| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
3D Lesbian
(0)
|
Reply of
biker's Reply
I understand your point. I hadn't noticed the price difference and 3D Sex Games probably has the same lesbian content as this so, if you are looking for lesbian content, you wouldn't get there anything more than this one offers.
|
12-15-08 11:08am
|
Reply
327
|
3D Lesbian
(0)
|
Reply of
biker's Review
Good interesting review. Have you tried 3D Sex Games by the same company? I believe 3D Lesbian is just a subset of it. You will probably get more models and locations out of 3D Sex Games (check my review there for stats). Even though 3D Sex Games is geared towards boy-girl, you can use female models only and most likely achieve the exact same scenes as in 3D Lesbian.
Unfortunately, you will probably be unable to transfer any personalization you might have made in 3D Lesbian. I believe you won't be able to run both games at the same time either.
|
12-14-08 02:57am
|
Reply
328
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Cool idea but I think it's pretty unlikely. AFAIK, Babes.tv is 100% exclusive while Babelicious is clearly not. Crisis or not, they still have to pay for the exclusive content.
What's more, as a former member of Babelicious, I received last month a newsletter offering me to join Babelicious and the 8 additional sites that come with it for 9.95 USD and also an offer to join Babes.tv alone (no extra sites) for 19.95 USD.
I must say that while I was a member of Babelicious for a month I downloaded much more content during the cross-sale 3-day trial I got for Babes.tv. At least for me, Babes.tv is way more interesting than Babelicious. If I ever come back to one of them, it will be Babes.tv even though it's more expensive.
|
12-13-08 10:38am
|
Reply
329
|
Sleep Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I was sincerely upset with the theme of the site and that's why I ranked it so low. I also happen to like the "belly-down-flat" position but it doesn't appeal to me at all if the models allegedly stay unconscious throughout the scene. I strongly feel they should add some intro or epilogue to justify it. Otherwise, it's just too creepy.
|
11-22-08 04:34am
|
Reply
330
|
Sex A Mexican
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I remember a similar discussion on Curry Creampie. In fact, several of the scenes, like the Sativa Rose and Keri Sable one, come from a DVD titled "Mexicum" which can be found at DVD sites.
What's even weirder than the performer name change is that you can see Porn.com watermarks on some of the tease thumbnails but this site doesn't seem to be owned by Porn.com.
|
11-15-08 07:46am
|
Reply
331
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
Thanks for pointing out this site. I felt other well known DVD sites were absolute lacklusters in search engine terms.
In case you haven't noticed it, they have added an excerpt of your review on the front page:
"Having tried many of the popular DVD content giants, I can honestly say that American Vice is better than all of them."
- Toadsith - #1 Reviewer at Porn Users
|
11-11-08 12:04pm
|
Comment
332
|
Monica F
(0)
|
|
11-09-08 10:27am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
333
|
I'm Live
(0)
|
|
11-07-08 02:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
334
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Let me friendly disagree on most of the content being years or decades old. There is a fair amount of 90s porn and you aren't getting the scenes the day after the studio releases the original DVD. But, looking at this last week updates alone, I saw more than a handful of DVDs released in 2007-2008 and just a couple of 90s porn. And I wouldn't mind if they had more than the current 15 Jeanna Fine scenes (she's listed in 400+ titles at iafd).
As further proof, if you look at the stars with the most scenes you find mainly still active performers (Trina Micahels, Jenna Haze, Tory Lane, etc). If you go to the bottom of the list, you will find models who started last year with some movies (Missy Stone and Stephanie Cane already have at least 4 each one and they currently have only 20-30 movies at iafd).
The site has flaws (for instance, adding the DVD production date and the name of the male performers to the movies would be a nice touch) and it certainly would be nice if they could add the promo stills companies usually shoot for their movies (Wicked Pictures and Vivid are a couple of examples of companies which I believe that offer a good amount of picture content). But, as it currently is, I believe I'm not the only one who feels it's a dream come true.
|
11-04-08 12:02pm
|
Reply
335
|
Natalie Sparks
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Very good review. Looks like the site delivers and has everything a solo amateur site should offer. The girl has the looks. I'd probably join if she didn't have that huge tattoo on her foot.
On a side note, the site looks plain but, from what I saw in the free section, it makes well thought out use of web standards for presentation. This is rarely seen in porn sites so it speaks good of the people behind it.
|
11-02-08 12:01pm
|
Review
336
|
My Heather VanDeven
(0)
64.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Official Site of Heather Vandeven, Penthouse Pet of the Year 2007.
-30 photosets. 1500x100. 40 pictures per set. 20% landscape. Zip files.
-Photos are mostly solo: mix of glamour, fetish and hardcore (fingers and toys).
-A couple tame girl-girl photo sets.
-17 videos. 640x480 1500kbps. 5-15 minutes long.
-50% of the videos are solo (all Juliland clips).
-50% of the videos are boy-girl hardcore (but NO Heather Vandeven in them).
-Monthly blog. Also available in the free section.
-Site design looks good and is easy to use.
-Inexpensive full access trial membership. Billed by epoch. |
| Cons: |
-All photos come from Penthouse (50%), Juliland (20%) or Ken Marcus (20%).
-3 photo sets might be exclusive but look like they were taken some years ago.
-Only one photo update since it was launched 4 months ago.
-50% of the videos are from Juliland.
-50% of the videos are from movie "Aperture" by Michael Ninn.
-Heather Vandeven acts only as voyeur in most of the "Aperture" scenes.
-No interaction with the model. Monthly blog entry but no way to interact. |
| Bottom Line: |
Despite my low rating, those wanting a sample of Heather Vandeven content shouldn't hesitate about going for it. She can be found at several other sites than those listed here but with this one you get interesting content from 3-4 sources for a low price although you get nothing new and no interaction with the model. Monthly membership is quite cheap but updates don't seem to be coming at any rate so it doesn't offer any more than a mere trial.
They aren't offering anything new or different. 95% of the content comes directly from other sites or movies, each source having its own different style. It's nice that she can get at her solo site the content she shoots for other people but having no exclusive content at all is hard to justify. The content comes from a couple quality sites, though, and the model is gorgeous and knows how to pose so no complaint regarding the quality of what they offer.
Launching a site with few content and not updating it any more is never a good sign but the site was launched less than 4 months ago so maybe things will get better. The most recent content were videos from the "Aperture" movie. There are a few boy-girl scenes but Heather Vandeven acts only as a voyeur and doesn't get into the action. The further she goes is a hardcore lesbian scene with Carli Banks. |
|
10-26-08 01:16pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
337
|
Nicole Graves
(0)
|
|
10-26-08 10:24am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
338
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
10-26-08 05:28am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
339
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Regarding the download issues, I've also had them; probably the same as obsessedoverit. I believe that my problem was that they keep changing the file directory structure of the site: the URL a particular video file has now is not the same it will have in an hour. So, after you've added a bunch of videos to download, that automatic directory script may come into action and you end up with a bunch of file not found errors and half downloaded files. It's really annoying and is one of the reasons I cancelled my membership.
|
10-25-08 11:13pm
|
Reply
340
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wildstar's Comment
They are using regional pricing: different regions get different prices. Many other sites also use it. Some webmasters have replied to questions similar to yours.
There are a couple forum threads on this issue:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=115
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=264
|
10-21-08 09:57pm
|
Reply
341
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
marat93's Comment
I got a trial for Playboy's CyberClub a couple days ago. Got billed by Local Billing and was able to cancel the trial membership online without any problem. I am still on the trial period but I already got a confirmation email for my cancellation.
As this site is listed as a clone of Playboy's CyberClub, maybe you should try joining that site.
|
10-20-08 10:53am
|
Reply
342
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks. I guess I already said it in my review but this is the first Score site I've ever joined but I've added Scoreland to my list of sites to join in the future: it has a nice TBP discount and I believe it's the one with the most content.
|
10-17-08 09:11am
|
Reply
343
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Regarding the broken downloads, I believe I also experienced them: it's because they change the website's subdomain every time you login. So, when you restart your computer, the queued downloads are no longer valid and you have to add them again. The site is not very download-manager-friendly.
You're right regarding the current lack of video content but the site just launched. Looks like they started with lots of photo galleries and no videos and they have been adding videos once per week ever since. I don't think 1 video and 1 photo gallery is such a bad update rate for a solo model site, though.
|
10-15-08 11:42am
|
Reply
344
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Glad you liked the review. To each his own, though. Funny thing is I'm not a big fan of extremely huge boobs either and the usual body type of SCORE models has never done it for me but there was something with Christy Marks that prompted me to join and no complaints. The BGG scene with "major boobage" Janet Jade alone was well worth the price of admission.
|
10-13-08 03:11pm
|
Reply
345
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Watermarks on the pictures I've checked are always on the top right corner. It's the same one they have on the videos. On large pics, the CHRISTY part is about 170x70px and it's an almost solid block because of the typeface; there's a 40px-high part below with "Marks.com" which has a much lighter typeface.
I usually don't mind watermarks but these might be somewhat obtrusive, specially on the portrait pictures : they have a long axis of only 1200px which I hadn't realised when I wrote my review.
As I said, I feel pictures are quite good. They are not taken while filming the video: model is always looking and striking poses at the photo camera.
|
10-13-08 12:00pm
|
Reply
346
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> "Extras section is just a couple of videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova."
I should have said "just TWO videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova and nothing more" : no bonus acess to other sites or other girlfriends sets. I've edited the review to remove any confusion.
Glad that you found my review interesting too.
|
10-13-08 11:15am
|
Reply
347
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
You get the discount but, according to reviews and comments, you will probably also get charged for other sites you didn't sign up for. Many people report having had to cancel their card.
If joining through ccbill does get you access to the site without additional charges, those extra 10$ seem very well worth it.
|
10-12-08 01:41pm
|
Review
348
|
Christy Marks
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Natural 36H model "SCORE Newcomer of the Year 2008" official site.
-Really good website design.
-TBP facts are right except for video maximum resolution.
-1280x720 wmv (2100 kbps), 854x480 wmv, 640x360 wmv / mp4. ipod, psp, windows mobile.
-All formats also available to download in 5-minute segments.
-Flash streaming: high bandwidth, low bandwidth and trailer.
-Scripts and scenarios are usually quite elaborate.
-There's music during videos but model can be heard when she moans or speaks.
-Zip files for small (800x600 H / 400x600 V) and large (1600x1200 H / 800x1200 V) pics.
-50-100 pictures per set.
-Scenes usually shot at a studio but good amount of outdoors.
-Current update rate: 1 new scene per week (video and photos).
-Most content is solo but they have been releasing more boy-girl and girl-girl recently.
-Solo videos usually focus on boob playing (jiggle, lick, squeeze, ...) with some masturbation.
-Model is very flexible which makes for many interesting positions. |
| Cons: |
-You enter CC details at their site and don't know what payment processor will charge you.
-I was billed by a processor I had never heard of.
-There is no link between photos and videos page from same set.
-Large portrait pictures are not 1200x1600 but 800x1200.
-Poor interaction: you only get a weekly blog entry with pictures.
-Must solve a CAPTCHA to login every time.
-Extras section is currently just two videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova and nothing more.
-Long in-depth text interview without video: missed opportunity.
-Website sub-domain name changes periodically: hard to use download managers.
-She sports four weird belly-button piercings in her latest scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like the model's looks and her huge assets, you should not hesitate about joining (as long as you agree to give your CC details to a little known payment processor). For a solo model site, the update rate is more than OK. Video quality is great and they come up with interesting ideas to make the scenes different, even the solo ones.
The current lack of content (site was launched recently) and the little interaction with the model are what refrains me from rating the site higher. There are weekly blog entries with a few pictures but they are a bit of a letdown: the model seems to have an interesting personality but the most remarkable events during last month's entries were that she was sick for a couple weeks and that she played guitar hero and ate popcorn with some friends. I don't know why they didn't tape the long text interview they have posted.
I liked most of the scenes but keep in mind that there's usually a playful attitude that might not be every one's cup of tea. Specially in the solo videos: playing strip space invaders (banging the buttons with her boobs), squeezing lemons between the tits to make lemonade or a bra fitting session are some examples. Scenes always have some kind of script but it can feel somewhat cheesy at times. I'm not familiar with Score Group content but I believe these kind of things aren't that unusual with them.
During the last couple months, they have been releasing a BG or hardcore GG scene every other week with solo scenes in between. Her hardcore performances aren't bad at all and there's always lots of tit fucking, handjobs and positions that showcase her boobs. There's a BBG scene coming next week and there was a BGG tit fucking scene recently where Janet Jade stole the show: what a RACK!, give that girl a site of her own.
Technically, the site is quite spectacular. The plethora of available resolutions is a real treat. Site design is really good and you are even offered two views while browsing the updates list: large thumbnails with scene description or smaller thumbnails with less info but more updates per page. I didn't pay much attention to photos but they seem to be good enough. It was a bit annoying to always get the smaller 800x600 galleries by default.
Needs growth and a bit more of interaction but I feel it's already a very good site. |
|
10-12-08 11:33am
Replies (12)
|
Reply
349
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornluver's Comment
I doubt ccbill would actively participate in the type of double billing these guys are known for. Incredible Pass is able to double bill people because you are sending your credit card data directly to them: notice that the page where you enter CC data is at their site while sites that use ccbill send you to enter CC data at ccbill's domain.
My only concern is whether a membership purchased at ccbill's store is always a valid one. I had never noticed you could buy memberships directly through ccbill's site but I see there's an option to buy access to incrediblepass.com there. I searched for some other sites and the descriptions don't match at all.
So, I don't think you should be concerned with your CC data if you enter it at ccbill; as long the ccbill store is legitimate, you should get access to the site.
|
10-12-08 10:10am
|
Reply
350
|
Mia McKinley
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Another site powered by the same people, Naughty Natalie XOXO, also got a rave review with little info. I wrote a review for another site by them, Miss Laura Lee, whose picture content info shouldn't be much different from the one here.
The free section from these people usually shows the amount of content available in the members area. Be advised, though, that pictures are probably quite small and cannot be downloaded. Video sizes are probably big but there's no info on resolution or duration. Only a handful of videos. There's a free video sample which is 1280x720 (6000kbps); IMHO, very bad camera work, though.
|
10-12-08 05:35am
|
