| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Review
I'm almost certain this site doesn't allow you to download any pictures or videos.
I was a member of Miss Laura Lee, another site done with the same content engine (RT Web Designs) and a script blocks all attemps at right-clicking. If you check the free section of Naughty Natalie XOXO, you can see it for yourself: if you right-click on any page, no context menu appears.
|
09-27-08 09:06am
|
Reply
277
|
Naughty Nati
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Review
My guess is that, if she is now known by Allie Sin and has been appearing at various porn sites and DVDs, most likely this site was only active prior to starting her full-fledged porn career. Probably the solo site didn't work as expected and she decided to jump into porn with a new stage name.
In my experience, that's the usual reason why a porn star has a site with a different name.
|
03-04-09 01:47pm
|
Reply
278
|
Next Door Lana
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Great review as usual.
Regarding the zipsets, it's a common feature in most sites in the network and I agree there's little interest in them but for the more devoted fans. You buy them also through ccbill and get a 3-day non-renewing membership to a section where you can download a single zip file.
Take into account, though, that most of the models in the network do very tame stuff and they take it a bit further only in these sets. There's even a model who doesn't pose fully nude but in the zipsets (Flo Jalin). People must be buying them, because there are already 12 sets... I believe the zipsets are as much a way to get extra income as a way to reduce as much as possible the diffusion of those images.
I really like the way the sites in this network are organized. What I like the most is that the sites show in the free tour exactly what you will get when you join. Every site should do that. I see that at Next Door Lana you have to be a member to get past the second page but in the free tour you know anyway the exact count of sets you will get once you join. I agree, though, that video quality could be improved.
As for the webmastering, I have also occasionally found small glitches at other modfx sites (wrong watermarks, dead links) but the webmaster has always solved them and got back to me once notified. You will probably get him to add the missing photoset pretty fast if you contact him.
|
06-01-08 04:26am
|
Comment
279
|
Nicole Graves
(0)
|
|
10-26-08 10:24am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
280
|
Nikki Benz
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks! Sometimes I wish I could be more succint, though :)
Ms. Benz is a favorite of mine too. The site had a trial membership in its previous incarnation but not now. I'll let some time pass so it builds up more exclusive content before joining again. We'll always have Brazzer's Network in the meantime.
|
08-05-08 02:03pm
|
Review
281
|
Nikki Benz
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Official site of Canadian, LA-based porn star Nikki Benz.
-Easy to use; good content categorization.
-175+ video scenes (54 sets), mostly from DVDs. 15 minutes on average.
-Video categories: 65% boy-girl, 20% girl-girl, 15% solo.
-5 thumbnails per video set: nice for single files but not useful for whole movies split in 10 files.
-200+ picture galleries, 80 images per set, zipfiles, dated, picture count stated.
-Photo sets: 30% solo, 30% candids, 20% girlfriends, 10% boy-girl, 10% girl-girl.
-Professional photography, stylism, elaborate settings. A few Matrix HD but others must be exclusive.
-30% of photo sets published in last 6 months. Not all shot recently.
-Cool search function for pictures and videos: clothing type, clothing color and scenario.
-Long blog entries with pictures (1-2 times a week).
-Model is answering all questions members post in the message board.
-Free tour lists most recent updates. Also has a detailed calendar (feature dancing, shoots, travels).
-ccbill. |
| Cons: |
-Low download limit: as soon as you download 1Gbyte, you get blocked for 6 hours.
-Expensive for a solo model site.
-Pictures are somewhat small. 50% are 1200x800; 50% are 1024x700 or lower.
-Most videos are and look very low-resolution. 70% are 320x240 (400kbps), 20% are 512x384 (650kbps).
-All videos but a couple recent ones are non-exclusive (come from DVDs).
-Although, according to Nikki Benz posts in message board, she has shot new content, I was only able catch 1 new video.
-Free tour hints she might do cam shows but she currently doesn't.
-Content from other models is mixed with Nikki Benz-only content and diminishes the good impression of the site.
-For instance, I believe girl-girl scenes without her should be listed under girlfriends category and not girl-girl.
-Album / Favorites is broken: all members probably share the same favorites and thumbnails don't work there. |
| Bottom Line: |
Looks like Nikki Benz recently regained control of her site. I was a member about a year ago and I feel the core video content is still the same, though. Release dates of video updates are most prior to 2007 except for a handful of DVDs that have been posted this year. Recent content this year has consisted mainly of picture sets although I am not sure they were shot recently: Nikki Benz had her boobs redone earlier this year and she is still sporting the "old" ones in these sets. 20+ solo sets (professional / high-end glamour with toys and masturbation) or 20+ candid ones (outings, parties, conventions).
On the other hand, according to her blog, calendar and posts in the message board, she's been shooting new content. I only had time to catch a solo anal masturbation update but it was pretty good: high-end location, good performance, well-lit, decent camera work. It was a 6 minutes 640x480 (4000kbps) WMV file so this will probably the standard for new content that will be released in the immediate future (probably right now).
The tour claims the site has her entire collection of movies. I did some research and there's probably everything she did while under contract with Pleasure Productions (videos from 14 movies here) and Jill Kelly (10). Other videos I could identify were from Zero Tolerance On Demand (5), Diabolic (3), Third Movies / 3rd Degree (3), Wicked Pictures (1) and Vivid (1). According to iafd, she has appeared in 86 titles. The tour also claims that most video content is exclusive. This is also currently not true as these DVDs are the main video content. This will change as the new content is uploaded. As I said, new content looks quite promising.
All in all, I got the impression she is pretty busy (feature dances across the US almost every weekend and shoots adult videos several times a month) but still manages to get back to site members via her blog a couple times a week and reply to all message board questions. Site is updated several times a week with new Nikki Benz content so I really don't see why they also release so many content from other models and mix it with her content. |
|
08-04-08 11:32am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
282
|
Nikki Benz
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Looks like I got it wrong. Sorry about misleading you too :( I asked ccbill and they said that it's a regular monthly membership which you can cancel at any time; "12 times" only means that you would be rebilled UP TO 12 times so you would have to sign up again after one year. Weird rebilling (why not make it just "recurring"?) but not sleazy.
I've edited my initial comment to include ccbill's reply.
As I said in my initial comment, no complaint about the content. I'll add that it's quite well organized. As the rebilling is not a real issue, I'd still recommend it to anyone interested in Nikki Benz.
|
06-06-08 01:57pm
|
Comment
283
|
Nikki Benz
(0)
|
|
06-04-08 01:44pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
284
|
Nikki Jackson
(0)
|
|
09-19-09 03:53am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
285
|
Non-Nude Cams
(0)
|
|
08-14-09 01:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
286
|
Non-Nude Cams
(0)
|
|
01-06-09 01:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
287
|
Nude Adult Cams
(0)
|
|
01-06-09 01:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
288
|
Official Lindsey Strutt
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Official site of gorgeous UK glamour model Lindsey Strutt.
-Great looking all natural model. No tattoos, no piercings.
-Nice choice of clothing, lingerie and accessories.
-Model always ends posing topless. But no full nudity.
-Content looked original and exclusive to me.
-70 image sets. Average 80 images per set. 85% vertical.
-6 sets with Kayleigh Pearson or Staci Noblett. Rest, solo.
-Image sizes: 45% 850x567, 45% 1200x800, 10% 1600x1065.
-30 BTS videos. Specs vary a lot.
-Update schedule shown in a calendar.
-Currently updating photos and videos at these rates:
--1 new photo gallery every 6 days at 1600x1065.
--1 new wmv video every 6 days at 1920x1080 8500 kbps. |
| Cons: |
-No update metadata: no release date, no update name, etc.
-Image galleries are not available to download in zip format.
-Useless image thumbnails: all look either distorted or blurred.
-Inconsistent video formats and file naming.
-Only one format available per video.
-New HD videos are pillarboxed (aka reverse letterboxed).
-No video previews but a single thumbnail in the listing page.
-No interaction at all with the model.
-No webcam chats although announced to start 6 months ago.
-Useless message board: model logged just once to answer.
-Pointless diary option: candid photos with no caption at all.
-No information on who the model is (for those new to her).
-No access to other sites from this company. |
| Bottom Line: |
I came across this site because of the new listings section at The Best Porn. I had never heard of the model and I knew almost nothing about the glamour business in the UK but I liked her looks and decided to take the plunge.
I like the photos. She basically wears either bikinis by the pool or bra and panties indoors. Nice, simple sexy lingerie and none of those pantyhose that seem to be so popular in UK erotica. I cannot say the pictures are technically excellent (I’m not very savvy but I felt there were some lighting issues and too many similar shoots within a set) but, for a change, I enjoyed watching a beautiful woman with a perfect bust posing in sexy lingerie that didn’t make her look too young or too slutty. I don’t mind that she never shows anything below the waist but this could be an issue for some.
Videos, on the other hand, offer little. Leaving aside the fact that there are endless combinations of format (flv, mov, wmv - a couple of them are even offered compressed in RAR format for unknown reasons-), resolution (from as low as 384x288 up to 1920x1080 -but letterboxed from an original in 4:3 format also for unknown reasons-) and bitrate (from FLVs at 200 kbps to MOVs at 30,000 kbps), the ones I managed to play without stuttering on my not-so-old computer were basically 1 minute BTS clips with superimposed music. I believe I’d have gotten a better impression had the site offered no videos at all.
As for the interaction, I came out of the site knowing as little about Lindsey Strutt as before. An “About Me” section explaining who she is would have been welcome for those who are not in the UK. For instance, the diary section had some pictures of her with a bunch of soldiers. Turns out Lindsey Strutt went to Iraq to visit the troops as a spokesperson for UK magazine Nuts but I didn’t learn about it here. There’s no point in offering so many interaction options in the site’s menu (webcam chat, diary, message board) if you then make a half-hearted attempt at it or have an “under construction” sign for a year.
In the end, looking at this and the other site from the same company I checked (Official Staci Noblett, no longer listed here), I’m under the impression the models are more interested in posing for magazines than working for their own site. At least for me, it’s not worth staying a member of a solo site if I don’t feel the girl is a bit involved in it. There are other good looking UK models I’d never heard of who have a site with this company but, given the precedents, I’m afraid I’ll have to pass. |
|
01-30-11 10:11am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
289
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Hidemyass seems to work with the ccbill https sign up page but I'd be very reluctant to try to avoid regional pricing by entering my credit card details via a proxy. The proxy receives the credit card info in clear text and submits it back to ccbill. What assurance do you have they won't steal your info?
|
02-14-10 10:28am
|
Reply
290
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
migyobud's Reply
I did take the plunge at Orgy Max. I agree some sites are great but site structure and navigation was a bit of a let down compared to the major US porn networks.
Regarding ccbill, I've never had any kind of billing issues with them either. I believe Capn was just referring to the fact that ccbill often uses regional pricing aka geo-targeted pricing. No regional pricing on Orgy Max, though.
|
02-05-10 10:31am
|
Reply
291
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
It does work in my little corner of Europe.
|
01-09-10 03:15pm
|
Comment
292
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
|
01-09-10 11:15am
Replies (6)
|
Comment
293
|
Panty Pops
(0)
|
|
05-27-12 02:23am
Replies (0)
|
Review
294
|
Panty Pops
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-USA porn stars trying on panties but rarely having sex.
-Cumshot always on panties/ass/back of model.
-100% exclusive original unique content.
-Some big names, like Courtney Cummz or Jenna Haze (2 scenes).
-Some attempts at reality porn: simple scripts and locations.
-60+ videos. WMV or Quicktime in various resolutions.
-Max resolution: 65% 854x480 2000kbps; 35% 640x480 1000kbps.
-Video length varies a lot: from 4 up to 30 minutes.
-18 photo galleries: 75% 1200x800; 25% 600x400.
-100 pictures on average per set; 50% landscape, 50% portrait.
-Full access to other sites from this company (not updating).
-Free tour lists all updates with release date and trailer.
-ccbill. |
| Cons: |
-Erratic updates: 1 in Jan/09, 1 in Feb/09, 3 in Mar/09.
-Very little pussy penetration: handjob or blowjob at most.
-For a panties site, there's too much emphasis on blowjobs.
-Very few of the models masturbate; lots of panty touching.
-Most scenes are POV; last scene had a cameraman, though.
-Always the same guy; he talks a lot.
-Guy often jerks himself off for a long time to finish scene.
-Not enough panty variety: same panties in some scenes.
-Panties not always match bra; most of the time, no bra at all.
-Regional pricing. |
| Bottom Line: |
I came across Panty Pops while browsing the Panties niche section here. I'll try to join some of the sites but this was the first one, mainly because I knew most of the USA stars, it had a low price and network access. Scenes are always very similar: there's a model and a pile of a dozen panties; she teasingly tries on some of them, following instructions from the guy that is filming her; the guy takes out his cock and some blowjob and cock-panties interaction ensues. Absolutely no penetration except a handful of scenes.
I don't get why there's so little penetration. It's not that the site is deceiving since it's true to its name: the guy eventually pops on the panties and ass, with the model always lying flat on her stomach. It's the fact that all models are seasoned porn stars who have done lots of regular boy-girl scenes. It looks weird to see the guy not pull the panties apart and get down to business. That's what I was hoping to see but it happens in less than 10% of the scenes. On the other hand, almost every scene contains some blowjob. Since this site seems to be a one man job (performing, filming, editing, etc), I couldn't help but think it is just an excuse for this guy to enjoy some quality time with a few USA porn stars. Are blowjob-only rates lower?
Another thing I found weird was the panties reuse from scene to scene. Looks like the guy buys them by the dozen at Victoria's Secret (lots have the Pink collection logo) but he makes them last for several scenes; many of them are tried on by 4 or 5 different models. It looks cheap since they are probably bought for less than 5 USD each; it also brings a sense of déja vu. Models must have some panties of their own: why not ask the models to bring them on set and try them on camera? That would bring a higher variety of panties to the scenes and they may also have matching bras.
Despite its shortcomings, I feel the content is very unique, the cast is often stellar and it's more than decently produced and packaged to recommend it to anyone interested in this niche. Don't expect much from the other sites in the network: they are no longer updating; there were also a couple more sites that have been taken down and are not accessible any more. |
|
04-04-09 10:51am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
295
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Just saw your reply. Thanks indeed for the heads up and the informative review.
|
09-23-12 10:17am
|
Reply
296
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
Gasperdian's Reply
When I wrote that comment I was surprised that PornPros Network decided to go with such a copy of another site. I agree this shooting style gets repetitive. What's worse here is that they have thrown out the window the spirit of their existing sites and now they all look the same bland style, regardless it's Deep Throat Love, Disgraced 18 or any other.
|
07-22-12 11:22am
|
Reply
297
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
astonman's Reply
Thanks indeed for the prompt reply. Most likely those 18 scenes are all the ones also available on Porn Pros Network in the new shooting style. Having them as an alternative shooting style on Porn Pros Network is a nice bonus but this separate site seems to be just an attempt to cash in some money by pretending to be who they are not.
|
01-20-12 01:29pm
|
Reply
298
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
astonman's Comment
If you were a member recently, could you tell more or less how many scenes are available inside the members area?
I wonder whether Passion HD gets you access to all Porn Pros Network scenes or only to those in this new shooting style. Thanks in advance.
|
01-20-12 11:05am
|
Comment
299
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
|
01-17-12 11:31am
Replies (3)
|
Review
300
|
Planet Anita
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Official site of US-resident, Hungarian adult model Anita Dark.
- Site has been running for about 10 years.
- Free section shows exactly what you’ll get inside.
- All updates are dated.
- Newest videos (10%) at 800x452, WMV, 1000kbps.
- Content categorized in solo, girl-girl, boy-girl. Further subdivisions.
- Schedule of upcoming photo sets and videos.
- Still one of the most beautiful women in porn.
- ccbill. |
| Cons: |
- Low quality in old videos: 1-2 minute 320x240 MOVs.
- Very small images : 99% at 800x535.
- No Zip files for images.
- Other models’ sets mixed with Anita Dark’s (specially in boy-girl).
- Membership doesn’t grant you additional interaction with model.
- Looks like interaction was much better in the past.
- Latest sets often consist of self-shot fixed-camera pictures.
- No webcam chats for members.
- No access to the other site from this company: Anita’s Angels.
- Regional pricing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the official site of Anita Dark, an Hungarian adult model that has been working in solo and girl-girl porn in the US for a long time but who got started in porn doing boy-girl in Europe more than 10 years ago. She has had this site for around 10 years.
Updates have been coming throughout these 10 years so there’s a lot of it even though most content shows its age mainly due to its very low resolutions. There are hundreds of videos but those released up until recently are almost unwatchable at present due to its tiny 320x240 size. This is specially harsh in her old boy-girl scenes, available in 1-2 minute segments in mov format at a very low bitrate. You get about 40 boy-girl scenes, though. On a side note, she’s currently doing boy-girl cam shows at Streamate.com on a regular basis.
Video quality has improved recently (around 30 videos at 800x452); short 3-4 minutes videos, mainly fixed camera strip teases indoors or BTS of outdoors shoots, also fixed camera. Not the best lighting conditions and techno music throughout so nothing spectacular. Pictures resolution hasn’t improved and everything is still 800x535.
Interaction with Anita Dark through the site is currently almost non-existent: no forum, no webcam chats, no blog. Free section has a very generic news section (Happy Easter, Merry Christmas, etc) and lists her personal email although an inquiry I made to it while being a member wasn’t answered. I feel members webcam chat would be pretty easy to set up. It’s funny that she’s pretty active on twitter, often promoting her site, but there’s no link here to her twitter account.
A couple years ago, I reviewed Club Anita and mentioned that, comparing Club Anita’s update list with the free section of Planet Anita, it looked like Club Anita had the same content as Planet Anita but was being released at a later time. The thing is, around Christmas, I found a very recent-looking sample Christmas-themed gallery of Club Anita which wasn’t available here, neither as a previous year update. Planet Anita is the site Anita Dark is promoting as her official site but I really don’t know which of the two sites is better to get the most recent content of Anita Dark and at the best resolution. |
|
06-05-11 05:57am
Replies (1)
|
|
