Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Darker, artsy, not for sure about deeper.
- Edgy niche-driven porn.
- Only the best of the best of professional models are on this site.
- 4k downloadable videos and downloadable zip photos (very good photos!)
- Download speed is good (80% my max)
- No-fuss navigation
Cons:
- The 25 scene download limit is bad when you hear it but I haven’t found it to be restrictive to me and my downloading habits.
- They advertise all their other sites.
Bottom Line:
Weirder, darker, quirkier, can you see that porn is running out of ways to describe itself as edgy? What is edgy porn? It’s porn that not only simulates your physical desires but also shakes up your emotional and even mental sides. Edgy porn rarely works for everyone. It still requires the viewer to be open to it and to even use some familiar fantasies the viewer can recall.
I think Deeper would be taken more seriously if not owned by Mad Cheddar. The same producers that bring us the highly-repetitive Blacked, Tushy and Vixen sites. Repetitive, as I have talked about, is not always a bad thing. We are after all still watching porn featuring naked people. Every scene in the history of porn does that but I’m not calling it repetitive.
The site that does edgy porn better than anyone is Kink. Their sites like Divine Bitches and Public Disgrace touches on all of my sexual interests. Deeper has some scenes that do that too but overall, I would score it just below Pure Taboo.
The Mad Cheddar sites guarantee high quality, near industry-leading even and they deliver. Navigation is what I call no-fuss. You can’t really even intentionally mess the navigation up. It’s the simple and basic. You’ll find what you’re looking for without looking for the right thing. And the 25 scene per month download limit. It’s easy to divide that number into the total number of scenes to see how many months one would have to be a member to get all the scenes but here’s what I do … I don’t have to download every scene! Having the 25 scene limit causes me to be more selective and make sure the scene is something I want to keep on my hard drive. Maybe that limit even touches on our rebellious need to rebel against rules? Some hidden BDSM going on between the site and the user? Just kidding … maybe.
There are nearly 250 scenes and picture sets. You can do the math, you’re going to need about 10 months of membership to download everything. It makes me wonder if these sites willl stop updating once they reach 350ish videos which would require a year membership to download all of them?
It is a sign of the times and state of the porn industry, we are talking as much about the business practices than the actual porn. The good part about Deeper is you can take your time and find the scenes you really want. Many of the scenes have parts I like but then an entire segment I fast forward. I don’t see a reason to download those scenes.
Also keeping in tune with the other Mad Cheddar sites, the models are clearly professional and are very attractive. That is the other selling point of this site, the scenes are exclusive and it’s likely the only way you’re going to see some of the models doing very hardcore scenes.
Now, about the name of the site? Deeper? I think it’s saying their porn is deeper or more complex than other sites but I don’t agree. It is a very good site, similar to Pure Taboo if you like It but still falling short of the Kink sites. It’s a worthy site for a monthly join just to take a look at and enjoy the best scenes they have.
I joined this site after finding out they had a few Eve Angel sets that I don't have. Including a really good Eve/Mia Stone g/g set that has plenty of kissing and touching. I really think Mia and Eve had a thing for each other, or really are very close friends, as they work great together.
The only problem, this is supposed to be a site about virgins, real virgins, Eve Angel, Mia Stone, real virgins. Say it again and you see the problem. The content isn't bad at all, but most of the models are models I have never heard of, maybe they are the virgins?
All I will keep from this site is the Eve and Mia sets and it will set you back around $40 US, since it is 26 in Euros. The pictures didn't even come in zips, the videos vary from one episode to the next but do have good 1500 bitrates. The ones I have kept range from 440 high end to 640 high end.
If I were rating it, the score would be low 70s and not recommended except to those looking to complete collections of models they have.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very good as a standalone site, great when throwing in the bonus sites.
- Price is more than acceptable, could have sworn I paid more last year, price is now $14.95.
- Videos on this site are 720 high end, 2000+ bitrate.
- Download speeds are above average for me
- If you like their models, this is probably a better join than 99% of the video sites since these are somewhat exclusive, will explain.
- Webmaster blogs for all to read and tells about new coming videos, plus has a pretty entertaining humor section.
Cons:
- Trying to download more than a few files at a time, does not work, download managers that I have tried don't work.
- Like some other video sites they have added some pictures, but no zips, and small resolution makes the pictures all but pointless.
- Download speed seems to slow in the evenings PST
- Updates can be frustrating, one scene per day, not one whole DVD, but one scene from a DVD per day. Wait until your membership runs out with one scene left that you want to add to make a full DVD and you will know why this is a con.
Bottom Line:
I've been to this network several times of the last few years. I was always a fan of the Silverstone DVDs, since they have some pretty rare Eve Angel hardcore scenes, plus some of Sky Lopez's best work, but after the first visit, the newer scenes just aren't as interesting.
Why I like that they have them on separate sites is that it is nice to be able to go to the Tera Patrick site without having to search for her videos, and seeing that at least 4 of those sites do not interest me, it means I don't have to sift through. Most networks just throw together as many sites as possible, even if the content is virtually the same from site to site.
The quality on the videos are good on each site. Each one has 720 high end with the 2000+ bitrate, those bitrates do vary a little. I have a few that have 2800 bitrates from here, others have 2000-2100, but still 2000 is very good to start with.
Besides those few I mentioned with Eve and Sky, having 50+ DVDs that star Tera Patrick is worth $15 to me. As she is one of my all-time favorites. You also get the official Silvia Saint site with a similar amount of her starring DVDs. Those solo ones to me are worth joining for a month. Just be sure to check out Silverstone, these are also available on the Brain Pass network but are split into pieces. On the Silverstone site, included with a membership to Devil's Film, you get full scenes, which is much better.
Overall, I see no way that if you are fan of video porn, hardcore, Silvia or Tera that you should skip this site. It is recommended really for all porn fans. The TBP price is a definite selling point.
Recommended about as highly as I can. Especially if you have never been a member.
I just joined this a week ago, and have really enjoyed it so far. I noticed the talk of download managers, I'm going to tell you all what I do. Try Opera browser, I use Firefox for everything else, but Opera is working great on here and other sites that didn't let me use a download manager. The way I understand it is that unlike Firefox's download manager, the Opera one starts every download you put in it, even if only at 2 kb/s, this must clear you to download the file so you don't have to sign back in like most sites that won't let you use download managers.
I've really enjoyed the jokes on this site as well, kind of reminds me of the old days of looking at Hustler and reading the jokes in it with the Beaver sitting on the toilet laughing.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Maybe a different take on Interracial gangbangs than we’re used to.
- Five categories to separate the different types of gangbangs, that’s where the different take comes in for me.
- Not a lot of video download options but all the videos have 540, 720 and 1080 resolution downloads. No 4K but I don’t mind that.
- Downloadable photosets that are better than expected.
- Download speeds are good (75-80% of my max).
- From what I can tell it’s updating about twice per month.
Cons:
- That update schedule may not be right. I am basing the number of scenes they have compared to the last TBP review. They have averaged 2 per month.
- One of the most barebones, basic sites I’ve ever seen and it’s not a network even though network is in the name.
- It’s not all gangbangs either.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those sites that you join when you’re tired of Dogfart. It’s a little different than what you probably expect. It was for me at least. Lets go into the very basic site design. The tabs they have are “videos” which also serves as a dropdown menu to pick the category you want and “models” that’s it. They do have tags on the scenes that you can click and find other scenes with the same tag. The download options on the videos are good. I am at the point that I’m not interested in 4K videos. I just mention it in my reviews if a site has 4K. This one offers 540p, 720p and 1080p on all their videos. There are 242 scenes, those each have a video and photoset. I haven’t hit a download limit.
The categories add a lot to the review, I think. The categories are “Matures”, “Teens”, “Castings”, “Cuckolds” and “Grannies”. I was expecting more gangbangs. The tags don’t exactly help me out as much as I would like. They have a gangbangs tag and a group-sex tag. There are 28 group or gangbangs. I think the big selling point here is the mature and granny scenes. They have around 80 of the mature interracial and around 40 of the granny interracial. The cuckold category makes me wonder about the group-sex tag. It’s a supposed to be husband or boyfriend with his girlfriend or wife and a black guy. That’s group-sex to me. But those are not tagged as group-sex. If you’re into cuckold porn this is some very realistic-looking cuckolding. I don’t want to say it goes into bisexual men but the husband/boyfriend does often give the wife oral while the black guy is having anal sex with her. You know the old saying about the greasy slit it only an inch from the asshole. This is very kinky for those into kinky. There are parts where the husband’s tongue touches the black guy’s dick and the husband licks the cum up and then shares it with the wife. I think they may be missing a possible interested audience in those who like bisexual men. I know it’s not full bisexual sex between the men but you’re going to get really close in these cuckold scenes. There is no bisexual tag. I don’t know if cuckolding automatically assumes bisexual. Those scenes if you’re into that are very believable.
On the updates, the newest scene was released in August of this year. The one before that was in May of this year. The TBP review and facts update list the scenes as 218 in November 2019. They have added 24 in the last 22 months, so it’s more like one new one per month. I do think the rarity of these types of scenes and overall size of the site makes up for it. I haven’t seen porn like this. That’s mostly the cuckolding that I’m talking about. Where it is different than most interracial gangbang sites is the gangbang and group sex often has one or two black guys and one or two white guys in it too. It doesn’t just go with only black guys in those. I do not know any of these models. The models, for the most part, (not the grannies) are attractive enough. These look like amateur models but a few of the names make me think I’ve heard of them like Alex Black. She looks familiar. It’s definitely different than the typical interracial site. What I will also point out is something several reviewers have talked about. The bad part about having group or gangbangs is it takes away from the one on one scenes. I do think that’s a slight problem on this site. Besides the gangbangs and group-sex, those cuckolding scenes, that’s quite a bit of kinkiness. When you switch it back to one on one you lose the kinkiness.
To me that is going to be the selling point or audience this should be aimed at. Those into kinkiness and cuckolding, gangbangs and group-sex. Of course, if you’re into grannies then you can add those too. I guess that’s kinky too. It’s not for me. It’s a good site with very good technical quality. The simplicity of the site will make it look a little drab but it’s also easy to use and there’s not a lot obstructing your views of the previews. It’s a site that surprised me.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site of legendary photographer J. Stephen Hicks, who I mostly knew from Penthouse.
- You have to know what you’re getting into here, 1,737 videos and these are softcore videos. (Will go into in bottom line). The videos are downloadable and the newer ones have 4K.
- Nearly 4,000 photosets and those are downloadable with the resolution topping out at 3000 long end.
- Some of the prettiest models in the world. You probably could guess that with J. Stephen Hicks background.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max)
- Here’s the big news: It’s now included in Adult Prime. I talked about this network last month. This network is making some waves when you add one of the top glam/softcore sites.
- It is still updating, looks like 3-4 photosets per week and the videos are updating very slow. There were 3 in November. (I will go into that in the bottom line too)
- Seamless navigation, how did they pull that off?
Cons:
- It’s going to be too softcore for some.
- The videos even though there is masturbation are very short. Most are under 10 minutes. There’s no lesbian, there’s no male/female.
Bottom Line:
I think this is a big deal to see Digital Desire on a network that I was just talking about has been overlooked. I’ll say the seamless navigation. That could have been a big problem when adding a site like this to a network. What they have done, Digital Desire has its own navigation panel below the network’s navigation panel. When you search Digital Desire’s models it only shows you the models on Digital Desire. A lot of networks have a problem with running their navigation into a site’s navigation. Someone knows what they’re doing.
I think the videos on Digital Desire are underrated. These are not furious masturbation videos. These are women teasing, touching, dildos and masturbating in sexually provocative ways. That’s kind of up my alley, my alley isn’t downhill. I’m just going to pick a random one out that the screencap got my attention. It’s a pretty, blonde named Taylor. You know I picked randomly, or it wouldn’t have been a blonde. She is taking a shower and it turns into her noticing the shower head is hitting all the right places and she doesn’t lose control or start yelling or moaning loudly. It looks real. That is what I always believed was the strength behind this style of porn. You don’t have the model that’s screaming and letting you know they are on a porn set and not really in their at-home bathroom. Nearly all the videos on Digital Desire have this style to them. I don’t want to use the word erotic for some reason but that is what comes to mind. She just accidentally realized she was aroused and did something about it. I enjoy these videos more in 2021 than I did 10 years ago. It’s a nice change of pace from 2021 porn. I should mention outside of a few sites, I don’t think good, new porn has come around in the last decade. I know a lot of our members have similar taste as I have. You should check it out especially with the network it comes with.
The photosets are exactly what you would expect. It’s like looking through an extended penthouse or playboy explicit photo pictorial. It has that classy feel to it. No is going to be offended by anything on here. Unless you wanted to be there to watch. I even like that this network keeps a fairly universal style to their downloads no matter which site it’s on. Digital Desire’s videos can be downloaded in 480p, 720p, 1080p and the newer videos have 4K. I think the ones below 480p is underkill/overkill. I know that those are made for mobile but aren’t most mobile devices 1080p resolution? I’m not the most up to date on cellphones. I do have an iPhone XS and it’s a little over 1080p. Those that know me and my obsessiveness, you know that I’m happy to just see 3-4 download options instead of 8-10.
The models on this site are probably well-known. I don’t know a lot of newer models. There are nearly 1,300 models. I see big names like Aaliyah Love, Abigail Mac, one of my favorites in Adrianna Luna. I will even add a few of the more classic models that you can get here. Aria Giovanni has 23 photosets and 8 videos. Kyla Cole has 48 photosets and 2 videos. Kyla was one of the earliest internet model sensations, really pretty woman and eyes, if you haven’t seen her. One of my all-time favorites, I had no idea she had content on here is Charmane Star with 17 photosets and 9 videos. One that only a few probably remember, the mindblowing, Veronica Zemanova with 24 photosets and 3 videos. This is easily a standalone site that has made it for years on its own and you now receive it with a full network.
The site is highly recommended for those of us that wonder what happened to our porn we remember? I found some! Very impressed with the integration into the network. As long as this network keeps going they have a very bright future.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Great TBP deal of Digital Desire and DDGX for $22.99
- Some of the finest photography you will see on the internet. Resolution does vary though.
- Just about every top model you can name is on this site from Aria Giovanni to my favorite Eve Angel to Sandra Shine to Shay Laren.
- DIVX clips are HD but....you already know (See cons)
- DDGX has the more hardcore content on it, at one time these were separate sites, now you get both.
Cons:
- DRM on videos
- Inconsistent resolutions from week to week on pic sets
Bottom Line:
First, if the webmaster for Digital Desire reads this, please take my advice and remove the DRM. I say this for a major reason beyond the obvious one. Most of the videos are not what I would even call keeper clips. The clips are good for one, maybe two viewings, after that I tired of them. This is, first and foremost a photography site and they do it as well as just about any site. The photos are why I join the site.
Which is the other reason that I spoke of earlier about removing the DRM. I have to wonder just how many people will never join this site to see the excellent top level photography just because of the DRM on videos? I understand the reason for DRM, but on the other hand, we can't go around letting a few bad apples ruin it for the rest of us. I even wonder if the missed new subscribers hurts worse than those few who share porn?
I really enjoyed this site and want to score it higher, up near 95, as one of my favorites and best in class in the glamour field, but I can't because of the DRM. I had read Drooler's review and since I hadn't been a member before, I figured the site would be fresh to me and it was. I will still probably come back in 6 months and join again for a month. The videos are crisp HD, which pisses me off even more about the DRM. The site navigates good enough, high res photos, zips, tons of the world's top models. All of it almost seems wasted since so many won't join because of the DRM. I highly recommend it, but remember DRM.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 15 site network that includes some older, classic sites that I haven't seen in years.
- Newer scenes include 4K downloads (last 5 years).
- Quite a few new and newer sites that are typical of today's porn landscape (stepfamily, sensual, brutal).
- It's updating as a network around 12-13 updates per month even though some of the sites have stopped updating.
- Download speeds are very good.
- The PU discount really helps with this network because you're going to feel like you need to also need to join 18 Videoz network, which is owned by the same company.
- A little more variation on this network with the niches.
- Has one of Europe's most classic sites on it, Young Courtesans
Cons:
- You're really going to feel like some of these sites are connected to sites on the 18 Videoz network. You can even look at the names, Young Courtesans on one network and Young Libertines on the other. Giving them a break since they are giving a 50% off promo through PU.
- The navigation on this network is the same as 18 Videos, I may have forgot to touch on the strengths and weaknesses of it. I will make sure to in this review.
Bottom Line:
Young Courtesans was a site that came along I want to say around 2012. When the porn world was set on Evil Angels and domination and abusive, violent porn. There was Young Courtesans with its, not really attempting to be heartcore but it came off as real sex and not some side freak show.
It's on this network and is updating several times per month. You get a lot really cute female models. It's the porn I remember from a decade ago except the new videos have up to 4K.
The reason I scored this network a little higher than the company's other network is they have more variation here. Especially in the newer niches. They have a very good stepfamily site called Kinky Family which I did a standalone review of. They have Massage X which is no longer updating but it is a very good massage site. Some of those are the best massage scenes I've seen. They have a Brutal X site that wants to push the boundaries with rough blowjobs and rough sex and I didn't really care for that one.
They blend in a couple of very rare niche sites like Make Him Cuckold. As much as we may think that type of site wouldn't be that popular. The site does keep up with downloads of the scenes. And the scenes on Make Him Cuckold have over 3,500 downloads, the majority of their scenes on their other sites have under 500 downloads. I really like seeing that from a network. They've brought in older (still 1080p) niches that I think were probably forced to stop producing new scenes of. And added newer niches that have become popular in recent years. I'm going to beat it to death saying if they combined this network with their other network, 18 Videoz it would be a near perfect network.
That will remind that I almost forgot the navigation part. The good with the navigation is you have a drop-down box that has all the sites you have access to, you click which site you want and you go right to it. You don't have to login again or any of that hassle. It also has a correct count on the number of scenes on each site. If you are on Young Courtesans it says there are 157 movies. Then you glance over and see the tab for "models" and it says 758. How do you do that? That's obviously the amount of models on the network not the site. That and their tags being tied to the whole network also hurts some of the navigation. It's not a major con.
I think the major con is having to join the two networks. I would even go as far as saying, having both networks on one for even $30 would be worth it. You would have everything right there on one page.
It's a good network as long as you're not expecting it to completely blow you away. This one only has 1,467 videos total and 758 models but most of this content is newer than on 18 Videoz.
That is probably why I feel like it should be combined. They have a good filming style, high quality and they have niches that you don't see that often. I would recommend it to anyone that thinks they may be interested in any of the sites on the network. I believe the other sites will eventually interest some too. It's better than most American networks that are going 100% cookie-cutter. And similar to their other network some of these scenes, especially ones with stories include on-screen English subtitles. Some of the models are speaking plain English. I feel like I made a good discovery of this network and the other and think both have value especially for collectors of those rare niches they cover.
I'm just curious why you're pointing out that porn sites, in a time when STDs are at the highest, are using condoms? I don't like them in porn but it doesn't seem like something that's that big of a deal. Even more so, did you ever think the sites aren't trying to hide the condoms but instead know the importance of them for the health of the models and are trying to make them less noticeable? I don't get the witch hunt you have going on here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the 35 bonus sites that comes with Zoliboy.com, from the best of my knowledge is 100% exclusive.
- Videos are 720 high end, pictures are available for every scene and come zipped as are screenshots, that also come zipped.
- Decent storylines in some of the videos
- Good DL speed, just above average for me
- Pretty good sized collection, for a bonus site, considering it looks to be all-exclusive, around 85 scenes, videos last around 20 minutes each and photos and screenshots from each.
Cons:
- Mostly interracial, if that's not your thing, probably won't like it.
- Wouldn't have enough content to stand on its own, but makes a nice bonus sites.
- Anytime you bring back older porn stars, you're risking seriously cheesy dialogue and in a good way I guess, some of these have that cheesy dialogue, like, "I see you brought your own tripod"!
Bottom Line:
I wanted to give this a full review for a few reasons. I liked the content. I found it funny, sexy and for the most part enjoyed it much more than I thought I would.
It didn't hurt that there are several models on here that I thought had retired and left the business. This is also why I think this content is exclusive.
One of my favorite stars of the late 90s was the beautiful Cindy Crawford, not the runway model, but the slim, blonde, few slight girly tattoos, almost innocent looking model. Cindy ended up being pretty damn kinky in her hardcore movies as her career progressed. Well, I haven't seen much new from her in several years, but they have a scene on here with her. She has cut her hair real short and it is a brunette/blonde mix. But her face is instantly recognizable. Like most of the other models on this site, she has aged, her butt doesn't look as firm as it did, but she is still pretty sexy.
Others that I knew but hadn't seen lately were Devon Lee, Fiona Cheeks, Joey Valentine, Valentina Lopez, the big booty of Ryen Ryder, you ready for this one? Nina Hartley! The first ever Hustler I looked at had a picture of Nina in it, in her prime, so I was surprised to see her still making hardcore scenes, that magazine had to be in the 80s.
The pictures and screenshots zipped is a nice touch.
If I was just joining this site, it wouldn't be reviewed, simply because there isn't enough content for the price, but when you get it free, it turns out to be a pretty good site. I've seen much worse as bonuses. The best scene to me was the Cindy Crawford scene as her a black guy play strip basketball. Maybe it is me, but I think Cindy was missing on purpose ha ha!
Most of the scenes have a little story like this that leads into the sex and it really has a good-natured feel to the site, lots of laughing and joking before the sex. I always like seeing the 90s models now and most of them have turned out pretty good. Most of these are American models too, which is a little different than what you expect from 21st Sextury.
Video quality at 720 high end is probably about as good as you could ask for from a bonus site. They do update weekly, nice preview if you want to see some of your old favorites and how they have matured over the years. I think the preview shows every scene they have. I know it shows a few pages.
Overall, if you were going to just join this site, I would say no, not for $30. But with 34 other sites included, it isn't bad and is worth taking a look at to see if any of your old favorites are still churning out new scenes. I say this because my knowledge of older models is mostly limited to the big stars like Devon and Cindy, some of you that are older than I am might know more or all of these models. The action is very good in the scenes too and what I recommend is if you join a 21st Sextury site, just find one that includes instant access to this one.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A Kink site, Divine Bitches is probably one of the more far-reaching sites for straight men.
- If you're looking for something different in today's copy and paste world of porn, you're going to find that something different here.
- Should be very high on anyone's list who likes seeing women in power sexually.
- Scenes are relatively long (50-70 minutes) and come in multiple formats for downloading, up to 720p.
- Navigation on just Divine Bitches is simple, but can get tiresome since it's a scroll through scenes site. Navigation across the network is very good though they've joined in the "channels" tab instead of "sites". That's a minor annoyance probably for just me.
- Download speeds are very good, I'm downloading at 90% of my max DL speed and it's consistent.
- Divine Bitches updates twice a month, which is at least acceptable.
- Comes with the Kink network which means you've got access to 29 other Kink-related sites.
- Excellent customer service (touch on in BL)
Cons:
- If you have trouble seeing a woman completely dominating a man then you're not going to like this site at all.
- Pictures are still missing. They are supposed to be returning, but it's a con until they do.
- This most likely is the perfect example of a "niche" site. Which means more people will dislike it before they even try it, thanks to stereotypes.
- I'll put it here with a note that I don't consider this a con, but some will. Highest video resolution is 720p. (Will further in BL)
Bottom Line:
Divine Bitches is a site I once received as a bonus site from Kink. My only interest in it at that time was the scenes with Isis Love in them. Even the scenes with Isis in them weren't as easy to watch as I expected. I should say I think Isis is the best of the models on this site.
What you have here is a big middle-finger to mainstream porn. You won't find a male performer squishing his foot on the face of the female. You won't have four 200 pound men having a gangbang with a 100 pound female. There's anal, but it's not what you're expecting by mainstream's standards. This is what really matters though. The males in these scenes seem to really enjoy the "abuse". Some most likely are gay or bisexual, but there's quite a few of them who have scenes with them dominating females on other sites. I don't mess around too much, in real-life, with dom/sub roleplay, but the models here, both male and female seem to really be into it.
Which is a big selling point of this site. You see genuine enjoyment, satisfaction from both the females and males. It even shows in their post-video interviews talking about the scene.
What you are going to see that you might not like or you might like a lot, is women using strap-ons on men. It's not in every scene, but it is common enough to mention it since some might be offended by it. I try to look at sex as a pure form of lust that is pushed by allowing yourself to do something you wouldn't ever think you would do. Because of this belief, it makes this site even more interesting and believable.
Wanted to mention something here. I've been a member of the Kink Network since they started it back several months ago. They don't use a regular biller like CCBill or Epoch, but do use an in-house biller. They're very easy to contact, respond quickly and should be looked at as an exception to the rule of not joining sites without a reputable biller. I've been a member here 12 different times and have nothing but good experiences with their customer service.
One of my cons is based around the picture sets. For years, Kink had picture sets with each scene, these were especially important to sites like Public Disgrace, where I wanted to see the expressions of the people watching. They're bringing them back, but I don't know when. The other con is they don't offer 1080p on their videos. But thanks to the length of most of their scenes, I'm not for sure if a person would really want to download a 1080p scene that last 70 minutes. The 720p scenes alone can be over 2-3 GB each. Luckily, their videos are crystal clear and I prefer 720p anyway.
This site shouldn't push anyone away. I originally thought it would me, but you see something here that you don't see as much in regular porn. You see the women coming off as powerful, dominant, like their bodies and sexual abilities are so great the man can't stop her. Where as when you see a dominant male, it's usually based around his physical traits being more powerful than the woman's. It shows a different side to sex, the mental side, which is very rare in porn. I can't say I enjoy the idea of seeing a woman stick a dildo up a hairy man butt, but Kink does a good job of focusing more on the woman's body as she's doing it.
If we all really thought about it, we would realize how many times we've complained about too many camera views of the man's butt when he's doing the female model in doggy. Well, on this site, that view is more of the female's butt. I used to join two Kink sites per year. I always considered them my "brain reset" sites that reset my brain from all the mainstream porn I watched. I have a year membership now that they're a network and really don't know if I'll ever cancel it. There's always something at least intriguing.
Still, I'm a realist and know some of the content on Divine Bitches, isn't for everyone. I do think if you have an open-mind and consider that it's still a naked woman and naked man, just like mainstream porn, you'll see that this site is very good. It's kind of like just changing the camera angle. And on top of it all, the female models on this site are almost all very attractive and sexy, even in feminine ways. Also, depending on how familiar you are with Kink, they are very diverse in their models. You'll find models of most races, most body-types from skinny to BBW and all the scenes are exclusive to Kink's network.
As of 2/20/2017 there are 387 scenes on Divine Bitches, top models (my favorites on here), include Ashley Fires, Isis Love, Lea Lexis, Daisy Ducati and Dragon Lily.
I consider this site one of my top 5 sites on the network and would recommend the network to anyone. There's enough "not so rough" and "not too far-reaching" porn here for the average porn fan, but especially recommend it for those who like to see some evolution in the porn world. Also consider the year membership to be the best value in porn.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Female domination of men. I don't know if it always includes the extra site, but when I joined it included Men in Pain.
- Unlike the last Kink site I reviewed (Public Disgrace), Divine Bitches and the added Men in Pain, combine for a very large collection. Large collection does have downfalls, will explain in BL.
- Divine Bitches has the full options on videos with HD being offered on close to 90% of all videos.
- I'm only putting pictures here because they do have them. The quality of them and how they are downloaded are cons.
- There seems to be varying degrees of femdom that this site showcases. Some of it is particularly interesting to me as someone with a past in psychology, other parts will turn a lot off, though I wasn't bothered by any of it. Will explain in BL.
- I like how Kink uses models who are mostly unknown or better yet, more exclusive to their sites, but as with anything it can be repetitive.
- Weekly update on Divine Bitches, no updates on Men in Pain.
Cons:
- I'll start with the main one. I knew going in that there was cuckold scenes. If you are offended by gay acts, you probably shouldn't join this site. I will further this in BL.
- The pictures are downloadable only in part zips. The quality of them is only 1280x720.
- This was talked about in my comment for this site in the replies, these men who the women are dominating, are mostly effeminate. It does take away most of the believability.
Bottom Line:
This was probably the most far-reaching porn experience for me. I have talked about my interest in the lighter side of cuckold. This is seen most in the DVDs like "Please Screw My Wife". With a long interest in the power/control aspects of sex, this genre at least interested me. I don't want this to turn into a lecture on psychological theory, but I'm on the side of humans who believes sex is most enjoyed when it's more lust than love. I also buy into the belief that there's a very thin line between love and hate, anger and joy and each of these represents a very strong emotion.
Men in Pain is a bonus site, but I'm guessing by looking at the update dates, Divine Bitches just became Men in Pain v.2. The Men in Pain site is mostly scenes with typical physical control games being played by the women. This site wouldn't interest me very much, but it is a nice bonus since you will see some more mainstream female models being very aggressive, which is rare for them. One that comes to mind is Jasmine Byrne. I always saw her as the pretty, little glamor model who went into submissive hardcore porn. Also can get some older scenes of Isis Love back when she was blonde and pre-implants. Outside of that though, Men in Pain, is of very little interest. I'm not exactly in position to fantasize about a small woman dominating me physically. I can see that now. Jasmine slapping me if she could reach my face, me saying, "aww that's cute". Sorry for the humor.
Divine Bitches is a whole other experience. This goes into mental and emotional pain. It has plenty of physical pain too, but it isn't limited to it. What you end up getting are scenes like this, woman tells her best female friend about her jerk husband. Female friend finds a big, tough guy and they go over to the woman's house. They force the husband to watch as his wife has sex with the other man.
Then they took it to a new level. Not only is the husband being forced to watch his wife have sex with another man, he's being forced to stick his face within inches of the penetration. His wife is saying things like compliments to the new man on his size and how her husband doesn't compare. We're getting deep here.
Then they took it to a new level. Not only is the man facing all the things in the above paragraph, but he's having to take the cumshot from the other man, giving the other man oral, in between pumps of his wife. This was a line to me.
It wasn't a line because it went too far. It became more obvious at that last level, the men being forced were bisexual or gay. I'm in no way trying to be an asshole about this, but the husband walks in the scene in a dress suit and tie. He has a masculine look. Then as soon as it comes time for him to do something labeled as "gay" he arches his back and becomes feminine. You lose me there.
This also applies to the scenes with just a male and female. Some of these men look to be lubing themselves up for a strap-on from their woman. Whether this goes into a gay act or not isn't the point. The point is it's about domination! The willing being dominated is not domination. Simple as that.
Overall, the site is good. The storylines are believable and even enjoyable in a distorted way. Like with other Kink sites, I do think you have to bring your imagination with you because of the fine line between what would be accepted and what would be going to far. For example, would having a real husband and wife in a scene, with the real straight male being forced to give a man a blowjob, be going into breaking laws? Keep the imagination handy and if you do, it's a good, very different site that might touch some emotions in you. And I'll give them a lot of credit for being risky and pushing boundaries, even if my imagination is still required.
The quality on the videos is pretty simple. Everything on Divine Bitches has up to HD except maybe 10 scenes. Each scene has smaller versions as well. With Men in Pain, you're going to be all over the place in quality. I downloaded one that was highest mp4 and it was 340x280. Did another and it was 720x480. Photo and navigation problems are the same as other Kink sites. No full photo zip download. Model list takes you to a network wide listing of each model and even if you have a membership to a site a scene is on, it tries to get you to sign up for the site or use pay on demand kinks, so it's useless. The best way to navigate the Kink sites is scroll, scroll, scroll.
These negatives are still fairly small and not enough to take away much from the site's overall grade. I do think for those who like to see women in dominant roles, it does the job. I could nitpick and say if the men were more masculine or even put up the least bit of resistance, but you do get the feeling the type of domination they are going for is the woman saying, "If you want me you will do what I say" and they do that well.
Another very good site from Kink that is recommended for those who are into this genre.
I like some scenes that show the woman in power and control. It could be just from years of watching Euro hardcore porn where the woman is rarely if ever in control or it could go into my own personal life where I've always just been too big physically for women to even fool with trying to be dominant with me. Where this site struggles in creating that is some of the women aren't that attractive to me, both in looks and attitude. I would like to see a site do this same niche, but have the woman seduce, then humiliate the man by making him do anything she says...to her. I had been most impressed with Reality King's CFNM Secret in creating the niche I am describing. A big part of these niches that focus on giving women the control, is my wife watching it since she has two things working against sexual control with me. She was raised in a country where all women are taught to be submissive and she loves the CFNM sites. If anything, I think Divine Bitches tries to break too much ground.
And I agree about Kink's sites having problems with being too polished, but I probably wouldn't be comfortable with the content if it was much harder and less planned or more abusive.
I was also thinking the same thing about the guys being bi. I made a similar complaint in my Sex Art review though a completely different genre. I think as these sites move into the future they are going to realize they're going to have to up the believability, as in, it doesn't convince me it's a big deal for a bi man to take another man's cumshot or in Sex Art's case, to have a sensitive, effeminate male act sensitive.
The Men In Pain site is a little more femdom and comes with this one. I also thought the women were more feminine on it and it did make those more believable. Especially Jasmine Byrne, she's such a dainty, tiny woman. It was pretty believable she could make a man take her punishment just to be with her.
I tried this site out for a month while a member on another Kink site. If you're looking for different than the norm, this is the place to start. You also get a bonus subscription to Men in Pain. Everything is the same as it is on other Kink sites. I didn't download all the scenes on Divine Bitches, but I do believe every scene has the HD option on videos. The pictures are separated into chapters which will always be an annoyance with Kink sites.
I know at least one member has mentioned Ashley Fires. She has quite a bit of content on here. Men in Pain has the very underrated Jasmine Byrne in ways most porn fans have never seen her. Really, the majority of this content is going to be different than nearly everything you've seen.
A bit of a warning ahead of time. There are what I would consider extreme cuckold scenes blended in. I'm still not real familiar with the depth of the cuckold genre, but I have always liked the sites that do what I guess is a lesser version of cuckold, where the husband watches his wife have sex. On this site, there are some of those, but there are also some where the husband is forced to give the wife's lover a blowjob and/or take the cumshot. So things could be going to an extreme there. These scenes are limited to the Divine Bitches site. Men in Pain is more along the lines of one on one femdom.
I can't say I would recommend it unless you're into the genre. For me, it was okay since I do like the dominant female scenarios. It goes well beyond the mainstream porn world though. Definitely one that you will want to look at the preview of before joining. A big positive for me was the models. Outside of a couple of Kink sites, you won't find a lot of well-known models, but Divine Bitches has quite a few. Lots of Isis Love on both sites for fans of Isis too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of Brazzers more creative sites in an underrepresented niche.
- This site has 596 scenes of Doctor Adventures. Each scene comes with a video and downloadable photos.
- Has good production values for a network site.
- The network as a whole has easy navigation as long as you are focused on one site at a time.
- Signed up on Rabbit's Birthday special for $9.95 and will easily get my money's worth.
- The scenes on this site do a good job of recreating an almost believable hospital scenario and setting.
- Decent acting and when it's not decent acting, it's usually really funny.
- Abella Danger as your doctor. That's worth something.
Cons:
- It's Brazzers, They try to get you with upsells right from the start but with a little discipline you can easily get to the main hub and avoid the upsells. There are parts they have listed at the top in channels but I don't even look at those. It's Brazzers, fake boobs and tattoos are common.
- Some of the ads at the bottom page, usually Reality Kings, look like better scenes than Brazzers has.
- As others have reported, older scenes, looks to be 2008 and back are gone. They are still listed but you can't stream or download them.
Bottom Line:
I once gave Brazzers a 72 for pissing me off with their stupid cancellation process. They still have their moments of trying to get you to join other sites but I'm not kidding, if you sign in and go to the hub, select "sites" and go through the sites, you won't have a single problem. If you get curious and start messing around with the other tabs and offers you could get yourself signed up to other sites.
Doctor Adventures is self-explanatory. The site still updates, it's not on a consistent update schedule but looks like they've average 2-3 updates a month for the last few months and have nearly 600 scenes.
When this niche first started there weren't a lot of scenes with female "doctors" on the site but that has changed now. I mentioned in the pros, one of the newest scenes is of Abella Danger as the doctor. It's one of her best scenes I've seen. They could have more build-up than they do. The build-up lasts about 4 minutes before some kind of sex starts.
What I do like about the site is they vary the scenario. Sometimes it's a nurse coming into check on a patient and having sex with the doctor while the patient is laying there. Sometimes a doctor comes in with 2 or more "students" that end up watching the sex or even getting involved. They have male doctors, female doctors, and the scenes seem to be big budget. Those days of a room that looked like it was made of cardboard cutouts are gone. These look like real hospital rooms.
The quality is excellent unless you're looking for 4K. If you start with the content in 2009, they have at least 720p and by 2011 they have 1080p on all scenes. Everything before 2008 seems to be dead links. I don't know how much of a deduction that should be. I'm seeing more sites doing this. If it's not either 720p or 1080p they are removing them from their servers.
You of course get the whole Brazzers network with this site and that adds a lot of value. I'm not as harsh on Brazzers as some are. I don't know an exact number but I would say 80% of porn being made these days is cookie cutter. At least with Brazzers you're getting some of the best looking models and they do at least try to put some story to their scenes.
Since I am a picture fan, I'll mention that the photosets are a combination of photo shoot style sets and from the video. I like that better than just the screencaps versions. The Abella Danger scene has around 50 pictures of Abella posing before the scene starts. It then has around 100 photos of the scene.
I think they are onto something with the "students" scenes with 2-3 female students observing the doctor and patient having sex. It's very reminiscent of Reality KingsCFNM Secret.
An overall warning is about the missing scenes. Those are not just missing from this site. There are scenes missing from all of the sites and they are the older scenes. I had a Lana Lopez, Ella Milano lesbian scene from their site "Hot and Mean" from years ago, it's no longer on here. The comments on Lana's page on Brazzers are even asking where that scene is. I've told in the past that Asses in Public, one of the best exhibitionist/flashing sites ever is down to 14 scenes. It used to have over 50 and I'm pretty sure it was near 100 at one time.
Their newer scenes are still better than a lot of the newer scenes other mainstream porn sites are putting out, especially the ones on Doctor Adventures. This is not a gynecological site. It's usually, doctor tells patient to get naked, touches happen and someone yells "action".
It's worth looking through to see if they cover any fetishes you might have with medical situations and looking for models like Abella Danger. Good but not great site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the oldest interracial networks online.
- Introduced me to Gloryhole porn many years ago.
- Has over 20 included sites.
- Over 1,600 models.
- Around 15 updates per month.
- Fast download speeds (85% of my max
- Epoch is the biller and promos go for as cheap as $15 per month.
Cons:
- They’re a victim of their own success. Many niches they have started have now become common across the internet and it’s easy to forget where it all started.
- All niches become repetitive and that goes for the majority of this network.
Bottom Line:
Dogfart was one of those networks that everyone into porn knew about. It was near impossible to view a porn TGP site without seeing dozens of clips from Blacks on Blondes. That was and still is the closest they have to a flagship site. Gloryhole.com is included and was the first time I ever saw gloryhole porn … in porn. They tried to make Gloryhole more exciting and new/fresh with their site Gloryhole Initiations.
There’s bad news in that if you never really liked this network you still won’t but that brings the good news of if you ever liked it, you likely still will. You just aren’t going to see anything new or that different between the newest updates and updates from 10 years ago. It’s the classic formula of don’t fix what isn’t broken. With that said, I only need to join the network once every few years. There’s just not a lot in the newer content for someone who has seen it before.
The good news continues with the 1080p downloadable videos though you will have to pay extra if you want 4K. There are also pictures available for download in zips. The navigation is as good as it can be. They also are still updating on average of a new scene every other day. This is one of those networks that price has to play a factor in the score. The promos are usually for $14.95 per month and considering you get new updates plus the thousands of old scenes, the price and value could be the biggest pro. That is if you like interracial porn.
The sites that have offer some variety. There is a cuckold site, a handjob site, gloryhole/blowjob site, a lesbian site, multiple hardcore sites and they even add a couple of gay sites for good balance.
The biggest problem comes with the execution. Sites like Gloryhole have no room to progress or grow. Blacks on Blondes really doesn’t either, I’m not even for sure how these sites could be progressed and that’s our biggest problem here. If you like for things to stay the same, you will appreciate the consistency of the scenes. If you like for something more, progressive, some change, you’re not going to get much of that. The majority of the content was established in shooting style over a decade ago and they do the style well. If you need some change or variety, you should only join for 1 month at a time.
I do believe it is still the best interracial site or network. It should be approached that way and with plenty of time. It is an overwhelming network considering how large it is. It’s still good for newcomers as the site is very easy to use and there’s enough good porn to keep you happy and satisfied for a while.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- For my money, the best interracial network on the internet.
- I'm counting 23 sites, including some of the groundbreaking sites in the genre.
- Gloryhole and Gloryhole Initiations are enough to me. Those two sites alone have nearly 1,000 Gloryhole scenes on them.
- 5,650 total scenes according to their member's area homepage, 1,270 models, 900,000+ pictures.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max).
- Good enough navigation for a network this size. The hub page is quite useful and you don't have to sign into each site.
- The only thing limited is they charge extra for 4K.
- Some of the sites are sleepers to me and I mean that in a good way. You could easily look over Zebra Girls which is a very good interracial lesbian site.
- Two gay sites as well, they're covering most of the bases.
- Epoch is the biller
Cons:
- Once you go to each site it becomes a scroll fest. I think I once commented that I broke my scroll wheel on this network.
- They have some but I would like to see more black girls with white guys. Surely if you can make a great network last 20+ years with the name Dogfart you can find some more black girls.
- Some recycling going on
Bottom Line:
Dogfart has been around so long that the first time I ever watched a porn scene online it was by them and it took all night to download it on a dial-up connection. I'm throwing a little humor in here, some of their youngest models were not even born when Dogfart started. That's impressive.
I'm going to list the sites you receive and total amount of scenes each site has. I always felt like Dogfart was a broad network. There's some content on here I never look at and there's some I always join for so seeing the number counts will help with others like me so they can see how much content has been added to their favorite site(s).
I'll be blunt, I don't like the solo sites they have and really would be okay with just having Gloryhole, Gloryhole Initiations, Watching Mom/Daughter Go Black, Zebra Girls, We Fuck Black Girls and Black on Blondes.
Which I think shows what I mean when I say it's a broad network.
It's very hard to say how often they are updating since all their sites have their most recent scenes listed as 2020. They are definitely recycling on some of these sites. There's a comment on one that says 2020 release date and the comment was in 2013. I'm not going to take off for it since it's on the sites I don't like.
Gloryhole porn was one of the first fetishes I realized I had. That goes into that suspension of belief and you wonder what your girlfriend or wife would do if she was in a bathroom and a dick popped through a hole in the wall. It was an early one for me so I was probably just in my early 20s.
Their style of interracial porn is better than other interracial sites, for me. Dogfart takes care of my interests in interracial porn.
If you're into 4K, you're not going to be happy. They currently have a spring break special of upgrading each scene to 4K for $3.99 PER scene. I don't watch 4K. Not a big deal to me. They have good camerawork, I would call it professional, their 1080p and 720p videos are very clear on my 1080p television.
The amount of content will keep you busy for a long time and I continue to believe we should elevate these networks that are not charging us extra for HD downloads.
I think I've said this before. These are not the prettiest female models, not in an overall view, they have some pretty models here but some of them are average at best.
I think Gloyhole stands out there since they seem to get better looking models on it and of course the Gloryhole scenes have evolved. They're now having sex through the Gloryhole, not just blowjobs. You can tell they've tried adding small parts like the woman masturbating a little before the dick pops through the hole in the wall.
I haven't run into any download limits and the site works well. To the other side of it, the older scenes really need to be remastered.
It's a lot of content and it's a site I join once a year to catch up on my favorite sites listed above.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I'm going to guess that this network is the biggest interracial network on the internet.
- It's also has some of the longest-running interracial websites included with it, including Blacks and Blondes, which has been around for roughly 15 years.
- Has what I consider to be the best Gloryhole site.
- Download speeds are very good. Right around 90% of max.
- Quite a few sites are included in the network that I'm pretty sure used to be standalone sites, so it's kind of rare content.
- Good mixture of female models. Most are above-average in looks and play their roles well.
- Very good quality, 720p from 2009 to 1080p starting in early 2012. Most scenes have downloadable zipped photo sets as well.
- Navigation is very good for a network.
- Epoch as the biller.
- Quite a bit of reverse interracial (stereotypical), with black girls being with white guys.
- Large amount of content, will detail in BL.
Cons:
- I've always said the name of this network hurts it more than anything. Can you imagine the look on my wife's face when I said, "I joined Dog Fart Network"?
- Stereotypes are in abundance here. If you're a politically-correct person, socially-touchy person, you're probably going to have a problem with some of the content. I personally find most of the content to be humorous and playful.
- Probably the only real complaint is that the network could be organized a little better.
- There's a download limit, but I haven't hit it yet. I've went as high as 12.5GB in a day without hitting it so I'm not really for sure if it's a con or not.
Bottom Line:
This was only my second time as a member. The last time was 10 years ago and it was only to Gloryhole, which was a standalone site if I remember right. I've always been fascinated by the Gloryhole concept. We live near a university that was supposedly one of the first reported universities to have Gloryholes in their bathrooms.
Nowadays you get Gloryhole.com and quite a few more sites. I'm going to mention this since I recognize some of these sites included in the network as what used to be solo model sites. Models like Spring Thomas, I always thought she was a solo model and her site has been around since 2003, either way, there's 6-7 of those type of sites that look like they were once solo sites. So if you're a fan of any of those models you're in luck with this network.
Now, here's my big reason for liking this network. The Gloryhole content is just more believable here than any other I've seen. And on top of that, your membership also includes Gloryhole Initiations. Those two sites are enough for me to join and be happy with my membership. The two combined have around 900 Gloryhole scenes.
But there's other sites here worth checking out. As mentioned earlier in the pros, Blacks on Blondes is one of the oldest interracial sites on the internet. I remember seeing their content and the Dogfart logo on TGP sites back in the early 2000s. Admittedly, I haven't and won't download much from Blacks and Blondes since it's very common, mainstream porn, but there's over 700 scenes just on that site alone.
I do like We Fuck Black Girls, which goes into the role-reversal of typical interracial porn. You just don't see a lot of black girls in porn these days, but they have 50 scenes on this still actively updating site. The newest update with Jenna Foxx is one of my favorite scenes.
There's really plenty to like here. While not all sites are updating and some are just updating once per month, they still are pushing out updates on average of every other day. I will say I took a couple points off because there's 4-5 sites that are on the border of looking like they're going to stop updating (no updates in 30+ days).
I'll also say their navigation is very good. You have a main network hub that shows all the sites and how much content each site has. Once you click on a site, over in the upper-left corner is the name of the site. You can click that and go to any other site in the network from there. The scenes come up in order of newest to oldest, 5 per page and over on the right side is a jump to page link, which allows you to jump back to any page you want without having to push back buttons or "more" buttons. It's very good and other networks could learn from it.
Here's a list of the sites you get with a membership, how many scenes they have and I'll list if they're still updating:
Blacks on Blondes 765 scenes, still active. Cuckold Sessions 173 scenes, still active. Gloryhole.com 565 scenes, still active.
Blacks on Cougars 87 scenes, no updates since July 2016. We Fuck Black Girls 49 scenes, still active. Watching My Mom Go Black 84 scenes, still active.
Interracial Blowbang 87 scenes, still active. Cum Bang 81 scenes, still active. Interracial Pickups 75 scenes, still active. Watching My Daughter Go Black 53 scenes, no updates since June 2106. Zebra Girls 54 scenes, still active.
Gloryhole Initiations 313 scenes, still active.
Black Meat, White Feet 40 scenes, no updates since June 2016.
Several of those above sites are on the border of being inactive. I counted 5 of those that haven't updated since late August, which puts them right at a month without an update, but maybe they'll come through with those. They seem to update in bunches.
These are the sites that look like they're updating, but I think they're just recycling old content. Main reason for thinking this is the video quality is 720p at best and the clothing, televisions, looks upwards of 10 years old. Spring Thomas, Katie Thomas, Ruth Blackwell, Candy Monroe, Barb Cummings, The Minion and Wife Writing. These sites have a combined 750ish scenes in addition to the sites listed above. There's also two gay sites included, Blacks on Boys and Gloryholes and Handjobs. There's right at 400 scenes on those two sites combined.
It's definitely a network worth looking at for a month or two, especially if you're into the Gloryhole scenes or Interracial porn.
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse, but no model, in my opinion, did the tease as well as Eve Angel in her older sets. She's lost most of it now in her newer content, but her content from say 2004-2008, the striptease would last for, on average, half of a video. And you could tell she thoroughly enjoyed it. Having seen some of her newer content, the tease has been cut in about half. I don't know if that's the new producer's fault or if Eve is just getting tired of the business.
A lot of times, you will notice that the members who like photos more than videos are older. I'm not quite into the older group, but am old enough to say the first 5-6 years I saw porn, it was in magazines, Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler. Photos also seem to be favored by those that like using their imagination. I seem to go back and forth. I'll have months where I just join DVD sites, no photos at all, then I will jump to a site that has photos and videos, then find myself on the more artistic very softcore sites. Which most have videos, but they are usually extremely boring. I may be trying to find some kind of balance too. My wife "almost" hates hardcore, she loves softcore, so I find myself trying to balance them out, but I do think the nostalgic, remembering old magazines and the photos, does play a big role in these photo only sites surviving.
No need to ignore it. I have always had slight problems enjoying any of the non-explicit sites, I mean, it could be just one explicit picture out of 60 and I would be happier with the site as a whole. My use of artsy, I noticed that the main guy behind this site allows members to send a few pictures to friends and I also found an entire site where aspiring photographers talk about these pictures and aspiring artists, charcoal, watercolors, reproduce the photos in charcoal and paintings. That's a little more complex than I like my porn. In my porn brain, there are two types of porn sites, sexual and artistic and I'm not expanding that view lol!
Goddess Nudes does have some clothed pictures, but I wouldn't call them stripteases. You know the kind, there will be five completely clothed pictures then in the 6th picture the model is completely nude. Not much in-between clothed and nude. I'm like you, I like the progression, anticipation and tease then the nudity. I do at least like that they have some clothed since that at least let me know what the model looks like clothed. The other thing Goddess Nudes adds is that some of the pictures show more pink, more provocative poses. On Domai, the provocative poses are often planned out not to show everything. Like one model, believe it is Victoria, has a great body, curves and there is a picture of her in doggystyle, but the photo is taken looking at her face so you don't get to see the other side of the pose. Another of this Zulfija, she's in rushing water, two photos in this pose, legs spread open and the water is rushing right between her legs blocking any explicit view. I guess that could be considered a tease in a way, but teases that don't ever let me see what was being teased frustrate me!
But it is hard to beat that Goddess Nudes price at $4.95 a month. I'm not going to post a review on it since Drooler's review covers most of it, but I am going to post a comment with updated content numbers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that is only about nude photos, no videos here and most of the photos are non-sexual poses. The selling point for me to join was that I liked several of the models and the price is right at $9.95 per month.
- Really nice pictures, I like the lighting, they also come zipped.
- I personally didn't have any problems with navigation and thought it was very easy to use. It's one of those sites where you start at A on the model index, click A, scan through those models, go to B, and so on.
- If you are interested in photography, I would say this site would be a nice place to start. It's very artsy.
Cons:
- Well, if you're coming here to find anything that doesn't require some imagination to enjoy from a sexual standpoint, you're out of luck.
- This is actually a con based on the sister site Goddess Nudes, the photos could be bigger, most of what I have downloaded top out at 1999 long end. I've not scanned through all of them, but the majority have been around the 2000 long end range.
- There's not much tease or strip here. The model I was most interested in, Zulfija, doesn't have a clothed picture on the site!
- I personally think Goddess Nudes, ran by the same company, is a better site if you at least want some sexuality in the photos and the photos are bigger, plus it's only $4.95 a month.
Bottom Line:
I don't think I can write much more about this site than the pros/cons cover.
This site has been around a long time. The content to me is softer than what I consider softcore. This can be a problem since most of the models start out a set already nude, but never really show anything more than they do in the 1st picture of the set. I do respect that this is the style of site Domai is, but I just can't get that excited over looking at sexy, naked women staring off into space.
There are bright spots here though. The quality of the photos are very good, lots of natural lighting in the outdoor shots, good price, daily updates and if you like using your imagination, this site will really let you do that.
It has been said before so I won't go into it too deeply. There are no videos.
One other thing that is probably just me being used to larger photo sets, the photo sets I have downloaded seem to average between 40-60 photos.
On the positive side because I am going to recommend this site to those looking for softer content, artistic content. The choice of models is very good. I will add that there are some sets that have photos topping out at 3000 long end. If there are others that are bigger, I haven't found them.
There is a package deal to join both Domai and the sister site Goddess Nudes, but the offer I received was for $44.95 for both for 3 months. I just joined Domai for $9.95/mo. then joined Goddess Nudes for $4.95/mo. which equals out to the same price as the multi-month option.
I really can't suggest anything to change except the size of the photos. I'm sure they have established a fanbase that loves this style of nude photos and respect that. As I said in the cons, I would recommend Goddess Nudes over it in a head to head comparison just because the photos are a little more sexual and have higher resolutions. Makes a nice pairing of sites for $15 too.
So, if you're not wanting videos, not wanting anything real sexual and are just looking for some nice quality nude photography, I would recommend it based on the low price. If you're looking for anything more than very soft softcore, I wouldn't recommend it.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
