Review Replies (8)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Capn (0)
|
A very helpful review, Exotics.
Thank you.
I thought it was missing out on the striptease.
I think that is a great shame, as nude at start takes away progression, anticipation & tease.
Is the situation any better at Goddess Nudes?
Cap'n. :0/
|
08-27-11 11:35pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
I'm in a nit-picky mood, so feel free to ignore this.
But I don't think this is an artsy site. I think it's more like a simple, natural site, very low-key photos. A lot of lovely models, and models that are less lovely but still nice. A lot of simple photos of women that can be lovely or pretty or just nice-looking. Not artsy or glamour-style photography, more like a "natural" style photography.
|
08-28-11 09:55am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
exotics4me (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Capn :
Hey Cap'n,
Goddess Nudes does have some clothed pictures, but I wouldn't call them stripteases. You know the kind, there will be five completely clothed pictures then in the 6th picture the model is completely nude. Not much in-between clothed and nude. I'm like you, I like the progression, anticipation and tease then the nudity. I do at least like that they have some clothed since that at least let me know what the model looks like clothed. The other thing Goddess Nudes adds is that some of the pictures show more pink, more provocative poses. On Domai, the provocative poses are often planned out not to show everything. Like one model, believe it is Victoria, has a great body, curves and there is a picture of her in doggystyle, but the photo is taken looking at her face so you don't get to see the other side of the pose. Another of this Zulfija, she's in rushing water, two photos in this pose, legs spread open and the water is rushing right between her legs blocking any explicit view. I guess that could be considered a tease in a way, but teases that don't ever let me see what was being teased frustrate me!
But it is hard to beat that Goddess Nudes price at $4.95 a month. I'm not going to post a review on it since Drooler's review covers most of it, but I am going to post a comment with updated content numbers.
|
08-28-11 12:41pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
exotics4me (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :
Hey lk2fireone,
No need to ignore it. I have always had slight problems enjoying any of the non-explicit sites, I mean, it could be just one explicit picture out of 60 and I would be happier with the site as a whole. My use of artsy, I noticed that the main guy behind this site allows members to send a few pictures to friends and I also found an entire site where aspiring photographers talk about these pictures and aspiring artists, charcoal, watercolors, reproduce the photos in charcoal and paintings. That's a little more complex than I like my porn. In my porn brain, there are two types of porn sites, sexual and artistic and I'm not expanding that view lol!
|
08-28-11 12:49pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Capn (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - exotics4me :
Yes, I am sure a lot of us do appreciate the near lost art of the striptease. I just wish more websites dealt with the subject properly.
Fully clothed shots to set up anticipation.
Slow strip & tease to full coy & more explicit nudity.
It really isn't that difficult!
Cap'n. :0/
|
08-28-11 01:51pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
gaypornolover (0)
|
I don't think I'll ever understand the appeal of photo-only sites, but I can see it's more popular than I expected on this forum and I guess compared to magazines, these sites are good value.
Good review - there seem to be very few equivalent gay sites but I can see how after hardcore video a site like this might be kind of refreshing. I think if a site told me a lot about the person, it might do more for me.
|
08-28-11 07:21pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
exotics4me (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - gaypornolover :
A lot of times, you will notice that the members who like photos more than videos are older. I'm not quite into the older group, but am old enough to say the first 5-6 years I saw porn, it was in magazines, Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler. Photos also seem to be favored by those that like using their imagination. I seem to go back and forth. I'll have months where I just join DVD sites, no photos at all, then I will jump to a site that has photos and videos, then find myself on the more artistic very softcore sites. Which most have videos, but they are usually extremely boring. I may be trying to find some kind of balance too. My wife "almost" hates hardcore, she loves softcore, so I find myself trying to balance them out, but I do think the nostalgic, remembering old magazines and the photos, does play a big role in these photo only sites surviving.
|
09-12-11 10:59pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
exotics4me (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Capn :
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse, but no model, in my opinion, did the tease as well as Eve Angel in her older sets. She's lost most of it now in her newer content, but her content from say 2004-2008, the striptease would last for, on average, half of a video. And you could tell she thoroughly enjoyed it. Having seen some of her newer content, the tease has been cut in about half. I don't know if that's the new producer's fault or if Eve is just getting tired of the business.
|
09-12-11 11:23pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
