| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Hegre
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- videos up to 4k
- good website structure
- payment system clear and comprehensible
- high end video quality – from lightning, to models and settings
- many different angles and positions
- action starts fast, no annoying intros |
| Cons: |
- no test-phase available
- they focus more on photos than other sites do (as of february 2020, there are more than 300 000 high resolution photos with download-option). I like that fact, but sometimes it was confusing wanting to watch a video but ending up in a picture gallery instead. A clearer separation could fix that.
- not much straight sex, mostly solo-action or lesbian sex
- sometimes too clean and 'perfect' |
| Bottom Line: |
- Hegre is named after famous photographer Petter Hegre. The tribute to him is visible in the way of explorating bodies with camera and light.
- Without exception, Hegre videos offer high end content with an artistic touch in terms of image-settings and action. Look, film style and website are of high quality and as if from one source.
- Models are all exceptionally beautiful.
- the videos definitely focus on the bodies of the models, so mostly everything has a clean style, e.g. a simple white background, like in a photo studio.
- Same goes for any audio-work. If ever, there's only some quiet mood music in the beginning of the videos, which i appreciate.
- Hegre seems to be a rather selective side. They offer fewer models, but present them in a greater variety of videos and photographs, which I think is a good concept.
- What I had already noticed on other sites, also applies to Hegre: For my taste, the videos sometimes just are too perfect. I think i just lacked more naturalness and am still searching for it.
- Given a paid subscription, an alternative site with more variety of models, body forms and actions could be worth thinking about. |
|
02-28-20 07:50am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2
|
Joy Bear
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Don't know the other sites yet, but will possibly take a look at them.
|
02-28-20 08:42am
|
Review
3
|
Joy Bear
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- clear website setup and design
- many different angles in the videos
- 'movies' are categorized by themes/practices
- mostly no lengthy intros, action starts quite fast
- no music when action |
| Cons: |
- no test-phase available, before signing up you can only watch trailers
- The registration process was annoying: when refreshing the registration window (because of using an already existing username), system automatically switched from a 1-month subscription to a 3-month subscription, so you had to be careful what you subscribe to.
- difference between „movies“ and „chapters“ in the navigation menu unclear.
- no information about total video-length
- confusing thumbnails before playback |
| Bottom Line: |
- Joybear is an award winning porn-site from the UK (e.g. winner of 'feminist porn award 2013')
- the website offers videos with different actions, mainly hetero-sex, three- to foursomes and lesbian sex, most of it soft style.
look seems high-end and professional.
- after a short introduction with the models voice-over giving hints about what to come, action starts quite fast.
- from then on there's usually no more music, only original sound, which i appreciate.
- chapter category is a nice feature, where 6 videos each are assigned to a superior so-called "movie", such as "Sex with friends", "Everyday Turn-Ons" or "Roommate".
- for me, at first I didn't get the structure of 'chapters' and 'movies'. It took me some minutes to figure out, that all 'chapters' belong to different 'movies', but can still only be viewed individually.
since both belong together, i find the division in the navigation menu misleading.
- I also definitely missed information about the video length. It's neither displayed before, nor during playback.
before clicking start on a video, a thumbnail of a different one is shown in the player which i find confusing.
- Even though there are differences in style and themes, you usually see slow, soft sex. If you're into a wider range in practices, Joybear probably isn't the best adress.
- the same goes for the actors: models are mainly slim, trained and shaved. |
|
02-19-20 03:03am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
4
|
Met Art X
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
- subtitles would work for the two-girl-action of course
- currently there are more than 815 videos online
|
02-12-20 01:27pm
|
Review
5
|
Met Art X
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- good website setup and elegant, clean design
- natural, pretty girls
- good lighting
- high video quality up to 4k
- film-like style, each video starts with credits and intro
- short description of content below each video |
| Cons: |
- only solo action, rarely two-girl action and never more than two
- no big variety in action
- beautiful girls, but mostly slim white girls and mostly fully shaved
soft music of the intro is annoying, music stops when action comes to peak
- Some intros feel way too long
- a few of the girls tend to act for the camera, especially in the beginning. I prefer it more natural.
- there's not much information about the models, i'd like more details about the personalities in front of the camera
- no german subtitles available |
| Bottom Line: |
- Met Art X belongs to the association of Met Art.
- The subpage of Met Art X focusses on female solo masturbation of which you can find a huge amount of around 815 videos as of today's date, february 2020.
- If you're into perfect girls enjoying themselves in a sensual and soft way, Met Art X is your adress. Girls are well casted and beautiful all over.
- For me, after some time, the site started to get boring. I found myself getting used to the look and content of the videos pretty fast: Everything is perfect and kind of clean, speaking from the bodies, to lighting, to the settings of the shoots – everything looks beautiful and professional, no question, but for me exactly that „cleanliness“ wore off pretty fast.
- I missed models with more curves and a generally wider range in bodies and ethnicity as well as a bigger range in different actions.
- The videos come with an intro, which gives some film-like character. Some of them managed to create a nice tension, whereas other intros felt way too long for me. Most annoying thing about the intros for me was the music. I'd definitely prefer real sound of the model instead of soft music.
- I won't extend my subscription, since i prefer porn sites of a wider range of look and content and more natural sex. |
|
02-11-20 07:40am
Replies (2)
|
|
