| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Short answer: yes.
Long answer: wait for my review later this week.
|
10-09-08 01:51pm
|
Review
352
|
Hentai 3D
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Access to Hentai 3D 2 sex simulator PC game.
-Some content of 3D SexVilla 2 (3D Sex Games) plus hentai-themed sex packs.
-Has the same game engine, poses, interface and customization options.
-8 locations (most already available in 3D SexVilla 2).
-3 exclusive hentai locations: tentacles, sci-fi robot in a space hangar, huge demon.
-10 female models. Big eyes, maybe too much natural looking.
-2 male models. Cartoon-like, asian looking. |
| Cons: |
-Story mode is even more inane than those at 3D Sex Games.
-Access to other much less interesting games and previous versions.
-There's some non-downloadable low-key hentai content (images and videos).
-I'm not sure they are adding new game features on a regular basis.
-The same cons I reported for 3D SexVilla 2. |
| Bottom Line: |
Hentai 3D 2 uses the same engine as 3D SexVilla 2 (3D Sex Games). Check my review and others there to get a feel of the game mechanics and customization options. Keep in mind, though, that only part of the features (scenarios, outfits, poses) are available here. Models are also exclusive to this game; but, while the ones at 3D SexVilla 2 were quite well-done and natural looking, the fact that the ones here are also rather natural looking (apart from the big eyes) makes the game somewhat less interesting: I expected a more cartoonish finish. What's more, if I don't recall badly, most models looked very similar while the ones at 3D SexVilla 2 differed substantially among them in body type, hair style and ethnicity.
What really stands out in Hentai 3D 2 are the three hentai-themed locations. This company usually creates impressive scenarios but these three are quite remarkable. If you've played with 3D SexVilla 2, all the monster parts are used like regular sex toys and you also have a few poses which are exclusive to these scenarios. In the tentacles one, you get the character floating in mid-air sustained by some of the tentacles and use some more tentacles to do your job; there's also some sort of "flying leech" that affects the pain meter. In the sci-fi one, you put a huge robot with lots of drilling parts to good use. Finally, there's one in a temple with a huge demon; there's an interesting position with the character hanging from the demon's horns.
3D SexVilla 2 had a very simple story mode but here, it is absolutely terrible; it almost always consists in knowing the definition of hentai terms: Bakunyu, Bukkake, Yaoi, Yuri, ... (had to write the names down to put them in this review). You may ask Google but it's not that difficult: just choose the answer that has some sexual meaning. Even the Story Modes for the three hentai-themed locations suffer from this which is a real letdown.
If you are into sex simulators, the 3 hentai-themed locations are probably worth trying because I don't think other games offer anything similar. Also, if you are pondering whether to go on a monthly membership at 3D Sex Games, you may try most of the game features here and, if you don't like it, at least you'll have seen the hentai-only locations. If you want to go beyond a trial membership, I'd suggest going for 3D Sex Games instead because Hentai 3D 2 has much less available content. |
|
10-04-08 03:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
353
|
Valentina Vaughn
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I was interested in Valentina Vaughn but, as my review shows, I was quite disappointed with the site she is offering. I knew what I was getting into, though. I see things haven't improved since I left: no updates with Valentina Vaughn during last month.
Haven't been at Misha Online yet but I'm not sure Misha has any connection with this site apart from a few photosets. Maybe she helped get the site started (design, etc) but the exclusive content is mostly very artsy and doesn't seem something Misha would shoot, I believe. Given the great amount of Marquis Models content, I thought instead there might be some connection with Angela Melini.
|
10-02-08 02:45pm
|
Reply
354
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Cybertoad, maybe I didn't see it clear enough the other day but I just want to say that your review is well worth it and I'm sure that a surfer looking for HD video will find the recounting of your experience valuable and avoid this site at all costs once they see the advertised HD video is nowhere to be seen.
I see your review and rating are honest for someone looking for a regular solo model site but Morphious seems to be so much into this site and model that I'd very much like him to arrange his thoughts and explain what makes this site so absolutely special for him.
The thing is I believe the site perhaps only SEEMS to advertise itself falsely for several reasons:
a) we usually expect solo model sites (or sites in general) to deliver mainly photos and video on a regular basis: journals, chats, live cams are a rare extra and not the main course;
b) at one point in its 8+ years of existence, the site was a usual solo model site and its design mostly stuck with it;
c) the site design fails at conveying to the visitors what it's really about;
When someone arrives at the site, he sees the model and some white text on a sky blue background on the right that he just ignores: hard to read and his eyes are probably fixed on the girl (at least, that's what I did). He scrolls down the page and sees the icons you mentioned: HD Videos, photos and all. OK, he thinks, we just found a usual solo model site, girl's hot, I like HD video, let's type in the credit card number and get the party started. Reality check: 3 streaming-only video updates in a year and lots of photos which aren't his favorite dish.
That text he ignored (rightfully, as it looks like they wanted people not to read it) says "Welcome to the internet's newest and most extensive reality show yet! Live cams are running 24 hours a day seven days a week to fulfill your voyeuristic pleasures. Go behind the scenes of a woman's world and enjoy". For once, I believe it's not lies in its entirety and this site is, in fact, delivering live voyeur video on a regular basis. OK, I guess those spy cams show recorded video during some hours of the day but Morphious seems to hint that he once caught Francine Dee having sex live on one of the "spy cams"! My crush on Francine Dee died a long time away (never was a member of the site, and never will) but, if that thing can happen in this site, I think it's pretty remarkable.
When you are so much into a model as Morphious seems to be, getting a weekly live chat plus video blogs plus contests plus spy cams plus getting her to call you on the phone during a chat plus being able to bid on her lingerie must make you live with a constant hard-on. HD what? Pictures? You get her LIVE daily! This site fails miserably to deliver HD video by all accounts but 3 different people came here to praise the site (2 reviews, 2 comments). Morphious seems to be the only one who didn't hit and run so I'd very much like him to make some sense of his initial review.
|
10-01-08 12:23pm
|
Reply
355
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Morphious's Reply
Morphious, not to be bitchy but I feel that your last reply is longer and more informative than your own review as it currently is. As you are clearly so fond of the site, would you consider doing a rereview and adding there all this info plus all the other bits you've scattered around?
I know you are new here but extremely short overenthusiastic reviews that go near the 100 rating are usually a bad sign. You seem to be not short of words so make use of those 1000+1000+3000 characters and justify that rating. There's little point in keeping on bugging Cybertoad's review when you have lots of space in a new review.
Check Cybertoad's Catalina Cruz review and compare it with your Francine Dee one to see what I mean.
|
09-30-08 02:42pm
|
Reply
356
|
Fantasy Girl Brooke
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Thanks again. Few new updates but that's a respectable amount of probably exclusive scenes. As I said elsewhere, I'll probably visit the network soon and the scenes alone are just one more reason to do it. Even though other sites in the network will be much more interesting for sure.
|
09-30-08 02:26pm
|
Reply
357
|
Fantasy Girl Brooke
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Thanks for the info. She is not only a beauty (if you manage to ignore the tattoos) but I believe she has quite a character. Pity the site fails to show that side of her. I'll have to make do with the behind the scenes videos when I join. Thanks again.
|
09-30-08 11:28am
|
Comment
358
|
Fantasy Girl Brooke
(0)
|
|
09-29-08 10:03pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
359
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Sorry but I still feel you based your review too much on the video content (or the lack of it). The site seems to have many other things apart from videos. I'm not so sure the site is misleading, either. The home page is misleading but free video section states the right facts. TBP facts also state what you have encountered in video terms. If the site was a video-only site and it offered only what it offers, it would certainly need work but (I may be wrong but) I believe there's much more than videos to this site.
On the other hand, you certainly deserve much more trust than the other two revieweres. Your reviews of Catalina Cruz's network are top notch and I will definitely join those sites in the near future. I decided not to ask the other reviewers for the reasons behind their extremely high rating because, with all due respect, one site fanatics aren't so much different than one book fanatics.
But, just as I am sure the site isn't paradise on earth, it looks like it has some interesting features which the other reviewers only hint at (even though those features are probably the reason why they like the site so much) and you almost completeley left those features aside. I'm not discussing the rating per se but basing the review in only one feature of the side.
|
09-29-08 09:57pm
|
Reply
360
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
With all due respect, is the site such a disaster to deserve a 51 rating? I simpathise with you feeling ripped off because the other reviewers also made me think this site was some sort of paradise but, anyway, a 51 is sending it next to dead sites with 0 content while this one is clearly alive and has a decent amount of picture content.
I've only seen the free tour but it has some things I always appreciate like stating all the updates with dates. I agree the site claims to have "Hi Def video" on the home page but the video section in the free tour only claims to have "HD Flash Video at 1000K" plus ipod and psp versions. Maybe the streaming is at higher resolution than the downloadable ones?
I counted 60 solo picture gallery updates in the first 9 months of this year alone, which is quite a lot for a solo site. What resolution are they in? There was a scheduled chat last week which not so many solo sites really offer although every one claims to do. Did it take place? The contests also seem interesting and are absolutely rare. There seem to be way too many sections which are probably hot air but, anyway, a 51?
All in all, I believe this is a site Francine Dee fans certainly enjoy or she wouldn't be still in the business 8 years after it was launched. I am just guessing, but maybe the other two reviewers let their fan factor influence their first review ever and sent the rating way too high without clearly explaining their reasons.
This site has been on my radar for some time. I probably will never join at this price but I'm sorry to say your review in its current form is just as unhelpful as the other two.
|
09-29-08 02:08pm
|
Review
361
|
Valentina Vaughn
(0)
66.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Official website of Valentina Vaughn, Penthouse Pet on June 2005.
-Beautiful exotic looking professional model.
-No tattoos but a small belly-button piercing.
-75 picture galleries, average 40 pictures each.
-Half of the galleries seem exclusive.
-Galleries are artistic nude or softcore with occasional spreading and mild fingering.
-Some non-nude sets.
-22 videos. Mainly solo artistic nude / softcore or taken during a photo shoot.
-Access to Camz (Private Camz) webcam feeds.
-Model can be contacted via website form.
-Monthly updated diary.
-Free tour lists latest updates. |
| Cons: |
-No zip files.
-Image galleries are flash based. Despite this, some allow 1 by 1 image saving.
-Galleries often resize or rotate images a few degrees, which produces pixellation.
-Image original size is small: 85% are 800x550 or less.
-No option for saving videos: they play in browser.
-Videos are quite low resolution: 90% are 320x240 800kbps 4 minutes long.
-Videos are in one format only. Most are quicktime, with a few wmv.
-Probably very few exclusive videos. Most have Marquis Models watermarks.
-Most videos are a couple years old, with watermarks dating back to 2005-2006.
-Music is the only audio during all the videos.
-No webcam shows by Valentina Vaughn ever.
-Exclusive content seems to be shot mainly in hotel rooms. |
| Bottom Line: |
The model has the looks, knows how to pose and the photos are taken by top photographers. Watching low-resolution versions of good pictures on a cumbersome flash interface makes the experience less than enjoyable. It might be acceptable in a free portfolio site but not when you have typed your credit card info. Flash based galleries nowadays in an adult pay site are hard to justify. I used to think they were an annoying trend that common sense had forced to disappear.
During the last few months, updates consisted mainly of girlfriend sets. Some of them had Valentina Vaughn plus another model but most were solo sets by other models. I believe half of the galleries could be exclusive but, according to watermarks, the other half should be also available at Digital Desire, Misha Online, Marquis Models, Ken Marcus, Penthouse or Juliland (taken by Richard Avery). Non-exclusive videos have watermarks of Marquis Models (almost half), Juliland, Digital Desire, Foot Factory, 24 Main Street. I'd say there are perhaps 3-4 exclusive videos only which are mainly artistic posing.
According to the update log, the site was relaunched in December 2007 but it still has in construction links 9 months later. There's no information on what's the empty "wish list" for or a schedule of cam shows. What's more, every page has a huge banner ad that takes you to abibids.com auction site to see the "new sexy items I'm auctioning off today" but the model seems to have had no listing there in the last 6 months; there's also a non-active niteflirt button (pay-per-minute phone chats) although Valentina Vaughn doesn't appear listed there either. The diary was quite cryptic too; it looked like it was written for life-long friends and not for fans wanting to know what the model was up to.
Go for the trial membership if you like the model and want to sample her work for other sites and some exclusive artistic pictorials. Unless the site gets a serious workout and updates start coming more often, staying for a month like I did is not worth it. |
|
09-28-08 10:33am
Replies (3)
|
Review
362
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Access to 3D SexVilla 2 sex simulator PC game.
-Great graphics: no glitches running at maximum resolution.
-Animation looks natural; movements in the different poses aren't repetitive.
-Good tutorial shows basics of controlling the action with the mouse only.
-20 female, 10 male natural-looking models which you can further customize.
-60 customizations for face (cheek bones, eye spacing), 6 for breast (size, spacing).
-Other customizations: skin, outfits, tattoos, piercings, jewelry, make up, penis length, ...
-18 locations: plane, photo studio, classroom, pirate ship, ...
-Poses: 30 solo (masturbation or posing), 20 1-on-1 (boy-girl or girl-girl with strapon), 3 threesome.
-Sequencer lets you create your own scenes using all game elements plus expressions.
-You may take screen captures or record videos during the normal game.
-Monthly updates: new location, characters, accessories or customization option.
-Customer support is responsive both with game help or technical problems |
| Cons: |
-Advanced game mechanics aren't that well explained.
-Achievements are tied to active membership: you start from scratch every time you join.
-You have to stay connected to the internet to play.
-Story mode is very simplistic and doesn't suppose any challenge at all.
-Models can be brought to orgasm repeatedly using any position in autopilot.
-Website is slow, unpleasant and hard to navigate.
-There are other downloadable games in the site which have little interest.
-Recorded videos or generated sequences can only be played in game.
-No user forum to ask for help or share experiences and tips. |
| Bottom Line: |
You will probably visit the site only once to download the 3D SexVilla 2 game and never come back again. The game asks you to enter the website login and password and will work as long as you have a standing membership to the website.
The game has several different modes. You usually start by picking your character, your partner character and a scenario. Story Mode puts you through a short intro where you have to pick the right action/answer to your partner in order to move to the sex part. Once in the scenario, you go on choosing the poses for your characters and they perform it at the stated speed until you choose another one. Each pose is always available only in 1-2 places at each scenario. Sequencer Mode gives you a timeline where you can put all the poses, outfits, expressions, camera positions, etc; you then hit the play button and the characters do all the things you asked them to.
The game uses a "sex coin" currency which you can get in two ways: by bringing characters to orgasm (maxing up their pleasure meter) while in Story Mode or by staying a member of the site for a certain period of time. Sex coins are spent in "sex packs". Some typical sex packs: a scenario (including related outfits, toys and sometimes poses), 2-3 models (1 male + 1 or 2 females usually of the same ethnicity), 3-4 sex toys, a character customization option, 3-4 related poses (there is a sex pack for titfuck, threesomes, footjobs, blowjobs or lesbian only poses).
There is, though, a maximum to the total number of earned coins that increases every certain hours; so, if you are using the trial membership, there's no way you can get absolutely every single "sex pack" even if you put your models on a 48 hour fuckathon as the coins cap for the first 48 hours won't allow more than 10-12 sex packs (prices vary). A bit of advance planning is advisable so you can get the specific pack you want.
Despite its technical excellence, I probably used it more while I had a trial membership earlier this year than during my just finished 3-month membership. Having to go through the same lame stories (=choosing the right multiple answer for 2-3 questions) and knowing that, whatever position I put them in, the models will orgasm and give me the coins made the experience less enjoyable this time. Models have some sort of personality (giver, taker, passive) and they some times complain ("I want to try another pose!", "Slow down", "Faster, faster!") but if you stick to the same position and speed you will get the coins anyway.
It's certainly worth a try, probably the best sex simulator. But, unless they solve the returning members issue, come up with decent stories, make the game a bit more challenging and allow some kind of interaction between site members I will only recomend the trial membership. |
|
09-28-08 09:44am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
363
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
IKnoPorn's Comment
Thanks for the tip and for an excellent review. Your suggestion to stick to the model list has proven useful.
|
09-27-08 10:24am
|
Reply
364
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Review
I'm almost certain this site doesn't allow you to download any pictures or videos.
I was a member of Miss Laura Lee, another site done with the same content engine (RT Web Designs) and a script blocks all attemps at right-clicking. If you check the free section of Naughty Natalie XOXO, you can see it for yourself: if you right-click on any page, no context menu appears.
|
09-27-08 09:06am
|
Reply
365
|
The Minion
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
I wasn't familiar with The Minion's story until recently so I don't know whether any of the scenes were released previously. I did some research and I'm not sure if they will be filming more updates than the 150+ scenes that Chico Wang did. Scenes, so, are probably a couple years old. Maybe, if the site is successful enough, the guy will perform in some more scenes.
The Minion now goes by the name Doron Pepperscone and works as PA for Billy Watson (owner or director of most sites in this network). If you are interested in his story, there's a podcast interview with him at PornStar Podcast. There's also another one with Billy Watson.
|
09-21-08 02:36am
|
Reply
366
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
JFYI, they have recently lowered the price back to $19.95.
|
09-08-08 12:10am
|
Comment
367
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
|
08-28-08 02:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
368
|
Curry Creampie
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Good catch. When you join a MILF site, you don't expect all models to have children in real life but this case is different.
As further proof, some American porn starts I spotted in the free tour: Luscious Lopez as Kumani, Alexis Love as Shanti, Nikara (aka Aurora Jolie) as Ara, Ricki White as Ashari, ... None are known for being "100% Indian" and it's very unlinkely they were "fucked on film for the first time" for this particular site as the tagline claims.
|
08-26-08 10:25am
|
Reply
369
|
Bitches In Training
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks for confirming my suspicions. I used to think the Girlvert series had quite a following so I don't understand why they are offering it with a different name through this site. Looks like the plot / recurring story is thinner than I thought.
One correction, though: Ashley Blue is NOT the director of the Girlvert series. According to iafd.com, she's been appearing in the series since #2 but the director is Jim Powers. Among other things, Ashley Blue's directed the "Attention Whores" series which also has an interesting premise: porn stars who act as divas / prima donnas during their scenes. The result, depending on the porn stars involved, can be quite funny.
|
08-25-08 01:36pm
|
Reply
370
|
Bitches In Training
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
"Dixie" is played by Ashley Blue, a well known porn star who also directs a DVD series entitled "Girlvert". As the themes are almost identical, I believe this site could consist of the scenes from that series alone. There should be a recurring story behind the different titles in the series, which might be interesting if you can catch them all in a single site. Thanks for the heads up.
|
08-25-08 10:32am
|
Reply
371
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
Bletch's Reply
Sorry if I didn't make myself clear. What I meant is that everyone sees 14.95 USD at the TBP/PU site but, once you go to the Devil's Film site, they are using regional pricing and you see the price in your local currency: 14.95 GBP in the UK, 14.95 EUR in the EU or 14.95 USD in the USA.
|
08-24-08 11:48pm
|
Reply
372
|
The Real Me
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
Your review prompted me to join and I really liked what I saw. I haven't had time to watch all the content but so far, so good. For a trial membership, it's a real bargain if you like this type of content.
I was prompted to research around the site and the sad thing is that the site is for sale. I came across a webmaster message board where the owner of the site said he was listening to offers. I doubt that there will be any updates in the meantime. If the site is sold, it's unclear whether the new owners will be able to keep up with the quality of the first 14 updates.
|
08-22-08 03:16pm
|
Reply
373
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Glad that you found my review useful. It was my second review ever but I feel it's still accurate. Ever since I discovered Jaime Hammer's site, what's offered here is what I expect in other solo sites and most fall short for one reason or another. That's why this site stays at the top of my list of reviews.
If you like her personality, let me suggest that you try to make it to one of her webcam chats. As for her major assets, she is currently working mainly for her site so this is almost the only place where you can find her recent pictures and videos. She recently did, though, some pretty awesome sets for Digital Desire, which were being released here even before they were available at DD.
One more detail that, IMHO, sets this site apart is that there was a message board thread asking site members about their opinion prior to raising the price. They also added multimonth membership options then.
|
08-22-08 03:07pm
|
Review
374
|
XOXO Leah
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Good-looking web-only US softcore model.
-All-natural, zero tattoos, zero piercings.
-Exclusive content. Model cannot be found anywhere else.
-Some good photos, as long as you are OK with lots of airbrushing.
-I liked the choice of outfits.
-Good interaction with the model.
-Model ends up usually fully nude. Softcore posing.
Current Weekly Update Rate:
-1 photo gallery.
-2 videos from the gallery: 1 BTS, 1 camera tease (10 min each).
-1 short diary entry. Diary entries are dated.
-1 hour webcam chat. Full recorded chat is also released. |
| Cons: |
-The site has lots of little navigation annoyances.
-Flashy tour but extremely plain design inside.
-Photography style is always the same.
-Photos are very repetitive: few different poses.
-Videos are too slow paced; this makes them quite boring.
-Model speaks very rarely.
-Model isn't very skilled at posing (she's barely 19, though).
-Bad lighting. Content can be too dark or have strange shadows.
-Weird rebilling options: 1-month is the least expensive per month. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has a great looking all-natural model, a good update schedule and some decent content but also a plethora of little drawbacks that eventually left me with a sense of missed opportunity. Maybe the creators should subscribe to other sites and see how things are done.
I used to think Mac and Bumble (known for airbushing their photos a lot) was the pinnacle of glamour photography so this site's extensive airbrushing isn't a great issue for me. Some of the photos are very worth watching but they are so repetitive that I often came back to photo 4 or 5 before I realised I'd already seen the whole gallery and I'd returned to the start. There's also too much cropping: some limb is often left out of the photo and there are way too much photos of the torso only (boobs and panties, no face). The photos are somewhat small. Ironically, the webmaster started a poll four months ago asking if people would like 1800x1200 photos; everyone answered yes but you still get 1000x670.
Having a 10 minutes behind-the-scenes video and 10 minutes more of camera teasing for each set is a great idea. The trouble is that both videos are extremely slow paced and pretty much indistinguishable except for where the model is looking at: photo camera or video camera. Poses can be sustained for a whole minute except for slight head movements or hair rearrangements, you get long sustained zooms to a body part while the model doesn't move at all, the same music clips over and over in every video even when the model can be seen speaking directly to the camera (no voice can be heard). With a few exceptions, the videos are very unsexy.
Regarding the chats, I haven't attended any (Thursdays, 8PM CST) but I've browsed several of the recorded ones. It's nice to have 1 hour long weekly chats and also have the full recording released a couple of weeks later. Looks like she often wears some costume (nurse, maid, etc) which she gradually takes off. The trouble is that she doesn't speak at all despite the feed has audio. Watching an hour long of video of a hot girl typing and, occasionally standing up to do some striptease isn't worth it. It's probably different if you catch it live but the no-talk is a clear minus anyway. Is her voice so unsexy? Some editing and some more talking would be welcome for the recorded ones.
She's very active in the forum (2-3 posts per day) and is also reachable by email or PM in the forum. Together with the chats and the (somewhat short and generic) weekly diary entries makes for very good interaction. The webmaster is also reachable in the forum and complaints are listened to. |
|
08-16-08 01:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
375
|
Flexible Positions
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Scenes shot at a couple different private gyms.
-Models are dressed in work out clothes.
-Focuses more on the workout theme than flexibility.
-10 scenes so far. Launched recently.
-All models are well known USA porn stars. Big fake boobs on all of them.
-If you want flexibility, check Angelina Valentine or Maya Gates' scenes. Little flexibility in other scenes.
-Audrey Bitoni or Rachel Roxxx aren't that flexible but put up very naughty performances.
-Accessible from Porn Pros Network. Check my review there for further pros and cons. |
| Cons: |
-Scene structure and the type of workout are always the same. It can get repetitive.
-Last scene was released almost a month ago.
-Most models aren't flexible at all. Most don't know how to use the gym machines.
-Viewer should be flexible too. The camera is often rotated 90 degrees.
-Lots of attention to boobs, little to asses. Strange for a workout site.
-Cameraman/director talks a lot and gives instructions aloud during the scene.
-Male performer (Anthony Rosano) is the same in 90% of the scenes. He does OK but he's all over this network.
-Check Porn Pros Network site tour for a quick list of scenes with dates.
-The usual drawbacks of Porn Pros Network. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is somewhat of a misnomer. The Flexible Positions are rarely little more than a leg in the air or laying on a big soft gym ball during the sex. The scenes aren't that bad, though. The models are top porn stars and they look great. But the sex in most scenes wouldn't look out of place in a different setting: instead of fucking on a couch, they do it on the bench of a gym machine. A gym floor is just like any other floor. The big soft ball is probably the only unique element and certainly makes for a couple new and interesting positions.
The scene structure is always the same:
1) Girl works out alone on various gym machines; usually while talking to cameraman.
2) The "trainer" joins in and shows her "how to do it", groping and licking a bit more than a real trainer would.
3) Regular sex scene using the gym elements and a few more flexible than usual positions. The big soft ball is quite a find.
Parts 1 and 2 take up usually a third of the scene and are what set apart the site. You get to see several of the models running for a short while with their tits flying free. Quite a nice and unusual view. They also seem to do it for real getting to pant and sweat a bit. They also work on other machines trying to showcase their best assets (tits, mainly; why not the asses too?). Nice use of the thighmaster. When the male performer enters the stage, they often repeat some of the exercises while he gropes or directly licks them as they work out. There's no kind of script at all. Scenes usually get stuck in a middle point between acting and not acting. The male performer is always introduced as a trainer and he uses lots of gym jargon but the girls never pretend to be surprised when he goes straight to lick their tits or pussy. They know from the start what they are here for. They should script their scenes a little more or leave aside this trainer fallacy.
The site would be much more interesting if the scenes were more like the one with Angelina Valentine. She displays her usual enthusiasm and pulls some nice tricks: she does splits to the guys cock, gives him head while hanging upside down from one of the machines or gets licked while doing a back bent. Maya Gates has never done if for me, but she puts up what's probably the most remarkable scene: a very flexible performance with lots of different positions; she and her "trainer" make good use of her ability to sustain a back bent.
I have a soft spot for Audrey Bitoni and Rachel Roxxx. Both aren't that flexible but they put up some pretty good scenes here. It would make sense if they got their own Deep Throat Love scene (very recommendable site in this same network) as they show here they have what it takes to be there. Just as Deep Throat Love only hires models who can deep throat, maybe Flexible Positions should consider hiring models who can honor the site's name. |
|
08-08-08 04:17pm
Replies (0)
|
|
