the sites are not updating.
Older videos only have 240p and 480p downloads. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am impressed with this network. They do a very good job of spreading their niches out. There are four specific anal sites on the network, two that could be considered anal (GapeLand and DP Fanatics). They have solo model sites like Aletta Ocean Empire, Blue Angel Live, Sex with Kathia Nobili and Sweet Sophie Moone. There are two sites aimed at the oral pleasure for men with Deepthroat Frenzy and Only Swallows. There also are four lesbian sites and they have two multi-genre sites with Club Sandy and Pix And Video. There is plenty of content from varying genres and niches to satisfy most viewers desires.
The only major complaint I have is the content does seem to be directed and even timed. Some of the sites have longer scenes, but the majority follow a strict order of sexual positions and do so in under 25 minutes. The updates look to be coming from 4-6 sites while the rest are not updating.
The models are very pretty to gorgeous. The male models seem to be highly professional. There isn’t much talking and there is little story to the scenes other than sex.
The amount of content is impressive with over 10,000 scenes. If the lower quality of the older scenes doesn’t bother you those are worth looking into too. The newer scenes are more plagued by the feeling they are following a flow chart.
I preferred going to each of the different sites instead of using the full network view. I liked these sites best: Cuties Galore, Footsie Babes, Anal Teen Angels and DP Fanatics. I think that shows a good example of how broad their content is in coverage of fetishes and niches.
Their update schedule doesn’t seem to follow an exact schedule. They will have a week with no updates then release new updates on back to back days. It does equal out to 9-10 new updates per month.
The network did change its focus. The older content is almost exclusively solo and lesbian with the newer content having more anal and more hardcore sex. I like either way depending on my mood. They do both styles well and sometimes I think a site like this shows why dialogue in porn isn’t as needed as we might think.
I do take some surprise from the scene names and screencap with it. One is called Sparkling and Sensual. The screencap shows a man pulling a woman’s hair with one hand and ripping at her panties with the other while she looks in pain. Another is Erotic Surprise and it has a young Asian model with a dick up her ass. Petty differences in language are good for laughing.
Overall, I liked it and would recommend it to anyone who wants more than one genre, niche or fetish. |
|
09-28-20 10:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
83
|
Ladyboy.xxx
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly solo Ladyboy site.
Nearly 2,000 scenes with 3 updates per week.
Over 750 models, the models here are either all Asian or it's close to all, a few look possibly Indian (some consider Indians to be Asian).
Site navigates well and easy join/cancel system through the site's own biller.
Advanced search is the most comprehensive search I have seen on a TS site.
Currently includes 2 other previously standalone sites which I also am reviewing. See first con. |
| Cons: |
It's more expensive than advertised. It's listed as $29.95 on TBP and Porn Users, a few other sites list it as $20.99, but no matter where you go through, the price is $36.95. I do believe it has to do with them including two very good standalone sites (Ladyboy Ladyboy and Asian American Ladyboys).
I don't like the way the site is laid out. Upon signing in you are taken to what looks like a blog. It lists comments by the owners of the site. Updates. It's too much to read through to get to the content. They do have tabs to switch to models and updates. Which is what I am used to seeing when I sign in on a site.
I reviewed the main Grooby site last month and all 3 of these I am reviewing this month are also Grooby sites. I do not think they worry about the quality of each scene or even quality of models. I really like this site a lot better than the main Grooby site, but there are scenes here that just are not appealing. |
| Bottom Line: |
Last month, I was a little negative about the main Grooby site. The Grooby sites say they were the original TS sites online and I believe that. The amount of content is not only surprising, but the amount of sites they have is too. I feel like they own half of the entire TS online porn genre. I do think it brings up the quantity/quality debate. The scenes on Ladyboy.xxx are almost all solo. There are some scenes in the older episodes with a man with the Ladyboy, but I did join for the solo scenes. The advanced search brings a different quality to this site. You can select basic choices like "dick size", if you are looking for hardcore action, you can also select that in the advanced search, there are around 50 hardcore scenes total. You can even select Ladybody with female or Ladyboy with male in the advanced search.
There really isn't any story whatsoever in the scenes. Most of the videos are under 20 minutes and just feature a solo model masturbating until orgasm. The models on this site are better overall -- to me, than on the main Grooby site. This site goes into the attraction of boobs and hard dicks. I do think this genre is as aimed at women as men or anyone that's looking for something different the average porn scene offers. There is a downside to these cuter, even prettier Asian models, there's almost no dialogue. I believe it gives the scenes a clinical feel. Someone turns the camera on, the model starts masturbating with little to no noise, she orgasms, the camera turns off. Maybe that could be attributed to how long Grooby has been in business? They have been doing it so long it's easy and they just cruise through the scenes.
I would make a direct comparison of this site to watching the girls on Nubiles.net masturbate. There does seem to be some shyness, maybe even timid and you get some scenes that while realistic, make me feel like the model is a little uncomfortable.
The quality of the videos is as good as I have seen on TS sites. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. They have photo sets for each scene that you can download in zips and they also have screenshots in zips you can download. It is very hard to fault their content. If I had a personal complaint it is a very subjective one that some of the models just aren't attractive. Is it possible that TS content maybe has a higher standard on looks than straight content? While I enjoy the TS solo sets it is because there aren't enough solo male masturbation sites. That would make it seem like I want to see masculine TS, but I don't. I want to see the most feminine looking TS. Other than that, when combining the excellent quality, easy and expansive navigation, this is a site I would recommend to any TS fan or even to straight women interested in watching a dick be masturbated. |
|
09-09-20 02:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
84
|
Devils Film
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large, multi-niche network that has a few of my favorite niches in large numbers.
7,198 scenes with a new scene added every 3-4 days.
All newer scenes have 160p - 1080p download options.
Navigation works well if you can control your clicking.
Most scenes also come with downloadable pictures.
Good streaming player if you're not interested in downloading the videos. |
| Cons: |
A lot of the non-fetish content seems generic to me.
The filter options are confusing and make it best for people who know exactly what they're looking for. |
| Bottom Line: |
Devil's Films is a porn studio that while maybe are not that known for it, are one of the best studios for fetish and alternative content. The biggest draw for me are the 147 bisexual scenes. That is bigger than many standalone bisexual sites and the content is high quality. They also are still releasing new bisexual scenes which can only be said for a few sites. There are 723 transsexual scenes too. The best part about their transsexual scenes is they have a large amount of threesomes that include a male, a transsexual and a female. You don't see that a lot anymore. There are only a few sites that I know of that have transsexuals with women. That touches on my interest in bisexual sex and adds a woman to the mix. Those close to 900 combined scenes are my main interest on Devil's Film.
They still have another 7,000 scenes for everyone else. The scenes I have watched that are not bisexual or transsexual do give me a generic feeling. Everything seems scripted, timed and logged. It doesn't mean the content is bad. It just means it's not what I'm into.
Their video quality is impressive with 1080p and down being available on nearly all their videos and the newer videos add the 4K option. The pictures are just screencaps, but they are downloadable and they do have over 200+ in nearly every set. They are not high resolution pictures.
Besides the bisexual and transsexual scenes they have a large collection of stepfamily scenes from their series, "Out of the Family", it has 857 just from that series. There are lesbian series, a hairy series, a teen series and over 350 gangbang scenes in their Devil's Gangbang series. I do believe most if not all of the models are pros. I don't know all of them, but most do look familiar.
I believe anyone trying Devil's Films should have a reason besides "porn". They cover a lot of niches and fetishes. The filter system is very useful once you get the hang of it, but until you do, there's a good chance you're going to click the wrong filter and get yourself lost in a sea of scenes. It's a large network that is really more fetish-heavy than I think most realize. Nearly a third of their scenes are transsexual, bisexual, stepfamily and gangbang. If you're into any of those you will find a lot to like and download. The downloads are unlimited as long as you join using the download option and not the streaming-only option. |
|
09-09-20 02:06am
Replies (0)
|
Review
85
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All-around excellent hardcore site.
Production values, technical quality and performances are all top notch.
858 scenes to be downloaded or streamed.
Downloadable photo set with each scene and behind the scenes photos as well.
Comes with the even better (in my opinion) Teen Fidelity site and Kelly Madison's solo site.
Scenes are typically long (30-45 minutes) and are well played out (doesn't feel as planned). |
| Cons: |
The videos autoplay when you click on each scene. They also fill your whole screen. You have to untick the box in corner of the screen to stop the full screen autoplay, but even then it still autoplays, just not full screen.
They try to appeal to everyone with their model choices and when you do that, there will always be some male and female talent the viewers don't like. One recent scene features a man completely covered with tattoos. It just depends on the viewer's feel about body modifications.
There is a download limit that doesn't bother me as much as it might others. I have been a member for 9 months (bought a year membership last year). The download limit is 15 scenes per week. I think it depends on what your interests are. It is a terribly low number that equals out to 2 scenes per day, but I have what I want from the older scenes so I don't really notice the limit. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been a member on this site for close to 9 months. I reviewed Teen Fidelity (93) awhile back and really like it. Porn Fidelity is very similar to Teen Fidelity except the scenes are not as teen focused. The husband in the duo, Ryan Madison, is featured on both sites and gets to play with the teens. There are teens (or they look like teens to me) on Porn Fidelity too. Their sites have a feeling of friendly, even comforting settings. It is as if the models are just visiting Ryan and Kelly in their home. And a porn scene breaks out.
For all the technical greatness of the site there is that pop-out full screen autoplay feature to frustrate. If you plan on scanning through the scenes make sure to put on headphones or mute the tab. There are other workarounds including extensions for your browser that will stop the video from playing, but it's best to just mute the tab. Just because Kelly and Ryan are understanding about their interest and love of sex and porn -- doesn't mean everyone's household is!
The older content should be expected to be of much lesser quality, but the oldest scenes (2003) even have 720p on most of them. The newest videos have the highest resolution download options, including -- 5K, 4K, 1080p and 720p. I think they need to slow down. I haven't even made it to 4K yet! The files are huge and should be noted. The 5K of a newer scene is 13.55 GB, the 4K is 9.07 GB, the 1080p is 4.59 GB and the 720p is 2.49 GB.
Most of these scenes start out with the male and female dressed, conversing, and it builds into a kiss. There isn't the typical rushed feel with the scenes like on most hardcore sites. The picture sets also capture this well. I wouldn't put this in a heartcore category or anything other than hardcore. Which is what makes the content good to me. It starts out like it's going to be one of those melancholy music playing scenes, then turns into a hardcore sex scene filled with passion and intensity.
I was made aware of a new download limit that only allows 15 downloads per week. This isn't something I had noticed since I have been a member for 9 months and don't have any catching up to do. I do not know if there is a different join option to get unlimited downloads, but when I first joined in my current membership it was unlimited or at the very least not as low as 2 scenes per day. I have different feelings about download limits. I was originally only streaming porn when I first started watching it. I do think 2 scenes per day is a low number, but I don't think it's a deal breaker considering they only release one new scene a week. I do think it promotes buying a longer-term membership if you're wanting to download a lot of the older scenes.
I haven't downloaded a lot from Porn Fidelity as I prefer Teen Fidelity and have every scene from it. As a package along with the Kelly Madison solo site, this is still one of the best deals in porn, especially if you value quality over quantity thanks to the download limit. |
|
09-08-20 11:09pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
86
|
Fist Flush
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Women seeing how far they can stick their fist up inside themselves, sometimes with help from others.
Small but very good collection of 78 videos. They have updated as recently as August 2020.
Easy to use site with excellent video quality.
These scenes seem to take on more of a realistic feel to them. Maybe it's just me thinking a woman wouldn't be into this unless she was really into the scene?
I have only been a member of one other fisting site and have to say these models are much prettier than the other fisting site I tried.
Epoch is the payment processor.
Every scene has at least 1080p and 720p videos. Some of the newer ones have 4K. |
| Cons: |
The scene count could be higher, but this niche is poorly represented. Supply and demand thinking?
These scenes would be some of my favorites if the models talked much or explained what is going through their minds when somehow shoving their fist up their pussy and their other fist up their ass. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site was a pleasant surprise for me. As someone that works (sometimes) in sexual therapy, I can understand the need and use of extreme masturbation. Some of the content here goes into extremes I haven't seen one woman do to herself like the scenes with a woman fisting her pussy with one hand and ass with the other. Besides being extreme stretching in a relative area, it takes a lot of flexibility to pull that off.
I would like to see more of the solo scenes in this niche. There are less than 10 of the 78 videos here with a solo model. I can see the attraction, possibly the "heat of the moment" to be fisted when with another person, but the solo ones are as graphic and explicit as any porn. These scenes add draw even more interest with the pretty models. I am not saying this to be offensive, but I thought this was a niche more for the average or below looking models. I do not believe the low video count is a problem. That is combined with how pretty the models are. You just aren't going to find a lot of videos of very pretty models fisting themselves and each other. I talked about being a member on another site featuring fisting. I did not download any videos from it as I thought the models were unattractive. I will download at least half of the videos from this site.
The video quality couldn't be much better. Their oldest scenes all have 1080p, 720p and a few other smaller options including mobile, while the newer scenes offer 4K too.
This is a niche that I don't believe can be faked. There is a lot of realism in these scenes, very clear orgasms with some squirting too. While I do prefer the solo ones for the pure kinkiness of it, some of the scenes with two models also reach that high level of kinkiness. There are scenes where one model is fisting the other and starts giving her oral too while fingering her ass. I am thinking, "What more could she even do to her?" There are even cute moments when one model has a hard orgasm and you can see her laugh or smile like it embarrassed her. This was an overlooked site for me. It hits a happy medium between too kinky and not kinky enough. I thoroughly enjoyed it. |
|
09-08-20 11:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
87
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Varied network that draws from being the darker side of 21 Sextury
Currently has 4,491 scenes available across its 15 sites
Large collection of older/younger content with over 1,500 scenes between 3 sites.
All videos are downloadable and come with downloadable photo sets.
Covers multiple fetishes including pissing, speculum, fisting, femdom, transsexuals and even has some amateur content.
Newer videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p and down to 180p resolutions available. |
| Cons: |
They have a very broad selection of models on this network. On their site Lusty Grandmas, there are some that look 40-45, and some that look 70-75. They aren't kidding about the extreme part.
Most of the models are professionals and you do get the "too professional" feel from some of the scenes, especially the fisting ones.
Slow download speeds on older videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have an interest in the older/younger niche and reviewed several older/younger sites awhile back. I developed a recent interest in fisting and thought this network does a good job of covering multiple fetish niches.
The old/young sites are Lusty Grandmas, Grandpas Fuck Teens and Old Young Lesbian Love. These sites by themselves are worth a join. Most of the older/younger sites I joined had 200-300 scenes. These 3 sites have over 1,500. I usually prefer older woman with younger men, but believe the Grandpas Fuck Teens is the best of those three. You also can get your femdom/bondage/rough sex fix in with Mighty Mistress, Dominated Girls and Mandy is Kinky. The Zoliboy site has a combination of softcore and hardcore. Teach Me Fisting is a good, not great, fisting site that has other women helping the model learning to fist.
The quality is very good. Some of these sites haven't been updated for years, but most of the videos have a minimum of 720p and the newer ones have the 160p to 4K options. You have to go back to the oldest content to find videos with only 480p and 540p download options. In the cons I listed the download speeds on the older files. I was downloading a scene from Speculum Plays (2007) and it was only downloading at 1/6 my normal downloading speed. I haven't noticed it on all the sites in the network, but Speculum Plays does download slowly.
There is also a pissing and blowjob site rolled into one. There is an amateur site which looks out of place. The transsexual site looks like scenes taken from old DVDs.
I get the feeling this network was a bigger deal years ago. To me it felt more like I joined for the 3 older/younger sites and got a strange hodgepodge of sites thrown in. Speculum Plays is a better site than I expected since I am usually not into the gynecology sites. It has more of a the doctor is going to finger and masturbate the pretty girls instead of really showing much for a gynecology student to learn from.
This is a large network with over 1,200 models and close to 4,500 scenes. The older/younger sites they have are worth a 90. The other sites didn't interest as much. The fisting site is maybe too hectic and tries too hard to be extreme. The dom content is like a Kink-light. It's worth a join for those that are into older/younger, but I'm not for sure I could recommend it to anyone else unless they just joined for a month. |
|
09-08-20 10:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
88
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Highly recommended site for female viewers and males too.
Great video quality and photosets. Downloadable with no limits.
280 scenes with a new update each week.
Includes access to the excellent Pure CFNM network.
Newer scenes have the females being more involved. Is more like Jerk Off Encouragement now.
CCBill for easy billing and cancellation. |
| Cons: |
Older scenes were trying too hard to complete the Lady Voyeurs title with the females being in the distance or background.
Not for sure I agree with the females staying clothed. They do not in all scenes and the scenes with nude females are the best to me. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been a member of Pure CFNM in the past. I thought the overall content of the network was excellent, but my favorite content was on the Pure CFNM site. Lady Voyeurs would seem like the perfect site for me. One of my favorite parts of porn is watching the man masturbate. That is what Lady Voyeurs is. I do not know if their producers limited how much the females could do, but it was rare to see a female even look more than interested in the nude male masturbating. The newer scenes have the females teasing the male, some even taking all their clothes off and touching themselves while they watch.
It is probably the most untapped market in porn. Even with the improvements to Lady Voyeurs they could make subtle changes to it to improve it. I even think they could let the female give the guy a few strokes to get him going and maybe even let her offer more if he performs well. It does not have to go into degradation or humiliation. I even prefer the word, encouragement. Like she so excited she cannot stop herself from wanting to see him cum.
The scenes are short and it makes me wonder if that is because some of the females are better at the teasing and showing more to the guy. I do not know how exciting or arousing it would be for a guy to know a woman in the dark was watching him masturbate compared to one in the light, taking her clothes off and asking for his cum. It seems like that would work better. I would estimate the average video is only 10-12 minutes. The women’s reaction to the cum is an arousal point. Those reactions seem very genuine.
The videos can be downloaded in a trailer, 480p, 720p and 1080p. I do not think trailers are very useful for this site since you have to watch the whole scene to see how involved the female becomes.
The network as a whole has 1,457 scenes and I would not be surprised if a fan of CFNM downloaded at least half of those scenes. I am scoring Lady Voyeurs for their noticeable improvement and believe the network itself is at least a 95. |
|
08-12-20 12:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
89
|
Next Door Male
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Possibly the biggest solo male site.
Most of the guys are masculine enough to appeal to straight women.
Over 500 solo videos on this site, the number could be higher, but I’m not watching every scene to see if another man slips in later in the scene.
Newer videos have up to 1080p – but no 4K.
Easy site to use and download from. Works with free download manager.
Photos that can be downloaded, but I don’t look at the photos. |
| Cons: |
Some of the guys just are not going to appeal to straight females. I’m only mentioning that because the title of the site, “Next Door Male” has nothing in it to show that it’s a gay model site.
The last update was 6/11/2019
Video quality matches the site’s inconsistency. This site has scenes covering a 15 year period. It doesn’t look like anything has been remastered. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the best site on the Next Door Studios network – if you are a straight woman. The whole theme is solo men. I’m going to say the majority of these men could be believable straight men. There is a whole “tough guy” or maybe it’s a military vibe with the guys. I’m not American so I’m basing that on stereotypes. There are a lot of tattooed guys. Short hair, muscular physiques, not a lot of really big dicks, so I guess they are really going for the “guy next door” look with their models.
The scenes show one of the weaknesses of solo men porn. They aren’t trying to tease the viewer, they aren’t talking much, they are just trying to cum as fast as possible.
I do like that the scenes are filmed in different houses/rooms, and it makes it look like these guys just showed up at home and decided to record themselves masturbating. One solo men site I was on had the men all using the same room and couch to masturbate on. It was like being a fly on the wall of a sperm clinic.
I listed over 500 solo scenes in the pros. The number is closer to 600, but as mentioned, I am not watching them all from start to finish to make sure there’s not another guy in some of the scenes.
The one part that is a concern is the video quality. This took awhile and might not be exact, but in 2012 they added 1080p. That is only about 1/3 the total videos. The other 2/3 were before 2012. Those either top out at 720p or 480p.
I think with this niche and seeing that it’s no longer updating, you have to take what you can get and not complain too much. I don’t think they can add much personality to the scenes since the created “masculinity” might not hold up as well. Besides tattoos, beards, there are UFC posters on the walls in some scenes and most of the guys are “hairy”. I have learned enough about gay porn trying to find solo men scenes that I know this more masculine look is a niche in gay porn.
The scenes give very little to talk about other than a man sits down or stands in front of a mirror and starts masturbating. It’s a very good site and network if that sounds like something you would like. |
|
05-18-20 10:25pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
90
|
Bound Men Wanked
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Site within the Submissed network. Femdom, but is not very rough and often has sex in the scenes.
Good quality videos and consistency in the scenes.
Most guys would love to be “humiliated” like this!
Very attractive models both female and male.
Includes 6 other sites that are BDSM themes; I would say it is a little tamer than Kink – but is still good.
Should appeal to both male and female viewers. |
| Cons: |
Like nearly all sites with this broad appeal, it has stopped updating
38 scenes on this site, the network has over 700. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first con is the biggest pro/con to this site. This really seems like a site that should appeal to both males and females. While there is light domination by the females, many of the scenes lead to the woman giving the man the sex she’s keeping from him. There is even some role-reversal with the guy taking more control. Most of the scenes do seem like something you would see on Kink’s network and part of the reason is, Kink has some of these scenes in their cross-advertising. I was expecting more scenes, but I’m learning quality over quantity.
The videos can be downloaded in 480p, 720p and 1080p. You can also download photos.
There’s no real pain or humiliation from the scenes I’ve watched. All scenes are male with female. Both seems to thoroughly enjoy the scenes. Surely there are men that would love to be tied up to a chair while a beautiful woman gives him a handjob?
You also get the added tension of how far the woman will let him go. Some of the women do seem to become so turned on by their role of dominance they give in and that’s something – I think, most BDSM sites don’t have enough of. It’s hard to believe a woman who is half naked with a guy groping her with his tied hands wouldn’t become aroused herself.
The closest the scenes get to humiliation involve a guy in something like a pet metal kennel and a woman leading a nude man around with a chain around his neck. There are scenes with ball gags in the guy’s mouth and even duct tape over the guy’s mouth.
Even though I enjoy the entire network it’s this site that is the enigma. The last update was October 30, 2019. This would be one of my favorite sites if it had more scenes and/or was still updating. The network adds more value and includes the sites: Ball Gagger, Femdum, Hogtied Up, Machine Dom and Sub Amateur. |
|
04-19-20 01:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
91
|
Couples Fantasies
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A near perfect site for me. Couples living out their fantasies with each other.
Touches on nerves and hormones that most porn doesn't ever get close to.
Four downloadable video options, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 1920p.
I would have paid $15 for the 11 scenes on this site and been very happy about it. Instead, you get this site and 19 more.
Very attractive male and female actors.
I have watched each scene multiple times and probably will keep doing so. A site with this type of content being produced regularly would get me to join it on a lifetime membership. |
| Cons: |
Only 11 scenes. I know that's bad and maybe it will make my score look bad, but I have watched these 11 scenes more than the 500 I have on my hard drive.
Doesn't look like they will be updating it anymore, last update was in 2017.
The actors inability to speak English removes most of the bad acting and causes their actions to speak for them. |
| Bottom Line: |
The premise of these scenes is simple. There's a male/female couple and one of them has a fantasy or they both have the fantasy. Since there are only 11 scenes and I know there are people that want porn like this, I'm going to go over a few of them.
My Wife Wants to Squirt
The husband and wife invite in a third woman to teach the wife how to squirt. She starts with fingering the wife with the fully clothed husband watching. As the wife starts having orgasm(s), the husband walks over and pulls his dick out and starts jacking-off. The wife squirts, he cums and some of his cum even hits the woman assisting his wife.
Furtive Fingering By A Stranger
It's the fantasy us women like to say is not real. The shop owner Tiffany Doll is awaiting a package. I believe they are speaking Spanish or Portuguese. There was a man in the shop. Because I don't understand the language, I don't know if he was her husband or boyfriend. After he leaves, the delivery man brings a package and she's clearly attracted to him. They kiss deeply, he pushes her up on a counter, reminding yourself this is supposed to be a business anyone could walk in and he fingers her very hard, she even opens her shirt and bra. This is what makes these scenes different. She never touched his dick. There's no actual sex other than the fingering. It gives the realistic feel to the fantasy. He walks out of the shop like nothing happened.
One more is Turn Her On.
Male/female couple are attracted to a younger woman and they see her masturbating. The husband tells his wife to seduce her. They end up in a wild threesome.
This is the type of content I was first introduced to porn with. Vivid used to have this type of content and still do in the archives. It's the type of content that makes you wonder what you would do, it has a natural -- in the heat of the moment, feel to it.
The rest of the score comes from it being on a very good network with 19 other sites besides it. They seem to explore several areas of fantasies on their sites. I would compare the content to Pretty Dirty and Pure Taboo, it's porn that does more than just physically arouse you.
I will add a lot of the stepfamily type porn also touches on similar nerves and hormones, but I find these more believable since they are saying "this is a committed couple and in the heat of the moment they agreed to do something committed couples usually don't." Maybe one day someone will make more content like this. Until then, I'll hope I don't wear my 11 videos out! |
|
02-17-20 11:02pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
92
|
Sis Loves Me
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Team Skeet Standalone/Premium site that is excellent.
209 scenes with 6-7 updates per month.
Cute models, mostly teen, but some older ones.
Long scenes, some as long as an hour, stories that are usually corny, but fun.
Video quality whether streaming or downloading is top-notch, up to 1080p, with 720p, 480p and mobile available.
Each scene has a full-length video, trailer, photos and screencaps, and they are downloadable.
The biller is Epoch. |
| Cons: |
Is very similar to their site Family Strokes which I'm also currently a member of. I like both sites equally.
Some might not like the silly stories.
Model list defaults to the model list for the Team Skeet network instead of just showing the models on Sis Loves Me. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have tried joining a couple of these Team Skeet standalone sites over the last 4-6 weeks. I enjoy the scenes with a story and some dialogue. While the writing isn't going to blow you away, it's more than adequate and the quality of models helps. It feels like they have hit on a sweet spot where they have found models who do not look like they're failing at acting, but are just kind of airheaded and it makes the scenes more believable.
This is one of the biggest standalone/premium sites Team Skeet has with 209 scenes and 6-7 updates per month. The scenes don't offer a big story shift from scene to scene. It's usually either the brother catching his stepsister masturbating and he joins her or she catches him masturbating and joins him until they're having sex.
The video quality is very good. Their streaming player is one of the better ones I've used. I experience minimal buffering. The files are very large since the scenes are so long. A few I have downloaded were over 5 Gigabytes for the 1080p versions.
The picture sets are studio type pictures not screencaps, but they also offer the screencaps too. The trailers can be useful if you prefer certain positions. They have a tagging system that I think has too many tags to be very useful.
Some of the scenes to give you an idea of what the content is like are Stepsister Snatch Stash, which is one of the hottest scenes on the site featuring Indica Flower, Sneaking Around With Sis and An Unexpected Mouthful of Cum. The scenes all have the "oops, look what I walked up on" moment. I find the content to be entertaining throughout the site.
Epoch is the biller and they have a Paypal option, but as others have mentioned some of these Paypal options only allow a Mastercard, this is one of those.
I think they should stick to making porn like these scenes and their other standalone sites. At some point, hot and sexy, even gets stale. A little humor and even silliness makes this content fun to watch, then it gets hot and sexy.
An excellent site and the amount of content, though not large, is worth the price. About 60% of the content I've downloaded over the last 4 months has been from these Team Skeet standalone/premium sites. |
|
11-12-19 12:16am
Replies (1)
|
Review
93
|
Oye Loca
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the sexiest sites I have seen. Especially for amateurs.
It has 256 scenes and despite not set update schedule they seem to average a couple scenes per month.
The scenes come with a video, photos and screencaps, all are downloadable.
One of the few times that I felt the models are more important to the scenes than the sex. There's just something really sexy and seductive about this content.
Content is exclusive. |
| Cons: |
It needs more updates.
This is a different con, I would like to see the scenes stay in the foreplay area longer. The kissing, touching, oral sex in these scenes is the some of the best I've seen, but they don't stay in that area long enough. |
| Bottom Line: |
I hadn't looked much at this site, but decided to a few weeks ago and I felt like I have missed out on something. The sexuality and sensuality in these scenes is very high.
Some of these women shouldn't even have sex. They should just move around, stripping, making eye contact, moving their tongues across their lips and I think the guys would be finished before the sex started. I could be wrong about these being amateurs as they don't act like amateurs. These models could teach most pro porn models a thing or two about being seductive.
My biggest two complaints are that the women get naked too fast and there's not enough foreplay. These women in clothes and stripping and worth paying to see. The foreplay, especially the kissing, these models seem so passionate and even filled with lust.
The sex is kind of a letdown compared to the build-up to it.
There are 256 scenes and it doesn't look like they ever had an established schedule of release. I guess they film in South America and must just upload content as they film it?
I can see why this site has been scored high on a consistent basis. It's an easy to use site, the scenes come with videos, photos and screencaps, there's not much story to the scenes, but that's the whole point of my review. If you like foreplay and sexiness in clothes, this site is really worth checking out just for those parts.
I keep telling myself and saying in reviews, "I'm not a lesbian", but the bodies on these women are about as perfect as I have seen.
I do wish they had more outdoor scenes, maybe around pools with the women in bikini cover-ups. I was going to let my membership lapse this month, but I might either stay for one more or month or try to download the majority of the scenes from this site. I think they need to push this site a little more or maybe add some step-sibling scenes to it to keep up with the times. Very good site that's worth a membership all by itself. |
|
11-05-19 12:28am
Replies (1)
|
Review
94
|
The Female Orgasm
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Something I can relate to and feel the experience -- the female orgasm.
Over 3,000 scenes of women having orgasms.
1,500 photo sets and 500+ models.
I signed up thru CCBill
The scenes are impersonal, which I think is a good thing in this niche. You won't feel like you know the model any better after the scene as you did before the scene.
Variety of sex toys used |
| Cons: |
It says I have access to 3 bonus sites. Each time I try to sign into those bonus sites it says my login is invalid. There is a message scrolling across the screen that says the bonus sites had been down, but are back up. They're not for me.
The scenes are extremely short. I have seen some of as short as 1 minute.
Could use better camerawork with close-ups |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined several of these real orgasm, feeling myself sites to do a comparison of them. The first point to make is I believe all of these women are having real orgasms.
I don't believe the site is getting the most out of the scenes. With varying degrees of orgasms, levels, they could have these models go for more than one small one, which is what a lot of the scenes are. I have watched maybe 30% of the scenes and would say more than 50% are minor orgasms.
Most women I know do not stop at the minor orgasm. That's when they are just really get turned on and very wet. Some of the scenes are longer (10 minutes plus) and those do seem to go for the deeper orgasms. It's very believable masturbation from start to finish and that's what the site is selling.
I think they could do more by having more of the scenes where the women use a vibrator or Magic Wand over their pants or panties. They do have some of those scenes and those are the best ones.
What I believe the main criticism is these women look like they showed up to masturbate. Everything is in place from the camera to the noise levels in the background and they are primed and ready to go. That is not realistic. When a woman gets the urge to masturbate she might go to a restroom in public or she might go to a friend's house and use their restroom. She might be taking a shower then the urge hits thanks to the shower massager. There's no feeling of spontaneity.
It's not a big complaint since they don't advertise themselves as having spontaneous masturbation. It just makes the scenes linger in that area of formulaic and clinical. The scenes that do break this pattern are the ones listed as "from the web". I will assume those are user submitted. Those are the shortest ones, but often are the most erotic, as they look like the woman had been masturbating well before the camera was turned on and just the orgasm is recorded.
I haven't watched enough porn to know if these women are regular porn stars or amateurs. I do recognize Jenny Mendez. Her scenes are some of the best on here. She starts out rubbing her clitoris and reaching the minor orgasm, then uses a Magic Wand or dildo to reach full orgasm.
The camerawork is a complaint I normally wouldn't make. I usually don't even notice the camerawork. There needs to be more zoom on the orgasms to show contractions and secretions. I do get the feeling the site is going for a more amateur feel to the scenes, but they are losing some of the best parts by keeping the camera at the same distance.
They could be an advertisement for the Magic Wand as that is the one the women are getting off with fastest. Which in my experience is also true.
They videos are good quality. I usually am more of a streamer than downloader. The download options on the newer scenes have full HD and HD and two smaller options, presumably for mobile devices.
The picture sets show more of what the videos should show. The women touching themselves in their clothes. It would take away the feeling that they are just there to see how fast they can orgasm.
I am not going to do a direct comparison to the other sites since I have not reviewed them yet, but I do like this site. I'm not a lesbian, but I can appreciate watching a pretty, young woman reach orgasm on camera. You will see a lot of thighs shaking, calves flexing and toes curling, continuing the belief these are real orgasms. Maybe there is some jealousy on the short ones? An orgasm in 3 minutes? How much more efficient my days would be if I could pull that off.
I would even like to see them add some sort of simulation for the woman. Maybe a screen of a porn playing that she's watching or just bring average guys in to sit and watch her. It needs a little something more added to it to be the very best of this niche. Not that I know if any of these types of sites actually do that. I have a feeling they don't.
It's more enjoyable to me than the mainstream sites where you can tell the director is telling the model to move a certain way to get her better side or better parts into the video. The moans are more realistic as well.
I haven't seen many that went to their limit and that's what I would like to see on a site like this. Yes, she had a minor orgasm at 3 minutes in and then a full orgasm at 9 minutes in, but let's see her go for one more and make a complete mess of herself and the sheets, bed or whatever she is sitting on.
I like the site a lot and could see myself coming back. Hopefully, they will get the bonus site access fixed. They update with 1 video everyday and a photo set every few days. Very happy with this site as a whole and hope they continue to improve it. |
|
09-10-19 02:26am
Replies (2)
|
Review
95
|
Wet And Pissy
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Updates added once a week
The site has almost 550 videos and photosets
Uses a great many tags for searching
All the scenes are exclusive
Comes with four other sites
Videos can be downloaded in eight options and the most recent include 4K |
| Cons: |
Some of the tags are confusing
The site layout needs improving. The non-member tour is easier to use than the member's area. It's the same content from the tour but they have it laid out in a way that becomes confusing. |
| Bottom Line: |
When I was living in India, I developed a fetish for pissing. We don’t have the best public hygiene and seeing a man urinating outdoors is not uncommon. For women, this would be extremely taboo and pretty much unimaginable. Although this site has its main concept of seeing women pissing, it is done indoors and as a kind of surrogate for sex. The women see pissing as a sex act in a way. I think it is fair to say that the pee is treasured as if it were a man’s cum and makes these women do things with it that help them reach orgasm. Well, maybe I should say a porn fake orgasm as these women are all acting out a fantasy and do it for a paycheck. These are stars I have seen before on other sites and even on the other four sites within the Puffy Network that is included with your membership.
The women are for the most part, pretty and thin Eastern European models that don’t talk. Instead, their actions speak for them. They play to the camera and seem to be acting out what a director is looking for them to do more than out of any spontaneous passion. That makes me feel a bit left out of the scene as I would have preferred that they were a bit more original and believable. For me the best pissing videos are showing a forbidden act. For the site the women see themselves as putting on a show for men who want to see pissing acts that are a lot more than just a biological relief.
One example of that is when you click on the models list, you get thumbnails of their faces as you would expect, but you also get a picture in picture smaller shot of their pussy with piss coming out. There seems to be a desire for acts that are striking visually and are in their own way a bit extreme. For the most part you get stripping and showing off her body, just like most male focused porn and then a bit of toys, dildos, etc. to get her in the mood or you see her pissing and doing all kinds of things with the piss. She drinks it, pours it over herself, licks it up from the floor, pees in her clothes and then squeezes the piss into her mouth or licking toys covered in piss.
The tags are extensive and many of them are perfect for the niche. Sometimes I felt overwhelmed by how many there are and was confused by the differences between them. Sometimes the tags felt overlapping and maybe even redundant. You can see for yourself as these are just a few and I don’t think this is even close to a complete list of the tags that are piss focused. Clothed pissing, clothing mopping, golden shower, licking up piss, licking toys, peeing, piss drinking, piss play, pissing, pissing during insertion, pissing in glass, pissing in pants, pissing on self, piss spitting, pussy wash, standing pee, sucking on clothing, wet and messy, watersports, wet, wet hair, wet toy, wet panties.
This is a shortened description of one of the better scenes. Keira stands up before she starts pissing into her panties. Her stream trickles through the fabric and her denims, then strips out of them to mop up her pee from the floor using her panties. Squeezing her piss in the panties into her mouth, she climbs up onto the table and fingers her pussy. She gushes all over the table, then leans over, lapping up her pee. Next, she holds a glass vase underneath her and pees right into it before pouring it into her mouth and all over her face, going down her body. She uses her fingers as she brings herself to orgasm.
The videos have as many as eight download options including 4K and there are two for the photo sets, which are not worth bothering with. Updates come once a week and the archive is huge for a specialized fetish site with about 550 videos. Not only are all the scenes exclusive, I can’t think of any pissing site I can compare it to. |
|
11-10-21 12:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
96
|
Zebra Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with the entire Dogfart network consisting of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
I noted this based on past reviews, I believe they have started updating this interracial lesbian site again.
88 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
137 female models on this site.
Updates once per month. |
| Cons: |
They have definitely had some downtime when it comes to updating. The site’s first scene was posted in 2007 and they only have 88 scenes total.
The 4K versions of the newer videos cost $4 each.
It’s another of their sites that seems to get a lot of positive comments from their users, but they only update it once per month. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
Nia Nacci’s performance in a Cum Bang scene led to me looking for more of her content. I rarely search out specific women, but her performance brought out the “best” in the men. It seems she does just as well with women as the newest scene on Zebra Girls is Nia Nacci with Kyler Quinn. The site sticks with the interracial format which I would think would be easy to book models for.
The scenes are standard lesbian scenes with oral, anal licking, nipple sucking, kissing, strap-ons and maybe the interracial part is something I don’t really notice as a native of India. I’m kind of in-between the colors. The scenes are good. There’s not a lot of creativity especially in the older scenes, but the newer scenes not only add creativity, they also are longer scenes too. The newest scenes are closer to 40 minutes, while the older ones are 20-25 minutes. The same problem with the video quality is on this site too. There are older scenes that say HD, but are only 480p, with a few being 720p. There’s the $4 charge for 4K scenes. I have a 4K monitor now and would like to see that Nia Nacci with Kyler Quinn scene in 4K, but $4 is nearly ⅓ what I paid for the full membership.
This site along with Cum Bang, We Fuck Black Girls and Gloryhole Iniations are easily my favorite sites on the network. Of those four they deliver a total of 4 updates combined per month. While Blacks on Blondes gets 4 updates per month just on it. This site would interest me as a standalone site if they updated it more often. Maybe they should look into trying that similar to how Team Skeet does? They could even add 4K videos and charge $15 per site. It’s a good, nearly great site on a network that’s treading water to stay above average. |
|
02-26-21 06:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
97
|
All Fine Girls
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There is a promo of pay for one month and you get another for free.
You also get three other similar sites. If you like this one, you will like the others.
The site has been active since 2006, so you get 2250 videos and 2700 photo sets. Of course there are many older videos that are not Full HD or 4K.
The download speeds I got surprised me. I didn’t think I could download this fast.
As user friendly a site as any I have ever been a member of. |
| Cons: |
The last update was in December 2021. Is it still updating?
There is not much variety in the types of models. Fantasy level gorgeous models are fine, but could some be a little less perfect?
I think about the videos when I am at work. I keep telling myself that I have a job to do. |
| Bottom Line: |
So many times sites don’t deliver what they promise. This one is the opposite as the quality is much better than I ever expected from a porn site. Before I get into that, there are a few things here that I did expect. The women are Eastern European, so most of them are quite thin. They are quiet in nearly every scene. Unfortunately, the ethnic, age and body type diversity you might get in American porn is just not there. They also have some very recognizable Euro stars who are in many scenes. Apolonia La Piedra has 26 scenes, Gina Gerson has 173, Lady Dee has 7 and Alexis Crystal 96. However there are hundreds of models and most are described as in their first scene or first time with a girl. The awkwardness and natural freshness makes these scenes see very real and unrehearsed.
About half the scenes are described as solo. These were by far my favorites as I felt they allowed the models the opportunity to feel comfortable with letting their sexual sides come out and do so in a eye catching, imaginative and up close and intimate way. You may well guess that most of them are masturbation, but many delightfully naughty scenes featured them as they did yoga, stretched, exercised, danced, or had a fashion show theme, as they changed clothes. There were even some super hot non nudes with teasing.
In the lesbian scenes, I could easily see some awkwardness that was to be expected as many were advertised as first time lesbian sex. But that same awkwardness made for a lot of natural heat that comes from letting out sexual inhibitions and emotions. It came across as that for these models this was a forbidden fantasy that they had thought about, dreamed about, that they had now made real. For us women, finding other women sexy is very natural. If a woman enjoys doing her scene with a partner of either sex, I can identify with her and feel the rhythm as the tension mounts. There was a little bit of toy use, but mostly the scenes had some very passionate romantic kissing on both sets of lips. Part of young innocents exploring is discovering what does or does not work sexually.
In the heterosexual scenes there was oral sex with men in nearly every scene who were about the same age. There was a feeling that the women had fun and the guys were attentive and not so big or rough that there was a question about how the women felt. They liked these guys and the guys seemed to like them. I felt that I could have been watching real couples exploring each other’s bodies. The guys let the women take control of the action and the focus was on female natural beauty. I thought the guys were rather plain and not really all that memorable. This is all Fine Girls after all and women have the spotlight.
I think that there is a lot here to appeal to women. I think guys would like how well the women are showcased and presented. Many sites make the women look glamorous and classy, but in contrast here they just seem oh so pretty and accessible. These are women you might meet and wonder how they look under their clothes or what sex with them would be like. I find a strong appeal to my imagination.
The site is really well laid out and is very simple to use. The video quality is among the best with much of it in 4K, but the site has a banner that says they are remastering some videos to 6K. Wow. I don’t feel a need for that at this time, but you know technology gets cheaper and cheaper the longer it is available. While I am happy with Full High Definition 1080p today, I expect that one day that would be considered inadequate, even old fashioned. If someone makes porn in 6K or better, someone will eventually be buying a new television to watch it on for less than the one I have today. The women are already beautiful, but what will the future technology add to the experience?
You also get three other similar sites that make this a site I would rejoin. For now they are running a sale of pay for one month and get another month for free. |
|
03-20-22 10:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
98
|
4K CFNM
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of Adult Prime, it’s a newer site on the network and has potential.
Only 41 scenes with 1 new update per month, but considering how little supported this niche is, it’s a decent-sized collection.
All scenes available in up to 4K downloads.
Large contrast in attractiveness/age/body type of females and males. Not for sure that’s a big positive for me, but variety does make the niche interesting. It will be explained.
Though the genre is clothed female, the females don’t always stay clothed and that’s my favorite part of CFNM in porn. That also works as a con for some according to past replies to my CFNM reviews. |
| Cons: |
I don’t believe everyone will find some of these females very attractive. It is an important part of the theme’s angle, to me, but judging a book by its cover isn’t going to help some of these scenes.
The scenes are too short. I can understand about it being a newer site (low total of scenes), but the scenes are also very short (under 15 minutes).
Needs better pictures especially in scenes with more than 2 people. Short videos plus 4-5 models including the male means very little camera time for everyone in the scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
CFNM porn was one of the first genres I developed a fetish for. This site is kind of on the right track. They have high quality downloads of their videos including 720p, 1080p and 4K. There is a good blend of body types, ages from both the females and males. There is the added preference of mine of not every scene sticking strictly to nude female and not every scene only being a handjob. The biggest problem is the length of the scenes. I believe nearly anyone can get around unattractiveness if the fetish is strong enough. The amount of scenes and unattractiveness of some of the models will push those not that into the fetish away.
The reason I like the different looks, ages, body types is this is a pure lustful act. It is part of what hooked me on the genre when I first watched a CFNM scene. The general thinking would be the woman is so aroused by the nude male she doesn’t even take time to take her clothes off before giving him pleasure. In one of the most humorous replies, I have received about CFNM porn, a Porn User that only watches gay porn, told me, “I didn’t think about the fetish part of it. I just didn’t want to see the woman naked!” That’s an all-time classic. That is the allure of CFNM for most women. It is a woman drawn by the erect dick. She’s out of control and just has to at least play with it. Her clothes staying on represents she gets enough pleasure from his pleasure. She doesn’t even need him to touch her. That is something the genre has trouble sticking with. It could be the producers are not aware of the real fetish or it could be the females maybe need to get naked and touched to complete the scene. This genre is one of those where you will scenes that drag if the scene is very long. It’s boredom in the female. Those lose the fetish faster than the woman taking her clothes off. There is a CFNM network that sticks close to the CFNM part. As much as I like the fetish, I do prefer that some of the scenes turn into the female removing at least some of her clothes and also seeing more than just handjobs. I really want to believe these guys do not get off in 9 minutes from a clothed woman handjob. If you’re not careful with that, it ruins all other porn for you. You see the same guy in a full sex scene, and it takes him 45 minutes to get off. That’s getting into too complex. Why take 45 minutes while getting everything has to offer including nudity, but only take 9 when she leaves her clothes on and just uses her hand?
I believe this genre could have a brighter future. If we see more female involvement in porn production, I can see it taking off and becoming very popular even. I do believe the attractiveness of the female will be a make or break point. The women on this site some of them look at least 50s and they’re not the prettiest women in their 50s. There are some BBW models on this site. I don’t know if my mind just doesn’t compute all of that, but that seems like pushing the limit. I do think the older and even BBW models work well with very young, 18-21 year old, male models. It looks more like her seduction convinces him to close his eyes during the act.
The site is small and it’s going to take awhile to grow. It has 41 scenes. The updates are one per month. I do like that a lot of the scenes are outdoors or look like passable as public restrooms or locker rooms. That is where this genre can be complicated. A woman sitting on her couch giving a nude guy a handjob. Is just not selling the fetish for me. If you’re there at your house, why wouldn’t it turn into more? That is the other part of the fetish. By putting the scenes outside or what looks like a public location you add the feeling of they just saw each other and had to have each other.
I still don’t think I can complain that much. I am almost positive only one other CFNM site or network is updating today. If there’s a webmaster out there that has one and is updating, let me know. This is one of my favorite genres and it’s why I call it a fetish. It’s a good site to check out if you have an Adult Prime membership. I don’t know if I would tell people new to this genre that this is a good representation of the genre. Hopefully, my review even helps understand the fetishes that this genre can include. |
|
02-08-22 07:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
99
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Even with few recent updates and possibly a bleak future, it’s still one of if not the best transsexual with women site.
A large collection of 327 scenes that should be a starting point for any female interested in this niche.
The scenes are long and most have a separate theme from transsexual with female. There Is bondage, BDSM and even sex toy use.
All scenes have 720p as the largest resolution download. The one new update as 1080p. There are also smaller resolutions available.
Not all, but many of the scenes have the best part of transsexual with women porn. You have to watch the scene to see which one is the female and which is the transsexual. The preview picture often doesn’t show much difference.
There are photo sets and those can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
This may sound weird, but the more masculine transsexuals don’t look right with the female models.
I’m holding onto hope that Kink will continue to produce this content, but it has been 5 months since the last update. |
| Bottom Line: |
Just like I believe transsexuals with females is the way to make transsexual porn more acceptable to straight men, it is what first attracted me, a straight female, to transsexual porn. A site like TS Pussy Hunters does, in my opinion, appeal to a larger market than all other niches in porn. You do have to think deeply to see that, but it’s there. The feminine transsexuals could be attractive to lesbians (boobs, pretty faces). Any of the transsexuals could be attractive to straight women and gay men (hard dicks in action). The female in the scene is attractive to straight men and it’s still a dick going in the woman. I don’t see a group that would be 100% against it.
Unlike TS Seduction, Kink’s other transsexual site, I feel like TS Pussy Hunters improved over time. It didn’t start until 2012. Some of the newest scenes are in my all-time favorite scenes. I would recommend the scene, “Prime Real Estate” to anyone new to the niche and interested in it. It features TS Foxy and Lotus Lain. Lotus has more of an athletic/traditional female body, hair pulled up, while TS Foxy is close to matching the feminine curves Lotus Lain has. Lotus also looks 4-5 inches taller than TS Foxy. Both are great in the scene, and I would love to see them do more scenes together. I had no interest in Lotus Lain’s scenes until seeing that one. Not to my surprise, when I searched for more of her scenes she had older scenes with men, some with women and does seem to be a very real bisexual woman. I believe you can see roles being defined in these scenes. You can tell some of the females are mostly just into the scene for the dick. Other females will be more affectionate, kissing and passionate like there are bicurious feelings being shown.
Long scenes are not always a good thing in porn, but none of these scenes feel like they’re dragging. It’s my thought, the females may need time to adjust to seeing a feminine face with a masculine reproductive organ. I could be looking too deeply into that, but it is why I like transsexuals with females porn. I try to watch and see the chemistry, the connect, the disconnect.
Even though it’s Kink, you’re not going to get a lot of craziness. Most of the scenes have a minimal theme and story to them. There’s not a lot of heavy bondage or devices used. You do get the high production values Kink is known for. I just think you have to know what they’re showing or you’re supposed to be looking for. There are scenes where the female is using a strap-on on the transsexual and you may have trouble telling which is the female. There are scenes blended in with themes from other Kink sites, including wrestling scenes with the transsexual and female wrestling for the right to be the top. This site kept me coming back to Kink for years. Hopefully, if it doesn’t continue, another site or sites will see what an underappreciated and unrepresented niche this is. |
|
02-08-22 06:01pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
100
|
Subspace Land
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large site with 454 scenes
Updating once a month, average for a very specialized niche site
All the videos are available in high definition, the most recent in Full HD
There is no mention of a download limit and I did not find one.
Serious BDSM, not play acting
Excellent tag system for easy searching
Photo sets for each video |
| Cons: |
Eerie background music. This can be a plus for some people. I kept waiting for spooky narrator
The site does not come with any other sites and no extras |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site where the men are dominant and the women love it. I has quite a few European pornstars that are well known for their sex scenes and I was pleasantly surprised to see that they are very capable as BDSM subs. I am no expert on pornstars, but I saw Nesty, Gina Gerson, Lady Dee, Nikky Thorne and my new favorite Ria Sunn. Unlike scenes where I have seen these women before, the sex is not the focus.
In many of the scenes there is no sex going on, but there is nudity and some forced use of a ribbed wand on the women to get them going. In the scenes with sex, it is generally towards the end after the rest is done. Mostly what you get are blow jobs and I am none too sure why. It seems to never be explained. It may be showing submissiveness or it may be to show gratitude for being manhandled. The sex just starts and it is what it is. No matter what the sex part is, the man seems to enjoy it and the women are doing what they can to make the man get off.
The site is obviously much more about the BDSM than the sex. Some of the models do scenes that have punishment as the theme and in some it seems that the idea of being tied up in an uncomfortable position for a long time is more the goal. The punishment is mostly whipping with a flogger that leaves her skin red. In many cases, when the scene is over the model has visible welts. When the scene is more being tied up, the rope usage can be quite creative. In those scenes there is also a lot of edging the women to make them close to orgasming. I loved that part and wish that more scenes were like that.
The outfits the women use are mostly lingerie, heels, sexy underwear and basically have a glamorous feel to them. They wear makeup to look their best. The sets look like they are in a place that is a workshop of some kind as there are many tools laying around that are not used in BDSM. Maybe they make some of the BDSM props or equipment? The lighting is often very dark, but they must have some kind of spotlight on the action. There is a contrast there of dark and light. That is BDSM in a few words, dark pain being used for pleasure. Besides that, there is no dialog, just a few grunts, moans and crying sounds. There is a soundtrack appropriate for an eerie effect, something like what you would get in a horror movie. I was thinking Vincent Price, Freddie Kruger and that kind of thing. Many scenes are outdoors and the locations are parks, mountains, and along the shore. The models lie on rocks and walk on rocky paths, so I can imagine what they are feeling even before any action takes place.
The camerawork and effects are also to be admired. The focus is where it should be and there are some split screen views of the action from two vantage points. There are a few scenes that are really BDSM as an art form. The site itself was very easy to navigate and there is an excellent tag system for searching. I had good download speeds as well. With an archive of 454 videos and such specialized content, updates once a month are fine and enough for me.
The BDSM is not for the squeamish, being very real and not play acting. Personally, It never made me feel uncomfortable as I did not find it over the top abusive. I would have liked a bit more sex, but this is a very well done site nevertheless. |
|
02-05-22 11:21am
Replies (0)
|
|
