| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1501
|
YouStrip
(0)
|
Reply of
njolin's Reply
Thanks. Maybe someday a download capability will come along, but at their prtice, storing the videos of interest as favorites will be fine.
Interesting site. Thanks.
|
06-02-08 07:04am
|
Reply
1502
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
But men should also have the right to stare at their unadorned mammaries without fear of being accused of molestation or any other crime.
|
06-02-08 12:13am
|
Reply
1503
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Northern Pike's Review
Once again I call for PU to start listing all sites with known cases of scam billing like this. At least a caution list of some kind is called for. It would be a tremendous positive feature in PU.
|
06-01-08 11:33am
|
Reply
1504
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think Hillary would be most likely because the feminists view porn as misogynist exploitation of women and are the leaders at attempts to close or restrict porn shops and "gentlemens' clubs" in most cities.
Obama is my second choice because he has shown a preference for government controls over almost everything.
McCain is least likely to meddle in that arena because his base really doesn't care that much about passive issues like porn (on the web, in clubs or in stores). His base is much more interested in activist issues such as teaching condom use to 3rd graders, encouraging gay studies for 6th graders, bans on gay marriage, etc.
By the way, it's a real kick to see political philosophies being argued when the question was a very simple one about who would most likely restrict porn.
|
05-31-08 12:47pm
|
Reply
1505
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Thanks. Interesting site...for sure. And his success at communicating with the webmaster has me thinking about doing a lot more myself.
|
05-30-08 08:36pm
|
Reply
1506
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
joekerr1's Review
I agree. This is the kind of review that adds to the quality of PU and I'm looking forward to seeing more of your reviews going forward.
As for Video Box, I've been with them for at least 2 years and agree with both you and Denner. There is no site that has more stuff and as frequent an update schedule than these guys (imagine, 1,825 updates per year).
My primary beef with that site (and with many porn video productions in general) is that many of the girls are not identified at all so the search function will not capture all scenes for a particular babe. My secondary beef is that they are getting careless when they do identify the chick so that the name and scene don't match correctly.
Minor issues because it's fun digging thru the archives looking at the stuff and always finding some stunning talent that I haven't seen before.
And the comments for each scene/DVD are amusing, and occasionally useful. Always watch for comments by Rope-a-Dope. This guy has an all consuming passion for porn and seems to have cataloged each and every porn flick ever made...and he's always posting great info.
|
05-30-08 01:07pm
|
Reply
1507
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
"Even better was/is the correspondence with the Crazies who run AO30."
What's AO30?
|
05-30-08 12:54pm
|
Reply
1508
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If the site has a public forum that is read by the webmaster I'll post a lot of suggestions and comments, but otherwide I seldom do. But it may be a good new habit to get into. Feedback can't hurt!
|
05-29-08 07:02am
|
Reply
1509
|
YouStrip
(0)
|
Reply of
njolin's Review
Very interesting site...a new find for me. I assume that there is no way to expand the videos to full screen or to download any of them, but if there is could you post the method?
Also, what does Xtra buy you? The vids I found are all about 1 minute long and stop before the panties come off. Does Xtra go the "full monty" as they say?
|
05-28-08 09:49am
|
Reply
1510
|
All Elite Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
bjorn7's Reply
Yet another direct scam.
When will PU start a warn list of sites known to be scams...just like this one?
|
05-27-08 08:34am
|
Reply
1511
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
My activity on Porn sites began in 2002, and the volume of spam back then was rather high already, but has increased over the past few years.
I can't correlate the spam traffic to joined sites so the increase could just be more spammers out there. But yes, spam has risen dramatically.
|
05-27-08 06:58am
|
Reply
1512
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
The choices are so simple I always pick the one that matches my actual reason. Can't hurt.
Apart from "Just moving on," my usual reply, I've also clicked download problems and quality problems, if those answers apply.
Danni.com asked these questions when I cancelled in 2006 and I answered "support problems." I got an email from someone asking for more info, so I responded hoping they would pay attention and possibly even get a free month. Instead I got a very defensive and insulting reply from them.
Strange. With the big bucks that can be made with good sites and good customer service it seems like some webmasters are thick and stupid.
|
05-25-08 07:35am
|
Reply
1513
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Did . Don't now. Waste of time.
|
05-21-08 08:18am
|
Reply
1514
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
I like the idea, but not as a replacement of my day job.
I can just see that entry on my resume:
Professional Porn Reviewer - Wrote comprehensive reviews of pornographic websites. Have an extensive database of various sexual activities that I have explored and evaluated as an observer but have only fantasized about doing personally. Have earned more positive trust ratings than negative ratings from Porn Users.
|
05-19-08 12:29pm
|
Reply
1515
|
All Internal
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Although I have yet to invest in any of Dev8's sites, reviews like this one have me saving up to give one or more of them a go. I just wish these folks would network some or all of their sites...even if at a higher price.
In case you're interested, here's a free site that's updated every week and has short but excellent previews of every video in their 10 (separate) websites. Indexxxed
|
05-18-08 11:32pm
|
Reply
1516
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
blaze588's Review
Ditto on the back up suggestion.
Once again, I would like to see PU create a list of all sites that have serious issues like this and/or where the site is a rip-off.
|
05-18-08 07:15am
|
Reply
1517
|
DVD Store
(0)
|
Reply of
feemstd's Comment
I've often wondered if that could happen. Hasn't to me but I believe it's just a matter of time.
That's why I use one credit card for all online porn sites and had the limit set at $80 so that any attempt to blow a lot of charges through would be stopped by the credit limit.
I use my bank's bill pay facility to pay for each charge when it appears so that I won't hit my limit with legitimate charges. (My monthly budget is $60.)
|
05-14-08 08:15am
|
Reply
1518
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Poll
Imteresting perspectives so far, Drooler's is from the delivery method perspective and Goldfish's is from a content standpoint.
In my opinion, the 1970's and 1980's had some wonderful talent and the babes had perrsonalities and a reasonable degree of acting capabilities. They even faked orgasms better.
Who can forget T J Sparxx, Christy Canyon, Aja (what a terrific sense of humor she had), Traci Lords, Amber Lynn, Ginger Lynn (no relation), Seka, Juliette Anderson (Aunt Peg), Angel (oh, what a babe), Desiree Cousteau and my all time favorite, Nancy Suiter.
Can anyone name any of today's porn stars who could deliver real lines, not just moans and "Oooh! Fuck me! Yesss!" etc.?
And the good old days where we'd either watch the entire movie and anticipate the "good scenes" or wear out the fast forward button on the VCR's remote.
And when you had that "taste of the forbidden fruit" feeling while watching a porn (or going to a Pussycat Theatre to see porn) instead of having it instantly available.
Nostalgia is always fun. Thanks for asking this question.
|
05-13-08 06:58am
|
Reply
1519
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I agree with Drooler. There is the initial rush when even I, a weathered old porn fan from the good old pre pubic hair in Playboy days, get a charge out of some heretofore undiscovered babe on a site that seems to overflow with great stuff.
My rule is that a site that looks great and gets a bunch of good reviews goes into my favorites file on PU while I have a 5 day cooling off period. I may check out the site during the period but I won't sign up. After a week if I still have the site on my mind I'll take the plunge and sign up.
As for reviews, I don't feel that I can write an objective review unless and until I have become thoroughly familiar with a site and am willing to renew, or because it's so light in content or poorly managed that I have decided that the site is not worth renewing.
|
05-12-08 08:11am
|
Reply
1520
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Comment
I totally agree. The videos on Met-Art are awful in many respects; especially that most are merely videos of photo shoots with nothing at all enjoyable about them.
The trend at Met-Art is moving toward more suggestive (sexy) poses away from just figure model poses in various stages of dress but they haven't moved into any insertions of any kind nor have males ever made it into any of their content.
The superior photography and the superior beauty of the models has been enough to maintain this site's success, but it will have to move out of the 20th Century soft core suggestive stuff a' la Playboy to a recognition of the models' sensuality.
|
05-11-08 10:29am
|
Reply
1521
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
The score is extremely important. The variance among scores is also extremely important. If one PU scores a site a 50 and another a 95, there's a reason for concern. If there are several scores all clustered closely, the likelihood is that the site is as scored.
But the score must also be coupled with reviews and comments, especially where a problem of some kind may exit. See, for example, the discussions about IncrediblePass.com.
I would like PU to request that the scoring criteria used by TBP also be used by the PU members who write reviews. https://www.thebestporn.com/criteria.html
|
05-11-08 09:54am
|
Reply
1522
|
N/A
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Poll
How about the Olsen triplets, Mary-Kate, Ashley and Bree Olsen?
Now there's something that would get ol' Willy to come to full attention!
|
05-09-08 08:57am
|
Reply
1523
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
nickdv's Review
I really would like TBP to create a warning list of some kind based on this sort of problem.
|
05-07-08 07:30am
|
Reply
1524
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mrcallen's Poll
I'm with JB. If I am familiar with the arranger and/or the other participants, I might consider saying yes. But other than that my first reaction would be no.
Now if Natasha Nice or Gianna Michaels were there, ain't no way I would ever say no. I might be smothered to death by those four fabulous funbags, but what a way to go!!!!
|
05-05-08 12:01pm
|
Reply
1525
|
Club Anita
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, but not all of the "Company Sites" are necessarily part of a subscription to one of the sites.
Example - Membership to GlamourModelsGoneBad does not give you access to their Shay Laren site.
Example - GiveMePink is affiliated with many other sites (see indexxxed.com to see the closest this Company comes to cross pollination of its sites).
|
05-05-08 08:29am
|
