| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
101
|
Sweethearts Classics
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Oh no, another of these sites to make me wonder if I just enjoy watching cute, young women have sex or if there’s more to it!
61 scenes of fully remastered porn that looks like it was made in the early to mid-2000s. It is updating weekly.
I don’t need navigation with these sites. I download nearly every scene. I feel like such a perverted woman.
It feels more real and believable than a lot of porn that’s out today. There’s a cheerful bliss in the young ladies’ faces.
The video quality is very good for the time period it’s from. It’s downloadable and unlimited (trust me, I would know by now if it’s not).
The scenery, a lot of these, especially the newer ones are outdoors in the snow. |
| Cons: |
It’s relatively small and I am guessing these scenes are available in non-remastered form.
The models are so cute it is almost a con. I find myself saying, “Don’t stick that in there”. I have laughed all the way through this. |
| Bottom Line: |
My real first introduction to porn was a DVD by Vivid. That is what this reminds me of without the stories. There is playfulness, an enjoyment, lots of smiles and the women are so cute and pretty. The scenery adds to it. I had not ever seen snow until I moved to the United States. It adds the pure white background, and it adds me wondering how cold they must be. I first thought what this was a new site that was filming in vintage style. It does look like these are old scenes, probably fan favorites, that have been remastered. The videos look very good. There are no pictures that I have found. Last month, I reviewed Club Sweethearts and was surprised by how much I liked it.
This site just continues that feeling, maybe a little more, with just the quantity holding it back from a higher score. I could easily see downloading all the scenes from this site. I don’t usually say something like this, but some of these models today look bad.
The one I noticed most is Jane B in the scene Latina Teen Fucking. The names of the models make me think it’s older. I have heard several of the Porn Users talk about the 2000s having the models with the generic names. I don’t think know any Latina named Jane. She is an incredible performer. These are not glamorous models. It’s minimal makeup and normal clothing for that era.
I feel like the person must feel that just discovered porn. There’s not anything that special about these scenes. I don’t know what they’re saying. There doesn’t seem to be any kind of story. There is no theme. I’m being impressed by their energy, how pretty they are and how sexy they are for what looks like at most 20 years old. I do believe the minimal makeup, the clothing of the era, adds a lot to the scenes. It makes curious to know if any of these young models went on to be big star models, but I just don’t know it. They are outperforming models with 15 years of experience. I don’t know if I’m just speechless or what. There are 61 scenes with a new update every week. It is part of the Adult Prime network. The remastered scenes can be downloaded or streamed in 540p, 720p or 1080p. They have done a very good on the remastering. I’m now even wondering how much things like room color and settings are improving the scenes for me. So many newer sites have the white room with a white bed and perfect white lighting. The one I talked about earlier, her and the guy look like they are in a beach apartment. It has yellow floors and yellow walls with some blue and orange mixed in. Me being in the mental science field, those colors could be changing the mood for me. I can’t give it as a high of a score as it deserves. I believe I would download and keep all 61 videos, but I don’t know if that is enough to score it any higher than I did. I do believe adding pictures would help. I feel dumb for saying that. If they don’t have pictures, they can’t turn back the clock on the models to look like they do in the scenes. The one scene with Jane B is enough by itself. I haven’t really experienced that with porn sites. It’s better than I was expecting. |
|
01-12-22 08:55am
Replies (0)
|
Review
102
|
Wank My Wood
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
51 fun scenes that I really liked a lot.
Very athletic looking, buff and in shape, masculine guys.
Offers 4k and 60 fps for two scenes and the rest are in 1080p at their best.
There is the ability to play the scenes in slow motion, which is great for cumshots.
Easy to use site. |
| Cons: |
Not updating
There are not enough tags, but honestly I don’t think this matters much |
| Bottom Line: |
Because of the name, I was expecting a site that was from a guy’s point of view. However, I was pleasantly surprised at how much I liked what I saw. The guys are very good looking, the kind of guy that I like to see in porn. They are masculine, buff and in shape and had nice manners. To me that is very sexy, even more than anything else that I can think of.
I could also relate to the women. They were, for the most part, natural and not play acting or overacting. The scenes start with a little dialog, but really it is just no more than a pretext. I would have liked a bit more of a reason for the sex, but at least there was playful banter and the women were very willing partners.
I was expecting just a stroking scene with the women there to please the guys. Nothing could be further from the truth I saw onscreen. The women had other kinds of sex, such as oral or vaginal, but it came across as that the women were just doing what we do naturally when we are with a nice looking guy with an attractive natural playtoy. They were not huge monsters and you could see that most were about the size of a woman’s hand and maybe a little more. My guess would be about 6 and a half inches, which for me is the perfect size. In many scenes the couple gave each other compliments and encouragement as well as telling each other what they liked. They say sex is mostly mental and I agree. A few scenes had a premise where it was in an office and the couple knew each other as boss with employee. One was even a therapist who got a bit carried away helping her patient relax.
In most scenes, she strokes him and he tries to reciprocate by either fingering her or in some cases vaginal. She plays with his balls a lot in most scenes. I have found most guys are not okay with that, so for me that is a fantasy that I look for in porn.
The scene I liked the best was called Hot Skinny Redhead Jerks Off Her Boyfriend and starred Layla Exx and Jarrod Steed. He got me with the name. He sounds like he is hard and ready to go. Unlike many of the other scenes, there was only stroking and no other sex. She absolutely loved what she was doing and he had his eyes roll into the back of his head. She kept asking him if he felt good and he kept telling her how much he was having fun, as well as what he liked for her to do. She kept telling him how much she enjoyed being with him and how much she was enjoying this. One thing I really liked was that she played with his balls just about nonstop. I never get tired of seeing guys balls and seeing them getting cupped and stroked. He eventually came on her smiling happy face and the cumshot is quite the scene, especially when I used the feature that lets you play it in slow motion. For me a one quarter speed meant I could focus on what I like the best in any porn scene.
The site had a few other user friendly features. Besides one quarter speed, also available are half, normal, one and a half and double speed. Maybe I don’t know enough about porn, but I have never seen those as options before. Some other features are that you can favorite a scene, make a playlist, and even change the filters. Choices for those are natural, black and white, and vintage. I went with natural, but I can see why you might want to go for saturate on a few scenes. I tried vintage and black and white, but why would anyone want those? The scene descriptions were helpful and there are trailers. You can stream in choices that start with 720p as the best. There are more choices for downloading such as 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p.They have both photos and screenshots too.
There are a couple of cons. Besides that, the categories and tags are not very helpful, as there are only a few. In all fairness, with 51 scenes that is a con I can live with.
I am not sure what guys would think of this site. I think they would agree that the women are pretty and a few are a dream come true. They come across as naturally interested in these guys, so for me that is a huge plus. I would not hesitate to recommend this for any woman. |
|
12-08-21 07:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
103
|
Cum For Cover
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site about a lot of cumming men and the women willing to try and use their faces and mouths to catch it.
This is going to appeal to those into “almost” bisexual men.
It’s also going to appeal to those that like watching women see how fast they can make multiple men cum.
There are 98 scenes and I have a feeling I will download all 98 (something I usually don’t do)
Very pretty women for this type of porn. I even knew a couple (Veronica Leal and Anastasia Brokelyn) |
| Cons: |
It seems to be a trend with this group. There are scenes from pre-2008, a large space of nothing, then the scenes started back, causing some inconsistency in the quality.
No new updates in 10 months. |
| Bottom Line: |
I will start with why I said this could appeal to “almost” bisexual male fans. Some of these women aren’t messing around. You stick 5-6 dicks in their face and they’ll stick two, even three of them in their mouth at the same time. You also get the part probably only women notice like when the one guy cums really hard and it hits one of the other guys on accident. Talk about having to work in a dangerous environment.
What impresses me most is the length of these scenes. Most are at least 40 minutes long. That means these women are most likely going through these 5-8 guys without any editing and getting all 5-8 of them off. It’s impressive especially when you see how pretty some of the models are. They do not look like they should be in this type of porn. They look more like they should be in softcore porn, being feminine and pretty. But here they are swapping 5-8 dicks in and out of their mouths and hands. A few of the older scenes do have two women in them instead of just one. I believe there’s a market for this niche. There are the women like me who wonders what it would be like to have this many men standing nude in front of me and there are the men who maybe fantasize about being in a group of men having their way with a beautiful woman.
I am going to mention the picture sets. These are professional quality photo sets that focus on the model. Those make for a good footnote to the scenes. Just when you’re watching her weave her way through the web of dicks, look back at her clothed picture and how pretty and even innocent she looks.
I think this site more than any from this group leaves me wanting more. I have watched these types of scenes from other studios, but these are really good, even the poorer video quality old scenes. These sites could really get away, at least with me, with focusing on remastering their older videos instead of worrying about new updates. The content is that good.
You get 98 scenes, there is enough inconsistency in the video quality, I can’t even put a number on how many scenes have 1080p and 720p, I can say 19 have 4K, 1080p and 720p, just glancing over the rest it looks like half of the scenes have 720p and 1080p, those have the little HD badge on them, but they’re mixed up so maybe they have been doing some remastering.
It’s a niche I believe has more potential than the porn companies seem to believe. It’s another site that I won’t score too high since it does look like they’re not going to update anymore, but will score high enough to say give it a look. |
|
09-07-21 04:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
104
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Superior technical quality, anal-centered, including DPs
520 scenes with downloadable photos and videos.
Long scenes (40-60 minutes is common)
Extensive tagging system that may go further than needed.
It is updating, but there is no set schedule and some updates may be questionable with a scene in May seemingly being Christmas-themed.
Pro models with the pros and cons that come with that. |
| Cons: |
Scenes are formulaic despite the long duration.
The updates do concern me. Two some months, 0 in one month, four in one month. It balances out if you have a year membership, but not as good if you’re on a monthly membership.
European pro models can be very inconsistent OR robotic, there’s not a lot of middle ground. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is going to mark off a lot of “good” check boxes. The videos are long, the photo sets are real photo sets, not screencaps, they also have screencaps too and the quality if impressive. Nearly 200 of their 520 scenes have 4K in their download options.
This is an odd one for me. As much as I prefer long scenes, the long scenes on this site do not really have anything to do with story or building of a story. The scenes are just 40-60 minutes of hardcore sex. Their tagging system reminds me of the long length videos too. One scene has 44 tags. Some of the tags are also not very specific like, “watery” and “casual” or “fake” is that fake boobs? Fake action? Fake cum?
The theme doesn’t change in these scenes. It’s very straightforward that you’re going to see all three orifices of the woman penetrated and for those into dual penetration they have a tag for that. They even have tags for dual penetration positions like DP-Cowgirl, DP-Standing, DP-Reverse Cowgirl. I can’t be negative about the action and do think it’s why these professional models are better suited by sites like this. These models seem to be used to the camera, the dual penetration, the rigors of a 40-60 minute hardcore scene, sometimes with two men. It’s very watchable. I usually would feel uncomfortable with scenes like these since so many sites try to show the model in pain or looking like she’s being forced. This site gets a “good job” star on their report card for making clean, watchable, sexy, visually pleasing porn.
The download options are also extensive: It does look like they may encode their videos a little high. They have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p, mobile, a high res photo zip file that has photos that are 5700x3600 resolution and a screenshots zip download.
I believe it just comes down to your mood. You’re not going to get much story. The models are very attractive and seem to not only enjoy the scenes, but even give very real performances. It’s polished porn, but I believe in this hardcore of a niche that’s not that common. This niche seems more suited for a dark room with a couple of amateurs. I like the site. On the videos and the encoding, the 720p videos are encoded at 4500-5000 bitrate and it does make the files large, especially when combined with the length of the scenes. Some of the 4K scenes are nearly 20GB each. Complaining about a site excelling at something isn’t much of a complaint. |
|
08-31-21 08:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
105
|
Give Me Teens
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with a blend of older/younger males with females and females with females.
The site currently has 1,408 scenes, but the updates have stopped despite looking like they were really getting going in March of this year.
Videos and pictures are downloadable for every scene.
Multiple niches are interspersed (interracial, threesomes, stepfamily)
Quality of videos is high with up to 4K on newer scenes
Most of the scenes are longer in length than expected (30 minutes plus) |
| Cons: |
It’s not as much of a problem with the male with female scenes, but it’s hard to tell which is the older female in some of the lesbian scenes.
There are minimal stories and mostly poor acting. The scenes seem older than they are, even the ones released in 2021. |
| Bottom Line: |
The size of the site surprised me. It could be advertised better. I did not realize it’s an older/younger site. The scenes do leave a little to be desired. The stories are needed in this type of scene. Just listing the title as uncle or stepbrother isn’t enough. It’s a combination of those two cons. It feels like if they put a little more time into the production values, they would have a really great site on their hands.
The mixture of niches makes the content interesting with interracial, lesbian, stepfamily, threesomes -- and it’s all under the older/younger genre. There is a good mix of ethnic groups, but it could be better in the interracial scenes. As nearly all are an older black man with a younger white woman.
The site has longevity on its side, but there is the downside to that too. The oldest content goes back to 2006. The 2006 scenes to the 2011 scenes have 240p, 480p and the 2009-2010 scenes added 540p, once into 2011, the 720p and 1080p options show up. I do not think I can really complain about that. It still has 10+ years of HD scenes. The picture sets are not a pro or con. They are there, most are very small (30 pictures) and the pictures do look like screencaptures from the video.
The updating schedule is where a problem shows up. From April 2021 to current (August 2021), there have been two updates. The month of March 2021 had 7 updates just in March. The older/younger genre does seem to be sporadic with updates, but this site looks like it has stopped updating for good with the last update being 3 months ago.
The size of the site helps make up for the lack of new updates with 1,408 scenes, which is one of the biggest collections of older/younger porn I have seen. I will add these scenes do not go as extreme in the age differences as a site like Grandpas Fuck Teens. These look more like the older one is 30s to maybe 50s with the younger one looking 18-24. The length of the scenes would normally make me think there would be more story and buildup in the scene, but there’s not much of either.
I do like the site. I just wish the scenes were put together with a little more thought. Some of the scenes are dangerously close to making me feel like I’m just watching any other genre or niche -- nearing the generic feeling level. I still believe it’s a good site for those who enjoy the older/younger genre and would recommend it to those who do. |
|
08-09-21 03:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
106
|
Glory Hole Initiations
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
A different type of Gloryhole site from their other Gloryhole.com site. Most of these scenes are a white male or multiple white males with black women.
Updates once per month.
345 scenes with downloadable videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
The site has gone through changes over the years with the older scenes being white women with white men. Those scenes also advertise the HD option, but they are not HD, they are 480p.
The 4K videos cost $3.99 per each scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
One part that impressed me about this particular site is the women seem to be more into the scenes than on the network’s other gloryhole site (gloryhole.com). The set for the scenes is also an improvement over their other gloryhole site which just uses a bathroom stall. This site’s sets look more like a changing room. Maybe I just think the toilet stall scenes seem unsanitary? There are also scenes on this site with not only multiple men (one on either side of the wall), but some even have two women inside the “room”. There are variations from scene to scene. The main focus is a blowjob and handjob, but most of the scenes -- especially the newer ones -- include full sex through the gloryhole.
The site is of good size with 345 scenes, but they only update once per month. It does seem to be one of their more popular sites based on the user comments left on the scenes. If it’s possible, I would even say the sets are more classy than their other gloryhole site. It has more of a good feel to it than their other gloryhole site has. The women seem to enjoy themselves. There is more of a positive feeling. That’s something I believe these gloryhole sites could look into. While their other gloryhole site tries to show more of a random situation where the unsuspecting woman is surprised by the dick popping through the wall, this one has more of a we planned it this way feel.
Similar to most of the other sites on this network, the older scenes have a high resolution of 480p despite claiming “Big HD” . The majority of the scenes do have 720p and 1080p. You still have to pay $4 per scene if you want the 4K version of the videos. I liked this gloryhole site better than their other one and think they should focus on updating this one as much as they do the other one. |
|
02-26-21 05:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
107
|
TS Bailey Jay
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large solo transsexual site of the very pretty Bailey Jay.
637 downloadable photo sets.
270 downloadable videos including 161 solo.
The site updates 6-7 times per month.
Is part of the TGirl Network.
Premium quality videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
The network itself makes using any of the sites confusing. There are multiple ways to download and each site only uses one of them.
It says there’s a daily download limit of 8GB. I have not hit it. They could lower the bitrate too.
Price is a bit steep considering some of the sites aren’t updating and haven’t in awhile. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bailey Jay is one of the prettiest TS models in porn. She looks like one the AAA female professional models in porn. Except for the fact that she has a bigger than average dick, gets very erect and shoots cum better than most male porn stars. That is an important part of TS porn since a lot of the TS girls are taking hormones and it causes them to have problems with keeping a full erection or fully ejaculating. It’s not a problem for Bailey.
Bailey likes to do solo scenes. Some of these do include her using a dildo on herself while masturbating her dick. She has implants, but because of her natural build being of a medium build, they do not look overdone. Her neck up is where she stands out in the TS world. The first time I watched one of her scenes I thought she looked like former supermodel Cindy Crawford. She is that pretty.
She also does hardcore and some of the scenes are titled “with stranger” and I have no way of verifying that or disputing it. It is noteworthy that she seems to like the “bottom” role even though she is often as big built as the men and with her looks she could probably get some “top” roles.
A few minor complaints include the bitrate in the movies. An 11 minute, 1080p movie should not be nearly 3GB. The bitrate on most of the 1080p scenes is higher than the bitrate I have seen on 4K scenes from other sites. If that download limit of 8GB per day is working that would severely limit how much you could download in a month. They do give you three choices for video downloads and that might be the answer to avoiding those incredibly large 1080p files. They offer a 480p version and a 720p version in WMV. The file size difference is 1080p at 3GB, 720p at 400MB and 480p at 100MB. I’m sure I can live without the excess bitrate of the 1080p.
I do like this site more than the others on the network since it is loaded with content and everything is easier to use on it. It looks like they put a lot of work into this site while the others are not near as consistent. The amount of content tells a little about Bailey, she does seem to much prefer having photos made than video. The updates are currently 5-6 photo sets per month with 1 video per month. I don’t know where she ranks in current TS models, but I have to think she’s near the top. |
|
09-28-20 10:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
108
|
All Girl Massage
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fun take on the massage niche, there are no dicks in it!
Big site with 601 scenes, they update 2 times a month.
All 601 scenes have at least 1080p as their highest resolution, newer scenes add 4K.
English subtitles on the scenes with non-English speaking models.
Includes 5 other massage-themed sites. Some of those have dicks in them.
Oiled up and spread out teenage women makes a woman wonder if those dicks are needed! |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes have a decent story and passable acting, but some are just quiet until the moaning starts. It can catch you off guard if you’re not expecting the moaning -- believe me, it did me!
I would like to see them update more frequently. Two new scenes a month isn’t much.
Maybe a little more playfulness in the scenes. The scenes almost give me the feeling of taking themselves too seriously. |
| Bottom Line: |
Massage niche is of some interest to me, but not based on the massages I get from the little man at a local mall. It does make these scenes more interesting since I have had massages. It makes the massages more uncomfortable! I start noticing the slight touch of my hair. I need to find a teenage, female masseuse.
The scenes are as varied as the niche allows. The niche being genre (lesbian), niche (massage). They do use creative scenarios. One scene is supposed to be during a business meeting. The masseuse gets under the table while the woman being massaged is sitting at the table with two other women. The masseuse starts with rubbing her feet and legs while the one having this done to her tries to be quiet and look like she is listening to the other two. That’s when the masseuse buries her face between the massaged woman’s legs. It kind of reminds me of the stories on Pure CFNM. There are scenes with more than one woman being massaged. Not that I have any idea what is going to happen in that scenario! I have to watch it.
I am always impressed when all of a site’s scenes have at least 1080p downloads and this one has that. They also offer 720p, 480p, and a couple of smaller mobile resolutions. There is a small downloadable picture set with the scenes it usually has 30-40 photos. What I liked best about the site is the diversity in models. There are some white, some brown, some black, some heavy, some slim and it adds to the experience for me. I also believe the diversity helps make the scenes more modern and seem less repetitive.
There are 601 scenes on the site. You all receive access to 5 other massage-themed sites that at least one of those is probably better than this site. Especially if you prefer male/female, which I usually do prefer.
The site navigates well as long as you don’t mind scrolling. Hopefully, they will keep working those stories into these scenes and maybe even expand them. I would think there is a market for best friends giving each other a massage that turns into cooking breakfast for each other. While their husbands are asleep. I had to throw that in or it was going to be bland. The network is a definite join for those that enjoy massage porn. I have joined a few massage sites in the past and found them to be too similar from scene to scene. This network has 6 different sites including this one to keep that from happening. |
|
09-28-20 10:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
109
|
Strap Attackers
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pegging and anti-pegging action
163 scenes but is no longer updating.
Sexy male and female models. Including many mainstream models.
Has some of the first mainstream pegging scenes, dated as 2000.
Video quality varies, but most of the scenes have at least a 720p option, the newest ones have 1080p, the oldest ones are maxed at 480p.
Scenes also have photo downloads and the videos are usually long (anti-pegging causes longer) |
| Cons: |
No new updates, the older video quality is not very good.
This will never be a niche for everyone. |
| Bottom Line: |
I believe the best pegging site is Divine Bitches on Kink's Network. For those that don't know what pegging is it is when a woman uses a strap-on dildo on a man anally. Anti-pegging is considered his reward of getting to have sex with her after she is finished. I think the first mainstream male performer willing to do pegging was Christian XXX. He was also one of the first mainstream male performers willing to do scenes with transsexuals. He has a lot of scenes on this site including the oldest scene from 2000. While pegging hasn't ever had a big following this site surprised even me with mainstream female stars like Jynx Maze, Kristina Rose, Brooklyn Lee and Megan Foxx taking on the role of the pegger.
I do think the better scenes on this site are as good as Divine Bitches scenes. Pegging isn't something I have tried, but it does seem sadistically erotic to think a man would even want to have sex with a woman after she used a strap-on on him and I do believe that is a strong part of my attraction to the pegging scenes. Being from India, the mention of sticking something up a man's butt would get you possibly stoned -- and I'm not talking about drugs. The guys in these scenes are all common performers in this niche and most of them are very masculine, handsome guys.
There are 163 scenes to download or stream. The site looks like a lot of niche sites. There are some scenes from the early 2000s, things picked up around 2010 and started slowing back down around 2014-15. More than half of the videos have 720p and around 1/3 have 1080p as the highest download option. The rest have 480p as their max resolution. Divine Bitches is the same way when it comes to resolution quality. A lot of their best scenes are only available in 480p.
I believe this site is a good representation of what is known as "fair play". If she gets to stick that dildo up your butt, you get to have sex with her. I know this is an assumption on my part, but I think the sex with the female receiving looks more real after she has stuck the dildo up the guy's butt. I don't know if maybe they form some kind of otherworldly bond from the role reversal, but the scenes are all good and worth downloading for fans of pegging and anti-pegging. I can only recommend it to those who know pegging and like it. For anyone else, maybe take a peek at it and see if you think you would like it. |
|
09-09-20 02:04am
Replies (0)
|
Review
110
|
Le Wood
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Super site directed and operated by porn married couple Mark Wood and Francesca Lee
Though the range of niches is broad there isn't anything too shocking like if Mark was with a transsexual. There are transsexuals on the site, but I guess Mark is behind the camera.
Definitely seeing a progressive married couple at work. Both Mark and Francesca have sex scenes with other people and some threesomes together too.
There are 1,377 scenes, but that number is a little inflated by most scenes also having an accompanying behind the scenes video.
The update schedule is different than most sites. It looks like they do a monthly update for the first week of each month (5-7)
The scenes focus on around 50 DVD series they produce including Anal Newbies with 82 scenes. |
| Cons: |
There are some pretty rough and hardcore scenes on here. I was thinking it might be similar to Porn Fidelity. I don't mind most rough scenes, but a few of these were rougher than I like.
I would like a little more story in the scenes that feature both Mark and Francesca.
The mentioned Behind the Scenes videos that bump the video count up by at least 500. These are short 6-10 minute videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's no secret, I like porn that has some perversion to it. Telling me a husband and wife are filming porn together on their site and having sex with other people is perversion! Which is a problem this site has, but I wouldn't call it a con. Mark and Francesca seem to be such professionals they don't show any emotion other than lust when they see their spouse having sex with others. Mark does look to be the lucky guy. He stars in every Anal Newbies scene I have watched and thought the one with Harmony Wonder and Zoe Bloom were very good, but I am sure Francesca got some revenge after watching how much he was loving the anal with those two, little, young models.
I did bring up some of the scenes can be very rough. One of the newest is a good example. It is with Natalie Porkman, who is one of the skinniest, most innocent looking models I have seen. Mark and Francesca completely destroy her. I can see and understand the sex being rough, but there are parts where Francesca has both of Natalie's arms pulled straight back while Mark jabs her throat with his dick. There is a lot of spitting in the scene, on Natalie's face, in her mouth, that's just degrading to me.
I thought one of the best scenes was Mark with Nia Nacci in Anal Brat for White Cock. I think it's a good example of how rough, anal sex can be done without it being degrading. Both him and her seemed to love the scene. Makes you wonder if Francesca keeps a note on a notepad to go a little faster the next time she's with another guy! I think that would make an interesting series. Mark makes Francesca jealous, Francesca makes Mark jealous.
The site is big with those 1,377 scenes and while I did list the Behind the Scenes as a con, some of those are pretty interesting and aren't a complete waste. All 1,377 scenes can be downloaded (as long as you sign up for the download option $5 more for the first month) in 1080p, 720p, 540p, 480p and mobile resolutions. It's an interesting site that didn't quite live up to my expectations coming from the Teen Fidelity/Porn Fidelity sites also ran by a husband and wife. The roughness doesn't surprise me and I knew there would be some. I do think one of the funniest parts is Mark is in so many of the anal scenes. I can just imagine him saying to Francesca, "But this is a new series and I want it to be perfect!" There are a few other guys that get their chances in the anal scenes. Mark seems like a likeable guy so I would think that helps with him being that involved in the anal scenes. I would recommend it to those into hardcore, anal, even some roughness. |
|
09-08-20 11:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
111
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful models stretching themselves out for all variations of masturbation.
Long, slow becoming fervor masturbation that clearly shows orgasms.
404 scenes with updates seeming to stop 2 months ago.
The site is easy to use with simple searches or complicated if you want to jump into the advanced search.
The scenes include a long video (by masturbation standards) and photo set. Downloads are unlimited.
No ads that I have seen. |
| Cons: |
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes.
Bottom Line:
I see this type of site as being something porn fans will either love or dislike, not hate. You are going to see a lot of spread pussies. There is some teasing. There is some anal play. There is a beautiful model in the same setting as the previous beautiful model spreading her pussy, teasing and possibly playing anally. Some of the models seem to be made for this kind of porn. Their scenes are very good. They love being watched, they love teasing, they love you seeing them having an orgasm. I think if that sounds good to you, you will love the site. If you need more than one person you will probably dislike the site.
It makes me think a site like this is where every gynecologist found their interest in becoming a gynecologist! I do see a site like this as female-positive. The models look stunning, you would not expect them to jump up in a chair and start spreading their legs looking like they do. They look more like they are going out on a nice date. Hopefully, someone bought them a nice dinner before they put on these performances.
The video quality is great, but inconsistent. Of the newest updates, two of the 4 newest do not have 4K, while the other 40-50 do have 4K. That makes me think they may have recycled old scenes. That was a newer term to me until recently. If you are interested in the 4K versions of these videos, you better have a lot of hard drive space and a fast internet connection as some of those are as big as 15 Gigabytes per scene. They do offer lower, in my opinion, better options with the 720p and 1080p versions. The photos add a nice touch. These photos show the model before the scene starts.
There are some unbelievable insertions, but those are in the older scenes. One has a woman masturbating with a baseball bat! The camerawork is a positive or negative for the site. There are a lot of close-ups. I believe close-ups during masturbation are only good if the model is rubbing her clitoris. If her fingers are inside her or a toy is inside her it doesn't make much sense to me to go close-up. I would classify this as a fetish site even though there are no definitive fetishes being played to unless, the pussy, is a fetish. All you need to ask yourself is do you want to look at 400 pussies? That is why I said I don't think any porn fan would hate the site. |
|
09-08-20 10:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
112
|
Pride Studios
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gay network that is run by the same people as Adult Time. With this many gay sites I have to wonder if they will eventually have a Gay Adult Time or just add all the Gay scenes to Adult Time? This is the second gay network I have reviewed from Gamma.
Nine sites are included and combined they have 4,502 videos.
Videos are downloadable with the subscription I bought, but they do also offer a streaming membership as well, make sure to pay attention when signing up.
This is just an observation: There are more masculine men on this network than other gay networks I have been on. I see the word “bear” a lot and you get the bigger build, hairy (beards, chests) here than on other gay networks.
Currently averaging 4 updates per week.
Plenty of scenes here for straight women to enjoy too. |
| Cons: |
If you have any kind of preconceived notion of what a gay man looks like or acts like, it is probably going to be messed up by this network. A lot of these guys look like big, burly lumberjacks and athletes. I am listing that in cons for the gay men readers who prefer the twinks.
Just an outsider’s opinion, there is not as much to do in gay sex as straight sex. I join gay sites for the solo scenes, but some of these guys in male/male scenes were sexy enough to watch and I just felt like they need to add a woman. That is an idea even. How about a site where a woman masturbates while two men have sex? |
| Bottom Line: |
These are the sites you receive with this network:
Pride Studios
Bearback
Cock Virgins
Circle Jerk Boys
Boyz Party
Dylan Lucas
Extra Big Dicks
High Performance Men
Men Over 30
Being in my 30s, I really do not see a lot of these guys looking like they’re under 30. I am saying that in response to their site “Men Over 30”. Most of these guys look in their 30s to 40s. There is a total of 2,543 different guys. This is a large network. They also offer photos and their count is just over 250,000 total photos. They have some niches here that I had not seen before like Beards and Bulges, Husbands in Lockdown and I think those could interest straight women.
My main interest is the solo videos. This did create a problem. They do not have categories. They have tags so if you find a solo scene you will see the solo tag, BUT you cannot click it. They have 10-20 tags per scene, but none are clickable. This left me with one option and that was to use the search box. I am getting mixed results with that. A few test examples based on their tags:
I searched for “solo”
Eight of the first twelve scenes that came up are solo. Which is not bad, but it does show a weakness when trying to find specific tags/niches.
I searched for “jerking off” which is one of their tags.
The first problem is it doubled every scene so there is Live Life, Scene #02 listed twice in the first 12 results. Of the first 12 results for jerking off, only 3 are solo guys.
It’s going to take some work to find all the solo scenes, but there is a large collection of them that I have already downloaded (100+).
I don’t know if I am just not very knowledgeable about gay porn or sex, but the site Circle Jerk Boys, which I expected to be a group of guys masturbating together really isn’t. It has a few scenes where the guys are masturbating together, but most of those turn into standard sex.
That is really my biggest complaint. Make the content easier to sort and search. This is the first site (gay, straight, transsexual) I have been on that has tags that are not clickable.
You do get very good quality videos. It is similar to Adult Time’s video download options with 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
It looks like for the current situation with the pandemic they are releasing compilation videos and that is okay with me since I didn’t have any of the content. I cannot speak for gay men, but this network does lean more towards the big, athletic, bear type male models than twinks. Some of the most commonly seen tags are “Athletic”, “Beefy”, “Muscular” and “Jock Strap”.
Besides the issue with finding what you are looking for this is a very good network. |
|
06-17-20 05:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
113
|
Exxxtra Small
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cute, petite models, most look barely legal.
310 current scenes.
Downloads for videos and photo zips are available. Each scene has both.
One new scene per week.
Biller is Epoch.
Videos average 30 minutes each. |
| Cons: |
Is close to cookie cutter gonzo porn. The only unique feature is the size and cuteness of the models.
Not enough threesomes or more. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has some of the cutest, youngest looking models available. The clothing choices also makes them look and seem younger with skirt rompers, some pigtails and this is all accentuated by most of the males being tall and with large penises.
The scenes could have more story to them, but it seems like the whole site is just based on these small models trying to take on a bigger guy. The site has been around long enough to have 310 scenes. The videos are excellent quality and can be downloaded or streamed. The downloads top out at 1080p. The videos are crisp and clear, but they are large files on the 1080p ones. If you’re strapped for hard drive space you could always download the 720p, 576p or 480p versions. The 1080p ones can be as large as 3-4GB.
The models are the main attraction. Most of them are pros, but they are newer to the business or were newer when they filmed their scenes here. A good example of how they use the male model to make the female look smaller is a scene with Michael Swayze with Amber Summers. Michael Swayze is listed as 6’5”, Amber Summers is 5’1”. I just wish they would add a little more to it than the obvious size difference. A few scenes are more creative including one with the tiny woman hiding on top of a refrigerator, tucked under cabinets.
There is good diversity in the models, but we are talking about diversity in an age group/generation where mixed race is nearly the majority. A few scenes are called interracial, but the male and female both look white to me.
It’s a very good site if you like seeing smaller women having sex. And don’t mind the outfits they show up in being cliché like Girl Scouts, cheerleaders and plaid skirts with argyle socks. |
|
01-27-20 08:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
114
|
Hogtied
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the best bondage sites available.
Comes with the Kink network.
Updates twice per month and has a huge back catalog of over 1,300 scenes, they have been releasing scenes here since 1998!
Very graphic positions that show everything.
One of the few sites that convinces me this pain is pure pleasure.
Great selection of models including many you wouldn't expect to see on a bondage site.
Very easy join and cancel options, it's much improved over how it was a year or so ago. |
| Cons: |
Kink's sites are plagued with one common con. They are niche-orientated and can become repetitive.
I would like to see more action between the male and female, most of the scenes are simply the male using a vibrator or powered dildo on the hogtied female. |
| Bottom Line: |
While watching some of these scenes I realized that Kink uses almost no airbrushing or cover-up on the models and I think it's why I like the network show much. One of the newer scenes has a model that looks like she recently gave birth to a child or was once very overweight. She has stretch marks on her stomach, very attractive model and instead of covering those stretch marks they seem to make a point of showing them throughout the scene. It's a refreshing twist in the body image dominated porn land.
This site is huge. It's hard for me to even comprehend some of this content was released when I was underage! Major points for making me feel young!
The concept is simple. The rope master or vibrator king ties a woman up in a sexual position, he then uses a vibrator, sometimes a powered dildo and then they switch her position. This is where you see their experience. The camera zooms in right as the powered dildo penetrates the model. The orgasms get full attention. There is use of hot wax, there are positions men are always talking about not seeing enough of like the model laying on her stomach with her ass up in the air complete with a perfect back arch.
It's as erotic and sexy as you can make women being tied up and "abused".
The videos are downloadable in multiple resolutions, the top is only 1280x720, but those do have a 5000+ bitrate and are very clear. They have four other smaller options to download as well. The scenes are relatively long (40-50 minutes).
My biggest complaint is I would like to see more action between the male and female. I know it would be hard to get the guy into position to have sex with the hogtied woman, but I think it would break some of the monotony.
The models do a good job of getting themselves into sexy positions. I think the best is on their knees with their feet under the ass and pussy sticking out. It seems to be the one that works best for the model too.
I have to think this is the one of the longest running, still-updating sites there is with scenes from 22 years ago and still 2 new updates per month. I think the scene with Alexis Tae might be worth the price of the membership by itself. She seems genuinely innocent and new to bondage. The male is quite rough with her, but she is very much into it and you can see her becoming more into it as the scene goes.
The scenes also include a downloadable zip of images, some of the older scenes don't have them, but the majority do. It's a site that doesn't seem like it would be very erotic and it might not be to some, but I like it a lot. I didn't score it as high as some of the other Kink sites as the niche is very narrow and repetitiveness does create the feeling of some of the scenes being too similar. They do include waterboarding, ball gags and throw just about everything at the model -- while she's hogtied.
A very good site overall. |
|
11-12-19 12:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
115
|
BFFs
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A standalone site by the Team Skeet group.
Scenes are interesting, silly, funny, high production quality and most are very long (45 minutes or more).
137 scenes with videos and photos to download.
Some of the "cuter" lesbian scenes I've seen.
Updates twice per month.
Not all scenes are just females, some have multiple guys in them as well. |
| Cons: |
Like other Team Skeet sites there's a block of ads right in the middle of the scene listing.
I can't find a model list just for BFFs, the model list at the top of the page shows me all the models on all the Team Skeet sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site looked fun and I have generally liked the Team Skeet sites, especially the standalone ones. It was exactly what I expected and hoped for.
One scene is a group of 3 dorm friends peeking in the door and recording their friend having sex with a guy. There are a couple of exercise/fitness scenes that are better than all the content I saw on Fitness Rooms. It's very professional feeling and I think with content like this, it has to be. You're really not going to get a roomful of amateur girls to just start ad-lib from yoga into an orgy.
I read some of the previous reviews and thought I would update some of the cons others have listed. The download options on videos are 1080p, 720p, 576p, 480p and 360p. The 1080p files are very large due to the length of the scenes, one I downloaded was 4.5GB for a 1080p 53 minute scene.
They have those options on all 137 scenes.
They do list the models names and you can click them to see if they have any other scenes. Some are very vague like Ecstasy and one of the guys is John Doe.
They have trailers, screencaps, pictures and videos of each scene.
I think the strongest point of the content is that there is a story even if it's silly. I also joined their standalone site Family Strokes and thought it had a very similar feel to this site.
I have read that Team Skeet is going to start including these standalone sites with Team Skeet for a special price. Even having paid the add-on price of $10, I feel I got my money's worth. I downloaded 45 scenes and feel like they will be ones I will keep and watch multiple times.
There's nothing at all serious about any of these scenes. They even have one with 3 girls playing video games, with the "loser" having to have sex with one of the girl's geeky brother. I like porn like that. Just give my imagination something to work with.
The only real negatives are the ones you'll find on all Team Skeet sites. Every few rows of scenes there are two rows of ads. I don't find them that bad just because I would like to try more of their standalone sites and those ads give me an idea of which ones I might like.
For me, it's a very above average site for those that like cute girls being playful with each other. |
|
10-22-19 01:51am
Replies (1)
|
Review
116
|
Burning Angel
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Major points for artistic quality and production values of these very tattooed models having sex.
1504 scenes, newer scenes have 4K and 8 other video options from 160p to 1080p.
One update per week though they did miss a week recently.
The sex has two speeds, rough and rougher.
Interesting Halloween-themed scenes including a grown-up Wednesday Addams look-alike.
Looks like they spend a fortune on some of their scenes and that someone sat with a notebook writing every step of the scene out. |
| Cons: |
Unique gets boring too. Though they have a story with most scenes they barely touch on it before it becomes just another porn scene except with tattooed performers.
Some of the guys are just hideous to look at. |
| Bottom Line: |
I come from a culture that is very accepting of tattoos. In our history, they were often revered as a show of royalty. As an expat in America, I still have the intrigue towards the tattoos, but haven't got one myself.
Maybe it's just me thinking too much, but do people with tattoos always have rough sex? Does it come with the territory? I like rough sex porn. It's just it seems like every scene here is recorded in double speed.
Some of the models are really pretty. Some of them look like their tattoos make them prettier. A lot of the guys on here look like a full body tattoo would be an improvement.
They have 1,504 scenes, streaming player works great, I only download the scenes with models I like (Karma RX, Lily Lane, Gina Valentina) are a few of those. I do think Gina's inclusion is funny. She's nothing like most of these models when it comes to number of tattoos or piercings, but she's a very pretty woman.
If you're into anal they have 330 scenes with anal. It honestly seems like more than that after watching multiple scenes all with anal.
I think the best scenes on here are the solo scenes. There are only 132, but you do get very rough masturbation from those 132 scenes. It fills in a niche that isn't very popular. Most solo scenes stay firmly in the softcore genre. Joanna Angel, one of the most prolific models on the site has an outstanding balcony masturbation scene. I really think they should focus on releasing more of these solo scenes. The last one was nearly 18 months ago.
That is my one major complaint. The scenes over the last year are interchangeable. They're still creative, they're still different than normal porn, but only until you get over the shock of the body art.
It's a polarizing site to me. There are people who will hate it for all the tattoos and implants and there are people who will love it just for those reasons. I know a site like this promotes an alternative lifestyle and that's where I think they miss. An alternative lifestyle would have solo, lesbian, orgies, swingers, but instead, the majority of scenes are just male/female.
It's recommended for those that like tattoos and if you are into solo scenes the ones here are very good. |
|
10-15-19 12:54am
Replies (2)
|
Review
117
|
Mofos Network
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very good network with not too soft and not too hard hardcore sex.
The scenarios are much better than on similar networks.
I'm not bi or lesbian, but they have some of the prettiest women in their scenes.
Has 14 different sites included each with a specific niche.
I thought I was getting a great deal at $9.95 and will list it as a pro since I don't download much.
If money is no object they have a lot of addons they offer good prices on. |
| Cons: |
There are no downloads included with the $9.95 price. I was interested in the content not so much for downloads, it's $14.95 more to add downloads.
It's such a nicely laid-out site, very user-friendly, but there are upgrades all along the top of the screen and each time you sign in they try to get you to upgrade. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network could be one of the best in porn. The scenes are fun, creative, and the models are a step above the quality of models I am used to seeing on sites like these.
But I know the charging more for downloads isn't going to be very popular for most people.
The amount of attempted upgrades isn't going to help either. Look at this list of sites you can upgrade to: True Amateurs, Brazzers, Twistys, FakeHub, Property Sex, Trans Angels, Digital Playground, Pornhub Premium, Babes, Hentai Pro, WhyNotBi, Reality Kings, Erito and Metro. If that's not distracting enough they have a channels section that has 13 channels on it. I don't know if I have to pay to use those or not.
It says pay $9.95 to access the Porn Portal which is all those sites listed above. I don't believe they are going to give me all those sites for $9.95. Maybe it's $9.95 per site?
Most of the reason I scored it only 88 is the confusion.
The content is very good. I would score it 90-95 in content. The site Share My BF is one of the best ones I've seen. The use of clothing, leggings being ripped off, shorts being slid over, is something most porn skips.
Other sites like Don't Break Me, Girls Gone Pink and I Know That Girl have a great, almost amateur feel to them. They have a good Public site called Public Pickup, too.
The sites you receive without any upgrades have a total of nearly 4,000 scenes and photosets. They are updating 1 scene per day.
The streaming player works well. I prefer not to pay for downloads just to include the download information in a review.
It's a site I will mark down to return to and plan on paying for downloads next time. It's not really a con, but the cancellation system could be easier. I had to send them an email. To send the email, I had to go through 4 screens of offers and "are you sure" screens. |
|
09-02-19 11:22pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
118
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Solo, extreme, gaping, pretty and sexy women.
Averages 3 updates per month. It looks like they could have more than that, but nothing consistent with the update schedule.
High quality videos and photos. All are downloadable and unlimited.
Very pretty models that I think are nearly all European. There are a few that may not be.
Bipolar porn, she looks innocent, she’s acting innocent, don’t stick THAT in there! She does it anyway. Somehow, these models do that in a pretty way.
Good navigation and tags, but they do have a lot of tags. The most I think I’ve ever seen. |
| Cons: |
It's no surprise this site is on Sapphix just like Sapphic Erotica and there is the white living room again. If a person recognized the background city, they could go watch these scenes in person. The windows have no curtains. It’s a joke, but the white background isn’t.
The scenes on this are different. A lot of the newer ones are just masturbation with some extreme parts. The older scenes are the most extreme masturbation I have seen. That’s going to be pro for some and a con for others. I don’t mind it, but believe it fits better in the cons. It’s not what you expect from solo porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
I can set up the scenes on this site by saying the model will convince you she’s an innocent little dove (thanks all white background!). She will then tease and show a little skin. She will show how pretty she is. I look away and she has a baseball bat stuck up in her and her legs in a V. It’s whoa porn. You skipped some things on your way to that V. I like it just because it jumps from innocent to not innocent in a split second or V. The models look like they belong on a softcore, glamorous site. Seeing them with only their heels on and they left those on for grips. It’s a good change from sites that stay within the softcore niche. Yeah, she’s pretty, has a nice body, but I just don’t think a guy or woman is going to want her just teasing. I want to believe women this pretty make people want to gape them. That is a unique concept this site has going for it.
Its overall size is not as big as you might think. It “only” has 402 scenes and has been open since 2004. They had a lull in updates from 2009 to 2013. There is disparity between the newest scenes and oldest scenes. It really doesn’t seem like the same site even. I do believe just like with Sapphic Erotica, it’s the models that are making that difference. It could be production as well. There are some really pretty models in the newer scenes that do some extreme. I really like Candy Belle’s scene. It’s after the lull period. I know they have it in them to make the more extreme and even excited masturbation scenes. I never thought I would say a woman using a Magic Wand on her clitoris and has a dildo up her butt, was not extreme, but it’s not extreme in 2022. I think housewives do that now.
The quality is as high as I think you can get. Especially if you consider how long they have the high quality. You can go back before the lull and those still have 720p and 1080p downloads. They had 4K starting at the new year in 2015. The scenes are very long for solo porn. The Candy Belle scene I mentioned is 52 minutes long of her teasing, in the bathtub, on the bathroom floor, on a chair, using a Magic Wand, a very girthy dildo stuck to the floor, using the sprayer in the bathtub. She ran out of toys. You still don’t get the extremes that the old scenes had. The baseball bats, the needing an assist from another model just to get that bat in her.
It’s good for those that like solo, long and teasing scenes. They do a good job of showing how teasy the model is at the beginning of the scenes. That sometimes can last 10-15 minutes. I don’t know that everyone likes that. I do, but I like softer porn. I keep thinking I’m going to develop some of the teasing ability if I watch enough. I do believe the easiest way for me to describe is it’s different. I haven’t seen sites like this. The models do it all with a big, pretty smile.
It's a good site for when you feel like you’ve seen everything that porn has to offer which isn’t much these days. I’m sure that there was a reason, some demand even, for this site to be opened back up in 2014 after the 4 years of no updates. I have liked it the last few times I joined Sapphix. |
|
08-05-22 10:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
119
|
Ladyboys Fucked Bareback
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large ladyboy site that I’m not for sure if it’s updating, even though it shows a January 2022 update.
Good site for people to get their first experience with ladyboys.
There are 4K downloads available, but it’s why I have a red flag about the new updates. A few of those do not have 4K while the older updates do.
It almost makes me blush to say, the biggest dicks I have seen on ladyboys besides someone like Long Mint.
Fairly kinky scenes, no condoms, a lot of rimming and the males in the scenes are mostly attractive too.
There are 483 scenes on this site. It does show new updates. I haven’t been a member for two years. I can’t really go back to the downloads I have and see how much if any is recycled. |
| Cons: |
Just based on the name you’re not going to get much solo action which is my preference and you’re not going to get the ultra-rare ladyboys with a female.
The oldest scenes are from 2009 and those are very small resolution. I believe maybe 360p. The older scenes are not really worth the hassle. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a highly recommended site for males that are interested in transsexuals. The ladyboys, in my opinion, are an easier place to start. There is a more feminine side to the ladyboys. The one glaring problem I see is the implants are very noticeable. It looks kind of like most American porn sites. I do not mind as much. I would love to see these ladyboys in solo. Some of these ladyboys on this site are probably more in the range of 5-7 inches in dick length. There are much better erections than you see on a lot of ladyboy sites. I do not have the knowledge of how this all works in the porn industry. These ladyboys remind me more of slimmer, smaller framed transsexuals. I don’t believe they’re taking a lot of hormone therapy. I’m not for sure these ladyboys cross that transgender line like a lot of ladyboys do.
One of the scenes listed as a newer update has the model DeeDee in it. The model names on these sites are terrible to say the least. They do the same name with a number behind it like Patty 3, Emmy 4. I believe Long Mint, one of the best known ladyboys is on this site. She’s likely listed as Mint. It is a very large site with nearly 500 scenes. There’s nothing resembling a story or plot in these scenes. There’s not a lot of kinkiness other than the bareback part. You don’t see hardly any ladyboy topping the male on this site. That’s where the site’s age shows. It’s why some of the other sites I reviewed show a progression and some creativity. The best part about these scenes is looking at the pretty ladyboys with the big dicks. I hate to reduce myself to that, but it is the selling point of this site. I find it very arousing when the ladyboy is in reverse cowgirl and her hard dick is pointing straight up and not moving.
That is why I think this is a good place to start. It’s not going to require the viewer to enjoy anything other than seeing people aroused. Even with the risk of becoming repetitive and dull from scene to scene, the one part that saves it is the ladyboy. I have learned about size perception. I know that Long Mint herself has talked about she has a very large dick, but she’s also tiny. It makes her dick look even bigger than it really is. She showed her hand size, and it was more like a female’s hand. You see those scenes with her and you’re really looking at a small female’s hand around that erect dick. Long Mint is one of the few ladyboys I know of that has talked about her life and what it’s like. She even speaks fluent English.
There’s no reason for males to feel threatened by these little ladyboys looking like they’re packing 8-9 inches. It’s probably closer to 5-6 inches. These scenes are not as interesting as the newer scenes on their other sites. It’s very straightforward sex.
I checked the video quality of those newest updates. Those have 720p and 1080p. That’s the January and December updates. The updates before those two have an added 4K download option. I don’t believe I recognize these two newest updates. I like both of them. I believe I would remember. The one is with DeeDee, she is one of the ladyboys that is very capable of keeping an upward pointing erection during reverse cowgirl. She may be the best at it. She does have a very noticeable boob job. The other is Lee 3 who is one of the cuter ladyboys that surprising to me has no trouble getting and keeping an erection. She looks teeny, tiny in frame. Her legs are half the thickness of the male that’s with her. It’s her weight that makes her look so small. She is 5’5” according to site and 94 pounds.
I enjoy this site and have for years. It’s never changed much. It isn’t going to touch on many fetishes. It’s still a good place to see what you think of ladyboys. |
|
02-08-22 06:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
120
|
Homemade Anal Whores
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly features James Deen with some of porn’s best female models
Only 67 scenes, but the models do make up for it and most scenes are long.
No 4K, but all scenes have 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads.
Has kind of a diary type feel to it like James just invited these women over to his place and they decided to have sex.
Repeated models with multiple scenes are some of the ones I really like. |
| Cons: |
It's a dead site, I believe. The dates show, but not the year and the newest is from March. This is February, I am guessing that is an older video. Also, the no 4K while most of the sites on here have 4K.
The site loads slower than the other sites on this network. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is an interesting site that is buried on this network. The name makes it interesting -- homemade. The camera/filming style is along the lines of homemade porn, but by no means is bad. It looks like the pro said. Like it’s some kind of sex diary. Several models have multiple scenes and all scenes look to be in the same house. The titles of the scenes are even intriguing. One scene is James Dean with Abella Danger and it is titled, Abella Danger Passionate Amateur Sex. How long ago would it have to be for James or Abella to be classified as amateur? They are two of the handful of porn stars I recognize easily by name. The scene is very good too.
One thing to make a note of, the watermark on it says DTF Sluts, which is a site the company that owns this network also owns and was one of the sites I was hoping to get with Analized. It’s because I have seen scenes like this from DTF Sluts and the scenes are quite erotic while keeping an edge to them and not falling into that genre, I call softer hardcore. I don’t know if all the scenes from this site are from the company’s other sites, but it is a very good site. The scenes last 30-50 minutes. And it’s mostly all sex. I was thinking maybe there would be interviews since the woman shows up at what I assume is James’ house or condo. There is a more personal feel to the scenes like he knows these women personally and while rough, it never turns into the trying to prove something his testosterone level like many of the other scenes from the sites on this network do.
It reminds me more of a guy is getting lucky with some very pretty and sexy women. He doesn’t want to risk doing anything that will stop them from answering his calls. That personal touch, kind of removes the porn feeling. All of these women are well-known porn models. Chanel Preston has multiple scenes. Ava Addams and Mystica Jade. I don’t think it’s that old of content. You can download in 1080p and one of the newer scenes is a sexy scene with Kira Noir, who is very attractive.
It's all too typical that this would be the one that’s not updating, anymore. I feel like these networks find something good and decide to stop it, maybe come back to it later. From looking at the scenes on James Deen’s site, I don’t get the same feeling as I get from these scenes. This site may be his best work. It’s sexy and I don’t find him attractive at all, but the mood and the quietness of the scenes. The one with Abella is probably worth joining just for it. I haven’t really seen her like this. She is usually pretty dominant and aggressive. She’s more toned down, moaning, passionate like the scene title says. I even think the no pictures with scenes makes it seem that much more like it’s not porn. It’s his personal life. Very good site that is probably better than the rest of the network combined. It shows me my negative feelings towards the other sites on this network are probably validated by this. The other scenes on the other sites are robotic and forced feeling. You get this more natural feel from these scenes, and you can see why the other sites do not give as good of an impression. I have the other network from them. I just joined it a few days ago and won’t review any of it yet. |
|
02-05-22 11:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
121
|
All Internal
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Hardcore site with creampies and quite a few threesomes.
Pretty European models that don’t speak a bit of English.
Positions that I don’t see a lot in porn that look like should be used more often, visually stimulating.
Seems to be updating on an inconsistent schedule with 1 update in August, 5 in July.
Excellent technical quality and easy to use website.
They have 590 scenes with video, pro photo set and screenshots with each scene. |
| Cons: |
I don’t know why, but once you show me threesomes, the male/female scenes become boring.
A few scenes in newest updates look to be older scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have started watching for the recycling problem in porn and wish I didn’t. It becomes an obsession of looking numbers up and trying to decide if a scene really is new or not. Currently, the 9th newest update doesn’t have a 4K download option and that makes me think it has been recycled from the past. Their own technical superiority causes that. Of their newest 250 scenes, all of the videos have a 4K download option except that one. It makes that one stick out like a sore thumb.
Besides that, this is a really good site if you like creampies. I can’t say I do. I don’t hate them either, but a big turn-on for me when watching porn is watching the guy cum outside the woman. The action itself nearly makes up for it. These scenes are very well edited, produced and there’s a real feeling of heat and passion between the male and female models.
The threesome scenes make the site. It’s hard for me to believe these are not bisexual males with a woman. They are not and there’s no bisexual male action (or score would be higher), but I’m not used to seeing what is two straight males be this passionate with a woman in a threesome unless it’s bisexual males. Very impressed with that part.
The rest of the site has almost no downfalls. There are 590 scenes, right at 250 of those have 4K video downloads and you have to go back to the first 90 scenes to find ones without 720p or 1080p downloads. That gives them 250 scenes with 4K down to mobile and 500 scenes total with at least 1080p and 720p down to mobile. The models are surprisingly attractive to me. I usually do not find European models this attractive, but this studio seems to draw top drawer talent. There’s a lot of anal, some DPs, including dual internal cumshots which is at least something I hadn’t seen before.
The tags are useful, but have questionable accuracy. Which is kind of a letdown as the site is quite large to dig through this many scenes.
I usually don’t comment on the settings, but most of the scenes are filmed in what looks like very upscale houses, possibly hotels and I believe it does add to the quality of these scenes. Do people really go to upscale hotels to have wild threesomes? There are also group scenes with as many as two couples, there are a few foursomes with 3 men, triple penetrating the woman and giving her triple internal cumshots. I believe the most I have seen in one scene was a 3 female, 2 male scene. The scenes are all over 30 minutes and I think once you have 4-5 people in the scene the need for a story goes away.
This is one of the better sites I’ve joined. If they had slipped a few bisexual men scenes in and more outside the body cumshots, I would have scored it even higher. The action itself is about as good as I’ve seen in the male/female world of porn. I will mention just to show much I like seeing bisexual men, a few of the scenes with multiple men with one woman does have the woman touching the penises together. I guess they get tease points with me for that. |
|
08-31-21 08:31am
Replies (0)
|
Review
122
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young, cute and sexy lesbian action.
The site updates twice per month and currently has 502 scenes.
The models look to all be professionals or on their way to be professionals, there are 374 total.
Tagging system is useful, but could be more expansive.
Realistic action, but again, these are professional models. Will have a related con.
Video quality is excellent as are the photo sets. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes are a little too professional. You just lose any real belief or even suspended disbelief in the sincerity of the action.
No English subtitles, many of the sites through this company have English subtitles, it takes me back to the too professional feeling, the main form of communication is moaning and there’s not much story. |
| Bottom Line: |
One thing I don’t think anyone can complain about are the looks of the models. Nearly all 374 of these models are very attractive. The action is where you could complain. There’s no doubt the models are giving each other oral sex and kissing, but there is some doubt in maybe 30% of the scenes if we’re just watching professionals going through the motions. I expected a little more with these models being young, but it could be a European difference too.
The story, to me, is very important in lesbian scenes. I want to know if (even if fictional) it’s one’s first time being with a woman or if maybe one has a boyfriend at home, but wants to try a woman. Just give me something to work with.
The technical quality on the site is impressive, but it is important to know something I noticed. The site did not update between 12-18-2015 and 5-4-2018. That’s a 2.5 year gap in updates and I look at that from the technical quality side of it. While they have been producing 1080p since 2010, the 5 years before that are lower quality and 1080p in 2010 isn’t as sharp as 1080p from 2018. That is a note to make to yourself if technical quality is very important to you. The newer videos also have 4K downloads.
The picture sets are quite large with around 125 photos in each and are not screen captures from the videos. These can be downloaded in zip files. Also important if you’re interested in the photos is the newer photo sets are massive in file size (for a photo set). One I downloaded was 1.7GB for the picture set zip. The resolution is 4480x6720. If you like seeing every single inch of the model you can with these pictures.
I just feel like the content could be a little more exciting or even playful. Lesbian scenes don’t seem to have a gray area. Some of the scenes are worth downloading and watching multiple times, while other scenes (even with gorgeous models) are dull and redundant. It didn’t surprise me when I found scenes with still attractive, but not as attractive as the most attractive models on the site -- those scenes were the best. There’s that feeling that some of these models are just there for their looks. It’s still a good site with superior technical quality, especially over the last 3 years. |
|
08-09-21 03:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
123
|
Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It happens once a year, I get in the mood for older/younger porn and this site is another one I believe gets lost in Adult Time.
469 scenes including videos and photos.
Good selection of "grandpas" with most of the males looking old enough to be the female's grandfather.
Access to Adult Time
Newer scenes have 4K downloads if you buy the download subscription, also 1080p, 720p, 540p and on down. |
| Cons: |
Not all the grandpas look like grandpas. Is it really that difficult to find older men to have sex with young, beautiful women?
Only updated every other month.
I know it's not this site's fault, but the Adult Time navigation causes problems for me even when writing this review. |
| Bottom Line: |
The attraction of seeing older men with much younger women is one I have. It is strong enough, about one month each year, I only join sites with older men with younger women or younger women with older women.
I am going to explain that last con to show why I get so frustrated with these Adult Time sites. I was trying to find this site from the search box on Adult Time, "grandpas" was not bringing it up, "fuck teens" was not bringing it up. After 6 clicks, I finally found those sliders where I had straight sex on "do not show". I spend more time on these sites trying to fight with the navigation than downloading porn. Good business move, but annoying for the consumer.
I also do not list their 300GB per day download limit as a con. I don't think I have ever downloaded 300GB in a month.
Grandpas Fuck Teens could use some more fun and playful storylines. This is a niche that could be very fun and kinky. The scenes are a little shorter than I Ilike with most being under 25 minutes and some even below 20 minutes. That's usually the clue there's not much story. I am going to name the "grandpa" who I believe hurts this site, David Perry and any of the others who look, are built like him. Give me the white beards, the white hair, the fat bellies, the white chest hair. Those other guys look like they may be 15-20 years older than the females. Maybe I'm wrong and paying them a huge compliment? It's the visual and the mental part of this niche. To see the gorgeous, young woman looking at what our societal norms say is an unattractive man and she looks like she loves the sex with him. This is the one niche I don't believe "great performances" are needed in. And it's because of the white beards, white hair. Just seeing them get aroused and staying aroused shows the validity of the sex.
The download options are good, I either download the 720p or 1080p, depending on if I think I will really like the scene or not. I'm usually wrong on that attempt at prognosticating.
The scenes themselves are going to be limited by the mobility of the grandpa. I believe that's a strength. They're not switching positions every 5 minutes. The scenes even offer some excitement for women like me. I don't say it much, but the cumshot is one of my favorite parts. With the grandpas, any kind of cumSHOT is exciting. And you don't have the letdown if they just dribble cum since that's the expectation for their advanced ages. I usually would not directly recommend a specific scene, but the one between Bruno SX and Anastasia Brokelyn, titled "Keep Me Hot" is one of the best porn scenes I have seen from any site. He doesn't reach the exciting cumshot, but the cowgirl part of the scene on the couch is incredibly sexy as is her energy after that part. She is practically begging for his cum by the end of the scene. Maybe she has a month every year where she finds the older/younger category more interesting and it happened to be that month for her when she filmed that scene.
I do believe this is another Adult Time site that could be justified as a standalone site, but only as a one or two time join since the update rate is only one new scene per two months.
I am of the belief that Adult Time is stronger in its parts than sum. This site is one of those strong parts. |
|
06-08-21 10:46am
Replies (1)
|
Review
124
|
Cum Bang
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
More interracial gangbangs, this time it’s white guys with one black woman.
Only 95 scenes, but they do include a video and photos.
Hasn’t updated since January 2020.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
105 female models which surprises me since I didn’t notice any scenes with more than one woman.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller. |
| Cons: |
No updates hurts what is already a relatively small site.
Playing racial stereotypes in the older scenes including all the guys wearing shirts with confederate flags on them.
Older scenes video downloads are misleading, listed as Big HD, but are only 480p.
The story in the older scenes is almost always the same, the black woman’s black husband cheated on her so she’s getting revenge by gangbanging a group of white men -- including some that are much older.
4K versions of the videos cost $4 per scene |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
I believe a site like this one has more potential than the black guys on white woman gangbang sites do simply because you don’t see the group of white guys having sex with a black woman gangbang very often.
The racial stereotypes they play in the early scenes could possibly offend some people. The guys wear a shirt (some even have socks) with a confederate flag on it and the shirt says, “Dixie Stud - I would take one for the flag”. That follows the earlier setup of those scenes of the black woman’s black husband cheating on her. They did seem to drop the shirts (and socks) after a year of using it.
The scenes are still repetitive. They do seem to get a few scenes where maybe the woman is really into one of the guys and doesn’t switch. She will have sex with one guy for nearly the whole scene or half the scene while giving blowjobs and handjobs to the others. A lot of the older scenes are also very short considering there are 6-7 people in the scene, some as short as under 20 minutes. The newer scenes average more in the 30-40 minute range and there are some really pretty black women in these scenes.
I don’t know if they get much credit for the story since it doesn’t change much from scene to scene. The newer scenes have generic stories. I thought the best scene was Nia Nacci. She is having her 19th birthday and her white boyfriend walks in with a cake. She makes a wish and tells him what she wished for (19 cocks). The boyfriend motions and 18 more guys walk in.
You do get 1080p and 720p downloads on the majority of the videos and I liked this one a little better than most of the other sites just because of the different dynamic. |
|
02-26-21 05:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
125
|
Men On Edge
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s a site aimed at gay men, but I believe straight women can get as much enjoyment from it and can learn a few tricks.
Very unique and interesting theme that I am surprised isn’t tried more often with female models doing the edging to men.
Edging is the physical stimulation of a man’s dick until he is ready to cum, hence, men on edge.
Very attractive men if you are into masculine, hairy, well-hung and very erect.
327 scenes with new scenes being halted for Covid. Prior to Covid they were releasing 2-3 scenes per month. If that will continue in the future isn’t known.
I prefer long scenes and the scenes on this site are nearly an hour each. |
| Cons: |
They do some cosplay which could be off-putting to some. It’s usually themed based on a close holiday (zombie/monster at Halloween, Leprechaun at St. Patricks)
Some of the harder parts in the scenes can be hard to watch including poles/sticks up the butt. |
| Bottom Line: |
The act of edging is a highly underutilized niche in all porn. Including for females and males. It seems like torture for the person it’s being done to, but as long as the other person eventually lets them orgasm it is probably going to intensify the orgasm for them. I would like to find sites that have women edging men too.
The basic story of these scenes is one guy is going to torture the other guy in hard ways like the mentioned stick up the butt and in nicer ways like rubbing his dick or sucking it for him. It’s still torture since he will stop when the guy is nearing orgasm. You will see some ruined type orgasms where the dominant one stops, but the other still cums without any stimulation. Those kind of make me feel bad for the guy. I do enjoy the visuals of these scenes. You see men peaking with their dicks looking like they are ready to explode. You see pre-cum. You also will see a lot of throbbing. It’s very arousing even for a straight woman to watch.
There’s not a lot of sex in the scenes between the guys. It is mostly regulated to handjobs, blowjobs and they have “sucking machines” they use on each other. The name of it could be Men in Pain, but I do believe there is a site named that. Most of these guys look like they are ready to cry or die moments before they finally are allowed to cum.
This is achieved by having the man’s arms or even entire upper body tied up so he can’t reach down and bring himself to climax. I do believe this is a more shallow form of porn, but I also know I really like it and I think that’s all that really matters in the big picture.
They have 327 scenes with the last update being in April 2020. There is a note on the site that says they stopped filming when the pandemic started, so I am hoping they come back and start filming again. When the site first started in 2012 they were releasing a new scene everyday. That slowed to 2-3 updates per month. The videos’ top resolution is 720p and that goes back to 2012 too. These videos are not a typical 720p video. My monitor is set to 1080p and I watch these scenes in full screen. They are very clear on 1080p. I’m happy to make the exchange for hard drive space.
They have a few scene setups that are worth adding. It’s not unusual for the guy being tortured to start out in white and wet, tight boxer shorts. That’s a fetish of mine and those are my favorite scenes. It’s not often you see clothing fetishes on all-male sites, but they do work those in.
This is a “gay” site I am happy with and confident to recommend to straight women. I just wish I could find more content of women doing this underrated niche to men. |
|
09-28-20 10:19pm
Replies (0)
|
|
