| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
While there is a ton of strap-on sex - seriously, seriously rough strap-on sex - anal sex is a less common. Only a few of the models do it - largely I think because since strap-ons haven't any nerve-endings the model controlling it doesn't exactly know how rough she is being. That said, it isn't too uncommon. Anytime Amber Rayne loses you can expect to see copious anal sex - as she is a big fan of it. In fact, tag-team matches with her often see her getting DPed. It kind of pains me to know that she keeps becoming a better wrestler, as we see less and less of her on the receiving end.
None-the-less, this is still some of the most aggressive strap-on action I've seen - complete with gagging and all. And the wrestling matches themselves are quite engaging. Some point in the future I'll be rejoining to check out their new super-sized wrestling mat and how that changes the competition.
|
04-06-08 10:41am
|
Reply
377
|
Tussinee
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
Good review - I couldn't agree more. The question is.. are any of us going to ever pony up the cash for Tussinee Gold? That's a whole lotta dough for one month...
|
04-06-08 08:55am
|
Reply
378
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I didn't know about the British variant - that I'll bookmark that. Indeed, after looking up the WHOIS on both the sites, Phil Knight owns both sites - so they are sibling sites.
IAFD is quite the grand daddy of pornstar indexes, but they simply miss some of the small names in the more obscure markets. Certainly can't beat them for user friendliness though. I even have a search widget in Firefox that lets me quickly look up video or star using their engine.
|
04-05-08 06:54pm
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
heff's Poll
Not really much of an issue - I've actually willingly deleted my porn collection because I needed a hard drive in the past. My current collection is probably iteration number 10 or something near there. One way or another my porn collection rarely lasts more than 2 years. A couple of months ago a drive failure toasted about 250GB, I've already got 200GB of porn to replace it.
I don't think I'd ever keep multi-terabytes of porn - I'd never remember to look at it. Honestly, if I had boat loads of money, I'd just subscribe all the time to all of the sites I even remotely like and then invest is a beefy ISP so I can download whatever catches my fancy at that moment. Plus I often get a bit bored by older content. My collection exists simply because I'm not rich enough to not have one.
|
04-05-08 11:48am
|
Reply
380
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Indeed they certainly do, two other good model tracking sites are:
www.egafd.com (European Girls Adult Film Database)
Great for a really, really hard to find girls and deals with pseudonyms.
www.sportyone.com (SportyONE)
Much more user friendly than EGAFD, but not as many models listed.
Between the three index sites - you should certainly be able to find your model.
It's like Where's Waldo, but for porn!
|
04-05-08 11:39am
|
Reply
381
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the info! That's pretty good res for those newer videos, and WMV is fast becoming the standard for all porn sites, so no bad there. Yeah, the price is a bit high, but I gotta say I haven't seen any of these girls anywhere else, so it looks likes it worth it. I'll have to join up in a bit. Cheers!
|
04-04-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
382
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Roughly how many videos are we getting with this site? If you can break it down by each site in the network, that would be awesome.
And are the newer videos still 640x480 or are they higher res now?
Also - do they do any matching photo sets or is it all video?
Thanks!
|
04-03-08 09:43pm
|
Reply
383
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well I've had a few sites in the section, and now I just popped a few users in to see what happens... I really don't quite see the value of the section that much. All it does is list sites I like, which I know I like because well, I like them. It also lists users whose reviews I like - but it doesn't list their reviews.
Certainly I could click on each one and see if they've posted anything new, but I think it would be much more useful if it listed say the latest 10 reviews from the combined group. Not 10 from each, more like if you made a list of all the reviews by those users, sorted them by date, and then showed the first 10. Then it would give me the option of going back farther and farther in the list. That would be quite useful. As it is now, meh - I doubt I'll use it much.
|
04-03-08 09:39am
|
Comment
384
|
Argentina Triple X
(0)
|
|
04-01-08 07:41am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
385
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
This is definitely one of those situation specific things - if they, the content producers, are aiming for the cute school girl look with the pig tails and the works, nothing seals the deal better than a cute spinner in braces. Much like other body modifications like tattoos or piercings, it can make already hot girls that much hotter. Generally I would prefer girls not to have braces, but since it is rather, it is often a treat when you seen a beautiful model with them.
And yes, as Drooler pointed out, I too will assuming that the poll is referring to dental braces. Forest Gump is just not hot.
|
04-01-08 07:33am
|
Reply
386
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
How about if I answered "She's imaginary and/or lives in Canada"?
|
03-31-08 07:55pm
|
Reply
387
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
While on a purely academic level I'm certain this is an interesting query: However I fail to understand what this has to do with porn. Be it viewing it, acquiring it, storing it or what have you. Perhaps if you are making it...
I suppose it might apply to Tantric Sex - but usually that doesn't make for interesting porn - it is really designed more for the participants.
|
03-30-08 04:30pm
|
Comment
388
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
|
03-27-08 08:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
389
|
Asia Movie Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
I just joined a few days ago - but I haven't really noticed that yet. I'm exploring the content still but there seems to be plenty of Bukkake for new users. I gotta say though, I tend to like a little variety or I'll get bored, so if they are mixing it up a little while still holding on to the bukkake trend a bit, I'll be happy. I could understand it upsetting purists though.
|
03-26-08 03:52pm
|
Reply
390
|
Anal Daughters
(0)
|
Reply of
killspears's Review
If you can list a con, it can't be a 100 - come on now. A little realism in the score would be nice.
How about telling us the number of models, videos and photo sets. Are the videos DRM protected? What are the dimensions of the vids and photos? Is the site easy to navigate, are all the models hot, or just some? Is it solo content, or g/g or b/g?
I understand that not everyone spends hours on their reviews, but a little effort would be appreciated.
|
03-26-08 03:47pm
|
Reply
391
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
While I honestly didn't expect anyone to basically say what you did, you bring up an important strength of Porn Users as a resource on a whole. There are so many reviewers, with so many tastes and interests, that there are reviews, even if they are real quick ones, for lots of very tiny niche sites. Sites that aren't worth the time of the big review sites yet, but here someone pops in and gives you a glimpse at what you are getting - and that can really save you from wasting 30 bucks.
Basically, the point is, that while some reviewers take quite awhile preparing the review (my average review writing time is 1.5 hours, not counting the "research" time spent prior on the site) and others just write up a quick opinion style overview - any review is better than no reviews, even if it is as simple as: "Rubbish, only 10 videos."
|
03-26-08 08:47am
|
Reply
392
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Bloody hell, why would I post them if I was just going for average - or ::gasp:: below? I therefore foresee this poll being horribly skewed toward the top bit.
Certainly each review is a learning process and I think one improves a little each time, measurable or not - still, it's just not real likely that we are going to judge our selves in an outwardly negative light - well, do so and be public about it. I guess maybe some of those blokes that never post a reply might, but even then - do people really, knowingly post rubbish reviews?
|
03-26-08 12:38am
|
Reply
393
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I would just for the amusing idea of having a supply of porn on my person at all times, however I have been unsuccessful in my attempts to import any video, let alone porn. BitPim has been great for ringtones, but it crashes everytime it try to upload video. (Got an LG Chocolate VX8550.) Oh well, maybe in the future.
|
03-24-08 10:08am
|
Reply
394
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
Excellent - thanks for the update! The Flash streaming is wonderful, I first ran across that recently with All Internal and loved it, a great double check before downloading a video.
|
03-22-08 12:48am
|
Reply
395
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I have never really hid my interest in porn or my participation in this site. In fact I quite enjoyed telling people last x-mas: "Porn paid for Christmas this year!" Then of course I had to explain a bit, but it still amused me. None-the-less, I'm picky about t-shirts and so the design definitely would have to be quite nifty if I were to wear it about. A real good example of simple, site specific t-shirt designs are the ones made for Newgrounds. You can check out their shirts here:
http://www.newgrounds.com/store/
I'd probably wear any of those shirts excluding the basic logo shirts.
Maybe if the front of the shirt was the giant phallic pencil and then on the back simply had the text: "Porn reviews by the people." That would be pretty cool and would definitely start some interesting conversations. Beyond that, cool graphical designs that simply had some connection to the site or perhaps so sort of sponsorship parody shirt with a billion different porn sites and their logos - that might be good for a laugh.
Anyway, I'm open to the idea for sure, but most of the shirts would have to be pretty PG and leave a good bit of mystery to make it fun to explain.
|
03-22-08 12:39am
|
Reply
396
|
Fucked Up Facials
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Review
Hmmm, it looks like they took Freaks Of Cock and realized that the fake penises should be used only for the facial. Looks like its worth checking out.
|
03-21-08 10:05am
|
Reply
397
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
Simply put: No.
However, for those who are curious, and as I am a current member (and will be adding an updated review sometime in the future), here are the full system specs:
Operating System:
Microsoft™ Windows 98 SE / ME / NT4 (Service Pack 3 or higher) / 2000 / XP / Vista
Minimum Requirements:
* Intel™ Pentium 4 or compatible (AMD, ...)
* Clock rate 1 Ghz or better
* 64 MB 3D Graphics accelerator, resolution 800*600 or higher
* OpenGL 1.1 (or higher; 1.5 recommended) or DirectX 8.1 (or higher; 9.0c recommended)
* 512MB RAM or more
* Active internet connection when playing
As a side note - be a bit careful, when I was popping on to their site to check the specs just now, I got hit by a Trojan. It seems their server has come down with a bit of cold. As always when explorer the unbridled frontier of the internet, make sure your virus scanner is up-to-date.
|
03-20-08 02:14am
|
Reply
398
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
For me this is a null question as any person with at least moderate common-sense will know not to browse porn sites at work with the volume knob at 10. Frankly you never know when you'll stumble across a pop-up with groaning farm animals and midgets slapping large women with marinated hams (for example). So if the videos autoplay - that really isn't a problem, unless your computer is rubbish and slows everything down, but then who's fault is that?
What I would say though - is I rather love Flash based video previews, they are fast, easy for the computer to handle (even running multiple videos simultaneously) and most of them offer full screen these days as well. I must say that Flash has really come into its own in the past few years and frankly has become quite a dominate force in streaming video. It has even trumped the mighty Windows Media Player - it loads faster, it can look just as good (assuming you are watching videos that don't require your own personal T3 line) and it will even let you skip to whatever part of the video you are interested in and begin buffering there - it's brilliant!
|
03-20-08 12:36am
|
Reply
399
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Ah, that final sentence is one to live by!
That batch downloading feature is certainly a powerful tool - but it brings up an important question about really any content site: Do you really want it all?
What we really need is an A.I. Porn Butler that you can teach your preferences and then quietly finds only the porn you want and presents it to you after you've settled into the study, wearing your smoking jacket and just finished a cigar.
|
03-18-08 10:37pm
|
Reply
400
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
It seems today's progressive porn surfer really does need quite the arsenal of download managers at their finger tips. I must say I'll have to keep IDM in mind for the next time I run into trouble with dTa, which undoubtedly will happen as the internet seems to loathe consistency and complying to standards. I mean Firefox and Internet Explorer can't even agree on how much of CSS 2 they want to support. They even require different commands for some of the same functions - it is bloody ridiculous.
None-the-less, there is a larger field of download managers than ever. So with the wealth of options out there the top tip is to simply keep trying them until you find one that works for whatever problem-child site your trying to wrangle in this week.
|
03-18-08 09:28pm
|
