Hookers, because I am hoping that they know a thing or two about accessing the other vices--save, hopefully, for the cow tipping...
I also figure that all the other vices offer the least amount of return on your money, so chose your investments wisely, and why not chose the oldest job/investment known to humankind? ; - )
I just checked on Explicite's blog and most of it is written in French.
I have heard some eastern Euro girls talk dirty in videos--and it is usually very sexy!--since quite a few of them are bilingual, or trilingual if you count dirty talk as another language... ; - )
And I love how many of the eastern Euro girls seem to so happily do nastier and crazier acts as a natural part of appearing in porn, not the ridiculously over the top, world's-biggest-slut acts that the actresses put on in the U.S. (though those can be fun to watch too!).
Nothing sexier than the nice and innocent girl next door (or overseas) with a filthy imagination!
I'm not gay, so I'm a little fuzzy on this, but why would the UK have the edge in gay porn exactly? Different attitudes than other countries? (Though it does seem like most countries "accept" girl-girl porn with a ton of enthusiasm!)
I swear this was asked in a previous poll or forum, but I don't think that just because the U.S. produces the most porn it also necessarily produces the best. (I bring this up because people seem to frequently talk about the boatload of porn created in the U.S. daily as some sort of measure of what's "best.")
Also, I'm uncomfortable calling it the best when it's still more restricted legally than in other countries. Sorry, but the anti-porn moralists don't help in my opinion. (This is probably where the creatively perverse minds from Germany have America beat.) And lets not forget how much good porn is made with models from other countries.
So I want to say Hungary and Czech for the moment, but I'm not sure...anybody got a better answer? : - )
Graymane, I don't think it's an odd poll question, it's probably just that most of us have moved beyond feeling guilt over the masturbatory abuse/love debate.
Though I don't pretend to understand the first thing about religion, particularly the more, uh, hands off ones--literally in this case--there does seem to be a wide range of believers who think, for religious reasons, that the bodily pleasures are off limits to those who think anything goes.
Some view masturbation as disgraceful, sacrilegious, or as just a plain lack of restraint and willpower over natural urges. Others seem to think if a god made their body, and then gave them the urge to play with it, then they are free to go crazy, and what constitutes "abuse," again referring to masturbation, is pretty far off. Me personally, I'm not too sure about people who refuse to masturbate, because if you can't even enjoy the simple things you're naturally born with, then what can you enjoy? But to each their own...
I guess if your masturbation involves S&M stuff then you're in a whole other ballpark, and then "abuse" would actually mean not getting abusive, but that's a different poll question entirely.
I went to school a little later than most other students, and as such I wasn't about to be bossed around by a bunch of, in my opinion, teenage alcoholics just for the chance that I might get to drink with them.
That and I'm pretty independent most of the time and kinda antisocial in certain situations.
I say yes, because I'd certainly like to think they do! I see plenty of beautiful women everyday--though I don't ask about their masturbation numbers--and frankly I can't think of a more appropriate way they could treat themselves.
If nothing else, I believe women have us guys beat in repeatability. I bet a lot of us can only manage one home run per day...
I've heard of a number of guys who like to keep some in the tank so that afterwards they can flush the pipes, so to speak, normally when they get to a working bathroom of course. And I've even read, as an actual recommendation from doctors, that women should urinate fairly soon after sex as a way to help avoid urinary tract infections. (Depends on the individual woman and her susceptibility to UTIs, and again this is in a toilet, not the bed/couch/backseat of your car!) I guess sex really is dirty...
Here's a quote from the Mayo Clinic's site, so you don't think I'm making this up and then you all vote to have Khan send me off to the crazy house for good! From Mayo Clinic: "Take these steps to reduce your risk of urinary tract infections:[...]Empty your bladder soon after intercourse."
This whole time all these porn girls were just trying to stay healthy, not fulfill some screwball fantasy! (That's my excuse for watching it--health and well-being...)
Pee videos probably have fewer health problems than any comparable anal video, or any hardcore video period (ignoring the mental and psychological issues some viewers seem to believe go along with golden showers). Bottom line, porn talent can get plenty sick without a drop of urine involved, and psychological fuckups can start way earlier too.
I mean when's the last time we ever heard of a urinary tract infection scare from the San Fernando Valley? : - 0
To be perfectly honest, I have never given it much thought, and no I'm not some cold-hearted miscreant who tortures animals or ties up women (plus I'm pretty bad with knots).
I think it's largely a part of the act, and behind the scenes it could all be fine and dandy...but I don't know, and frankly I don't want to know. I don't want to know that some girl has a kid, her marital status, her religion, or that she's really just a doe-eyed innocent who only talks like a drunken sailor on camera.
Call it method acting (though "acting" may be a stretch in this context), a professional demeanor, a naughty side, whatever, but I think it's way too easy to confuse what we see on camera as the whole truth. Yes, there are countless dickheads who have little to no respect for the people on camera, but that doesn't mean every bit of verbal abuse is genuine or even all that unexpected by the respective participants.
Some girls really get into it, frequently making it sound fucking hot, sometimes funny, and occasionally insincere and silly. But come on, it's porn, not a documentary or family movie!
No, neither past or present friends nor past or present girlfriends (granted, not a lot of those to come across).
To be honest I'm kind of glad though. I don't want to watch someone and dwell on what could have been. What would be worse than to watch a former girlfriend perform a hardcore scene that she never would have even agreed to do with you?
Can you blame her? It gets hot there, or maybe those were her work clothes.
I guess the tax rates are a sort of in-the-vicinity-of-porn add-on for living in CA. Nothing in life is free--not even spotting porn stars at your local supermarket (though it probably makes shopping a lot of fun). :-(
But what about the social conservatives you don't know? Didn't Bush II go a lot further than just trying to stop child porn with his Obscenity Prosecution Task Force?
I'd like to think that most anti-porn efforts are superficial--just window dressing to win over self-proclaimed moralist voters--but when they are actually dragging porn producers into court I think there's a problem. I find it ironic that the U.S., with arguably the most legally protected freedoms in the industrialized world, still seems to have a lot of problems with making hardcore porn.
And in terms of the web, since the president supposedly has a "kill switch" to it, will there be limits and laws on who can use what kind of domains? ".mil" and ".gov" are already restricted (though for pretty obvious reasons), would this be extended to our particular pursuit of happiness as well?
Love Firefox on my Mac, as it has all the options in looks, add-ons, and controls that I want/need. I'm generally dissatisfied with Safari, Opera, and Chrome, which all feel like they have too few user controls in the endless pursuit of "simpler is better" (in this case it's not). And IE is almost a joke to me now, though I think you can still download a version for Macs.
Absolutely, as there is no age too young (but still legal!) that has yet to make me feel like a certifiably dirty old man. ;-)
That and of course the various things I really don't have much of a problem with--shaved, waxed, tattooed, and pierced? As long as there are hot women taking their clothes off, I say the more the merrier. (I guess this could all disappear and revert back in a few decades, with me screaming at the younger generations, "Damn you kids, in my day our porn models shaved everything all the time! Now get off my lawn!")
Sorry, but I'm not a member of either of the ALS sites right now. :-(
As I remember this was a pretty limited time offer, and I don't think I could get it once I had cancelled my ALSScan membership even with time left on my subscription. Try asking more current members if they know of this discount or anything similar.
No worries, I didn't even realize I had asked a question! :-)
I sort of knew the answer anyway as I think Alex had mentioned on ALS' blog that they wouldn't allow members to actually choose the models. I think we've also discussed it here in the reviews or in the forum somewhere that ALS doesn't do this, and basically no site lets its members make hiring decisions.
The only "voting" that goes on is in e-mail correspondence, and possibly sites like this as well, where a model is popular enough to come back for a second shoot. Of course, in ALS' case they can all come back!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
