| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Fling.com
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
What a joke! I'm not even sure where to start! They shouldn't have the right to call them self an adult site for many reasons. i had almost been there for a week when i got an email for them rejecting a picture of my penis, i was told more than one story of why it was rejected. First it was well you can have it but it can't be 50% of the picture, then i was told you can have it but it can't be hard, well which is it? and if it's an Adult site as you claim why would it matter either way? As i contiued to investigate i came to the conclusion that there does and don't only pretain to MEN. You have women on there showing what ever anyway you can think and they have no problem with that! I saw women with cum in there mouth, dripping down there mouth, penises in there mouth and every where else, but that's fine, i have women in my black book where 50% if not all of the picture is either tits or ass, but that is fine. Seems to be the only problem is if a man post a picture of a erect penis, not sure how that applies to a woman as of yet? I'm not sure how many men work there but everyone i spoke to was a women including the supervisor, who couldn't answer one question i had, just if i don't like it leave! I asked why did the rules only seem to deny men she said can a women get hard? my thing was once a man pulls his pants down your picture will be rejected we don't have tits so what else can i show? and why on earth would a woman what to only see a penis if it's not erect? And the women they are protecting are only there well over 50% of them are only there to steal there customers and drag them to there own personal site, as the someone already said if you get an email back it's likely to be a girl asking you to join them in there private room. It's not an adult site and it's not for men! AssHoles
|
02-16-08 04:53am
|
|
