| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
It's only a typo :) Speed and navigation can be frustrating depending of the severity but I've answered little info about models because I've recently been a member of a couple sites where they failed to properly link to other scenes by the models in the scene. I really don't care about measurements, ethnicity, age, etc. that many sites display in a model's page but if a model interests me, I'd like to be able to find all her scenes in the site.
|
08-16-09 06:10am
|
Reply
227
|
Whale Tail 'N
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
If you compare the cast at this site with the cast of the DVD series at iafd, there's a lot of overlap. What's more, some of the DVDs are available at DVD sites and the previews there are for the same scenes seen at Whale Tail'N preview pages.
On the other hand, none of the DVDs in the series has Jessica Lynn or Rachel Roxxx (among others) in the cast but Whale Tail'N shows them in the preview page. So, unless there's a DVD in the series not listed anywhere, those might be original scenes.
|
08-16-09 06:01am
|
Comment
228
|
Non-Nude Cams
(0)
|
|
08-14-09 01:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
229
|
Upskirt Mania.it
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Site is also in English: at the top right corner there's a tiny icon of the Union Jack that switches to English version.
|
08-13-09 03:03am
|
Reply
230
|
Real Punting
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
I used to think punter was a UK slang term for customer, whether it's of a regular shop or a prostitute.
|
08-07-09 01:25am
|
Reply
231
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Apart from linking to the full image, thumbnails should help users decide whether they are interested in a picture or not. I agree that automatic cropping is useless for this purpose.
I've never seen it in an adult site but there's a technique that combines resizing and cropping to get a different type of thumbnails: you first crop to the significant part of an image (a human has to decide which part for each image) and then resize to the final thumbnail size. The resulting human-cropped thumbnail would make sense because it would help users choose images much better than a mere resize.
If you take the usual set at sites like Twistys, there's usually little difference between a photo and the next. It would be interesting to see this technique used to highlight those differences via the thumbnails so users would be able to tell whether the model is covering her breast or pinching her nipple; pointing at her pussy or actually fingering it; just smiling or actually licking her lips. And so on. You rarely get this level of detail with a mere resize.
In fact, if you look at the free preview galleries around the net of Twistys and similar sites, you'll see they use this technique in order to leave as little blank space in the page as possible. The ones I've seen, resize the portrait ones and use this technique for the landscape ones.
|
08-04-09 02:58pm
|
Reply
232
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
First of all, thanks to the PU staff for running this poll of mine even though I was unable to put it in a less confusing way.
I'd go for resizing with the same percentage (2) even though you lose a lot of space in the page. My ideal would be cropping to squares (1) but if (and only if) there was some human hand-picking the most important part of the image and cropping to it.
Just as Drooler, the system I dislike the most is cropping landscape to portrait dimensions (3) even though I also find unpleasant when they are resized with different percentages (4): portraits always end up being too tiny.
After I submitted the poll, I came across an equally bad thumbnail system: Bangbros Network makes decent thumbnails with no cropping but resizes them all to some arbitrary landscape dimensions through the HTML code. Thumbnails of portrait pictures end up hinting the full pictures show aliens having sex.
|
08-04-09 11:05am
|
Reply
233
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
kkman112's Reply
You make a good point but I can't help but think it's someone who bought a couple memberships and is trying to make a few easy bucks
My concern is those videos have an upload date from a year ago and no one has done anything about it. If Clips 4 Sale only offers the "a posteriori" copyright control you suggest, I can't help but doubt they are doing much in terms of enforcing other legal aspects like model releases and so on.
|
08-03-09 03:54am
|
Reply
234
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
Reality Kings currently has a beta site available to all members where they offer one of the best streaming players I've come across so far in a reality site: flash technology, thumbnails of key frames and everything you'd probably expect after your experience with VideoBox.
Take into account, though, that Reality Kings used to have a disappointing WMV streaming system that is the only one still available at the old members area.
On the other hand, I believe they are constantly making changes to the player. I've used it only occasionally and the way it looks like now is very different than what I remembered from a couple weeks ago. It's also somewhat better than I remembered.
If you want to queue the download of some scenes, keep in mind that scene URLs change every few hours.
|
08-02-09 12:18pm
|
Comment
235
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
|
08-01-09 09:13am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
236
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Comment
Since this site is just a platform for studios to sell their content, maybe you could try contacting both the studio where you bought the clip and the common Clips 4 Sale tech support.
|
08-01-09 08:59am
|
Reply
237
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I'm also using the beta site and I don't see a download limit either. I've downloaded up to 8 Gbytes from a single site in 12 hours and haven't hit any noticeable limit.
|
07-28-09 11:10am
|
Reply
238
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
That's a nice 2 in 1 poll.
|
07-25-09 02:14am
|
Reply
239
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Netsirk's Reply
No harm done. When a company offers a plethora of sites and some of them offer access to some of the others, it sometimes gets confusing which site you should join to get the most content.
After reading the TBP follow-up review on Mega Site Pass back in March 2009, it seemed that Mega Site Pass was offering a subset of what is available through Porn.com. That's why I wrote the comment wondering if Porn.com gave you all the Mega Site Pass plus the Download Pass content while Mega Site Pass and Download Pass memberships alone didn't offer access to one another.
Regarding the billing concerns, it's good to know that your billing provider would block people from joining two sites that give access to the same content, like Porn.com and one of the exclusive reality sites.
|
07-23-09 03:18pm
|
Reply
240
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
I had the same question when I wrote my Porn.com comment on 03-14-09 (Mega Site Pass + Download Pass = Porn.com?). At that time, according to the TBP facts and what I could gather from my Porn.com membership, it looked like you got the most content possible when joining Porn.com; the other two sites only gave you partial content. On a side note, I was unpleasantly surprised about not getting any reply from someone at the company since they have a pretty active webmaster at PU.
I never gave much importance to a company offering the same content through different domains (TBP is extremely helpful in identifying these situations) but you certainly have a point regarding customers accidentally joining the same content from two different domains.
On the other hand, I once tried to join a site through ccbill to get a temporary offer even though I had a couple days left of a monthly membership. ccbill detected the credit card I was using was still linked to a valid membership to the site and didn't let me join again. I wonder if the billing setting / provider this company uses in its myriad of sites would also block similar double membership attempts.
|
07-20-09 11:38am
|
Reply
241
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Currently, I see no indication inside members' area (new or old) regarding Full HD quality being offered.
|
07-19-09 01:37pm
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Rarely I'm a member of more than one site at a time so I usually type because Firefox has two handy features: autocomplete and a list of most visited sites. I start typing the first times I visit and it soon becomes one of the most visited sites and I just choose from the drop-down list from then on.
Occasionally, I keep the various sites I'm a member in a bookmark folder so I can open all of them in tabs with a single mouse click.
|
07-15-09 01:27pm
|
Reply
243
|
Porno 4 Portables
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
You are not the only one who feels this way. Here's a forum thread where people voice similar opinions:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=520
|
07-11-09 09:21am
|
Reply
244
|
Pornstar.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks for the info. Since the stars listed are long time retired, I wouldn't completely rule out the possibility the sites are official: official sites are rarely good but the ones from retired stars are usually the most officially bad ones.
|
07-11-09 03:56am
|
Comment
245
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
|
07-11-09 03:34am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
246
|
Pornstar.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
When you say screencaps do you mean you get the promo pictures of the shoots or just frames from the movie? The free tour seems to suggest promo stills shot with a photo camera while filming the scene.
There isn't any info on the tour regarding the number of DVDs ("1,000s" could be just 1,000?). The samples don't seem to be exclusive: there are probably other sites that have most of the videos and better search engine.
The free tour also says you get access to 8 solo sites including ones for Kobe Tai or Racquel Darrian. Did you get to those sites? Are those the official sites?
|
07-11-09 01:52am
|
Reply
247
|
Sandee Westgate
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
As I stated in the review, this site does everything I believe a solo model site should do : new videos and pictures every week, weekly cam shows, more interaction than you can handle, even a 24/7 spy cam, ... The content is highly professional and Sandee Westgate keeps slowly rising her limits over the years. I considered scoring it even higher.
Given the sorry state of the majority of solo sites around I don't think scoring this site in the 90s is undeserved. If there's an up and running solo website that is the absolute perfection and, so, deserves a 100, I doubt it does things much differently than this one.
|
06-24-09 02:19pm
|
Reply
248
|
Matrix Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Try Matrix HD instead. The site has the same look but the join page works. I read somewhere some time ago that they were planning to make Matrix HD their consumer site instead of Matrix Nudes.
|
06-20-09 05:19am
|
Comment
249
|
Naked.com
(0)
|
|
06-15-09 03:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
250
|
TS Kimber James
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
I don't know now but Kimber James did look feminine before with the darker hair. I didn't suspect anything when I saw the first photo of Kimber James at Christian's blog about a year ago where he introduced the photo simply as "a girl I worked with" leaving aside the TS factor. I see Christian's done several scenes at this site.
|
06-12-09 10:26am
|
