| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
And what does their support say?
|
11-21-07 06:04am
|
Reply
377
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Reply
I see, thanks. But in such videos girls don't talk much anyway, do they? And Seventeen has always been an European company, and they had never used US models (originally used Dutch, now East European - what's the big difference?) Or you mean that Dutch models did know English well, and East European don't? - that I can confirm, and that is indeed a problem in Seventeen chatroom, but IMHO not the biggest problem there.
|
11-21-07 06:03am
|
Reply
378
|
Sexy Goa
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
> The worst is the file-sizes. Some 1.3 Gb others up to 2,0 Gb for 20-25 minutes video.
Ouch, what is the bitrate then? 2G for 25 minute video should be around 10MBit/s, shouldn't it?
|
11-20-07 03:42pm
|
Reply
379
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Apple's Reply
Maybe it makes sense to leave a comment (but NOT review) titled like "Anybody wants to review this site (membership is FREE)?" - it would allow for unbiased review by somebody from this site (even better - by some known and trusted member of this community). I hope it won't be against PornUsers policies.
|
11-20-07 03:04pm
|
Comment
380
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
|
11-20-07 08:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
381
|
Nude in Public
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ original idea
+ real girls in nude on real streets
+ creativity (different scenarios and setups)
+ frequent updates
+ quite funny stories behind the shootings
+ rather active community |
| Cons: |
- videos are essentially teasers to get you buy full DVDs
- "Latest video update" is a video shot back in 2003
- no full scene videos at all
- almost no translation in videos
- video quality is very questionable (at 600kBit/s it looks like VHS; how do they sell DVDs with such quality?)
- thumbnails are so small that are almost useless
- picture quality is not so good (resolution is up to 1600x1200, but photographer's work is not up to resolution).
- design is a joke |
| Bottom Line: |
I like the idea of the site (real nude girls in real city streets and other real public places), but the site has VERY serious deficiencies. The most annoying thing for me was the fact that they're selling the same content twice (charging for it twice). When subscribing to the site, they say "220 Video Clips", but once you're inside you find that videos are just "Free bonus", and essentially are just teasers to get you buy full versions at their DVD shop (xxvideo.com, where videos are sold at $35/90-minute DVD + S&H). Yes, there can be about 220 clips inside, but each clip is mere 2 minutes long, they date back to 2003-2004 and are NOT full videos (DVD versions of the same thing are substantially longer), plus quality is questionable by modern standards to say the least (both resolution and cameraguy work are subpar).
As for pictures - the main annoyance is their ultra-small thumbnails, which makes seeing what's going on almost impossible. Also IMHO this kind of content is much less interesting in pictures than in video.
Bottom line:
Adding FULL videos and sorting out thumbnails could make it an excellent site (especially with such creative guys behind), but at current state I don't see much value in it except for the big fans of this very niche (and even for them buying the same but FULL content from xxvideo.com at $35/DVD could be a better choice). |
|
11-20-07 08:44am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
382
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
Wait, what site you're talking about? :-) ClubSeventeen or OnlyCuties?
|
11-19-07 04:36pm
|
Reply
383
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
TBP "Search niche" feature is a nice one (and it's a pity it doesn't exist in PU). Still, IMHO the very need for it illustrates that plain list of 94 items is useless, as it is very difficult to look through it to find what the user needs.
And disbalance is a bad thing exactly for this reason: the more garbage (which almost nobody's is interested in - see 'Balloons') you have at top level, the less useful it becomes for everybody else.
On the other hand, I don't think it makes sense to argue as you're already sure that it is done the best possible way, so could you please just add 'Search niche' feature to PU?
|
11-19-07 02:39pm
|
Reply
384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Ok, it's just another argument for subcategories: probably it should be like:
- Solo models
--- Masturbation
--- Dildos
--- Naked only
- Legs&Nylon
--- Pantyhose
--- Stockings
--- Foot fetish
...
Deal? :-)
|
11-19-07 05:25am
|
Reply
385
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> when i look for other things like mastrubating women or stocking
What about 'Solo Models' (what else they will do then masturbate? :-)) and 'Legs & Nylons'? So they ARE there :-), just worded differently, and I cannot blame you for not finding them, as carefully reading list of 94 items is frustrating at the very least. So the reason why you didn't find them is exactly because there are way too MANY of the niches (if there would be less B/S like Balloons, it would be easier to look through niche list and find things) :-). Subcategories (which I'm voting for) would also help it BTW.
|
11-19-07 05:01am
|
Reply
386
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> there can`t be enough "filtering" :)
What about "Balloons"? If all the niches will be 8 sites in size, like Balloons or a few others, there will be several thousands of niches, and I'd say it will be way too much of filtering; don't you agree?
|
11-19-07 04:25am
|
Reply
387
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Distant Lover's Reply
I see; it probably means tons of newbie review praising NewbieNudes here. Sigh.
|
11-19-07 02:37am
|
Reply
388
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Let me explain a bit. I've submitted this poll because I feel that current TBP/PU category/niche system is inadequate; there are 94 categories but they're VERY unbalanced: 'Hardcore' has 4000+ sites, 'Balloons' (what Balloons have to do with porn?) have only 8 sites, that's 500x difference.
So I feel that categories would be more useful if minor niches like 'Bukkake' (33 sites) or 'Cream Pies' (61 site) are merged (as subcategories) with bigger ones like 'Cumshots' (471 site). As for other examples - 'ATM' (13 sites) can be combined with 'Anal' (303 sites), 'Cheerleaders' (17) can go into 'Uniforms' (89), and 'Trampling' (18), 'Spanking' (99) and 'Smother' (16) will fit into 'BDSM' (317).
In this case 2-level category system would look as:
- CumShots
--- Bukkake
--- Cream Pies
- Anal
--- ATM
- BDSM
--- Trampling
--- Spanking
--- Smothering
|
11-19-07 01:14am
|
Reply
389
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Apple's Reply
> which occurs to me is an inherent feature of a "review"
Nope :-). There is a subtle difference between "subjective" and "biased". It is like making an experiment in science - measurement errors are inevitable (like subjectiveness in reviews/ratings), bias (both in science and reviews) can and should be avoided.
The other points you're raising can be valid, and I should mention that if original IDoctor's review would be written in these words rather than in original infomercial style, it would probably face less opposition.
|
11-19-07 12:56am
|
Reply
390
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Distant Lover's Review
May I ask how are you related to IDoctor99? 2 newbie reviews in single day cannot be a coincidence.
|
11-19-07 12:39am
|
Reply
391
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Reply
> obviously you can't seem to get your mind around the idea.
No, the idea of the site is obvious (there is nothing really new about it BTW), it is you who can't seem to get your mind around the idea of THIS site, and the idea of THIS site is about unbiased reviews. And your so-called review cannot possibly be unbiased because there is your content on the site (moreover, originally you've put your ID in your "review"). You've wrote in one of your replies: "of course I want to promote it to others." - THIS site is NOT about PROMOTING anything; it is about sharing information.
> It is my firm and honest belief that there are few, if any, porn sites offering a better experience on the web for anyone interested in such material.
Even if it is firm and honest, it is biased.
|
11-18-07 02:21pm
|
Reply
392
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Reply
> Whats the problem with finding a good thing and wanting to spread the word?
The problem is with creating your own content and trying to "review" it and put "rating" on it. Comment would be more appropriate for this kind of things (not exactly sure if even it would be ok with the spirit of the site, but in any case it would be better than fake review/rating).
> Can you guys be any more rude to somebody wanting to help out fellow porn watchers?
Sure we can, just ask about it politely enough.
|
11-18-07 01:18pm
|
Reply
393
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Reply
Even if you do not receive any money from the site, you admitted yourself that you want to get more people there; that means that your "review" is biased from the very beginning, and rating you put in you review is completely useless. It MIGHT be suitable as a comment (not sure).
|
11-18-07 12:45pm
|
Reply
394
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Reply
As I understand policy of this site, people affiliated with the site are not allowed to make reviews of the site they're affiliated with, because it cannot be anything but shilling.
|
11-18-07 09:26am
|
Reply
395
|
N/A
|
Reply of
kkman112's Reply
Movies on BitTorrent and other P2P networks? No thanks. I've got a feeling that most of movies there are pirated ones, and I've got another feeling that people making movies are entitled to get money for it.
About QT vs DivX/XVid - my experience with them was that QT is a stable product, which I cannot say about both XVid and DivX. QT original .MOV format is inferior to both WMV and MPEG-4, but as QT started to support MPEG-4 (including AVC) it became about the same quality/bandwidth-wise as WMV.
|
11-18-07 09:23am
|
Reply
396
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Review
> Leave me a comment and let me know you saw this review!
You're obviously shilling for the site, and this is not welcome here.
|
11-18-07 02:05am
|
Comment
397
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
|
11-18-07 02:00am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
398
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
> Shame there isn't someone with a website doing that over here, it would be great watching naked girls walk the street.
"Here" - you mean in US? I suspect that with this kind of stuff there can be some legal issues; anyway if any of US/UK webmasters is reading this conversation, please register my vote for it too :-).
|
11-18-07 01:56am
|
Reply
399
|
N/A
|
Reply of
kkman112's Reply
> A LOT of videos now-a-days are encoded using it and it is a really good file format.
Let's look at TBP: 6200+ sites provide WMV and only 566 DivX (plus 84 XVid whatever it means); and of those which provide DivX most provide WMV too (I took a random sample and 7 out of 10 sites with DivX also provided WMV), which leaves us with about 3% of sites with DivX and without WMV. Not that much IMHO.
As for format: DivX/XVid = MPEG-4, right? Then QuickTime7 (which I have anyway) is supposed to play it; I'm wondering if it really can do it; do you know link of any free clip in DivX/XVid so I can try it (or maybe if you have QuickTime you can try it yourself and tell)?
|
11-18-07 01:53am
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> is there really someone who havent got all codecs? :)
Me for instance. I hate installing all the garbage that comes with codecs, having to deal with adware/spyware, Windows slowing down to a crawl and/or starting to crash on regular basis. On my main laptop, I have ONLY WMP, QT and Flash plug-in, that's it; not even DivX/XVid. if the site has something different - usually it's tough luck for them, unless they have something REALLY special.
Interesting that this "REALLY special site with non-standard codecs only" didn't happen to me at least during last 2-3 years; I've noticed that usually sites that like things like XVid/DivX are Russian (or other 3rd-world) ones and there is usually nothing to see anyway :-).
|
11-17-07 03:30am
|
