| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Just now read your message. Only thing I'd caution you is if you go back to RK and use the link, make sure you are using internet explorer as your browser. I had problems getting the link to work in Firefox.
|
09-23-10 12:31pm
|
Reply
127
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Monahan just do a Google search for Bangbros $9.95, also works for RK, and Brazzers.
|
09-13-10 10:28pm
|
Reply
128
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
You may have to wait for the loyalty bonus, you get more sites the longer you stay a member.
|
08-18-10 12:43pm
|
Reply
129
|
Sock Blocked
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I ain't gonna lie it looks damn good, but I'm not really into socks like that. I wish a site like this would launch with a foot fetish focus that would be right up my alley
I like the fact they have North American models, if they had more foot fetish i'd drop my subscription to foot fetish daily (will anyway) and sign up here in a heartbeat despite the lack of an archive for now.
They've got better girls, plus no arbitrary ban on breast implants.
|
08-18-10 12:40pm
|
Reply
130
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
It's a good network, I'm basically off/on again from time to time. Currently I'm on it primarily for nudefightclub and footsiebabes.
|
08-04-10 10:15am
|
Reply
131
|
Ghetto Gaggers
(0)
|
Reply of
vouivre62's Comment
That's a damn shame
|
08-03-10 08:37pm
|
Reply
132
|
Nicoletta Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
I could understand this better if there was not both a Mature and Milf designation. In my opinion Milf really should mean 28-35 yrs old, basically motherhood age (at least in the modern era or last 40 yrs).
Mature out to mean anything past 36 yrs old, or beyond normal childbearing age. Now I could see this site being under the Milf category-although I still think she's a bit too young for that-but no way is she mature.
If she's now mature, when was she a "Milf", at 23?
This matters, because when I go searching for new "mature" sites I don't feel like wading through a bunch of 25-26yr olds to get to what I'm looking for.
It's almost like saying a chic like Melissa Midwest is "mature", I'd bet anything she's around the same age by now.
|
07-31-10 10:22pm
|
Reply
133
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
I made a comment about this earlier. You say 6 years behind. You are being far too kind. Take a look at Bangbros, or Brazzers videos from 2004-2005,there is no comparison, the video quality here is stuck at 2002-2003 levels.
I know the site launched in 2004 but they started out as a streaming only site, and therefore I think in order to cater to the online speeds of most people around that time had to downgrade their content. In other words good quality video would have been too much for most people to stream effectively.
They (reluctantly) made the switch to allow downloads only a few years ago. However they have never made anything except for very modest upgrades to the video quality. They also still seem to have that archaic download (with serious difficulties downloading even one video).
Like you said though the actual content is quite hot, these guys actually have a knack for producing compelling videos, especially with their teen sites, but they do a good job across the board in terms of site concepts, direction, camera work, models etc. I even love the hell out of their pic sets.
If these guys had 720hd or even high quality wmv downloads they would be mentioned in the same breath as Brazzers, Bangbros, RK, ect. Yet they refuse to change with the times.
It just makes you kinda scratch your head, because they while keep falling farther and farther behind, they still through out a few updates a month and have been operating this way for a least a couple of years. You'd think they'd just throw in the towel.
My theory is they get a lot of mileage out their excellent photography (although the pics still aren't big enough), which they can still throw up on free tpg sites and get enough guys who don't know any better to sign up for a month.
|
07-31-10 06:38pm
|
Reply
134
|
Sock Blocked
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I don't think you'll get anyone that's been a member yet since they just launched this month.
|
07-31-10 06:04pm
|
Reply
135
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I've been a member here many times, last time was early this year. I can't really speak to the negative reviews, but I've never had any problems personally with them.
Also I'm not sure why people have said they are no longer updating, my experience has been they have always updated every day or at least several times a week. They have never hid their update schedules and the dates are openly visible.
Also never had any problems with billing, they've used Epoch for at least the past year who is reputable biller. When I wanted to quit it was just like any other site.
Finally to the poster who mentioned that they get rid of certain sites completely that is a legitimate gripe. Although let's face it these guys basically are about taking chances as far as site concepts are concerned and there should be at least some recognition of that. When you take chances as they have done it's possible that you will sometimes fail miserably as perhaps a site like sleep creep had done.
Porn is a business at the end of the day and perhaps sleep creep had such little interest that it didn't make sense to keep even the archive intact. However it's not like they advertise sleep creep on their front page and when you get in it is not there (at least not when I checked).
I actually still have a link for this site at $9.95 a month to anyone interested (among a few others) send me an email.
|
07-31-10 05:47pm
|
Comment
136
|
Nicoletta Nude
(0)
|
|
07-31-10 05:23pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
137
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Shasta90418's Comment
I have also had major problems with their biller. I also disagree about customer service, my experience has been hit or miss with them.
|
07-21-10 01:29pm
|
Reply
138
|
Black Ice Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
All of the Zero Tolerance sites are high up on my radar as far as new sites to try, I just simply haven't gotten around to it.
|
06-02-10 07:05pm
|
Reply
139
|
Foot Fetish Daily
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
This is a good review, you make a lot of good points. However, in comparing Foot Fetish Daily to Hot Legs and Feet, I personally prefer Foot Fetish Daily.
If your were to compare the two sites on paper there is no question Hot Legs and Feet is superior and from that standpoint I see where you are coming from. The models are hotter, more HD, more content overall.
However for me two things, first there is no question that European models are hotter on-the-whole, but I prefer North American models, and finding North American models in high quality Foot Fetish stuff is somewhat rare, even these days. (I mean if you think about it most of the high quality foot related sites are European based.) I like the idea of taking the same girls you see on other more mainstream sites and putting them in foot related scenes.
Second, Foot Fetish Daily just has more personality and fun, it has an informal 'round the house' type feel to it, plus the interaction between the members and webmasters/directors is unparalleled, at least in my experience.
Don't get me wrong, I like Hot Legs and Feet and will probably return to it some time soon, however Foot Fetish Daily for me is a permanent fixture in my porn budget. I came to the conclusion that if I had money for only one site, Foot Fetish Daily would be it.
|
05-30-10 09:41am
|
Reply
140
|
My Deep Dark Secret
(0)
|
Reply of
TangoMike's Comment
Sorry to hear about your experience, but this site is a bad choice to me anyway, it's like a poor man's version of blacksonblondes, and there are even other sites/networks that do a better job or simply have a greater archive.
|
05-29-10 11:57pm
|
Reply
141
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
Karasek's Review
I like the girl, and even kind of like the softcore. Problem is she only goes topless and that's it. Even though I like the model, that's not enough for me.
|
05-29-10 11:02pm
|
Reply
142
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I agree 100% with this review, I also bit on the whole 'combining of both sites' deal. Unfortunately quantity does not outweigh quality when it comes to porn.
The photographers on this site are the worst, they seem to have an obsession with close ups and gynecological lessons. As you say there are some diamonds in the ruff but you have to wade through so many poor and mediocre shoots to get to them.
Sites like allover30 blow auntjudy's away despite having less than half their archive.
|
05-29-10 10:44pm
|
Reply
143
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Facial Abuse.
|
05-21-10 04:30pm
|
Reply
144
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
I already took advantage of this deal on another site a while back, I'd say it's worth it. RK's backlog and diversity is more than worth $10 a month. Not my favorite site by any means but certainly worth the price here.
|
05-21-10 04:28pm
|
Reply
145
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I've personally never had a problem with any of the Score sites, and yes I was just recently a member of Score HD. I think the main reason they don't list the billing company on TBP is because they use so many different ones.
For instance, I think I've been a member of Score HD twice, the first time in December it was through Epoch, the second time earlier this year it was through Net billing. I've now canceled Score HD (not because it isn't good). However I still have a running membership to Scoreland which is billed through CCbill (from my checking account)
Score is a pretty reputable company, however you do need to be wary of the cross sells when signing up.
|
04-12-10 06:52pm
|
Comment
146
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
|
|
03-15-10 01:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
147
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
|
01-27-10 10:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
148
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
|
01-08-10 05:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
149
|
Shemale Strokers
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
LOL, it's all good man, I just took as a friendly debate anyway. And there is no question you are the preeminent authority when it comes to TS sites. I joined Shemale Club based primarily on your review!! (I had been a member before but you influenced me to go back.
And no unfortunately Rodney doesn't do TS but it's clear just from the site design that he has some ownership of it since it's exactly the same as his network. Really if they would just combine the two networks under one umbrella I would join in heartbeat.
I still may get try that site, but probably my next shemale site will be Shemale Asia (again based off your review) or maybe Shemale Yum (I still haven't been a member their either.
As an aside- I replied to your thread regarding Brazzers and it would be cool to get your take on it. Plus there is a rare link for the site at $9.95 I know it's not your thing. but it's a pretty good value at that price even without the HD.
|
12-30-09 07:00pm
|
Reply
150
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Reply
Damn your the man for keeping that link, it's still advertising updates from 2008!!! That's like finding a four leaf clover! You better not let that out at too many places lest they take it down (which I'm sure they will at some point).
I've already been a member for like two years at that price but I'm still keeping that link just in case something goes wrong. I'm pretty sure they aren't offering that discount just for canceling anymore.
And for those not sure it is $9.95 recurring.
|
12-30-09 06:21pm
|
