| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from Colm4:
For those interested in this site, there haven't been updates since 2011(!) and the total number of videos is now 82.
It has some amazing scenes so if you like these kind of movies, joining for 1 month to download everything is still truly worth it.
|
10-20-16 11:22am
|
Reply
2
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from FeckAdmin:
We share similar values in terms of fresh, healthy, sex positive amateur women but after that the style differs. Their videos are more documentary style, with bright, fairly even lighting. We focus a lot on production style and lighting to create a mood, and our videos have sometimes been described as artistic (while still very explicit). They focus more on young (-23) women, and highlight their youth - we cover all ages. They are friends of ours and we recommend their site but a lot of people join both, as they get different things from each.
|
01-22-14 02:18am
|
Reply
3
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from Basil445:
our videos are F4V (mp4) which playe perfectly on all players supporting this format and ALL videos are DRM FREE.
Hope you enjoy!
|
09-18-13 08:07am
|
Reply
4
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from FeckAdmin:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
With respect, you guys misunderstand our message. We don't deny we're porn - but we're GOOD porn. No faking, no lies about the quality and quantity of our content, genuine amateurs (mostly, a couple of our girls do mainstream porn as well), and high production values. And to the original poster, our stand on ethics isn't related to the content - it's how it's made, how the women are treated and paid, and the values represented. We don't judge people for their sexual perversions and in fact we dabble in them on the site from time to time, where the restrictions of the laws in our country allow. And we certainly aren't intolerant of any sexual act or flavour, you're quite wrong about that. Any consensual sex is fine with us (animals and children aside) but a lot of gonzo porn purports to show non consenting women, and we'd put that in the 'bad porn' basket as well, notwithstanding that it's fake. It's educating our kids, after all.
|
04-13-13 06:22pm
|
Reply
5
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from RubberTanja Co:
Hello Ergo Proxy,
Thank you for your amusing comment. From now on DRM protected videos can be watched after membership expired. In the beginning we didn't secure our videos, but due to extensive copyright violation (more than 600 videos on torrent sites), we integrated DRM.
Best wishes,
Bianca, Lena, Samantha and Tanja
|
01-08-13 02:41am
|
Reply
6
|
Lovers In Latex
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lyncher:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Thanks for your hint about writing a review and comment at the same time. After writing a comment I realized it would be better to write a review instead (more characters possible), but I couldnīt delete the comment.
However, the comment is deleted now for good ;-)
|
12-16-12 01:52pm
|
Reply
7
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
I know that you and I kind of enjoyed this site and I know that we would both be happy if there was more content. In my case I would have needed more variaion but content was still one of the sites biggest problem and made even worse by the small amount of updates and the high cost.
|
12-01-12 11:17am
|
Reply
8
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from pat362:
I'm not a member and don't plan to ever be agin but I only counted 96 videos in their update section while you had the total to 106 in June of this year and I had it at 76 in January 2011. The site ws never big to begin with and I personaly think that it's now dead. The sites was always on the expensive side and that hasn't chnaged so I highly recommend that you avoid joining because I fear you will be very disapointed.
|
12-01-12 11:04am
|
Reply
9
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Khan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
If it's a site we list, you're welcome to post a link to the site's listing page. Otherwise, you shouldn't be posting direct links to any sites.
If we don't list it but you feel it qualifies, feel free to drop us a line and we'll be happy to see if the site qualifies for a listing.
|
11-17-12 11:57am
|
Reply
10
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Ours is not a place for sharing free porn or links to free porn. It's not only tube sites.
|
11-17-12 11:28am
|
Reply
11
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RustyJ:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Fetishkitsch I've actually noted before and it looks quite good if somewhat limited (one couple, all black clothing etc.). I think they used to have review page here too but I cannot find one anymore.
Fetish wear, latex, bondage, hardcore, that's what would do it. No stuff inserted into men's cocks, not pissing everywhere and all the time. I guess that is mostly DVD stuff and even then quite rare. Private used to do some good stuff back in their days under Pirate label unless time has really messed with my memory. Also Tanya Hyde, wonder if there's online site for her stuff? John Staglione's Fashionistas was quite nice too.
Thanks for the info Khan, you posted while I was typing ;)
|
11-17-12 10:16am
|
Reply
12
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
FWIW, fetishkitsch.com had us pull their listing because they were going to close the site.
And please don't post a link to a tube site again.
|
11-17-12 10:07am
|
Reply
13
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Sorry, my mistake. I meant David Hamilton, not Peter Hamilton.
But David Hamilton has been accused of using under-age models, as well. But he used a soft-focus effect, which is a better term than a fuzzy effect. And Galitsin used the same kind of soft-focus effect in some of his photo shoots.
|
10-19-12 01:45pm
|
Reply
14
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Some of Ronin's photo shoots are still at MetArt. But it's probably been 6 years or more since he's had any new work posted at MetArt.
I'm not aware of any shoots that are in his artsy style that were posted at MetArt in the last few years.
I think that in the early days of MetArt, they were more accepting of different styles of eroticism. At least in some of their offerings.
But since then, they have mainly focused on more mainstream, less artistic photography.
Let me rephrase that. The far-out artistic style were always, at most, a very minor part of the MetArt offerings. And now they are even less on view.
Even the fuzzy (not a very appropriate term) of Grigori Galitsin photo shoots, which I thought were somewhat artsy, are not in evidence at MetArt today. But Galitsin was a different case, where he was accused of using under-age models. So all of his photo shoots were removed from MetArt, I believe.
But I thought Galitsin's shoots had a certain artistic quality, sort of in the Peter Hamilton style, with a fuzzy (I'm not using the proper term to describe it) effect to the photos.
|
10-19-12 01:28pm
|
Reply
15
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from marcdc1:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Thanks Ergo. No one upset here. I appreciate the dialog.
I went with the 95 because there is some great stuff here and i wanted to give credit to it (great in both quality, talent, and genre).
The trouble is there's also a lot of stuff that looks like it was ripped from a beta max in 1991 (Grainy encoding of 70s porn is disappointing).
To bottom line it: because there are individual producers having their work hosted at clips4sale there is a tremendous amount of variation. It's like I'm using a album reviewing website to comment about iTunes - it can be done but it's not designed to do it.
All the best-
|
08-01-12 04:54am
|
Reply
16
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from humiliatrix:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Not bots, I asked my sissies to post here since the older reviews expired.
Goddess Melissa
Humiliatrix.com
|
07-01-12 09:51am
|
Reply
17
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tboy:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
I know what you mean, she's a stunning model and the photos are ace, some really, really nice shoots and very vibrant photos.
The wait is too long for any non-hardcore fan, I definitely wont bother.
Also they split up videos and photos into sub-sets, so the 6 pages of videos with 24 videos per page does not mean 144 videos, but rather 36.
They could do some really simple stuff to make this all far nicer:
1) Give new members access to 3k res pic sets for all sets released after they join
2) Don't split up the videos
3) Keep the points idea, 1 point a day and allow access to your choice of archive pic set at 3k res for every 3 points.
Tboy
|
06-28-12 09:52am
|
Reply
18
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Thanks for this. I'm not a big fan of VLC but I may use it so I can at least have proper audio in the one scene that I really wanted from this site.
|
06-24-12 08:32am
|
Reply
19
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tboy:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Heya,
Yeah I decided to go with membership regardless, I got enrolled on 'super' rank which is pretty much is what I wanted for the moment.
Toby
|
06-23-12 02:14pm
|
Reply
20
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from tboy:
Out of interest, does her site still have that recruit/super/ultra access thing that was mentioned a few years back? I'm keen to join but only if I can pick up all the content...
|
06-22-12 10:56am
|
Reply
21
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from xexbot:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
I gave the score of 79 for that exact reason. I can appreciate that my cons may very well be your pros. I tried to keep my score at least within the range and focus of other reviewers. Personally, it might have been closer to a 69 for me, but like I said, how do you applaud a site for doing the minimum to be a good site. It functions, it's clunky, but it functions. LOL. At the same time, I reserve bad ratings for sites that truly screw us over. I don't think everyone will be screwed over by these guys, but I don't think everyone is going to be happy with their purchase either. Thanks for pointing this out though. At least some people are paying attention ;)
|
06-21-12 11:20am
|
Reply
22
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
from pat362:
Great review. I love the idea of lesbian strapon sex so a site like this is what I look for but this one is not really good. There is not a lot of content to begin with and the price is very high but I could overlook these things if what was available inside was in line to what I like. The models are all attractive and they are all well filmed but there is very little chemistry between the girls and too many of them can't properlly use a strapon and that's not very good in a site where strapon sex is the number one thing.
The fake cum does nothing for me but I can overlook it but I don't know if everyone else could.
|
06-07-12 06:59am
|
Reply
23
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from Lionheart:
I look forward for a review from you if you have the time. I love the free previews this site provides.
|
05-28-12 08:41pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from gaypornolover:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
To be fair ergo from a safer sex point of view, if she manages to stop it going in her eyes and her skin is unbroken, it's probably safer than intercourse without a condom, which seems to be standard in straight porn and still shocks me.
It is degrading I guess but no more than S&M type stuff.
|
05-26-12 01:30pm
|
Reply
25
|
Latex Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LatexRyan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
This site has no affiliation with either the old Latexotica or the new Latexotica. I don't know what the plan was, but I feel that this was an attempt to produce a spiritual successor to Latexotica (of course we now have a true successor with the re-opening later this year).
I personally never got the feeling that it was mass produced nor that it was generic. In fact I feel that it was as far flung from being mass-produced and generic as you can possibly get.
Latexotica was probably the first genuine multi-model latex site and after it's second revamp (the first being the change of name from Amateurlatex to Latexotica) it carved out a very specific niche, non-nude latex photography with a more adult edge, something which Latex Heaven has tried and - in my opinion - failed to do.
Latex Heaven feels far more mass produced than Latexotica ever was.
|
05-19-12 02:51pm
|
