| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
hehe, that search engine is a beast! I love it - now if they can just make the filters able to switch to excluding categories too... Maybe in the future, their site talks about how they custom built engine :-)
|
11-29-08 11:15pm
|
Reply
202
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
RipRap's Reply
No worries - the DRM was a serious detractor on GGG, it is about bloody time they removed it. I was just making a little bit of stink because they recently were removing it (and finally finished) and since porn users sorts the reviews by when the review was written, not when the reviewer was a member... well you get the point - so many thanks for updating the review, much appreciated and many props for not getting pissed at me for complaining - other people might have told me to blow it out my ass, lol
And my review is very much outdated at this point... I need to rejoin and re-review it! :-D
|
11-29-08 11:13pm
|
Reply
203
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
RipRap's Reply
Yes - DRM is definitely a major flaw for a site and agreed, shame on them - but much love to them for finally seeing the light! I just didn't want users to be scared away from a site that has so bizarre but quite interesting porn. Thanks for updating the review :-)
|
11-29-08 11:03pm
|
Reply
204
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
RipRap's Reply
I completely agree with your distaste for DRM, it is a huge pain in the ass and users need to be warned of it when it is being used. My point of posting the comment was two part - first part being that I really like German Goo Girls and don't want users to run away because the latest review (your at the time of posting the comment) basically screamed "DRM, run away! run away!" (prior to being updated), and secondly, just to draw attention to the fact that this interesting site has finally gotten rid of its biggest flaw.
|
11-29-08 11:00pm
|
Comment
205
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
|
11-29-08 04:37pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
206
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
RipRap's Review
Sadly this is the problem with 6 month old reviews - GGG went DRM-free officially on November 27th, 2008.
I see that you note this in the pros, but the only thing taken away from a cursory glance a user would be that the site uses DRM, and that is simply not the case. It would be appreciated if the Cons were changed to "Used to use DRM" as that would be accurate.
|
11-29-08 04:33pm
|
Reply
207
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Interesting - I didn't realize some of these sites weren't native to this network. I do hope they increase the resolution, but it is still a nice network to be sure.
|
11-28-08 10:42pm
|
Reply
208
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Respectable, but not massive - thanks for the info! :-)
|
11-27-08 10:48pm
|
Reply
209
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
That is what is so boggling - if their site looked like a throw-back to the 90's, I'd expect the ads. Other than the ads, the site is quite polished, easy to use and contemporary and rather attractive. I have to give them credit that they've obviously designed the site with the ads in mind - they are jutting out and screwing up the page design.
|
11-26-08 09:38am
|
Reply
210
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
Wow! That is a seriously positive review, I'll have to check this site out :-) What size are the high res photos? I'm probably about as interested in the photos as I am the video.
|
11-26-08 09:27am
|
Reply
211
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
The preview pages show 164 uncensored movies.
|
11-26-08 09:27am
|
Reply
212
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Thanks! I'm hoping they'll fix the negatives because they are mainly technical errors in nature. I understand that re-encoding the movies is a big task, especially since they have over 500 of them, but at least they could post the newest ones in a larger resolution. The ads - while they don't hinder searching - it is just bad form... and annoying.
|
11-26-08 09:19am
|
Reply
213
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Poll
Unless the current sites I happen to be subscribed to feature really good streaming options, I would say I download at least a scene daily. Often more than that.
|
11-25-08 10:23pm
|
Reply
214
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Thank you for such kind remarks - I hope to maintain this standard in all my reviews (though granted some of my earliest reviews were a bit weak).
|
11-25-08 08:20am
|
Reply
215
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
farnsbarns1's Review
That is wonderful news about the end of the reign of DRM at GGG! I've been waiting for that day for many years, and have signed up multiple times despite it (and as I have ways, tedious ways but still ways, around it).
As for your Con about the video style - I certainly understand how you could hate it. It is extremely harsh, makes much use of being hand held and the sets and costuming are aggressively unpolished. However, having watched years of John Thompson's work, I assure you this is very intentional and the camera operators are quite skilled. Despite making use of the mobility of a hand held camera (shooting extreme low angles, between appendages, et cetera) rarely do their videos exhibit that nauseating shaking and lost sense of purpose (aiming randomly around the scene). So my point is simply that they have developed this look and maintain it quite diligently - while I would never photograph a scene this way myself, I fear GGG wouldn't quite be the same without that style. It is the type of pornography that still manages to polarize people, and that is admirable in a society that is so numb to so much.
Anyway, thanks for the interesting review and the good news.
|
11-23-08 05:30am
|
Reply
216
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
True Alex's Reply
Good to know! The Canon 5D is a very respectable camera and usually doesn't exhibit that massive amount of noise seen in the high res samples nor the auto focus mishaps. I wish I could afford a camera of such a level. If he is Canon fan, that would no doubt explain the noise produced by the older camera.
So please do update those high res samples! I doubt I'm the only photography freak that would be worried by those. Thanks to your response however, I will be moving the site up to high priority for review as I do like Skokoff's style in choice of models, poses and sets as shown on the preview pages.
Also, it is always nice to see that webmasters do take notice to the site. Cheers!
|
11-23-08 05:15am
|
Reply
217
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Indeed JPEG artifacts can be a villainous sort, but do not appear to be the perpetrators in this case. Still, the models are quite fetching and the photographer has a well developed style. I will certainly keep an eye on this site. Thanks for the engaging review.
|
11-23-08 02:45am
|
Reply
218
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
How is the full resolution photo quality? I just went through the photo galleries section of their tour and while I like the models and the poses, I was a bit stunned by the lack of image quality in their high resolution examples. The photos had tons of digital noise and it looked like the auto focus might be a bit off. Despite seemingly nice lighting, sets and props, I'm guessing that they are using a rather low end DSLR camera. My Nikon D50 honestly shows less noise in its photos - and it retailed at around $600. Maybe they are using a low-end Canon. Are these examples relevant to their latest work?
|
11-23-08 01:44am
|
Reply
219
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Go to their tour page linked off of this site, then click the "Extended Tour" button at the top of the page and if you follow that tour, you will see what they call the "Action" section. That is what you are looking for.
|
11-22-08 02:53pm
|
Reply
220
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Sickboy3's Reply
Blast, that is unfortunate.
|
11-19-08 06:02pm
|
Reply
221
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
lol, in a sense, but usually that is a more rudimentary download manager. The one I always recommend is DownThemAll! - it integrates directly with Firefox (meaning it pulls passwords from Firefox so you don't have to remember them) and has tons of sweet features like Download Acceleration (which I rarely use), downloading all the links on a page and so on.
|
11-19-08 10:31am
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Yes, as I had mentioned, 30 years ago it was certainly still quite a big deal. Though I must disagree with the comment that "as well as no black women in porn of any kind" - my pin-up favorite Sylvia McFarland is evidence of that. I'll grant you that black women were less visible in main-stream porn, no doubt - but if you had the motivation (and time and money), it was available.
As for the contrast in color, that can be interesting, but I find the novelty of it wears off quickly and then what keeps the scene alive is the performance itself and the attractiveness of the performers as well. A simple contrast of color will not support a scene for me. Though it must be said it could add that hard to describe x-factor that can make a good scene into a great scene. So, that all said, that is why I find it somewhat silly that it remains an established niche.
|
11-19-08 10:21am
|
Reply
223
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Sickboy3's Comment
Have you actually had your account disabled for doing this? I only ask because I regularly use a download manager on a sister site ATK Natural & Hairy and have never run into an issue. I do limit my manager to one connection at a time however. Takes a bit longer but I find not doing that upsets many adult sites.
|
11-19-08 09:17am
|
Reply
224
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As a niche I've always found it a silly distinction. I understand how it used to be taboo as little as 30 years ago but these days the fact that it is still considered an important fetish amazes me. I'm much more interested in attractiveness and skill of the performers - granted their skin color can be a factor in their attractiveness but not hinging upon its relation to their partner's skin color. So while I have found many scenes that I love that fall in the Interracial category, I don't by any means specifically hunt for that content.
|
11-19-08 09:10am
|
Reply
225
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Well, Mr. Kinsey, usually I find it's when the circus midgets begin slapping the horse's rear with the bag of meat. This is anonymous, right?
|
11-17-08 08:39am
|
