| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1326
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I completely agree with you. I've rarely had to deal with webmasters
but if they start to use every possible excuse to justify what I consider to be bad business decisions or practices and/or treat me like some piece of crap then they can kiss my money goodbye because I will never spend another penny on any of their products.
|
03-08-13 08:22am
|
Reply
1327
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think that they haven't really changed anything since day one and maybe they get just enough people to join to make it worthwhile to keep it as is. If you are a fan of Janet and plan on buyng many of her movies than joining the site is more than worth it because you get a 20% discount on her movies. Sadly that's not the case for me.
|
03-07-13 06:24pm
|
Reply
1328
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I have also been a fan of Janet for a long time and that is why I decided to finally try her site. I don't know if it took me more than 4 minutes to regret my decision but I do know that I knew I was in trouble the moment I visited her video section and download a couple of clips.
I can at least take comfort in the fact that the site has a more recent review and maybe people who were thinking of joining will now change their mind.
|
03-07-13 06:18pm
|
Reply
1329
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
She's a hot looking woman but her site isn't. I agree that 5$ would be a decent price to join because you would get your money back with buying just one movie and come out a winner with anything above that.
|
03-07-13 06:12pm
|
Reply
1330
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I agree that the price is on the high side but hopefully they use a lot of their profits to find more movies to add to their library. It is a pretty nice library but there are so many greta movies that srtill need to be discovered.
|
03-07-13 06:10pm
|
Review
1331
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif.
+You get a discount in Janet's store for her dvd's and other articles.
+The site is still updating(more or less).
+You have about 170 different video scenes.
+This is the only place where you can see Janet do anal or a dp. |
| Cons: |
-Most of the videos are broken into 2 or more clips and way too many of them have 4 clips and more.
-The photosets are mostly stills from the videos and they are also broken into 2 or more sets. Not to mention that you can't actually download them as a single zip file.
-Navigation basically consist of choosing video page, photo page or store page and then scrolling up or down those pages to see what's on them.
-There is no page break on the video page so you have to scroll a very long way up or down to see all of the available videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Janet is a hot red head older woman who simply loves hardcore interracial sex and creampies but unless you want to download most of her videos in multiple clips then you are mostly going to be joining this site to get the discount in her store.
*You would think that anyone who has a personal site would actually have some personal stuff in it but this where you would be very wrong. This is basically a promotional site where you get to sample what is available in Janet's store. That would be fine if the site was free but it is 25$ to join and the only advantage is that you can download her videos in multiple clip format and where the older stuff looks awfull. You don't even get the chance to download complete photosets.
*I wish I could say that there is one single thing that makes joining this site worthwhile but I honestly can't. The 20% off her dvd's is not bad but unless you plan on buying more than 5 dvd's than it's cheaper to simply go on the guest part of her site and purchase her dvd's for 25$ instead of 20$.
*I can't really recommend this site to anyone except anyone that falls under the above comment* |
|
03-06-13 06:45pm
Replies (9)
|
Reply
1332
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I had to pick other because it usually takes me a lot longer than a few days before I decide to join a site. Mind you it wasn't that long ago that I was quite impulsive but I always seemeds to regret my decision.
|
03-06-13 06:23pm
|
Reply
1333
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
My idea of stag films are low quality mini films with no sound. The precursor to what is now called gonzo porn.
Yeah it would be great if someone had tought to keep copies of those great early porn films. You won't really see many here. The best you will see is one that is an average quality print but that is fine with me.
|
03-05-13 06:31pm
|
Review
1334
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to some very rare content.
+They update with 2 new movies every day.
+Their offer movies not only from the US but France, Germany and Italy as well.
+Some of their Foreign movies are not dubbed into English but in their original language.
+They have small bio's of both the male and female performers with a link to their movies on the site and also to a dvd site where you can buy some of the dvd's.
+They have some third party advertising but it is usually quite small and rarely located where you can see it without looking for it.
-They offer some pics of the stars but don't expect much. |
| Cons: |
-Video quality is rather poor to horrible on a lot of their movies.
-They offer you access to 3 other sites but one has the same stuff as this site, one is mostly stag films and one is gay porn.
-Some of the movies may be made in the US but the copy they have is their European versions so the dialogue is not in English.
-They have a search by keyword but I would avoid it as most of the movies are not properly tagged.
-The navigation is basically choosing a page and then skipping to the next one.
-Some movies are split into many scenes while others are whole. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is possibly one of the most bittersweet sites that I have ever joined in large part because I love so much of the content and yet really dislike the fact that the quality of the print is so poor that it borders on the unwatchable on many of the titles. Mind you that is not that unusual since the bulk of the content offered by this site is 20 years or older.
*The first and most important thing is that the guys behind this site need to start looking for better copies of their movies and/or try to remaster them to improve the quality. I don't expect that any of the movies will ever make it much above average but that would be more than fine with me as I'm not interested in HD quality anyway.
*The second thing is that they start looking for more titles from their featured stars so that we get access to a wider choice of movies from them. Of course this may be almost impossible to do because there may truly be no copies left anywhere. I hope that this isn't the case because there are many movies that were so amazing that they again deserve to see the light of day.
**I don't know to whom this site will appeal to except people like me who are nostalgic for golden age porn and can overlook flaws in the quality of those videos.
**My score has a lot less to do with quality and more to do with the rarity of the content offered by this site |
|
03-03-13 09:15am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
1335
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Poll
I've nevr used them but I must confess that I am also curious to know hoe they work. Not enough to actually try them myself because that might not be a very smart thing to do.
|
03-02-13 06:36am
|
Reply
1336
|
Cassandra Calogera
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
I don't know if you are aware but she retired from porn at least 2 years ago. She sort of left the door open for a possible return but most people felt that she wouldn't be back. I like most of the girls in the network but most of them have been gone from porn for many years so I know trhat i would only be paying for older stuff and for some of them some really old stuff.
|
02-28-13 06:34pm
|
Reply
1337
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't know if age as anything to do with it but I am a huge fan of them. You don't see them all that often now so anyone not a fan has very little to complain about. I tend to agree with Droller on one thing and it is that not every girl will look good with them. My preference is for girls with smaller breast because there is a nice contrast between the place she wore her bathing suit and the exposed skin. I think the most recent gilr I say with tan lines was Jessie Rogers when she first came in the industry. Sadly it did not take her long to get implants so I never really got a chace to really appreciate her tan lines.
|
02-26-13 06:01pm
|
Reply
1338
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It's a little worse than the scenes start to look the same because frankly most of them usually do that anyway. No what I meant to say is that you now get about 2 or more almost identical scenes with the same girl and often the same guy(s) doing the same thing in a very short period of time. It's not necessarily a deal breaker for you but I was for me. I'm sure i will join sometime this year but not anytime soon.
|
02-26-13 05:57pm
|
Reply
1339
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
The only negative thing that I can say with 21 sextury is that they tend to have way too many of the same type of scenes starring the same girls. This wasn't the case but it is one of the main reason why I cancelled my membership last year and I don't plan on joining for a little still. Mind you it is an amazing site the first time around.
|
02-25-13 06:30pm
|
Reply
1340
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
Sorry. I never even looked to see if Roku was an option for those movies. I think you got ten free minutes so at least you can check a few things out. I sort of prefer Hot Movies to AEBN because they tend to have a lot more older titles but they also have a lot of Bull shit content so that means a lot of searching to find what you want to watch.
|
02-24-13 10:53am
|
Reply
1341
|
N/A
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Poll
Sorry but what is metadata?
|
02-24-13 10:21am
|
Reply
1342
|
Lela Star
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Reply
I would save you the money and heartache when you join a solo model site hoping to get some intimate stuff and some exclusif content. Only to discover that there is neither and what there is isn't worth the money you paid.
I got burned so badly when I first started surfing the net that I had no choice but to avoid all solo model sites. Luckily it's not as bad now (in large part because of TBP/PU) but it's still wise to ask before you take out your credit card.
|
02-24-13 10:21am
|
Reply
1343
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
Hot Movies used to have a huge problem when it came to jumping ahead on the streaming video. The video would often stop working and go back to the beginning and it would require you to jump backt to where you were but I notice that they have fixed that problem.
|
02-24-13 10:17am
|
Reply
1344
|
Tegan Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
If you haven't read my comments for Lela Star then do so because they apply to her site as well. The one thing that may be different here is that you do get access to a network of porn performers so $18 is not be such a bad deal. Be advised that a percentage of the performers on the network are no longer active in porn so content is likely to be older and there won't be any addition.
|
02-23-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
1345
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Review
Hot movies is a slightly better site but the streaming cost is often a little more expensive on many titltes/series. They do have 90 vampire themed movies while AEBN has only 74.
|
02-23-13 06:23pm
|
Reply
1346
|
Lela Star
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
My rule of thumb with all solo model sites is that unless you know exactly what you are getting inside the members area then it means that there isn't anything of value. If you have visted her site then you already know that you can't see the content so she falls under the avoiud like the plague.
I'd also like to add that she hasn't posted anything on her Twitter accout since last July and she wasn't really active as a performer a long time before that so you are certainly won't be getting anything recent.
|
02-23-13 06:16pm
|
Reply
1347
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I really wish the people that picked yes to this would have at least posted a comment to explain why and which ones. I already have many of icons on my desktop so adding video files would simply cluter my desktop and I frankly don't see the point. I could see creating a special folder where your favorite videos are located for easier access but those can be in the video section of your computer. I use Windows 7 so access one of those videos would only be 3 clicks.
|
02-22-13 03:02pm
|
Reply
1348
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
Although it's true that captcha's are annoying. I can live with them because they are an extra tool to protect users. It's a lot more annoying when a site doesn't have auto logging because that means I have to remember my password and I don't always so that means I have to go look it up before logging in.
|
02-20-13 06:20pm
|
Reply
1349
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Poll
I saw the advertising for Roku here and there but never really bothered to read what it was about. I guess byt some of the comments that it's some kind of machine that allwos the stream of vidoes.
I don't think it's available where I live and that is fine with me because I wouldn't use it anyway.
|
02-18-13 05:50pm
|
Reply
1350
|
Teens Analyzed
(0)
|
Reply of
joekramer08's Reply
Be advised that if you have been a member of teen mega world then you may find that they share part of the same content.
|
02-18-13 05:47pm
|
