Sex WITH real excitement, at least once in a while
I was asked to express my "expert opinion" on the disagreement between FuckingGambler and BabyGetReal about excitement in FuckingGamble games, and wasn't able to resist the temptation to pose as an "expert" :-), so here go my two cents.
I've took a closer look at game 4 which FuckingGambler is referring to, and IMHO it has much more passion and much more excitement from sex between the models then 99% of all the porn out there. To compare it to DareRing (which BabyGetReal refers to) I've even took a look at my old clips from Dare Ring (hey, now I know why I store all that old stuff :-)) to compare, and found that despite obviously more "amateur" feeling of "Dare Ring", I've felt that FuckingGamble's game 4 players shown significantly more "excitement" about sex then DareRing players (DareRing guys and girls were way too nervous, especially towards the end of the game, which obviously didn't help their excitement). And what is quite obvious to me now is that action is indeed NOT scripted on both DareRing and FuckingGamble (at least because writing and learning all those lines would be an absolute nightmare).
That said, I should add that not all the games on FuckingGamble are made equal. Some (like game 4, game 14, or the most recent game 26) are IMHO very emotional and show real "chemistry" (as FuckingGambler puts it) between the players, but some are less successful in this regard. In addition, I should add that all the above is just my personal opinion, so if your opinion differs, please don't hit me too hard :-).
For 4RealAmateurs, there is a sister site 4RealSwingers, about which I even wrote a review some time ago. Now TBP/PU don't seem to list 4RealSwingers anymore, but the site itself (4RealSwingers.com) is still alive. It might be a clone (no idea if it is a clone or not), but you guys usually keep even clones listed (especially those ones with reviews).
Brazzers home page at the moment of this post says: "Now in FULL HD", and "Join now and embrace the future with the best HD experience". If you click on "Join now...", you will get to "Join page", with prices. But there is NOTHING to tell you, that when you pay, you will NOT get this HD stuff they were talking about, but will need to pay EVEN MORE to get it.
============================================== Brazzers Credits (New)
Prefill your account with Brazzers Credits and use them to purchase Brazzers merchandise and much more.
Currently you can spend your credits on:
Unlocking HD 720p/1080p videos for download
Coming Soon:
Upgrade your membership to elite status
Unlock scenes before they are released!
Buy Brazzers merchandise(t-shirts and baseball caps)
Buy Brazzers Credits Today And Recieve 20% More Credits!
Elite Membership Status
If you have had a brazzers membership for 6 uninterrupted months, you are automatically an Elite member and entitled to view and download every available HD 720p/1080p scene we offer.
==============================================
I shall say I HATE this kind of squeezing money out of me (especially when it's kind of stuff which goes for free elsewhere).
PU says that rating for TheTrainingOfO is 94, but there are only 2 reviews, one is 95, and another is 90, so I expect it to be 92.5. Ok, I know that there are ratings and so on, so I went to "Feedback History" and found that's it's 92.5 there. So it's 94 on site page, and 92.5 in "Feedback History". Not that it really matters much, but which one is correct?
This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on https://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".
Review of non-member area: looks not bad, decent preview and I while I struggle to believe that they have 500hrs of HD video (!) within theme, it's still possible if they have non-exclusive content. But their sign-up page with $1 trial has another PRE-CHECKED "special" (this time not from Epoch, but from 365billing) conveniently rebilled at $29.95/month. Arrrrrrgh!
This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on https://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".
Review of non-member pages: not much to say, no even tour page, promising DAILY updates (I don't believe it, do you?), and as a final touch, they're proposing "Join for free" combined with one of infamous PRE-CHECKED offers by Epoch (auto-renewing at $39.95 or so). That's what I call unethical.
From http://www.nolimitweb.nl/terms.htm :
"The occurrence of complaints from Customers, inquiries, Credit Backs or Charge Backs with respect to the Client's program or service may be cause for termination of this Agreement if such events occur with unacceptable frequency as determined in the sole discretion of the Company. In addition, The Company reserves the right to charge the Client reasonable fees and recover its expenses on account of Credit Backs, Charge Backs, or excessive customer inquiries." - have anybody seen anything like this? These guys seem to reserve the right to charge members as much as they wish, at their sole discretion.
This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on https://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".
Ok, here goes the price of reviewing RANDOM sites :-(. But to maintain experiment as clean as possible I shouldn't avoid even as filthy stuff as this is (sorry guys who love it, it's not my cup of... oh, forget it).
Review of non-member area of the site is easy: there is only one page, so there isn't that much to see, but there is a movie on this page, so it isn't that uninformative after all. There are very few promises on this page, so there aren't much things to break (except for content being filthy enough, which is somewhat confirmed by sample WMV), but there is one interesting thing there in their "Terms and Conditions" (http://www.nolimitweb.nl/terms.htm , see my other comment to this site for a quote). I have no idea if some provisions was EVER used by them, or if similar conditions are present for any of the other sites, but this is IMHO nothing short of outrageous (they seem to reserve the right to charge members at the site discretion).
Bottom line: not only content is filthy, Terms and Conditions are not less filthy and I would stay away from sites with such Terms and Conditions at any cost.
This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on https://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".
Results of reviewing non-member area: according to TBP it is a clone of a well-established site, and looks pretty much like expected for such a site. It has everything needed for this kind of site: ability to search clips, purchases of time from $3.95 to $84.95, streaming/rental/download/XXX-to-Burn and so on.
Bottom line: while I'm not being fan of streaming and DRM, if you're ok with it, can be not too bad (especially considering "XXX to Burn" feature). Chances of being unethical are estimated as "very low".
This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on https://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".
Results of review of non-member area: looks somewhat more "fishy" than, for example, previously reviewed Nina Wonder. This girl claims she's from St. Louis, Missouri (and I have some doubts about it), says about live-cam girls (which might be true), says there are hundreds of "friends" sites within (and while it implies that they're included into membership, I'm not so sure about it being true; not even clear if membership includes access to 16 sites of Roller Girl 2000 mentioned by TGP).
Bottom line: IMHO quite high risk of it being pretty much a scam, with only a few hundred of pics and nothing else for this price.
This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on https://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".
Results of review of non-member area: looks as more or less typical individual model site, with not that much content, but providing access to a few dozens of other similar sites.
Bottom line: if you're REALLY into amateur girls, could even be interesting (though more research of affiliated sites will be needed). About being unethical - this site doesn't promise much, and most likely keeps its promises.
This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on https://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".
Results of review of non-member area: looks decent (assuming you like this kind of stuff). Action as advertised, with photo and video samples. Dated updates would help, but still impression is not too bad.
Bottom line: if I would be a fan of this stuff, I could consider joining myself. About being unethical: they don't promise much (except for machine content which is shown right there), and seem to deliver at least not less then they explicitly promise. Moreover, even though they're using Epoch (infampous for it's PRE-CHECKED cross-sellings), this site does NOT use them, kudos to site webmaster and/or owners.
This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on https://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".
Results of review of non-member area. Good: action as advertised. Bad: pop-up on home page, link "preview video-clip" leads to "join", quality of pics isn't too good.
BEWARE: pre-checked cross-selling "special offer" for another site by Epoch.
Bottom line: risky and probably not updated, but BIG fans may still want to try. About being unethical - site doesn't promise much, so there isn't much to break, but PRE-CHECKED cross-sale is IMHO an unethical practice.
This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on https://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".
Results of review of non-member area: girls are ugly, but suck lollipops as advertised. Comment is advertised as exclusive, and looks so (confirmed by TGP review). Updates are advertised as one per week, and it was confirmed by TGP back then, but without dated updates it doesn't look that they're still updating the site.
Bottom line: if you're REALLY into this fetish, you might want to risk it despite girls being outright ugly and probable lack of updates. Chances of site being "unethical": IMHO, quite high because of updates.
This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on https://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".
Results of reviewing non-member area: Link to "tour" leads to the same page. Link to http://www.crazydrunkgirls.com/ doesn't work at all. Not much promises (except for "full length videos" and access to 50 more sites). Their page states that "PaycomEU.net/Epoch.com/EPOCHEU.COM"; is their "authorized sales agent", but billing is done by "AdInHelp.com".
Bottom line: you should be crazy drunk to join this site, but IMHO because of not much promises they make it doesn't look likely they're essentially unethical.
From preview areas PlugHerHoles and 18inchesOfPain look VERY different. So either one of them is outright lying in their preview, or they are NOT clones. Any further info will be appreciated.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
