| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1526
|
Club Anita
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
Can you list the other sites that you get access to in addition to Glamour Models Gone Bad?
|
05-04-08 11:04am
|
Reply
1527
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Andy makes my point. If a collection like this had a contact name easily visible, my suspicious mind would kick in and wonder if it was a set-up of some kind.
I would call the number very cautiously and do some verbal dancing to be sure it's a legitimate "If Found Please Call" note.
But if there is doubt, I will only go as far as reasonable to track down the owner. Then it becomes a "good find."
|
05-02-08 09:58am
|
Reply
1528
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
As they used to say to those of us not as "well endowed" as the sperm jockeys in porn, size isn't everything; technique matters too.
A 30 minute non-stop blow job, a 15 minute solo strip tease or a 10 minute RCG (reverse cowgirl), which one gets more of a rise out of ol' Willy?
Give me a 5 minute scene with a super hot babe with a super nasty attitude over a mechanical pneumatic 30 minute BJ any day.
That said, all else being equal, the longer the scene the better.
|
04-30-08 07:29am
|
Comment
1529
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
|
04-28-08 02:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1530
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
This thread is great with all the terrific reference sites mentioned so far. I'll add one more, iafd.com.
|
04-27-08 05:34pm
|
Reply
1531
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Needless to say, I agree totally with Andy. (We posted simultaneously. Brilliant minds and all that.)
|
04-27-08 09:32am
|
Reply
1532
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Generic last names are annoying and can create confusion, but not as annoying or confusing as the single name babes.
It annoys the Hell out of me when a site identifies a babe by just her first name and the name is not a weird concoction that is capable of a web search. I'm sure there's a reason for this, like the site has no idea what her name really is, but when I see a babe I like, I want a unique name for reference.
BTW, I agree with Toadsith's idea.
|
04-27-08 09:26am
|
Reply
1533
|
X Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Reply
Thanks for your compliments.
ZTOD has, I understand, exclusives from Zero Tolerance. That's a big plus for ZTOD, which I have yet to join. The DRM kept me away, and now the price. And the slow D/L speed that you mentioned in your review isn't too appealing either.
The price concessions occurred over a few months. I signed up at the TBP discount for a month, then the "please stay" rate when I canceled the original membership. At $9.99, I decided to hold on for another few months, then decided the redundancy with VideoBox, with its much larger inventory, made no sense.
So I canceled again, and this time was offered the $5.99 price which I accepted and have continued as a member. For 20 cents a day, 1/2 the cost of a first class stamp, I figured that there was no need to cancel.
However I find that, by and large, the redundancy is almost total; I usually can find the same stuff on X Movies already posted on VideoBox. The only benefit to continuing X Movies, if it is a benefit, is that X Movies offers IPOD, MPEG and WMV formats where VideoBox offers only WMV. In two or three cases I've used X Movies D/L for a DVD that didn't load properly on VideoBox.
One last point. In a few cases where X Movies has a DVD that is not on VideoBox, X Movies offers streaming only, no D/L. VideoBox has streaming but always permits full downloads of everything on its site.
Summary. If you sign up at $19.99, cancel in 2 or 3 weeks, and you should get the $9.99 deal. Then stick around for another month and cancel again and you should then get the $5.99 deal.
|
04-25-08 05:16pm
|
Reply
1534
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Danni sold her interest in the site in 2006. Until then it was a great site with a lot of personality. The live cam stuff was great and the members could chat with each other and with the models.
The big problem was that they had a modified DRM on their stuff. In theory if you D/L a video as a member and you left it on the same drive (not a CD or DVD) that you downloaded it to, you could view the vid even after you dropped your membership.
Before Danni sold the site, the support staff was always fast at fixing the many, many problems this system created. After she left, I'm convinced they fired the entire support staff. Two years later I still have several open "tickets" that no one has addressed.
I have continuing very negative feelings about the site, the worthlessness of their "Danni's pledge" and the 100 +/- Gigs of downloaded stuff that has filled up an external hard drive.
|
04-25-08 12:47pm
|
Reply
1535
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Let's look at this analytically. The operating costs of a website are small relative to the fixed costs. (Variable costs are those that change based on the volume of business and fixed costs are the same regardless of the volume of business.)
The variable costs are the upload bandwidth and the credit card discounts. The fixed costs are the content development and maintenance costs.
That means most of the price of membership flows to the site's profits (bottom line) so the site that you wouldn't join at $29.99 but will join at $19.99 using the TBP discount yields close to $18.00 in profits, which would not be there without the discount.
|
04-24-08 05:50pm
|
Reply
1536
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler sez:
"As for their zip files of their dinky little 1067 pixel photos, I could suggest some rather creative backup storage options."
I didn't know you were into anal, Drooler! ;-)
|
04-24-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
1537
|
Flower Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Ace - I like your review. Short, sweet and to the point.
Messmer - I feel the same way. If they can't do a good job on the promotional side, it's not likely the full product will be any better.
Denner - Maybe there should be a method to keep track of what has been saved by using member reviews like this and a "MVPU" (Most Valuable Porn User) prize awarded each year.
|
04-24-08 08:48am
|
Reply
1538
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I admit I'm a sucker for a deal. When there's a site that I'm jazzed about based on PU reviews and I see a special discount, I sign up. The best part is that the discount usually holds past the first month making the savings really significant.
|
04-23-08 08:25am
|
Reply
1539
|
I Love Andie
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Yet another reason to resubscribe to FTV Girls and Twistys. Thanks for the info., atrapat. I appreciate it.
|
04-21-08 11:32am
|
Reply
1540
|
I Love Andie
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
Thanks for a great review. I really was thinking about this site but based on the "tour" it looked rather skimpy as you just confirmed. But I haven't seen Andie on any other site. Can you give us a few of the other sites?
|
04-21-08 10:16am
|
Reply
1541
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Sorry, but I'm confused.
I thought Ginger was played by Tina Louise and was the glamour girl; and Mary Anne was played by Dawn Wells, the cute girl next door type. I got my rox off with Tina Louise back in the day.
|
04-21-08 10:09am
|
Reply
1542
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
I've got to say that, while it seems like a minor deal, this is still first class treatment and tells me, someone who has never heard of the sight until now, that this is an honest site with excellent business practices.
|
04-19-08 10:21pm
|
Reply
1543
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Ambiguous question. I RESIDE in California but I LIVE in Paris.
|
04-17-08 08:18am
|
Reply
1544
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
DrKnockers's Reply
Nothing at all.
On 6 April, I used the TBP link to Bang Bros. The sign-up screen showed the $14.95 "special discount" price, so I signed up and started surfing their site. At no time did Bang Bros. advise me that the price I would be charged would be $23.95.
On 9 April, when I checked my Master Card account on line I saw that the charge came in at $23.95. That's when I communicated with Bang Bros. who denied any knowledge at all of the discount and of TBP. They refused to honor the discount.
Then on 9 April I sent an eMail to Khan, (PornUsers.com Sr Admin) which he quickly acknowledged receiving, but I have heard nothing back from him over the past week.
What concerns me is the credibility of TBP's discounts. There's really no way to determine their authenticity until the actual charge appears on a credit card and there's no way to cancel the charge once it has been made. It suggests that you should probably be willing to accept the full subscription price if the advertised TBP price is not honored by a site. And if the full price is too much, simply ignore the offer.
In fairness, I've successfully used the TBP discount on other occasions so I suspect this is a Bang Bros. issue, not a TBP issue. But not having heard anything from Khan other than the acknowledgment, I can add nothing to my initial comments.
EDIT: I see that Khan posted an update today. However my suggestion still stands. If TBP offers a discount and the site does not honor it (as was the case with Bang Bros.) there's nothing that can be done after the fact except to accept the full charge. So it looks like TBP discounts should be viewed as possibilities, not promises.
|
04-16-08 11:22am
|
Reply
1545
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Good review. The videos are well done and worth joining up, but the photos are as you say, not erotic at all.
|
04-14-08 05:05pm
|
Reply
1546
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Andy, I understand yoiur point but I must disagree. Churches aren't into being anti-porn activists unless it directly impacts their operation...such as a porn shop with a hawker peddling to church goers on Sunday morning.
The people we need to be watching out for are those who are into governmental involvement in everything. Here in LA, for example, the government dictates just about everything we say and do, from the bags we use in the grocery to what can be carried on cable to how porn shops can sell and how their fronts can be displayed (nothing can be seen from the street except a small sign that just names the shop, not what they sell).
And this is LA, the home of the Porn industry and the moral relativist Liberals who condone murder convicts to go free to save money but condemn porn shops.
And yes. Even here in LA there is a substantial risk that our all Liberal city and county gummints will tax internet porn. It will start with their Sales Tax proposal (8.25% on all website subscriptions) but once the revenue starts, watch out.
The church folks in LA have no interest in this subject.
|
04-13-08 05:35pm
|
Reply
1547
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I used to do it (a few times) for sites that I had joined before joining PU and really remembered little except my overall impression.
I don't think just a rating without a review tells anyone a lot. A low rating deserves a stated reason (even a comment would do). Otherwise how is a member supposed to use a low rating in his consideration of a site?
|
04-11-08 07:53am
|
Comment
1548
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
|
04-09-08 12:35pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
1549
|
Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Review
Frankly if you are a member of the network, this addition is really superfluous because they (Brazzers) do a great job of combining all their sites in their index...and there's no benefit to joining just this one site (not sure if you even can). That makes this site more of a reason to load yet more content, A GOOD THING!
That said, The volume of updates on Brazzers is mind boggling. These guys must have a huge member base to be able to afford the volume and frequency of the high quality exclusive content they offer.
|
04-08-08 11:22am
|
Reply
1550
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Poll
Whatever she wants. The act of fisting does nothing for me (I prefer the basic fingering where I get some tactile pleasure as well) but if it floats her boat, that's fine with me.
I do enjoy watching fisting on videos when the babe clearly enjoys it and would probably enjoy giving my babe that enjoyment as well.
|
04-07-08 08:43am
|
