| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1301
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The bulk of their content is exclusif.
+You get to see an excellent selection of young hot looking Eastern European models have hardcore sex.
+All content is dated and they appear to upload with a new scene every 2-3 days.
+You can download the videos in various resolutions from 640x480 to at least 1280x720 for the videos dated from 2006 to now.
+They now also offer true HD resolution 1920x1080 (approximately 150).
+All scenes have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Best reolution is 2000x1300.
+They do an excellent job of tagging their scenes with multiple keywords.
+The ability to select the sites language out of 6 possible choices. |
| Cons: |
-The date on the content is often misleading because they use remastered scenes as new content.
-I'm also pretty sure that they use content from some of their other sites to fill this site's library.
-Some of the scenes could use better lighting and better camera work.
-The porn is rather repetitive and editing is not very good.
-The older videos are split into multiple clips. |
| Bottom Line: |
*There is very little that DDF does wrong so it's no surprise that this site is so good. Their selection of models includes many of the top Eastern European models of the last 10 years and most of them either have hardcore b/g, g/g, b/b/g or g/g/b sex or all of them.
*They do such a good job at tagging their scenes and there are so many keywords attached to them that it's easy to find all of the ones that include a specific fetish, body shape or hair color.
**The one negative thing and this is common for many Eastern European sites and it is that the scenes tend to lack imagination. Too many of the them look like paint by the number porn where there is no variation and little imagination. I also found that the editing is badly done so that there is no natural transition from one shot to the next.
**This is an excellent site but since the cost of the network is so close to this site then it's probably better to join the ddf network for a couple of dollars more and get access to so much more content. |
|
03-23-13 05:32pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1302
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I was on the fence with this because I wasn't sure if I should pick waste of time or depends on the model. I settled on waste of time because I find that too many of them are BS interviews where the questions and answers seem fake.
|
03-22-13 03:35am
|
Reply
1303
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
If there is then I have never seen it and I have downloaded at least 90% of their content. I think that might be something they do for their trailers.
|
03-21-13 06:36pm
|
Reply
1304
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
I'm sure VB is well aware that studio output of new movies has been dropping for the last 3-4 years and therefore other sources had to be found but I don't think that this is the main reason why they are adding older titles to their library. I think that although you may not like those older titles. Many members probably do and they have been asking VB to add them. I know that new stuff is nice to look at but a lot of older stuff is better(at least to me).
|
03-20-13 05:24pm
|
Reply
1305
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I find that pregnant women have a certain look to them that is attractive but not in a sexual way. I'm probably not saying it the right way but maybe you understand what I mean. That said I have no desire to see them nude or have sex.
|
03-20-13 05:12pm
|
Reply
1306
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
There is not a single site owned by these crooks that is worth it. I know because I joined a couple of them last year and they are so bad that 50 is still too high a score.
|
03-18-13 06:38pm
|
Reply
1307
|
Plumper Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
This is a very small niche type of porn so variety may be a big problem for them. The fact that a lot of the content is older makes sense since the more popular types of porn started suffereing a few years ago so any kind of porn with a smaller fan base would have suffered faster and harder than the other types.
|
03-17-13 05:27pm
|
Reply
1308
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
Anth's Comment
I don't know if the error messages you got were a glitch or they were trying to trick you but I tend to lean toward a glitch since you were offered a one month membership at a reduced cost when you could have cancelled the trial. The sad part for you is that if you had simply used the TBP/PU link then you would have gotten a 1 month membership for 20$ instead of 25$ or in your case 26$ since you paid a 1$ for the trial as well.
P.S: I don't know if you read any of the reviews prior to trying the site but if you didn't then let me give you a small piece of advice. Please do so in the futur because you will save yourself some money and a lot of headache. If you hade checked TBP's review of the site then you would have seen that the trial is very limited and it tells you what you get with the trial membership.
|
03-17-13 09:45am
|
Reply
1309
|
Whoring Out My Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
You can bitch plenty because whether you're getting robbed 5$ or 20$ the faxct remains that you got robbed. I don't know how much it cost me but I think it was 20$ and I didn't even get single video or photoshoot for my money. It was crap all the way.
|
03-17-13 09:36am
|
Reply
1310
|
Catie Minx
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
I checked her site out and also her blog site and here is what I can tell you.
1-She is a cam model first so be advised that you will probably get bombarded with offers to see her do cam shows. I seems that you get access to some weekly free cam chats but you'll still have to pay to see some action.
2-This is a really hot looking girl who once had great small breasts. She is still hot looking but she recently got implants.
3-There is so little to see in her preview sections that you really don't know what your money will get you.
4-There are no update schedules anywhere so who knows how old the content is. I can confirm based on Freeone that she has been doing cam stuff since 2011 and by default some of the stuff on her preview sections has to be older thana few months since she now has implants and nowhere do you see that.
**It's your money so you can do what you want with it but I wouldn't touch this site even if it was half the price it is. It is afterall 30$ so that is very high for solo model site.**
|
03-17-13 05:37am
|
Review
1311
|
Kelly Madison
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+There are so many photosets that I couldn't count them all but there are at least 2500 that star Kelly and countless more that star a variety of different models.
+All the photosets can be donwloaded as a single zip file. The resolution varies from set to set but 1728x1152 is common.
+The videos and photosets are a mixture of b/g, g/g and solo sex scenes, some glamour shots and a variety of other types.
+There is a rather small logo located on the top left of the screen which I found easy to overlook.
+You can get a full access 3 dat trial for 9$ so a real bargain |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con against the site is in regards to desgn.
1-A 1/4 of the screens are used up by a blue background that serves no purpose and limits the viewing options.
2-There is a search window to find content but there are only a few pre-selected keywords and the same scene will come up under more than one of those words.
3-The only way to know what is inside the videos is if you go through the pic section.
-Many of the videos are broken into 2 or more clips/sections.
-Kelly only has b/g sex with her husband(not a con for me but maybe for others).
-There are multplie phototsets and videos of other female performers but no search options so you have to go page by page to find the ones you want. |
| Bottom Line: |
*The first thing I noticed when I got on the site is how badly designed it is and how different it looks from the preview sections. That was quite a shock for me because Kelly's other two sites which are Porn Fidelity and Teen Fidelity are some amazing sites that I was sure her's would be just as good. It isn't and that is too bad because there is some excellent content here and Kelly is one hot looking 40+ years old woman with large all natural breast and an amazing sexual appetite.
*I don't know if they plan on improving the site but if they aren't then they really should. It's not like they don't already have two great sites to use as template. Even some some basic tweaking would be an improvement. Especially if they fix that stupid 1/4 section of the screen wasted on a blue background and also if they work on the video setion of the site.
*This is an easy site to recomment to anyone who thinks Kelly is hot and is more into sofcore to midcore porn and can overlook the design.
*You may want to avoide joining if you are only interested in kelly's hardcore scenes because you may be disapointed. There is some great stuff but maybe not enough to satisfy your needs. |
|
03-16-13 10:11am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1312
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't know the number exactly but I don't think it's much more than about 30%. Mind you I'm sure I spend more than 50% on some days but those are the rare ones. I would love it if I had to surf more than 30% because that would mean there is so much new and great stuff that I need more time but that isn't these case.
|
03-16-13 09:13am
|
Reply
1313
|
Whoring Out My Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
I wouldn't join this site if it was only a 1$ because I made the mistake of joining a couple of their other sites last year and that was a huge mistake. The previews looked okay but that was not representative of what was inside the members section. Bad doesn't even cover it.
I looked at a couple of the videos on this site and they look to be at least 5 to 10 years old(closer to 10) and the quality was subpar at best.
Now I don't know if you are saying that all the movies are broken into 1 minute segments but if that is the case then you will have to download a lot of segments to get just a 15 minute scene. Just that should teell you that you are going to regret spending any amount on this site.
|
03-15-13 03:57pm
|
Reply
1314
|
Anabolic.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rawx's Comment
O don't think you will ever find any of their content in HD because it was never filmed in HD in the first place. That's not to say that you can't get some decent resolution but it won't really be true HD.
Mind you TBP gave this site a 68% in their review so why would anyone want to join it?
|
03-12-13 06:22pm
|
Reply
1315
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
All of the above but I find that women who are in their mid 20's and up tend to be more fun to watch than there younger counterpart.
|
03-12-13 06:19pm
|
Reply
1316
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I don't think this site or VB will ever be able to satisfy cystomer desire for HD porn because the bulk of their content was made prior to that type of video resolution. They will add more as time goes by but most of them are still using past porn to fill their library as opposed to newer stuff so it will take years before there is a huge amount of HD.
|
03-11-13 01:51pm
|
Reply
1317
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
I find that her other site is even more of a scam because you can't download anything. I don't agree with sites that offer streaming only of their videos but I at least understand why they do this but I really don't understand why you would prevent paying members the ability to download the photosets. She appears to still be doing cam shows but I'm not sure if they are only for ehr site or if she freelances on other sites. She is quite active on Twitter.
|
03-10-13 07:50am
|
Reply
1318
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I tend to always come twice a day if only because I will post something continue surfing and then come back to see if there was a reply.
|
03-10-13 07:02am
|
Reply
1319
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
The only reason I called it a scam is because there is so little HC on this site that almost everyone joining will feel cheated since this is suppose to be her HC site. This is compounded by the fact that she has a few other softcore sites so unless someone sees your review prior to joining then they will rightly assume that Ann is doing only HC stuff on this site.
That's not to say that a few months or a year from now that the site won't be full of HC porn but that won't help all the people who like you joined expecting some HC porn from a favorite girl.
|
03-10-13 05:37am
|
Review
1320
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The bulk of the content is exclusif.
+They have 209 scenes and they add one new scene each week.
+These guys still manage to get the first anal from some really hot Eastern European girls.
+The scenes are well lit, well shot and offer a variety of angles in which to see the action.
+Videos can be downloaded in 3 versions from 580x328 1000kbps, 800x450 2500kbps and 1280x720 4000kbps.
+They offer photosets of all the scenes and these can be downloaded as a single zip file. The resolution varies from 680x1024 up to 1280x854.
+You get access to 4 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-The only bonus site with any kind of decent content is double view casting but the content and performers are almsot all the same as FAQ so you aren't really getting anything different.
-The other bonus sites have very little content and most of it was not of any interest to me.
-Some of the older content doesn't appears to be exclusif. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is a site that I keep joining because they are one of the few Eastern European site that doesn't seem to have any problem finding new girls willing to do anal. It also doesn't hurt that they shoot some really great scenes and tend to avoid doing circus acts. Now that's not to say that verything is perfect because sometimes there is very little heat between the players but I find that those are on the rare side.
*This site's name tells you everything you need to know about the content so if you want to see young hot Eastern European women have anal sex than you have to join this site. You can visit the bonus sites but I don't know if you will download a lot of the content on these sites. I know that I only downloaded a couple.
**The bonus sites are:
Double View casting: This is basically the same type of anal themed porn as FAQ except that you can download a special viewer which then allows you to view the action from two different angle. The downside is that you have to also download the two version of the same scene to be able to do that and that will eat up a lot of Gig space rather quickly. There are 83 scenes which are dated and they update with about 1-2 new scenes per month.
Jizz on teens: This is basically a two girl on one guy oral sex themed site. Content is not dated but based on the performer for some of the more recent stuff then they are still updating. I' just can't say how often and what the amount is. There are only 24 scenes.
Fuck N Drive: This is basically a site where the girls have sex near, on or inside somekind of vehicle. There are 35 scenes on the site and they were updating wih one new scene about once a month but the last update was in January.
Wanted GFS: This appears to be a mostly photoset only site where the content is largely softcore with some mild midcore as well. I didn't recognize all the girls but some are professional performers. Content is not dated so no way of knowing if and when they update. There are over 210 sets at the moment.
**I increased my score vs my last review by two because these guys have managed to stay on track with their update and they have also managed to introduce so many new girls to us.** |
|
03-09-13 08:57pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1321
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
Thanks for the review.
If I read your review correctly then her site is pretty much a scam since she hasn't actually done any hardcore sex yet. She may have done some midcore stuff but that is not the same thing at all.
|
03-09-13 06:48pm
|
Reply
1322
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
It's not only how they present it but the way they keep shooting the scenes so badly. I don't even think that it's lack of talent but an actual desire to shoot the scenes in that way.
|
03-09-13 06:14pm
|
Reply
1323
|
Who Is Nexxxt
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
TBP says the site has been online since 2004 but they have never updated the info since the beginning(first warning), they don't plan to ever review it(second warning) and there is no actual preview on the site itself(third warning). I'd say that this is a strike out and a clear indication that you are more than likely going to regret your decision to join 1 minute after you enter the members section.
I'd also like to add that I recognize quite a few of the women on the main page and many of them stopped doing porn years ago.
|
03-09-13 08:53am
|
Reply
1324
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Another excellent review and I see that you and I are on the same page with this site. This is truly one of the more annoying sites that I have ever joined because you know they could do so much more and/or do it better. I don't know if it's a lack of talent or worse a lack of interest but it isn't a site that I plan on joining again simply because the videos are just too frustrating to watch.
|
03-09-13 08:41am
|
Reply
1325
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
If you think she is hot then visit her store and buy one or more of her movies. You won't get a discount but I have already explained that the discount is only good if you buy a lot of movies.
|
03-08-13 08:58am
|
