| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment
One day later -- It seems I was wrong about the old content. They seem to be still moving older material from CyberClub to Playboy Plus. It the past two days I've noticed about 20 sets added with much older posting dates. I've also been checking some of the videos. In some cases, about a dozen so far, I've noticed that they've posted a 1990's video that was originally a 320 X 240 QuickTime movie as a 1920 X 1080 MP4. However, the new version seems to be the same as the old with no better resolution, but a much larger file. I can understand their wanting to post the old sets, some of them are great, but the higher resolution just wastes disk space and bandwidth.
|
07-08-13 08:02pm
|
Reply
27
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment
It's been about a year and I rejoined Playboy Plus. They've finished moving all the material from the CyberClub and there is a lot to see. I still have one major complaint. About 25% of their photo sets consist of solo shots of more than one model. About 25% of these identify the models in each image, but the rest leave you to guess who is who. In the CyberClub nearly all the photos were identified by model. Since most of the unidentified images came from the CyberClub, I guess they just don't care to expend the effort.
|
07-07-13 03:09pm
|
Reply
28
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Reply
This is to update my previous comment. I was not locked out at 177 downloads. It seems they have occasional server interruptions that I thought was a lock-out. I've found that when I get a "Server Not Found" message, if I try again in a few minutes I'll get through. However, there is a 300 zip per day limit as stated in their terms of service and that is enforced.
|
05-23-13 03:07pm
|
Reply
29
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Horndog's Comment
The problem is still there. I joined yesterday. They say there is a daily limit of 300 zips or 20GB. I downloaded 177 zips (7GB) and found myself locked out. On the plus side many of the models are outstanding.
|
05-21-13 08:21am
|
Reply
30
|
House Of Gord
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
There is a lot of content on the site. For the past two years nearly all the videos have been 1280 X 720. There are about 100 sets of that size. Most of these video sets have 2 or 3 parts. (See to full site review here.) From 2007 thru 2010 most of the sets were 640 X 480. Earlier sets are even smaller.
Overall, I suggest that you join the site for one month and judge for yourself. I think you'll find enough to make at least one month's membership worthwhile. The content if varied. I found some of the sets very attractive and others were, for me, of no interest at all.
|
12-29-12 10:02am
|
Comment
31
|
House Of Gord
(0)
|
|
12-10-12 06:25pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
32
|
Bondage Cafe
(0)
|
|
11-29-12 01:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
33
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
|
08-08-12 05:08am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
34
|
Jasmine Sinclair
(0)
|
|
07-29-11 06:17am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
35
|
Restrained Elegance
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I can understand your concern. I am a new member and I don't know how the rating scheme works in practice. However, the system notes indicated that the 90-99 range was for an excellent site. I've visited a number of sites whose rating here was in the mid-90's and I feel that this site is better. It's my opinion and you certainly don't have to trust it. I did post what I think are the most relevant data both plus and minus. That was the most information I was willing to take the time to assemble. If the review was inadequate, I hope the owners of this site will pull it. On the other hand, I think it does describe the site fairly well.
|
10-17-08 04:36pm
|
Review
36
|
Restrained Elegance
(0)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates
Attractive models
Excellent photography
Lots of sets with the same models
90+ days of current sets pus another 90 of archives |
| Cons: |
Mostly glamor bondage (I like that, but more variety would be better)
More models would be better |
| Bottom Line: |
The best around for this type of bondage. I've been rejoining for a month every quarter for about 3 years now. The site keeps getting better. |
|
10-15-08 10:18am
Replies (3)
|
Review
37
|
Laurie Wallace
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gorgeous full-figured blond
Variety of poses and genres |
| Cons: |
Mostly small images - less than 100 K each
Photo quality of some sets is poor
No information about update frequency |
| Bottom Line: |
Don't join. The best quality sets are available on other sites at higher resolution. |
|
10-15-08 10:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
Absolute Adriana
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent photo quality
Med-Hi Resolution - 200-500 K per photo
Gorgeous long-haired blond with natural breasts
100+ sets with 80-100 photos each |
| Cons: |
No updates since April 2007
Most sets have the standard sequence of soft-core poses greater variety would have been a plus |
| Bottom Line: |
Join for one month, she's worth it unless you insist on artificially augmented boobs. |
|
10-15-08 09:56am
Replies (0)
|
