| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
I think most porn surfers, in general, have different tastes from what is usually expressed by most PU members. Maybe we are a more particular group, or want something a little less mainstream. Except that in the glamor nude art niche, we seem to be more mainstream in our tastes.
|
05-16-11 02:04am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
It appears that we're a fairly representative group. I'd like to think that we accept the different tastes that others have.
|
05-16-11 03:56am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
turboshaft (0)
|
Maybe in terms of general tastes but not in terms of the ethics of paying for what you want. A ton of people out there seem to believe porn is only for freeloading.
|
05-16-11 08:53am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Capn (0)
|
TBH it is not overly a concern of mine, as mainstream porn is more than catered for.
If someone feels their niche is being neglected, it is up to them to speak up.
Cap'n.
|
05-16-11 09:08am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
There is no "general taste" in porn when so much is available and sexuality is so complex. I applaud the diversity and know that I, a jaded old guy, enjoy many things that don't appeal to everyone because I've seen it all and am bored now with things that really turned me on twenty years ago.
As an individual's sexual tastes evolve, what turns one on changes.
"In olden days a glimpse of stocking was looked on as something shocking...."
Not so turned on by sox anymore, myself, but don't begrudge the foot fetishist his or her fun....
|
05-16-11 12:40pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
I went for maybe a few.
|
05-16-11 03:44pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Would porn surfers in general agree with each other's preferences, were they known? They might generally agree that DRM is objectionable, and perhaps there would be a majority against fake breasts.
Aside from that, I wouldn't know. And, by the way, those are the only two things that I can think of that those vocal at PU agree on.
Jay G said, "There is no 'general taste' in porn." He's probably right.
|
05-16-11 04:34pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
Certainly in one area, I believe that most porn surfers have proven a divergence from the views expressed on this site - and that's large fake boobs, which are mainly dissed on this site and mainly enjoyed in the wider porn-consuming world.
|
05-16-11 06:14pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
pat362 (0)
|
I agree with turbo's statement that it's the part about paying for it that many don't agree with. Which is too bad.
|
05-16-11 06:22pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
slutty (0)
|
I think just a few is probably accurate.
What else would explain the vast amount of shitty gonzo porn that is currently produced if so many hated it? I have to think there must be a reasonably large market for this material, and you don't hear folks around these parts singing its praises...
|
05-16-11 08:50pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
Belthazar (0)
|
Majority of porn surfers could have same tastes as PU members, but do not bother to pay for it :)
|
05-17-11 12:09am
Reply To Message
|
12
|
Monahan (0)
|
REPLY TO #8 - PinkPanther :
I agree.
The only way to gauge what "most porn surfers" like would be to see membership counts AND renewal stats for all sites.
But that ain't gonna happen so the next best approach is to see what sites seem successful and what sites die on the vine.
Another approach is to see what the successful sites are posting. Bogus boobies seem to proliferate on Brazzers, for example, so they must generate enough hits that the ZZ boys continue to produce/buy such content. But methinks that's not as reliable because my two favorite sites, 21Sextury.com and DDFProd.com have very few pneumatic mammaries displayed on their sites.
Bottom line, PornUsers.com is something I would never expect but truly appreciate; a site that covers the porn site business and a membership that is articulate and resourceful. I suspect, however, that a lot of the porn market is made up of pubescent teens who have not yet developed any specific tastes nor would they bother checking out a site like PU, mainly because they're spending their tiume fist fucking over some tattoed babe with the ballooned up funbags.
|
05-17-11 08:07am
Reply To Message
|
13
|
yote78 (0)
|
And just what "preferences" would those be?
I think we're all pretty diverse in our tastes in porn (and many other things, I suspect). That's why I like coming here. It's great to share those diverse preferences and opinions with so many others who share the one common interest--good, clean dirty porn in (most) of its wonderful variations.
|
05-17-11 04:19pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
otoh (0)
|
Although here we have very diverse tastes, I think in general we're not representative - to start with, as some folk have said, most people here agree on disagreeing with many common porn themes such as fake boobs.
But more than that, the fact we are here itself makes the difference; that we are interested in porn, rather than just - just :) - using it for instant gratification. Discussing it intelligently and rationally (and paying for it) puts us in a different demographic from the majority of consumers, so as such our views are likely to be different.
|
05-17-11 11:58pm
Reply To Message
|
15
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
Some do, some don't. I guess for example the two major European networks appeal to large masses as well as us but then I think that generally a PU demands more from his entertainment than an average surfer who's happy with Hustler and Playboy also.
|
05-19-11 09:42pm
Reply To Message
|
