| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Seventeen Video
(0)
|
Reply of
diZZy's Review
What proportion of the vids would you estimate are in the higher 2000kbps quality ? The samples seem to be a mixture.
Until recently, Seventeen only allowed streaming of low quality versions, so things are looking up !
|
04-27-07 08:33am
|
Comment
127
|
123 Lacey Pink
(0)
|
|
04-27-07 06:24am
Replies (5)
|
Review
128
|
Teen HDV
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good quality vids - what there are of them.
Photos are ok. Nice girls. |
| Cons: |
Some of the girls advertised on the Main Page cannot be found in the videos section once you go through the "members entrance".
General navigation is atrocious. You really need to suss-out the indexing system and type in consecutive numbers in the url bar to find the "bio's" which show the links to the 16 girls that do have videos - which should not really be necessary !
And still - no sign of the one's I was interested in though ! |
| Bottom Line: |
OK - if you are hooked on HiDef - otherwise, better value and variety elsewhere.
Wrote 3 emails to complain - no answer to any.
No updates - so - be warned. |
|
04-27-07 06:14am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
129
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
|
03-27-07 10:58am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
130
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
|
03-27-07 10:50am
Replies (2)
|
Review
131
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots....and lots of gorgeous models.
Lots of variety including outdoor/voyeur stuff - if that floats yer boat.
One of THE best videos I've seen of Leah - "we are not worthy !" Luv..... worth the entry fee on its own. |
| Cons: |
Dowload speeds not too great.
Only around 1/3 of the vids have the "higher" 2000kbps bitrate - although this will presumably increase as new vids are added.
Photos a little sparse and not great quality on the whole.
Worth joining for the variety, but better teen sites are available as first choices. |
| Bottom Line: |
Worth joining for the variety, but better teen sites are available as first choices. |
|
03-27-07 10:43am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
132
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
Just joined the site for a 3 day trial - the price of 2 beers....as I suspected....no real HiDef at all.
Only around 10% of the Vids are in 2000kbps - not bad, but far poorer than your proper 720p such as Brooke Sky.
The other 90%, although they are advertised as HiDef on the previews, they are not.
They are very mediocre quality - same as the samples.
Also, Most are in multiple parts - and they are not titled - you gotta do it manually for every part.
Nice girls though and good photo quality. Shame about the gross mis-representation !
|
02-17-07 12:50pm
|
Comment
133
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
|
02-17-07 11:41am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I agree that is a step forward to prevent abuse: however, another sign that even a "registered" user may well be a person with a financial interest in certain sites and may be attempting to "skew" results, is if an individual is reviewing "too many" sites.
Very few people can afford to join more than say 2 or 3 sites a month.
Also, make sure people can only register with IP email address, ie. don't allow yahoo or hotmail etc.
Regards
|
02-08-07 03:28am
|
Comment
135
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
|
02-08-07 03:17am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
136
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Yes indeedy...see my reviews on mayors network......apparently porn studios, or rather the stars, are a little reticent about HiDef....it means complete body makeup -- yuk !
So, I qualify my "yes" vote - not for stuff that's too hardcore. I wanna porno film in the end, not a gynaecology manual.
The problem I've noticed with the relatively small amount of HiDef available, is the overuse of closeups...the irony is clear of course: the whole point of HiDef, imo, is that you no longer NEED to use closeups - so, yes, but thw whole approach to direction and filming needs rethinking !
|
02-08-07 03:09am
|
Review
137
|
Snatches
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality of HiDef Vids.
Very naughty, lots of close-ups - if you too have a 50" Plasma - you have been warned !!!!! |
| Cons: |
Very slow site.
Of all the mayors network, this is the slowest, which, given the fact that the highest quality vids are like 500mb, means it can take 2 hours to download.
I am getting speeds at the other sites (eg. CaseyHays and Brooke Sky) of around 300kbps, whilst this one is lower than a 100kbps at times, sometimes going up to around 175 kbps which is shared if you try to download multiple files - so if you want the good vids, be prepared to wait !
Not a huge amount of stuff yet |
| Bottom Line: |
Only worth admission as part of the entire Mayors Network, or if you really like HiDef close-ups - or if you are a budding medical student - nuff said I think ! |
|
01-23-07 02:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
138
|
Snatches
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I sent an email to snatches.com, and I have successfully managed to get access using my network pass.
So that's good news ! - if you have any problems - just sling 'em an email !
Bad news is.....well, you'll have to check out the review !
|
01-23-07 02:27pm
|
Review
139
|
Brooke Skye
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nice, Nice and more Nice !
She is a very sexy girl, and the duo's are very cool.
Quite a lot of HD vids: around a third of the total 150...not bad really. |
| Cons: |
All movies a little too short.
Could talk a little more and the vids seem to stop just as they get going. clearly uses the smae director/producers as the other girls in this network. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall: good value if you like pretty teens in soft/medium - core mainly-solo scenes.
But with access to a bunch of other sites (Mayors Network) and considering the cost of $17.99 - represents very good value.
Beware, you will have to hunt around for the "best" way to access the network. Not all the sites allow you to join via the "reviewers special" for $17.99 recurring.
Site on its own, would score around 80 % for me - just, but given the other sites....89 %
If vids were longer - mind you CaseyHays are even shorter at around 7 mins average, compared to 10-11 mins for Brooke - would score 90% |
|
01-15-07 02:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
140
|
Snatches
(0)
|
|
01-15-07 01:58pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
141
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
Just thought I'd add my 2 cents worth.
I feel the future is HiDef. I live in a place where we have no freedom of speech - the UK.
The only DVD quality porn we can get hold of, that is not censored, is via the net.
Please help the UK users by pushing HiDef, not so much as a "nich", but a requirement in the 21st Century.
Believe me, playing HiDef vids (720p min,.)- not that there many yet - via a decent HDMi cable to a large LCD or Plasma is a joy to behold !
The added benefit is that being compressed by wmv HD codecs they are certainly worth the extra space on the old hard drive, or on a regular DVD R disk. Due to the compression factor, you can still get a full 2 hours of movie on a 4 GB disk !
So I would really like to see the HiDef "niche" on your main site, promoted to full prominence on the site index.
Regards
|
01-12-07 01:59pm
|
Rating
142
|
Mayor's Network
(0)
98.0
|
No Review.
|
01-12-07 01:47pm
|
Review
143
|
Casey Hays
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Choice of quality: 400 kbps to 4 Mbps HiDef – ie. better than DVD.
Most of the time, picture quality is very impressive - especially viewed via component cable/HDMi on a HD Plama/LCD TV. But, close-ups are ruined by poor lighting and poor exposure compensation - unfortunately this really grates after a while and the over-reliance on close-ups makes this a real issue in my opinion. Casey is a cutey - let's see all of her ! I don't need a 42" nipple on my TV ! But, HiDef is new tech. |
| Cons: |
Only 35 episodes thus far.
5-10 minutes each and best quality videos are 250Mb each !
Only 1 or 2 short updates per week, no interaction or Live shows - yet !
A little more variety would be welcome. Maybe some girl-girl stuff as with the other girls on this network. At least this would relieve the boredom factor that often blights these solo-girl sites and indeed attract repeat subscriptions.
Way too much use of the zoom function - Man this guys clearly got a new camera for Xmas ! |
| Bottom Line: |
This this is NOT a “hardcore” site – it is meant to be more of a “glamour” site – with very judicious use of toys/masturbation etc. But, if like me, you are a fan of this striptease, titilation genre, and if you think Casey is hot, which she certainly is (!) then you should join her site and you won’t be disappointed !
Only a few, recent videos involve anything juicy – masturbation, toys etc. and even then they are pretty conservative. To be fair however, the site is not advertised as a hardcore solo site anyway, so if that is what you’re after – visit Leah Luv – I do - often, and gosh she IS naughty !
All in all, pretty tame stuff although pleasant to watch - until Mr Zoom makes an appearance, which he does way too often !
Could do with being a little more raunchy, if only by having Casey talk a little more - I sometimes feel lonely watching her - but you can’t please everyone all of the time !
Finally, although Casey appears to be enjoying herself, it's not in the "right" way. I sometimes feel she may as well be having photos taken in the park rather than doing what is after all a "porn-shoot" ! But to be fair, she is relatively new to it and she is so utterly gorgeous - so I ain't gonna complain ? !
The score here is the score it would deserve if you had access to just Casey's site for $17.99.
Note: Mayors Network (reviewed elsewhere) includes a bunch of similar bonus sites making it an absolute bargain ! HiDef is the key selling point here - quality !
|
|
01-12-07 01:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
144
|
Mayor's Network
(0)
|
|
01-12-07 12:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
145
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
No Probs.
As I said, it may just be me, but it is the ONLY site I have ever had problems with - perhaps they use an unusual codec which conflicts with some drivers on my specific system. These things happen sometimes !
Regards
|
01-12-07 12:43pm
|
Comment
146
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
01-12-07 08:43am
Replies (4)
|
