| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Very useful review man, thanks. The comments about the large file sizes and gynaecological close-ups really struck a chord, as I had exactly the same problem with In The Crack.com - it ceases to be sexy when it gets so close up and internal, and becomes more like a biology lesson. And the file sizes are massive.
I actually gave In The Crack a good review originally as it was so different, but it became boring very fast, and I'm guessing Give Me Pink will be the same, so I will avoid it and save my time and money.
|
09-06-08 05:26am
|
Review
152
|
Hanna's Honeypot
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-All girl (like it says on the tin)
-Mostly gorgeous young Europeans
-Technically nice quality widescreen vids |
| Cons: |
-Why give Hannah her own personal site? She's not that great looking, and there are many other girls featured on the site that would be a better choice IMO, and all better looking
-The sex is quite humdrum compared to others
-Very little analingus or deep cunnilingus |
| Bottom Line: |
I must admit, I only got this site as a bonus to joining Only Cuties, and wasn't expecting it, so I can't complain.
I have downloaded all the lesbian movie content (23 of them at the time of writing) and I find myself fast-forwarding through them to try and get to the hot action, which is thin on the ground.
There are loads of Hannah solo movies (not counted them - can't be bothered). She's really not a particularly attractive girl, so its beyond me why she has her own site when many gorgeous and hot babes do not. She also obviously prefers to pleasure her girlfriends with her fingers or a dildo, rather than her mouth. So cunnilingus is not as plentiful as on other all-girl sites. Although, when she does do it, she's actually quite good. Analingus is very rare on this site though.
Picture sets are generally tame, and often don't really 'get off the ground'. You feel the sets finish before they've really started a lot of the time.
I gave this an 'average' score, as I know from bitter experience there are still far worse sites out there. But it's still very uninspiring. I won't be returning. |
|
02-26-08 12:32pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
153
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Actually, good point Messmer. We have referred to it as an ass site because that is how it is promoted (i.e. the 'crack' refers to the ass crack, not the pussy).
But you're right - a great many videos and photo sets aren't centred around the ass at all. For people (like me) who really appreciate proper girly back door action, and with no men featured, I recommend Lez Cuties a lot higher than this site. :)
|
09-14-08 09:13am
|
Reply
154
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Very good point Drooler. The notes are very comprehensive. One thing that does get my goat though, is the number of times you see words to the effect 'this is probably one of the best anal scenes we've ever filmed' (for example). I must have seen that line a dozen times!
It also annoys me to read 'We must warn you that the lighting isn't very good/the orgasm looks fake/the girl has no passion' or whatever.
If it's that bad (and generally when the movie has a warning like this it *is* bad) then why bother putting the movie up there? Happily, these are still in a very small minority.
I also mentioned to the webmaster about the repetitive photos in the galleries. He responded by saying he takes lots of basically the same shot to make sure he has everything right about the shot when it comes to assessing quality, but then he can't bring himself to discard them so posts them all. I asked if maybe he could post both 'full sets' and 'condensed sets' but he said I'm the only one who ever complained about this and he wouldn't be doing that - which is fair enough I suppose. I'll just continue to 'prune' my own sets once downloaded.
|
03-08-08 08:09am
|
Reply
155
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Yeah - the 1280x720 movies are crystal clear on my 17" monitor, and the colours are so natural. I haven't felt the need to go higher than that (not that my processor could really handle it anyway).
To be honest though, I have downloaded the vast majority in the 640x360 version, after weighing 'picture quality' versus 'size of file on my hard disk' and 'speed of responsiveness of my media player'. I find these are still very good quality, and the close-ups are still very detailed. It just gets a little bit pixelly where there's fast movement, and the colours are a bit less vibrant. But the brain is very good at dismissing that, when the action is so hot.
|
03-07-08 04:31pm
|
Review
156
|
In The Crack
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Updated: |
09-06-08 05:59am (Update History)
Reason: My opinion has been modified, having had some time to re-evaluate the material.
|
| Pros: |
-Lots of rude, rude (I mean RUDE) anal girls
-Highly original site, quite unlike any other
-Technically brilliantly shot movies (seriously some of the best filming in porn I have ever seen)
-Ditto picture sets
-Movies available in range of download sizes
-Nice big archive
-Despite no official support - DMs do tend to work
-Responsive customer support |
| Cons: |
-Girls in the movies tend to lack passion
-Can get a bit repetitive and boring
-Not too clear on regularity of updates, or when new ones are due
-Some of the shots are very very close-up - when you see a pussy or asshole filling the entire screen, it can cease to be sexy, and start to look like a biology lesson
-No long all-in-one movies - but this is not a big prob - the parts are often several minutes and can be loaded into your media player's playlist for one long continual experience
-Picture sets have lots of near-identical shots, and need some serious pruning. Many could easily be a third the size, and be better for it. |
| Bottom Line: |
Imagine you have hired a sexy escort girl to come back to your place to give a private show, just for you. You're sitting back in your chair, and she stands right in front of you. She turns round, pulls her panties aside, and parts her ass cheeks to give a birds eye view of her tight asshole getting stretched open.
Well, that is how many of these movies start, and what a way to start! The girls often progress to striking all kinds of incredibly rude poses, generally focusing on their anuses. The camera gets in close, and doesn't miss a thing. Eventually, the girls masturbate, again with much ass play. Happily, dildos are not overused - you are as likely to see disappearing fingers as you are vibrators and toys.
There are also a few 2-girl sets inc. sensual massage + ass play.
The downside is, the action often seems contrived, moves at a very leisurely pace, and is very repetitive. The girls are clearly putting on a show for the viewer - which in itself is not a bad thing. But they never seem to lose themselves in abandoned passion. It's much more about showing off their bodies and sexual bits - rude exhibitionism, rather than images of girls masturbating and having fun getting off.
The picture sets have some amazing individual pics in them - but too often you will get about 9 pics in a row, all close-ups of an open pussy, and its like playing 'spot the difference'.
Still, top marks for originality. Ass fans should visit this fine site at least once.
UPDATE
I have lowered my score from 89 to 80, having had some time to re-evaluate the material. This is still within the 'very good' range as this is a very original site. But I find the passage of time since downloading the content has not been kind. The movies have become boring to me very quickly; I find myself fast forwarding through too many movies to get to an exiting part. There's just a lack of passion. Likewise, the photo sets have too much uninteresting filler, and too many near-identical shots that the webmaster probably couldn't bring himself to edit out.
Bottom line: this is a highly original site, but there are still hotter all-girl anal sites out there. |
|
03-06-08 03:12pm
Replies (16)
|
Reply
157
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Use a DM squire - FDM works great with In The Crack for movies, and DownThemAll is good for pics. Hopefully then, if a download fails, you can just pick it up again once the site is back up.
|
03-03-08 01:25pm
|
Reply
158
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I've had a couple of problems since joining the site a couple of days ago, where the site has suddenly gone off-line. And I've found myself randomly logged out on a couple of occasions, which led to all my downloads in my FDM failing and me having to load them all in again once I'd logged back in. Must be that OS issue.
The site has just gone down again. Now there's service for you - it not only dishes up hot babes - it goes down on you too.
|
03-02-08 02:39pm
|
Reply
159
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Amen.
|
03-02-08 03:55am
|
Reply
160
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Haha! Good points well made... EXCEPT: (!)
The point about guys in porn being considered 'props' and therefore we guys are more 'objects' than the women are. That's not a good parallel, as the 'prop' thing is coming generally from other straight guys, not women.
Bet Paul McCartney would relate to the Robin Williams quote right now!
|
03-02-08 03:53am
|
Reply
161
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Great review, Drooler. The token system is now gone. I literally joined this site for the first time in the last 48 hours, and am just blown away by the awesome camera work, both motion and still. I've been downloading like its going out of fashion, I just can't get enough of this style of content (i.e. ass worship). The newer stuff is also superior to the older stuff.
Good point about the 'objectifying' of the women. But in a sense, I think this is less objectifying than, say, catwalk models who are just there to look good and hang clothes on, and are void of personality. I think feminists overstate the whole 'sex object' thing and place way too much relevance on it. Personally, I like my porn performers to have some character and personality, and all the best porn stars are not necessarily the best looking, but are the ones that have warmth and personality. That comes across a lot on this site.
The 'anal twitching' comment - absolutely agree. It's interesting for about 0.3 seconds, we don't need to see it filling our screens for 10 minutes straight!
You mentioned 200-350 pics per gallery. What you have overlooked (if I may say so) is that a great many of these shots are very repetitive. I'm not really into playing 'Spot The Difference' (7 shots of an open pussy in a row at ever so slightly different angles) so I tend to prune my pic sets right down to something more concise.
I'm still gonna give this site a very decent score, as it is just so unique, from what I have seen. I read you were disappointed in the site (although your 83 score suggests it wasn't all bad for you - and that's despite the tokens!).
I feel it's too soon now, but look out for my review in the coming days or weeks.
|
03-01-08 03:03pm
|
Reply
162
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
I should also state that, as said by some others, this site no longer uses the token system of purchasing movies. You now simply pay your monthly fee ($35 right now, which is a little dearer than average, but I think worth it) and you have access to over 135 sets at the time of writing.
But it doesn't stop there. Each set often consists of anywhere from 1 to half a dozen 'subsets' - in other words, you click on a set's link, and suddenly you're presented with anything up to 6 full movies of the same girl, and occasionally even more (each split into smaller parts).
So I have to say this site is actually excellent value.
All movies are available in at least 640x360 (my preferred option here - it's reasonably detailed, doesn't take up too much disk space, and doesn't tax my processor too hard) and many are available in HD (files are huge though). It's a shame that 960x540 isn't offered, as that is my favourite res as it's damn near HD, but files aren't so big and my processor doesn't stutter when playing them. But 640x360 is still quite good IMO, obviously a step up from 21 Sextury's 400x300 ones.
I love that there isn't a huge emphasis on dildos - they do feature here and there, but fingers are used more, to finger and pull open those ass holes and pussies for the camera in the sexiest way imaginable.
I'll be writing a proper review with a score once I've fully assessed all the site's content. At the moment I'm thinking late-80s - even early 90s, as the site offers a style I have not seen elsewhere and am thoroughly enjoying. But I only joined today, so who knows how this may change.
|
02-29-08 06:26pm
|
Comment
163
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
02-29-08 06:03pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
164
|
Lesbians From India
(0)
|
Reply of
bbiillyy's Reply
That explains it then. I read English well, but my Sanskrit is a little rusty. ;)
I was only suggesting you get an English-speaking friend to proof-read your reviews for you - or at least use a spell checker. Just means more of us would enjoy your reviews, as more of us would understand them better. No offence intended. If someone picked me up on my poor Japanese skills, I would have to concede they were right! That's why I get my girlfriend to check anything I write in Japanese before posting it.
|
04-14-08 04:35pm
|
Reply
165
|
Lesbians From India
(0)
|
Reply of
bbiillyy's Review
I'm sorry, but I can't understand about 75% of this review - is it just me?
Please have someone who speaks/writes good English to proof-read your reviews!
|
04-12-08 09:42am
|
Reply
166
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Respectfully disagree my friend. Take 'Priscilla' for example (also known by other names elsewhere). She's absolutely drop dead fucking gorgeous, and pretty well known (pops up on Sapphic Erotica, Only Cuties, and the odd other site here and there).
There are loads of really fit girls on Lez Cuties (yes, many otherwise unknown), and I love that this site has many chicks that are not to be found in many other places.
The girls you mentioned (Sophie Moone, Eufrat, etc) are top shelf, and I adore 'em. But all the sites would look the same if they all featured those same girls, fantastic as they are!
Anyway, bottom line - for me, having mainly different girls to the other sites makes this site *less* boring, not more so!
Thanks for the comment anyway, and thanks for the compliment on my review!
Kind regards
(And it's Davit, not David!;) )
|
02-28-08 01:38pm
|
Reply
167
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Yeah - fisting is hot, especially when combined with licking. More of that would be nice.
|
02-27-08 04:14pm
|
Reply
168
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Some good points about Les Cuties. But I would disagree about featuring older girls. Don't get me wrong - I LOVE older girls. They can be even sexier and hornier than the younger ones. But this is a niche site that is focusing sharply onto one area - and that's in the title. Lesbians, and 'cuties' (and that means teens, or thereabouts, basically).
Agree too that higher def movies would be nice - although in all honesty, I don't mind these average-quality ones so much, as long as they continue to have such good quality content as they do (how many times have you seen a technically excellent HD movie and been bored to death? I know I have).
Completely agree about 'more fingers, less dildos'. That seems to be a commonly reflected comment on PU and I support it.
Your wish for lez orgies and peeing? Who could argue with that!
As it stands, there is only this site and the inferior Tushy Lickers that offer lesbian anal as standard that I know of. If you know of any others - or even solo girl anal with no guys - I would be interested to hear.
Regards
Davit
|
02-27-08 04:04pm
|
Review
169
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Very cute young Euro babes
-Lots of really hot analingus
-Good long anal gape shots too
-The girls seem to genuinely enjoy their activities
-Movie and gallery content quality is consistently very good IMO
-General production values (lighting, camera work, editing) is excellent
-High quality zipped galleries |
| Cons: |
-Updates come in bits; takes ten days to get a full 'all in one' update. Apart from for a few dial-up users in outer Mongolia, the small parts are pointless.
-Not a massive archive - but reasonable (was about 70 movies 4 months ago)
-Movie technical quality is not excellent - but still more than reasonable |
| Bottom Line: |
For me, weighing up the pros and cons, the pros have it by a mile. I really enjoyed my first visit to the site about 6 or 7 months back, so much so that I re-visited to get a few updates about 3 or 4 months later - although regretted this, as the value for money was obviously much decreased by that time for me.
Still, I now have a little under 70 quality lesbian-anal niche movies on my hard drive that I still like to re-visit when I need something that is guaranteed to give some quick no-nonsense relief. This is one collection that I can't see myself deleting in a hurry.
Pic galleries are nice and crisp and detailed and have some fine anal close-ups. Movies are all in small-screen format of the same kind of res as you'd find on the average 20 Sextury site (i.e. not excellent, but still good), and there's a refreshing lack of bullshit, just consistently hot all-girl fun, well filmed to capture all the detail you crave. And roughly a quarter of the content features threesomes. Even hotter!
A bigger archive and faster updates would push the score well into the 90s for me.
Bottom line:- Like lesbians? Like anal? Like cute Euro-babes? Then you'll love Lez Cuties! |
|
02-27-08 03:47pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
170
|
Lez Love
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Viv Thomas productions, so you know the quality
-Award winning DVDs to download in full...
-...with no DRM
-There were over 20 fully downloadable DVDs on the site when I was a member a few months ago - just think what 20 porno DVDs costs!
-Gorgeous sexy models: Cameron Cruz, Eve Angel, Sandy, Peaches, Cameron Cruz, the list goes on. Did I mention Cameron Cruz?
-Affiliated forum for friendly support from sitemasters and fellow users |
| Cons: |
-You may already own some of these DVDs
-The picture quality of the movies isn't bad, but it's not that great either
-Includes some earlier softcore movies
-Updates are sssssllooooowwww - I'm not sure how regular the updates were, but I never saw one during my month's membership; there was a certain movie that always seemed to be 'coming soon' (no pun intended) |
| Bottom Line: |
The Pink Velvet trilogy. Searching For Silvia. Pussy In Paradise. The Return Of Sandy. These are just some of the classic Viv DVDs that I now have on my hard drive thanks to this site.
Nuff said.
You want to know [i]more?[/i] OK! (Damn, that italic thing didn't work)
Well, the picture quality isn't great, but it's very watchable. Better than on the Viv streaming site. And if you're into Viv Thomas's style, then you will probably already own many of these DVDs. And some are rather soft. But not all of them by a long stroke.
So if the thought of having a sizeable collection of award winning Viv Thomas DVDs on your hard drive for posterity (not to mention the odd wank) appeals, then you will certainly benefit from a month's membership at Viv Thomas .com IMO.
Viv re-wrote the book on how quality lesbian porn should be made, and the industry seems to have responded by taking his lead in many areas. He makes sure the girls are really comfortable with each other, and only shoots girls that REALLY get on (off) together, so they perform better, and even have genuine orgasms. Music is kept to a minimum, production values are high - I just really love his films. He seems to care about his art.
And don't mistake girlie kissing and feeling and sensuality for being 'softcore' - there's plenty of anal dildoing, cunnilingus, analingus, etc here. Viv showed us you can be sensual and erotic, AND very explicit too.
Fans of Sapphic Erotica will love it. |
|
01-03-08 02:35pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
171
|
Lezbo Honeys
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Gorgeous European girls
-Genuine lesbian-niche site - no men at all
-The sex is very natural, relaxed and sensual - and can get very dirty!
-Fine movie production values from 21 Sextury
-Gorgeous zipped picture sets
-Decent sized archive (aprox 75 movies as of now)
-All exclusive content |
| Cons: |
-A small number of the movies has been released previously on DVD
-No HD movies (although the 400x300 movies are still excellent)
-Complete movies are only updated every 10 days |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're forever dreaming of being surrounded by gorgeous and depraved young European lesbians (Caroline Cage, Anetta Keys, Sandy, etc.) engaging in such depraved lesbian acts as analingus, cunnilingus, tribbing, dildo and speculum insertions, and more - then Lezbo Honeys may just be the site for you.
Updates are not as often as some other sites (e.g. Club Sandy, Pix & Videos) but are reliable, giving the viewer about 3 complete movies a month. There's a large enough archive to justify a month's subscription, and then you can judge how long to leave it until returning for updates.
See my review for sister site Dirty 101 also - they're basically like two halves of the same site, each with their own wonderful dirty lesbian exclusive content. There's little not to like.
Is it me, or is it hot in here... |
|
01-01-08 04:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
172
|
Lora Craft
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Lora Craft, Lara Croft, Lara Craft - call her what you like, she's still one helluva sexy, horny babe.
-Full downloadable movies, no DRM
-European style, which means no corny chit-chat, and no distracting music soundtracks
-Zipped pic sets available in two resolution sizes
-Lora clearly enjoys her work, and that makes her movies all the more enjoyable |
| Cons: |
-Small archive, means...
-...poor value for money
-Poor navigation - no links to jump to a specific month or genre
-Barely updated in months, so probably shouldn't really have a renewal option when signing up |
| Bottom Line: |
I like Lora Craft a LOT - I think she has a sexy face, a great body, and she loves lesbian anal sex. That's a girl made in heaven in my book, so it was only right that she should have a site dedicated to her.
Unfortunately, the site seems to have been all but abandoned in the last few months, with no word as to why. And with a tiny archive. I downloaded about all the lesbian and solo stuff on there (and didn't bother with the 'behind the scenes' stuff - (that's a passion killer for me). I have just gone to my Lora Craft site folder on my hard drive and counted the movies. Exactly 40. Now, ten years ago if someone had offered me 40 scenes for just 30 dollars, I would've bitten their hand off. I mean, that's probably 8 or 10 DVDs worth. But by today's web standards, it's just not enough when other sites offer 10 times that amount, for the same price.
So I would definitely say this is one strictly for Lora Craft completionists only. Oh OK, and Lara Croft completionists. Oh, and Lara Craft completionists. Did I leave anyone out? |
|
01-02-08 01:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
173
|
Lucky Lesbians
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-As it says on the tin - lesbian content
-Bonus sites
-No DRM |
| Cons: |
-Claims to be Hi-Def, but in fact, the quality is pretty average. They have been re-sampled up to 1280x720 to make HD-sized files, which puts pressure on the processor, but have clearly come from a lower res source and are not sharp, and do not have natural or vibrant colour. Bit of a con really.
-Movies have a horrible great logo spanning the full left-to-right across the bottom of the screen
-As of November 07, less than 20 full lesbo movies (each split into 2 halves)
-Bonus sites not very good. Includes 'Slutty Squirters' which is basically girls screaming their heads off while taking a piss, pretending they're cumming. Yeah right. And 'Anal Hell' - girls sticking a dildo up their assholes for 20 minutes - and pretending they're cumming.
-Annoying music in most of the movies
-Rubbish camera work and lighting
-Average pic sets - not very interesting, and 682x1024 so not very sharp either |
| Bottom Line: |
I really wasn't at all impressed with this site. The tour pages make it look so great, with shots of gorgeous girls in apparently Hi-Def lesbian movies.
Don't believe it. The movies are not that sharp at all. They're easily DVD-quality (the lower end of DVD quality) but no way are they HD. But they've been up-sampled into HD formats, so they have large files and put an HD-type strain on your PC's processor without the benefit of true HD images. I have similar length movies of less than half the file size of these, that look twice as good in terms of picture quality.
And the action is completely fake and routine looking. The girls are just doing their job for the pay cheque, getting out the dildos and screaming their way through 20-30 minutes of porn-by-numbers. I think they'd be much happier working down the supermarket than doing this, by the looks of some of them. They're clearly not passionate about doing this. Or maybe they're suffering from bad direction.
I'm glad I kept the movies and pics on my hard drive so I could review them for this review. But I will be deleting them shortly.
There are far better sites out there than this for your money, that don't waste your disk space with 'pseudo-HD' movies.
Not recommended. |
|
03-08-08 10:33am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
174
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Interesting. In a way - looking at it from a business point of view - you can't blame sites for doing that. They've realised that there's a lot of business in the 'one month only' customers who never return. So it's probably cheaper to just recycle and rely on those one-monther customers coming along.
What large sites should do is offer a choice of deals. The more you pay, the further back into the archive you can access. Different passwords could give different levels of access. That way, if you want to join again after being away for, say, 8 weeks, you could buy an 8 week deal - just get the last 8 weeks of archive - and the next 30 days of updates. This would be better value for the customer because he only needs the last 2 months updates. But for the webmaster it would mean he might come back more often, so it's good business sense. Large sites could offer 4 week, 8 week, 16 week, 6 month, 12 months, whatever deals, up to the entire history of the archive at the top price.
Wonder if any site has considered this? I've been away from Club Sandy for about 3 months - I'd love to visit again, but I don't want to pay full price just to get the last 3 months of updates. I'll probably wait at least a year, and shop elsewhere in the meantime.
|
01-21-08 02:22pm
|
Reply
175
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
But I don't even want it, Drooler! It hasn't been updated since December, and I have really lost all interest in the site. If it were Club Sandy, or Sapphic Erotica, or a great lesbian site then that would be another matter - and I certainly wouldn't shout about it round here *wink*!
One advantage of the free membership is, I can keep checking back for updates, and keep Porn Users informed as to when it bothers to update.
Keep watching my Eve Angel review for updates!
|
01-20-08 04:08am
|
|
