Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1101
|
iFriends
(0)
|
Reply of
polacrilex's Review
I loved your direct and to the point "pros." There are naked women. Priceless.
More importantly I really appreciate the details and the heads up about the rip-off of this site. One of the biggest benefits of this site (Porn Users) is how it helps all of us avoid the bull shit that is out there.
Thanks polacrilex for a great job.
|
10-09-09 03:33pm
|
Reply
1102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I agree. It's creepy, because it suggests that the porn user feels a personal connection with the babe on the screen. Frankly I feel a bit of pity for the poor guy who sees the girl on a pay site in a social light.
A bigger question for me is whether the comments are ever given to the babes. Especially those that are less than nice such as those picking on phony tits, too many ripples in the tummy, etc.
|
10-09-09 12:35pm
|
Reply
1103
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Reply
Fancy that. I am amazed at the DDFBusty site which I joined during their promotional deal. The number of beautiful babes with outstanding figures and superb natural titties on that site is incredibly huge.
I remain a member of Brazzers...for now...but I am thinking about saving the money and moving on. Sounds like I need to start the cancel process early to get it done and over with.
|
10-08-09 10:38am
|
Reply
1104
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Review
The babes on this site must have used up the world's supply of silicone. Almost all of the big titters have had aftermarket enhancements. For me seeing a 36DD doing the deed reverse cowgirl style does my heart and other body parts good, but seeing the mammaries not move at all as the babe bounces on the rod is rather unappealing.
Brazzers has a few models with nice soft big naturals, but there's not enough of them.
|
10-07-09 09:00pm
|
Reply
1105
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Reply
I agree. RagingBuddhist writes terrific reviews in a very easy to read manner. I've been hanging on this site (on my futures list) because of price and will now hang patiently a little longer. Hopefully someone (Webmaster?) who can do something about the search and D/L issues in the near future.
|
10-04-09 09:08am
|
Reply
1106
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
Hustler's Reply
Thanks for helping me to decide not to sign up for Hustler. Your offer to Nick was encouraging but your failure to work with him convinced me that I should try another site.
|
10-03-09 04:25pm
|
Reply
1107
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Nxn's Review
Thanks for your review.
I was a member two or three years ago when the site was encumbered by DRM but it had some great exclusive stuff. But I lost interest when other sites with no DRM had great content at a lower price so I canceled.
I just thought I'd check the site again and it was totally changed.
Thanks for your heads up.
|
10-03-09 04:24pm
|
Reply
1108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Frankly I don't get why there's any interest at all in anime pornography. But whatever floats your boat, as they say.
|
10-03-09 09:06am
|
Reply
1109
|
Pornstar Classics
(0)
|
Reply of
Harley Girl's Reply
Thanks for adding your comments. This review plus your clear interest in customer satisfaction and the discount all prompted me to sign up. It's been less than a day but, in general, I'm liking what I'm seeing so far.
I will take advantage of your offer to be contacted privately with my comments and observations as I get more familiar with the site but the one thing mentioned in the original review that could use some work is the identification of the talent, both in the videos and especially in the scenes.
The site has an excellent variety of material that I'm very happy to have access to in a digital format to the point that I can start weeding out some of my old VHS tapes.
|
10-02-09 08:08am
|
Reply
1110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Poll
"Young," to me, is a girl who looks like a fresh college girl who is not much older than 24 or 25. I like 'em natural and with no, or incidental, tats but not these huge scrawling tattoos.
|
10-01-09 12:33am
|
Reply
1111
|
Victoria Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
The site has a 7 day trial available for $1.00. Unlimited access. But you must access VictoriaPink.com directly and not through PU to get that price.
They redesigned the home page so I hoped that, perhaps, they might have added more material on Victoria Pink.
Nope. Same old crap with no updates in at least 3 years.
However the site has added several additional sites as bonus sites (all titled [something] Next Door - such as Virgins Next Door, Handjob Next Door, etc.) that show dates that suggest they are updated relatively currently. The bad news is that they download at the rate of about 140 Kb and are the usual unimaginative crap.
I downloaded what little I found any good (a decent, but not spectacular Bree Olson video, for example) and cancelled my trial about 2 hours after signing up.
Warning. Cross sells. Warning. $40.00 if you don't cancel before time runs out. Good news, billing by ccbill.
I gave the site a 64 a few years back but now it gets a 50.
|
09-30-09 11:10pm
|
Reply
1112
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Reply
Got it. 90 to me is spot on. At least at this point in my membership. Clearly theirs is a different niche than, say, Bang Bros or Brazzers, but they are, IMO quite superior to, say, Danni.com.
|
09-26-09 02:47pm
|
Reply
1113
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Not only a 1TB, but maybe 2 or 3. Or more.
I signed up using the three month network option that was offered in August and I just can't find the time to D/L all of the superb content I've found on this and the other sites.
A HUGE uptick for the quality of the babes and the videos they've made.
It's too early for me to write a review but I'm a notch higher than an 85...but not a lot of notches.
|
09-26-09 11:55am
|
Reply
1114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
As with any group there are some bad apples, but by and large they are busting their butt and doing good.
The process is that the girls must buy their way into the club and by doing so get an opportunity to make tip money showing off their remarkable assets.
It's a cash cow for both the club owner and the girls so by and large the bad apples are screwing the pooch if they are doing anything they shouldn't be doing.
If the question is a moral/social question rather than an integrity/honesty question, then I'll simply ask if the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders are doing wrong when they wear their "eyepatch sized" shorts and wiggle their assets for a national TV audience?
|
09-26-09 11:52am
|
Reply
1115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mbaya's Poll
If I pay a premium for access to HD where a single video can approach 2 Gb (today, who knows what it'll be in the next year or two) I want a much higher limit.
I agree that the idea of limits is reasonable, but the limit must be set high enough to provide the subscriber with the product (s)he has paid for.
My answer is 20Gb for a standard quality offering and 40Gb for HD offerings, but that's not available, so I answered 20Gb.
|
09-19-09 08:53am
|
Reply
1116
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
I just went to the site and they still want $14.95. What is the "student discount?" I couldn't find it mentioned anywhere.
|
09-14-09 08:39am
|
Reply
1117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
The improvements are excellent and the Porn Users adjunct just makes this the best source of good information for us porndogs.
I've said frequently that PU and TBP together are the Consumer Reports of the Porn Biz.
|
09-13-09 11:12am
|
Reply
1118
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Thanks for the tip. I will give it a go. I dropped $74.95 on the deal because there's so damned much GOOD content there's no way I can D/L what I want in just one month, and it is over my budget to spend $34.95 a month on just one of the sites.
I'm guessing (hoping) they get smart at DDF Prod and offer network deals in the future as well.
So far I'm also impressed with the quality of the vids. The older ones are not so good but anything 2007 and later are great.
|
08-30-09 06:59pm
|
Reply
1119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I agree with Drooler. The screaming in porn is almost as bad as the shrieking that goes on in Women's professional tennis. It's unnecessary and a ridiculous waste of energy.
|
08-30-09 01:24pm
|
Comment
1120
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
|
08-30-09 08:30am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1121
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I read 'em all while waiting for the D/L to complete. Some for entertainment, some for information and some for specific data that I want to include in my summary comments (which I prepare for each down load).
The summary lists the model name, possible/likely aliases, saved file name, source site, my personal rating and why, and other comments and narrative.
|
08-27-09 02:02pm
|
Reply
1122
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
With the popularity of the main site and the marketing efforts they continue to employ, All these guys need to do is to clean up their navigation and naming conventions.
I'm ready to volunteer to do the naming project.
|
08-22-09 01:00pm
|
Reply
1123
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
chancler's Review
That happened to me (expired cc). I called the 800 number of their billing service. They told me to sign up for the $5 trial with the new credit card and immediately sign up from the trial, while I was on the line with her. She said she would set it up at the $9.95 rate. I got the 3 days and am back on the $9.95 rate.
Seems like a silly procedure but it worked fine.
|
08-21-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
1124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I don't care. There are gorgeous 22 year olds and ugly as sin underdeveloped young girls who can pass for under 20.
|
08-18-09 11:27pm
|
Reply
1125
|
N/A
|
Reply of
dracken's Poll
Ditto...all of the above.
My list in order of frustration (high to low):
-Lousy data in general such as no model names, no scene names, etc.
-Lousy navigation where one cannot find new posts, posts by model name, etc.
-Broken links to content
-Slow downloads
-Video identifications that are meaningless
The only thing in the list that I don't worry about is color themes. I prefer subtle to garish, but I don't really care much so long as the babes are doing what I want them to do.
|
08-16-09 09:26am
|