| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
126
|
Bongum.com
(0)
|
|
07-25-10 03:33am
Replies (4)
|
Review
127
|
66 Latex
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Pictures have decent resolutions of 2000x3000
Galleries are offered in .zip format
87 galleries online with about 50-90 pics per set
Some tight and transparent outfits show plenty of skin and cameltoes |
| Cons: |
No videos
Only 8 models with moderate appearance, some at best moderate
Boring standard posing of the models in front of monochrome backgrounds
Very uninspired and not sexy site
Content and price/month are in no relation to each other |
| Bottom Line: |
This site looks like a poor copy of Rubber-models.com, but without videos, hot and juicy models and nicely shot galleries in front of interesting backgrounds. So to say, there is nothing left, which can be claimed worthwile to look at. I was a member for one month and barely downloaded a full gallery for my archive. This site is a good example for a failed attempt in relation to rubber, latex and fetishism. I wouldn't recommend to join. |
|
07-24-10 08:13am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
128
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes, I have the latest VLC version. I think it has something to do with the DRM crap. The Adobe player asks for my Member ID and password. Other players don't and consequently don't play. It's the only explanation I have so far...
|
04-03-10 11:20am
|
Comment
129
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
|
04-03-10 02:24am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
130
|
Dry Humping.net
(0)
|
|
04-02-10 12:32am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
131
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
OnlyAllSites's Reply
It's working now. Downloaded 1.5Gigs without problems. So there was indeed a problem with my account. Sumimasen.
|
03-08-10 10:54am
|
Reply
132
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
OnlyAllSites's Reply
Thanks for the reply Matt.
Yesterday I had no chance to get a log in. Today it's working again, so it has the appearance of a DL limit/day. But OK, maybe I am too paranoid.
|
03-08-10 10:28am
|
Reply
133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I once saw a documentary about a male reporter taking part in a porn casting. If the pressure for female actors is the same as for males (apart from the pressure to keep a hard on for some long time) I would certainly (and have) vote "Didn't know women have orgasms". So, I think (fake) orgasms are just part of the job.
|
03-07-10 11:08am
|
Comment
134
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
|
03-07-10 10:54am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
135
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Yeah, I agree that 65 is damn low for such a site. I am a member now for 2 months or so and still not bored. And they DO have more than three models, that's for sure. The girls are cute and they are not overacting like on some other sites. And the focus on anal play is just nice. But OK, ten people ten colours...
|
03-06-10 12:32am
|
Reply
136
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
carteresque's Review
I aborted my membership because of the DRM stuff. If you don't subscribe you can no longer watch the videos.
Nobody with a sane mind should support such a shit, though I really love this site. It really hurt to leave it.
|
01-31-10 02:01am
|
Comment
137
|
TS Latex
(0)
|
|
01-17-10 02:09am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
138
|
Hot Rubber Babes
(0)
|
|
01-10-10 05:43am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
139
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
brucelee's Review
Don't think I am a smart ass, but what was the additional information in your review compared to mine? I would have appreciated some different point of view, but it's also the same as in the first review.
|
12-10-09 12:43pm
|
Reply
140
|
Femdomme World
(0)
|
Reply of
djwolf's Review
You should have seriously mentioned that most of the male slaves are obviously old, worn out and grey beyond belief. This reduces the fun seriously. I am only judging from the previews, so please correct me if I am totally wrong.
|
11-29-09 06:47am
|
Comment
141
|
Rubber Models
(0)
|
|
11-13-09 12:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
142
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some decent amount of videos:
47 videos (18 .wmv, rest .avi), resolutions are mostly 640x480, some .avis are in 1024x768,
running times approx. 5-10 min each (some less)
-Good amount of 40 galleries:
50-60 pictures each gallery, resolutions are 800x1200
-Charming Lucy is a real fetishistic beauty and looks great in rubber and latex garments
-Very personal and ambitious site
-Lucy likes to play with both women and men ;) |
| Cons: |
-All her new .wmv videos are DRM protected (I really, really hate this)
-Updates come about every week or so, maybe too less for some people
-No zips for the galleries (DownThemAll or some other program works good here)
-Resolutions of the videos and the pictures could be a little bit higher
-The plain site design may not be everyone's taste
-Some watermarks are reducing the fun of enjoying the pictures (they are often too large)
-A little bit pricy (25.95$/month) |
| Bottom Line: |
First of all I have to mention that I was a member for the last years every now and then (not continously), but I just signed up again a week ago, or so. OK, now the final remarks ;)...
One should know that Lucy is really into catsuits. She also wears dresses, leotards, stockings and (especially) hoods etc. but full covering catsuits are her favourites (mine too ;)). The locations for the shootings are various places, ranging from seasides to woodlands or her kitchen (doing the washing-up,covered in latex under her daily attire, for example). As I already mentioned, Lucy likes to play with girls, boys and herself. There is no censorship here, so if Lucy's pussy is displayed, you see it. I note this here because this is not always the case (at least in this immediacy) for other latex sites. The scenes in the videos feature her kissing other women and exercising mutual masturbation, giving blowjobs, fucking in latex and playing with huge blow-up dildos and strapons. She also likes bondage and a good whipping to her ass until it is red. This looks great under transparent latex! Most of the time she assumes the submissive role, but sometimes she also shows off as the dominant part. What I like most about the videos is the inconspicuous style. There is no background music, the camerawork is efficient and minimalistic and the scenes are intense beyond believe. Lucy is extreme quiet before she orgams but when she gets there it's an intense experience for the viewer. The other women are very attractive and they really knock the stuffing out of each other. It's like a glimpse into the intense secret sex life of real fetishists. As a concluding remark I would strongly recommend this site to any true latex fetishist. You will find some real treasures here, which are quite rare out there. (As I have not mentioned this before, the galleries are all unique and presented in a sharp and professional quality). |
|
10-24-09 10:32am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
143
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Thank you for this nice review.
Concerning the shortcoming of HD videos you are right. I am honestly asking myself why they make this much advertisement for HD if they don't keep their promises.
Concerning the photoshoot style videos, this is in fact a style which I like very much. At Latexotica.com they sell DVDs of their shootings and I bought a lot of them :).
One comment at the softcore nature of this site. It's in fact a great turn on for some people to look at high res pix of pantyhose clad asses or high heels etc. (btw you should have stressed that there are really high high res pictures on OT, sometimes too high for my taste). I forgot who said it but it's the "hidden" skin which enhances the eroticism and ones fantasy so it's understandable why there is so much lingerie out there ;).
|
04-17-09 12:38pm
|
Reply
144
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I joined this site about two weeks ago, so maybe I have not the complete perspective...
But what immediately attracted my attention was the bad camera handling in most of the videos. Sometimes it feels like you are on a rollercoaster when the camera is shifted to a different position and you can always hear some weird creaking of the camera support.
Just an observation...
After all the site's not bad (I am more the gallery freak, not the video type) but definitely not a 95 for me.
|
03-22-09 03:58am
|
Review
145
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Very attractive and vivaciuos model
-Regular updates about every 2 days
-Variuos stylish outfits and interesting locations for the photo shootings e.g. outdoors (seasides, countrysides, cities) or indoors (old castles, abandoned factories, bars)
Site started in 2003, so there is a reasonable amount of galleries:
-64 current galleries, 21 archive galleries, older resolultions are about 853x1280, all the newer galleries have 1067x1600, about 80-100 pics per set
-Viewing options include small,medium,large sized pics, all galleries come with zips (large pic sizes)
-Videos come in 1280x720 format and feature the photoshootings (RMVB and WMV options), newer ones have a duration of about 10-15 minutes (all videos with music, some with the model talking about her outfit and the scenery), streaming option available
-Nice forum in english or german about general disussions, announcements from the latex scene or suggestions for future shootings and user comments about the galleries |
| Cons: |
-Older galleries are rotated out on a regular scale, which is really a pity.
For example, I own about 128 galleries and the total amount of the recent galleries is about 90.
-The music in the videos may get on some people's nerves (mostly club sound or ambient music).
-Updates are splitted into parts, so a whole gallery of 100 pictures consists of about 5 updates with 20 pictures each
-It's a pricy site (38,8$ for the first month, 25,85$ recurring) |
| Bottom Line: |
There is not much in the Cons this time...
But, please keep in mind that I am speaking from my own "limited" fetishistic viewpoint. That means, it does not matter if it is a softcore site (though you can see Sway's boobies and pussy from time to time :)) etc.
What I really like about this site is that Sway and Norman take really care of the customer's wishes via the forum and the feedback possibilities within the galleries. There were some requests for showing scenes of Sway putting on her latex gear in front of the camera for example, and this was indeed turned into reality very fast.
Perhaps I have to stress that the photos are a constant ceremony for latex fetishists. They feature many catsuits, which I also really appreciate. Sometimes I was tempted to lick them off my screen (thank god they also have a small wallpaper section).
Some wish for the future maybe that the site should be careful not to slip into the total glamour side of this fetish. Since I am a member for some time now, I do miss some of the more "natural" or "native" work.
Finally, I would like to strongly recommend this site for every latex enthusiast out there (in spite of the high member fee of course). |
|
03-21-09 01:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
146
|
Shiny Dolls
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The models are mostly the girl-next-door type and look young, pretty and naughty
-Nice selection of tight and shiny spandex outfits look great on the models
-Some amount of picture galleries with acceptable resolutions (63 galleries, resolutions of about 833x1250, ~70 pictures each gallery) and zip files
-Quite a collection of videos (about 89 clips)
with resolutions of 1280x720 for the newer ones (only a few) and 720x480 for older ones, all in wmv format |
| Cons: |
-Plain site design and no options for picture sizes or video formats
-Video clips have a duration of 4 minutes on average, which is too short
-Maybe too softcore for some people; the galleries hardly show bare breasts or pussies (4 galleries breasts, one gallery pussy) sometimes a cameltoe; the masturbations in the videos mostly take place over the item the model wears but there are also explicit scenes
-The 3D galleries with computer generated models is too stereotypical and definitely no turn on for me.
-Updates come every week which maybe too slow for some people |
| Bottom Line: |
Though I listed the softcore nature of this site in the Cons it should be irrelevant for those which are specifically looking at the outfits, which look very nice of course.
But I have to say something more about the videos. Most of them are masturbation scenes or two girl scenes with some mutual rubbing and licking. There are also scenes with some virtual air fucking and dancing and teasing. Eventually there are also scenes with dildos and real fucking. But concerning the duration of the clips (as I said, 4 minutes!) and the fact that sometimes the models are barely truly touching themselves they are massively overacting, feeling engaged to moan before anything really happens. I don't like that, it spoils the pleasure for the viewer. It's OK for a half hour clip where no one could tell if it's real or not (and does not really care if it is played good), but this is somewhat disappointing. The pressure to present an orgasm no matter what is just no fun at all.
Coming to a conclusion the biggest Pro to join are definitely the galleries which are really, really nice concerning the amount and quality. For a long term membership I would recommend tight-clothes.com. It's doing the better job in some aspects. |
|
03-01-09 06:49am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
147
|
Bianca's Latex Lair
(0)
|
Reply of
Rubbergas's Review
I join this site from time to time, but they changed too much to the glamour side of the fetish for me.
|
01-23-09 12:30pm
|
Reply
148
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
I don't believe it, would be a miracle!
|
01-23-09 12:20pm
|
Reply
149
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Comment
Looks really nice, think I will give it a try.
|
01-10-09 07:55am
|
Comment
150
|
Hustler's Taboo
(0)
|
|
01-07-09 10:24am
Replies (2)
|
|
