| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
marat93's Comment
I got a trial for Playboy's CyberClub a couple days ago. Got billed by Local Billing and was able to cancel the trial membership online without any problem. I am still on the trial period but I already got a confirmation email for my cancellation.
As this site is listed as a clone of Playboy's CyberClub, maybe you should try joining that site.
|
10-20-08 10:53am
|
Reply
302
|
Playboy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
I doubt it. Never been a member but was a member of sister site Playboy Cyberclub some years ago. I don't remember any such thing when I was a member though it's something I would surely have looked into.
As far as I know, Playboy magazine is published as a franchise in many countries: they get the brand for the magazine and get to publish photo sets from the various USA editions but also do their own original content. So this site is unlikely to hold the rights (or be remotely interested in holding them) for a photo set from a celebrity that posed nude in an international edition.
Back in the day, Playboy Cyberclub would only get you a small portion from Playboy's archives and very small pictures. Things may have changed because I see that this site is now run by Brazzers Network. But I still doubt they publish anything not produced for the USA edition.
|
03-10-12 10:01am
|
Reply
303
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
They are marketing all these new scenes in a separate site, Passion HD, even though it looks like all the scenes are also available on Porn Pros Network.
|
03-24-12 10:51am
|
Comment
304
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
|
01-08-12 09:48am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
305
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
|
05-31-09 03:43am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
306
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
The Clyde's Review
Aren't they releasing at least some of the newer videos at 720x408? I'm not a member but I noticed that some of the previews for the most recent scenes were at this higher resolution.
Dead-on cons: I also wish they limited the fake cock scenes to a single site. It would give the network a whole different appearance.
|
04-20-09 11:46am
|
Comment
307
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
|
02-07-09 06:14am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
308
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
I was mainly interested in the video content so I didn't download many zipsets but the ones for Deep Throat Love. I recently checked the few I had downloaded and let me stress that not only the pictures are small but they don't have much interest but to evoque particular moments of the video once you've seen it. Maybe also to catch a glimpse at the BTS of the shoot as the models are sometimes caught off guard or being plain goofy.
They are mainly shot during the scene but also many "pretty girl" ones shot before the scene. Weird camera angles (like the camera rotated 45 degrees), overexposed and blurred ones are quite common. There are lots and lots of them, so not much photo editing is taking place.
|
08-05-08 01:43pm
|
Review
309
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to 9 sites in the network. See facts at TBP. Total 400+ scenes.
-A couple more sites have been added recently: Sleep Creep, Flexible Positions.
-Free tour pages correctly list all updates at the sites with dates.
-Very good navigation system: easy access to all sites from everywhere.
-Breadcrumbs let you move around quickly within a set or the whole network.
-Search option finds matching performers and set descriptions.
-Every set has video, picture gallery and screencaps.
-Videos are 35 minutes long. Max resolution: 512x288 (1200kbps).
-Multiple video options: stream, flash, 1 minute clips, full video or chunks download.
-Photos are 850x567. Zip files. Up to 600 images per set.
-100 screencaps per set help get a quick idea of the video.
-Users can rate sets (1-10 stars). There's also a favorites section.
-Female models are usually pretty well known porn stars.
-All sites but Euro Humpers are being updated. 6-7 network updates a week. |
| Cons: |
-Very low download speed. Usually, 100 kbytes/s. Never beyond 200 kbytes/s.
-Downloads cannot be resumed.
-Somewhat low resolutions. Although videos look quite good anyway.
-No downloads completed with Firefox 3. Had to use IE7.
-3 ads for Brazzer's Network, Reality Kings and other networks on every single page.
-Pictures in the ads are much bigger than set thumbnails/previews.
-Regional pricing: price for EU users is 25 EUR (40 USD).
-Some models are listed with wrong or only partial names. Or listed twice.
-Sets with two models cannot be found listing all sets of each one.
-Model name list is in reverse alphabetical order!? |
| Bottom Line: |
This is intented to be a technical description of the network. The content is technically homogeneous but the genres are quite diverse: girls having sex with guys sporting huge fake plastic cocks (Freaks Of Cock), alleged teens (18 Years Old), fake personal sex tapes (Real Ex Girlfriends), an intended comedic/ass centered one (40 oz Bounce) or a deepthroat focused one (Deep Throat Love) to name a few. I'll try to add reviews/comments in the future to some of the sites in the network.
Despite the technical issues, I enjoyed my subscription. Networks' sites are usually just an excuse to put the models in different settings but here you get quite different type of sites. You'll probably find the same models as in any other US network, though. If you are interested in joining one of the sites, I'd suggest joining through this to access them all, just in case. The free tour lists all sets you can find inside and you get image and video previews. Worth checking out first to get a feel.
The reason why there are huge ads of three other networks on every page is beyond my understanding. I am determined to check Brazzer's Network ASAP. And Reality Kings. I enjoyed Porn Pros Network quite a lot but there must be a reason why they try so hard to sell me those other networks. It's unlikely they have worse download speeds. |
|
07-13-08 10:59am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
310
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Netsirk's Reply
No harm done. When a company offers a plethora of sites and some of them offer access to some of the others, it sometimes gets confusing which site you should join to get the most content.
After reading the TBP follow-up review on Mega Site Pass back in March 2009, it seemed that Mega Site Pass was offering a subset of what is available through Porn.com. That's why I wrote the comment wondering if Porn.com gave you all the Mega Site Pass plus the Download Pass content while Mega Site Pass and Download Pass memberships alone didn't offer access to one another.
Regarding the billing concerns, it's good to know that your billing provider would block people from joining two sites that give access to the same content, like Porn.com and one of the exclusive reality sites.
|
07-23-09 03:18pm
|
Reply
311
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
I had the same question when I wrote my Porn.com comment on 03-14-09 (Mega Site Pass + Download Pass = Porn.com?). At that time, according to the TBP facts and what I could gather from my Porn.com membership, it looked like you got the most content possible when joining Porn.com; the other two sites only gave you partial content. On a side note, I was unpleasantly surprised about not getting any reply from someone at the company since they have a pretty active webmaster at PU.
I never gave much importance to a company offering the same content through different domains (TBP is extremely helpful in identifying these situations) but you certainly have a point regarding customers accidentally joining the same content from two different domains.
On the other hand, I once tried to join a site through ccbill to get a temporary offer even though I had a couple days left of a monthly membership. ccbill detected the credit card I was using was still linked to a valid membership to the site and didn't let me join again. I wonder if the billing setting / provider this company uses in its myriad of sites would also block similar double membership attempts.
|
07-20-09 11:38am
|
Review
312
|
Porn.com
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-4,500 DVDs total. 4 new DVDs added daily.
-40+ exclusive reality sites. But only 3-4 updates per week.
-Both real photos and screen captures from DVD scenes.
-Video high resolution is Divx (xvid codec): 576x432 2000kbps.
-Also available as WMV (480x360 1000kbps) or low resolution MP4.
-Cool and pretty accurate "find similar stars" features.
-Decent metadata: female and male cast, production date.
-Simple search engine but seems to be pretty accurate.
-Free tour shows everything you will find inside.
-Download Pass and Mega Site Pass under a single membership. |
| Cons: |
-Very low speed: rarely over 100 Kbytes/s; often much less.
-Download managers, futile: links die fast and are non-resumable.
-DVD scenes renamed to custom scene description in search results: no info on what DVD they come from.
-Featured star hides DVD info.
-Inconsistent page design: featured vs search vs non-featured.
-Too simple streaming: play, pause, skip are the only options.
-Some of the reality scenes may also be found at DVD sites.
-Like most DVD sites, there's a huge overlap with other sites.
-Somewhat small images: longest axis is only 1024px.
-ZIP files have always 25 pictures regardless of gallery size.
-Site design looks outdated compared to similar sites.
-Download Pass or Porn.com watermarks on all videos.
-Gay and transexual content intermixed in search results.
-Case-sensitive CAPTCHA login. Sessions timeout in minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
First time I heard of Porn.com was probably when the domain sold for 9.7 million USD in 2007. I came across it some time ago while browsing for discounts at TBP. I guess people who type Porn.com or just Porn directly on their browser's address bar are the main visitors.
This site tries to be a lot of things but, in my humble opinion, they get it wrong more often than right. Like their new picture search engine: looks pretty cool and well-thought out but, in the end, you get 1024px big photos and zip files with only a sample of the gallery. In general, I feel they should rethink how they display the information in search results and porn star pages.
Porn.com was painfully slow for me. What's worse, you get only one chance to download a video: once you start downloading, the URL is instantly dead for retries so resuming a paused download is not possible. On top of it, querying downloads is neither an option since URLs change every hour or so. Streaming speed isn't good either: you must hit pause and wait for a long time if you want to avoid eating up the buffer. There was an entry at their official blog on 03/20/09 entitled "Porn.com gets porn fast" [sic] that contained a very true sentence: "I urge you to free your porn from slow downloads!!". Roger. Canceling my membership was quite easy.
Another thing I didn't like about Porn.com was the Featured Star option. Good side is they often get some exclusive footage and video interview; bad side is that, once a star becomes featured, her page gets an unusable layout where there's no information on what DVDs her scenes come from, just those absurd scene descriptions that seem to be a trademark of this site. To top it all, streaming interviews of featured stars are non-pausable and, because of the slow speed, it's impossible to view them but in short unintelligible bursts.
Despite all this, if they solved the speed issues (speed for American users is likely better than those I got in Europe) this would be a recommendable site by its sheer amount of content even though, as in any DVD site, there's a huge overlap with what other companies offer; average production date seems to be a bit older than usual and there's not a lot of very recent content but this could easily be a pro for some.
Some of the reality scenes aren't that exclusive since they have been released as DVDs and are available at any big DVD website (Whale Tail 'N, for instance). What I could see of Brother Undercover seemed an interesting politically incorrect twist on the interracial genre. |
|
04-11-09 05:19am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
313
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
|
03-14-09 04:46am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
314
|
Porno 4 Portables
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
You are not the only one who feels this way. Here's a forum thread where people voice similar opinions:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=520
|
07-11-09 09:21am
|
Review
315
|
Pornpros Mobile
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Mobile version of Porn Pros Network.
- Accessible with main network membership.
- Big buttons, clean layout, simple structure.
- Two layout versions : light and regular.
- Images are 480x320. 8-10 per scene. All landscape.
- Mobile-friendly image slideshow implementation.
- Videos: MP4 400x224 (800 & 300bps), 3gp 352x288 (300bps).
- All videos also available in 8 parts (highest resolution only).
- Video parts have representative thumbnails.
- Links to mobile versions of official blog and twitter.
- Scenes grouped by site, category, stars or date order.
- Ads for other sites don't get in the way.
- No need to login on every visit. |
| Cons: |
- They claim 6,000+ scenes but “only” have around 2,200.
- Fixed 320px site width. May look small on newest devices.
- Only 10 images per scene.
- Older scenes have no pictures or not all video formats.
- No scene trailers but mobile free tour has them.
- Search function doesn’t work for model names.
- On scene page, no info on which site it comes from.
- Video and images resolutions may be too low for newest devices.
- Several minor bugs make the experience less pleasing.
- Pictures don't work in light version.
- Nags as in main site: scene recycling, model identification, etc. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the mobile version of US reality porn site Porn Pros Network. It’s a simple yet complete site, good for checking new updates and for the occasional viewing. Things go increasingly bad in older scenes: as you go backwards in time, you start finding scenes with no photos, videos or any content at all. As I've said in the past speaking of mobile porn sites from other networks, I don’t think it’s worth signing up just for the mobile site but it's a nice addition to the main membership.
The picture part is remarkable even though they offer 10 images per scene at most. Instead of mimicking what’s usually available in non-mobile sites (hundreds of images, many of them almost identical, in a thumbnail gallery) they go for a slideshow with the most representative landscape ones. A single orientation is good because you don’t have to keep rotating your phone to make the most of your screen real estate. Images don’t seem to be picked at random and I was under the impression that not all images were also available in the main site. Next image is automatically preloaded and clicking next loads image without refreshing page, so getting an idea of what kind of images the scene has is fast. You may get back to the main scene page by a simple back button click. All around, a simple but thought-out functionality.
Video viewing is fairly well done. I’d appreciate getting trailers, tough. Just as viewing 10 images serves great for sampling the pictures from an update, it would make sense if they offered in the members section the trailers that are already available in the mobile free tour. Trailers are also available inside main members area.
Flaws from the main site crept into the mobile version. Scenes that the main site recycles get recycled here too. My pet peeve is the lack of proper model identification. They only have room for one model name; with luck, one of the models gets her name entered but some scenes get just two first names. The mobile site has flaws and bugs of its own, like some weird issues with the numbering in galleries and failing to identify in a scene page what site it comes from.
There are some extras that make sense in a mobile site. There’s a twitter feed of the most recent tweets from PornPros official account, although there’s something wrong with its integration with the official Twitter App. They also have a mobile optimized version of their blog and the BTS videos played without issues on my phone. |
|
01-22-12 02:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
316
|
Pornstar XS
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Comment
Pretty cool although it's not obvious the feature is available.
The implementation, though, could be somewhat better. Browser doesn't request the image until you click on the arrow which causes a short delay between the click and the image appearing. This could be easily avoided by prefetching the first image of each scene. They could also request all the images in a scene once you click one of the arrows.
It's also not clear how many images there are once you start clicking; usually, there are 6 but sometimes more or less.
I also noticed some times nothing happened when I click the next arrow for the first time. Looks like some scenes' first image is the same as the default one.
|
02-21-09 06:32am
|
Reply
317
|
Pornstar.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks for the info. Since the stars listed are long time retired, I wouldn't completely rule out the possibility the sites are official: official sites are rarely good but the ones from retired stars are usually the most officially bad ones.
|
07-11-09 03:56am
|
Reply
318
|
Pornstar.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
When you say screencaps do you mean you get the promo pictures of the shoots or just frames from the movie? The free tour seems to suggest promo stills shot with a photo camera while filming the scene.
There isn't any info on the tour regarding the number of DVDs ("1,000s" could be just 1,000?). The samples don't seem to be exclusive: there are probably other sites that have most of the videos and better search engine.
The free tour also says you get access to 8 solo sites including ones for Kobe Tai or Racquel Darrian. Did you get to those sites? Are those the official sites?
|
07-11-09 01:52am
|
Comment
319
|
Pornstars Lick
(0)
|
|
08-28-09 11:57am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
320
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Comment
One thing you could try is going first to:
http://exclusive.premiumpass.com/Login/login/
Then, paste in a new window/tab the access key's direct URL:
http://www.premiumpass.com/accesskey.php
In my tests, the image was the same that was displayed in the login page. If you see the 6 letters, you should type them at the login form.
If this doesn't work, check other browsers like Google Chrome or Opera. Although, in my experience, if things go wrong in both IE and Firefox, it's likely some antivirus / firewall program in your computer is interfering.
|
05-10-09 01:37pm
|
Reply
321
|
Priest Damian
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Torbe is quite a celebrity here in Spain. He has even made a couple cameos in mainstream movies and had a recurring collaboration in a national TV show. It all started with a blog about porn and his experiences with whores called "puta locura" (fucking madness or, literally, bitch madness).
As for your question, I'm not a member but I found an update log at the "puta locura" site. It looks Padre Damián aka Priest Damian was updating once a month in 2008 but the last episode is from Jan-02-2009. I believe there should be 19 episodes so far. The whole network seems to be currently updating several times a week.
|
03-07-09 02:33am
|
Reply
322
|
Priya Anjali Rai
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Thanks for your input. I always have a very hard time deciding the right score. I usually end up trying to follow the rating guidelines. In this case, I felt the site "Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend." so it's an "Average".
I remembered I had some solo sites at 75 with similar amount of high resolution content but where updates where erratic or the model was not involved at all (no diary, no cam shows) so I raised it a little bit to 78. I also took into account that the site has a clear schedule of updates for the next month and a half so it will keep on growing, albeit a bit too slowly.
On a side note, I always rate sites compared to other ones in that class. For instance, I rated at 80 a couple solo sites but also a big reality network even though, if I had to choose only one, that network would definitely be the one getting my money. I also have another reality network at 75, which I would always recommend over any solo site like this one.
|
02-22-09 01:03am
|
Review
323
|
Priya Anjali Rai
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Official website of Indian born US based porn star Priya Rai.
-All content is shot exclusively for this site.
-13 1800x1200 solo galleries. 75% portrait, 25% landscape.
-Big 230x185 thumbnails. Pictures also available at 900x600.
-Professional makeup, sexy clothes, nice settings, decent shooting.
-11 1200x720 8000kbps WMV movies: 6 solo, 4 boy-girl, 1 girl-girl.
-No music in videos apart from some occasional short intros.
-Videos also available in flash streaming at 576x324.
-Access to Private Camz shows.
-ccbill. Cheap fully working 3-day trial.
[Current update rate]
-1 new photo gallery or video every week.
-Short diary entries without pictures twice a week.
-First live cam show scheduled on February 23rd.
-List of last updates available in free tour. |
| Cons: |
-Site launched a month ago. Still few content and some design issues left.
-Slow update rate: only 1 photo gallery or video per week.
-No zip file for pictures.
-Pictures are solo only.
-All scheduled updates until April are solo.
-No lower resolution versions of videos available for download.
-She moans too much in videos. Sounds and acts a bit too fake.
-Managed by Aziani but no access to other sites from the company.
-Site design is a bit too plain.
-Interaction is limited to comments in diary entries. Cam shows are coming.
-No behind the scenes content.
-No direct internal messaging to model: Site Admin is the only available recipient. |
| Bottom Line: |
I remember first noticing Priya Rai when she was doing solo softcore stuff. A couple years ago she started doing boy-girl. I might have seen some of the scenes but never been a real fan of hers. The site spiked my curiosity when I saw it had exclusive material and Aziani was involved. The video on the home page where she's seen deepthroating and the trial option closed the sale for me.
Videos look really good. Picture quality is excellent and you get none of that porn music so you can hear the model talk, moan and spit; you can even hear the sound of her vibrators. She usually masturbates with dildos in solo ones. The boy-girl ones attempt to be reality scenes: 3 in a sex therapist series and rewarding a pizza delivery guy. I admit acting is as bad as anywhere else, she moans a bit too much and she has a penchant for spitting which might not be your cup of tea.
As long as they have that trial, I'll recommend it to anyone who's enjoyed watching any of her reality scenes. There are worse ways to spend your money. The main drawback is the slow update rate. It's even worse when you find out they have scheduled releases up to April and they plan on keeping this weekly rate. A solo site that has only one update per week right after its launch is hard to support. I wouldn't recommend staying longer unless you are a real fan and will be able to enjoy the shows or the interaction.
Panties fanatic bottom line: I noticed she was wearing the exact same panties in 3 out of the 8 sets where she does wear panties. It's weird because they pay a lot of attention to makeup, jewel accessories and elaborate wardrobe in general. I also wish there weren't so many panties-less sets: it's weird to see her get out of a business suit or a dress and have no panties on. |
|
02-21-09 01:27pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
324
|
Priya Anjali Rai
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I had been planning to go for the trial for some days and, so far, apart from having only one update per week and the somewhat slow speeds, looks like a pretty decent solo site. I'll probably write a positive review. I've already started to watch the videos and the image quality is excellent.
I didn't find any broken links but there are some bugs in the personalization options and the site design doesn't look totally finished. I believe they just launched, though. It's managed by Aziani; never joined any of their sites but I believe they have a solid reputation, so I suppose they will iron out all glitches sooner than later.
|
02-20-09 02:13pm
|
Reply
325
|
Priya Anjali Rai
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Official Priya Rai site. Just launched. Still some things left to polish. 4.95USD fully working 3-day trial. Diary. First live show next Monday. 13 1200x1800 solo galleries. 10 1200x720 movies: 5 solo, 4 boy-girl, 1 girl-girl. All content seems exclusive. Managed by Aziani. Looks good but it's just starting.
|
02-20-09 09:00am
|
|
