| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
A 100?! For that rating it'd better be all that you say it is and be totally free. ;-)
Good review.
|
07-26-11 11:58pm
|
Reply
227
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Somewhat, I guess because my libido can be stronger than my desire to have sound finances. I guess we've all been there.
: - )
I haven't joined in a while, but I seem to remember ALSScan using its own processor or some exclusive processor, and it's a very popular site here, so clearly it doesn't scare us away. Bottom line, if I really want access to a site, I'll take the risk, it certainly wouldn't be the first time. (I'm also don't have a wife to review the CC bill with, does that make a difference?)
Plus, you can always dispute charges with your card company, probably even more so if its from a website. Though a lengthy history of porn subscriptions you never disputed might not help...
|
07-15-11 08:23pm
|
Reply
228
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I absolutely hate it, and because of this I almost never watch Japanese content...though occasionally I stop and rubberneck at the odd fisting/bukkake/impossible insertion video that their most perverted minds have worked tirelessly to create.
In a way the pixelation almost makes it look like all their porn is hardcore, though I know they're just trying to hide the pee-pee parts. And frankly given some of the stuff they have come up with, seeing people's naughty areas are probably the least disturbing thing to be seen. But when you start pixelating the faces, that's when it feels really weird, like you stumbled onto an illegal video or something! : - 0
Kinda makes me sad really. I think of Japan as a modern, industrialized nation, yet they can't stop pixelating naked people.
|
07-14-11 02:56am
|
Reply
229
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Since I'm part of the Mac cult I prefer MP4, or "Other" I guess, since the fairly common WMV format doesn't convert all at once (you can't skip through longer videos as soon as you open the file, it might take a few minutes).
This is why I prefer sites that offer multiple formats, from SD up to hi-res HD, since so many subscribers are PC users but that Apple users aren't left out. : - |
|
07-09-11 12:59pm
|
Reply
230
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
But I do do a lot of editing on replies and comments.
(Hmm, will this one need editing?)
|
07-07-11 02:55pm
|
Reply
231
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, but usually no more than once, and not really even for typos (which Word usually catches) but for space limits and how it looks on PU.
I haven't done a review in a while, so I'm a little hazy on this one. :-)
|
07-07-11 02:54pm
|
Reply
232
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Like others here, discounts help somewhat, but frankly a site I've never joined before better have a lot more going for it than just a coupon. In fact most 1st time subscriptions I've started are completely independent of discounts--I find a site and eventually (or sometimes immediately...) I join it, and if I like it hopefully I'll get a rejoin discount.
This is true outside of porn too. I don't use a lot of coupons at stores, like when I'm grocery shopping, because they're almost always for shit I don't need/have any interest in. Otherwise I'd have built up a nice strategic reserve of tampons and allergy medications by now. And what the hell would I have ever done with those? Lure single women over to my home: "The party's in here ladies--free Tampax and Claritin for everyone!" (Terrible way to outfit a bachelor pad, if you ask me.) : - 0
|
07-03-11 10:00pm
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
That's pretty much true everywhere. Probably damn near every place on earth needs a sizable dog park nearby because a certain percentage of dog owners are never going to do the cleanup after the dog's done its deed.
When I think about it, I don't know if I really hate dogs so much as their shitty, can't-someone-else-do-it owners. Sorry, but I've never been chased, barked at, bitten, or had to clean a cat's "land mines" out of the yard.
I guess I prefer really independent animals. :-)
|
07-03-11 09:50pm
|
Reply
234
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Cats can also be in danger from people, particularly the ones that hate cats (why you would hate a cat is beyond me). Cats are pretty independent and good at taking care of themselves, but cars, wild animals, kids, and sadistic adults are some serious dangers.
I'm more partial to cats myself, but have yet to live in a home big enough for me to want to own one, since I would have to keep it indoors. Dogs are kind of nice, but I would hate walking them and carrying around their turds for half the walk.
|
07-02-11 01:13pm
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
If you've ever heard of the comedian Louis CK, he has a bit about the difficulties of having a dog and kids at the same time and how eventually the dog is going to die and really upset the kids. He says about bringing home a puppy, something like "Hey look everyone, we're all going to cry in a few years."
It's dark but funny, though dog lovers might not like to hear the whole thing.
|
07-01-11 09:16pm
|
Reply
236
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Be careful, some small dogs are very high energy, maybe they're making up for their small size?
But I guess it ultimately depends on the individual animal--some are laid back and non-confrontational, others act like they just stepped out of Resident Evil (known for having murderous zombie Dobermans in nearly every game!).
|
07-01-11 09:07pm
|
Reply
237
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Generally no, plus knowing that they could kick my ass isn't much of a turn on either, though for others I am sure it is.
A "toned" woman can be attractive, but when it's taken to the "ripped" look of a female bodybuilder, as I think the question is asking, I don't find it very attractive. A healthy woman should have a higher body fat percentage than a healthy man, so looking like a bodybuilder just doesn't do it for me.
|
06-27-11 06:19pm
|
Reply
238
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's basically the only way I've been surfin' at all the last few years, so yes. Plus it's nice to have one less cable in the tangle behind the desk.
I figure if by no other means, porn may eventually hurt me by frying my brain from all the constant wireless surfing and downloading. Hell, for all I know, someone could be downloading their latest fisting-squirting-gangbang video with signals that are shooting through my body right now! I do have a slight headache...
Screw it--give me the porn and the irradiated brain cells!
|
06-25-11 11:04pm
|
Reply
239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nah, my mobile devices are the last things I have yet to corrupt, and I'm trying to keep them innocent... : - )
Plus, what am I going to do--whip out my cell phone if I have some free time on a plane? "Alright, another thirty minutes 'til we land, just enough time to watch a quick fisting video! Hope the mom and her young daughter next to me won't mind."
|
06-11-11 09:53pm
|
Reply
240
|
N/A
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
Great, then every time you walk by an Internet cafe, or just anyplace with WiFi (which includes a lot of businesses), it's going to reek of anal lube, man ass, and whatever body fluids are involved in the videos people are currently watching/smelling. And then Panasonic is going to have redesign their Toughbook laptop to be reek-resistant, and we're all going to be buying wipes for our computers, but not for the screens just to sanitize them.
|
06-10-11 09:03pm
|
Reply
241
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm only slightly interested right now, as I have yet to hear of any 3D technology that is up to snuff for home viewing. This may be a blessing in disguise--what's going to happen to the market when 3D gets so good that viewers start running from the room every time some crazy milk enema scene starts?
Just be thankful we don't have Smell-O-Vision...
|
06-09-11 12:15pm
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If design includes technical issues, then it's very important. Nothing worse than bad/dead links, opening new pages in popups, and just an overall feeling that a site isn't very user friendly. Impress me with being able to get to a lot of content quickly and painlessly, not by throwing gimmicks or Flash animation at me, because nobody really likes a cock tease.
|
06-04-11 08:19am
|
Reply
243
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Plus you don't have to suffer the embarrassment (or make up excuses) of going into your local shop. And then also it's the UPS guy who will be caught driving around with the "evidence," not you. ; - )
|
06-02-11 12:02am
|
Reply
244
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Depends on both the quality and quantity of the work. Oh, and is it by sight or touch? : - )
Big implants with serious, or just recent, scarring are always easier to spot than "one size up" implants with minimal incisions. And I don't think I've ever seen a TUBA scar (Trans-Umbilical Breast Augmentation, or through the bellybutton, if you're curious), though I'm not a literal navel gazer. Watching implant surgery on TV is always horrifying, yet somehow too mesmerizing to ignore...
I think it says something about the performance or performer if I'm too entertained to notice whether she has implants until much later. If it's one of the first things I notice and I can't stop thinking about it, then it will annoy me, but after the fact I could care less.
|
05-25-11 05:25pm
|
Reply
245
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Really depends on my mood--sometimes it enhances the fantasy, other times it detracts. I like a lot of Seymore Butts' videos (vast majority of which is POV), though he tends to be a lot more respectful than other POV stuff out there, as so much seems to be an excuse to have almost no crew and just let the cameraman poke and prod the actress.
Though rare, girl-girl POV can be very entertaining! : - )
|
05-22-11 11:44am
|
Reply
246
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can't believe I'm saying this, but I think a lot of us have become pretty desensitized to it, not to mention what the actresses must be feeling, or more accurately no longer feeling. : - 0
Now that you can find not just whole scenes but entire movies that are nothing but anal--where the pussy seems to be left alone as eye candy--it loses its naughty wow factor (or is that "Ow!" factor?) and becomes boring and passé. Today it almost seems more entertaining when a girl will not do it, and you start watching her just in the hope that she will do, if only once--how screwed up is that?
|
05-18-11 04:44pm
|
Reply
247
|
N/A
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Reply
Probably because (most) guys are not on the receiving end--I doubt that it would be as popular if the situation was reversed!
|
05-18-11 04:31pm
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Maybe in terms of general tastes but not in terms of the ethics of paying for what you want. A ton of people out there seem to believe porn is only for freeloading.
|
05-16-11 08:53am
|
Reply
249
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
TBP has listing pages? ; - )
It's been a loooong time since I checked on there.
|
05-13-11 03:27pm
|
Reply
250
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't think I've ever seen such a thing, but then again I usually know the price before even going to their page--it pays (or saves your pay) to join PU and do your homework! If anything a site should advertise its price--whether as a "good" deal or simply to be honest--if it wants customers to fork over their money.
|
05-11-11 06:27am
|
