All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I know, my friend. Actually, at this time (or at least last week when I left) Mya's was fully up to date. But Eve's and Lora's are appalling. At least Eve's seems to update *eventually* and backdate the uploads for the missing period.
Not sure if the Club Sandy vid is better quality or not - I didn't bother to re-download it. I doubt it though. Both sites seem to have identical movie quality (i.e. about average).
I'm about to write a review of Eve's site. You know, I actually left a couple of months ago after one month's membership, and got my email confirming I had left and would not be re-billed - and yet I still have full access! I only discovered this when I got an email from customer service saying someone had breached my login details, and sent me a new password!
I replied straight back to say I had cancelled my membership, so it should not be active - but got no reply. So I sent a second email. Still no reply, and the membership is still active! This would be a great thing, if it weren't for the fact that the site hardly updates anyway, and when it does it always seems to be yet another Eve solo set, which never seem as good as Eve's movies on other sites. So it just shows you how bad it is when ex-members don't even want it for free!
|
01-20-08 03:48am
|
Review
177
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
-Beautiful European babes
-Reasonably sized archive is good value when purchased with Porn Users discount
-Whilst not hi-res, the movies are still acceptable quality, and very well shot
-Zipped pic sets available in 2 resolution sizes
-Excellent 'Pix & Videos' style site, with great navigation via calendar, model search or genre search
-Full site browsing access prior to membership
-Large proportion of Mya solo material |
Cons: |
-Movies all appear to have been split into small sections, then glued back together again for this site - they fade out and back in every 2 minutes or so, which can be distracting
-Lesbian archive is not as big as it seems on casual inspection - 95% of lesbian movies are featured on the site in two halves, on two separate calendar days
-Not 100% exclusive. There's a movie I recognised from Club Sandy, and others have commented on other non-exclusive material here
-Large proportion of Mya solo material |
Bottom Line: |
My first thought upon seeing this site was "Cripes, I didn't know Joan Rivers did porno - and what a body she's been hiding all these years!". On closer inspection I realised this was look-alike Mya Diamond. And whilst her facial features are not entirely to my tastes, browsing the calendar prior to joining the site showed me the nice array of friends featured here, which convinced me - at the Porn Users discount price - to take the plunge.
Using the brilliant navigation and aided by a download manager, I was able to firstly target all the lesbian content - 18 movies in all by the time I left last week - as well as an assortment of solo genres I enjoy (mainly ass-related).
There is, naturally, a large proportion of Mya solo material here. She also features in 12 of the 18 lesbian movies I downloaded during my membership. As with Eve Angel's site, focusing so much on one girl does have the potential to get boring quickly unless you really do have a particular insatiable lust for that girl - but this is the whole (or at least the main) point of these sites - to focus heavily on one star girl, and in that regard this site fits the bill.
There does seem to be an issue of less-than 100% exclusivity. I personally only found one movie/pic set that I had previously seen (on Club Sandy), but even so, there is no excuse for recycling, given the money these sites make.
Not worth full price - but undoubtedly fine value at the PU discount, for a month. |
|
01-20-08 03:27am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
178
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Re Mya Diamond.com. Yeah, I have just come across (no pun intended) a vid and pic set of Mya and Sandy, which I had already got from Club Sandy. So this is clearly not a 100% exclusive site.
So far it seems to be updating on time - unlike Eve Angel's or Lora Craft's sites, which nowadays seem to update when they feel like it, if at all.
|
01-20-08 02:51am
|
Reply
179
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Glad I saw this review and replies. I was considering joining Mya's site having been a member of Eve's and Sandy's. But I think I'd better pass on that!
Kind regards
Davit
|
01-03-08 01:59pm
|
Reply
180
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
visor's Reply
Agree with everything you said except more m/f, but that's personal taste for you! :)
|
03-12-08 05:16pm
|
Reply
181
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well, Drooler old boy, you know what they say: 'Great minds' and all that!
|
03-08-08 02:52pm
|
Review
182
|
Only Cuties
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
-Gorgeous young girls
-Lots of 2-girl and solo girl action
-B-G as well, for those that like that
-Nice big archive
-Very reasonable resolution movies (widescreen 852x480, smallscreen 640x480)
-Zipped picture sets
-Daily whole-movie or pic updates
-Excellent navigation - select all the genres you want from a list, then hit 'search'! |
Cons: |
-Too many boring movies - acted out in a 'porn by numbers' way
-Pic sets uninspired - often just the same old standard poses with dildos
-Way too much use of dildos generally |
Bottom Line: |
You know when you get a hot girl back to your place, and she has all the right ingredients - but then in the sack she's uninspiring, unadventurous, and makes you look forward to the post-coital cigarette?
Well, for me, that's how Only Cuties makes me feel. A site like this really should be awesome with what it has; nubile young firm-breasted cuties showing off their talents, with each other, alone, or with a guy.
Problem is, for many of them, their talents are not all that impressive. Don't get me wrong; it ticks most of the boxes - tongue kissing, oral, masturbation with dildos (too much dildo action for my tastes), fisting, anal - more anal would be nice - but in the main this site has the ingredients.
But it just doesn't always do this with enough *heat* or believable passion. It looks, for too many of the girls, like a job to do, rather than an experience to be savoured. Too many of the movies end with the girls lying side by side, not looking at each other, dildoing their respective pussies, as if alone.
There are exceptions, but those exceptions should be the rule.
As far as the all-girl and solo material here is concerned: if you've seen some of the best sites of these genres by now, you may find this site does it a little less well.
On the other hand, if you are quite new to internet porn, and want to experience a site to open the door to multiple hours of sexy naked girls spreading their legs for the camera, then there are worse places to start than here. |
|
03-07-08 03:45pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
183
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Reply
Ohhhh sorry! I get it now - sorry, was being a bit remedial there! Yeah, given the number of dollars to the pound right now, always good to buy American if possible! :)
|
03-03-08 01:20pm
|
Reply
184
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I agree with your comment, Elephant. I joined OC a couple of weeks ago, and it really can't compare with Sapphic Erotica can it? The performances are much more run-of-the-mill, as you say. I lost count of the number of times a video features a girl faking multiple orgasms from another girl just sticking her forefinger up her pussy for 15 minutes. Just dull. Very little full on hot cunnilingus and analingus. Too much boring dildo action.
|
02-26-08 12:15pm
|
Reply
185
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Yeah - thanks for your suggestions, I appreciate your time, RB. :)
I have since left another comment, saying that I found a solution, and am now using DTA - although not in the way I was used to. Right-clicking doesn't get you the file by any method at all (DM or otherwise). But LEFT-clicking does. Still doesn't help with FDM, but DTA does happily offer a way.
Cheers.
Davit.
|
02-20-08 03:47pm
|
Reply
186
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Actually, I have just discovered to my delight that DTA does work. When you LEFT click, a Windows box comes up asking if you want to play the file or download to disk...and another option for downloading with DTA!
Don't know why FDM (my preferred DM) is not on the list, but who cares, I now have DM support!
Thanks for your comment.
Regards
Davit
|
02-20-08 01:42pm
|
Reply
187
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Reply
Where sites allow it, DMs are fantastic. Instead of just right-clicking a link and downloading immediately, you right-click it and load the link into your DM. You can fill your DM up with loads of download links (hundreds if you like!) then you can set it to work downloading all the files for you as you sleep! You also specify where you want to download the file to (which location on your hard drive) and can re-name the files in advance too. FDM is brilliant, I love it, highly recommended, won awards. But so far, no DM has worked for me with Only Cuties.
|
02-20-08 01:34pm
|
Reply
188
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
But have you tried it with this site, Robare?
|
02-20-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
189
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Down Them All does not work. Tried it after Free Download Manager didn't work. Problem is, right-clicking a link doesn't take you to the file. It brings up a file called 'download_video.php'. You have to left click it and then only using the Windows pop-up will give you the file, not FDM or DTA.
Whenever I use a download manager, it just beings up the file called download_video.php (which downloads in about a nanosecond).
Same happens with Dorothy Black's site, but customer support responded to a comment I left on PU, saying they were going to bring in DM support soon.
Are you saying there is actually a DM that definitely works for this site that you have had success with?
Thanks in advance.
|
02-20-08 01:21pm
|
Comment
190
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
|
02-19-08 04:23pm
Replies (11)
|
Reply
191
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
Just a small point: the British pound has nothing to do with the Euro!
|
02-18-08 03:43pm
|
Reply
192
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
Hello again One Man
Just to reply to your comment on using East Europeans etc.
I do appreciate your concern from a moral point of view - i.e. using Eastern Europeans for 'cheap labour'.
But I respectfully disagree. I disagree because sure, it's cheaper from our economy's point of view - but to them they are probably earning a very decent living. This is where market forces actually work in favour of the poorer countries, as they can be more competitive (i.e. work for lower wages than us in the West) and therefore secure work that would otherwise just remain in the UK or USA or wherever.
It's no different to companies outsourcing call centres abroad (I work in a UK call centre, but my employer also uses an Indian call centre for the less technical customer support). And why does my employer use an Indian call centre? Because they're dirt cheap - but they still get the going rate for over there - which affords them a very nice lifestyle. The wages are less - but so is the cost of living within that economy. And that is their 'ace card' in the world market place!
OK, I'm ranting! Just basically saying you shouldn't feel bad about it IMO. Regards. Davit.
|
01-05-08 11:47am
|
Reply
193
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Agreed about Club Sandy. But Pix And Video, whilst having excellently produced movies and tons of content just like CS, does have lower resolution than any other 21 Sextury site I've visited (e.g. Dirty 101, Lezbo Honeys, etc.). I'm not sure where the duplicate movies appear first - Pix & Vids or other 21 Sextury sites - but all the ones I saw were lower res on P&V.
Still, these are still in a small minority, so I don't see it as a major issue - just a disappointment as there should be no need for this at all.
|
01-21-08 02:09pm
|
Review
194
|
Pix and Video
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
-Gorgeous European babes in solo, lez, b/g action
-Large archive
-Regular updates - 1 movie + 1 pic set everyday
-Easy navigation via calendar and model search
-No DRM
-Allows download manager |
Cons: |
-much of the content is not exclusive, and appears on other 21 Sextury sites in higher res than here
-movies are in poor resolution by today's standards |
Bottom Line: |
This site is certainly well worth a visit for a month, and there is some wonderful material here.
I couldn't put my score in the 90s though - that would suggest near-perfect, and this site is still short of that.
Firstly, if you have ever taken out the 'Porn Pass For All' option on 21 Sextury sites (membership to several select sites in a single subscription), you will recognise many of the movies here from those sites - only in lower resolution here. Which brings me to my next small gripe.
The movie quality is generally quite poor. I actually usually quite like the resolution on most 21 Sextury (and affiliated or similar) sites, like Club Sandy or Eve Angel or Dirty 101. They're not the greatest resolution, but they're still sufficient, and the content and production quality usually more than makes up for it. But Pix And Video seems to have even lower res. Having said that, the action is still such that there is much to prefer in these movies to many so-called 'HD' ones.
This is still a well above-average site. I joined for the lesbian and solo content alone, which is as red hot as you will see anywhere. If you like b/g stuff too (which I personally don't) - or if you've not been a member of too many 21 Sextury sites before (which I personally have!) - then this will be even better value for you. Either way, worth its fee for one month. |
|
01-19-08 06:23pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
195
|
Pussy Chompers
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
-Downloadable full movies
-Zipped picture sets
-No DRM
-Lots of bonus sites, a couple of these are really good
-It is very cheap (which has gone a long way to affect the score) |
Cons: |
-Movies are generally old VHS or DVD releases
-Movie quality is inconsistent - some movies are really poor both in picture quality, and in content
-Some movies have no natural sound - just loud music
-Still pictures are quite low res
-Tour pages are very misleading on the content, and present the material as being better quality than it is |
Bottom Line: |
If you want a premium lesbian niche site, you ain't gonna find it here. But then again, if you want premium site, you're going to be willing to pay more than this site's fee, which is a very reasonable 9.99 a month. So, was the fee worth the risk?
Firstly on the main point of this site: the lesbian movies. They're generally quite old (I recognise certain models from five or ten years ago, and I even recognise the odd scene from VHS movies I've had in the past). The resolution of the movies is generally poor also - it often appears like watching VHS on your PC monitor. Likewise, the still pictures are small and low resolution. This is NOTHING like the tour pages show, so don't be fooled.
Here's where things start to improve. The bonus sites! There are some fabulous solo girl sites on offer here, featuring gorgeous European girls masturbating vaginally and anally. There's Solo Stunners, Honey Chest and Busty Cafe. The movie quality, though not great, is very reasonable and the movies are all very well shot with good lighting. Many of the movies are encoded with the wrong aspect ratio, but this is resolved easily enough by manually setting the correct ratio on your player to 4:3.
Would I recommend this site? To lesbian fans: no, but for the bonus solo girl content yes, which I was really impressed with at the price. There are also two boy-girl bonus sites, and a softish bikini site. Worth the fee for these, but then again: I joined for the lesbian stuff... |
|
01-03-08 04:36am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
196
|
Sandra Shine Live
(0)
|
|
05-25-08 11:15am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
197
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Hi Elephant, just seen your comment, been away for a while (using a girl on girl torrent site!)
Yeah, I completely agree. There's something cold and soulless about using dildos. It's so much hotter to see flesh on flesh. S.E. went through a crap period where the girls just weren't up to standard, but now there are loads of fantastic threesomes and foursomes starring Eufrat (for example) with lots of anilingus, and some tribbing too. The occasional turkey still gets through, but there's definitely enough A-One stuff to justify getting your annual update. :)
|
07-12-08 02:26am
|
Reply
198
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
tintintin's Review
Well, I joined again, and can say hand on heart, this review is really not reflective of the site as it is now.
It's not right about there not being much anilingus available. There's shit loads of the stuff! Check out just about anything starring Eufrat (known as Juliet at SE) and you're in asshole heaven!
I do agree about the 3-some comment to a degree.
4-somes are even worse - too often it's just 2 separate couples on a sofa or bed, who then swap partners at half time, rather than 3 girls all giving the 4th one a real lesbian service.
But all in all, I think after a bad period where the movies were becoming dull and routine, the site is now back on track. I just joined after being away for 6 months, and was delighted with the return to high quality lesbian lovemaking to be watched.
Really deserves at least 90, not the poor score given here. (IMO).
|
05-03-08 05:28pm
|
Reply
199
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
tintintin's Review
Have to echo some earlier replies. I certainly have no wish for the girls to 'act a little bit', I hate 'acting' in porn. If I wanna see crap acting, I'll watch American porn ("Just like that, right there", ad nauseum), or an episode of 'Neighbours'.
As I said in my own review, I do think the more recent stuff is sorely lacking, compared to the earlier stuff (or at least that was the case last time I was a member, about 6 months ago). But there is still a shed load of material on this site that features genuine female-loving girls. These girls give performances that simply cannot be faked or 'acted'.
Unfortunately, there is a quantity of crap on this site now that you have to rake through to get to the good stuff. Make sure you don't 'mis' it.
|
04-18-08 11:42am
|
Reply
200
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
Have to agree about SE getting worse in recent months. Whilst the technical quality (resolution, picture quality) is better than the vast majority of sites out there (even better than many so-called HD sites), the content has become dull. I think the webmaster has taken his eye off the ball for a while.
Still, it's worth a month's fee to get all the archive, which is still mostly brilliant stuff, very reminiscent of what we see from Viv Thomas.
|
01-19-08 05:44pm
|
|