| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
101
|
Exclusive Teen Porn
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good quality video. Most have AVi or WMV at 1280x720. Although this suggests HiDef, it is not quite...although at around (I would estimate)3500 kbps it is damn good nonetheless !
Around 50 half-hour vids available in clips or whole films. Fulls are around 500MB in size.
Fast connection speeds - just as well !
3 sizes of photos. Around 50 sets. Good quality |
| Cons: |
Needs to grow some more.
No free cuddly toys...none really. can only get bigger. |
| Bottom Line: |
Just joined the exclusive network and gained access to 10 sites - all teen stuff.
Gorgeous girls and good variety. Excellent choice of pic sizes, vids in clips or full...and excellent quality.
As part of a 10 site $30 package who could complain.
Worth the price for a month, even it were on its own !
Will report on other 9 as I visit them ! |
|
01-08-08 08:05am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
102
|
Little April
(0)
|
|
01-08-08 07:20am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
103
|
Little Summer
(0)
|
|
01-08-08 05:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
104
|
Milton Twins
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nice girls.
Reasonable qualaity of video
Easy to navigate
Cheap if you join through TeenRevenue |
| Cons: |
Little variety
Not many vids (around 20)
All the same really.
Only about 2 or 3 with a man |
| Bottom Line: |
Don't even bother unless it's part of a package deal -Teenrev - too boring and repetitive and no updates.
Someone should get these girls and do something decent - what a waste ! |
|
01-08-08 05:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
105
|
Little Lupe
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots ( around 50) of long (around 25mins) vids
Very young looking
Good variety
Very cheap if you join through TeenRevenuePass for 10 days
Gorgeous eyes...yes eyes! |
| Cons: |
Terrible filming:
Exposure constantly shifting - clearly used too strong uni-directional lighting: ie didn't really have a clue - what a shame
Photos appalling - massive watermarks across the middle
She "never" talks -shame |
| Bottom Line: |
As with many sites, you give a bloke some cash and a camera...and some lovely willing girls, and they make a total hash of it.
This site personifies this truism. The cameraman hadn't got a clue about lighting and exposure although the director has at least got some imagination - it may the same person !
So the colour, contrast and brightness is all over the place.
Send him to night school on a photography course - he needs it.
Real shame actually...as this girl deserves good quality Hi-Definition - oh she really does !
But don't give a Hi-Def camera to this guy - the earth would probably end up being swallowed by a black hole ! |
|
01-08-08 04:54am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
106
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Reply
Yes I agree with you to a degree...if the filming takes place at their home country.
I just get the feeling - though I'm not 100% sure of course - that they are probably filming in the west and possibly being taken advantage of.
But of course that could happen to anyone...
|
01-06-08 11:51am
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
10 by 8 all the way.
|
01-05-08 08:08am
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Yeah me too - it's difficult scrolling and changing pics with one hand...! hehe !
|
01-05-08 08:07am
|
Reply
109
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
Totally agree with your commments on bad direction and technical work. This is made even worse when these "professionals" start playing with Hi Definition. HD is notoriously difficult to use well. They should really be sent on a course...what a waste some of these sites are...they have cash and willing girls but can't produce a decent movie to save their lives.
HiDef shoud not be held held unless absolutely necessary. This type of fil making could easily be 80% tripod based...but no...and the exposure/lighting is all to pot as well. Some of these guys may as well use a cellular phone...it would be cheaper and give just the same results.
The eastern European ones are the worst culprits. They really need a wake-up call !
Rant over.......Happy New Year !
|
01-05-08 08:06am
|
Reply
110
|
Seventeen Video
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Well if you like young looking teens wearing headbands and tennis socks, you can't really beat it - just search for the high 2000kbps vides - around 20% of the total - each part is around 120MB - and you can't go wrong at any price really !!!
|
12-19-07 07:56am
|
Reply
111
|
Seventeen Video
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
Yes there's no problem with the members area - other than having to download a DVD in 10 pieces and only being allowed 1 connection per time for the high res movies.
Don't know what up with the smaples .... ! ?
|
12-19-07 07:54am
|
Reply
112
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I've noticed that a lot of sites do this.
The scenes are mixed up randomly so it's virtually impossible to track the site and tell how often the "updates" are.
disgraceful, but with review sites like this their days are numbered !!!
|
12-11-07 04:01am
|
Comment
113
|
Young 18 Teen
(0)
|
|
12-11-07 03:40am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
114
|
Seventeen Video
(0)
|
|
12-11-07 02:59am
Replies (4)
|
Review
115
|
Only Cuties
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1. Very nice-looking girls
2. Superb quality of video
3. Multiple Downloads
4. Fast Connection Speeds
5. Good Value |
| Cons: |
1. Most of girls are very shy - chat is virtually non-existent
2. Bad direction
3. All Eastern European girls - possibly explains the above 2 comments
4. Not all in Hi Def by any means |
| Bottom Line: |
I felt I should review this site as the current score is, I feel, way too high.
Yes it's mainly Hi Def (around 75%) and yes there is a bonus site - Hannah - but her site is all solo or girl-girl and she never speaks.
Personally, the new influx of Eastern Europeans to the porn industry has mixed blessings imo.
Firstly, they are gorgeous - no doubt about it.
Secondly, they seem willing to do anything; this site has a good balance of girl-girl, girl-boy and solo.
But, the directing is poor and unimaginative - these videos are very 'samey'. They are VERY repetitive in terms of the few locations they use and the way the films are made.
They barely talk - even to each other - making it all very "sterile".
All in all...once the novelty of the lovely girls and the good video quality has worn off, you are left with a less than inspiring series of repetitive and dull scenarios.
So, in relation to the other sites I've reviewed, it has to marked down.
Great video quality and gorgeous girls does not necessarily make great porn...and this site demonstrates this fact perfectly.
Good potential, but needs to develop - bring in some decent western European or even American directors and it could be a great site. |
|
12-11-07 02:43am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
116
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
cwpuk's Reply
Yes, thanks for that. I just joined and got free access to Hannah.
Gosh she IS flexible !!!!!!
I feel a review of both sites coming on.....pretty good at first sight !
|
11-21-07 01:54am
|
Reply
117
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Both my friend.
Hannah is Eastern European. she has started appearing alot, in the more recent Club Seventeen material as well.
Many of the girls in Only Cuties are european - hence they don't say much.
Nearly all the updates in the last few months on ClubSeventeen video feature a large proprtion of them.
They are cheap labour and many production companies are taking advantage of this.
Upside is...they are gorgeous; downside is...they don't talk much...and if you're like me, you end up goping on a guilt trip.
|
11-21-07 01:50am
|
Comment
118
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
|
11-19-07 02:15pm
Replies (5)
|
Comment
119
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
|
11-19-07 02:10pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
120
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
cwpuk's Reply
Thanks for that matey.....appreciated
|
11-19-07 01:45pm
|
Comment
121
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
|
11-06-07 06:24am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
122
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
What I meant was a 'proper email address': ie. one linked to an isp as opposed to Hotmail or Yahoo.
It may just reduce spammers if you see what I mean, although I can appreciate some problems with certain isp's as you say.
|
08-30-07 02:42pm
|
Review
123
|
Cindy 8teen
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1) Very pretty and young-looking girl
2) Very teasing in nature
3) Cheap if you're in the UK !
4) A few of the vids are good HD quality in parts (see below) |
| Cons: |
1) Awful filming - seems as though its done by her best friend using a rented camera.
Although the resolution suggests its high def, it shakes about too much of the time and the lighting is all wrong.
2) She is very shy and none of the photos or videos show full frontals - although she does bend over - all the time! Clearly a very defensive posture.
3) No dirty talk or dirty anything
4) The softest porn site I've ever seen.
5) Videos only 1 minute long - total vids = 36 - yes, only 30mins |
| Bottom Line: |
With only half an hour of 'hi-def' (arguably) video, and short, repetitive photos of dubious quality, no full frontal nudity and very little in the way of sensuality - I feel a little ripped-off.
I downloaded the entire site in 2 hours - as the fastest speed was around 150 kbps.
Steer clear unless you really like her.
Be warned she does look very young - too young really, especially in the photos with barbi vest etc on. I felt rather uncomfortable looking at the photos.
Overall, it looks like something put together over a weekend by 2 bored 18 year olds......what a shame...give me a camera and a weekend and I'd make her more famous than Leah Luv !!!!!
Really not worth joining at the moment. IF she loosens up a little and shows us her vag - from THE FRONT !!! (wierd - I've never known anything quite like it really !), then it MAY be worth looking at again in around 18 months time.
(at an update rate of 3 minutes of new video a week.....er, well you do the math !)
Follow-Up:
Looked in again 3 weeks on. 3 more 1 minutes of teasy video - appalling. We are looking at around 1 hour of video per year in updates - this must be the most expensive site ever.
Leave it well alone if I were you. |
|
08-30-07 01:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
124
|
My Sexy Kittens
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fast download speeds...I had 2 clips downloading and the max. speed of my IP connection – 750k was shared between them.
429 Photosets - good quality too.
263 Videos. HQ Video for 90% of them - each 15mins long at over 2Gbps bitrate...one of the best out there.
Lovely young-looking girls - that look like their having fun - I can tell they are !
Reasonable number of simultaneous download/surfing connections. |
| Cons: |
Not many really.
No real hardcore stuff...you need to go elsewhere for that.
Downside...None of the vids or photos are labelled – you have to give each clip a name – I use the name, date and number of clip. Only 2 simult. downloads, but you can at least surf the rest of the site at the same time.
This is still better than some sites which limit speed and/or d/load conns.
No full clips |
| Bottom Line: |
HQ Video for 90% of them - each 15-20mins long at over 2Gbps bitrate...one of the best out there.
Very similar in look and feel to Seventeen Video – nice, gentle sex – no violence or gory stuff. All girls appear to be from Eastern Europe – this is clearly Seventeen’s attempt at breaking away from the Dutch girls which seem to frequent their films.
Best point is video quality - up there with the best.
Second best point: no Americans anywhere - hehe !
Sorry guys - no dis-respect intended; I just don't like American porn.
Well worth the 30 euros entry - although the American dollar may not agree at the moment.
For me, the videos of Chrissy - alone - are worth the entry fee....which for us in the UK is around 8 pints of Beer.
The company that owns this site is the same Dutch company that owns Seventeen. This makes feel happier that the girls are not being exploited by Eastern European mafiosa types...which I always worry about. So confidence is restored !
75 Hours of Video are worth the cost. don't know if there are any updates - they claim around 2-3 new vids per week. |
|
06-30-07 06:29am
Replies (0)
|
Review
125
|
Seventeen Video
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The higher quality vids are pretty good at >2000kbps.
Subject material excellent - I'm personally a big fan so I cannot fault it.
Some vintage stuff from the '70s etc on the site also.
Updates only ONE video per week - look to be at highest available quality. |
| Cons: |
Club Seventeen have literally thousands of DVD's across a number of series. Unfortunately - on this site you don't get access to more than a fraction of them.
Example: Teeners from Holland, has over 100 editions but on this site you get access to FOUR....yes "4". So, only around 5% per cent of the vids are available at 2000kbps. All the others - yes 95% (!) are at a measly 600 kbps - not even worth bothering with - although a few are at 960kbps.
No option for full DVD downloads. |
| Bottom Line: |
Even with only around 25 DVD's worth downloading - at 2 hours each on average, that makes for around 50 hours of teen heaven for 30 Euros - not bad really. So it's worth joining for the one month.
I'll leave it for 12 months until I rejoin - by then another 50 or so of their collection, should be available at the decent resolution of 2000 kbps - making the effort worthwhile.
Also, downloading is a bit of a hastle - the number of scenes each DVD is split into is too large for it not to be a pain in the ass - typically each vid is split into 10 - 15 micro-scenes.
This can also be a little misleading given the editing style of some of the series' whereby 4 or 5 "activities" are shown occurring simultaneously - so being selective as to which scenes you download can leave you with incomplete scenes essentially.
Better would be to allow the full download in one go.
Finally, before updating with new titles each week, perhaps they should concentrate on making the existing titles available at the highest resolution. When only 5% of the vids you look closer at, are at a decent resolution, it becomes very annoying.
Follow-Up:
Having joined again after 6 months, they are clearly adding a new full DVD (90 minutes) each week....all at around 2MBps bitrate - which is OK.
Must say I still love this stuff...and paying 30 Euros (around $40) for 26 DVD's each 6 months is is no problem for me.
As the proportion of Higher Quality stuff is now increasing rapidly, I have increased the score accordingly. |
|
04-28-07 10:38am
Replies (1)
|
