| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
301
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
|
01-30-09 11:26am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
302
|
Club Nikki Nova
(0)
|
|
01-28-09 02:17pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
303
|
Best DVDz
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Sorry, cannot help you with that: bad search engines are a pet peeve of mine and all I did to write my first reply was a quick search at iafd.
Thanks for pointing to the site. Buried within the site, I saw several scenes of personal favorites of mine. It's a pity you have to rely on a free resource like iafd to get the most of sites you are paying for.
|
01-24-09 10:22am
|
Reply
304
|
Best DVDz
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Looks like most DVDs are from the Caballero studio. At iafd, Racquel Darrian is only listed as having 2 films with this studio. "Andrew Blake's Girls" was released recently and Racquel Darrian should be there (although I'm not sure looking at the screen caps in the free tour). They might release the other movie in the future: "Night Trips 2".
|
01-24-09 09:29am
|
Reply
305
|
Summer Banks
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
The easiest way to know when a file on a web server was last modified is with a javascript bookmarklet. Search for "javascript lastModified bookmarklet" and you'll find it easily.
It often gets fooled because some servers send the current date but, in cases like this, it's quite handy: I cannot be a 100% sure the site hasn't updated in 6 months without joining it but, since the picture of the last update on the home page was uploaded in June 2008, I draw my own conclusions.
|
01-22-09 10:58am
|
Reply
306
|
Summer Banks
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Needless to say the date in a huge font at the home page is not the date of the last update but today's one.
Looking at the web server headers, the update at the top goes back at least to June 2008. The site most likely hasn't updated in the last 6 months.
|
01-21-09 02:31pm
|
Reply
307
|
Muffia
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Unless you're a big fan of a particular site of Muffia, Reality Kings without a doubt. Almost 30 sites and archives going back to 2001. Various Reality Kings sites have twice as much content as this network as a whole. You may even get a Muffia trial.
Just keep in mind the download limits at Reality Kings and the lack of decent streaming.
|
01-13-09 03:19pm
|
Review
308
|
Muffia
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-New network by Reality Kings. Interface, site design is very similar.
-Currently, 7 sites. Around 120 scenes. Last addition: Naked Movie.
-Did not notice any download limit (got 50 full scenes in 3 days).
-Preview options: trailer and full-episode flash streaming.
-Nice flash streaming option (not available at Reality Kings).
-Content: "sex life" (Molly's Life, Kristin's Life, My Sexy Life), Vignettes (Cum Fu, Footville, It's Real), movie parodies (Naked Movie).
-Video options: full movie (720x480 1400kbps), split in 4 parts and MP4/iPod format (not for Cum Fu).
-Videos are 40 minutes long on average (Naked Movie and "sex life" can go over 60, vignettes around 30).
-Images are 900x600. Zip files. Around 400 pictures per set.
-Good network navigation plus breadcrumbs within updates.
-Users may tag scenes and photos with keywords (keyword set is limited).
-5 updates per week (It's Real updates monthly, rest were updating weekly).
-Full trial when joining Reality Kings. |
| Cons: |
-Requires a separate membership from Reality Kings.
-New network. Still few updates and sites.
-Metadata isn't always accurate: missing descriptions, repeated or missing performer names.
-Performers cannot be listed alphabetically, only by release date.
-Flash player could be even better: hard to manage the thumbnail scrolling; became unresponsive some times.
-Ads on every page: integrated into site (only image, but marked as advertisement).
-Half of the sites have nothing but screen captures for pictures.
-I had the feeling downloads were slow. I'm downloading much faster from Reality Kings. Trial related?
-Got a great price deal but had to go through an unknown payment processor. |
| Bottom Line: |
On a technology level, the main difference between Muffia and Reality Kings is the addition of a Flash player for all scenes. I didn't start with Reality Kings until my Muffia membership expired and I just can't stand that buggy WMV streaming anymore. I got used to the full scene streaming they offer here and it was perfect to easily find the scenes that were worth downloading. Hope they get the streaming there soon. I didn't come across any 15 full episode download limit like they have at Reality Kings but I downloaded only slightly more per day and I did notice things were coming down slower. Just a feeling, though.
Does this network offer something original? Molly's Life is a spin-off of We Live Together (Molly still appears there every couple weeks) and Kristin's Life is a spin-off from Milf Next Door (Kristen Cameron has 86 scenes there). Didn't check both sites thoroughly but it doesn't look much different from what is already available at Reality Kings. My Sexy Life follows Phoenix Marie around while she has sex with many well known US porn stars. I'd certainly recommend this network to fans of any of these women: you get one new scene of them every week and you'd probably care very little about talking cameramen/camerawomen, abuse of POV and endless introductions as long as your favorite star is there. The remaining sites are very niche sites: "Asian" models in various vignette scenes (Cum Fu), a foot fetish site with euro models (Footville), prosthetics (It's Real) and movie spoofs (Naked Movie).
I don't get this new trend among porn networks of releasing a separate second network that requires an additional membership. I'm sure they know what they are doing but it looks weird. Funny thing is Reality Kings has also released new sites within their original network since they launched Muffia (CFNM Secret or Hot Bush, I believe). I got a really cheap 3-day trial when joining Reality Kings for the first time; otherwise, I'd never have joined this site. |
|
01-12-09 02:26pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
309
|
Kelly Divine
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Official website of American porn star Kelly Divine.
-19 videos. 1 resolution per video. 20 minutes on average.
-Resolutions varied: 320x240 400kbps (25%), 512x384 750kbps (50%), 640x480 1000kbps (25%).
-Videos were mostly hardcore boy-girl/boy-girl-girl (75%); girl-girl amounted to 25%.
-Half of the videos were interracial.
-Many pretty well known porn stars (female and male).
-Videos were a low-budget attempt at reality porn.
-8 solo photo galleries not related to the videos. 20 photos per set.
-Forum (crippled by spam) and pretty active blog in the free section. |
| Cons: |
-Bad video quality. Bitrate was too low at all resolutions.
-Photos were too small (546x364).
-Free tour only shows 2 new scenes that weren't available when I was a member.
-No anal that I could see even though Kelly Divine has done it several times.
-Trial membership no longer available.
-Interaction is possible but it's hard to find (no link to blog/forum from members section).
-A bit too simple site design. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is how the site was four months ago. I got a really cheap trial membership back in August but they are no longer offering it. I don't think I'd have joined the site at full price. Fans and completists should probably go for it, though. Additionally to the 19 videos they had in August, the members' area might have more than the couple new scenes I identified in the tour. There's also a promise of webcam shows and she blogged about having done them at least once.
It's a pity they haven't done anything to solve the spam flood in the free forum. I lurked in it for some time and it looked like a great way to interact with the model. For instance, I remember a fan asking Kelly Divine if she'd fuck a guy with a strapon; she answered she wouldn't do it for fear to hurt the guy but, a couple days later, she said a performer had contacted her willing to do a similar scene and she'd be releasing it in the members' area. I don't know for sure whether that scene was released, though. Maybe they've created a members-only forum where the interaction goes on.
As for the content, if it wasn't for its low bitrate, it wouldn't look out of place in a big-boobs reality site. They wouldn't win an Oscar for original script (repairman, pool guy, booty call, ...) but what reality site would? Female cast also included Jennifer Dark, Abbey Brooks, Ricki White or Sinnamon Love; Mark Wood, Reno or Richard Mann among the male performers. Other cast members were unknown to me. I found her scene with Richard Mann to be really good.
One thing I found weird is that the photo content was almost non-existent even though the free tour showed photos of the videos that were clearly not screen captures. I don't understand why those pictures weren't available inside the members' area. |
|
01-11-09 10:15am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
310
|
XOXO Leah
(0)
|
Reply of
Leahs Big Fan's Comment
Thanks for the heads up.
JFYI, a model application thread in her name was started at the Cam With Her forum right before Christmas but she hasn't appeared in the performer list so far. Apart from that post, she didn't say anything more. Those people are serious about fighting fakers so it had to be her who started it.
I found that weird at the time but now I understand. She's pretty hot. Hope she stays in the business somehow, though. Maybe she made it to another cam site.
|
01-10-09 09:38am
|
Reply
311
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
They only get the spotlight for a couple days and then disappear into the Previous Polls section. Maybe, on the home page, there could be a couple links below the latest poll to the two previous ones (title only, no results). This way, discussion could go on.
On the other hand, it's hard to know an archived poll you might be interested in has received further replies unless it was a direct reply to you. Forum automatically bumps topics to top when they get replies but polls are only sortable by creation date, total votes and total replies.
Bottom Line: Archived Polls should be sortable by last reply received and it should be the default option.
|
01-10-09 09:26am
|
Reply
312
|
Cam With Her
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
Thanks for your input. Self control is much needed here. I enjoyed this site but I would never recommend it to anyone with an addictive personality.
As I said in my review, this is the first cam site I've ever bought credits at. The main problem, here and probably in any cam site, is that there's no limit to the amount you can spend in a given time period. Here you can buy up to 100 USD, blow them in 10 minutes and nothing prevents you from buying a 100 USD more half an hour later.
This site offers, though, a simple but very clear account of all your transactions: credits bought and spent. You may even filter by performer and/or date interval. I don't know if other cam sites offer similar information but I found this feature very helpful.
|
01-07-09 03:32pm
|
Comment
313
|
Non-Nude Cams
(0)
|
|
01-06-09 01:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
314
|
Nude Adult Cams
(0)
|
|
01-06-09 01:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
315
|
Cam With Her
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-ccbill for members' area and webcam credits (buying credits is extremely easy).
-Lots of interaction with the models via free forum. Some models average 20 posts per day.
-Free clips section with lots of non-nude teasing clips from the same models.
[Pay-per-minute Webcam Shows]
-Much greater looking models than other networks I've seen.
-Around 80 models. Mostly from US (80%) and Canada (15%).
-Private is non-nude teasing (avg: 4.5 USD/min). VIP is usually topless (avg: 8.5 USD/min).
-Account of credits bought and spent.
-Most regular models do chats at lower prices several times a month.
-Cam to cam available (I didn't try it).
[Members' area]
-Membership gives you 20% discount at live shows.
-Free members-only chats form Sunday to Thursday (about 40 shows a month; 15% of them at Europe-friendly hours).
-Members-only chats are available for replay on the next day (FLV format, 30-60 minutes each).
-Access to forum's advanced functionality (message models, particular models forum, etc) |
| Cons: |
-3 different logins for members area, forum and webcams.
[Pay-per-minute Webcam Shows]
-No preview. Ask model or check the forum (most post daily previews of their outfit there).
-Cannot record the shows.
-Requires a series of steps every time to get the member discount.
-Some chats use Java: I had to install latest version on my computer to avoid crashing Firefox every time.
-Some have particular requirements; for instance, only go topless if you have 50+ credits. Check the forums.
-European perspective: at times, noticeable lag and freezing; few models (5-10) in the evening and almost always the same ones.
-You have to go to Nude Adult Cams at higher prices to get the models a step further.
[Members' area]
-Download limit. 1 Gbyte every 6 hours. Slow download speeds.
-Small image and video resolutions. All the content is non-nude.
-Cumbersome. Exact amount of content is unknown. Members' area v.1 is hard to find (has more content than v.2).
-Regional pricing. Cam credits do not. |
| Bottom Line: |
Separately, they wouldn't amount to much: a somewhat expensive cam network with few but good looking models and a cumbersome non-nude pay site with low resolutions and not that much interesting content except for the daily chats. Glued together through the forum, though, they are a powerful combo. Many of the models are extremely active there and, even though they often get into endless teasing mildly-sexual "post wars" with the same members, it's a great way to know about their personalities. And some of them have quite interesting ones. You also get them to tease you through the members' area content and, if you want some 1-on-1 naughty time and have the credits, they are there for you.
This site has a steep learning curve. For starters, this company has several slightly similar sites and it's easy to get lost in a jungle of acronyms of sites that may or may not have the same models doing more or less than they do here: CWH, NAC (Nude Adult Cams), Pchats, Mchats, NNC (Non-Nude Cams), ... For me, coming from a different culture, a different language, and a different age group (I've got a strong feeling this site is targeted at people in their early 20s) was a real handicap. Also, the difference between the private and VIP chats is common knowledge but I didn't find it written anywhere. To top it all, in order to get the 20% member discount, you have to go through a route similar to that of Indy at the end of "The Last Crusade" or you won't get it at all.
I did several pay-per-minute chats. I was a total newbie but my experience varied from model to model. I guess varying satisfaction is commonplace in all cam networks. Some put up a great show, talking and acknowledging what I was saying. Others, despite their great looks, went through the motions and paid more attention to things in their room than to me.
I wish I knew what prompted me to join this site. Now I know that many of the models are extremely popular on various tube/clip sites but I've never visited those site so I just probably stumbled upon it and some model caught my eye. I was member for a month but canceled my membership a couple days before renewal. The content was almost impossible to download for me and consisted mainly of teasing photo shoots and related videos. The chats were mostly at 3 AM in the night and having the 20% discount was cool but I'd have to spend more than a 100 EUR per month in credits to make it worth. Even though, I cannot promise I will not come back for a 1-on-1 show with certain models from time to time. |
|
01-06-09 01:16pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
316
|
The Real Me
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Emphasis on side aspects of a shoot (although a bit too much so it's also a con).
-Good photography by a team that also works for Twistys or Babelicious.
-Cheap full access trial membership.
-Good site design, easy to navigate.
-Well known US adult models.
-Good way to see the person behind the adult model.
-Every model has 3 videos: teasing/masturbation (depends on model), BTS, interview.
-WMV format, 50% at 640x480 (1500kbps), 50% at 400x300 (1200kbps). 10 minutes long on average.
-Also 3 photo galleries: 1. teasing/masturbation (depends), 2. BTS, 3. candids (real life pictures).
-Picture count: 1. 150 (1200x900), 2. 50 (1200x900) 3. 20 (varies).
-Zip files available (although they also include the thumbnails !?). |
| Cons: |
-Site is no longer updating and is for sale.
-Too few models.
-Too much emphasis on the side aspects of a shoot. A bit of BTS is welcome but so much...
-Interview questions are generic and the same for all models (allegedly submitted by site members).
-Only one "action" set per girl (one photo gallery, one video).
-Too many pictures in the sets are promotional ones (holding signs or on The Real Me outfits).
-"Candids" are a joke: same photos are likely to be found without blurred faces at the models' myspace profiles.
-There's an embedded cam network; you will unintentionally sign up by just clicking on a picture.
-Cam network has no membership fees but periodically spams you with new performers. |
| Bottom Line: |
Since this site is almost certainly defunct, I encourage those curious about it to go for the trial membership and grab the content since it could be taken down at any time. No need to stay further since no updates seem to be coming. If you're really into this type of content, I encourage to try Danni.com's "Up Close & Personal with ..." series with their Danni girl of the month.
The interview part reminds a lot of the ones at Babelicious: most of the questions are repeated and the production team is also the same so it brings a certain sense of déja vu. The BTS follows the model while she's getting ready for the shoot; picking clothes, makeup, etc. Both are interesting and very rarely seen. All models are great looking but getting a glimpse of the personality can make you grow fonder of her; Karlie Montana is perhaps the best example for me. I won't say names, but it can happen the exact opposite: some model may have the looks but her personality sucks.
Regarding the sets, they have a certain flare of Twistys or Babelicious. Softcore models will just tease while hardcore ones will masturbate. The end result is more than OK but it feels short having only one set per model.
For completists, here's the full list of models: Andie Valentino, Carli Banks (2 sets), Erika Jordan, Franchezca Valentina (photos only), Georgia Jones, Jayme Langford, Karlie Montana, Lia 19, Luana Lani, Marlie Moore, Renee Perez, Shay Laren, Tiffany Brookes and Zoe Britton. |
|
01-06-09 10:47am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
317
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks for the info. I see they haven't changed much over the years except for the somewhat higher resolutions. They always have given more importance to quantity over quality. Also, they've been pulling that bigger preview trick from day one. It doesn't make much sense to have so many picture content and that they care so little about it.
|
01-05-09 07:13am
|
Reply
318
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
User's Review
You don't mention anything about the pictures. What resolutions are there? Are they grouped by movie only or also by star?
I was a member several years ago and I remember they had quite extensive galleries for each movie although the resolution was quite small.
|
01-04-09 10:35am
|
Reply
319
|
Sister Reunion
(0)
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Reply
Thanks for the info. This site, though, so far seems more like a mainstream US porn site; I believe most of the models are known to those familiar with US porn: Britney and Whitney Stevens, Ashli Orion, Havana Ginger, the Love twins, Rhylee and Rhyse Richards, ...
I must say, though, that the sister/twin thing isn't really something I'm into; I just came across this site trying to figure out the relationship between Havana and Savana Ginger (they are sisters). Since this site seems to be US based, I was wondering how many sister groups who are already somewhat known and already active were left in US porn so they could make it to this site. Thanks again for your input.
|
01-01-09 07:18am
|
Comment
320
|
Sister Reunion
(0)
|
|
01-01-09 05:19am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
321
|
It's Real
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Follow-up to my previous comment: turns out Savana Ginger is Havana Ginger's real-life sister. No wonder why they look so similar.
|
01-01-09 05:08am
|
Reply
322
|
Club Kayden
(0)
|
Reply of
juanchopancho's Comment
Have you checked the review at another review site listed at the bottom of TBP Site Facts? The screen capture there of inside the members area looks promising indeed; site seems well done and updating regularly.
Even though there seems to be more photo updates than videos, the video previews at the site tour have an amateur flare but they look quite fresh and interesting. I'd probably have joined already if they were somewhat less expensive and used a decent payment processor instead of DHDMedia.
As for Tori Black, I believe she's fairly new to the industry and I doubt she has a site of her own yet.
|
12-30-08 06:01am
|
Comment
323
|
Zeina Heart
(0)
|
|
12-30-08 03:19am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
324
|
It's Real
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
It's not part of the main Reality Kings network but its new sister network Muffia. I got access to Muffia as a cross-sale from Reality Kings.
Scenes usually involve some prosthetics (double-dicked guy, three-titted woman, four-nipple woman, two-vagina girl, extremely hairy bushes, bifid tongue and so on) but there are a couple scenes which are, in fact, real (big real tits, mainly). Except for a couple, models are probably American but unknown to me.
There's a scene with a model with huge areolae. Funny thing is they name the model "Savana Ginger" and she physically reminds quite a bit of "Havana Ginger", a porn star who does have similar huge areolae.
Currently, there are 17 scenes and the schedule says they update once a month.
|
12-28-08 09:17am
|
Reply
325
|
Matrix HD
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Good review. They are great content producers but their websites are subpar. This one is better than Matrix Nudes in some things but worse in others.
Just a very minor correction, though. I believe pictures at this site are offered in 4 sizes: maximum axis is 750, 1024, 1600 or 2000 pixels. Most of them are portrait and you have to click four times on the popup window every time to get to the highest resolution. I don't know if they license their photo content at greater than 2000px resolutions.
|
12-23-08 12:26pm
|
|
