| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1151
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
The clue to what is on my desktop wallpaper is in the little quotation at the bottom of my posts.
|
07-12-13 03:22am
|
Reply
1152
|
Brandi Love
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
My pleasure. I'll await your review to see what you thought of the site.
|
07-12-13 03:21am
|
Reply
1153
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I don't know if you are aware but Pierre has a forum where he is an active participant. His English is not the greatest but I've never had any problems understanding what he meant to write.
I checked out what was written in the forum on Leylou. There is a lot of back and forth between him and the different poster and the most recent info is that she is a sex slave to a bunch of lesbians and that he will never work for her.
|
07-11-13 06:27pm
|
Reply
1154
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I don't know if I try to be different and maybe that's impossible for me since I have stolen the styles of other reviewers but I do like to add a perspective that I didn't see in the other reviews
|
07-11-13 02:28pm
|
Reply
1155
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another excellent review full of pertinent information. I don't know if you noticed but Pierre has been adding scenes of his WUNF to this site. Now I don't know if this is because he wants to increase the traffic to this site and/or improve interest in wake up n fuck. I hope it's that because one of my fears is that he is slowly starting to run out of new stuff and is using the WUNF stuff as filler. I really hope that I'm wrong because it will be a sad day when Pierre stops making porn. His movies made Private the company that it once was.
|
07-10-13 06:39pm
|
Reply
1156
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It's usually the bottom line because I try to incorporate parts of the pros and cons into it but don't want to repeat myself. I also want to offer as much information as possible in as few words as possible. I find that I tend to rattle on and that doesn't make for a good review.
|
07-10-13 06:31pm
|
Reply
1157
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I think porn performers names are suppose to be the name of your first pet and the street you lived on as a child. Now I don't know if this is only for the women and I frankly can't remember the name of my first pet but how about Rex Bellevue.
|
07-08-13 03:26am
|
Reply
1158
|
Brandi Love
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
I think the fact that you can't download any of the pics as a single zip file is enough of an annoyance that it's probably better that the pics aren't all that good. I think I'd be even more pissed if I had to download them one by one.
|
07-08-13 03:23am
|
Reply
1159
|
Brandi Love
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I used the 3 day trial and you get full access as stated in the TBP review. It's only 5$ so even if it's crappy then it doesn't hurt as much.
|
07-07-13 06:28pm
|
Review
1160
|
Brandi Love
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Exclusif site of Brandi Love.
+460 videos of which 250 are of Brandi herself.
+Over a 1000 photosets of which 650 are of Brandi.
+You get some content from 20 other models.
+There are plenty of links for swingers.
+You can get a full access 3 day trial for 5$.
+The CC processor is Epoch(so cancellation was easy). |
| Cons: |
-Overall site design is really bad (see bottom line for more info).
-A pretty large percentage of the content is not exclusif and that includes Brandi's stuff.
-A couple of the videos are interviews and/or tv appearances.
-A good portion of the content is rather old.
-The video quality is on the poor side, some of them have pretty bad lighting and way too much is POV style.
-Photosets cannot be downloaded as a single zip file so you have to download them pic by pic. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I've been tempted to join this site for quite a long time but for some reason I never did and after joining then I know why I waited so long. Now it's quite possible that my expectations were too high or maybe it's my standards but I don't understand how this site can score in the 80's. There are so many things wrong that it's hard to find the positive.
*I have to start somewhere so here goes. The most obvious one is that this site doesn't know what it wants to be. Is it a swinger site that just happens to also have some solo model content or is it a solo model site that wants to promote a swinger lifestyle. If it's the first then why charge any money? If it's the other than why have so much of the site cluttered with swinger info? There are so many swinger related links and third party advertising that you almost wonder why they even bothered adding the solo model stuff. There is so much content on each pages that you have to scroll down to actually see it all and one way too many of them it requires you to scroll quite a distance down.
*Then there's the fact that there isn't really all that much content. I mean this site has been active since 2004 and Brandi has only 250 or so videos. That comes out to about 2 per month. Many of the videos are taken from shoots Brandi did for other studios so not exclusive and a portion is mostly solo cam stuff. There are videos from other models but again you have non-exclsuive content and most if not all is quite old.
*Some of the videos have tag words attached to them but there is no search box to use those keywords and clicking on them does not actually bring you to the proper results.
*There is a blog section but it's so seldom used that it borders on the ridiculous. I mean there are only 4 post this year and it's basically advertising for her appearances at strip clubs and possible ways for guys to meet her in private.
**I'm glad some people enjoyed her site but I didn't. I can only recommend this to fans of Brandi who want to get as much as possible from her and don't necessarily want to join other sites to get access to their content of Brandi. |
|
07-06-13 10:47am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
1161
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Always for mine and almost always for anybody elses
|
07-06-13 07:39am
|
Reply
1162
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I only buy online porn now but that's in large part because the studios whose movies I enjoy have great sites. It's been over a year since I bought a porn dvd from a major studio. I did buy 2 dvd's from a solo models site but these were so bad that I wish I hadn't done that.
I am considering buying a couple of dvd's in the weeks to come. There are still some studios who do not have an online studio.
|
07-04-13 02:43pm
|
Reply
1163
|
Anal Pantyhose
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The good news is that most if not all of the performers that appear on this site also appear on the other anal themed sites within the Ferro network. You are better off joining one of those sites. The way Ferro seems to work is that they film scenes with a certain fetish in mind and then release the scene in a particular site tagged with that fetish. They have multiple nylon sites but only one that also has anal and vice versa they have a few anal themed sites but only one where the women wear nylon during the scene.
|
07-02-13 06:43pm
|
Reply
1164
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm pretty much on the same page as Monahan.
|
07-02-13 03:30pm
|
Review
1165
|
Anal Pantyhose
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Full access 3 day trial for 8$
+A nice selection of Eastern European models.
+Content is dated and they add one new scene per week.
+There are 165 videos which can be viewed online of downloaded a single file. Resolution is 640x480.
+There are 236 photo sets which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution seems to be 1024x768 for all pics. |
| Cons: |
-They update with one scene per week but it's either a video file or a photo file so you never actually get both at the same time. Actually it's more common to get only one type of file.
-Some of the models have multiple scenes butthey are all with the same male talent.
-There are two seperate watermarks on the videos. One of the top left of the screen and one on the bottom right.
-The videos are a little grainy and lighting is sometimes an issue.
-The makeup on some of the models does not enhance their appearance but makes them look less appealing than they are.
-Videos are quite short since they rarely get above 15 minutes and many are below that.
-There is a search by model name but you actually get the names of the models for all Ferro sites and not just this one.
(cons continued below) |
| Bottom Line: |
(cons continue)
-There is a useless search box where you can enter a model's name and find all her videos or photosets based on the different Ferro sites but you can do the same by simply searching through the models page.
-You can only download 3 videos at the same time.
-The names of the model are not the ones they are known elsewhere on the net.
Bottom Line:
*This is not a bad site but only if you are taking the trial membership. Otherwise I think most people will be disapointed. The overall site design looks dated and could use a facelift. This is nothing new since the site looks about the same as it was when I was last a member a few years ago.
*The premise for the all the scenes is basically that females wear pantyhose and have anal sex. The bulk of the scenes are b/g but there are a couple of g/g scenes with toys or strapons.
*I was actually quite surprised to see that the videos are all quite grainy which is unusual since I have plenty of videos at 640x480 resolution and they don't have that grainy look to them. That mes a lower resolution video look worse than it should. When you add the two large watermarks on oppostite sides of the screen then you compound the problem. At least if they had picked some more discreet ones then I might not be as annoyed with them but these aren't small or discreet.
**I guess if you aren't too picky about video quality and you have 10$ floating in your pocket then you could give this site a try.** |
|
06-30-13 11:18am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1166
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I picked go for both because more info is never a bad thing when talking about new sites. Especially new sites because they are an unknown commodity.
Decent reviews on TBP and/or PU doesn't mean that I will join if the site's preview sections is crappy.
Crappy previews don't always equal crappy sites but they often do.
|
06-30-13 07:31am
|
Reply
1167
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Reply
You are correct my membership ended two days ago. I don't want to argue because you are right in regards to pics. It's just that this is not a mostly only video site but an only video site that also just happens to have some pics. The pics are now and always were filler.
No one should ever join this site for the pics because they are going to be very disappointed.
|
06-29-13 07:55pm
|
Reply
1168
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Reply
I'm sorry you feel that way but if you cancelled your membership to a video site because they have less than stellar pics then it's your loss. This site was never advertised as having great pics since they are a video only company. As I stated in my previous post. The photos are mostly bonus. I don't know how long you have been surfing for porn or if you have ever bought porn dvd's but 15$ is almost half the price it cost you to buy just one EA dvd and you get hundreds for that price.
|
06-29-13 06:36pm
|
Reply
1169
|
MetArt Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
I agree with you that the cost is a little high but seeing as these are all top notch sites then that shouldn't be an issue for people looking for a good deal. The time needed to surf all these sites is a bigger hurtle and one that might make some hesitate joining.
Another problem and possibly the biggest one is that the although all the sites are top notch. Is there really a lot of variation from one of these erotic photography sites to the others in the network? If there isn't and most of the women appearing on one of the sites also appears on the others than all you are getting is more of the same. The only one that seems to distinguish itself from the others is sexart but that is because it's more midcore to hardcore than the others and may not appeal to fans of the other sites.
|
06-29-13 09:51am
|
Reply
1170
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
saVa631's Comment
I'll avoid discussing bonus sites and subscription and instead write about what I can confirm. I am a current YLP member and I got access to 8 other sites with my membership. I could be wrong but I believe that 6 of those sites are now dead since they are no longer updating with new content. Both YLP and 18 Only Girls contain a fairly large amount of leased material that can be found on a few sites. That is not necessarily a problem if you have never joined those sites but I have so that drastically reduces the amount of content that I will download from this network. Here are the 8 extra sites you get with your YLP membership.
18 only girls, alice wonder bang, ivana fukalot, skinny super girl, beata porn, sasha blond, Natasha shy and vika nymph
|
06-28-13 05:43pm
|
Reply
1171
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Comment
I know this probably sucks for pic fans but the reality is that this is primarily a video site. It's a nice bonus that they offer some photos but I would never join if that's what I was hoping to get because you will be very disappointed.
|
06-28-13 05:23pm
|
Reply
1172
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It varies a lot but the one constant is that if a site is really bad then I will cancel almost right away for fear that I might forget and then feel even dumber than I already do when I get a rebill.
|
06-28-13 02:40pm
|
Reply
1173
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
stingerxxx's Reply
I checked the review mbaya did in 09 and he mentioned that the number of scenes was 100 but that TBP's review claimed there were 139. His reason as to why some of them were removed made sense. Based on that info then I think most of the old scenes are still there. At least those that were of good enough quality to bring back.
|
06-28-13 02:38pm
|
Reply
1174
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Comment
I'm not going to defend them because there is no defense for why they allow that kind of language to be used. I will only say that this is not a really new trend because I have seen similar language used on other forums and comment sections for quite a few years now. The only question I've ever had is what kind of creature are you to use such vile words to describe young women?
|
06-26-13 08:50pm
|
Reply
1175
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No and that's because I think that crappy porn is not any better when it's in 3D. I use the same rule for mainstream movies and I've yet to be proven wrong.
|
06-26-13 02:41pm
|
