Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
Cum Brushers
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
"For example, if you look at the listing page for "Incredible Pass" I think you'll understand better why this company is one we do not do business with at this time."
To say the least!
On a side note, I clicked the link to Incredible Pass and was taken to a page that said this, "Forbidden You don't have permission to access /review/incrediblepass/ on this server." I can get to that page using normal means, but that one link did not work for me several times.
|
08-11-09 06:15pm
|
Reply
502
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Curvy Kitty's Reply
I think you missed many of my points. I was not saying 100s of reviews, I as referring to reviews with scores of 100 or close too.
Everyone says they have "high res" photos and HD video but many people do not. You say that you have been around PU for a while, you should have noticed that many of us want the actual specs. Physical resolution, bit rate, photo dimensions and so on. That is what I am looking for.
HD in the past six months is well behind par. HD has been affordable for years now. You are going to get no sympathy there. No HD five years ago is to be expected. I would not expect an amateur site to front $100,000 for an HD camera that many computers would not be able to play. Not asking to be ahead of the curve, but certainly keep up with them.
Limited trials are limited robbery. Those are 99% of the time a rip off.
Something you need to consider is that when reviewing a site you compare it to similar sites for content alone. I would not go to your site and then complain that you do not fit into a size 2 dress. That simply would not make sense. Comparing content niche to niche is good. I think you understand that part. The other part is the more of the technical aspects. Video size and quality, photo sized and quality, navigation and on and on and on are comparable globally. Your product must look as good as the best otherwise it is not the best. Score of 100 indicate a site that is the best on the net, not just a single niche. Others have more content, Videobox, many have better HD, you may very well have the best niche content but that does not account for the other aspects.
"The member that posted, I will be honest is quite well a friend and perhaps was not fair for him to post." That was my initial point and is what I wanted to hear.
|
04-02-11 04:47pm
|
Reply
503
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Curvy Kitty's Reply
Well, I have been in the porn world for a good while as well and I had not known of your site. That in itself does not speak well for your exposure.
Frequently when someone is a member of a site for several years they do not get around the porn world much and do not have much to compare to. Reviews from fanatics do not do people much good. Only one of the reviews you have comes from a known member here at PU. All the rest come from people with a single review, yours. We have seen previously when a series of unknowns submits 100's and similar score and it turns out to be shilling.
It would not be a stretch to conclude, or at lest speculate, that you asked these people to write reviews for you. We a webmaster is in contact with their members it is very easy to get to that. That makes for bias reviews because they do no want to disappoint you.
The flip side of that is that you do have contact with members which is a good thing. Having not been to your site I can not say if it is good or not.
On that note, I will not join your site because there are no trust worthy reviews, my opinion, and I feel that you are trying to manipulate the system here. We have no information about your site, types of videos, media specs, cancellation policies, or any of the important stuff many of us here look for.
In reading other comments you have wrote to other members I have noticed you try to sneak out of people compared to other sites. You ask not to be compared to professional sites, skinny site, granny sites, and so on. The simple fact of the matter is that my money is equal no matter which site I subscribe to. You ask us to ignore obviously superior sites.
Being a solo site we would not expect for you to have as much content as the huge network site. Sites do get held to different standards based off of what they are, particularly when it comes to archive size and update size. What no one mentions is the physical quality of your videos and pictures. I would expect a 100 site to produce full HD no matter the niche, as an example.
Bottom line is I do not trust you or those who have reviewed your site.
|
04-01-11 07:52pm
|
Reply
504
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
turbo3052002's Review
If I didn't know better I would say that this is the beginning of a rerun. I am sure the PU staff will be watching this one as we have all seen the many 100s on an otherwise unheard of site.
|
03-30-11 06:08pm
|
Reply
505
|
Czech Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
marco2006's Comment
You rated this site as a 50, which of course means it is total utter garbage. When a site is "average" it usually calls for an average score. So if you had rated it between 60 and 75 it might mean something.
You really need to offer justification when you say a site is to be avoided or if a site is a must have. 4 words hardly informs people what the issues are. You need to elaborate on this.
|
02-25-09 05:01pm
|
Reply
506
|
Dancerbating
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
"As this time we are video only :)"
"The site is fairly new about a month ish
Right now with launch there are 53 videos with a new video added every 3rd day
They are in WMV HD format 6000 bitrate resolution of 1280x720
The videos range from 3 1/2 to 5 minutes the length of the songs they are dancing to
keep in mind they are very amaturish, almost GF/or Self Shot style. Thats kinda of our style, we like real and nateral
So I hope this helps you"
Straight from the webmaster mouth (keyboard).
|
10-30-09 04:05am
|
Reply
507
|
Dancerbating
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
I just sent an email to the webmaster of this site. Hopefully I get a response. I also told the webmaster about this site. So I am hoping either they email me with all the information about pictures and videos or simply posts the information here.
I actually looked at this site the other night because I am trying to find a good striptease/dance site. Funny how perverted minds think alike. :)
|
10-26-09 08:57pm
|
Reply
508
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
obsessedoverit's Reply
I use the exact same downloader, even the same version. I do not mind so much having to open the gallery for the zips. Granted it is nice to have them all on one page. There is always ways around this though.
|
10-26-08 05:51pm
|
Reply
509
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
I see. I have noticed many websites sites. Basically meaning only downloading while around the computer. A shame really.
|
10-25-08 11:15pm
|
Reply
510
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
obsessedoverit's Review
I have been considering this site lately. Can you describe the issues you have encountered with downloading? Downloading is an important aspect of a site to me.
|
10-25-08 08:08pm
|
Reply
511
|
Daring Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
One of the better reviews I have seen as of late. It really reminds me of my format, so I must obviously approve!
|
05-13-12 04:26pm
|
Reply
512
|
Dawn's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
Easy's Reply
East there Easy. I was simply asking you, not accusing you. I am just trying to gather as much information as I can. The site looks like it would be decent but I am not 100 comfortable shelling out $30 for a site I know uses DRM. How long ago were you a member? Since there is no review of this site perhaps you should write one and explain how this all works to everyone. :)
|
04-16-08 12:35pm
|
Reply
513
|
Dawn's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
Easy's Reply
Curious, do you work for this site in some way? You seem to be trying very hard to sell me on it.
|
04-15-08 08:17pm
|
Reply
514
|
Dawn's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
Easy's Reply
I am assuming this is fairly exclusive for this site though. The few sites that I have actually joined with DRM have given me a great deal of issues with backing up. An I certainly could not transfer the files to another computer and play them after my membership ended. Hustler even made me reacquire the license every three days I believe no matter what I did. And of course these videos could not be played in a DVD player that could normally play computer videos.
It sounds like this place mights as well not even have DRM in their videos. It makes them sound much more scary than you say they are.
|
04-15-08 06:13pm
|
Reply
515
|
Dawn's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
Easy's Reply
The only why to know if it is the same user would be to log IP addresses. So say next year you move, your address is different and they assume you are someone else.
Perhaps you have a way for them to burn, but try putting it in another computer or a DVD player....it is not going to work too well. Unless of course you know something I dont, please tell me!
|
04-15-08 04:15pm
|
Reply
516
|
Dawn's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
Easy's Reply
That would depend. I use Nero for DVD writing and it will not write DRM material to my knowledge. Other programs can do more with DRM, but any backup would only serve you if you still were an active member of the site that the video was downloaded from.
I seriously doubt they would allow you to reacquire the licenses without repaying. Reason being that they have no way of know if it is the same person or not. They would not know if you got the DVD with their videos on it from a buddy or downloaded through some file sharing network or newsgroup. This is the whole point of having DRM on a site that allows a permanent license. They dont mind if you watch the video forever, but they dont want people who did not pay watching it forever too. So I would not count on that.
The only thing I could think of is if you were to provide them with previous username/password and other personal information so they now it is you.
|
04-08-08 04:44pm
|
Reply
517
|
Dawn's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Yes I did see that. Thank you. Gotta love the drawing...it just paid for most of a 750 GB WD :)
|
04-01-08 10:31am
|
Reply
518
|
Dawn's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I have seen this before actually. They choose how the licensing is set up. Hustler for example set there DRM to retest the license every 3 days, others will set them to a certain date, usually the date you subscription would end, and you would have to reacquire the licenses assuming you were still a member. The goal being that if you dont stay a member you lose the ability to watch the movie..unless you change the system date on your computer. :)
What they are saying is that once you acquire the license for the video, it is yours to keep forever. Their goal would seem to be to prevent file sharing, unfortunately they would also be preventing us from making a back up or putting it on another computer after the membership expired. That sort of DRM is reasonable, but it still can get you later on if your computer crashes, you get a different computer, or want to use a different media player or DVD player.
|
04-01-08 09:40am
|
Reply
519
|
Dawn's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
"Yes we do use DRM, but you will be able to view the files after your
subscription expires.
Dawn Allison"
That is the reply I received a few minutes ago from them. So I guess as long as you dont switch computers you should be okay? Still does not sound overly convincing to me for $30.
|
03-31-08 04:08pm
|
Reply
520
|
Dawn's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
True. I sent them an email, so we will see if they reply to if. I am hoping for no DRM, but I am worried that even if they are not using DRM anymore they may not have removed it from past movies! That would be terrible! Will let you know if they reply.
|
03-31-08 03:06pm
|
Reply
521
|
Dawn's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I wish I had a real answer for you. Looks like a good site, nice model :)
I am not going to join because in the terms and conditions page it still mentions DRM under section 11. I am not going to waste $30 just to confirm this though, after all it is in the terms and I am sure they would remove it otherwise. I know this does not totally answer your question, but I guess it gives a good idea of what to expect the answer to be.
DRM will be the downfall of the online porn industry!
|
03-30-08 07:55pm
|
Reply
522
|
DDF Beauties
(0)
|
Reply of
Balibalo's Comment
That is pretty weak. Their sites are awful expensive to be sneaky posting on other sites.
|
04-22-09 04:53pm
|
Reply
523
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Is there any consideration of doing this on a permanent basis?
I believe it would be something to look into. I purchased the network pass, but I likely would not be a customer if I did not hear about this deal.
When a site offers me more for my money it tends to put a squeeze on your competition's likelihood of getting my money this month. This month you grabbed the competition by the balls and squeezed with both hands in my opinion.
|
08-23-09 02:23am
|
Reply
524
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
wildstar's Comment
What download manager are you using?
It is very important to know what manager you are using because they all work a little different and need different input. Download managers can be used on any site whether the site likes it or not. You just need to know how to use the manager and how to figure out which sites need you to do different things.
Just to jump start this help process I will ask you to check out a few different things.
1. Are you using more than one connection per download? Try using only one.
2. Are you trying to download more than one file at a time. Try only one, and use only one connection.
3. Is it recognizing your password? Try manually setting the password on a download.
4. Can the manager detect the file? Check to be sure something did not happen to stop it from seeing certain file types. Or try manually starting the download.
5. Does the URL rotate? "http://sb68v8ecq6m.sitename" That craze shit in the middle might be changing periodically. A good manager will let you see the URL and allow you to edit it. Simply log into the site again and paste in the new random string.
Those are just a few things that can go wrong with a download manager at any given site. But as I said, a manager can be used for any site, it just might be a little different.
Worst case I am planning on subscribing to that exact thing next week, so I will be able to give exact solutions then. However, for both of our sakes I would like to find a solution right away.
Let us know which manager you are using and try to describe what you are doing and what the site's reaction is. If you are not tech savvy dont worry, we will only laugh at you for 10 minutes. :)
|
08-15-09 11:24pm
|
Reply
525
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Reply
Digital Desire seems to use "mood setting" music that actually is not bad. I usually watch my porn in mute anyway because a lot of music is terribly cheesy and ass holes thinking they are cool and taking in the back ground drives me nuts...not in a good way. Every now and then they say something worth hearing, but usually they are taking a lot away from the quality of their work. It drops it from semi profession down to sub amateur.
I am not sure I like total silence though. I like very soft, unobtrusive music playing in the background.
I will keep this in mind if i update with DDF. I have been meaning to, but I was kinda turned off by the large increase in price recently. I really like the models they have, so I might have to break down and rejoin, but I am putting it off figuring I will get a little more bang for my buck this way.....of course, they might up the price again before I join, then I would really be pissed!
|
12-06-08 08:54pm
|