| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
To me this is also a question that's not vital. As I'm a European I won't vote for this poll ;-).
America faces a lot of problems but that's true for the rest of the world as well. However wins the election should take care of questions that deal with matters like environmental pollution, unemployment, public transportation (which seems to almost not exist in most parts of the US), health insurance etc.
If I had a wish for the upcoming president of the United States it would be that this (wo)man takes lot of care of these issues!
|
05-31-08 03:08am
|
Reply
227
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Hi there,
it really depends on the site or the owner(s). One good examples is Alex from ALS who really listens to what his members say and he often replied to me when I wrote him. In some cases I received replies from those who work for him and I always had a good feeling about their answers.
Even better was/is the correspondence with the Crazies who run AO30. They also have a forum and Mrs. Crazies always reads there and tries to answer postings at least once per week. I know that they are quite busy but always take care to go in the right (the customer's) direction.
In both cases member's opinions changed a lot throughout time. Other sites where mostly lame when I wrote comments to the owners/staff.
|
05-29-08 12:43pm
|
Reply
228
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Strange enough to me that one site I wanted to send me their newsletter almost kills me with the amount of mails they send. It's Met Art to be more precise. I don't think they did anything bad with my mail address but why the heck are they sending several newsletters per week?
Superglam regulary sends mails saying they give away 100 memberships for free to the first to join but it seem like a bad joke to me. Still it is no spam as I asked them to send me their newsletters ...
Best practise is done by ALS. Every few months they send a plain-text mail offering a reduced membership to one of their sites.
I think the risen amount of spam has to do with the fact that one girl from Southern Charms sends her newsletter with addressed "to:" to all her members. She surely never heard about using "bcc:" ;o(
|
05-27-08 11:29am
|
Reply
229
|
Sell Your Sex Tape
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
To me it looks a bit to good concerning video quality plus all the couples seem to be good looking. But o.k. that's no drawback at all ;-).
Looks like an interesting site. Thanks for making me aware of this one!
|
05-26-08 10:10am
|
Reply
230
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Jep, that's not clear to me either. Thanks in advance for explaining this nbaby8.
B.t.w. is there a standard size for the pictures they offer? Looking at the previews I get different sizes but these are at least 1200px on the long side which is fantastic for a preview but I'd like to know if this is the best quality they offer.
Anyhow thanks for pointing me there as I didn't know the site before.
|
05-26-08 09:36am
|
Reply
231
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Thanks for the information but I'm not willing to pay for another download manager because I have one that works well with top sites like ALS Scan, ALS Angels and All Over 30.
You are right saying that we who pay have to have the chance to use such a tool. It's o.k. for me to limit the maximum number of connections per user but that's it. In my future reviews I'll make clear statements telling you if such a tool is working or not and any site blocking DL managers will get a not so good review.
To me it make absolutely no sense to block these tools as:
- paying customers get pissed if they have to start downloads manually or have to re-download stuff because no resume is possible
- other users get less bandwidth because of this
- the owners have to pay for more and unnecessary traffic.
|
05-25-08 10:17am
|
Comment
232
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
|
05-25-08 06:14am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
As with Epoch I usually get something like "Satisfied customer" or "No problem just moving on" which is my normal choice if I just wanted to have a quick view or as with some girls from Southern Charms just wanted to quickly download the newest sets.
|
05-25-08 04:06am
|
Reply
234
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Forgot to mention one thing and that is: sunglasses suck!
I hate to see models wearing sunglasses because you can't see their eyes. Normal glasses are 100% and can IMHO add a lot of attraction to a girl especially to one that has reached an age where we'd speak about the MILF thing.
|
05-23-08 12:30pm
|
Reply
235
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
The site looks interesting and they have some nice models to offer. I'm curious too but will wait for your review.
|
05-23-08 09:46am
|
Reply
236
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I hate those sets where the model has her eyes closed all the time. I love to see smiling faces and at least a few headshots in every set.
|
05-23-08 01:01am
|
Reply
237
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
What Alex send as a reply
> I am a quality freak and I will not be happy until everything we
> have is as good of quality that can be had :-)
> I know the Eva quality is still pretty bad but that is as good as
> her old footage and photos can get. We will have much better results
> from our entire Joanne shoot remaster coming in August as a bonus.
> Joannes video was shot on a different (and better) camera.
Hell, to know that Joanne's solo shoot will be available in remastered quality makes me go WOW! She is one of the hottest girls ever that came in front of Alex's lenses ...
All hail Joanne!
|
05-22-08 06:42am
|
Reply
238
|
Czech Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Looking at the front page I found this note "All rights reserved. All photographs and videos copyrighted. Copyright © 2004 - 2006 © CZECH-BABES.COM" which indicates that they last updated in 2006. Mmmh, that's quite some time ago ;-).
|
05-22-08 04:57am
|
Reply
239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Only certain sections, only pics but no vids or only lowres content. To me it doesn't make sense to support this and therefore I saw no to limited trials.
|
05-21-08 12:05pm
|
Comment
240
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
05-21-08 10:27am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
241
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Older sets come in lower resolution but are still worth looking at :). I liked the variety of models from the type of girl next, hippie goddess or tattooed chick to girls that looks so damn gorgeous it makes you cry!
Navigation was an issue when I was a member about 5 months ago. I was digging hard for some of the sets I downloaded plus I think that simonscans.com was not real download manager friendly. I might give it a try as soon as I have my faster connection which should be available in a couple of weeks.
Dildo action is most of the content that I have seen and I'd like to see other insertions like veggies or panties as well. Hell, I'm a dirty old perv! ;-)
|
05-21-08 10:21am
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
> I fell limited trial is a kind of a trap - and that seems like some
> kind of reason why these sites only have the limited...
Jep! Either you trust your content in means of quality and quantity which then results in a more than fair deal for those who are unsure or you only offer crap and then you'll also tend to offer limited trials. That's what I experienced.
> On the other hand I do join full trials quite a lot - at sites I never
> been before. If I like what I see, I normally go back for the full
> month deal.
I did that a few times and with sites that offer full trials I never went wrong.
|
05-21-08 09:19am
|
Reply
243
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Oh, and b.t.w. at $38.80 per month I'd also expect to have pictures sized at >3000px on the long side while still being sharp and crystal clear. ALS is a good example as they offer lots of content in good quality and up to 4 full picture sets per week plus 7 vids and the new stuff being HD quality.
|
05-20-08 10:50am
|
Reply
244
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
It's exactly the same situation that I was facing while being a member. Only a few updates in several months. Not exactly what they are promising to the public :-(
Thanks for this information!
Cheers,
Smut
|
05-20-08 10:11am
|
Reply
245
|
MILF Thing
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
I agree that the content looks interesting but there's not much available at the moment plus there's only one update peer week. Guess I'll keep an eye on that site and maybe join it within the next few months. Right now it would make sense to join if there was a chance to access for instance the new Fist Flush (also not much content over there) for a few dollars more ...
|
05-19-08 10:52pm
|
Reply
246
|
All Internal
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Wow! That's a real cool site. Thanks for sharing the information. I've never seen anything like this but will surely spend some time later to explore it.
Thanks again!
Smut
|
05-19-08 11:42am
|
Reply
247
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for answering Goldfish's question. As I'm much more into pics than videos and I do like a lot of the models being shown there I guess I'll give it a try.
Keep up the good work!
Cheers,
Smut
|
05-19-08 11:37am
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Well said and it's the same for me. It's nice to imagine to be able to see (good) porn all day and to write reviews about sites but first of all it's a very private and a fun thing for me.
If I like a site and want to criticize it I'm free to do as an amateur but when working for TBP or a similar site I'd have to even though it might not be fun to me ;-)
B.t.w. thanks again for giving us the opportunity to write our own reviews!
|
05-19-08 11:33am
|
Reply
249
|
Tiffany Preston
(0)
|
Reply of
Openmind's Review
Looking at the what's new box I realize that updates come from time to time but not 1 or 2 per week. There is a gap of almost one month without updates between March 19th and April 14th!
This is always annoying and surely she hasn't got enough updates to offer for a score of 98 points :-(
Just my 2 cents ...
|
05-18-08 10:03pm
|
Reply
250
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I'd like to know too. I was a member for more than six months about 1 1/2 years ago. I simply forgot to cancel my subscription because I was so busy at that time. After accidentally having found out that I was still paying I got extremely pissed because of their way of releasing photo shoots. Still I had shoots not being fully available!
Ever since I cancelled my subscription I get lots of mails saying that they give away memberships for free to the first 100 that subscribe ... I'm not stupid enough to give it a try I guess ;o)
|
05-18-08 12:26pm
|
