You said "ok, who needs a video with 2GB on his hd?"
I agree completely.
I am about to spring $30 (USD) for a month of Prime Cups and went in to the public site just to see if anything has changed. I tested the super HD (1920) test run that used up 15.8 mb for about 25 seconds...and although the picture was crisp and nice, the 960 version of the test was virtually the same on my screen, yet it used "only" 5.6 mb (65% less). Then I tried the 640 version and it came in at a paltry 3.0 mb. And it was damned good as well.
The difference, to me, isn't sufficiently large enough to warrant the lost hard drive space. (After all, only a breast research doctor or a gynecologist may need better definition than you get with 640, IMO.)
I plan to sign up and do a full drain of the pre-identified "good stuff" on the site (anyone can get a full index of all Dev8 stuff at Indexxxed.com . so I've already D/L'd the trailers for each and every video on that site and know which scenes I'll want to D/L once I've signed up.)
By the way, I sent an email to Dev8 asking if there was any less expensive way to access all their stuff like a network pass or something. They referred me to their site called More Gonzo. That site has an inventory of 120 videos from 6 of their 10 sites, total. As they add a new (to this site) video they remove an old one. At any given time they will have 20 older videos from each of their six big and established sites...but nothing from their newer sites, PurePOV, Fist Flush, Milf Thing and FistFlush.
With daily updates (except Sunday), then, one can, with proper planning, drain off 144 videos (the 120 on the sight at signup date and 24 daily updates) in a month and then quit...or just stay enrolled and, if they play it straight, eventually get access to most of their overall inventory.
More Gonzo is probably a good site for a starter to see what the full videos are like in the 6 sites covered (the trial provides access to very short videos so you'll never see an entire video without signing up for a full month)
The answer to my question now appears on the public site. They hold to an inventory of 120 videos, total. As they add a new one (to this site) they remove the old one. At any given time they will have 20 older videos from each of 6 sites...but nothing from their newer sites, PurePOV, Fist Flush, Milf Thing and FistFlush.
With daily updates (except Sunday), then, one can, with proper planning, drain off 144 videos (the 120 on the sight at signup date and 24 daily updates) in a month and then quit...or just stay enrolled and, if they play it straight, eventually get access to everything.
More Gonzo is probably a good site for a starter to see what the full videos are like in the 6 sites covered (the trial is a very limited video so you'll never see an entire video without signing up for a full month)
I like girls of any age who have taken care of themselves, aren't extensively tattooed and who have great attitudes.
And the ones with great eyes and other body parts!
For example, I go nutz over the older types like Vicky Vette and Penny Porsche...and over young babes like Natasha Nice and Jenna Doll. (And I like their names as well. Classic cars and "nice dolls" always do it for me.
Thanks for the tip. The public site is very nicely structured and it has some stuff not available on VideoBox. I especially like that it lets the casual drop-in lurker operate all of the functions (except watching the videos, of course) so an interested purchaser can be sure he is satisfied. That's rare in most preview sites.
However, the bad news. They didn't try very hard to identify the talent so one cannot do complete searches by model name. This shows a sign of laziness because they display the cast on the cover.
The good news, for what it's worth, they say they have 844 DVD's (20% of VideoBox's inventory) so searching through each and every box cover won't be as bad.
At $15 bucks (w/ the PU/TBP discount) it's worth going in to supplement my collection (which is organized by model name) with otherwise unavailable stuff. I see what my wekend project will be already.
This review brings back memories, and not fond ones, of the early days of what looked like great material on sites with lousy D/L speed. I'm spoiled these days and sites that get cheap on the delivery side of the business will have wasted their money building the content side because no one will buy, or if they do they won't stick around.
Your reference to your being a moderator of a Psychological forum on the web prompted me to add a new thread in the PU Forum: The Psychology of Porn - Actresses. I'd appreciate reading your thoughts on the subject.
I checked out the site and it's my guess that the $4,95 was a typobecause of the sperial $14,95 TBP price.
The site permits nonmembers full access to the navigation and scene details which I really like, But the one annoyance I have with Video Box occurs on this site even more, and that is the large number of cases where the porn star name is "not available." While in some cases that can be true because the producer does not make them available, there are so many missing names that the search feature is of marginal value.
That means a serious collector has to go to another source (iafd.com, for example) to get a listing of all titles in which a porn star appears, then go back to this site and do a title search.
At $14.95 I can't complain and will probably sign up to grab a few scenes missing from my collection from Video Box and other sources that look like are in the A.M.C. collection.
I have Big Naturals on my A list of sites that I'm signing up for when I cancel my membership in a current site. The PU reviews are great and I like the public site.
Just to let folks know, the network is Brazzers.com. I'm a current member and agree with much/most of the review. My only beef is that many of the current updates of this and other network sites are babes with oversized aftermarket boob enhancements. I'm an "all natural" kind of guy. That said, this is a very good site that has, in my opinion, overtaken Bang Bros. in its genre.
The bad part is that I suspect it can get rather nasty when dealing with content providers unless I'm creating my own content, and the process for establishing good contact development must be difficult. In other words, it takes a lot of hard work and one must be ready for the crap that must go on behind the scenes, but once established, the notion of making a nice buck and having access to all manner of stuff is attractive.
Thanks for this review! Well done. I hadn't heard of this site until your review today so I checked it out (no pun intended).
First things first. Boy, the gene pool in Eastern Europe is just wonderful when it produces so many fine, innocent looking and just gorgeous women.
Now, after checking out some of the sample videos, the reproduction quality isn't up to current standards. If the site has been stagnant for a year or two, I suspect the member access videos are equally not as crisp and sharp as they could be. Am I right?
Also, based on your comments and what I saw in the samplers, the content could be described as a bit edgier than what is on Met-Art.com (where several of the models can be found in shoots and videos that are less erotic than the ones on this site).
I'm tempted to sign up for a month and, as you did, drain off as much as I can, then cancel.
Thanks for finding this site and for your review.
By the way, for you Silvia Saint fans out there, on page 5 of the models directory there is a small set and a sample video of the Saint herself when she was very young. Take the time to check it out.
Just found this out with the Twisty's review. I've been holding off signing up again (had a 10 month membership in late 2006 for $99 before they dropped that deal) but with the three bonus sites and the PU/TBP $19.99 price, I'm in. Too bad they dropped the $99 for 10 month deal, but the 6 month price is still pretty good.
I found TBP quite a while ago and used it always before signing up. On the few occasions where I signed up on a site not reviewed by TBP, I was disappointed.
When PU was set up, it only added to the mix because I am now able to carefully evaluate a site knowing what I can expect.
PU also provides a great way to warn others when a lousy site or rip-off wembaster practices are discovered.
The two resources are must reads before I'll even think about a site.
As a previous subscriber and a subscriber to their free newsletter I received an email from Met-Art offering a $19.99 per month deal. I don't think the price is available to "walk-ins."
But if this genre is your thing, they have a $99.99 per year deal which is a Helluva deal in comparison to the month-to-month price ($8.33 per month). After 3-1/2 months you get the rest of the year free.
Bottom line, I've taken advantage of several TBP/PU discount offers and all, except Bang Bros, have been honored as offered and all of them were really good deals.
And the folks at TBP/PU immediately pulled the offer as soon as I reported it.
Finally, BangBros belatedly extended my full price membership to make up for the matter.
So I lost nothing except a few minutes of time posting these messages. I suggest staying on top of any deals and squawking immediately if you run into any snags.
Your score doesn't match what I'll score it when I've finished my review, but you did an excellent job of explaining why you scored it as you did which, if always done the way you did, adds a lot to the value of P. U. reviews.
I, personally, like a variety of insertions, because that means the girl is enjoying herself, showing off her body and giving me a good opportunity to enjoy looking at her private parts.
While fornication is also fun to watch, seeing a hairy male asshole staring back at me while his sausage is doing its thing in the babe's vagina or butt hole, does nothing at all for me.
That said, each of us has our individual preferences. I really am turned off by excessive and/or poorly located tattoos (example, a lousily oriented script "F" on Friday's lower groin area). I just cannot watch a porn vid with excessive tat's for more than a minute. But some people love tat's.
Your experience with ALS Scans matches mine for an all tattoo site I wasted my money on. The site had good PU reviews and a high average score but it took me about an hour after signing up to put through the cancellation.
It's all about what floats your boat and when people post good descriptive reviews like yours, it really helps the decision process.
OK. Based on your reply I signed up for a 3 day shot at $5.
A quick run through and a successful download of two otherwise unavailable Christoph videos downloaded at "wicked" resolution - which isn't quite HD but pretty damned good) has convinced me that you are dead bang right. I'll be busy for the next few days exploring the site and doing some downloading, but this one looks great.
Jay, thanks a million. First, I would never check out a site like this that has such misleading stuff, and second, I'm not into Gangbang videos.
The webmaster needs work on how to market his site, but I agree with you. At $40 for 2 months it's a Hell of a deal.
I'll be canceling my trial on Monday, then will sign up for the 2 month gig.
Again, thanks Jay, and thanks PU for providing such a useful site.
You say this is part of the Evil Angel network, but when I go to Evil Angel using the autolink in your review, they want $14.99 for a 30-day license for each video. The same results for EvilEmpire.com
Based on your comments I'm ready to pop $40 for 2 months, but I don't want to pay $15 more for each download and the GangbangPlayground.com says nothing about that subject.
Also, in GangbangPlayground.com's signup page the other 20 sites are listed but they aren't linked, and a search yields nothing.
I am a big fan of Christoph Clark whose "Big Natural Tits" is listed in the "other 20 sites"
Are they real "sites" or are they just sections of this website?
Frankly I am really into masturbation videos in a big way. I enjoy watching babes doing themselves with whatever is available including baseball bats, pool cues, panties, dildos, cucumbers, zucchinis, carrots, pearl necklaces, even fingers. Babes who are into self pleasuring sure beats the Hell out of looking up a guy's butt while he's doing the dirty.
And you know it's much more healthy for the babes if the objet's d'penetration are fresh veggies and not some tattooed dude's sausage because no STD's can be transmitted via a celery stick.
Oh? What's that? You say the question is about men jerking off? Sorry.
On that note, I have been told about pretty good sites by people on here rather than reading a review I will have someone actually suggest a site, Aniazi.com for example.
I'll betcha you meant Aziani.com. And that is a good site!
Because you refined the question so that nit includes any website, I changed my vote to Often.
I keep a small pad in my wallet where I jot down sites mentioned by colleagues and friends, that I see published in newspapers and magazines, and that are mentioned on radio and TV. I also check out links mentioned here on Porn Users, some of which (porn and non-porn) have been most useful.
This network of sites renames some of their girls for reasons I know not. However, the network hosts this FREE site: http://www.indexxxed.com which summarizes a lot of things including on which of its 10 sites a specific girl appears.
I'm still waiting for these guys to offer a multi-site access package of some kind. The previews are terrific and they seem to do a great job finding the right babes to do their thing.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
